****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 002L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 46.2 A 8 61.5 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 3 23.1 Junior 1 7.7 C 2 15.4 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 7.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 46.2 Studies Program 13 100.0 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 84.6 7.7 3.0 0.41 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 15.4 23.1 46.2 15.4 2.6 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 30.8 38.5 23.1 2.8 0.93 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 0.0 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.87 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 7.7 30.8 53.8 7.7 2.6 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 41.7 33.3 16.7 2.6 0.90 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 15.4 46.2 30.8 7.7 2.3 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 15.4 76.9 0.0 2.7 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 54.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 003L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 47.6 A 10 47.6 Sophomore 8 38.1 B 10 47.6 Junior 1 4.8 C 1 4.8 Senior 2 9.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 52.4 Studies Program 21 100.0 2 hours 7 33.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 4.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 43.5 39.1 17.4 2.7 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 28.6 66.7 4.8 2.8 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 4.5 81.8 13.6 3.1 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 22.7 63.6 13.6 2.9 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 78.3 17.4 3.1 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 5.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 82.6 17.4 3.2 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 45.5 45.5 4.5 2.5 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 54.5 36.4 4.5 2.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 21.7 60.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 36.4 45.5 13.6 2.7 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 68.4 15.8 10.5 2.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 54.5 22.7 9.1 2.3 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 52.2 39.1 8.7 2.6 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 21.7 69.6 8.7 2.9 0.55. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 56.3 37.5 6.3 2.5 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 30.4 56.5 13.0 2.8 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 23 0.0 8.7 87.0 4.3 3.0 0.37 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 004L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 54.5 A 10 47.6 Sophomore 4 18.2 B 11 52.4 Junior 5 22.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 4.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 36.4 Studies Program 21 95.5 2 hours 5 22.7 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.5 4 - 5 hours 4 18.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 8.3 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 70.8 29.2 3.3 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 75.0 20.8 3.2 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 33.3 47.6 19.0 2.9 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 79.2 16.7 3.1 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.29 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 82.6 13.0 3.1 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 8.3 25.0 54.2 12.5 2.7 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 30.4 56.5 8.7 2.7 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 13.6 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 31.6 42.1 21.1 2.8 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 8.3 41.7 41.7 8.3 2.5 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 12.5 79.2 8.3 3.0 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 0.0 5.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 005L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 38.1 A 11 50.0 Sophomore 7 33.3 B 7 31.8 Junior 4 19.0 C 4 18.2 Senior 2 9.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 68.2 Studies Program 19 90.5 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 1 4.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 18.2 18.2 50.0 13.6 2.6 0.96 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 10.0 75.0 10.0 2.9 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 4.3 0.0 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 4.3 73.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 38.9 50.0 11.1 2.7 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 88.2 11.8 3.1 0.33 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 21.7 47.8 26.1 4.3 2.1 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 21 9.5 52.4 38.1 0.0 2.3 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 9.1 63.6 22.7 3.0 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 58.8 41.2 0.0 2.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 26.1 47.8 21.7 4.3 2.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 30.4 56.5 8.7 2.7 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 8.3 50.0 41.7 0.0 2.3 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 21 0.0 23.8 66.7 9.5 2.9 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 21 0.0 23.8 76.2 0.0 2.8 0.44 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 006L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 40.0 A 9 47.4 Sophomore 7 35.0 B 10 52.6 Junior 2 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 15.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 60.0 Studies Program 19 95.0 2 hours 6 30.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 5.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 9.1 4.5 59.1 27.3 3.0 0.84 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 19.0 14.3 52.4 14.3 2.6 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 13.6 4.5 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 4.5 0.0 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 9.1 4.5 63.6 22.7 3.0 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 4.5 4.5 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 4.5 4.5 77.3 13.6 3.0 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 14.3 23.8 57.1 4.8 2.5 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 13.6 36.4 40.9 9.1 2.5 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 4.5 9.1 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.83 11. Was available for consultation 15 6.7 0.0 80.0 13.3 3.0 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 42.9 28.6 23.8 4.8 1.9 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 20 25.0 50.0 20.0 5.0 2.1 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 9.1 0.0 68.2 22.7 3.0 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 11.1 55.6 22.2 11.1 2.3 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 9.5 9.5 66.7 14.3 2.9 0.79 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 30.0 40.0 20.0 10.0 2.1 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 18.2 27.3 50.0 4.5 2.4 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 13.6 31.8 36.4 18.2 2.6 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 0.76 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 21 19.0 28.6 42.9 9.5 2.4 0.93 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 22 9.1 13.6 68.2 9.1 2.8 0.75 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 22 4.5 4.5 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.71 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 25.0 12.5 62.5 0.0 2.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 007L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 52.4 A 13 61.9 Sophomore 7 33.3 B 7 33.3 Junior 3 14.3 C 1 4.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 42.9 Studies Program 20 95.2 2 hours 6 28.6 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 22.7 68.2 9.1 2.9 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 85.7 4.8 3.0 0.38 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.29 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 81.0 19.0 3.2 0.40 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 81.0 19.0 3.2 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 86.4 13.6 3.1 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 13.6 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 85.0 15.0 3.2 0.37 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 36.4 50.0 9.1 2.6 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 22 9.1 36.4 50.0 4.5 2.5 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 86.4 9.1 3.0 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 19.0 71.4 9.5 2.9 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 45.0 55.0 0.0 2.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 9.1 86.4 4.5 3.0 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 50.0 31.8 4.5 2.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 22.7 68.2 9.1 2.9 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 18.2 68.2 13.6 3.0 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 7.1 28.6 64.3 0.0 2.6 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 26.3 68.4 5.3 2.8 0.54 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 5.6 94.4 0.0 2.9 0.24 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 20 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.31 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 95.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 008L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 30.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 4 40.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 50.0 Studies Program 10 100.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 41.7 41.7 16.7 2.8 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 33.3 41.7 25.0 0.0 1.9 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 11 18.2 45.5 36.4 0.0 2.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 75.0 16.7 0.0 2.1 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 33.3 58.3 0.0 2.5 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.0 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 58.3 33.3 8.3 2.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 37.5 50.0 12.5 0.0 1.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 36.4 27.3 36.4 0.0 2.0 0.89 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 770 003S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR:GENDER, ETHNICITY AND HEALTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 4 66.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 350 003L1 TOPICS IN ANT: CULTURAL ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 40.0 Sophomore 2 16.7 B 5 50.0 Junior 2 16.7 C 1 10.0 Senior 7 58.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 3 27.3 3 hours 5 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 8 72.7 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 232 001L1 MODERN HUMAN VARIATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 3.0 A 15 46.9 Sophomore 3 9.1 B 16 50.0 Junior 11 33.3 C 1 3.1 Senior 18 54.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 15.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 39.4 Required by my major 28 84.8 3 hours 8 24.2 Other (e.g. elective) 5 15.2 4 - 5 hours 6 18.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 2.8 22.2 75.0 3.7 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 11.1 30.6 58.3 3.5 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 0.0 30.6 69.4 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 2.8 0.0 30.6 66.7 3.6 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 0.0 30.6 69.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 2.8 2.8 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 19.4 80.6 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 3.0 33.3 63.6 3.6 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 2.8 0.0 22.2 75.0 3.7 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 5.7 37.1 57.1 3.5 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 2.8 33.3 63.9 3.6 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 11.4 37.1 51.4 3.4 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 2.8 36.1 61.1 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 2.8 0.0 16.7 80.6 3.8 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 004L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 28.6 A 12 85.7 Sophomore 5 35.7 B 2 14.3 Junior 5 35.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 71.4 Studies Program 12 85.7 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 1 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 6.7 0.0 66.7 26.7 3.1 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 7.1 50.0 35.7 3.1 0.86 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 6.7 0.0 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 21.4 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 6.7 20.0 40.0 33.3 3.0 0.93 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 005L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 52.6 A 15 75.0 Sophomore 3 15.8 B 5 25.0 Junior 3 15.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 15.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 75.0 Studies Program 15 75.0 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 2 10.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 4.8 81.0 9.5 3.0 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 5.3 0.0 63.2 31.6 3.2 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 9.5 61.9 23.8 3.0 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 20.0 65.0 15.0 3.0 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 81.0 19.0 3.2 0.40 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 23.8 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 13.3 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.46 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 84.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 006L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 63.6 A 19 86.4 Sophomore 7 31.8 B 3 13.6 Junior 1 4.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 54.5 Studies Program 21 95.5 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 1 4.5 3 hours 2 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 5.9 17.6 47.1 29.4 3.0 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 13.6 45.5 40.9 3.3 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 30.0 20.0 50.0 3.2 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 52.4 23.8 19.0 2.6 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 19.0 42.9 38.1 3.2 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 31.3 31.3 37.5 3.1 0.85 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 007L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 45.5 A 22 100.0 Sophomore 9 40.9 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 4.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 4.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 59.1 Studies Program 19 86.4 2 hours 5 22.7 Required by my major 1 4.5 3 hours 4 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 27.3 31.8 40.9 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 13.6 31.8 54.5 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 22.7 40.9 31.8 3.0 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 22.7 45.5 31.8 3.1 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 14.3 52.4 33.3 3.2 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 38.9 27.8 33.3 2.9 0.87 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 18.2 68.2 9.1 2.8 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 13.6 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 008L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 42.1 A 15 75.0 Sophomore 4 21.1 B 5 25.0 Junior 3 15.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 21.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 68.4 Studies Program 13 76.5 2 hours 4 21.1 Required by my major 3 17.6 3 hours 1 5.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 15.0 15.0 35.0 35.0 2.9 1.07 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 15.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 3.7 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 5.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 15.8 31.6 52.6 3.4 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 31.3 43.8 3.2 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 2.8 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 15.8 31.6 47.4 3.2 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 21.1 21.1 57.9 3.4 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 8.3 25.0 41.7 25.0 2.8 0.94 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 009L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 52.4 A 17 81.0 Sophomore 8 38.1 B 4 19.0 Junior 1 4.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 57.1 Studies Program 17 81.0 2 hours 4 19.0 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 14.3 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 26.1 39.1 34.8 3.1 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 26.1 69.6 3.7 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 23.8 52.4 23.8 3.0 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 13.6 63.6 22.7 3.1 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 40.9 50.0 9.1 2.7 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 010L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 42.9 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 1 14.3 B 3 42.9 Junior 2 28.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 71.4 Studies Program 6 85.7 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 28.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 012L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 52.4 A 17 81.0 Sophomore 3 14.3 B 3 14.3 Junior 5 23.8 C 1 4.8 Senior 2 9.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 61.9 Studies Program 18 85.7 2 hours 7 33.3 Required by my major 3 14.3 3 hours 1 4.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 37.5 54.2 8.3 2.7 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 22.7 63.6 13.6 2.9 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 7.1 21.4 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.86 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 350 001L1 TOPICS IN ANT:NORTH AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 33.3 Sophomore 3 15.8 B 10 55.6 Junior 6 31.6 C 1 5.6 Senior 9 47.4 D 1 5.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 38.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 9 50.0 3 hours 3 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 9 50.0