****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 630 001S1 SEM IN VALUE THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Breazeale, James D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 83.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 16.7 Pass or Audit 1 20.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 2 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 33.3 16.7 50.0 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 343 001L1 ASIAN PHILOSOPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bruzina, Ronald C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 6.8 A 19 44.2 Sophomore 14 31.8 B 18 41.9 Junior 12 27.3 C 3 7.0 Senior 15 34.1 D 1 2.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 4.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 13.6 Studies Program 20 47.6 2 hours 11 25.0 Required by my major 9 21.4 3 hours 12 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 13 31.0 4 - 5 hours 10 22.7 6 - 7 hours 3 6.8 8 or more hours 2 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 51 0.0 3.9 45.1 51.0 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 50 2.0 2.0 34.0 62.0 3.6 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 49 2.0 4.1 46.9 46.9 3.4 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 50 2.0 8.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 51 2.0 3.9 45.1 49.0 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 50 4.0 2.0 42.0 52.0 3.4 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 52 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 51 0.0 3.9 47.1 49.0 3.5 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 1.9 13.5 40.4 44.2 3.3 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 0.0 1.9 19.2 78.8 3.8 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 42 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 1.9 7.7 42.3 48.1 3.4 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 52 7.7 13.5 36.5 42.3 3.1 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 52 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 52 0.0 5.8 38.5 55.8 3.5 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 44 0.0 27.3 29.5 43.2 3.2 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 51 2.0 5.9 41.2 51.0 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 7.7 19.2 34.6 38.5 3.0 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 51 3.9 13.7 39.2 43.1 3.2 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 51 2.0 9.8 31.4 56.9 3.4 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 7.1 7.1 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 7.1 21.4 35.7 35.7 3.0 0.96 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 68 Number of forms scanned = 52 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 540 001L1 FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Callahan, Joan C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 1 16.7 B 0 0.0 Junior 3 50.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 100.0 4 - 5 hours 3 50.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 64.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 310 001L1 PHI OF HUMAN NATURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Force, James E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 23.5 Sophomore 1 5.6 B 9 52.9 Junior 10 55.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 4 23.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 9 50.0 Required by my major 2 11.1 3 hours 3 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 15 83.3 4 - 5 hours 3 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 3.7 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 3.7 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 15.8 73.7 3.6 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 15.0 45.0 40.0 3.3 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 10.5 15.8 73.7 3.6 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 21.1 73.7 3.7 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 64.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 008L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Frank, Daniel ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 80.8 A 8 30.8 Sophomore 3 11.5 B 18 69.2 Junior 2 7.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 65.4 Studies Program 18 69.2 2 hours 6 23.1 Required by my major 2 7.7 3 hours 2 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 23.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 73.1 26.9 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 3.8 73.1 23.1 3.2 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 65.4 30.8 3.3 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 23.1 42.3 34.6 3.1 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 72.0 28.0 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 76.0 24.0 3.2 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 8.0 8.0 60.0 24.0 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 11.5 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 30.8 46.2 19.2 2.8 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 21.7 56.5 21.7 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 69.2 26.9 3.2 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 8.0 36.0 44.0 12.0 2.6 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 700 001S1 SEM IN ANCIENT PHI INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Frank, Daniel ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 16.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 85.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 16.7 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 16.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 7 100.0 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 520 001L1 SYMBOLIC LOGIC II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldberg, Sanford ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 66.7 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 60.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 14.3 42.9 14.3 28.6 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 575 001L1 PHILOSOPHY OF MIND INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldberg, Sanford ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 18.2 Sophomore 1 9.1 B 5 45.5 Junior 4 36.4 C 1 9.1 Senior 3 27.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 9.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 18.2 Pass or Audit 3 27.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 36.4 3 hours 6 54.5 Other (e.g. elective) 7 63.6 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 68.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 005L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hale, Frank B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 81.3 A 3 18.8 Sophomore 2 12.5 B 5 31.3 Junior 1 6.3 C 6 37.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 6.3 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 6.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 12 80.0 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 20.0 4 - 5 hours 4 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 6.7 53.3 33.3 3.1 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 23.5 47.1 29.4 3.1 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 17.6 23.5 41.2 17.6 2.6 1.00 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 11.8 35.3 41.2 11.8 2.5 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 17.6 29.4 41.2 3.0 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 2.8 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 18.8 25.0 31.3 25.0 2.6 1.09 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 35.3 29.4 29.4 2.8 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 29.4 17.6 52.9 3.2 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 71.4 28.6 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 58.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 006L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hale, Frank B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 45.5 A 5 45.5 Sophomore 2 18.2 B 4 36.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 18.2 Senior 2 18.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 9.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 6 54.5 2 hours 4 36.4 Required by my major 2 18.2 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 3 27.3 4 - 5 hours 2 18.2 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 0.0 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 26.7 26.7 40.0 3.0 1.00 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 20.0 26.7 46.7 3.1 0.99 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 26.7 53.3 13.3 2.7 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 57.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 305 002L1 HEALTH CARE ETHICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hale, Frank B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 12.5 Sophomore 11 45.8 B 16 66.7 Junior 8 33.3 C 3 12.5 Senior 5 20.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 8.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 41.7 Studies Program 5 22.7 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 7 31.8 3 hours 5 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 10 45.5 4 - 5 hours 4 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 82.6 17.4 3.2 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 4.3 13.0 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 8.7 73.9 13.0 3.0 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 4.2 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 13.0 21.7 56.5 8.7 2.6 0.84 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 16.7 62.5 20.8 3.0 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 12.5 70.8 12.5 2.9 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 20.8 58.3 20.8 3.0 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 4.2 4.2 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 4.2 8.3 70.8 16.7 3.0 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 12.5 58.3 29.2 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 17.4 56.5 26.1 3.1 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 45.8 33.3 16.7 2.6 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 12.5 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 305 003L1 HEALTH CARE ETHICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hale, Frank B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 50.0 Sophomore 1 5.6 B 3 16.7 Junior 9 50.0 C 5 27.8 Senior 8 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 33.3 Studies Program 6 33.3 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 5 27.8 3 hours 3 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 7 38.9 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 2 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 13.6 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 4.5 4.5 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 13.6 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 9.1 18.2 40.9 31.8 3.0 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 4.5 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 9.1 13.6 45.5 31.8 3.0 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 19.0 47.6 33.3 3.1 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 9.5 9.5 38.1 42.9 3.1 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 73.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 350 001L1 DEATH/DYING/QUAL OF LIFE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leaman, Oliver ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 3.6 A 13 46.4 Sophomore 2 7.1 B 12 42.9 Junior 5 17.9 C 2 7.1 Senior 19 67.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 53.6 Studies Program 18 64.3 2 hours 7 25.0 Required by my major 1 3.6 3 hours 4 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 9 32.1 4 - 5 hours 2 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 16.7 16.7 43.3 23.3 2.7 1.01 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 10.0 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 13.3 70.0 16.7 3.0 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 17.2 41.4 41.4 3.2 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 17.9 60.7 21.4 3.0 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 26.9 53.8 19.2 2.9 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 13.8 51.7 34.5 3.2 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 13.8 51.7 34.5 3.2 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 10.7 32.1 57.1 3.5 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 104 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 28.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 509 001L1 TOPS IN HIS MODERN PHI INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Look, Brandon C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 1 11.1 B 2 20.0 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 22.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 55.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 3 37.5 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 62.5 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 61.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 680 001S1 SPEC TOPS IN PHILOSOPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Manns, James W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 33.3 3 hours 1 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 66.7 4 - 5 hours 2 66.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 320 001L1 SYMBOLIC LOGIC I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Monton, Bradley ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.2 A 13 54.2 Sophomore 6 25.0 B 7 29.2 Junior 12 50.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 20.8 D 3 12.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 45.8 Studies Program 13 59.1 2 hours 8 33.3 Required by my major 4 18.2 3 hours 2 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 22.7 4 - 5 hours 2 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 16.0 40.0 44.0 3.3 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 3.8 23.1 42.3 30.8 3.0 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 70.8 29.2 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 64.0 36.0 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 25.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 11.5 61.5 26.9 3.2 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 3.8 65.4 30.8 3.3 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 64.0 36.0 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 11.5 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 28.0 44.0 24.0 2.9 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 15.0 80.0 5.0 2.9 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 3.8 69.2 26.9 3.2 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 15.4 65.4 19.2 3.0 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 16.0 36.0 36.0 12.0 2.4 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 30.8 38.5 26.9 2.9 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 23.1 42.3 34.6 3.1 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 69 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 37.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 007L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perreiah, Alan R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 50.0 A 9 34.6 Sophomore 12 46.2 B 11 42.3 Junior 1 3.8 C 5 19.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 3.8 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 23.1 Studies Program 22 84.6 2 hours 10 38.5 Required by my major 2 7.7 3 hours 7 26.9 Other (e.g. elective) 2 7.7 4 - 5 hours 3 11.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 3.4 51.7 44.8 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 6.9 20.7 44.8 27.6 2.9 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 3.6 14.3 50.0 32.1 3.1 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 3.4 51.7 44.8 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 17.2 41.4 41.4 3.2 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 57.1 39.3 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 10.3 37.9 48.3 3.3 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 3.4 10.3 41.4 44.8 3.3 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 3.6 3.6 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 6.9 10.3 37.9 44.8 3.2 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 3.4 37.9 55.2 3.4 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 51.7 41.4 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 3.4 0.0 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 3.4 3.4 48.3 44.8 3.3 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 3.6 0.0 53.6 42.9 3.4 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 13.8 24.1 34.5 27.6 2.8 1.02 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 24.1 41.4 34.5 3.1 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 10.3 31.0 55.2 3.4 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 93.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 260 001L1 HIS PHI I:GRK BEGINNINGS TO THE MIDDLE AGES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perreiah, Alan R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 23.1 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 4 33.3 Junior 1 7.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 38.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 23.1 Studies Program 5 38.5 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 4 30.8 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 4 30.8 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 2 15.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 0.0 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 0.0 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 7.1 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 0.0 28.6 64.3 3.5 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 0.0 7.1 85.7 3.7 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 58.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER