****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 107 003L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ades, Harriet F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 34 75.6 A 10 21.7 Sophomore 3 6.7 B 23 50.0 Junior 2 4.4 C 12 26.1 Senior 2 4.4 D 1 2.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 8.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 6.5 Studies Program 1 2.2 2 hours 8 17.4 Required by my major 43 93.5 3 hours 16 34.8 Other (e.g. elective) 2 4.3 4 - 5 hours 14 30.4 6 - 7 hours 2 4.3 8 or more hours 3 6.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 50 0.0 2.0 68.0 30.0 3.3 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 50 6.0 16.0 52.0 26.0 3.0 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 50 4.0 14.0 62.0 20.0 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 49 4.1 16.3 59.2 20.4 3.0 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 50 2.0 2.0 66.0 30.0 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 50 2.0 6.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 2.2 2.2 58.7 37.0 3.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 22.6 41.9 25.8 9.7 2.2 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 4.1 26.5 53.1 16.3 2.8 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 50 2.0 8.0 58.0 32.0 3.2 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 48 2.1 4.2 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 50 2.0 14.0 66.0 18.0 3.0 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 18.8 33.3 39.6 8.3 2.4 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 48 4.2 35.4 41.7 18.8 2.8 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 37 2.7 24.3 62.2 10.8 2.8 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 49 2.0 10.2 73.5 14.3 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 49 2.0 6.1 73.5 18.4 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 50 2.0 16.0 60.0 22.0 3.0 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 48 29.2 25.0 35.4 10.4 2.3 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 49 4.1 30.6 53.1 12.2 2.7 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 49 8.2 28.6 42.9 20.4 2.8 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 38.5 38.5 23.1 2.8 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 145 Number of forms scanned = 145 Number of forms with at least one student response = 50 Percent completed = 34.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 230 001L1 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anthony, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 4.1 A 20 27.8 Sophomore 50 68.5 B 22 30.6 Junior 14 19.2 C 21 29.2 Senior 5 6.8 D 5 6.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 4 5.6 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.4 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 5.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 16.2 Required by my major 65 89.0 3 hours 18 24.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 11.0 4 - 5 hours 18 24.3 6 - 7 hours 11 14.9 8 or more hours 11 14.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 77 0.0 14.3 54.5 31.2 3.2 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 77 7.8 14.3 49.4 28.6 3.0 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 55 1.8 20.0 56.4 21.8 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 77 3.9 18.2 58.4 19.5 2.9 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 75 4.0 16.0 54.7 25.3 3.0 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 49 0.0 18.4 59.2 22.4 3.0 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 75 0.0 1.3 54.7 44.0 3.4 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 67 13.4 38.8 34.3 13.4 2.5 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 77 10.4 26.0 36.4 27.3 2.8 0.96 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 77 1.3 0.0 31.2 67.5 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 70 2.9 7.1 67.1 22.9 3.1 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 77 2.6 15.6 51.9 29.9 3.1 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 77 18.2 32.5 35.1 14.3 2.5 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 77 7.8 9.1 49.4 33.8 3.1 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 52 7.7 26.9 44.2 21.2 2.8 0.87 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 75 1.3 10.7 62.7 25.3 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 75 1.3 13.3 60.0 25.3 3.1 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 76 6.6 11.8 52.6 28.9 3.0 0.82 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 73 26.0 28.8 30.1 15.1 2.3 1.03 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 76 11.8 21.1 47.4 19.7 2.8 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 75 17.3 18.7 30.7 33.3 2.8 1.09. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 134 Number of forms scanned = 133 Number of forms with at least one student response = 77 Percent completed = 57.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 548 001L1 PRIN OF PHYSICAL CHEM II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Butterfield, D. Allan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 52.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 5.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.0 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 1 5.0 Required by my major 11 61.1 3 hours 5 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 33.3 4 - 5 hours 5 25.0 6 - 7 hours 3 15.0 8 or more hours 5 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 16.7 54.2 25.0 3.0 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 13.6 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 28.6 33.3 38.1 3.1 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 4.2 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 12.5 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 8.7 30.4 56.5 3.4 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 4.3 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 4.2 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 8.7 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 8.3 29.2 58.3 3.4 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 4.2 25.0 66.7 3.5 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 643 001L1 SPECTROSCOPY & PHOTOPHYS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clouthier, Dennis J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 565 001L1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeMoll, Edward ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 60.0 Junior 2 12.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 50.