1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 302 001L1 SOCIO RESEARCH METHS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 2 11.8 B 10 55.6 Junior 9 52.9 C 1 5.6 Senior 6 35.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 11.8 Required by my major 15 83.3 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 16.7 4 - 5 hours 7 41.2 6 - 7 hours 3 17.6 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 0.0 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 36.8 36.8 26.3 2.9 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 302 001L1 SOCIO RESEARCH METHS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 76.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 452G001L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Billings, Dwight B SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 61.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 34.6 Junior 5 17.9 C 1 3.8 Senior 22 78.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 7.7 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 11 42.3 Required by my major 25 89.3 3 hours 9 34.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 7.1 4 - 5 hours 3 11.5 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 6.9 51.7 41.4 3.3 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 0.0 69.0 31.0 3.3 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 27.6 37.9 34.5 3.1 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 44.8 55.2 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 6.9 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 13.8 24.1 58.6 3.4 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 3.4 44.8 51.7 3.5 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.9 0.31 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 3.7 74.1 22.2 3.2 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 44.8 55.2 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 13.8 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 452G001L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Billings, Dwight B % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 76.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 635 001S1 PROSEMINAR IN WORK, GENDER, AND INEQUALITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Blee, Kathleen M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 91.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 8.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 41.7 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 58.3 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 2 16.7 8 or more hours 8 66.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 635 001S1 PROSEMINAR IN WORK, GENDER, AND INEQUALITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Blee, Kathleen M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 680 001L1 METHS SOCIAL INVESTIGATN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Blee, Kathleen M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 46.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 53.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 92.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 11 84.6 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 15.4 4 - 5 hours 5 38.5 6 - 7 hours 2 15.4 8 or more hours 4 30.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 680 001L1 METHS SOCIAL INVESTIGATN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Blee, Kathleen M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 014L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Emmerich, Robert J SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 60.9 A 12 54.5 Sophomore 7 30.4 B 9 40.9 Junior 2 8.7 C 1 4.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 34.8 Studies Program 19 82.6 2 hours 7 30.4 Required by my major 3 13.0 3 hours 5 21.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 2 8.7 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 9.1 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 12.5 0.0 54.2 33.3 3.1 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 1.02 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 8.3 25.0 33.3 33.3 2.9 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 24 12.5 8.3 33.3 45.8 3.1 1.03 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 13.6 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 22.7 59.1 18.2 3.0 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 38.9 50.0 11.1 2.7 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 9.1 27.3 31.8 31.8 2.9 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 12.5 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 12.5 8.3 45.8 33.3 3.0 0.98 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 014L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Emmerich, Robert J % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 48.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 260 001L1 POPULAT, RESOURC & CHNGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garkovich, Lorraine E SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 4.3 A 18 40.0 Sophomore 16 34.0 B 27 60.0 Junior 15 31.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 27.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 38.3 Studies Program 18 38.3 2 hours 18 38.3 Required by my major 25 53.2 3 hours 5 10.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 8.5 4 - 5 hours 4 8.5 6 - 7 hours 1 2.1 8 or more hours 1 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 0.0 3.8 36.5 59.6 3.6 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 52 0.0 13.5 48.1 38.5 3.3 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 52 0.0 7.7 36.5 55.8 3.5 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 0.0 3.8 44.2 51.9 3.5 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 0.0 1.9 44.2 53.8 3.5 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 52 0.0 1.9 42.3 55.8 3.5 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 51 2.0 3.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 52 1.9 5.8 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 1.9 9.6 38.5 50.0 3.4 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 0.0 0.0 28.8 71.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 42 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 0.0 5.8 40.4 53.8 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 52 5.8 3.8 38.5 51.9 3.4 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 52 0.0 11.5 40.4 48.1 3.4 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 51 7.8 0.0 54.9 37.3 3.2 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 7.7 5.8 50.0 36.5 3.2 0.85 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 48 8.3 4.2 52.1 35.4 3.1 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 52 5.8 0.0 48.1 46.2 3.3 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 7.7 17.3 36.5 38.5 3.1 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 52 3.8 7.7 30.8 57.7 3.4 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 52 0.0 9.6 26.9 63.5 3.5 0.67 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 260 001L1 POPULAT, RESOURC & CHNGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garkovich, Lorraine E % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 70 Number of forms scanned = 52 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 74.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 420 001L1 COMMUNITY ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Greider, T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 52.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 47.1 Junior 4 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 18.8 Required by my major 11 68.8 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 31.3 4 - 5 hours 5 31.3 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 0.