****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 300 006L1 QUANT ANALY IN OPS MGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chung, Chen H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 95.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 4.5 Junior 9 40.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 59.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 72.7 Studies Program 2 9.1 2 hours 5 22.7 Required by my major 20 90.9 3 hours 1 4.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 18.2 18.2 45.5 18.2 2.6 1.00 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 13.6 36.4 50.0 3.4 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 18.2 40.9 40.9 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 18.2 36.4 40.9 3.1 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 4.3 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 52.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 406 001L1 PRODUC/INVENTORY CONTROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chung, Chen H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 33.3 Junior 3 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 18 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 57.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 14.3 Required by my major 21 100.0 3 hours 2 9.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 14.3 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 15.0 25.0 25.0 35.0 2.8 1.11 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 6.7 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 6.3 18.8 18.8 56.3 3.3 1.00 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DIS 300 005L1 QUANT ANALY IN OPS MGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gonsalves, Gerald ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 54.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 39.4 Junior 13 39.4 C 2 6.1 Senior 20 60.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 48.5 Studies Program 2 6.1 2 hours 7 21.2 Required by my major 31 93.9 3 hours 5 15.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 12.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 8.6 5.7 60.0 25.7 3.0 0.82 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 11.4 0.0 65.7 22.9 3.0 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 8.6 68.6 20.0 3.1 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 2.9 2.9 77.1 17.1 3.1 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 2.9 5.7 74.3 17.1 3.1 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 8.6 31.4 45.7 14.3 2.7 0.84 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 14.3 28.6 40.0 17.1 2.6 0.95 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 20.6 20.6 50.0 8.8 2.5 0.93 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 31.4 17.1 42.9 8.6 2.3 1.02 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 14.3 25.7 51.4 8.6 2.5 0.85 11. Was available for consultation 32 9.4 18.8 56.3 15.6 2.8 0.83 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 11.8 20.6 61.8 5.9 2.6 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 25.8 41.9 29.0 3.2 2.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 35 2.9 25.7 60.0 11.4 2.8 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 16.7 16.7 56.7 10.0 2.6 0.89 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 11.8 17.6 61.8 8.8 2.7 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 15.2 15.2 57.6 12.1 2.7 0.89 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 11.8 17.6 64.7 5.9 2.6 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 30.3 30.3 33.3 6.1 2.2 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 25.7 31.4 37.1 5.7 2.2 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 31.4 22.9 40.0 5.7 2.2 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 79.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DIS 300 401L1 QUANT ANALY IN OPS MGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gonsalves, Gerald ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 33.3 Junior 11 52.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 47.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 19.0 Required by my major 20 100.0 3 hours 8 38.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 69.6 30.4 3.3 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 78.3 17.4 3.1 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 78.3 17.4 3.1 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 0.0 73.9 21.7 3.1 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 8.7 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 4.3 17.4 56.5 21.7 3.0 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 18.2 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 13.6 31.8 36.4 18.2 2.6 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 14.3 66.7 14.3 2.9 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 13.0 69.6 17.4 3.0 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 8.7 73.9 17.4 3.1 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 30.4 47.8 13.0 2.7 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 8.7 17.4 69.6 4.3 2.7 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 17.4 52.2 26.1 3.0 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 69.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 621 001L1 BUSINESS EXPERT SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holsapple, Clyde W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 13 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 76.9 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 3 23.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 623 401L1 BUS DECISION SUPPORT SYS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holsapple, Clyde W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 14 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 9 64.3 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 35.7 4 - 5 hours 3 21.4 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 3 21.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 0.0 20.0 73.3 3.6 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 0.0 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 13.3 6.7 40.0 40.0 3.1 1.03 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 6.7 6.7 20.0 66.7 3.5 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 6.7 26.7 60.0 3.4 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 93.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 624 401L1 MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION RESOURCES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lederer, Al ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 85.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 15.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 20.0 Required by my major 11 55.0 3 hours 8 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 45.0 4 - 5 hours 4 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 450 001L1 DECISION ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Muralidhar, K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 63.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 16.7 Junior 3 10.0 C 6 20.0 Senior 27 90.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 43.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 20.0 Required by my major 23 76.7 3 hours 6 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 23.3 4 - 5 hours 5 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 3.2 0.0 64.5 32.3 3.3 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 16.7 23.3 46.7 13.3 2.6 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 3.2 3.2 45.2 48.4 3.4 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 3.2 0.0 41.9 54.8 3.5 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 3.2 6.5 38.7 51.6 3.4 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 3.2 0.0 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 3.2 0.0 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 6.7 16.7 46.7 30.0 3.0 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 3.2 0.0 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 3.2 0.0 35.5 61.3 3.5 0.68 11. Was available for consultation 29 3.4 0.0 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 3.2 0.0 48.4 48.4 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 3.2 6.5 54.8 35.5 3.2 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 31 3.2 3.2 61.3 32.3 3.2 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 20.7 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 6.5 38.7 54.8 3.5 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 68.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 001L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pakath, Ramakrishnan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 56.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 36.0 Junior 4 15.4 C 2 8.0 Senior 22 84.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 24.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 32.0 Required by my major 8 30.8 3 hours 7 28.0 Other (e.g. elective) 18 69.2 4 - 5 hours 3 12.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 20.7 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 6.9 13.8 58.6 20.7 2.9 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 17.9 50.0 32.1 3.1 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 10.3 44.8 44.8 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 10.3 65.5 24.1 3.1 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 10.7 10.7 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 3.4 20.7 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 10.3 62.1 27.6 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 17.2 31.0 37.9 13.8 2.5 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 31.0 44.8 20.7 2.8 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 3.4 17.2 58.6 20.7 3.0 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 3.4 17.2 58.6 20.7 3.0 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 24.1 55.2 20.7 3.0 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 21.4 39.3 25.0 14.3 2.3 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 13.8 24.1 44.8 17.2 2.7 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 13.8 10.3 34.5 41.4 3.0 1.05. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 29 0.0 0.0 27.6 72.4 0.0 3.7 0.45 38. Question 38 29 0.0 0.0 44.8 55.2 0.0 3.6 0.51 39. Question 39 29 6.9 3.4 44.8 44.8 0.0 3.3 0.84 40. Question 40 29 0.0 6.9 51.7 41.4 0.0 3.3 0.61 41. Question 41 29 0.0 3.4 37.9 58.6 0.0 3.6 0.57 42. Question 42 28 0.0 17.9 17.9 64.3 0.0 3.5 0.79 43. Question 43 29 10.3 17.2 37.9 34.5 0.0 3.0 0.98 44. Question 44 29 24.1 17.2 34.5 24.1 0.0 2.6 1.12 Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 87.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 002L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pakath, Ramakrishnan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 32.1 Junior 1 3.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 26 92.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 5 17.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 46.4 Required by my major 15 53.6 3 hours 5 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 13 46.4 4 - 5 hours 3 10.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 74.2 22.6 3.2 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 9.7 71.0 19.4 3.1 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 6.5 19.4 61.3 12.9 2.8 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 19.4 71.0 9.7 2.9 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 9.7 51.6 38.7 3.3 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 6.5 74.2 19.4 3.1 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 3.2 29.0 58.1 9.7 2.7 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 16.1 74.2 9.7 2.9 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 6.5 29.0 54.8 9.7 2.7 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 61.3 38.7 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 83.9 16.1 3.2 0.37 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 6.5 80.6 12.9 3.1 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 19.4 38.7 38.7 3.2 2.3 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 30 6.7 46.7 43.3 3.3 2.4 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 16.7 79.2 0.0 2.8 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 3.2 22.6 71.0 3.2 2.7 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 29.0 61.3 6.5 2.7 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 6.5 9.7 74.2 9.7 2.9 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 22.6 45.2 29.0 3.2 2.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 9.7 35.5 48.4 6.5 2.5 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 38.7 45.2 16.1 2.8 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 29 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 0.0 3.8 0.44 38. Question 38 29 0.0 3.4 51.7 44.8 0.0 3.4 0.57 39. Question 39 29 0.0 3.4 44.8 51.7 0.0 3.5 0.57 40. Question 40 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 0.0 3.3 0.55 41. Question 41 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 0.0 3.7 0.48 42. Question 42 29 0.0 6.9 31.0 62.1 0.0 3.6 0.63 43. Question 43 29 10.3 10.3 58.6 20.7 0.0 2.9 0.86 44. Question 44 29 20.7 27.6 34.5 17.2 0.0 2.5 1.02 Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 91.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = B&E 309 001L1 INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Debin, George J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 51.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 20.7 Junior 10 34.5 C 2 6.9 Senior 19 65.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 6 20.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 37.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 48.3 Required by my major 6 20.7 3 hours 3 10.3 Other (e.g. elective) 23 79.3 4 - 5 hours 1 3.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 3.2 6.5 38.7 51.6 3.4 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 12.9 48.4 38.7 3.3 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 3.1 15.6 81.3 3.8 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 6.3 28.1 65.6 3.6 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 3.1 34.4 62.5 3.6 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 32.0 12.0 56.0 3.2 0.93 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 15.6 37.5 46.9 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 3.1 25.0 71.9 3.7 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 3.7 40.7 55.6 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 3.2 48.4 48.4 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 12.5 28.1 59.4 3.5 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 3.1 21.9 75.0 3.7 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 16.7 43.3 40.0 3.2 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 3.3 23.3 33.3 40.0 3.1 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 3.2 41.9 54.8 3.5 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 6.5 9.7 41.9 41.9 3.2 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 15.6 31.3 53.1 3.4 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 3.1 12.5 21.9 62.5 3.4 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 86.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 006L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ali, Mukhtar M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 26.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 16 61.5 Junior 18 69.2 C 3 11.5 Senior 8 30.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 26.9 Studies Program 1 3.8 2 hours 13 50.0 Required by my major 25 96.2 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 15.4 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 1 3.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 3.3 73.3 23.3 3.2 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 10.0 43.3 36.7 10.0 2.5 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 3.3 16.7 63.3 16.7 2.9 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 13.3 16.7 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 0.0 76.7 23.3 3.2 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 13.8 62.1 24.1 3.1 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 3.3 10.0 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 3.3 30.0 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.89 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 6.9 41.4 34.5 17.2 2.6 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 0.0 63.3 36.7 3.4 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 5.6 5.6 83.3 5.6 2.9 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 3.6 60.7 32.1 3.2 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 3.6 7.1 53.6 35.7 3.2 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 3.4 10.3 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 11.1 44.4 40.7 3.7 2.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 6.7 23.3 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 73.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 790 001L1 TIME SERIES ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ali, Mukhtar M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 80.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 20.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 4 80.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 499 001S1 SEM ECONOMICS:THE KENTUCKY ECONOMY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berger, Mark C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 92.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 23.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 46.2 Required by my major 12 92.3 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 008L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bollinger, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 30.6 Sophomore 2 5.4 B 22 61.1 Junior 23 62.2 C 3 8.3 Senior 12 32.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 13.5 Studies Program 2 5.4 2 hours 15 40.5 Required by my major 34 91.9 3 hours 13 35.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.7 4 - 5 hours 3 8.1 6 - 7 hours 1 2.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 0.0 55.3 44.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 44.7 26.3 21.1 7.9 1.9 1.00 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 0.0 2.6 46.2 51.3 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 0.0 0.0 51.3 48.7 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 0.0 0.0 43.6 56.4 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 0.0 48.7 51.3 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 0.0 12.8 48.7 38.5 3.3 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 2.7 21.6 45.9 29.7 3.0 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 38 0.0 7.9 57.9 34.2 3.3 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 5.9 73.5 20.6 3.1 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 0.0 2.6 51.3 46.2 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 2.6 46.2 51.3 3.5 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 2.6 66.7 30.8 3.3 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 10.3 43.6 30.8 15.4 2.5 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 0.0 12.8 61.5 25.6 3.1 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 703 001L1 INTRO TO ECONOMETRICS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bollinger, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 56.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 43.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 13 72.2 3 hours 1 5.6 Other (e.g. elective) 5 27.8 4 - 5 hours 6 33.3 6 - 7 hours 3 16.7 8 or more hours 8 44.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 52.6 42.1 5.3 2.5 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 31.6 47.4 21.1 2.9 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 26.3 57.9 15.8 2.9 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 10.5 15.8 47.4 26.3 2.9 0.94 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 31.6 57.9 5.3 2.6 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 26.3 52.6 15.8 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 33.3 38.9 22.2 2.8 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 82.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 485G003L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fackler, J S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 42.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 45.5 Junior 20 58.8 C 4 12.1 Senior 14 41.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 23.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 19 55.9 Required by my major 29 87.9 3 hours 4 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 4 12.1 4 - 5 hours 3 8.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 5.7 82.9 11.4 3.1 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 5.7 77.1 17.1 3.1 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 3.3 83.3 13.3 3.1 0.40 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 2.9 71.4 25.7 3.2 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 11.4 71.4 17.1 3.1 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 3.4 3.4 69.0 24.1 3.1 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 2.9 74.3 22.9 3.2 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 3.0 33.3 48.5 15.2 2.8 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 2.9 8.8 73.5 14.7 3.0 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 5.7 54.3 40.0 3.3 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 5.7 22.9 65.7 5.7 2.7 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 2.9 45.7 40.0 11.4 2.6 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 34 11.8 41.2 35.3 11.8 2.5 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 28.6 67.9 3.6 2.8 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 14.3 77.1 8.6 2.9 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 17.1 77.1 5.7 2.9 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 8.6 80.0 11.4 3.0 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 8.6 40.0 45.7 5.7 2.5 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 3.0 30.3 51.5 15.2 2.8 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 3.0 24.2 57.6 15.2 2.8 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 702 001L1 ADV MACROECONOMIC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fackler, J S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 61.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 13 92.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.1 Pass or Audit 1 7.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 11 84.6 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 15.4 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 16.7 8 or more hours 2 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 8.3 0.0 25.0 66.7 3.5 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 201 007L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garen, John E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 41.9 A 11 37.9 Sophomore 8 25.8 B 12 41.4 Junior 5 16.1 C 4 13.8 Senior 2 6.5 D 1 3.4 Graduate 2 6.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.2 Pass or Audit 1 3.4 Reason for taking course N