1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 242 001L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cochran, M. Ford SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 17 17.5 A 38 40.0 Sophomore 21 21.6 B 37 38.9 Junior 33 34.0 C 17 17.9 Senior 25 25.8 D 3 3.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 1.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 29 30.2 Studies Program 46 47.4 2 hours 38 39.6 Required by my major 41 42.3 3 hours 16 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 10.3 4 - 5 hours 10 10.4 6 - 7 hours 2 2.1 8 or more hours 1 1.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 98 0.0 3.1 63.3 33.7 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 98 4.1 22.4 60.2 13.3 2.8 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 98 5.1 14.3 61.2 19.4 2.9 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 97 10.3 18.6 54.6 16.5 2.8 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 98 8.2 18.4 53.1 20.4 2.9 0.84 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 97 0.0 11.3 64.9 23.7 3.1 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 98 1.0 13.3 63.3 22.4 3.1 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 98 7.1 28.6 44.9 19.4 2.8 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 97 2.1 16.5 46.4 35.1 3.1 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 98 0.0 1.0 29.6 69.4 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 85 0.0 0.0 55.3 44.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 97 0.0 2.1 52.6 45.4 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 97 3.1 15.5 50.5 30.9 3.1 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 97 0.0 6.2 62.9 30.9 3.2 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 76 1.3 10.5 75.0 13.2 3.0 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 90 1.1 15.6 70.0 13.3 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 79 1.3 24.1 63.3 11.4 2.8 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 94 0.0 8.5 70.2 21.3 3.1 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 95 7.4 32.6 43.2 16.8 2.7 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 98 5.1 23.5 51.0 20.4 2.9 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 95 1.1 12.6 38.9 47.4 3.3 0.74 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 242 001L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cochran, M. Ford % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 39 0.0 7.7 82.1 10.3 3.0 0.43 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 38 0.0 10.5 76.3 13.2 3.0 0.49 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 38 7.9 7.9 65.8 18.4 2.9 0.77 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 157 Number of forms scanned = 98 Number of forms with at least one student response = 98 Percent completed = 62.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 470 001S1 SENIOR SEMINAR:RECENT ADVANCES IN GLY SCIENCES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cochran, M. Ford SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 66.7 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 470 001S1 SENIOR SEMINAR:RECENT ADVANCES IN GLY SCIENCES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cochran, M. Ford % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 54.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 401G001L1 INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOL AND EVOLUTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ettensohn, Frank R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 61.5 Junior 4 30.8 C 1 7.7 Senior 9 69.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 11 84.6 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 15.4 4 - 5 hours 4 30.8 6 - 7 hours 4 30.8 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 28.6 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.95 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 14.3 7.1 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.95 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 401G001L1 INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOL AND EVOLUTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ettensohn, Frank R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 101 003L1 PHYSICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.3 A 8 34.8 Sophomore 8 34.8 B 9 39.1 Junior 8 34.8 C 6 26.1 Senior 6 26.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 56.5 Studies Program 7 30.4 2 hours 5 21.7 Required by my major 15 65.2 3 hours 2 8.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 2 8.7 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 26.1 34.8 39.1 3.1 0.81 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 26.1 60.9 13.0 2.9 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 13.0 39.1 43.5 4.3 2.4 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 13.0 82.6 4.3 2.9 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 9.5 4.8 85.7 0.0 2.8 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 4.3 26.1 60.9 8.7 2.7 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 38.9 50.0 5.6 2.6 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 4.3 39.1 47.8 8.7 2.6 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 26.1 56.5 17.4 2.9 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 47.8 43.5 4.3 2.5 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 40.9 45.5 9.1 2.6 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 22.2 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 28.6 66.7 4.8 2.8 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 35.0 55.0 5.0 2.6 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 18.2 68.2 13.6 3.0 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 56.5 34.8 0.0 2.3 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 8.7 34.8 56.5 0.0 2.5 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 13.0 30.4 52.2 4.3 2.5 0.79 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 101 003L1 PHYSICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 9 22.2 11.1 44.4 22.2 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 9 11.1 44.4 22.2 22.2 2.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 12.5 25.0 37.5 25.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 69.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 585 001L1 HYDROGEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fryar, Alan E. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 64.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 7.1 Senior 6 42.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 42.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.1 Required by my major 9 64.3 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 35.7 4 - 5 hours 5 35.7 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 26.7 40.0 26.7 2.9 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 13.3 40.0 40.0 3.1 0.92 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 26.7 53.3 13.3 2.7 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 6.7 0.0 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.80 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 13.3 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 585 001L1 HYDROGEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fryar, Alan E. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 101 002L1 PHYSICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 17.2 A 17 26.2 Sophomore 22 34.4 B 32 49.2 Junior 19 29.7 C 16 24.6 Senior 12 18.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 26.2 Studies Program 19 29.2 2 hours 24 36.9 Required by my major 40 61.5 3 hours 19 29.2 Other (e.g. elective) 6 9.2 4 - 5 hours 3 4.6 6 - 7 hours 1 1.5 8 or more hours 1 1.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 69 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 69 0.0 2.9 58.0 39.1 3.4 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 69 0.0 1.4 46.4 52.2 3.5 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 69 1.4 10.1 50.7 37.7 3.2 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 69 0.0 2.9 55.1 42.0 3.4 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 69 1.4 8.7 59.4 30.4 3.2 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 68 0.0 11.8 60.3 27.9 3.2 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 67 0.0 16.4 59.7 23.9 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 69 0.0 1.4 43.5 55.1 3.5 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 69 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 63 0.0 0.0 41.3 58.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 69 1.4 1.4 36.2 60.9 3.6 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 69 0.0 8.7 42.0 49.3 3.4 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 68 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 57 1.8 3.5 66.7 28.1 3.2 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 64 0.0 1.6 70.3 28.1 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 59 0.0 6.8 62.7 30.5 3.2 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 69 0.0 2.9 56.5 40.6 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 68 0.0 23.5 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 68 0.0 4.4 47.1 48.5 3.4 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 68 0.0 1.5 35.3 63.2 3.6 0.52 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 101 002L1 PHYSICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 96 Number of forms scanned = 69 Number of forms with at least one student response = 69 Percent completed = 71.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 555 001L1 STRATIGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 66.7 Junior 2 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 11.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 22.2 22.2 33.3 22.2 2.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 66.7 11.1 22.2 0.0 1.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 22.2 11.1 66.7 0.0 2.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 11.1 33.3 33.3 22.2 2.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 11.1 44.4 33.3 11.1 2.4 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 555 001L1 STRATIGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 461 001L1 IGNEOUS/METAMORPH PETROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 12.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 62.5 Junior 4 50.0 C 2 25.0 Senior 4 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 8 100.0 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 461 001L1 IGNEOUS/METAMORPH PETROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 461 002L1 IGNEOUS/METAMORPH PETROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 2 33.3 C 3 50.0 Senior 4 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 4 66.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 16.7 0.0 16.7 66.7 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 16.7 0.0 16.7 66.7 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 40.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 16.7 0.0 16.7 66.7 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 461 002L1 IGNEOUS/METAMORPH PETROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 720 001S1 GRAD TECTONICS SEMINAR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 25.0 Required by my major 2 50.0 3 hours 1 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 50.0 4 - 5 hours 1 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 20.0 0.0 0.0 80.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 720 001S1 GRAD TECTONICS SEMINAR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 260 001L1 MINERALOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 27.3 Sophomore 1 9.1 B 4 36.4 Junior 5 45.5 C 3 27.3 Senior 3 27.3 D 1 9.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 18.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 2 18.2 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 9.1 9.1 81.8 0.0 2.7 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 9.1 0.0 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 0.0 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 260 001L1 MINERALOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 624 001L1 MESOSCOPIC STRUCTURES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 25.0 Required by my major 2 50.0 3 hours 1 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 624 001L1 MESOSCOPIC STRUCTURES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 420G001L1 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rast, Nicholas SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 3 30.0 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 10 100.0 3 hours 4 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 420G001L1 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rast, Nicholas % % Strongly % % Strongly