****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 107 001L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ades, Harriet F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 36 66.7 A 21 38.2 Sophomore 12 22.2 B 16 29.1 Junior 2 3.7 C 14 25.5 Senior 4 7.4 D 3 5.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.8 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 1.9 Studies Program 10 18.5 2 hours 13 24.1 Required by my major 42 77.8 3 hours 18 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 3.7 4 - 5 hours 14 25.9 6 - 7 hours 5 9.3 8 or more hours 3 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 63 1.6 0.0 68.3 30.2 3.3 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 63 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 61 0.0 6.6 54.1 39.3 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 62 0.0 8.1 72.6 19.4 3.1 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 63 0.0 0.0 65.1 34.9 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 63 0.0 3.2 63.5 33.3 3.3 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 55 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 10.0 46.7 33.3 10.0 2.4 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 62 12.9 27.4 45.2 14.5 2.6 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 62 3.2 11.3 48.4 37.1 3.2 0.76 11. Was available for consultation 61 1.6 1.6 60.7 36.1 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 63 3.2 22.2 54.0 20.6 2.9 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 62 19.4 30.6 38.7 11.3 2.4 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 59 10.2 39.0 40.7 10.2 2.5 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 7.9 28.9 55.3 7.9 2.6 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 55 1.8 9.1 54.5 34.5 3.2 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 59 1.7 11.9 50.8 35.6 3.2 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 62 0.0 11.3 61.3 27.4 3.2 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 62 19.4 37.1 30.6 12.9 2.4 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 62 3.2 30.6 45.2 21.0 2.8 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 62 19.4 19.4 43.5 17.7 2.6 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 33.3 53.3 13.3 2.8 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 170 Number of forms scanned = 169 Number of forms with at least one student response = 63 Percent completed = 37.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 107 004L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ades, Harriet F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 33 63.5 A 13 25.5 Sophomore 9 17.3 B 23 45.1 Junior 3 5.8 C 13 25.5 Senior 6 11.5 D 2 3.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 5.9 Studies Program 7 14.3 2 hours 16 31.4 Required by my major 40 81.6 3 hours 15 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 4.1 4 - 5 hours 10 19.6 6 - 7 hours 5 9.8 8 or more hours 2 3.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 0.0 5.8 67.3 26.9 3.2 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 52 1.9 7.7 65.4 25.0 3.1 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 52 1.9 5.8 59.6 32.7 3.2 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 3.8 17.3 53.8 25.0 3.0 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 0.0 9.6 67.3 23.1 3.1 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 51 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 20.8 25.0 41.7 12.5 2.5 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 19.2 28.8 30.8 21.2 2.5 1.04 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 1.9 5.8 55.8 36.5 3.3 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 48 0.0 2.1 58.3 39.6 3.4 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 1.9 15.4 55.8 26.9 3.1 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 51 21.6 35.3 29.4 13.7 2.4 0.98 14. Encouraged class participation 49 10.2 30.6 44.9 14.3 2.6 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 2.9 22.9 62.9 11.4 2.8 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 49 0.0 12.2 71.4 16.3 3.0 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 50 0.0 10.0 66.0 24.0 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 50 2.0 16.0 62.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 27.3 29.5 36.4 6.8 2.2 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 51 7.8 29.4 54.9 7.8 2.6 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 51 13.7 25.5 39.2 21.6 2.7 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 0.34 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 175 Number of forms scanned = 174 Number of forms with at least one student response = 54 Percent completed = 30.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 736 001L1 TOPICS IN ORGANIC CHE: ORGANIC MATERIALS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anthony, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 40.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 55.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 001A4 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 53 59.6 A 19 21.8 Sophomore 20 22.5 B 44 50.6 Junior 7 7.9 C 22 25.3 Senior 7 7.9 D 2 2.3 Graduate 1 1.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 1.2 Studies Program 13 14.9 2 hours 11 13.1 Required by my major 70 80.5 3 hours 24 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 4.6 4 - 5 hours 31 36.9 6 - 7 hours 11 13.1 8 or more hours 6 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 98 0.0 6.1 72.4 21.4 3.2 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 106 3.8 10.4 71.7 14.2 3.0 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 105 2.9 10.5 76.2 10.5 2.9 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 108 17.6 38.9 38.0 5.6 2.3 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 106 2.8 28.3 63.2 5.7 2.7 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 106 0.9 7.5 79.2 12.3 3.0 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 96 1.0 4.2 76.0 18.8 3.1 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 70 5.7 18.6 65.7 10.0 2.8 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 59 6.8 22.0 64.4 6.8 2.7 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 99 1.0 11.1 73.7 14.1 3.0 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 98 0.0 11.2 74.5 14.3 3.0 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 99 0.0 9.1 80.8 10.1 3.0 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 94 27.7 44.7 24.5 3.2 2.0 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 71 9.9 25.4 56.3 8.5 2.6 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 62 12.9 32.3 50.0 4.8 2.5 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 138 Number of forms scanned = 129 Number of forms with at least one student response = 111 Percent completed = 80.