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 5.3 0.0 26.3 68.4 3.6 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 3.4 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 0.0 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 5.0 0.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.76 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 5.0 0.0 35.0 60.0 3.5 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 0.0 35.0 60.0 3.5 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 0.0 10.0 85.0 3.8 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 0.0 15.0 80.0 3.7 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 0.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 5.0 0.0 35.0 60.0 3.5 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 20.0 30.0 45.0 3.2 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 5.3 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 5.3 21.1 68.4 3.5 0.84 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 420 001L1 COMMUNITY ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Greider, T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 74.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 004L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 42.1 A 6 31.6 Sophomore 7 36.8 B 10 52.6 Junior 2 10.5 C 3 15.8 Senior 2 10.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 63.2 Studies Program 13 68.4 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 4 21.1 3 hours 1 5.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.5 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 33.3 38.1 28.6 3.0 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 23.8 33.3 42.9 3.2 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 4.8 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 004L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 55.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 005L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 43.3 A 5 18.5 Sophomore 6 20.0 B 12 44.4 Junior 6 20.0 C 10 37.0 Senior 4 13.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 39.3 Studies Program 14 46.7 2 hours 11 39.3 Required by my major 10 33.3 3 hours 5 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 6 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 3.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 3.3 63.3 33.3 3.3 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 10.0 3.3 50.0 36.7 3.1 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 3.3 56.7 40.0 3.4 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 6.9 51.7 41.4 3.3 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 7.1 3.6 60.7 28.6 3.1 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 6.7 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 27 7.4 7.4 48.1 37.0 3.1 0.86 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 3.3 60.0 36.7 3.3 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 10.3 48.3 41.4 3.3 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 0.0 63.3 36.7 3.4 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 3.3 0.0 60.0 36.7 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 3.6 3.6 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 3.3 56.7 40.0 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 3.6 21.4 39.3 35.7 3.1 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 21.4 39.3 39.3 3.2 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 7.7 11.5 38.5 42.3 3.2 0.92 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 005L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 380 001L1 DEVEL NON-WEST SOCIETIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 76.5 Sophomore 3 16.7 B 2 11.8 Junior 3 16.7 C 1 5.9 Senior 11 61.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 22.2 Studies Program 7 38.9 2 hours 8 44.4 Required by my major 4 22.2 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 7 38.9 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 16.7 38.9 38.9 3.1 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 16.7 77.8 5.6 2.9 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 16.7 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 11.1 22.2 50.0 16.7 2.7 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 380 001L1 DEVEL NON-WEST SOCIETIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 641 001S1 GENDER ISSUES DEVELOPMNT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 8.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 16.7 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 10 83.3 4 - 5 hours 8 66.7 6 - 7 hours 3 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 8.3 83.3 3.8 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 641 001S1 GENDER ISSUES DEVELOPMNT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 8.3 0.0 16.7 75.0 3.6 0.90 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 235 001L1 INEQUALITY IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.0 A 5 20.8 Sophomore 6 24.0 B 17 70.8 Junior 7 28.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 44.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 8.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.0 Studies Program 4 16.7 2 hours 4 16.0 Required by my major 5 20.8 3 hours 12 48.0 Other (e.g. elective) 15 62.5 4 - 5 hours 5 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 8.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 3.8 0.0 46.2 50.0 3.4 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 11.5 46.2 42.3 3.3 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 3.0 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 3.8 23.1 50.0 23.1 2.9 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 7.7 26.9 65.4 3.6 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 11.5 38.5 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 3.8 3.8 46.2 46.2 3.3 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 15.4 42.3 42.3 3.3 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 235 001L1 INEQUALITY IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 74.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 350 003L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: DIMENSIONS OF AGING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 18.5 Sophomore 2 6.9 B 15 55.6 Junior 14 48.3 C 7 25.9 Senior 13 44.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 6.9 Studies Program 1 3.4 2 hours 4 13.8 Required by my major 3 10.3 3 hours 14 48.3 Other (e.g. elective) 25 86.2 4 - 5 hours 8 27.6 6 - 7 hours 1 3.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 43.3 56.7 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 3.3 53.3 43.3 3.4 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 10.0 53.3 36.7 3.3 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 3.3 16.7 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 10.0 46.7 43.3 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 3.3 26.7 70.0 3.7 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 6.7 43.3 50.0 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 23.3 76.7 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 3.3 36.7 60.0 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 0.0 13.3 36.7 50.0 3.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 6.9 41.4 51.7 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 39.3 60.7 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 10.0 56.7 33.3 3.2 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Spring 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 35