****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 430G001L1 CONDUCT AMER FOREIGN REL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 54.5 Sophomore 2 18.2 B 5 45.5 Junior 3 27.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 54.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 7 63.6 3 hours 5 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 36.4 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 0.0 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.84 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 14 7.1 0.0 14.3 78.6 3.6 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 7.1 85.7 3.8 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 30.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 439G002L1 CONTEMP INTERNATL PROBS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 77.8 Sophomore 1 11.1 B 1 11.1 Junior 5 55.6 C 1 11.1 Senior 3 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 6 75.0 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 25.0 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 40.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 461G001L1 CIVIL LIBERTIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Canon, Bradley C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 34.8 Sophomore 11 47.8 B 12 52.2 Junior 6 26.1 C 2 8.7 Senior 5 21.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.3 Pass or Audit 1 4.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 22.7 Studies Program 4 18.2 2 hours 5 22.7 Required by my major 12 54.5 3 hours 10 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 6 27.3 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 12.0 44.0 44.0 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 12.0 48.0 40.0 3.3 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 16.0 40.0 44.0 3.3 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 12.0 52.0 36.0 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 25 4.0 0.0 44.0 52.0 3.4 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 16.0 48.0 36.0 3.2 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 8.7 43.5 47.8 3.4 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 8.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 20.0 44.0 36.0 3.2 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 53.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 271 001L1 INTRO POLITICAL BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 12.5 A 9 37.5 Sophomore 9 37.5 B 11 45.8 Junior 8 33.3 C 3 12.5 Senior 3 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.2 Pass or Audit 1 4.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 41.7 Studies Program 3 12.5 2 hours 6 25.0 Required by my major 8 33.3 3 hours 6 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 13 54.2 4 - 5 hours 2 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 16.0 52.0 32.0 3.2 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 12.0 24.0 52.0 12.0 2.6 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 13.6 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 12.5 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 16.7 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 4.0 64.0 32.0 3.3 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 17.4 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 12.0 24.0 36.0 28.0 2.8 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 13.0 30.4 39.1 17.4 2.6 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 12.0 60.0 28.0 3.2 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 16.0 60.0 24.0 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 20.8 66.7 12.5 2.9 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 52.2 34.8 13.0 2.6 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 4.0 4.0 68.0 24.0 3.1 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 20.0 32.0 28.0 20.0 2.5 1.05 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 33.3 45.8 16.7 2.8 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 43.5 13.0 43.5 3.0 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 78.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 491 001L1 SP TOP IN PS: MEXICIAN POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 4 33.3 C 1 10.0 Senior 6 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 16.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 36.4 Required by my major 10 83.3 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 16.7 4 - 5 hours 2 18.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 0.0 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 88.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 491 003L1 SP TOP IN PS: DECOM. & INT'L AFFAIRS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Desch, Michael ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 28.6 Junior 1 6.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 18.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 75.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 46.7 3 hours 6 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 53.3 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 5 33.3 8 or more hours 1 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 5.9 0.0 58.8 35.3 3.2 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 11.1 0.0 22.2 66.7 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 280 001L1 ISSUES IN PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fording, Richard C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 25.0 A 2 25.0 Sophomore 3 37.5 B 5 62.5 Junior 1 12.5 C 1 12.5 Senior 2 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 6 75.0 3 hours 4 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 25.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 12.5 12.5 25.0 50.0 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 37.5 25.0 37.5 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 489G001L1 ANALYSIS PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fording, Richard C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 61.1 Junior 9 47.4 C 1 5.6 Senior 10 52.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.5 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 15 78.9 3 hours 10 52.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 55.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 210 001L1 INTRO EURO POL:EAST/WEST INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gabel, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 12.5 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 6 37.5 B 4 25.0 Junior 3 18.8 C 5 31.3 Senior 4 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 43.8 Required by my major 11 68.8 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 31.3 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 5.9 29.4 35.3 29.4 2.9 0.93 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 5.9 11.8 41.2 41.2 3.2 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 17.6 35.3 47.1 3.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 60.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 439G001L1 CONTEMP INTERNATL PROBS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gabel, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 22.2 Sophomore 3 16.7 B 11 61.1 Junior 6 33.3 C 2 11.1 Senior 9 50.0 D 1 5.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 14 77.8 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 22.2 4 - 5 hours 3 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 10.5 78.9 10.5 3.0 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 15.8 68.4 15.8 3.0 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 10.5 78.9 10.5 3.0 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 15.8 52.6 26.3 3.0 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 26.3 52.6 21.1 2.9 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 27.8 33.3 38.9 3.1 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 51.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 101 006L1 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gross, Donald A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 43.3 A 11 36.7 Sophomore 7 23.3 B 17 56.7 Junior 5 16.7 C 1 3.3 Senior 5 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 56.7 Studies Program 21 70.0 2 hours 5 16.7 Required by my major 6 20.0 3 hours 8 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 10.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 61.3 35.5 3.3 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 9.7 12.9 58.1 19.4 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 6.7 26.7 56.7 10.0 2.7 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 3.3 10.0 70.0 16.7 3.0 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 3.4 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 3.4 0.0 69.0 27.6 3.2 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 18.2 31.8 40.9 9.1 2.4 0.91 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 6.7 13.3 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 3.2 35.5 61.3 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 4.0 64.0 32.0 3.3 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 3.3 16.7 63.3 16.7 2.9 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 16.1 67.7 16.1 3.0 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 3.6 14.3 78.6 3.6 2.8 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 3.8 23.1 65.4 7.7 2.8 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 43.5 47.8 4.3 2.5 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 3.4 82.8 13.8 3.1 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 3.6 39.3 46.4 10.7 2.6 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 3.2 16.1 61.3 19.4 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 6.5 9.7 61.3 22.6 3.0 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 26.7 66.7 6.7 2.8 0.56 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 75 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 41.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 476G001L1 LEGISLATIVE PROCESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gross, Donald A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 25.9 Sophomore 3 10.3 B 11 40.7 Junior 15 51.7 C 7 25.9 Senior 11 37.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 7.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 28.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 35.7 Required by my major 20 71.4 3 hours 6 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 8 28.6 4 - 5 hours 4 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 71.0 25.8 3.2 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 9.4 15.6 59.4 15.6 2.8 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 10.0 76.7 10.0 2.9 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 3.1 68.8 28.1 3.3 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 3.3 6.7 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 7.7 38.5 38.5 15.4 2.6 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 6.3 28.1 43.8 21.9 2.8 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 3.1 34.4 62.5 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 69.0 31.0 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 6.3 59.4 34.4 3.3 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 6.3 21.9 46.9 25.0 2.9 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 32 6.3 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 14.8 74.1 11.1 3.0 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 16.7 63.3 20.0 3.0 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 19.2 65.4 15.4 3.0 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 6.5 67.7 25.8 3.2 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 3.2 29.0 51.6 16.1 2.8 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 15.6 56.3 28.1 3.1 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 21.9 50.0 28.1 3.1 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 68.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 685 401S1 PROSEM PUB ADMIN & POLIC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hager, Gregory L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 60.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 39.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 26 92.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.6 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 22.2 Studies Program 2 7.1 2 hours 5 18.5 Required by my major 18 64.3 3 hours 9 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 28.6 4 - 5 hours 5 18.5 6 - 7 hours 2 7.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 3.4 17.2 79.3 3.8 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 0.0 65.5 34.5 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 3.4 65.5 31.0 3.3 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.9 0.31 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 6.9 41.4 51.7 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 6.9 31.0 62.1 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 20.7 79.3 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 3.4 34.5 62.1 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 0.0 14.3 46.4 39.3 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 11.5 53.8 34.6 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 4.0 8.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 33.3 40.7 25.9 2.9 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 10.3 34.5 55.2 3.4 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 6.9 20.7 72.4 3.7 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 78.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 491 002L1 SP TOP IN PS: ETHNIC CONFLICT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kaufman, Stuart ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 12.5 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 100.0 Junior 3 37.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 12.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 62.5 3 hours 4 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 37.5 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 11.1 0.0 66.7 22.2 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 711 002S1 TOP SEM IN PS: ETHNIC CONFLICT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kaufman, Stuart ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 85.7 4 - 5 hours 4 57.1 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 101 001L1 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Pennie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 20 43.5 A 15 32.6 Sophomore 11 23.9 B 25 54.3 Junior 10 21.7 C 6 13.0 Senior 5 10.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 21.7 Studies Program 27 62.8 2 hours 16 34.8 Required by my major 9 20.9 3 hours 12 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 7 16.3 4 - 5 hours 7 15.2 6 - 7 hours 1 2.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 46 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 4.3 2.2 47.8 45.7 3.3 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 46 4.3 10.9 39.1 45.7 3.3 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 46 4.3 4.3 50.0 41.3 3.3 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 46 0.0 2.2 41.3 56.5 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 46 0.0 0.0 41.3 58.7 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 45 0.0 2.2 31.1 66.7 3.6 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 46 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 46 0.0 8.7 45.7 45.7 3.4 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 46 0.0 2.2 26.1 71.7 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 42 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 46 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 46 0.0 15.2 32.6 52.2 3.4 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 46 0.0 2.2 45.7 52.2 3.5 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 45 2.2 8.9 51.1 37.8 3.2 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 44 2.3 9.1 47.7 40.9 3.3 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 2.9 23.5 44.1 29.4 3.0 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 4.4 17.8 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 46 0.0 10.9 37.0 52.2 3.4 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 45 0.0 6.7 35.6 57.8 3.5 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 36 0.0 13.9 52.8 33.3 3.2 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 36 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 73 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 46 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 235 002L1 WORLD POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mingst, Karen A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 30.0 A 3 15.0 Sophomore 3 15.0 B 9 45.0 Junior 5 25.0 C 8 40.0 Senior 4 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 10.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 25.0 Studies Program 6 30.0 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 8 40.0 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 30.0 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 4.8 19.0 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.84 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 4.8 0.0 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 9.5 14.3 57.1 19.0 2.9 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 14.3 9.5 52.4 23.8 2.9 0.96 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 14.3 9.5 52.4 23.8 2.9 0.96 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 10.0 55.0 30.0 3.1 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 19.0 23.8 52.4 3.2 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 5.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 21 4.8 4.8 23.8 66.7 3.5 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 20.0 65.0 15.0 3.0 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 9.5 19.0 33.3 38.1 3.0 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 14.3 52.4 33.3 3.2 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 58.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 436G001L1 INTERNATNL ORGANIZATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mingst, Karen A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 30.8 Sophomore 2 7.4 B 13 50.0 Junior 5 18.5 C 3 11.5 Senior 12 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 29.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 7.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 38.5 Required by my major 12 46.2 3 hours 7 26.9 Other (e.g. elective) 14 53.8 4 - 5 hours 4 15.4 6 - 7 hours 2 7.7 8 or more hours 2 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 12.0 48.0 40.0 3.3 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 19.2 50.0 30.8 3.1 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 3.8 3.8 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 16.7 54.2 29.2 3.1 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 3.8 11.5 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 15.4 57.7 26.9 3.1 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 11.5 53.8 34.6 3.2 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 15.4 38.5 42.3 3.2 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 12.5 58.3 29.2 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 17.4 47.8 34.8 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 23.8 38.1 38.1 3.1 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 12.0 52.0 36.0 3.2 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material