****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 302 001L1 SOCIO RESEARCH METHS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Joanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 37.5 Sophomore 2 11.8 B 9 56.3 Junior 2 11.8 C 1 6.3 Senior 13 76.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 9 56.3 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 7 43.8 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 2 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 9.5 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 5.3 21.1 31.6 42.1 3.1 0.94 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 9.5 33.3 57.1 3.5 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 4.8 9.5 33.3 52.4 3.3 0.86 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 0.0 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 9.5 23.8 61.9 3.4 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 0.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 67.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 002L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Joanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 25.0 Sophomore 1 5.0 B 11 55.0 Junior 4 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 75.0 D 1 5.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 15.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 45.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 8 40.0 Required by my major 6 30.0 3 hours 3 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 13 65.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 19.0 61.9 19.0 3.0 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 20.0 35.0 30.0 15.0 2.4 0.99 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 19.0 38.1 23.8 19.0 2.4 1.03 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 33.3 52.4 14.3 2.8 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 28.6 52.4 14.3 2.8 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 23.8 61.9 14.3 2.9 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 9.5 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 33.3 47.6 19.0 2.9 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 33.3 52.4 14.3 2.8 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 46.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 001L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dyk, P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 6 66.7 C 1 11.1 Senior 3 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 2 22.2 3 hours 6 66.7 Other (e.g. elective) 7 77.8 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 35.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 342 002L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Egan, ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 58.6 Sophomore 1 3.4 B 7 24.1 Junior 15 51.7 C 2 6.9 Senior 13 44.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 10.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 34.5 Studies Program 10 34.5 2 hours 11 37.9 Required by my major 9 31.0 3 hours 4 13.8 Other (e.g. elective) 10 34.5 4 - 5 hours 4 13.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 61.3 35.5 3.3 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 12.9 38.7 48.4 3.4 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 19.2 53.8 26.9 3.1 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 67.7 32.3 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 0.0 64.5 35.5 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 3.4 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 9.7 32.3 35.5 22.6 2.7 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 6.5 41.9 51.6 3.5 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 24 8.3 16.7 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.88 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 6.5 48.4 45.2 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 9.7 19.4 41.9 29.0 2.9 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 3.2 32.3 64.5 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 6.5 0.0 45.2 48.4 3.4 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 6.7 3.3 53.3 36.7 3.2 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 7.1 32.1 32.1 28.6 2.8 0.94 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 9.7 3.2 51.6 35.5 3.1 0.88 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 12.9 38.7 22.6 25.8 2.6 1.02 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 9.7 19.4 38.7 32.3 2.9 0.96 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 9.7 16.1 38.7 35.5 3.0 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 54.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 260 001L1 POPULAT, RESOURC & CHNGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garkovich, Lorraine E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 8.8 A 20 60.6 Sophomore 12 35.3 B 13 39.4 Junior 12 35.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 20.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 44.1 Studies Program 13 38.2 2 hours 11 32.4 Required by my major 16 47.1 3 hours 5 14.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 14.7 4 - 5 hours 3 8.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 19.4 29.0 38.7 12.9 2.5 0.96 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 17.1 45.7 34.3 3.1 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 5.7 48.6 45.7 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 2.9 0.0 51.4 45.7 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 5.7 68.6 25.7 3.2 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 5.7 54.3 40.0 3.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 2.9 5.7 51.4 40.0 3.3 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 5.7 17.1 31.4 45.7 3.2 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 2.9 57.1 40.0 3.4 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 5.7 51.4 42.9 3.4 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 2.9 8.6 34.3 54.3 3.4 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 2.9 8.6 48.6 40.0 3.3 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 8.6 48.6 42.9 3.3 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 2.9 26.5 38.2 32.4 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 5.7 14.3 40.0 40.0 3.1 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 8.6 40.0 51.4 3.4 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 72.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 350 002L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: SOC POLICY IN HLTH CARE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gran, Brian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 81.0 Sophomore 2 9.1 B 3 14.3 Junior 10 45.5 C 1 4.8 Senior 9 40.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 47.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 23.8 Required by my major 7 33.3 3 hours 5 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 14 66.7 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 20.0 40.0 35.0 3.1 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 0.0 9.1 86.4 3.8 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 4.8 33.3 57.1 3.4 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 59.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 439 001L1 SP TOP CRIME & DELIN: SOCIOLOGY OF LAW INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gran, Brian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 68.0 Sophomore 1 4.0 B 4 16.0 Junior 4 16.0 C 2 8.0 Senior 20 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 8.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 24.