****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 631 001S1 PROSEM INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Morgan, Susan E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 61.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 38.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 13 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 6 50.0 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 50.0 4 - 5 hours 6 46.2 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 6.7 0.0 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 7.1 50.0 35.7 3.1 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 7.1 0.0 57.1 35.7 3.2 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 0.0 53.8 38.5 3.2 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 15.4 38.5 38.5 3.1 0.95 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 7.7 23.1 30.8 38.5 3.0 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 7.7 7.7 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.86 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 0.0 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 7.7 38.5 46.2 3.2 0.93 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 35.7 50.0 7.1 2.6 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 41.7 41.7 8.3 2.5 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 7.7 0.0 69.2 23.1 3.1 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 15.4 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 28.6 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 14 7.1 14.3 28.6 50.0 3.2 0.97 28. Guided student report preparation 14 7.1 28.6 42.9 21.4 2.8 0.89 29. Students free to express opinions 14 14.3 0.0 14.3 71.4 3.4 1.09 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 14 7.1 21.4 35.7 35.7 3.0 0.96 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 1.07 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 665 001L1 COM RES METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Palmgreen, Philip C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 10.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 3 hours 5 55.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 2 22.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 8.3 83.3 3.8 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 645 401L1 PROSEM MASS COMM THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Robinson, Karla ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 87.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 12.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 16 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 61.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 38.5 4 - 5 hours 5 31.3 6 - 7 hours 8 50.0 8 or more hours 3 18.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 11.8 5.9 82.4 3.7 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 11.8 82.4 3.8 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 11.8 82.4 3.8 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 28. Guided student report preparation 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 29. Students free to express opinions 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 31. Developed abil to conduct research 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 94.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 287 002L1 PERSUASIVE SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bostrom, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 8.3 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 3 25.0 B 4 33.3 Junior 4 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 33.3 Studies Program 6 50.0 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 4 33.3 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 16.7 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 3.3 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 8.3 0.0 33.3 58.3 3.4 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 57.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 482 001L1 PERSUASION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bostrom, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 47.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 52.6 Junior 5 26.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 14 73.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 57.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 15 78.9 3 hours 3 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 4 21.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 15.8 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 5.3 10.5 68.4 15.8 2.9 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 5.3 5.3 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 10.5 10.5 63.2 15.8 2.8 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 16.7 27.8 44.4 11.1 2.5 0.92 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 29.4 35.3 35.3 0.0 2.1 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 26.3 42.1 26.3 2.9 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 36.8 36.8 21.1 2.7 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 23.5 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 23.5 64.7 11.8 2.9 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 35.3 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 29.4 58.8 11.8 2.8 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 11.1 16.7 61.1 11.1 2.7 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 11.1 27.8 38.9 22.2 2.7 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 65.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 181 202L1 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowdy, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 23.5 A 16 100.0 Sophomore 10 58.8 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 17.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 14 82.4 2 hours 9 52.9 Required by my major 3 17.6 3 hours 1 5.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 21.1 47.4 26.3 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 15.8 78.9 3.7 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 6.7 6.7 13.3 73.3 3.5 0.92 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 0.0 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 33.3 22.2 38.9 2.9 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 5.3 31.6 57.9 3.4 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 5.3 89.5 3.8 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 11.1 33.3 33.3 22.2 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 3.3 0.89 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 8.3 16.7 25.0 50.0 3.2 1.03 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 82.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 009L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 19.0 A 14 66.7 Sophomore 14 66.7 B 7 33.3 Junior 3 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 40.0 Studies Program 15 71.4 2 hours 8 40.0 Required by my major 5 23.8 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 4.2 4.2 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 18.2 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 50.0 27.3 22.7 2.7 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 4.2 37.5 54.2 3.4 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 46.2 38.5 15.4 2.7 0.75 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 010L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 31.8 A 19 86.4 Sophomore 13 59.1 B 3 13.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 22.7 Studies Program 15 75.0 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 5 25.0 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 18.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 12.0 28.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 4.0 4.0 36.0 56.0 3.4 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 20.0 36.0 44.0 3.2 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 0.0 44.0 52.0 3.4 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 4.0 24.0 72.0 3.7 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 8.0 24.0 64.0 3.5 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 4.0 0.0 36.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 20.0 28.0 48.0 3.2 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 8.3 37.5 54.2 3.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 0.0 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 96.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 281 401L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.8 A 16 76.2 Sophomore 9 42.9 B 5 23.8 Junior 6 28.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 9.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 4.8 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 23.8 Studies Program 9 42.9 2 hours 8 38.1 Required by my major 9 42.9 3 hours 3 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 14.3 4 - 5 hours 5 23.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 13.6 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 9.1 63.6 22.7 3.0 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 13.6 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 9.5 38.1 42.9 9.5 2.5 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 4.8 19.0 61.9 14.3 2.9 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 13.6 77.3 9.1 3.0 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 14.3 19.0 47.6 19.0 2.7 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 22 9.1 4.5 45.5 40.9 3.2 0.91 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 4.5 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 28.6 52.4 19.0 2.9 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 4.5 4.5 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 18.2 40.9 22.7 18.2 2.4 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 31.8 45.5 22.7 2.9 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 9.5 19.0 38.1 33.3 3.0 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 95.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 001L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 47 67.1 A 21 30.0 Sophomore 12 17.1 B 26 37.1 Junior 6 8.6 C 20 28.6 Senior 5 7.1 D 1 1.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 2.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 38.0 Studies Program 39 57.4 2 hours 21 29.6 Required by my major 14 20.6 3 hours 14 19.7 Other (e.g. elective) 15 22.1 4 - 5 hours 8 11.3 6 - 7 hours 1 1.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 81 1.2 0.0 35.8 63.0 3.6 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 79 10.1 20.3 36.7 32.9 2.9 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 83 3.6 9.6 42.2 44.6 3.3 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 83 2.4 1.2 41.0 55.4 3.5 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 82 4.9 4.9 40.2 50.0 3.4 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 82 2.4 3.7 46.3 47.6 3.4 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 83 4.8 9.6 44.6 41.0 3.2 0.81 8. Graded assignments included comments 80 10.0 30.0 27.5 32.5 2.8 1.00 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 82 0.0 3.7 24.4 72.0 3.7 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 82 1.2 0.0 17.1 81.7 3.8 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 76 0.0 3.9 35.5 60.5 3.6 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 82 1.2 4.9 25.6 68.3 3.6 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 82 0.0 4.9 26.8 68.3 3.6 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 82 1.2 3.7 24.4 70.7 3.6 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 80 1.3 6.3 41.3 51.3 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 78 1.3 2.6 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 77 1.3 9.1 42.9 46.8 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 79 1.3 1.3 36.7 60.8 3.6 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 80 1.3 10.0 42.5 46.3 3.3 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 82 0.0 2.4 29.3 68.3 3.7 0.53 21. Overall quality of teaching 80 3.8 0.0 11.3 85.0 3.8 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 23 0.0 21.7 52.2 26.1 3.0 0.71 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 31 3.2 9.7 32.3 54.8 3.4 0.80 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.81 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 125 Number of forms scanned = 83 Number of forms with at least one student response = 83 Percent completed = 66.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 002L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 45 52.9 A 43 51.8 Sophomore 22 25.9 B 33 39.8 Junior 13 15.3 C 6 7.2 Senior 5 5.9 D 1 1.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 37 44.0 Studies Program 40 48.2 2 hours 23 27.4 Required by my major 30 36.1 3 hours 20 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 13 15.7 4 - 5 hours 4 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 96 0.0 0.0 36.5 63.5 3.6 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 93 6.5 23.7 40.9 29.0 2.9 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 95 0.0 3.2 53.7 43.2 3.4 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 96 0.0 2.1 34.4 63.5 3.6 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 96 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 95 0.0 1.1 36.8 62.1 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 96 0.0 2.1 50.0 47.9 3.5 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 92 0.0 16.3 44.6 39.1 3.2 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 95 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 95 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 86 1.2 2.3 27.9 68.6 3.6 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 95 0.0 0.0 23.2 76.8 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 95 0.0 1.1 10.5 88.4 3.9 0.36 14. Encouraged class participation 95 0.0 2.1 24.2 73.7 3.7 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 94 0.0 3.2 31.9 64.9 3.6 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 93 0.0 2.2 31.2 66.7 3.6 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 87 0.0 5.7 31.0 63.2 3.6 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 94 0.0 1.1 25.5 73.4 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 93 0.0 10.8 24.7 64.5 3.5 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 94 0.0 2.1 11.7 86.2 3.8 0.42 21. Overall quality of teaching 94 0.0 1.1 7.4 91.5 3.9 0.33. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 125 Number of forms scanned = 96 Number of forms with at least one student response = 96 Percent completed = 76.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 454 001S1 HONORS SEM IN COMM: COMMUNICATION AND RACE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 31.8 Junior 5 22.7 C 1 4.5 Senior 17 77.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 18.2 Required by my major 6 27.3 3 hours 11 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 16 72.7 4 - 5 hours 5 22.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 16.7 8.3 50.0 25.0 2.8 1.03 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 181 007L1 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Sally ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 17.6 A 8 50.0 Sophomore 1 5.9 B 8 50.0 Junior 5 29.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 41.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 15 88.2 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 2 11.8 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 47.1 17.6 35.3 0.0 1.9 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 11.1 27.8 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.85 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 5.6 5.6 72.2 16.7 3.0 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 5.6 22.2 44.4 27.8 2.9 0.87 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 0.0 61.1 33.3 3.2 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 5.6 27.8 61.1 3.4 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 11.1 16.7 44.4 27.8 2.9 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 0.0 81.3 12.5 3.0 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 11.8 0.0 76.5 11.8 2.9 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 14.3 21.4 50.0 14.3 2.6 0.93 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 17.6 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 42.9 28.6 28.6 0.0 1.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 22.2 16.7 50.0 11.1 2.5 0.99 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 16.7 0.0 27.8 55.6 3.2 1.11. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 1.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 33.3 22.2 22.2 22.2 2.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 33.3 33.3 22.2 11.1 2.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 525 001L1 ORGANIZATIONAL COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Knuf, Joachim M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 82.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 17.6 Junior 3 15.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 78.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 36.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 12 66.7 3 hours 3 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 33.3 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 25.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 15.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 15.8 21.1 63.2 3.5 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 15.8 15.8 68.4 3.5 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 74.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 581 001L1 STUDIES IN SMALL GROUP COMM ECONTEXTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Knuf, Joachim M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 20.0 Junior 3 13.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 17 77.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 9.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 36.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 11 50.0 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 11 50.0 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 8.7 13.0 43.5 34.8 3.0 0.93 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 82.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 281 001L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lane, Derek ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.3 A 9 39.1 Sophomore 5 21.7 B 14 60.9 Junior 7 30.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 43.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 17.4 Studies Program 11 47.8 2 hours 11 47.8 Required by my major 9 39.1 3 hours 4 17.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 13.0 4 - 5 hours 3 13.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 3.8 3.8 34.6 57.7 3.5 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 8.0 32.0 60.0 3.5 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 8.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 12.0 48.0 40.0 3.3 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 4.0 20.0 76.0 3.7 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 4.0 16.0 80.0 3.8 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 89.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 281 002L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lane, Derek ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 14.8 A 19 70.4 Sophomore 4 14.8 B 8 29.6 Junior 9 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 26.9 Studies Program 13 48.1 2 hours 4 15.4 Required by my major 11 40.7 3 hours 8 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 11.1 4 - 5 hours 5 19.2 6 - 7 hours 2 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 3.7 25.9 70.4 3.7 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 8.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 365 001L1 INTRO TO COMM RES METH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lane, Derek ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 11.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 72.2 Junior 13 68.4 C 3 16.7 Senior 6 31.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 10.5 2 hours 2 10.5 Required by my major 17 89.5 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 6 31.6 6 - 7 hours 3 15.8 8 or more hours 3 15.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 17.4 43.5 39.1 3.2 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 26.1 43.5 30.4 3.0 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 8.7 30.4 60.9 3.5 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 30.4 65.2 3.6 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 8.7 13.0 30.4 47.8 3.2 0.98 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 13.6 45.5 40.9 3.3 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 9.5 14.3 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 13.6 45.5 40.9 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 76.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 402L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 13.6 A 21 95.5 Sophomore 16 72.7 B 1 4.5 Junior 1 4.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 68.2 Studies Program 4 18.2 2 hours 5 22.7 Required by my major 16 72.7 3 hours 1 4.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.1 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly