1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 004L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 42.9 Sophomore 1 16.7 B 4 57.1 Junior 4 66.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 71.4 2 hours 3 42.9 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 33.3 0.0 50.0 16.7 2.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 33.3 16.7 50.0 0.0 2.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 004L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 28.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 005L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 13.3 Sophomore 5 31.3 B 12 80.0 Junior 5 31.3 C 1 6.7 Senior 6 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.3 Studies Program 15 93.8 2 hours 10 62.5 Required by my major 1 6.3 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 23.5 64.7 5.9 2.7 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 23.5 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 5.9 17.6 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 11.8 82.4 5.9 2.9 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 17.6 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 93.8 6.3 3.1 0.25 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 30.8 53.8 7.7 2.6 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 5.9 17.6 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 23.5 23.5 41.2 11.8 2.4 1.00 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 31.3 56.3 12.5 2.8 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 11.8 5.9 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.86 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 29.4 58.8 11.8 2.8 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 12.5 37.5 43.8 6.3 2.4 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 23.5 64.7 11.8 2.9 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 23.5 23.5 41.2 11.8 2.4 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 17.6 35.3 35.3 11.8 2.4 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 17.6 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.73 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 005L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 0.0 87.5 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 10.0 0.0 90.0 0.0 2.8 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 10.0 10.0 80.0 0.0 2.7 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 10.0 20.0 40.0 30.0 2.9 0.99 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 18.2 9.1 63.6 9.1 2.6 0.92 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 70.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 006L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 19.0 Sophomore 3 14.3 B 14 66.7 Junior 7 33.3 C 3 14.3 Senior 11 52.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 28.6 Studies Program 19 95.0 2 hours 10 47.6 Required by my major 1 5.0 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 19.0 61.9 14.3 2.9 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 15.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 4.8 19.0 66.7 9.5 2.8 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 4.8 81.0 14.3 3.1 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 5.0 10.0 75.0 10.0 2.9 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 4.8 85.7 9.5 3.0 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 56.3 31.3 6.3 2.4 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 14.3 81.0 4.8 2.9 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 61.9 33.3 0.0 2.3 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 27.8 72.2 0.0 2.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 2.7 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 40.0 53.3 6.7 2.7 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 9.5 57.1 33.3 0.0 2.2 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 20.0 35.0 45.0 0.0 2.3 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 4.8 19.0 71.4 4.8 2.8 0.62 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 006L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 2.8 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 35.7 64.3 0.0 2.6 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 11.1 0.0 88.9 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 007L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 28.6 Sophomore 2 14.3 B 9 64.3 Junior 8 57.1 C 1 7.1 Senior 4 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 14.3 Studies Program 11 78.6 2 hours 6 42.9 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 14.3 4 - 5 hours 3 21.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 7.7 0.0 69.2 23.1 3.1 0.76 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 7.1 57.1 28.6 7.1 2.4 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 8.3 33.3 50.0 8.3 2.6 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 7.1 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 50.0 21.4 14.3 2.4 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 14 7.1 42.9 42.9 7.1 2.5 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 46.2 38.5 15.4 2.7 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 63.6 36.4 0.0 2.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 28.6 35.7 35.7 0.0 2.1 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 21.4 35.7 42.9 0.0 2.2 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 28.6 64.3 0.0 2.6 0.65 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 007L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 11.1 33.3 44.4 11.1 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 37.5 25.0 25.0 12.5 2.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 63.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 008L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 70.6 Sophomore 4 22.2 B 5 29.4 Junior 11 61.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 17.6 Studies Program 15 88.2 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 2 11.8 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 21.1 68.4 10.5 2.9 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 10.5 78.9 10.5 3.0 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 84.2 10.5 3.1 0.40 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 3.0 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 10.5 31.6 52.6 5.3 2.5 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 22.2 66.7 5.6 2.7 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 5.6 77.8 11.1 2.9 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 15.4 30.8 53.8 0.0 2.4 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 16.7 44.4 33.3 5.6 2.3 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 26.3 63.2 10.5 2.8 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 008L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 0.39 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 82.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 526 001L1 PSYCHOLOGIC ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 1 9.1 B 4 40.0 Junior 4 36.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 27.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 9.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 18.2 Pass or Audit 1 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 80.0 4 - 5 hours 4 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 20.0 10.0 40.0 30.0 2.8 1.14 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 526 001L1 PSYCHOLOGIC ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 661 001L1 ETHNOGRAPHIC DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 11.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 3 33.3 8 or more hours 3 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 33.3 22.2 44.4 3.1 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 11.1 33.3 55.6 0.0 2.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 11.1 22.2 33.3 33.3 2.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 661 001L1 ETHNOGRAPHIC DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 523 001L1 HUMAN VARIATION IN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 3 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 11.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 6 75.0 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 22.2 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 523 001L1 HUMAN VARIATION IN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 555 401L1 EAST N AMER ARCHAEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 16.7 Senior 2 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 66.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 3 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 555 401L1 EAST N AMER ARCHAEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 602 001S1 INTRODUCTORY SEMINAR IN CULTURE DYNAMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 10 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 50.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 3 30.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 602 001S1 INTRODUCTORY SEMINAR IN CULTURE DYNAMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 20.0 30.0 50.0 3.3 0.82 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 10.0 0.0 90.0 3.8 0.63 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 582 001S1 SR INTEGRATIVE SEMINAR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Little, P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 69.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 13 100.0 3 hours 6 46.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 2 15.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 0.0 46.2 46.2 3.3 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 0.0 53.8 38.5 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 23.1 15.4 61.5 3.4 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 582 001S1 SR INTEGRATIVE SEMINAR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Little, P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 3.3 0.89 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 121 001L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Markowitz, Lisa SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 37.5 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 4 50.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 1 12.5 C 3 42.9 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 75.0 Studies Program 5 62.5 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 3 37.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 121 001L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Markowitz, Lisa % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 36.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 121 002L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Markowitz, Lisa SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 58.3 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 2 16.7 B 6 50.0 Junior 3 25.0 C 1 8.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 58.3 Studies Program 4 36.4 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 5 45.5 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 18.2 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 8.3 33.3 33.3 25.0 2.8 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 41.7 41.7 8.3 2.5 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 12