****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 152 001L2 PRIN OF BIOLOGY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 27 21.8 A 65 53.3 Sophomore 53 42.7 B 54 44.3 Junior 30 24.2 C 3 2.5 Senior 11 8.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 0.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 1.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 25 20.2 Studies Program 6 4.9 2 hours 54 43.5 Required by my major 106 86.2 3 hours 24 19.4 Other (e.g. elective) 11 8.9 4 - 5 hours 14 11.3 6 - 7 hours 4 3.2 8 or more hours 3 2.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 142 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 139 5.8 10.8 54.7 28.8 3.1 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 116 5.2 4.3 53.4 37.1 3.2 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 142 0.0 0.7 33.8 65.5 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 139 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 102 1.0 3.9 46.1 49.0 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 137 0.0 0.7 37.2 62.0 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 76 1.3 26.3 34.2 38.2 3.1 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 142 0.0 1.4 38.0 60.6 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 142 0.0 0.0 30.3 69.7 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 130 0.0 3.1 42.3 54.6 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 142 0.7 1.4 37.3 60.6 3.6 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 141 2.1 10.6 42.6 44.7 3.3 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 139 1.4 15.1 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 107 2.8 13.1 44.9 39.3 3.2 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 127 0.8 7.1 56.7 35.4 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 110 1.8 15.5 47.3 35.5 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 134 0.0 3.0 48.5 48.5 3.5 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 131 2.3 30.5 35.1 32.1 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 141 0.7 5.7 52.5 41.1 3.3 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 140 0.0 5.7 32.9 61.4 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 189 Number of forms scanned = 143 Number of forms with at least one student response = 142 Percent completed = 75.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 011S1 BIO SEM:BIODIVERSITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 88.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 11.1 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 88.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 55.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 10.0 0.0 90.0 3.8 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 0.0 90.0 3.8 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 325 005L1 INTRODUCTORY ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, Jerry M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 45.5 Sophomore 2 18.2 B 4 36.4 Junior 5 45.5 C 2 18.2 Senior 4 36.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 9 81.8 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 18.2 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 18.2 9.1 54.5 18.2 2.7 1.01 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 20.0 10.0 50.0 20.0 2.7 1.06 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 18.2 9.1 54.5 18.2 2.7 1.01 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 10.0 0.0 70.0 20.0 3.0 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 18.2 18.2 36.4 27.3 2.7 1.10 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 325 006L1 INTRODUCTORY ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, Jerry M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 50.0 Sophomore 6 33.3 B 7 38.9 Junior 9 50.0 C 2 11.1 Senior 3 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 22.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 18 100.0 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 10.5 15.8 52.6 21.1 2.8 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 11.8 11.8 47.1 29.4 2.9 0.97 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 5.3 5.3 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 27.8 55.6 16.7 2.9 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 15.8 5.3 57.9 21.1 2.8 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 52.9 29.4 17.6 2.6 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 30.8 61.5 7.7 2.8 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 17.6 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 0.0 73.7 21.1 3.1 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 15.8 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 10.5 5.3 52.6 31.6 3.1 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 150 001L1 PRIN OF BIOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 28 45.9 A 22 36.1 Sophomore 22 36.1 B 19 31.1 Junior 6 9.8 C 17 27.9 Senior 4 6.6 D 3 4.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 1.6 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 6.6 Studies Program 6 9.8 2 hours 16 26.2 Required by my major 52 85.2 3 hours 23 37.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 4.9 4 - 5 hours 15 24.6 6 - 7 hours 3 4.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 68 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 67 0.0 3.0 62.7 34.3 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 68 0.0 16.2 52.9 30.9 3.1 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 68 0.0 42.6 45.6 11.8 2.7 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 68 2.9 10.3 60.3 26.5 3.1 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 68 0.0 1.5 69.1 29.4 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 68 0.0 0.0 51.5 48.5 3.5 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 68 4.4 23.5 57.4 14.7 2.8 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 68 1.5 2.9 60.3 35.3 3.3 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 68 0.0 0.0 39.7 60.3 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 64 0.0 0.0 65.6 34.4 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 68 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 66 3.0 12.1 62.1 22.7 3.0 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 67 0.0 9.0 70.1 20.9 3.1 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 52 3.8 9.6 80.8 5.8 2.9 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 67 0.0 13.4 68.7 17.9 3.0 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 62 1.6 14.5 64.5 19.4 3.0 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 68 0.0 4.4 67.6 27.9 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 67 1.5 28.4 55.2 14.9 2.8 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 67 1.5 1.5 65.7 31.3 3.3 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 66 0.0 6.1 57.6 36.4 3.3 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 32 0.0 3.1 75.0 21.9 3.2 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 32 0.0 3.1 78.1 18.8 3.2 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 32 6.3 34.4 46.9 12.5 2.7 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 176 Number of forms scanned = 68 Number of forms with at least one student response = 68 Percent completed = 38.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 150 002L1 PRIN OF BIOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 31 39.2 A 25 31.3 Sophomore 29 36.7 B 30 37.5 Junior 10 12.7 C 20 25.0 Senior 8 10.1 D 3 3.8 Graduate 1 1.3 E/Fail 1 1.3 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 19.0 Studies Program 7 8.9 2 hours 21 26.6 Required by my major 59 74.7 3 hours 25 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 13 16.5 4 - 5 hours 14 17.7 6 - 7 hours 3 3.8 8 or more hours 1 1.