****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 300 006L1 QUANT ANALY IN OPS MGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chung, Chen H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 64.3 Sophomore 3 7.0 B 15 35.7 Junior 16 37.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 24 55.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 62.8 Studies Program 1 2.3 2 hours 12 27.9 Required by my major 40 93.0 3 hours 1 2.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 4.7 4 - 5 hours 3 7.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 48 0.0 0.0 39.6 60.4 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 30.4 26.1 26.1 17.4 2.3 1.09 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 2.9 8.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 48 0.0 2.1 45.8 52.1 3.5 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 2.4 47.6 50.0 3.5 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 2.6 12.8 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 48 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 48 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 45 0.0 2.2 37.8 60.0 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 48 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 4.2 16.7 45.8 33.3 3.1 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 47 0.0 10.6 55.3 34.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 47 0.0 2.1 48.9 48.9 3.5 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 47 0.0 2.1 48.9 48.9 3.5 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 0.0 0.0 52.1 47.9 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 8.9 28.9 33.3 28.9 2.8 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 48 2.1 18.8 52.1 27.1 3.0 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 48 0.0 2.1 39.6 58.3 3.6 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 96 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 48 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 406 001L1 PRODUC/INVENTORY CONTROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chung, Chen H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 91.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 8.7 Junior 4 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 37.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 45.8 Required by my major 24 100.0 3 hours 4 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 13.0 21.7 30.4 34.8 2.9 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 8.0 0.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.86 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 11.5 88.5 3.9 0.33 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 3.7 3.7 29.6 63.0 3.5 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 3.7 40.7 55.6 3.5 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 4.0 4.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 3.7 0.0 59.3 37.0 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 3.7 0.0 55.6 40.7 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 11.1 51.9 37.0 3.3 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 7.4 33.3 59.3 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 3.7 18.5 77.8 3.7 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 56.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DIS 450 001L1 DECISION ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrod, Steve ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 43.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 36.7 Junior 2 6.7 C 6 20.0 Senior 28 93.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 13.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 26.7 Required by my major 28 96.6 3 hours 7 23.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.4 4 - 5 hours 10 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 13.3 43.3 40.0 3.3 2.3 0.76 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 64.0 24.0 12.0 0.0 1.5 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 16.7 26.7 50.0 6.7 2.5 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 6.7 43.3 46.7 3.3 2.5 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 41.4 34.5 24.1 0.0 1.8 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 10.3 24.1 55.2 10.3 2.7 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 3.6 3.6 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 13.3 50.0 33.3 3.3 2.3 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 40.0 40.0 16.7 3.3 1.8 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 3.3 26.7 46.7 23.3 2.9 0.80 11. Was available for consultation 28 10.7 17.9 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.84 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 23.3 23.3 50.0 3.3 2.3 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 30.0 40.0 23.3 6.7 2.1 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 30 16.7 20.0 53.3 10.0 2.6 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 10.7 42.9 42.9 3.6 2.4 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 6.7 40.0 46.7 6.7 2.5 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 6.9 34.5 55.2 3.4 2.6 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 6.7 50.0 40.0 3.3 2.4 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 16.7 46.7 33.3 3.3 2.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 22.6 54.8 19.4 3.2 2.0 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 45.2 41.9 9.7 3.2 1.7 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 66.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 621 401L1 BUSINESS EXPERT SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holsapple, Clyde W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 38.9 Required by my major 12 66.7 3 hours 3 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 33.3 4 - 5 hours 3 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 26.3 68.4 3.6 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 26.3 63.2 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 21.1 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 76.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 623 001L1 BUS DECISION SUPPORT SYS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holsapple, Clyde W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 92.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 14 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 10 71.4 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 28.6 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 33.3 20.0 46.7 3.1 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 390 001L1 SP TOPS DIS:ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS AND DESIGNS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lee-Post, Anita ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 5 50.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 50.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 38.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 622 001L1 BUS DATA SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lee-Post, Anita ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 88.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 11.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 17 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 12 70.6 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 5 29.4 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 753 001S1 SEM MANAGEMENT SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Muralidhar, K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 14.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 3 42.9 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 57.1 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 001L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pakath, Ramakrishnan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 22.7 Junior 5 22.7 C 2 9.1 Senior 17 77.3 D 1 4.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 40.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 9 40.9 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 13 59.1 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 4.2 0.0 66.7 29.2 3.2 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 12.5 45.8 37.5 3.2 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 8.3 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 16.7 54.2 25.0 3.0 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 4.2 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 8.3 58.3 29.2 3.1 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 4.2 79.2 12.5 3.0 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 8.3 0.0 62.5 29.2 3.1 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 20.8 45.8 29.2 3.0 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 4.2 0.0 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 24 4.2 0.0 66.7 29.2 3.2 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 4.2 4.2 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 30.4 34.8 30.4 2.9 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 24 8.3 16.7 54.2 20.8 2.9 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 10.5 26.3 52.6 10.5 2.6 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 17.4 69.6 8.7 2.8 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 13.6 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 8.3 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 39.1 39.1 17.4 2.7 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 20.8 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 24 4.2 0.0 45.8 50.0 0.0 3.4 0.72 38. Question 38 24 8.3 0.0 29.2 62.5 0.0 3.5 0.88 39. Question 39 24 4.2 4.2 25.0 66.7 0.0 3.5 0.78 40. Question 40 24 4.2 8.3 45.8 41.7 0.0 3.3 0.79 41. Question 41 24 4.2 0.0 50.0 45.8 0.0 3.4 0.71 42. Question 42 24 4.2 0.0 33.3 62.5 0.0 3.5 0.72 43. Question 43 23 8.7 13.0 52.2 26.1 0.0 3.0 0.88 44. Question 44 23 8.7 17.4 56.5 17.4 0.0 2.8 0.83 Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 002L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pakath, Ramakrishnan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 8 40.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 45.0 Required by my major 12 63.2 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 36.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 5.0 15.0 65.0 15.0 2.9 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 31.6 57.9 5.3 2.6 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 20 10.0 30.0 55.0 5.0 2.6 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 21.4 71.4 0.0 2.6 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 27.8 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 42.1 57.9 0.0 2.6 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 25.0 70.0 0.0 2.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 20 0.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 0.0 3.7 0.59 38. Question 38 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 0.0 3.6 0.60 39. Question 39 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 3.7 0.47 40. Question 40 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 3.4 0.67 41. Question 41 20 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 3.4 0.82 42. Question 42 20 0.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 0.0 3.7 0.57 43. Question 43 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 0.0 3.2 0.70 44. Question 44 20 10.0 40.0 35.0 15.0 0.0 2.6 0.89 Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 60.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 003L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Santhanam, Radhika ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 40.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 54.5 Junior 9 40.9 C 1 4.5 Senior 13 59.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 50.0 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 8 36.4 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 13 59.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 8.7 13.0 56.5 21.7 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 8.7 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 13.0 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 26.1 34.8 39.1 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 74.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 004L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Santhanam, Radhika ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 47.6 Junior 3 14.3 C 2 9.5 Senior 18 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 52.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 4.8 Required by my major 5 23.8 3 hours 7 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 16 76.2 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 4.8 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 26.3 63.2 10.5 2.8 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 28.6 38.1 28.6 2.9 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 19.0 52.4 28.6 3.1 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 67.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = B&E 309 401L1 INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Debin, George J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 40.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 29.6 Junior 7 25.0 C 3 11.1 Senior 20 71.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 5 18.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 46.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 35.7 Required by my major 7 25.0 3 hours 5 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 21 75.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 2.9 62.9 34.3 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.43 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 0.0 69.4 30.6 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 9.7 71.0 19.4 3.1 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 2.8 44.4 52.8 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 55.9 44.1 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 0.0 8.3 47.2 44.4 3.4 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 65.6 31.3 3.3 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 3.0 72.7 24.2 3.2 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 6.1 66.7 27.3 3.2 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 8.6 65.7 25.7 3.2 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 8.6 42.9 48.6 3.4 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 83.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 006L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ali, Mukhtar M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 53.8 Sophomore 2 5.1 B 14 35.9 Junior 8 20.5 C 3 7.7 Senior 29 74.4 D 1 2.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 20.5 Studies Program 1 2.6 2 hours 21 53.8 Required by my major 35 92.1 3 hours 6 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.3 4 - 5 hours 4 10.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 0.0 0.0 72.5 27.5 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 12.5 22.5 57.5 7.5 2.6 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 0.0 0.0 47.5 52.5 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 0.0 57.5 42.5 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 2.5 10.0 55.0 32.5 3.2 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 0.0 2.5 52.5 45.0 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 40 0.0 0.0 57.5 42.5 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 7.7 12.8 53.8 25.6 3.0 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 2.5 57.5 40.0 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 5.6 19.4 52.8 22.2 2.9 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 3.4 20.7 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 40 0.0 2.5 70.0 27.5 3.3 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 5.0 67.5 27.5 3.2 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 17.1 31.4 40.0 11.4 2.5 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 17.5 60.0 22.5 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 70.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 790 001L1 TIME SERIES ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ali, Mukhtar M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 77.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 88.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 11.1 Pass or Audit 2 22.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 11.1 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 88.9 4 - 5 hours 6 66.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 22.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 653 401L1 HEALTH ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = BLOMQUIST, GLENN C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 47.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 52.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 94.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 15.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 11 57.9 3 hours 2 10.5 Other (e.g. elective) 8 42.1 4 - 5 hours 5 26.3 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 2 10.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 20.0 40.0 35.0 3.1 0.89 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 15.0 20.0 55.0 10.0 2.6 0.88 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 20.0 45.0 30.0 3.0 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 25.0 35.0 40.0 3.2 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 15.8 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.90 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 15.8 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 5.0 10.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 15.0 30.0 40.0 15.0 2.6 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 25.0 40.0 35.0 3.1 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 25.0 15.0 60.0 3.4 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 477 001L1 LABOR ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berger, Mark C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 34.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 58.6 Junior 7 23.3 C 1 3.4 Senior 23 76.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 23.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 53.3 Required by my major 21 70.0 3 hours 5 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 9 30.0 4 - 5 hours 2 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 3.3 63.3 33.3 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 16.7 60.0 23.3 3.1 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 3.3 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 3.3 53.3 43.3 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 3.3 56.7 40.0 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 10.3 65.5 24.1 3.1 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 3.3 23.3 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 3.3 0.0 66.7 30.0 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 36.7 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 3.3 20.0 46.7 30.0 3.0 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 54.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 002L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bollinger, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 52.6 Sophomore 1 2.6 B 14 36.8 Junior 19 48.7 C 4 10.5 Senior 19 48.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 25.6 Studies Program 2 5.1 2 hours 16 41.0 Required by my major 37 94.9 3 hours 10 25.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 51.3 48.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 10.3 28.2 41.0 20.5 2.7 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 0.0 5.1 46.2 48.7 3.4 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 2.6 47.4 50.0 3.5 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 0.0 2.6 51.3 46.2 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 0.0 51.3 48.7 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 2.6 10.5 52.6 34.2 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 0.0 7.9 39.5 52.6 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 44.7 55.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 0.0 7.7 51.3 41.0 3.3 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 3.2 3.2 67.7 25.8 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 2.6 53.8 43.6 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 5.3 23.7 47.4 23.7 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 0.0 5.3 65.8 28.9 3.2 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 0.0 5.3 26.3 68.4 3.6 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered