****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 655 002O1 SP STUDY SYSTEMATIC GEO: QUALITATIVE METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bacchetta, Paola ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 14.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 87.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 14.3 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 100.0 4 - 5 hours 2 25.0 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 2 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 305 401L1 ELEMENTS OF CARTOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gilbreath, Richard ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 5 35.7 Junior 3 21.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 71.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 64.3 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 5 35.7 4 - 5 hours 6 42.9 6 - 7 hours 4 28.6 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 26.7 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 506 001L1 INTRO TO COMPUTER CARTOG INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gilbreath, Richard ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 70.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 10.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 80.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 5 50.0 8 or more hours 3 30.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 409G001L1 GIS AND SCI:FUNDAMENTALS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harvey, Francis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 38.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 38.5 Junior 4 30.8 C 2 15.4 Senior 5 38.5 D 1 7.7 Graduate 3 23.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 7.7 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.7 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 11 84.6 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 5 38.5 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 28.6 28.6 35.7 7.1 2.2 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 28.6 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.95 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 35.7 42.9 21.4 2.9 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.76 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 3.2 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 35.7 21.4 28.6 2.6 1.08 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 3.2 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 64.3 21.4 14.3 2.5 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 35.7 28.6 28.6 2.8 0.97 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 14.3 35.7 21.4 28.6 2.6 1.08. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GEO 160 402L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hopper, Hilary ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 35.7 A 12 80.0 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 3 20.0 Junior 2 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 21.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 66.7 Studies Program 11 78.6 2 hours 1 6.7 Required by my major 3 21.4 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 10.5 0.0 47.4 42.1 3.2 0.92 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 15.8 42.1 36.8 3.1 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 11.1 27.8 61.1 3.5 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 68 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 27.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 160 001L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Karan, P P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 15.2 A 12 26.7 Sophomore 16 34.8 B 21 46.7 Junior 13 28.3 C 8 17.8 Senior 8 17.4 D 4 8.9 Graduate 2 4.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 25 55.6 Studies Program 38 84.4 2 hours 11 24.4 Required by my major 3 6.7 3 hours 7 15.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 8.9 4 - 5 hours 1 2.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 50 0.0 10.0 66.0 24.0 3.1 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 47 21.3 27.7 42.6 8.5 2.4 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 46 8.7 19.6 67.4 4.3 2.7 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 50 8.0 20.0 60.0 12.0 2.8 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 50 6.0 10.0 66.0 18.0 3.0 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 46 8.7 10.9 60.9 19.6 2.9 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 50 10.0 28.0 52.0 10.0 2.6 0.81 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 34.2 36.8 26.3 2.6 2.0 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 50 10.0 34.0 46.0 10.0 2.6 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 50 2.0 2.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 49 2.0 6.1 77.6 14.3 3.0 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 50 0.0 18.0 62.0 20.0 3.0 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 50 22.0 24.0 46.0 8.0 2.4 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 50 4.0 22.0 60.0 14.0 2.8 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 47 8.5 14.9 68.1 8.5 2.8 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 46 8.7 47.8 39.1 4.3 2.4 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 44 11.4 54.5 27.3 6.8 2.3 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 6.3 16.7 64.6 12.5 2.8 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 49 22.4 38.8 32.7 6.1 2.2 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 50 14.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 2.5 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 50 12.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 2.6 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 19 15.8 47.4 31.6 5.3 2.3 0.81 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 29 13.8 37.9 41.4 6.9 2.4 0.82 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 28 3.6 28.6 60.7 7.1 2.7 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 27 3.7 14.8 59.3 22.2 3.0 0.73 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 75 Number of forms scanned = 50 Number of forms with at least one student response = 50 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 160 401L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Karan, P P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 23.8 A 3 14.3 Sophomore 4 19.0 B 12 57.1 Junior 5 23.8 C 5 23.8 Senior 5 23.8 D 1 4.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 4.8 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 23.8 Studies Program 16 76.2 2 hours 8 38.1 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 6 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 19.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 9.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 3.4 72.4 24.1 3.2 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 23.1 30.8 42.3 3.8 2.3 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 7.1 35.7 53.6 3.6 2.5 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 3.3 26.7 63.3 6.7 2.7 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 3.3 23.3 66.7 6.7 2.8 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 3.7 18.5 66.7 11.1 2.9 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 13.3 23.3 60.0 3.3 2.5 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 20.0 56.0 24.0 0.0 2.0 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 6.7 20.0 63.3 10.0 2.8 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 3.3 23.3 73.3 3.7 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 26 3.8 7.7 73.1 15.4 3.0 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 3.3 6.7 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 13.3 23.3 53.3 10.0 2.6 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 30 3.3 26.7 63.3 6.7 2.7 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 8.3 8.3 70.8 12.5 2.9 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 3.7 44.4 48.1 3.7 2.5 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 8.0 40.0 48.0 4.0 2.5 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 3.3 23.3 66.7 6.7 2.8 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 20.0 46.7 26.7 6.7 2.2 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 13.3 30.0 53.3 3.3 2.5 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 13.8 24.1 55.2 6.9 2.6 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.82 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 20.0 30.0 40.0 10.0 2.4 0.97 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 20.0 10.0 40.0 30.0 2.8 1.14 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 334 001L1 ENVIRON, SOC AND ECONOMY OF JAPAN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Karan, P P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 3 25.0 B 5 41.7 Junior 4 33.3 C 2 16.7 Senior 5 41.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 50.0 Studies Program 7 58.3 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 2 16.7 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 7.7 0.0 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.80 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 18.2 18.2 45.5 18.2 2.6 1.03 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 23.1 46.2 30.8 3.1 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 30.8 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 46.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 130 002L1 EARTH'S PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Phillips, Jonathan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 24.2 A 4 12.5 Sophomore 10 30.3 B 16 50.0 Junior 6 18.2 C 8 25.0 Senior 9 27.3 D 3 9.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 63.6 Studies Program 23 69.7 2 hours 8 24.2 Required by my major 4 12.1 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 18.2 4 - 5 hours 4 12.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 2.9 2.9 68.6 25.7 3.2 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 2.8 13.9 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 8.3 11.1 66.7 13.9 2.9 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 8.3 13.9 63.9 13.9 2.8 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 5.7 8.6 74.3 11.4 2.9 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 2.8 0.0 80.6 16.7 3.1 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 2.9 17.1 62.9 17.1 2.9 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 15.2 39.4 36.4 9.1 2.4 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 8.3 19.4 52.8 19.4 2.8 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 2.8 2.8 52.8 41.7 3.3 0.68 11. Was available for consultation 32 3.1 0.0 78.1 18.8 3.1 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 2.9 2.9 77.1 17.1 3.1 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 11.4 42.9 28.6 17.1 2.5 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 34 11.8 26.5 50.0 11.8 2.6 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 3.3 33.3 56.7 6.7 2.7 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 3.0 27.3 60.6 9.1 2.8 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 6.5 48.4 41.9 3.2 2.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 2.9 8.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 11.4 54.3 28.6 5.7 2.3 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 11.1 38.9 38.9 11.1 2.5 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 8.3 19.4 58.3 13.9 2.8 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 17 5.9 41.2 52.9 0.0 2.5 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 5.3 26.3 63.2 5.3 2.7 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 13.3 33.3 53.3 0.0 2.4 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 62.5 37.5 0.0 2.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 27.3 72.7 0.0 2.7 0.47 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 70 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 51.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 241 001L1 PHYSICAL LANDSCAPES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Phillips, Jonathan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 11.1 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 4 44.4 C 2 25.0 Senior 3 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 11.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 50.0 Required by my major 4 44.4 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 55.6 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 415 001L1 MAP INTERPRETATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Raitz, K B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 61.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 33.3 Junior 8 44.4 C 1 5.6 Senior 10 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 4 22.2 3 hours 2 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 14 77.8 4 - 5 hours 10 55.6 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 742 001L1 FUTURE FACULTY IN GEO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Roberts, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 75.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 50.0 3 hours 1 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 585 001L1 AGING AND ENVIRONMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rowles, Graham D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 6.7 Senior 6 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 46.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 13.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 20.0 Required by my major 7 46.7 3 hours 9 60.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 53.3 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 18.8 68.8 3.6 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 18.8 68.8 3.6 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GEO 409G401L1 GIS AND SCI:FUNDAMENTALS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rowles, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 45.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 54.5 Junior 3 27.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 27.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 27.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 9.1 I 0 0.0 Other 1 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 36.4 Required by my major 2 18.2 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 9 81.8 4 - 5 hours 3 27.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 30.8 61.5 7.7 2.8 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 15.4 61.5 15.4 2.8 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 7.7 0.0 76.9 15.4 3.0 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 53.8 38.5 0.0 2.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 16.7 33.3 41.7 8.3 2.4 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 15.4 23.1 61.5 0.0 2.5 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 23.1 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 15.4 23.1 53.8 7.7 2.5 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 38.5 53.8 0.0 2.5 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 23.1 76.9 0.0 2.8 0.44 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 23.1 69.2 0.0 2.6 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 15.4 15.4 69.2 0.0 2.5 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 30.8 61.5 0.0 2.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 15.4 30.8 53.8 0.0 2.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 711 001S1 CULTURAL STUDIES AND GEOGRAPHY: LANDSCAPES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Schein, Richard H. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 3 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 160 003L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Secor, Anna ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 25.7 A 13 37.1 Sophomore 11 31.4 B 18 51.4 Junior 10 28.6 C 3 8.6 Senior 4 11.4 D 1 2.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 2.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 45.7 Studies Program 30 88.2 2 hours 14 40.0 Required by my major 2 5.9 3 hours 4 11.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.9 4 - 5 hours 1 2.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 2.8 25.0 52.8 19.4 2.9 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 2.7 16.2 54.1 27.0 3.1 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 10.8 54.1 35.1 3.2 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 2.7 51.4 45.9 3.4 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 5.4 51.4 43.2 3.4 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 43.2 56.8 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 2.7 48.6 48.6 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 6.1 57.6 36.4 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 12.1 57.6 30.3 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 12.9 61.3 22.6 3.0 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 5.6 38.9 36.1 19.4 2.7 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 2.8 11.1 58.3 27.8 3.1 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 0.0 2.8 44.4 52.8 3.5 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 7.1 35.7 50.0 7.1 2.6 0.76 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 25 4.0 12.0 52.0 32.0 3.1 0.78 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 26 3.8 11.5 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.77 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 27 0.0 11.1 51.9 37.0 3.3 0.66 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 72 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 51.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 542 001L1 POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Secor, Anna ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 62.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 37.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 50.0 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 50.0 4 - 5 hours 4 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 61.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 326 001L1 GEOGRAPHY OF EUROPE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shannon, Gary W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.7 A 3 20.0 Sophomore 2 13.3 B 9 60.0 Junior 7 46.7 C 2 13.3 Senior 5 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 6.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 5 33.3 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 66.7 4 - 5 hours 2 13.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 40.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 2.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 6.7 66.7 20.0 3.0 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 6.7 0.0 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 0.0 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 6.7 0.0 66.7 26.7 3.1 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 6.7 0.0 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 6.7 0.0 20.0 73.3 3.6 0.83 11. Was available for consultation 12 8.3 0.0 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.83 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 0.0 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 13.3 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 6.7 0.0 66.7 26.7 3.1 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 6.7 20.0 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7 2.7 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 6.7 0.0 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 0.0 66.7 26.7 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 6.7 20.0 20.0 53.3 3.2 1.01 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 0.0 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 475G001L1 MEDICAL GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shannon, Gary W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 33.3 Senior 5 83.3 D 0