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 82 0.0 0.0 48.8 51.2 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 81 0.0 12.3 56.8 30.9 3.2 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 82 0.0 12.2 61.0 26.8 3.1 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 82 9.8 32.9 46.3 11.0 2.6 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 82 0.0 12.2 57.3 30.5 3.2 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 82 0.0 4.9 61.0 34.1 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 81 0.0 0.0 43.2 56.8 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 78 3.8 26.9 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 82 0.0 11.0 57.3 31.7 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 82 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 77 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 80 0.0 0.0 67.5 32.5 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 81 4.9 25.9 45.7 23.5 2.9 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 81 1.2 11.1 61.7 25.9 3.1 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 59 0.0 27.1 59.3 13.6 2.9 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 75 1.3 12.0 65.3 21.3 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 69 1.4 20.3 59.4 18.8 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 77 1.3 7.8 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 76 7.9 31.6 44.7 15.8 2.7 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 80 1.3 26.3 57.5 15.0 2.9 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 80 1.3 20.0 50.0 28.8 3.1 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 39 2.6 10.3 61.5 25.6 3.1 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 38 2.6 7.9 71.1 18.4 3.1 0.61 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 38 2.6 13.2 63.2 21.1 3.0 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 12.5 25.0 25.0 37.5 2.9 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 8.3 8.3 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.90 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 246 Number of forms scanned = 83 Number of forms with at least one student response = 82 Percent completed = 33.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 315 002L1 INTRO TO CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bonner, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 20.6 Sophomore 8 23.5 B 13 38.2 Junior 10 29.4 C 9 26.5 Senior 14 41.2 D 5 14.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 2.9 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 23.5 Required by my major 23 69.7 3 hours 11 32.4 Other (e.g. elective) 10 30.3 4 - 5 hours 6 17.6 6 - 7 hours 3 8.8 8 or more hours 6 17.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 2.7 64.9 32.4 3.3 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 0.0 0.0 45.9 54.1 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 8.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 8.3 30.6 38.9 22.2 2.8 0.91 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 5.3 18.4 52.6 23.7 2.9 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 4.0 12.0 56.0 28.0 3.1 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 2.7 2.7 48.6 45.9 3.4 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 9.7 32.3 38.7 19.4 2.7 0.91 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 7.9 18.4 47.4 26.3 2.9 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 0.0 23.7 76.3 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 5.6 58.3 36.1 3.3 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 2.6 5.3 52.6 39.5 3.3 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 2.6 23.7 42.1 31.6 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 37 2.7 21.6 56.8 18.9 2.9 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 3.7 22.2 44.4 29.6 3.0 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 2.8 55.6 41.7 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 5.9 8.8 44.1 41.2 3.2 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 5.3 55.3 39.5 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 2.7 29.7 37.8 29.7 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 5.4 18.9 40.5 35.1 3.1 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 5.4 18.9 43.2 32.4 3.0 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 64 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 59.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 542 001L1 HISTOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bonner, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 29.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 29.4 Junior 1 5.9 C 2 11.8 Senior 9 52.9 D 1 5.9 Graduate 2 11.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 5 29.4 Pass or Audit 4 23.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 2 11.8 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 15 88.2 4 - 5 hours 6 35.3 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 11.8 17.6 47.1 23.5 2.8 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 28.6 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.95 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 11.8 5.9 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.86 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 17.6 35.3 47.1 3.3 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 6.7 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 11.8 23.5 64.7 3.5 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 0.0 41.2 47.1 3.2 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 16 18.8 12.5 50.0 18.8 2.7 1.01 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 17.6 35.3 41.2 3.1 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 0.0 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 68.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 542 002L1 HISTOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bonner, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 16.7 Senior 6 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 2 33.3 3 hours 3 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 66.7 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 16.7 50.0 33.3 0.0 2.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 42.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = BIO 102 001L1 HUMAN ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burke, William ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 70 60.3 A 45 39.1 Sophomore 26 22.4 B 53 46.1 Junior 12 10.3 C 15 13.0 Senior 8 6.9 D 2 1.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 54 46.6 Studies Program 106 93.8 2 hours 37 31.9 Required by my major 5 4.4 3 hours 13 11.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 1.8 4 - 5 hours 11 9.5 6 - 7 hours 1 0.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 122 0.8 0.0 42.6 56.6 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 121 2.5 4.1 60.3 33.1 3.2 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 115 0.9 12.2 54.8 32.2 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 122 0.8 1.6 42.6 54.9 3.5 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 122 0.0 4.1 44.3 51.6 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 116 0.9 3.4 48.3 47.4 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 120 0.0 5.0 55.8 39.2 3.3 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 83 3.6 41.0 34.9 20.5 2.7 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 123 0.0 4.1 46.3 49.6 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 123 0.0 0.8 30.1 69.1 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 114 0.0 0.9 53.5 45.6 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 122 0.0 2.5 42.6 54.9 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 121 1.7 18.2 46.3 33.9 3.1 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 123 0.0 5.7 48.0 46.3 3.4 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 118 0.0 8.5 63.6 28.0 3.2 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 116 0.0 12.9 57.8 29.3 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 114 0.9 20.2 50.9 28.1 3.1 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 120 0.0 6.7 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 121 5.0 35.5 38.8 20.7 2.8 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 122 0.8 9.8 59.0 30.3 3.2 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 122 0.0 5.7 44.3 50.0 3.4 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 107 0.0 9.3 61.7 29.0 3.2 0.59 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 106 0.0 6.6 67.0 26.4 3.2 0.54 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 104 0.0 13.5 57.7 28.8 3.2 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 36 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.65 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 34 0.0 11.8 73.5 14.7 3.0 0.52 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 290 Number of forms scanned = 127 Number of forms with at least one student response = 123 Percent completed = 42.