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 32.0 Required by my major 11 44.0 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 14 56.0 4 - 5 hours 3 12.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 16.7 54.2 20.8 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 4.0 4.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 4.0 32.0 64.0 3.6 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 51.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 45.9 Junior 8 21.6 C 1 2.7 Senior 28 75.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 18.9 Studies Program 14 37.8 2 hours 14 37.8 Required by my major 15 40.5 3 hours 15 40.5 Other (e.g. elective) 8 21.6 4 - 5 hours 1 2.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 0.0 5.3 60.5 34.2 3.3 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 0.0 0.0 60.5 39.5 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 5.3 55.3 39.5 3.3 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 0.0 7.9 60.5 31.6 3.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 0.0 0.0 65.8 34.2 3.3 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 2.9 47.1 50.0 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 13.5 56.8 29.7 3.2 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 38 0.0 0.0 60.5 39.5 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 2.8 66.7 30.6 3.3 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 8.3 61.1 30.6 3.2 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 5.6 25.0 47.2 22.2 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 10.8 51.4 37.8 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 2.7 45.9 51.4 3.5 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 26 3.8 3.8 57.7 34.6 3.2 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 66 Number of forms scanned = 66 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 57.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 610 401L1 PROSEMINAR COMPLEX ORGS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 91.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 8.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 16.7 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 10 83.3 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 3 25.0 8 or more hours 4 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.83 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 680 001L1 METHS SOCIAL INVESTIGATN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 50.0 16.7 33.3 2.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 442G001L1 SOCIOLOGY OF WORK AND OCCUPATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 54.1 Sophomore 1 2.7 B 11 29.7 Junior 14 37.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 21 56.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 6 16.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 22 59.5 Studies Program 2 5.4 2 hours 10 27.0 Required by my major 8 21.6 3 hours 4 10.8 Other (e.g. elective) 27 73.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 2.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 7.3 75.6 17.1 3.1 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 7.5 45.0 40.0 7.5 2.5 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 22.0 61.0 17.1 3.0 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 0.0 4.9 68.3 26.8 3.2 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 7.3 78.0 14.6 3.1 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 2.4 73.2 24.4 3.2 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 40 2.5 15.0 65.0 17.5 3.0 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 0.0 5.1 66.7 28.2 3.2 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 4.9 41.5 41.5 12.2 2.6 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 2.4 51.2 46.3 3.4 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 39 0.0 2.6 71.8 25.6 3.2 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 2.4 78.0 19.5 3.2 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 12.2 29.3 46.3 12.2 2.6 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 41 2.4 14.6 63.4 19.5 3.0 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 20.0 65.7 14.3 2.9 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 22.2 63.9 13.9 2.9 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 31.4 48.6 20.0 2.9 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 15.8 65.8 18.4 3.0 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 2.6 42.1 47.4 7.9 2.6 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 2.7 51.4 32.4 13.5 2.6 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 8.1 37.8 37.8 16.2 2.6 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 80.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 451G401L1 FOUNDATIONS SOC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leedham, Cynthia A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 21.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 40.6 Junior 10 29.4 C 12 37.5 Senior 21 61.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 5.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 8.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 38.2 Required by my major 24 70.6 3 hours 10 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 10 29.4 4 - 5 hours 5 14.7 6 - 7 hours 3 8.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 2.9 5.7 37.1 54.3 3.4 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 8.6 20.0 45.7 25.7 2.9 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 2.9 17.6 50.0 29.4 3.1 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 5.7 11.4 54.3 28.6 3.1 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 11.4 17.1 54.3 17.1 2.8 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 2.9 5.7 71.4 20.0 3.1 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 2.9 14.7 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 5.9 5.9 38.2 50.0 3.3 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 14.3 14.3 48.6 22.9 2.8 0.96 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 2.9 2.9 32.4 61.8 3.5 0.71 11. Was available for consultation 31 3.2 6.5 48.4 41.9 3.3 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 2.9 2.9 65.7 28.6 3.2 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 20.6 32.4 29.4 17.6 2.4 1.02 14. Encouraged class participation 34 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 8.8 17.6 50.0 23.5 2.9 0.88 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 5.9 17.6 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 9.1 33.3 42.4 15.2 2.6 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 8.8 20.6 41.2 29.4 2.9 0.93 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 15.2 33.3 33.3 18.2 2.5 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 17.1 25.7 42.9 14.3 2.5 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 11.4 25.7 31.4 31.4 2.8 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 70.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 636 001L1 STRATIFICATION AND MOBILITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = McKeever, Matt ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 20.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 2.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 20.0 20.0 0.0 60.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 60.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 2.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 40.0 20.0 0.0 40.0 2.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 40.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 2.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 20.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 2.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 682 001L1 SP TOP IN ADV SOC METH: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = McKeever, Matt ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 83.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 16.7 Pass or Audit 1 16.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 16.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 66.7 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 33.3 16.7 50.0 3.2 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 452G001L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mooney, Patrick H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 32.1 Junior 4 14.3 C 10 35.7 Senior 23 82.1 D 2 7.1 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 21.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 21.4 Required by my major 27 96.4 3 hours 10 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.6 4 - 5 hours 4 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 6.7 0.0 56.7 36.7 3.2 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 16.7 63.3 16.7 2.9 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 3.3 40.0 33.3 23.3 2.8 0.86 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 3.3 16.7 56.7 23.3 3.0 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 3.3 3.3 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 3.3 3.3 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 3.6 42.9 50.0 3.6 2.5 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 23.3 30.0 26.7 20.0 2.4 1.07 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 24 4.2 4.2 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 10.0 6.7 60.0 23.3 3.0 0.85 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 25.0 21.4 21.4 32.1 2.6 1.20 14. Encouraged class participation 30 6.7 6.7 50.0 36.7 3.2 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 8.0 12.0 56.0 24.0 3.0 0.84 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 7.1 17.9 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.86 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 8.7 26.1 47.8 17.4 2.7 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 6.9 20.7 27.6 44.8 3.1 0.98 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 21.4 21.4 39.3 17.9 2.5 1.04 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 16.7 30.0 26.7 26.7 2.6 1.07 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 16.7 23.3 30.0 30.0 2.7 1.08. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 73.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 751 001S1 SEMINAR IN SOC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mooney, Patrick H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 60.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 001L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Niroula, Nirmal ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 31 73.8 A 21 50.0 Sophomore 6 14.3 B 18 42.9 Junior 1 2.4 C 2 4.8 Senior 4 9.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 50.0 Studies Program 35 85.4 2 hours 13 31.0 Required by my major 3 7.3 3 hours 5 11.9 Other (e.g. elective) 3 7.3 4 - 5 hours 3 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 4.5 47.7 47.7 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 43 0.0 2.3 65.1 32.6 3.3 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 0.0 14.0 62.8 23.3 3.1 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 0.0 16.7 57.1 26.2 3.1 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 2.4 57.1 40.5 3.4 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 4.8 21.4 40.5 33.3 3.0 0.87 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 6.5 29.0 45.2 19.4 2.8 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 2.3 7.0 44.2 46.5 3.3 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 43 0.0 4.7 32.6 62.8 3.6 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 39 2.6 10.3 48.7 38.5 3.2 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 2.3 55.8 41.9 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 2.3 11.6 46.5 39.5 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 43 0.0 0.0 53.5 46.5 3.5 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 43 0.0 2.3 55.8 41.9 3.4 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 43 2.3 23.3 41.9 32.6 3.0 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 2.7 18.9 54.1 24.3 3.0 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 0.0 4.7 58.1 37.2 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 2.4 28.6 40.5 28.6 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 2.3 7.0 60.5 30.2 3.2 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 43 2.3 2.3 41.9 53.5 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 5.6 0.0 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 5.3 0.0 84.2 10.5 3.0 0.58 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 76 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 57.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 437 001L1 CRIMINOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Niroula, Nirmal ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 35.6 Sophomore 2 3.4 B 24 40.7 Junior 13 22.4 C 4 6.8 Senior 43 74.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 10 16.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 33 55.9 Studies Program 1 1.7 2 hours 17 28.8 Required by my major 6 10.2 3 hours 7 11.9 Other (e.g. elective) 52 88.1 4 - 5 hours 2 3.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 60 0.0 1.7 71.7 26.7 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 60 0.0 5.0 53.3 41.7 3.4 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 59 0.0 18.6 55.9 25.4 3.1 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 60 3.3 10.0 63.3 23.3 3.1 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 60 0.0 1.7 71.7 26.7 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 60 3.3 11.7 61.7 23.3 3.1 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 59 0.0 1.7 64.4 33.9 3.3 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 54 3.7 33.3 38.9 24.1 2.8 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 60 10.0 23.3 48.3 18.3 2.8 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 60 0.0 3.3 65.0 31.7 3.3 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 46 2.2 2.2 63.0 32.6 3.3 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 59 1.7 11.9 67.8 18.6 3.0 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 60 8.3 25.0 43.3 23.3 2.8 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 59 1.7 1.7 67.8 28.8 3.2 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 57 3.5 8.8 64.9 22.8 3.1 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 57 5.3 8.8 63.2 22.8 3.0 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 56 5.4 17.9 53.6 23.2 2.9 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 60 5.0 1.7 70.0 23.3 3.1 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 60 6.7 23.3 43.3 26.7 2.9 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 58 0.0 13.8 65.5 20.7 3.1 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 58 5.2 27.6 48.3 19.0 2.8 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 106 Number of forms scanned = 63 Number of forms with at least one student response = 60 Percent completed = 56.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 303 001L1 SOCIO RESEARCH METHS II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ousey, Graham ---------------------------------------------------