****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Biotechnology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ABT 495 001L1 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chappell, Joseph ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 18 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 11.8 Required by my major 17 100.0 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 8 47.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 27.8 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 33.3 50.0 11.1 2.7 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 50.0 44.4 5.6 0.0 1.6 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 5.6 5.6 72.2 16.7 3.0 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 41.2 41.2 11.8 2.6 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 0.0 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 33. Amount of work appropriate 17 11.8 41.2 35.3 11.8 2.5 0.87 34. Instructor explained expectations 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 35. Instructor helped with my problems 17 0.0 23.5 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.53 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Biotechnology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ABT 360 001L1 GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pfeiffer, Todd W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 23.5 Sophomore 3 17.6 B 6 35.3 Junior 9 52.9 C 5 29.4 Senior 5 29.4 D 1 5.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.8 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 3 17.6 Required by my major 13 76.5 3 hours 9 52.9 Other (e.g. elective) 3 17.6 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 23.5 47.1 29.4 3.1 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 23.5 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 23.5 23.5 52.9 0.0 2.3 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 16.7 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 17.6 70.6 11.8 2.9 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 12.5 12.5 25.0 50.0 0.0 3.1 1.09 38. Question 38 16 18.8 18.8 18.8 43.8 0.0 2.9 1.20 39. Question 39 16 18.8 31.3 12.5 37.5 0.0 2.7 1.20 40. Question 40 16 12.5 18.8 50.0 18.8 0.0 2.8 0.93 41. Question 41 16 18.8 18.8 37.5 25.0 0.0 2.7 1.08 42. Question 42 15 26.7 40.0 20.0 13.3 0.0 2.2 1.01 43. Question 43 16 6.3 12.5 18.8 62.5 0.0 3.4 0.96 44. Question 44 16 6.3 12.5 25.0 56.3 0.0 3.3 0.95 45. Question 45 16 18.8 25.0 6.3 50.0 0.0 2.9 1.26 46. Question 46 16 6.3 31.3 31.3 31.3 0.0 2.9 0.96 47. Question 47 16 6.3 18.8 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.9 0.85 48. Question 48 16 12.5 18.8 43.8 25.0 0.0 2.8 0.98 49. Question 49 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 3.7 0.79 Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 64.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Biotechnology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ABT 401 001L1 TECHNICAL WRITING AND PRESENTATIONS IN BIOTECH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Strobel, Herbert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 16.7 Junior 4 30.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 69.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 46.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 13 100.0 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 2.6 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 15.4 30.8 46.2 7.7 2.5 0.88 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 50.0 30.0 20.0 2.7 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ACE FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACE 302 001L1 LEADERSHP STUDIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garkovich, Lorraine E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 34 82.9 Sophomore 5 11.9 B 7 17.1 Junior 17 40.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 47.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 25 61.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 14.6 Required by my major 15 35.7 3 hours 9 22.0 Other (e.g. elective) 27 64.3 4 - 5 hours 1 2.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 2.3 31.8 65.9 3.6 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 0.0 2.3 43.2 54.5 3.5 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 44 0.0 2.3 45.5 52.3 3.5 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 44 0.0 2.3 34.1 63.6 3.6 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 44 0.0 0.0 34.1 65.9 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 0.0 4.5 38.6 56.8 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 44 2.3 2.3 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 44 0.0 4.5 34.1 61.4 3.6 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 0.0 4.5 38.6 56.8 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 43 0.0 4.7 37.2 58.1 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 44 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 0.0 4.7 23.3 72.1 3.7 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 44 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 2.4 42.9 54.8 3.5 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 43 0.0 2.3 51.2 46.5 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 0.0 2.4 50.0 47.6 3.5 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 0.0 0.0 37.2 62.8 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 43 2.3 0.0 48.8 48.8 3.4 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 0.0 0.0 27.9 72.1 3.7 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 43 0.0 2.3 16.3 81.4 3.8 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ACE FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACE 362 001O1 PRACTICUM IN VOCATIONAL ED, AG COMM, & LEADERSHP INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Weckman, R D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 5 50.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 4 40.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 3 30.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ACE FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACE 362 001O2 PRACTICUM IN VOCATIONAL ED, AG COMM, & LEADERSHP INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Witham, Deborah B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 5 45.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 54.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 5 45.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 27.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 7.1 85.7 3.8 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 303 001L1 MICROECONOMIC CONCEPTS IN AG ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anderson, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 24.1 Sophomore 1 3.4 B 15 51.7 Junior 16 55.2 C 7 24.1 Senior 12 41.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 20.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 41.4 Required by my major 29 100.0 3 hours 7 24.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 10.3 6 - 7 hours 1 3.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 64.5 32.3 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 6.5 22.6 58.1 12.9 2.8 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 3.2 61.3 35.5 3.3 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 9.7 54.8 35.5 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 9.7 58.1 32.3 3.2 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 0.0 67.7 32.3 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 77.4 22.6 3.2 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 16.1 64.5 19.4 3.0 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 6.5 58.1 35.5 3.3 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 31 3.2 3.2 54.8 38.7 3.3 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 64.5 35.5 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 3.2 3.2 64.5 29.0 3.2 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 30 3.3 0.0 60.0 36.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 3.3 6.7 73.3 16.7 3.0 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 3.3 6.7 56.7 33.3 3.2 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 6.5 61.3 29.0 3.2 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 3.3 3.3 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 10.0 56.7 30.0 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 3.2 3.2 71.0 22.6 3.1 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 9.7 54.8 35.5 3.3 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 63 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 49.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 302 001L1 AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillon, Carl ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 52.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 35.3 Junior 5 31.3 C 2 11.8 Senior 11 68.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 47.1 Required by my major 11 68.8 3 hours 1 5.9 Other (e.g. elective) 5 31.3 4 - 5 hours 5 29.4 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 0.0 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 62.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 302 002L1 AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillon, Carl ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 50.0 Junior 5 41.7 C 1 8.3 Senior 7 58.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 9 75.0 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 0.0 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 16.7 0.0 16.7 66.7 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 661 001L1 PROGRAMMING MODELS AEC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillon, Carl ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 83.3 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 3 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 445G001L1 INTRO RESOURCE/ENVIR ECO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fleming, Ronald ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 42.9 Junior 5 35.7 C 3 21.4 Senior 7 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 14.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 42.9 Required by my major 10 71.4 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 28.6 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 35.7 28.6 35.7 0.0 2.0 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 624 001L1 ADV QUANT METHS IN AEC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fleming, Ronald ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 11.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 11.1 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 7 77.8 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 22.2 8 or more hours 3 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 30.0 20.0 50.0 3.2 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 50.0 12.5 37.5 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 305 001L1 FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL MARKETING PRINCIPLES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mather, Loys L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 3.4 A 1 3.6 Sophomore 4 13.8 B 18 64.3 Junior 16 55.2 C 9 32.1 Senior 8 27.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.6 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 16 57.1 Required by my major 21 75.0 3 hours 2 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 21.4 4 - 5 hours 5 17.9 6 - 7 hours 3 10.7 8 or more hours 1 3.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 6.5 32.3 61.3 3.5 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 3.2 16.1 32.3 48.4 3.3 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 3.2 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 3.2 9.7 38.7 48.4 3.3 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 3.2 48.4 48.4 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 16.1 41.9 41.9 3.3 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 32.3 22.6 22.6 22.6 2.4 1.17 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 6.7 50.0 43.3 3.4 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 3.2 6.5 38.7 51.6 3.4 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 3.2 0.0 12.9 83.9 3.8 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 31 3.2 0.0 25.8 71.0 3.6 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 3.2 0.0 29.0 67.7 3.6 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 6.5 6.5 29.0 58.1 3.4 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 31 3.2 0.0 25.8 71.0 3.6 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 3.6 0.0 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 3.2 6.5 41.9 48.4 3.4 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 0.0 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 3.2 3.2 38.7 54.8 3.5 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 9.7 16.1 35.5 38.7 3.0 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 10.0 43.3 46.7 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 3.3 16.7 16.7 63.3 3.4 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 96.