1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that the College of Fine Arts uses a unique form * * * * The results include: * * * Overall college, departments, course prefix and individual courses * * * * This does not include: * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * * * To view a specifie course or instructor, please use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 501 17.6 A 1,932 69.3 Sophomore 620 21.7 B 665 23.9 Junior 704 24.7 C 129 4.6 Senior 791 27.7 D 16 0.6 Graduate 194 6.8 E/Fail 3 0.1 Professional 4 0.1 I 3 0.1 Other 37 1.3 Pass or Audit 39 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 614 21.7 Studies Program 516 18.2 1 - 3 hours 1,349 47.6 Required by my major 1,664 58.8 4 - 6 hours 534 18.9 Other (e.g. elective) 648 22.9 7 - 10 hours 173 6.1 over 10 hours 162 5.7 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 659 23.4 1 - 3 times 1,823 64.7 4 - 6 times 281 10.0 7 - 9 times 31 1.1 over 9 times 23 0.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 2,986 1.0 5.0 37.3 56.7 3.5 0.64 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 2,998 0.2 0.9 24.3 74.6 3.7 0.47 3. Arrived for class on time 2,994 0.5 3.7 29.3 66.5 3.6 0.59 4. Used class time efficiently 2,997 1.1 5.8 34.2 58.9 3.5 0.66 5. Exhibited respect for students 2,991 0.7 3.6 29.6 66.1 3.6 0.60 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 2,854 1.4 5.5 34.8 58.3 3.5 0.67 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 2,991 0.5 3.4 35.4 60.6 3.6 0.59 8. Encouraged student participation 2,963 0.3 3.0 33.9 62.8 3.6 0.57 9. Assignments helped understanding 2,730 1.0 5.4 36.2 57.4 3.5 0.65 10. Grading was fair and consistent 2,861 0.9 3.8 36.0 59.2 3.5 0.62 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 2,550 0.9 4.4 37.8 56.8 3.5 0.63 12. Available outside of class for help 2,772 0.4 2.9 38.1 58.5 3.5 0.58 13. Challenged me to think artistically 2,969 1.3 4.8 32.5 61.4 3.5 0.65 14. Stimulated interest in subject 2,962 2.6 7.5 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.74 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 2,594 2.2 13.1 38.3 46.5 3.3 0.77 16. I gained understanding in subject 2,925 0.9 3.5 39.8 55.8 3.5 0.61 17. I learned to respect differnt views 2,770 1.0 5.0 43.1 51.0 3.4 0.64 18. Challenged me to think artistically 2,913 1.2 4.9 34.5 59.5 3.5 0.65 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 2,887 1.0 4.8 36.4 57.7 3.5 0.64 20. Stimulated me to read further 2,847 3.2 15.2 33.9 47.8 3.3 0.83 21. Would recommend based on content 2,874 3.3 8.7 33.2 54.8 3.4 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 1,347 1.2 5.3 32.9 60.6 3.5 0.65 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 1,302 1.0 6.1 35.9 57.1 3.5 0.66 24. Instr helped me develop goals 1,276 1.5 8.9 34.6 55.0 3.4 0.72 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 1,247 1.4 5.1 32.1 61.4 3.5 0.66 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 639 0.5 3.4 25.4 70.7 3.7 0.57 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 607 0.5 2.8 24.1 72.7 3.7 0.55 28. Instr comments were pertinent 613 0.7 2.6 24.3 72.4 3.7 0.55 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 602 0.8 3.7 24.4 71.1 3.7 0.59 Number of forms preslugged = at least 4003 Number of forms scanned = 3049 Number of forms with at least one student response = 3016 Percent completed = 75.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Arts Administration SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 7.2 A 53 76.8 Sophomore 14 20.3 B 13 18.8 Junior 25 36.2 C 2 2.9 Senior 25 36.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 25 36.2 Studies Program 1 1.4 1 - 3 hours 30 43.5 Required by my major 58 84.1 4 - 6 hours 13 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 10 14.5 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 1 1.4 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 18 26.1 1 - 3 times 44 63.8 4 - 6 times 6 8.7 7 - 9 times 1 1.4 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 73 2.7 6.8 58.9 31.5 3.2 0.68 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 73 0.0 2.7 39.7 57.5 3.5 0.55 3. Arrived for class on time 73 0.0 5.5 43.8 50.7 3.5 0.60 4. Used class time efficiently 73 1.4 4.1 49.3 45.2 3.4 0.64 5. Exhibited respect for students 73 0.0 4.1 43.8 52.1 3.5 0.58 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 72 5.6 4.2 43.1 47.2 3.3 0.80 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 73 0.0 1.4 45.2 53.4 3.5 0.53 8. Encouraged student participation 73 0.0 1.4 39.7 58.9 3.6 0.52 9. Assignments helped understanding 68 2.9 4.4 45.6 47.1 3.4 0.71 10. Grading was fair and consistent 65 3.1 6.2 50.8 40.0 3.3 0.72 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 62 1.6 0.0 51.6 46.8 3.4 0.59 12. Available outside of class for help 69 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.58 13. Challenged me to think artistically 72 4.2 1.4 54.2 40.3 3.3 0.70 14. Stimulated interest in subject 73 2.7 6.8 50.7 39.7 3.3 0.71 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 67 0.0 19.4 56.7 23.9 3.0 0.66 16. I gained understanding in subject 70 0.0 5.7 50.0 44.3 3.4 0.60 17. I learned to respect differnt views 68 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.57 18. Challenged me to think artistically 70 0.0 7.1 54.3 38.6 3.3 0.60 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 68 0.0 7.4 58.8 33.8 3.3 0.59 20. Stimulated me to read further 70 2.9 21.4 48.6 27.1 3.0 0.78 21. Would recommend based on content 68 2.9 10.3 52.9 33.8 3.2 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 91 Number of forms scanned = 73 Number of forms with at least one student response = 73 Percent completed = 80.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 67 8.3 A 454 57.6 Sophomore 148 18.2 B 263 33.4 Junior 227 28.0 C 49 6.2 Senior 318 39.2 D 8 1.0 Graduate 31 3.8 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 2 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 18 2.2 Pass or Audit 13 1.