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 2 11.8 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 3 17.6 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 12 70.6 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 3 20.0 8 or more hours 1 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 27.8 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 35.3 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 17.6 35.3 47.1 3.3 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 17.6 58.8 23.5 3.1 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 56.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 535 001L1 SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CHEM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Grossman, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 12.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 12.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 11.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 77.8 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 7 70.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 2.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 68.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 105 001L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holler, F. James ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 66.7 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 1 6.7 B 5 35.7 Junior 1 6.7 C 3 21.4 Senior 2 13.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 7.1 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 1 6.7 2 hours 3 20.0 Required by my major 13 86.7 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 6 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 13.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 5.6 0.0 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 11.1 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 0.0 33.3 61.1 3.5 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 5.6 5.6 22.2 66.7 3.5 0.86 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 5.6 0.0 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 5.6 5.6 83.3 3.7 0.84 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 11.8 0.0 11.8 76.5 3.5 1.01 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 50.0 0.0 30.0 20.0 2.2 1.32 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 11.1 22.2 61.1 3.4 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 5.6 0.0 11.1 83.3 3.7 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 16 6.3 6.3 18.8 68.8 3.5 0.89 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 11.1 5.6 16.7 66.7 3.4 1.04 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 16.7 16.7 61.1 3.3 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 16.7 16.7 61.1 3.3 0.97 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 18.2 9.1 18.2 54.5 3.1 1.22 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 12.5 0.0 31.3 56.3 3.3 1.01 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 5.6 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.85 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 11.8 17.6 23.5 47.1 3.1 1.09 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 11.8 0.0 82.4 3.6 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 175 Number of forms scanned = 175 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 10.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 105 002L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holler, F. James ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 72.4 A 7 25.0 Sophomore 5 17.2 B 10 35.7 Junior 1 3.4 C 10 35.7 Senior 2 6.9 D 1 3.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 10.3 Studies Program 5 17.2 2 hours 8 27.6 Required by my major 20 69.0 3 hours 6 20.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 13.8 4 - 5 hours 5 17.2 6 - 7 hours 2 6.9 8 or more hours 5 17.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 3.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 6.3 6.3 46.9 40.6 3.2 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 3.1 3.1 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 6.1 42.4 51.5 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 0.0 48.5 51.5 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 21.7 47.8 30.4 3.1 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 2.9 5.9 44.1 47.1 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 0.0 12.1 51.5 36.4 3.2 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 6.1 9.1 39.4 45.5 3.2 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 33 3.0 9.1 48.5 39.4 3.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 12.0 64.0 24.0 3.1 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 3.1 59.4 37.5 3.3 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 6.1 57.6 36.4 3.3 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 12.1 15.2 36.4 36.4 3.0 1.02 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 3.0 9.1 51.5 36.4 3.2 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 3.2 6.5 41.9 48.4 3.4 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 212 Number of forms scanned = 210 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 16.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 232 001L1 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Meier, Mark S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 40 51.3 Sophomore 42 52.5 B 20 25.6 Junior 30 37.5 C 18 23.1 Senior 7 8.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 6.3 Studies Program 1 1.3 2 hours 16 20.0 Required by my major 77 96.3 3 hours 24 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 2.5 4 - 5 hours 22 27.5 6 - 7 hours 10 12.5 8 or more hours 3 3.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 97 0.0 1.0 38.1 60.8 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 96 0.0 10.4 38.5 51.0 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 93 0.0 5.4 50.5 44.1 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 97 0.0 4.1 55.7 40.2 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 96 0.0 8.3 51.0 40.6 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 82 0.0 7.3 43.9 48.8 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 95 0.0 2.1 32.6 65.3 3.6 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 85 4.7 29.4 37.6 28.2 2.9 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 97 0.0 3.1 34.0 62.9 3.6 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 97 0.0 1.0 14.4 84.5 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 90 0.0 2.2 33.3 64.4 3.6 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 96 0.0 1.0 29.2 69.8 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 94 5.3 14.9 33.0 46.8 3.2 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 96 0.0 1.0 28.1 70.8 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 58 0.0 19.0 43.1 37.9 3.2 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 92 0.0 7.6 37.0 55.4 3.5 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 90 0.0 5.6 43.3 51.1 3.5 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 94 2.1 8.5 33.0 56.4 3.4 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 89 9.0 24.7 31.5 34.8 2.9 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 96 1.0 8.3 47.9 42.7 3.3 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 96 0.0 2.1 20.8 77.1 3.8 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 169 Number of forms scanned = 154 Number of forms with at least one student response = 97 Percent completed = 57.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 232 002L1 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Meier, Mark S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 28.6 Sophomore 16 38.1 B 15 35.7 Junior 16 38.1 C 11 26.2 Senior 8 19.0 D 2 4.8 Graduate 2 4.8 E/Fail 2 4.8 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 9.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 9.5 Required by my major 41 97.6 3 hours 11 26.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.4 4 - 5 hours 14 33.3 6 - 7 hours 7 16.7 8 or more hours 2 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 0.0 56.8 43.2 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 4.5 2.3 50.0 43.2 3.3 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 2.4 4.8 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 44 6.8 11.4 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.87 5. Grading was fair and consistent 44 4.5 15.9 43.2 36.4 3.1 0.84 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 5.6 58.3 19.4 16.7 2.5 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 0.0 4.5 43.2 52.3 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 0.0 20.5 79.5 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 43 0.0 4.7 44.2 51.2 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 2.3 41.9 55.8 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 6.8 15.9 47.7 29.5 3.0 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 44 2.3 2.3 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 6.9 6.9 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 43 2.3 4.7 62.8 30.2 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 0.0 9.8 61.0 29.3 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 44 0.0 11.4 61.4 27.3 3.2 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 9.8 29.3 46.3 14.6 2.7 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 4.5 15.9 45.5 34.1 3.1 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 4.5 2.3 31.8 61.4 3.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 86 Number of forms scanned = 86 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 51.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 441G002A1 PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Oei, Djong-Gie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 38.9 Junior 7 35.0 C 1 5.6 Senior 13 65.0 D 1 5.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 1 5.0 Required by my major 19 95.0 3 hours 1 5.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 14 70.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 15.0 50.0 30.0 5.0 2.3 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 15.0 65.0 20.0 3.1 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 25.0 65.0 10.0 2.9 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 31.6 57.9 10.5 2.8 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 55.0 35.0 10.0 2.6 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 73.7 15.8 3.1 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 13.3 20.0 60.0 6.7 2.6 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 55.0 25.0 10.0 2.4 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 10.0 35.0 35.0 20.0 2.7 0.93 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 25.0 40.0 35.0 3.1 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 10.0 20.0 40.0 30.0 2.9 0.99 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 2.0 1.05 34. Instructor explained expectations 9 11.1 22.2 33.3 33.3 2.9 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 12.5 0.0 37.5 50.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 231 001A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.7 A 21 56.8 Sophomore 16 43.2 B 14 37.8 Junior 13 35.1 C 1 2.7 Senior 7 18.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 2.7 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 5.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 35.1 Required by my major 37 100.0 3 hours 10 27.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 9 24.3 6 - 7 hours 1 2.7 8 or more hours 2 5.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 2.3 59.1 38.6 3.4 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 0.0 11.4 65.9 22.7 3.1 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 0.0 65.9 34.1 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 2.4 12.2 58.5 26.8 3.1 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 0.0 4.5 61.4 34.1 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 5.6 69.4 25.0 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 6.3 25.0 40.6 28.1 2.9 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 43 0.0 2.3 41.9 55.8 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 44 0.0 2.3 45.5 52.3 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 4.7 23.3 51.2 20.9 2.9 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 44 2.3 13.6 50.0 34.1 3.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 3.3 23.3 56.7 16.7 2.9 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 0.0 4.9 70.7 24.4 3.2 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 11.9 38.1 38.1 11.9 2.5 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 0.0 15.9 63.6 20.5 3.0 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 0.0 2.3 36.4 61.4 3.6 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 22 4.5 0.0 72.7 22.7 3.1 0.64 33. Amount of work appropriate 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 34. Instructor explained expectations 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 35. Instructor helped with my problems 21 4.8 9.5 52.4 33.3 3.1 0.79 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 22 4.5 22.7 59.1 13.6 2.8 0.73 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 61 Number of forms scanned = 59 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 72.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 231 002A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.9 A 24 70.6 Sophomore 19 55.9 B 10 29.4 Junior 8 23.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 11.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 5.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 2.