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 002A4 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 61 70.1 A 15 17.9 Sophomore 20 23.0 B 42 50.0 Junior 3 3.4 C 25 29.8 Senior 3 3.4 D 2 2.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 1.2 Studies Program 10 11.8 2 hours 6 7.1 Required by my major 69 81.2 3 hours 32 38.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 7.1 4 - 5 hours 31 36.9 6 - 7 hours 10 11.9 8 or more hours 4 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 102 2.0 10.8 64.7 22.5 3.1 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 110 1.8 8.2 67.3 22.7 3.1 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 111 2.7 6.3 73.9 17.1 3.1 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 111 11.7 36.0 45.0 7.2 2.5 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 110 4.5 23.6 60.9 10.9 2.8 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 111 0.0 9.9 73.0 17.1 3.1 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 108 0.9 1.9 73.1 24.1 3.2 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 93 9.7 20.4 59.1 10.8 2.7 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 70 4.3 28.6 60.0 7.1 2.7 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 107 2.8 6.5 70.1 20.6 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 107 2.8 7.5 71.0 18.7 3.1 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 109 1.8 6.4 72.5 19.3 3.1 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 106 16.0 46.2 34.0 3.8 2.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 45 4.4 24.4 60.0 11.1 2.8 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 41 19.5 17.1 53.7 9.8 2.5 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 134 Number of forms scanned = 123 Number of forms with at least one student response = 111 Percent completed = 82.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 003A2 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 39 75.0 A 13 25.0 Sophomore 9 17.3 B 26 50.0 Junior 2 3.8 C 12 23.1 Senior 2 3.8 D 1 1.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 9 17.0 2 hours 12 23.1 Required by my major 43 81.1 3 hours 13 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 1.9 4 - 5 hours 19 36.5 6 - 7 hours 6 11.5 8 or more hours 2 3.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 58 12.1 8.6 65.5 13.8 2.8 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 59 5.1 11.9 61.0 22.0 3.0 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 61 4.9 11.5 67.2 16.4 3.0 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 62 19.4 30.6 40.3 9.7 2.4 0.91 5. Grading was fair and consistent 62 12.9 16.1 58.1 12.9 2.7 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 61 4.9 6.6 68.9 19.7 3.0 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 61 4.9 4.9 73.8 16.4 3.0 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 57 15.8 26.3 52.6 5.3 2.5 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 21.4 35.7 28.6 14.3 2.4 1.01 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 26.7 13.3 33.3 26.7 2.6 1.18 11. Was available for consultation 17 17.6 35.3 29.4 17.6 2.5 1.01 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 41.7 16.7 25.0 16.7 2.2 1.19 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 46.7 20.0 20.0 13.3 2.0 1.13 14. Encouraged class participation 13 38.5 15.4 30.8 15.4 2.2 1.17 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 43 9.3 16.3 67.4 7.0 2.7 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 58 6.9 6.9 72.4 13.8 2.9 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 57 7.0 10.5 70.2 12.3 2.9 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 59 8.5 8.5 69.5 13.6 2.9 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 57 26.3 31.6 36.8 5.3 2.2 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 16.7 26.7 43.3 13.3 2.5 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 40.7 25.9 18.5 14.8 2.1 1.11. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 37.5 0.0 62.5 0.0 2.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 25.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 25.0 0.0 62.5 12.5 2.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 82 Number of forms scanned = 70 Number of forms with at least one student response = 62 Percent completed = 75.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 004A4 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 58 71.6 A 13 16.0 Sophomore 13 16.0 B 46 56.8 Junior 7 8.6 C 22 27.2 Senior 3 3.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 1.2 Studies Program 11 13.9 2 hours 5 6.2 Required by my major 62 78.5 3 hours 14 17.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 7.6 4 - 5 hours 32 39.5 6 - 7 hours 18 22.2 8 or more hours 11 13.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 94 4.3 9.6 61.7 24.5 3.1 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 100 2.0 12.0 62.0 24.0 3.1 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 99 2.0 11.1 65.7 21.2 3.1 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 100 20.0 31.0 41.0 8.0 2.4 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 98 9.2 22.4 55.1 13.3 2.7 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 99 2.0 7.1 75.8 15.2 3.0 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 98 1.0 3.1 73.5 22.4 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 79 7.6 16.5 60.8 15.2 2.8 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 15.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 5.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 13.6 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 35.0 50.0 10.0 2.7 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 73.7 15.8 3.1 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 64 7.8 18.8 65.6 7.8 2.7 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 97 5.2 8.2 64.9 21.6 3.0 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 99 5.1 7.1 70.7 17.2 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 98 4.1 8.2 73.5 14.3 3.0 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 94 19.1 41.5 35.1 4.3 2.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 11.6 16.3 60.5 11.6 2.7 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 10.0 32.5 45.0 12.5 2.6 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 134 Number of forms scanned = 112 Number of forms with at least one student response = 101 Percent completed = 75.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 548 001L1 PRIN OF PHYSICAL CHEM II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Butterfield, D. Allan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 55.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 15.0 Senior 3 15.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 17 85.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 4 20.0 Required by my major 13 65.0 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 30.0 4 - 5 hours 6 30.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 1 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 41.7 33.3 25.0 2.8 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 27.8 66.7 5.6 2.8 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 95.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 535 001L1 SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CHEM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cammers-Goodwin, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 91.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 16.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 58.3 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 4 33.3 8 or more hours 3 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 33.3 41.7 25.0 2.9 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 441G001A1 PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Grev, Roger ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 36.8 Junior 6 31.6 C 5 26.3 Senior 13 68.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 19 100.0 3 hours 1 5.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 21.1 6 - 7 hours 5 26.3 8 or more hours 9 47.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 36.8 31.6 26.3 5.3 2.0 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 21.1 68.4 5.3 2.7 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 16.7 22.2 55.6 5.6 2.5 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 23.5 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 10.0 60.0 25.0 3.1 0.76 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 21.1 36.8 31.6 10.5 2.3 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 18.8 75.0 6.3 2.9 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 15.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 30.0 55.0 15.0 2.9 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 15.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 26.3 31.6 36.8 5.3 2.2 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 20.0 35.0 40.0 5.0 2.3 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 15.0 35.0 30.0 20.0 2.6 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 33. Amount of work appropriate 12 41.7 33.3 16.7 8.3 1.9 1.00 34. Instructor explained expectations 12 8.3 16.7 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.75 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 10.0 0.0 70.0 20.0 3.0 0.82 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 12 25.0 25.0 41.7 8.3 2.3 0.98 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 74.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 232 002L1 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Grossman, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 17.6 Sophomore 23 65.7 B 17 50.0 Junior 8 22.9 C 10 29.4 Senior 3 8.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 2.9 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 8.6 Required by my major 32 91.4 3 hours 8 22.9 Other (e.g. elective) 3 8.6 4 - 5 hours 9 25.7 6 - 7 hours 10 28.6 8 or more hours 5 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 2.9 65.7 31.4 3.3 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 5.7 62.9 31.4 3.3 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 3.6 14.3 64.3 17.9 3.0 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 29.4 32.4 32.4 5.9 2.1 0.93 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 11.4 40.0 40.0 8.6 2.5 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 24.1 55.2 17.2 3.4 2.0 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 5.7 34.3 45.7 14.3 2.7 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 34.3 65.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 35 5.7 8.6 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.78 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 77.1 22.9 3.2 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 22.9 42.9 31.4 2.9 2.1 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 5.7 68.6 25.7 3.2 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 30.4 56.5 13.0 2.8 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 2.9 14.7 67.6 14.7 2.9 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 3.0 15.2 69.7 12.1 2.9 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 5.9 5.9 70.6 17.6 3.0 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 30.3 36.4 27.3 6.1 2.1 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 5.7 37.1 48.6 8.6 2.6 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 14.7 35.3 35.3 14.7 2.5 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 69 Number of forms scanned = 69 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 50.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 580 001L1 TOPICS IN CHEMISTRY: BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Haley, Boyd E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 47.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 44.7 Junior 5 12.2 C 1 2.6 Senior 15 36.6 D 2 5.3 Graduate 20 48.