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 87 10.8 Studies Program 84 10.5 1 - 3 hours 376 46.7 Required by my major 517 64.5 4 - 6 hours 212 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 200 25.0 7 - 10 hours 73 9.1 over 10 hours 58 7.2 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 183 23.0 1 - 3 times 521 65.4 4 - 6 times 75 9.4 7 - 9 times 14 1.8 over 9 times 4 0.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 855 0.9 4.7 45.5 48.9 3.4 0.63 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 860 0.2 1.0 26.6 72.1 3.7 0.49 3. Arrived for class on time 859 0.6 5.2 31.8 62.4 3.6 0.62 4. Used class time efficiently 860 1.3 5.6 39.3 53.8 3.5 0.66 5. Exhibited respect for students 854 1.9 5.0 32.8 60.3 3.5 0.68 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 847 1.1 9.0 38.8 51.1 3.4 0.70 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 857 1.1 5.1 42.6 51.2 3.4 0.64 8. Encouraged student participation 855 0.2 3.2 39.5 57.1 3.5 0.57 9. Assignments helped understanding 816 0.6 5.1 40.0 54.3 3.5 0.62 10. Grading was fair and consistent 818 0.9 5.7 44.9 48.5 3.4 0.64 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 770 0.5 3.4 43.4 52.7 3.5 0.59 12. Available outside of class for help 788 0.8 3.7 42.5 53.0 3.5 0.61 13. Challenged me to think artistically 852 0.9 3.6 34.9 60.6 3.6 0.61 14. Stimulated interest in subject 847 1.8 9.2 29.6 59.4 3.5 0.73 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 767 1.0 12.8 44.6 41.6 3.3 0.72 16. I gained understanding in subject 852 0.5 2.8 44.6 52.1 3.5 0.58 17. I learned to respect differnt views 802 0.5 5.4 48.1 46.0 3.4 0.61 18. Challenged me to think artistically 848 0.9 3.9 36.0 59.2 3.5 0.62 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 842 0.8 4.6 36.8 57.7 3.5 0.63 20. Stimulated me to read further 831 2.8 17.6 33.9 45.7 3.2 0.83 21. Would recommend based on content 835 2.9 10.2 35.2 51.7 3.4 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 566 1.2 7.8 36.6 54.4 3.4 0.69 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 548 1.3 9.5 39.6 49.6 3.4 0.71 24. Instr helped me develop goals 534 1.3 13.3 37.8 47.6 3.3 0.75 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 536 1.5 6.5 35.3 56.7 3.5 0.69 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 75 2.7 9.3 28.0 60.0 3.5 0.78 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 55 3.6 3.6 25.5 67.3 3.6 0.74 28. Instr comments were pertinent 63 3.2 4.8 22.2 69.8 3.6 0.73 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 51 2.0 3.9 17.6 76.5 3.7 0.65 Number of forms preslugged = at least 1183 Number of forms scanned = 871 Number of forms with at least one student response = 864 Percent completed = 73.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Music SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 353 22.0 A 1,154 73.6 Sophomore 369 23.0 B 318 20.3 Junior 367 22.9 C 58 3.7 Senior 345 21.5 D 8 0.5 Graduate 148 9.2 E/Fail 2 0.1 Professional 2 0.1 I 3 0.2 Other 17 1.1 Pass or Audit 25 1.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 390 24.4 Studies Program 291 18.3 1 - 3 hours 774 48.5 Required by my major 926 58.1 4 - 6 hours 240 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 376 23.6 7 - 10 hours 89 5.6 over 10 hours 103 6.5 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 413 26.1 1 - 3 times 976 61.6 4 - 6 times 163 10.3 7 - 9 times 14 0.9 over 9 times 19 1.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 1,661 0.8 5.1 31.8 62.4 3.6 0.63 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 1,666 0.2 0.8 21.3 77.7 3.8 0.45 3. Arrived for class on time 1,662 0.7 3.4 27.4 68.5 3.6 0.58 4. Used class time efficiently 1,665 0.9 5.7 30.6 62.8 3.6 0.64 5. Exhibited respect for students 1,665 0.3 3.1 26.6 70.0 3.7 0.55 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 1,536 0.8 3.4 31.8 64.0 3.6 0.60 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 1,660 0.3 2.6 30.8 66.3 3.6 0.55 8. Encouraged student participation 1,634 0.4 2.9 31.0 65.8 3.6 0.56 9. Assignments helped understanding 1,447 0.8 5.4 33.0 60.8 3.5 0.63 10. Grading was fair and consistent 1,582 0.4 2.3 31.2 66.1 3.6 0.55 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 1,328 1.0 4.7 33.2 61.1 3.5 0.63 12. Available outside of class for help 1,553 0.1 2.3 35.0 62.7 3.6 0.54 13. Challenged me to think artistically 1,653 0.9 5.2 30.2 63.6 3.6 0.64 14. Stimulated interest in subject 1,651 2.7 6.1 28.8 62.4 3.5 0.73 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 1,403 2.2 11.8 34.1 51.8 3.4 0.77 16. I gained understanding in subject 1,612 1.1 3.4 35.4 60.1 3.5 0.62 17. I learned to respect differnt views 1,520 1.2 3.9 38.9 55.9 3.5 0.63 18. Challenged me to think artistically 1,604 1.2 4.8 31.8 62.2 3.5 0.65 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 1,589 0.9 4.9 33.7 60.4 3.5 0.64 20. Stimulated me to read further 1,557 3.1 13.0 32.4 51.5 3.3 0.82 21. Would recommend based on content 1,580 3.0 7.7 30.4 58.9 3.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 549 0.9 3.8 27.9 67.4 3.6 0.61 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 525 0.6 3.4 30.3 65.7 3.6 0.58 24. Instr helped me develop goals 516 1.4 5.2 29.1 64.3 3.6 0.66 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 491 1.4 3.9 25.9 68.8 3.6 0.63 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 499 0.2 2.8 24.0 72.9 3.7 0.53 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 494 0.0 3.0 22.7 74.3 3.7 0.52 28. Instr comments were pertinent 492 0.4 2.2 23.8 73.6 3.7 0.53 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 490 0.8 3.9 23.9 71.4 3.7 0.59 Number of forms preslugged = at least 2171 Number of forms scanned = 1688 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1676 Percent completed = 77.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Theatre SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 76 20.5 A 271 74.9 Sophomore 89 24.1 B 71 19.6 Junior 85 23.0 C 20 5.5 Senior 103 27.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 15 4.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 112 31.0 Studies Program 140 38.4 1 - 3 hours 169 46.8 Required by my major 163 44.7 4 - 6 hours 69 19.1 Other (e.g. elective) 62 17.0 7 - 10 hours 11 3.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 45 12.3 1 - 3 times 282 77.0 4 - 6 times 37 10.1 7 - 9 times 2 0.5 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 397 1.8 5.3 38.8 54.2 3.5 0.68 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 399 0.0 1.0 28.8 70.2 3.7 0.48 3. Arrived for class on time 400 0.0 1.3 29.3 69.5 3.7 0.49 4. Used class time efficiently 399 1.8 7.0 35.3 55.9 3.5 0.70 5. Exhibited respect for students 399 0.3 2.8 32.3 64.7 3.6 0.55 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 399 3.8 6.5 36.1 53.6 3.4 0.77 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 401 0.5 3.5 37.4 58.6 3.5 0.59 8. Encouraged student participation 401 0.2 3.7 32.4 63.6 3.6 0.58 9. Assignments helped understanding 399 2.5 6.0 38.3 53.1 3.4 0.72 10. Grading was fair and consistent 396 2.5 5.6 34.8 57.1 3.5 0.72 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 390 1.5 5.9 40.5 52.1 3.4 0.68 12. Available outside of class for help 362 1.1 3.9 40.1 55.0 3.5 0.63 13. Challenged me to think artistically 392 3.1 6.4 32.9 57.7 3.5 0.75 14. Stimulated interest in subject 391 3.8 10.0 31.7 54.5 3.4 0.81 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 357 4.8 17.6 37.5 40.1 3.1 0.87 16. I gained understanding in subject 391 1.3 5.1 45.5 48.1 3.4 0.65 17. I learned to respect differnt views 380 1.3 8.2 46.1 44.5 3.3 0.68 18. Challenged me to think artistically 391 1.5 6.9 38.9 52.7 3.4 0.69 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 388 2.1 4.6 42.3 51.0 3.4 0.68 20. Stimulated me to read further 389 4.4 17.7 37.0 40.9 3.1 0.86 21. Would recommend based on content 391 5.4 9.5 36.8 48.3 3.3 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 226 1.8 3.1 34.5 60.6 3.5 0.65 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 225 1.3 4.0 39.1 55.6 3.5 0.64 24. Instr helped me develop goals 221 2.3 6.8 38.9 52.0 3.4 0.72 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 217 1.4 4.1 37.8 56.7 3.5 0.65 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 64 0.0 1.6 31.3 67.2 3.7 0.51 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 57 1.8 0.0 33.3 64.9 3.6 0.59 28. Instr comments were pertinent 57 0.0 3.5 29.8 66.7 3.6 0.56 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 60 0.0 1.7 33.3 65.0 3.6 0.52 Number of forms preslugged = at least 558 Number of forms scanned = 417 Number of forms with at least one student response = 403 Percent completed = 72.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Arts Administration COURSE = AAD 201 001L1 INTRO TO ARTS ADMIN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Braun, Michael E. ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 14.3 A 10 47.6 Sophomore 6 28.6 B 9 42.9 Junior 10 47.6 C 2 9.5 Senior 2 9.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 11 52.4 Required by my major 21 100.0 4 - 6 hours 9 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 1 4.8 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 5 23.8 1 - 3 times 12 57.1 4 - 6 times 3 14.3 7 - 9 times 1 4.8 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 23 4.3 21.7 56.5 17.4 2.9 0.76 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 23 0.0 8.7 43.5 47.8 3.4 0.66 3. Arrived for class on time 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 4. Used class time efficiently 23 0.0 13.0 56.5 30.4 3.2 0.65 5. Exhibited respect for students 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 23 13.0 4.3 56.5 26.1 3.0 0.93 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 8. Encouraged student participation 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 9. Assignments helped understanding 23 4.3 8.7 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.81 10. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 13.0 56.5 26.1 3.0 0.77 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 12. Available outside of class for help 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 13. Challenged me to think artistically 23 8.7 4.3 60.9 26.1 3.0 0.82 14. Stimulated interest in subject 23 4.3 13.0 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.79 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 23 0.0 34.8 60.9 4.3 2.7 0.56 16. I gained understanding in subject 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 17. I learned to respect differnt views 23 0.0 13.0 73.9 13.0 3.0 0.52 18. Challenged me to think artistically 23 0.0 21.7 56.5 21.7 3.0 0.67 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 23 0.0 17.4 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.60 20. Stimulated me to read further 23 0.0 39.1 47.8 13.0 2.7 0.69 21. Would recommend based on content 22 9.1 18.2 59.1 13.6 2.8 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 74.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Arts Administration COURSE = AAD 402 001S1 TOPS IN ARTS ADMIN: PRODUCING ARTS PUBLICTN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nguyen, Trang ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.1 Junior 5 35.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 64.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 6 42.9 Studies Program 1 7.1 1 - 3 hours 7 50.0 Required by my major 6 42.9 4 - 6 hours 1 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 7 50.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 5 35.7 1 - 3 times 9 64.3 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 14 7.1 0.0 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.73 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 3. Arrived for class on time 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 4. Used class time efficiently 14 7.1 0.0 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.73 5. Exhibited respect for students 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 8. Encouraged student participation 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 9. Assignments helped understanding 14 7.1 0.0 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.73 10. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 14 7.1 0.0 57.1 35.7 3.2 0.80 12. Available outside of class for help 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 13. Challenged me to think artistically 14 7.1 0.0 64.3 28.6 3.1 0.77 14. Stimulated interest in subject 14 7.1 0.0 64.3 28.6 3.1 0.77 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 16. I gained understanding in subject 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 17. I learned to respect differnt views 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 18. Challenged me to think artistically 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 20. Stimulated me to read further 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 21. Would recommend based on content 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Arts Administration COURSE = AAD 101 001L1 ARTS ADMIN PROFESSIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Paige, Roger L ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.0 A 18 90.0 Sophomore 5 25.0 B 2 10.0 Junior 5 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 18 90.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 2 10.0 Required by my major 18 90.0 4 - 6 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 7 35.0 1 - 3 times 13 65.0 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 3. Arrived for class on time 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 4. Used class time efficiently 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Exhibited respect for students 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Encouraged student participation 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 9. Assignments helped understanding 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 10. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 12. Available outside of class for help 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 13. Challenged me to think artistically 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 14. Stimulated interest in subject 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 19 0.0 21.1 42.1 36.8 3.2 0.76 16. I gained understanding in subject 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 17. I learned to respect differnt views 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 18. Challenged me to think artistically 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 20. Stimulated me to read further 20 0.0 15.0 45.0 40.0 3.3 0.72 21. Would recommend based on content 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 81.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Arts Administration COURSE = AAD 320 001L1 FUND RAISING F/T ARTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Paige, Roger L ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 92.9 Sophomore 3 21.4 B 1 7.1 Junior 5 35.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 42.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 10 71.4 Required by my major 13 92.9 4 - 6 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 1 7.1 1 - 3 times 10 71.4 4 - 6 times 3 21.4 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 3. Arrived for class on time 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 4. Used class time efficiently 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 5. Exhibited respect for students 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 8. Encouraged student participation 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 9. Assignments helped understanding 14 0.0 7.1 7.1 85.7 3.8 0.58 10. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 12. Available outside of class for help 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 13. Challenged me to think artistically 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 14. Stimulated interest in subject 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 16. I gained understanding in subject 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 17. I learned to respect differnt views 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 18. Challenged me to think artistically 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 20. Stimulated me to read further 14 14.3 21.4 21.4 42.9 2.9 1.14 21. Would recommend based on content 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-E 270 004L1 INTRODUCTION TO ART EDUC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Kate ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 90.0 Sophomore 3 30.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 5 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 1 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 8 80.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 4 - 6 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 2 22.2 1 - 3 times 7 77.8 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 3. Arrived for class on time 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Used class time efficiently 12 8.3 8.3 16.7 66.7 3.4 1.00 5. Exhibited respect for students 12 8.3 0.0 8.3 83.3 3.7 0.89 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 12 8.3 8.3 16.7 66.7 3.4 1.00 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 12 8.3 0.0 8.3 83.3 3.7 0.89 8. Encouraged student participation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 9. Assignments helped understanding 12 0.0 8.3 8.3 83.3 3.8 0.62 10. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 12. Available outside of class for help 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 13. Challenged me to think artistically 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 14. Stimulated interest in subject 12 8.3 0.0 25.0 66.7 3.5 0.90 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 10 10.0 0.0 30.0 60.0 3.4 0.97 16. I gained understanding in subject 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 17. I learned to respect differnt views 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 18. Challenged me to think artistically 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 20. Stimulated me to read further 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 21. Would recommend based on content 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 3.7 0.65 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 24. Instr helped me develop goals 11 0.0 18.2 9.1 72.7 3.5 0.82 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-E 272 001L1 WORKSHOP IN DESIGN EDUC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Richards, Allan ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 94.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 11 64.7 C 1 5.9 Senior 6 35.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 1 5.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 15 88.2 Required by my major 17 100.0 4 - 6 hours 1 5.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 11 64.7 1 - 3 times 5 29.4 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 3. Arrived for class on time 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 4. Used class time efficiently 17 0.0 41.2 41.2 17.6 2.8 0.75 5. Exhibited respect for students 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 17 5.9 17.6 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.73 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 8. Encouraged student participation 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 9. Assignments helped understanding 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 10. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 29.4 64.7 5.9 2.8 0.56 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 12. Available outside of class for help 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 13. Challenged me to think artistically 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 14. Stimulated interest in subject 17 0.0 35.3 58.8 5.9 2.7 0.59 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 12 0.0 58.3 41.7 0.0 2.4 0.51 16. I gained understanding in subject 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 17. I learned to respect differnt views 15 0.0 6.7 93.3 0.0 2.9 0.26 18. Challenged me to think artistically 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 16 0.0 12.5 81.3 6.3 2.9 0.44 20. Stimulated me to read further 16 0.0 93.8 6.3 0.0 2.1 0.25 21. Would recommend based on content 15 6.7 73.3 20.0 0.0 2.1 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 14 7.1 14.3 71.4 7.1 2.8 0.70 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 14 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 0.47 24. Instr helped me develop goals 14 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 0.51 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 14 7.1 21.4 64.3 7.1 2.7 0.73 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 89.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-E 272 002L1 WORKSHOP IN DESIGN EDUC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Richards, Allan ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 60.0 Sophomore 2 12.5 B 6 40.0 Junior 7 43.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 43.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 2 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 10 62.5 Required by my major 15 93.8 4 - 6 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 5 31.3 1 - 3 times 11 68.8 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 3. Arrived for class on time 16 0.0 6.3 18.8 75.0 3.7 0.60 4. Used class time efficiently 16 0.0 18.8 43.8 37.5 3.2 0.75 5. Exhibited respect for students 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 16 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73 8. Encouraged student participation 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 9. Assignments helped understanding 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 10. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.68 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Available outside of class for help 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Challenged me to think artistically 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 14. Stimulated interest in subject 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 13 7.7 46.2 30.8 15.4 2.5 0.88 16. I gained understanding in subject 16 6.3 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.82 17. I learned to respect differnt views 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 18. Challenged me to think artistically 16 6.3 6.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.77 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 16 6.3 18.8 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.93 20. Stimulated me to read further 16 18.8 50.0 25.0 6.3 2.2 0.83 21. Would recommend based on content 16 12.5 37.5 43.8 6.3 2.4 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 24. Instr helped me develop goals 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-E 577 001L1 ART IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Richards, Allan ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 4 - 6 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 7 - 10 hours 4 80.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 3 60.0 1 - 3 times 2 40.0 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Arrived for class on time 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Used class time efficiently 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 5. Exhibited respect for students 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Encouraged student participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 9. Assignments helped understanding 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 10. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Available outside of class for help 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Challenged me to think artistically 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Stimulated interest in subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. I gained understanding in subject 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 17. I learned to respect differnt views 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Challenged me to think artistically 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 20. Stimulated me to read further 5 40.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 2.4 . 21. Would recommend based on content 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-E 270 001L1 INTRODUCTION TO ART EDUC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Szekely, George ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 94.4 Sophomore 3 16.7 B 1 5.6 Junior 11 61.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 22.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 6 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 10 55.6 Required by my major 18 100.0 4 - 6 hours 2 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 9 50.0 1 - 3 times 9 50.0 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 3. Arrived for class on time 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 4. Used class time efficiently 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 5. Exhibited respect for students 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 8. Encouraged student participation 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 9. Assignments helped understanding 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 10. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 12. Available outside of class for help 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 13. Challenged me to think artistically 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 14. Stimulated interest in subject 19 0.0 5.3 0.0 94.7 3.9 0.46 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 16. I gained understanding in subject 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 17. I learned to respect differnt views 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 18. Challenged me to think artistically 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 20. Stimulated me to read further 19 0.0 5.3 5.3 89.5 3.8 0.50 21. Would recommend based on content 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 24. Instr helped me develop goals 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-E 270 003L1 INTRODUCTION TO ART EDUC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Szekely, George ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 89.5 Sophomore 3 15.0 B 2 10.5 Junior 15 75.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 4 21.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 11 57.9 Required by my major 20 100.0 4 - 6 hours 4 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 12 63.2 1 - 3 times 7 36.8 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 3. Arrived for class on time 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 4. Used class time efficiently 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 5. Exhibited respect for students 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 8. Encouraged student participation 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 9. Assignments helped understanding 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 10. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Available outside of class for help 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 13. Challenged me to think artistically 22 0.0 4.5 0.0 95.5 3.9 0.43 14. Stimulated interest in subject 21 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 16. I gained understanding in subject 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 17. I learned to respect differnt views 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 18. Challenged me to think artistically 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 21 0.0 0.0 4.8 95.2 4.0 0.22 20. Stimulated me to read further 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 21. Would recommend based on content 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 95.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-E 579 001S1 SEMINAR IN ART EDUCATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Unseld, Teresa ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 2 50.0 Required by my major 4 100.0 4 - 6 hours 1 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 1 25.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 1 25.0 1 - 3 times 3 75.0 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Arrived for class on time 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Used class time efficiently 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 5. Exhibited respect for students 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 8. Encouraged student participation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 9. Assignments helped understanding 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 10. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Available outside of class for help 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 13. Challenged me to think artistically 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 14. Stimulated interest in subject 4 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 2.3 . SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. I gained understanding in subject 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 17. I learned to respect differnt views 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 18. Challenged me to think artistically 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 20. Stimulated me to read further 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 21. Would recommend based on content 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 4 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-H 106 401L1 RENAISSANCE - MODERN ART INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clarke, Cynthia ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.0 A 8 42.1 Sophomore 3 15.0 B 9 47.4 Junior 11 55.0 C 1 5.3 Senior 5 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 2 10.5 Studies Program 5 25.0 1 - 3 hours 13 68.4 Required by my major 11 55.0 4 - 6 hours 4 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 4 20.0 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 5 25.0 1 - 3 times 13 65.0 4 - 6 times 2 10.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 3. Arrived for class on time 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 4. Used class time efficiently 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 5. Exhibited respect for students 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 22 0.0 13.6 31.8 54.5 3.4 0.73 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 22 0.0 22.7 22.7 54.5 3.3 0.84 8. Encouraged student participation 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 9. Assignments helped understanding 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 10. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 12. Available outside of class for help 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 13. Challenged me to think artistically 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 14. Stimulated interest in subject 21 0.0 9.5 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 16 0.0 18.8 37.5 43.8 3.3 0.77 16. I gained understanding in subject 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 17. I learned to respect differnt views 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 18. Challenged me to think artistically 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 20. Stimulated me to read further 21 4.8 19.0 42.9 33.3 3.0 0.86 21. Would recommend based on content 19 5.3 15.8 42.1 36.8 3.1 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-H 322 001L1 BYZANTINE ART INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Havice, Christine ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 30.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 7 33.3 C 5 25.0 Senior 13 61.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.8 Pass or Audit 1 5.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 1 4.8 Studies Program 1 4.8 1 - 3 hours 11 52.4 Required by my major 18 85.7 4 - 6 hours 8 38.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 7 - 10 hours 1 4.8 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 5 23.8 1 - 3 times 15 71.4 4 - 6 times 1 4.8 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 3. Arrived for class on time 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 4. Used class time efficiently 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 5. Exhibited respect for students 22 0.0 13.6 36.4 50.0 3.4 0.73 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 22 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.68 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 8. Encouraged student participation 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 9. Assignments helped understanding 22 0.0 18.2 40.9 40.9 3.2 0.75 10. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 12. Available outside of class for help 22 0.0 13.6 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.72 13. Challenged me to think artistically 22 4.5 4.5 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.78 14. Stimulated interest in subject 21 4.8 19.0 33.3 42.9 3.1 0.91 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 16. I gained understanding in subject 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 17. I learned to respect differnt views 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 18. Challenged me to think artistically 22 4.5 4.5 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.77 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 20. Stimulated me to read further 22 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.73 21. Would recommend based on content 22 4.5 27.3 40.9 27.3 2.9 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 57.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-H 105 001L1 ANCIENT - MEDIEVAL ART INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holdren, Michael ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 3.7 A 15 57.7 Sophomore 14 51.9 B 11 42.3 Junior 6 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 18.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 1 3.8 Studies Program 12 46.2 1 - 3 hours 22 84.6 Required by my major 8 30.8 4 - 6 hours 2 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 23.1 7 - 10 hours 1 3.8 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 6 23.1 1 - 3 times 19 73.1 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 1 3.8 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 3. Arrived for class on time 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 4. Used class time efficiently 31 0.0 3.2 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.57 5. Exhibited respect for students 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 31 0.0 6.5 35.5 58.1 3.5 0.63 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 31 0.0 0.0 61.3 38.7 3.4 0.50 8. Encouraged student participation 31 0.0 6.5 48.4 45.2 3.4 0.62 9. Assignments helped understanding 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 10. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 3.4 0.50 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 12. Available outside of class for help 30 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Challenged me to think artistically 31 0.0 3.2 25.8 71.0 3.7 0.54 14. Stimulated interest in subject 31 3.2 6.5 19.4 71.0 3.6 0.76 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 26 3.8 11.5 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.66 16. I gained understanding in subject 30 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 17. I learned to respect differnt views 30 0.0 3.3 56.7 40.0 3.4 0.56 18. Challenged me to think artistically 30 3.3 3.3 30.0 63.3 3.5 0.73 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 30 3.3 3.3 30.0 63.3 3.5 0.73 20. Stimulated me to read further 30 3.3 23.3 30.0 43.3 3.1 0.90 21. Would recommend based on content 29 3.4 10.3 27.6 58.6 3.4 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 79.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-H 105 002L1 ANCIENT - MEDIEVAL ART INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holdren, Michael ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 7.1 A 12 41.4 Sophomore 13 46.4 B 16 55.2 Junior 11 39.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 7.1 D 1 3.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 3 10.3 Studies Program 12 44.4 1 - 3 hours 20 69.0 Required by my major 13 48.1 4 - 6 hours 5 17.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 7.4 7 - 10 hours 1 3.4 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 9 31.0 1 - 3 times 20 69.0 4 - 6 times 0 0.0 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 33 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 33 0.0 0.0 15.2 84.8 3.8 0.36 3. Arrived for class on time 33 3.0 9.1 39.4 48.5 3.3 0.78 4. Used class time efficiently 33 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 5. Exhibited respect for students 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 33 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 33 0.0 0.0 39.4 60.6 3.6 0.50 8. Encouraged student participation 32 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 9. Assignments helped understanding 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 10. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 12. Available outside of class for help 33 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.45 13. Challenged me to think artistically 33 0.0 0.0 30.3 69.7 3.7 0.47 14. Stimulated interest in subject 33 0.0 0.0 30.3 69.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 27 0.0 18.5 48.1 33.3 3.1 0.72 16. I gained understanding in subject 31 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 3.7 0.48 17. I learned to respect differnt views 30 0.0 3.3 53.3 43.3 3.4 0.56 18. Challenged me to think artistically 31 0.0 3.2 32.3 64.5 3.6 0.56 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 30 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 3.6 0.49 20. Stimulated me to read further 31 3.2 9.7 35.5 51.6 3.4 0.80 21. Would recommend based on content 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 24. Instr helped me develop goals 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 86.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-H 105 003L1 ANCIENT - MEDIEVAL ART INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holdren, Michael ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 13.8 A 7 25.0 Sophomore 11 37.9 B 18 64.3 Junior 8 27.6 C 2 7.1 Senior 5 17.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.4 Pass or Audit 1 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 5 17.9 Studies Program 3 11.1 1 - 3 hours 19 67.9 Required by my major 20 74.1 4 - 6 hours 4 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 14.8 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 7 25.0 1 - 3 times 18 64.3 4 - 6 times 3 10.7 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 29 0.0 0.0 3.4 96.6 4.0 0.19 3. Arrived for class on time 29 0.0 6.9 51.7 41.4 3.3 0.61 4. Used class time efficiently 29 0.0 0.0 27.6 72.4 3.7 0.45 5. Exhibited respect for students 29 0.0 0.0 17.2 82.8 3.8 0.38 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 29 0.0 10.3 31.0 58.6 3.5 0.69 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 29 0.0 3.4 20.7 75.9 3.7 0.53 8. Encouraged student participation 29 0.0 13.8 41.4 44.8 3.3 0.71 9. Assignments helped understanding 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 10. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.57 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 12. Available outside of class for help 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 13. Challenged me to think artistically 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 14. Stimulated interest in subject 29 0.0 3.4 44.8 51.7 3.5 0.57 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 25 0.0 36.0 56.0 8.0 2.7 0.61 16. I gained understanding in subject 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 17. I learned to respect differnt views 29 0.0 3.4 72.4 24.1 3.2 0.49 18. Challenged me to think artistically 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 29 0.0 3.4 31.0 65.5 3.6 0.56 20. Stimulated me to read further 29 0.0 24.1 44.8 31.0 3.1 0.75 21. Would recommend based on content 29 0.0 0.0 65.5 34.5 3.3 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 82.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-H 342 001L1 AMERICAN ART INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jensen, Robert ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 16.7 Sophomore 3 12.5 B 16 66.7 Junior 8 33.3 C 4 16.7 Senior 13 54.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 2 8.3 Studies Program 3 13.0 1 - 3 hours 14 58.3 Required by my major 17 73.9 4 - 6 hours 7 29.2 Other (e.g. elective) 3 13.0 7 - 10 hours 1 4.2 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 4 16.7 1 - 3 times 11 45.8 4 - 6 times 8 33.3 7 - 9 times 1 4.2 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 3. Arrived for class on time 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 4. Used class time efficiently 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 5. Exhibited respect for students 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 24 0.0 29.2 33.3 37.5 3.1 0.83 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 8. Encouraged student participation 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 9. Assignments helped understanding 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 10. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 12. Available outside of class for help 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 13. Challenged me to think artistically 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 14. Stimulated interest in subject 24 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 23 4.3 26.1 56.5 13.0 2.8 0.74 16. I gained understanding in subject 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 17. I learned to respect differnt views 23 0.0 13.0 47.8 39.1 3.3 0.69 18. Challenged me to think artistically 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 24 4.2 0.0 54.2 41.7 3.3 0.70 20. Stimulated me to read further 24 0.0 29.2 37.5 33.3 3.0 0.81 21. Would recommend based on content 24 12.5 12.5 45.8 29.2 2.9 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 61.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. *