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 23.5 Required by my major 31 91.2 3 hours 13 38.2 Other (e.g. elective) 3 8.8 4 - 5 hours 8 23.5 6 - 7 hours 3 8.8 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 2.6 2.6 39.5 55.3 3.5 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 5.3 7.9 52.6 34.2 3.2 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 0.0 5.3 60.5 34.2 3.3 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 2.9 11.8 50.0 35.3 3.2 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 5.3 60.5 34.2 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 3.6 60.7 35.7 3.3 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 19.2 53.8 26.9 3.1 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 6.5 35.5 58.1 3.5 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 5.3 31.6 34.2 28.9 2.9 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 38 0.0 18.4 55.3 26.3 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 8.0 12.0 44.0 36.0 3.1 0.91 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 2.9 58.8 38.2 3.4 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 2.8 55.6 41.7 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 14.3 37.1 34.3 14.3 2.5 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 2.6 7.9 60.5 28.9 3.2 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 34 0.0 8.8 55.9 35.3 3.3 0.62 33. Amount of work appropriate 34 14.7 14.7 47.1 23.5 2.8 0.98 34. Instructor explained expectations 35 0.0 2.9 51.4 45.7 3.4 0.56 35. Instructor helped with my problems 29 6.9 10.3 51.7 31.0 3.1 0.84 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 35 2.9 14.3 65.7 17.1 3.0 0.66 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 56 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 233 001A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 30 55.6 Sophomore 21 37.5 B 19 35.2 Junior 14 25.0 C 4 7.4 Senior 15 26.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 5.4 E/Fail 1 1.9 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 5.4 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 21.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 23.6 Required by my major 44 78.6 3 hours 15 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 12 21.4 4 - 5 hours 11 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 1.8 8 or more hours 3 5.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 59 0.0 1.7 62.7 35.6 3.3 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 19.2 57.7 23.1 3.0 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 55 1.8 7.3 61.8 29.1 3.2 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 58 1.7 12.1 60.3 25.9 3.1 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 57 5.3 8.8 61.4 24.6 3.1 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 55 0.0 7.3 76.4 16.4 3.1 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 51 0.0 7.8 66.7 25.5 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 46 2.2 23.9 60.9 13.0 2.8 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 58 0.0 3.4 67.2 29.3 3.3 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 58 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 54 0.0 1.9 59.3 38.9 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 58 0.0 1.7 58.6 39.7 3.4 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 56 3.6 19.6 51.8 25.0 3.0 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 55 0.0 10.9 56.4 32.7 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 3.2 12.9 64.5 19.4 3.0 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 56 0.0 5.4 55.4 39.3 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 56 0.0 10.7 51.8 37.5 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 56 0.0 3.6 62.5 33.9 3.3 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 56 5.4 39.3 42.9 12.5 2.6 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 58 3.4 15.5 51.7 29.3 3.1 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 58 0.0 8.6 43.1 48.3 3.4 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 37 0.0 13.5 48.6 37.8 3.2 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 37 5.4 16.2 51.4 27.0 3.0 0.82 34. Instructor explained expectations 36 0.0 11.1 58.3 30.6 3.2 0.62 35. Instructor helped with my problems 36 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.72 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 38 5.3 23.7 52.6 18.4 2.8 0.79 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 75 Number of forms scanned = 73 Number of forms with at least one student response = 59 Percent completed = 78.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 233 002A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 33 68.8 Sophomore 18 36.0 B 14 29.2 Junior 18 36.0 C 1 2.1 Senior 11 22.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 4.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 12.2 Studies Program 1 2.0 2 hours 17 34.7 Required by my major 43 87.8 3 hours 13 26.5 Other (e.g. elective) 5 10.2 4 - 5 hours 8 16.3 6 - 7 hours 1 2.0 8 or more hours 4 8.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 54 0.0 5.6 57.4 37.0 3.3 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 6.3 15.6 56.3 21.9 2.9 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 48 2.1 2.1 75.0 20.8 3.1 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 54 1.9 9.3 61.1 27.8 3.1 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 51 3.9 7.8 66.7 21.6 3.1 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 50 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 0.0 6.5 67.4 26.1 3.2 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 41 2.4 31.7 51.2 14.6 2.8 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 54 1.9 7.4 48.1 42.6 3.3 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 54 0.0 1.9 44.4 53.7 3.5 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 50 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 54 0.0 3.7 59.3 37.0 3.3 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 50 8.0 26.0 48.0 18.0 2.8 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 53 0.0 17.0 54.7 28.3 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 0.0 1.9 63.5 34.6 3.3 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 51 0.0 2.0 62.7 35.3 3.3 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 53 1.9 1.9 71.7 24.5 3.2 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 49 6.1 40.8 40.8 12.2 2.6 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 53 3.8 11.3 62.3 22.6 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 52 3.8 7.7 48.1 40.4 3.3 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 43 2.3 16.3 55.8 25.6 3.0 0.72 33. Amount of work appropriate 44 6.8 11.4 65.9 15.9 2.9 0.74 34. Instructor explained expectations 43 2.3 20.9 53.5 23.3 3.0 0.74 35. Instructor helped with my problems 42 2.4 21.4 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.78 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 44 11.4 22.7 50.0 15.9 2.7 0.88 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 74 Number of forms scanned = 70 Number of forms with at least one student response = 54 Percent completed = 73.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 233 003A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 54.2 Sophomore 16 64.0 B 8 33.3 Junior 5 20.0 C 3 12.5 Senior 3 12.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 16.0 Required by my major 24 100.0 3 hours 9 36.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 16.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 12.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 3.6 0.0 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 14.3 7.1 50.0 28.6 2.9 1.00 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 8.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 7.1 0.0 64.3 28.6 3.1 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 11.1 7.4 55.6 25.9 3.0 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 11.1 7.4 55.6 25.9 3.0 0.90 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 11.1 7.4 59.3 22.2 2.9 0.87 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 14.3 9.5 47.6 28.6 2.9 1.00 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 3.6 7.1 60.7 28.6 3.1 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 3.6 3.6 39.3 53.6 3.4 0.74 11. Was available for consultation 27 3.7 0.0 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 3.6 3.6 46.4 46.4 3.4 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 11.5 23.1 38.5 26.9 2.8 0.98 14. Encouraged class participation 28 7.1 17.9 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 15.0 10.0 45.0 30.0 2.9 1.02 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 10.7 0.0 53.6 35.7 3.1 0.89 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 10.7 3.6 53.6 32.1 3.1 0.90 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 7.1 3.6 57.1 32.1 3.1 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 24.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 2.4 1.08 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 7.1 21.4 42.9 28.6 2.9 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 3.6 7.1 46.4 42.9 3.3 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 15 6.7 0.0 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.77 33. Amount of work appropriate 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 34. Instructor explained expectations 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 35. Instructor helped with my problems 15 6.7 13.3 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.88 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 15 6.7 26.7 40.0 26.7 2.9 0.92 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 90.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 236 001L1 SURVEY OF ORGANIC CHEM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.3 A 5 26.3 Sophomore 6 31.6 B 3 15.8 Junior 6 31.6 C 9 47.4 Senior 5 26.3 D 1 5.3 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 18 94.7 3 hours 9 47.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 4.5 77.3 13.6 3.0 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 0.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 22 4.5 0.0 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 9.5 9.5 52.4 28.6 3.0 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 9.5 47.6 38.1 4.8 2.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 23.8 71.4 3.7 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 55.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 001A2 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Savas, Meral ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 59 77.6 A 18 24.0 Sophomore 7 9.2 B 37 49.3 Junior 3 3.9 C 19 25.3 Senior 3 3.9 D 1 1.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 1.3 I 0 0.0 Other 3 3.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 2.7 Studies Program 1 1.3 2 hours 9 12.0 Required by my major 71 94.7 3 hours 11 14.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 4.0 4 - 5 hours 25 33.3 6 - 7 hours 19 25.3 8 or more hours 9 12.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 79 7.6 7.6 68.4 16.5 2.9 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 77 6.5 11.7 61.0 20.8 3.0 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 79 3.8 8.9 75.9 11.4 2.9 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 80 12.5 17.5 52.5 17.5 2.8 0.89 5. Grading was fair and consistent 79 15.2 19.0 57.0 8.9 2.6 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 80 2.5 17.5 61.3 18.8 3.0 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 78 2.6 3.8 62.8 30.8 3.2 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 74 9.5 21.6 52.7 16.2 2.8 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 70 7.1 25.7 60.0 7.1 2.7 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 71 0.0 14.1 73.2 12.7 3.0 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 71 2.8 5.6 70.4 21.1 3.1 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 66 7.6 10.6 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 71 21.1 29.6 46.5 2.8 2.3 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 65 16.9 26.2 50.8 6.2 2.5 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 53 11.3 32.1 54.7 1.9 2.5 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 80 6.3 8.8 61.3 23.8 3.0 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 77 2.6 11.7 66.2 19.5 3.0 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 79 2.5 6.3 72.2 19.0 3.1 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 78 23.1 37.2 37.2 2.6 2.2 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 80 7.5 38.8 41.3 12.5 2.6 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 80 18.8 31.3 41.3 8.8 2.4 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 50.0 16.7 16.7 2.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 16.7 33.3 16.7 33.3 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 62 9.7 21.0 58.1 11.3 2.7 0.80 33. Amount of work appropriate 63 15.9 41.3 38.1 4.8 2.3 0.80 34. Instructor explained expectations 61 13.1 21.3 50.8 14.8 2.7 0.89 35. Instructor helped with my problems 57 15.8 19.3 42.1 22.8 2.7 1.00 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 62 1.6 9.7 59.7 29.0 3.2 0.66 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 91 Number of forms scanned = 91 Number of forms with at least one student response = 80 Percent completed = 87.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. *********************************************************