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 2.4 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 35.0 Studies Program 2 5.0 2 hours 9 22.5 Required by my major 20 50.0 3 hours 11 27.5 Other (e.g. elective) 18 45.0 4 - 5 hours 2 5.0 6 - 7 hours 2 5.0 8 or more hours 2 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 0.0 53.7 46.3 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 22.9 22.9 42.9 11.4 2.4 0.98 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 13.6 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 2.4 9.8 39.0 48.8 3.3 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 0.0 48.8 51.2 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 2.4 9.8 34.1 53.7 3.4 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 18.8 37.5 37.5 6.3 2.3 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 4.9 19.5 34.1 41.5 3.1 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 31.7 68.3 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 34 2.9 11.8 47.1 38.2 3.2 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 9.8 43.9 46.3 3.4 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 5.0 17.5 45.0 32.5 3.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 41 0.0 2.4 61.0 36.6 3.3 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 3.3 10.0 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 5.1 7.7 56.4 30.8 3.1 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 5.1 15.4 48.7 30.8 3.1 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 2.5 5.0 57.5 35.0 3.3 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 10.0 20.0 52.5 17.5 2.8 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 4.9 17.1 36.6 41.5 3.1 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 41 2.4 14.6 36.6 46.3 3.3 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 85.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 226 001L1 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holler, F. James ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 1 20.0 B 3 60.0 Junior 4 80.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 60.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 14.3 0.0 85.7 0.0 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 28.6 0.0 57.1 14.3 2.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 16.7 50.0 33.3 0.0 2.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 14.3 0.0 85.7 0.0 2.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 2.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 41.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 626 001L1 ADV ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lodder, Robert A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 33.3 2 hours 2 33.3 Required by my major 4 66.7 3 hours 4 66.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 50.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 2.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 16.7 33.3 16.7 33.3 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 33.3 16.7 33.3 16.7 2.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 50.0 16.7 33.3 0.0 1.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 26.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 230 001L1 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Meier, Mark S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 2.8 A 15 21.1 Sophomore 40 56.3 B 25 35.2 Junior 15 21.1 C 25 35.2 Senior 11 15.5 D 5 7.0 Graduate 3 4.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 4.3 Studies Program 1 1.4 2 hours 7 10.0 Required by my major 60 85.7 3 hours 20 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 9 12.9 4 - 5 hours 24 34.3 6 - 7 hours 10 14.3 8 or more hours 6 8.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 79 0.0 0.0 45.6 54.4 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 79 0.0 5.1 39.2 55.7 3.5 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 51 2.0 9.8 51.0 37.3 3.2 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 79 3.8 16.5 58.2 21.5 3.0 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 79 0.0 7.6 68.4 24.1 3.2 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 46 0.0 10.9 54.3 34.8 3.2 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 76 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 66 1.5 37.9 36.4 24.2 2.8 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 79 0.0 1.3 36.7 62.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 79 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 77 0.0 1.3 42.9 55.8 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 79 0.0 1.3 45.6 53.2 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 78 3.8 11.5 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 78 0.0 1.3 47.4 51.3 3.5 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 51 0.0 25.5 47.1 27.5 3.0 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 75 0.0 1.3 68.0 30.7 3.3 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 75 0.0 1.3 61.3 37.3 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 76 1.3 3.9 60.5 34.2 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 72 6.9 31.9 43.1 18.1 2.7 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 77 1.3 13.0 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 78 0.0 2.6 33.3 64.1 3.6 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 165 Number of forms scanned = 163 Number of forms with at least one student response = 80 Percent completed = 48.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 231 001A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 4.1 A 31 63.3 Sophomore 25 51.0 B 16 32.7 Junior 15 30.6 C 2 4.1 Senior 4 8.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 6.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 8.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 30.6 Required by my major 42 85.7 3 hours 18 36.7 Other (e.g. elective) 7 14.3 4 - 5 hours 12 24.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 54 0.0 1.9 59.3 38.9 3.4 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 53 1.9 3.8 62.3 32.1 3.2 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 54 0.0 5.6 53.7 40.7 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 3.8 3.8 51.9 40.4 3.3 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 1.9 3.8 53.8 40.4 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 52 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 0.0 2.2 56.5 41.3 3.4 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 2.5 7.5 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 54 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 54 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 48 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 53 0.0 3.8 52.8 43.4 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 52 3.8 17.3 55.8 23.1 3.0 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 52 0.0 15.4 55.8 28.8 3.1 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 40 0.0 12.5 55.0 32.5 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 52 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 54 0.0 1.9 57.4 40.7 3.4 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 51 3.9 29.4 49.0 17.6 2.8 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 53 0.0 9.4 66.0 24.5 3.2 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 53 0.0 5.7 49.1 45.3 3.4 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 33. Amount of work appropriate 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 34. Instructor explained expectations 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 35. Instructor helped with my problems 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 23 0.0 17.4 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.69 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 70 Number of forms scanned = 70 Number of forms with at least one student response = 54 Percent completed = 77.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 231 002A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 61.8 Sophomore 17 50.0 B 8 23.5 Junior 8 23.5 C 5 14.7 Senior 8 23.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 2.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 20.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 35.3 Required by my major 32 94.1 3 hours 7 20.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.9 4 - 5 hours 6 17.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 2.4 53.7 43.9 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 0.0 12.2 65.9 22.0 3.1 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 2.4 73.2 24.4 3.2 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 0.0 5.3 71.1 23.7 3.2 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 0.0 2.5 77.5 20.0 3.2 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 2.8 19.4 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 0.0 11.8 67.6 20.6 3.1 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 0.0 17.1 46.3 36.6 3.2 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 4.9 48.8 46.3 3.4 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 38 2.6 10.5 50.0 36.8 3.2 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 9.8 48.8 41.5 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 2.4 29.3 48.8 19.5 2.9 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 27.5 55.0 17.5 2.9 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 3.8 23.1 50.0 23.1 2.9 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 0.0 7.3 68.3 24.4 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 40 2.5 7.5 67.5 22.5 3.1 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 2.4 73.2 24.4 3.2 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 7.5 40.0 37.5 15.0 2.6 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 0.0 17.1 68.3 14.6 3.0 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 2.6 15.4 51.3 30.8 3.1 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 33. Amount of work appropriate 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 34. Instructor explained expectations 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 35. Instructor helped with my problems 15 6.7 20.0 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.83 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 16 6.3 25.0 43.8 25.0 2.9 0.89 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 68 Number of forms scanned = 66 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 60.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 233 001A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 9 40.9 B 7 31.8 Junior 5 22.7 C 2 9.1 Senior 8 36.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 13.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 22.7 Required by my major 17 77.3 3 hours 9 40.9 Other (e.g. elective) 5 22.7 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 3 13.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 6.7 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 80.8 15.4 3.1 0.43 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 3.3 6.7 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 6.5 3.2 67.7 22.6 3.1 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 6.9 10.3 69.0 13.8 2.9 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 3.3 70.0 26.7 3.2 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 18.5 63.0 18.5 3.0 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 6.5 67.7 25.8 3.2 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 6.9 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 6.5 61.3 32.3 3.3 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 13.8 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 19.4 58.1 22.6 3.0 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 18.2 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 10.0 56.7 33.3 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 3.3 6.7 63.3 26.7 3.1 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 10.0 26.7 53.3 10.0 2.6 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 7.4 11.1 70.4 11.1 2.9 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 33. Amount of work appropriate 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 34. Instructor explained expectations 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 35. Instructor helped with my problems 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 16 6.3 6.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.77 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 51 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 59.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. *