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 305 002L1 FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL MARKETING PRINCIPLES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mather, Loys L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 31.6 Sophomore 4 21.1 B 9 47.4 Junior 8 42.1 C 4 21.1 Senior 7 36.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 3 15.8 Required by my major 15 78.9 3 hours 10 52.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 4 21.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 0.0 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 4.2 45.8 45.8 3.3 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 25.0 54.2 20.8 3.0 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 4.2 95.8 4.0 0.20 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 4.2 95.8 4.0 0.20 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 4.2 20.8 75.0 3.7 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 4.2 20.8 75.0 3.7 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 4.2 12.5 83.3 3.8 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 321 001L1 AG FUTURES MARKETS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Maynard, Leigh J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 34.6 Sophomore 1 3.8 B 13 50.0 Junior 10 38.5 C 4 15.4 Senior 15 57.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 19.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 38.5 Required by my major 22 88.0 3 hours 9 34.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 12.0 4 - 5 hours 1 3.8 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 44.8 55.2 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 27.6 48.3 24.1 3.0 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 6.9 48.3 44.8 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 7.1 0.0 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 6.9 41.4 51.7 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 51.7 41.4 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 3.4 44.8 51.7 3.5 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 10.3 41.4 48.3 3.4 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 3.4 37.9 58.6 3.6 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 60.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 606 001L1 ADV AGRICULTURAL MKT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Maynard, Leigh J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 3 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 410 001L1 INTERNATL TRADE & AG MKT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Reed, Michael R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 27.8 Junior 2 11.1 C 5 27.8 Senior 9 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 38.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 5 27.8 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 13 72.2 4 - 5 hours 5 27.8 6 - 7 hours 2 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 5.6 5.6 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.79 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 0.0 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 5.6 61.1 27.8 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 5.6 11.1 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 11.1 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 11.1 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 11.1 0.0 44.4 44.4 3.2 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 5.6 0.0 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.77 11. Was available for consultation 18 5.6 5.6 27.8 61.1 3.4 0.86 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 5.6 5.6 22.2 66.7 3.5 0.86 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 16.7 0.0 38.9 44.4 3.1 1.08 14. Encouraged class participation 18 11.1 16.7 22.2 50.0 3.1 1.08 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 0.0 68.8 25.0 3.1 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 5.9 0.0 58.8 35.3 3.2 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 0.0 52.9 41.2 3.3 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 0.0 41.2 52.9 3.4 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 23.5 5.9 41.2 29.4 2.8 1.15 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 5.6 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 11.1 5.6 33.3 50.0 3.2 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AEC 532 001L1 AGRICULT & FOOD POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skees, Jerry R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 54.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 45.2 Junior 5 16.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 64.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 19.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 51.6 Required by my major 13 41.9 3 hours 7 22.6 Other (e.g. elective) 18 58.1 4 - 5 hours 4 12.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 3.0 12.1 39.4 45.5 3.3 0.80 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 15.6 40.6 43.8 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 8.8 44.1 47.1 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 8.8 44.1 47.1 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 2.9 11.8 47.1 38.2 3.2 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 2.9 11.8 41.2 44.1 3.3 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 14.7 41.2 41.2 3.2 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 2.9 5.9 44.1 47.1 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 2.9 38.2 58.8 3.6 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 5.9 44.1 50.0 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 8.8 2.9 35.3 52.9 3.3 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 8.8 32.4 58.8 3.5 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 8.8 38.2 52.9 3.4 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 6.1 33.3 60.6 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 11.8 38.2 50.0 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 8.8 41.2 50.0 3.4 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 8.8 11.8 35.3 44.1 3.1 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 6.1 3.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 6.1 6.1 30.3 57.6 3.4 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 87.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data.