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 003L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 44.0 Sophomore 3 12.0 B 11 44.0 Junior 11 44.0 C 3 12.0 Senior 11 44.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 12.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 40.0 Required by my major 24 96.0 3 hours 4 16.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.0 4 - 5 hours 7 28.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 4.0 12.0 24.0 60.0 3.4 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 43.8 25.0 25.0 2.7 0.95 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 11.5 7.7 57.7 23.1 2.9 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 7.7 0.0 65.4 26.9 3.1 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 7.7 0.0 76.9 15.4 3.0 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 23 8.7 39.1 34.8 17.4 2.6 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 10.0 0.0 70.0 20.0 3.0 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 16.7 62.5 20.8 3.0 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 3.8 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 96.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 004L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.2 A 10 41.7 Sophomore 3 12.5 B 13 54.2 Junior 11 45.8 C 1 4.2 Senior 8 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 16.7 Studies Program 1 4.2 2 hours 8 33.3 Required by my major 19 79.2 3 hours 5 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 4 16.7 4 - 5 hours 4 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 4.2 8 or more hours 2 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 16.7 45.8 33.3 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 40.0 40.0 13.3 2.6 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 8.3 25.0 62.5 4.2 2.6 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 29.2 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 24 4.2 41.7 45.8 8.3 2.6 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 31.8 68.2 0.0 2.7 0.48 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 12.5 20.8 62.5 4.2 2.6 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 315 001L1 INTRO TO CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 24.3 Sophomore 5 13.2 B 15 40.5 Junior 14 36.8 C 11 29.7 Senior 17 44.7 D 2 5.4 Graduate 1 2.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 10.5 Studies Program 1 2.6 2 hours 11 28.9 Required by my major 21 55.3 3 hours 9 23.7 Other (e.g. elective) 16 42.1 4 - 5 hours 11 28.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 7.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 2.6 76.9 20.5 3.2 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 0.0 7.7 48.7 43.6 3.4 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 7.1 10.7 60.7 21.4 3.0 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 10.0 22.5 52.5 15.0 2.7 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 5.0 32.5 40.0 22.5 2.8 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 7.7 64.1 28.2 3.2 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 11.1 33.3 38.9 16.7 2.6 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 23.1 35.9 30.8 10.3 2.3 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 2.6 2.6 61.5 33.3 3.3 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 2.6 28.2 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 15.8 34.2 36.8 13.2 2.5 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 39 0.0 17.9 61.5 20.5 3.0 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 27.3 50.0 18.2 2.8 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 5.3 18.4 52.6 23.7 2.9 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 5.1 20.5 51.3 23.1 2.9 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 5.1 15.4 56.4 23.1 3.0 0.78 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 10.3 38.5 38.5 12.8 2.5 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 5.3 23.7 47.4 23.7 2.9 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 18.4 34.2 28.9 18.4 2.5 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 70 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 57.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 410 001L2 LAB IN GENETICS AND CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 20.0 Senior 5 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 410 002L2 LAB IN GENETICS AND CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 30.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 70.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 70.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 10.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 50.0 Required by my major 4 44.4 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 55.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 2 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 27.3 18.2 45.5 9.1 2.4 1.03 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 2.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 003S1 BIO SEM:NEUROMODULATN OF SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Robin L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 88.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 4 44.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 11.1 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 11.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 88.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 77.8 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 22.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 11.1 0.0 33.3 55.6 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 12.5 0.0 12.5 75.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 11.1 0.0 11.1 77.8 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 11.1 0.0 11.1 77.8 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 12.5 0.0 12.5 75.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 12.5 0.0 12.5 75.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 11.1 0.0 11.1 77.8 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 12.5 0.0 37.5 50.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 11.1 0.0 11.1 77.8 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 12.5 0.0 37.5 50.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 11.1 0.0 22.2 66.7 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 0.0 33.3 55.6 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 004S1 BIO SEM: EFFECT OF ETOH ON NEURONAL FUNCTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Robin L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 6 46.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 53.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 92.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.7 Required by my major 12 92.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 001S1 BIO SEM:AGGRESSION, SOCIAL DOMINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crowley, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 90.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 70.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 8 80.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 22.2 11.1 33.3 33.3 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** *************