1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 401L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 36.4 A 8 36.4 Sophomore 6 27.3 B 11 50.0 Junior 3 13.6 C 3 13.6 Senior 4 18.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 36.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 31.8 Required by my major 17 77.3 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 22.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 38.9 44.4 16.7 2.8 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 8.7 21.7 69.6 3.6 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 8.7 21.7 69.6 3.6 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 4.5 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 4.3 26.1 69.6 3.7 0.57 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 401L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 53.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 627 401S1 PROSEM PHYSIOLOG PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barron, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 80.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 10.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 40.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 60.0 4 - 5 hours 7 70.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 20.0 10.0 70.0 3.5 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 627 401S1 PROSEM PHYSIOLOG PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barron, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 767 001S1 TOP SEM BEH/NEUROSCIE: HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barron, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 12.5 2 hours 5 71.4 Required by my major 3 37.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 50.0 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 12.5 62.5 25.0 0.0 2.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 25.0 37.5 37.5 0.0 2.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 12.5 75.0 12.5 0.0 2.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 767 001S1 TOP SEM BEH/NEUROSCIE: HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barron, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 533 001L1 ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 50.0 Sophomore 1 3.6 B 10 35.7 Junior 14 50.0 C 2 7.1 Senior 13 46.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 28.6 Required by my major 15 55.6 3 hours 8 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 12 44.4 4 - 5 hours 6 21.4 6 - 7 hours 1 3.6 8 or more hours 1 3.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 6.5 48.4 45.2 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 9.7 48.4 41.9 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 3.2 6.5 54.8 35.5 3.2 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 12.9 48.4 38.7 3.3 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 30 3.3 13.3 53.3 30.0 3.1 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 73.1 26.9 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 0.0 64.5 35.5 3.4 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 3.3 0.0 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.67 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 533 001L1 ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 72.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 535 001L1 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 38.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 46.2 Junior 3 25.0 C 2 15.4 Senior 7 58.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 16.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 10 76.9 4 - 5 hours 5 38.5 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 2 15.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 33.3 25.0 41.7 3.1 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 535 001L1 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 54.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = PSY 459 401L1 DRUGS AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bevins, Rick A SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 25.9 Junior 2 7.1 C 2 7.4 Senior 25 89.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.6 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 32.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 32.1 Required by my major 4 14.3 3 hours 8 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 24 85.7 4 - 5 hours 2 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 13.8 51.7 34.5 3.2 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 6.9 37.9 55.2 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 44.8 55.2 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 39.3 60.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 6.9 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 10.7 64.3 25.0 3.1 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 11.1 63.0 25.9 3.1 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 10.7 46.4 42.9 3.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 6.9 37.9 55.2 3.5 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 10.3 20.7 69.0 3.6 0.68 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = PSY 459 401L1 DRUGS AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bevins, Rick A % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 93.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 778 001S1 TOP SEM DEVELOPMNTL PSY: PERCEPTUAL/COGNIT DEVEL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 778 001S1 TOP SEM DEVELOPMNTL PSY: PERCEPTUAL/COGNIT DEVEL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 003L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 77 56.6 A 55 40.4 Sophomore 40 29.4 B 70 51.5 Junior 14 10.3 C 11 8.1 Senior 5 3.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 52 38.2 Studies Program 12 8.9 2 hours 44 32.4 Required by my major 80 59.3 3 hours 26 19.1 Other (e.g. elective) 43 31.9 4 - 5 hours 11 8.1 6 - 7 hours 3 2.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 139 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 139 0.0 2.2 44.6 53.2 3.5 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 116 0.0 4.3 44.8 50.9 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 139 0.0 5.0 44.6 50.4 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 139 0.0 0.7 34.5 64.7 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 113 0.0 2.7 32.7 64.6 3.6 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 132 0.0 0.8 33.3 65.9 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 53 3.8 39.6 28.3 28.3 2.8 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 139 0.7 0.0 17.3 82.0 3.8 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 139 0.0 0.0 10.1 89.9 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 120 0.0 1.7 29.2 69.2 3.7 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 138 0.0 2.2 22.5 75.4 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 139 0.7 1.4 20.9 77.0 3.7 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 139 0.0 3.6 34.5 61.9 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 134 0.0 1.5 50.7 47.8 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 130 0.0 2.3 43.8 53.8 3.5 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 122 0.0 7.4 44.3 48.4 3.4 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 138 0.7 0.7 28.3 70.3 3.7 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 134 2.2 9.7 41.8 46.3 3.3 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 139 0.7 1.4 12.9 84.9 3.8 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 139 0.7 0.0 9.4 89.9 3.9 0.38 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 003L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 178 Number of forms scanned = 139 Number of forms with at least one student response = 139 Percent completed = 78.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 616 001L1 RES DESIGN CLINICAL PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 84.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 7.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 92.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.7 Required by my major 12 92.3 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 5 38.5 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 15.4 0.0 61.5 23.1 2.9 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 7.7 7.7 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.86 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 7.7 76.9 7.7 2.8 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 55.6 33.3 0.0 2.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 30.8 69.2 0.0 2.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 0.45 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7 2.7 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 38.5 46.2 7.7 2.5 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 53.8 30.8 15.4 2.6 0.77 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 616 001L1 RES DESIGN CLINICAL PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 50.0 37.5 12.5 2.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 302 002L1 PSYCHOLOGY IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 19.2 Sophomore 1 3.7 B 8 30.8 Junior 3 11.1 C 8 30.8 Senior 23 85.2 D 2 7.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 11.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 40.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 22.2 Required by my major 6 23.1 3 hours 6 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 20 76.9 4 - 5 hours 3 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 20.7 51.7 27.6 3.1 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 13.0 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 10.3 31.0 55.2 3.4 2.5 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 6.9 79.3 13.8 3.1 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 3.6 7.1 64.3 25.0 3.1 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 15.8 26.3 52.6 5.3 2.5 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 3.4 17.2 58.6 20.7 3.0 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 57.1 39.3 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 3.4 31.0 55.2 10.3 2.7 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 6.9 69.0 20.7 3.1 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 25.9 63.0 11.1 2.9 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 14.8 70.4 14.8 3.0 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 40.0 48.0 12.0 2.7 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 6.9 72.4 20.7 3.1 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 10.3 31.0 55.2 3.4 2.5 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 17.2 65.5 13.8 2.9 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 10.3 13.8 58.6 17.2 2.8 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 302 002L1 PSYCHOLOGY IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 65.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 424 001L1 HUMAN SENSES & PERCEPTN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 26.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 50.0 Junior 2 7.7 C 4 15.4 Senior 23 88.5 D 2 7.7 Graduate 1 3.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 26.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 19.2 Required by my major 19 73.1 3 hours 11 42.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 26.9 4 - 5 hours 1 3.8 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 1 3.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 7.7 42.3 50.0 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 3.8 19.2 76.9 3.7 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 7.7 30.8 57.7 3.4 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 4.3 4.3 65.2 26.1 3.1 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 4.0 8.0 40.0 48.0 3.3 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 8.3 50.0 37.5 3.2 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 3.8 19.2 42.3 34.6 3.1 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 11.5 26.9 57.7 3.4 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 8.0 16.0 76.0 3.7 0.63 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 424 001L1 HUMAN SENSES & PERCEPTN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 72.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 427 001L1 COGNITIVE PROCESSES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 24 47.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 23 45.1 Junior 3 5.9 C 4 7.8 Senior 48 94.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 17.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 33.3 Required by my major 46 92.0 3 hours 18 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 8.0 4 - 5 hours 6 11.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 53 0.0 0.0 35.8 64.2 3.6 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 53 18.9 34.0 37.7 9.4 2.4 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 7.3 65.9 26.8 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 53 0.0 11.3 49.1 39.6 3.3 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 53 0.0 7.5 45.3 47.2 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 46 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 50 0.0 0.0 22.0 78.0 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 23.5 44.1 29.4 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 53 0.0 1.9 18.9 79.2 3.8 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 53 0.0 0.0 13.2 86.8 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 51 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 53 1.9 5.7 22.6 69.8 3.6 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 53 3.8 5.7 39.6 50.9 3.4 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 53 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 6.5 69.6 23.9 3.2 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 53 0.0 3.8 56.6 39.6 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 49 0.0 12.2 51.0 36.7 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 53 0.0 1.9 43.4 54.7 3.5 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 53 5.7 26.4 49.1 18.9 2.8 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 53 0.0 3.8 41.5 54.7 3.5 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 53 0.0 1.9 17.0 81.1 3.8 0.45 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 427 001L1 COGNITIVE PROCESSES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 53 Number of forms with at least one student response = 53 Percent completed = 88.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 780 001S1 PROBLEMS IN PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 33.3 50.0 16.7 0.0 1.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 16.7 66.7 16.7 0.0 2.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 78