****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 235 001L1 WORLD POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 28.9 A 2 5.3 Sophomore 13 34.2 B 29 76.3 Junior 4 10.5 C 7 18.4 Senior 9 23.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 15.8 Studies Program 4 11.4 2 hours 15 39.5 Required by my major 15 42.9 3 hours 10 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 16 45.7 4 - 5 hours 4 10.5 6 - 7 hours 2 5.3 8 or more hours 1 2.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 12.8 61.5 25.6 3.1 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 0.0 10.3 56.4 33.3 3.2 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 10.3 23.1 46.2 20.5 2.8 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 23.7 26.3 42.1 7.9 2.3 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 5.7 25.7 54.3 14.3 2.8 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 2.6 10.3 64.1 23.1 3.1 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 22.2 30.6 36.1 11.1 2.4 0.96 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 10.3 30.8 38.5 20.5 2.7 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 35 8.6 11.4 65.7 14.3 2.9 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 28.9 31.6 28.9 10.5 2.2 0.99 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 20.5 12.8 43.6 23.1 2.7 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 38 18.4 21.1 50.0 10.5 2.5 0.92 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 5.7 14.3 57.1 22.9 3.0 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 10.3 10.3 51.3 28.2 3.0 0.90 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 18.2 21.2 45.5 15.2 2.6 0.97 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 5.1 10.3 51.3 33.3 3.1 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 13.2 21.1 47.4 18.4 2.7 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 20.5 15.4 33.3 30.8 2.7 1.12 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 28.9 28.9 23.7 18.4 2.3 1.09. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 40.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 1.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 68 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 57.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 461G001L1 CIVIL LIBERTIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Canon, Bradley C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 25.0 Sophomore 4 14.3 B 15 53.6 Junior 13 46.4 C 6 21.4 Senior 11 39.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 14.3 Studies Program 2 7.1 2 hours 12 42.9 Required by my major 15 53.6 3 hours 9 32.1 Other (e.g. elective) 11 39.3 4 - 5 hours 2 7.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 0.0 6.1 48.5 45.5 3.4 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 12.1 51.5 36.4 3.2 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 3.0 48.5 48.5 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 12.1 60.6 27.3 3.2 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 3.0 63.6 33.3 3.3 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 3.0 6.1 60.6 30.3 3.2 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 9.1 48.5 42.4 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 0.0 30.3 69.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 3.1 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 0.0 3.0 45.5 51.5 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 3.1 15.6 31.3 50.0 3.3 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 6.1 45.5 48.5 3.4 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 10.3 69.0 20.7 3.1 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 9.1 57.6 33.3 3.2 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 14.3 53.6 32.1 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 0.0 6.1 48.5 45.5 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 3.0 12.1 51.5 33.3 3.2 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 3.0 6.1 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 3.0 6.1 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 465G001L1 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Canon, Bradley C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 40.6 Sophomore 1 3.0 B 12 37.5 Junior 15 45.5 C 4 12.5 Senior 17 51.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 9.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 15.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 39.4 Required by my major 17 51.5 3 hours 11 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 16 48.5 4 - 5 hours 2 6.1 6 - 7 hours 2 6.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 6.1 36.4 57.6 3.5 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 3.0 39.4 57.6 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 2.9 47.1 50.0 3.5 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 0.0 11.8 50.0 38.2 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 2.9 38.2 58.8 3.6 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 2.9 8.8 41.2 47.1 3.3 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 5.9 50.0 44.1 3.4 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 68.8 28.1 3.3 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 2.9 52.9 44.1 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 10.3 41.4 48.3 3.4 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 0.0 17.6 26.5 55.9 3.4 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 2.9 44.1 52.9 3.5 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = PS 419G001L1 GOVTS & POL EASTERN ASIA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Coonan, Pamela ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 31.6 Sophomore 2 9.5 B 9 47.4 Junior 8 38.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 52.4 D 2 10.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 10.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 21.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 14 70.0 3 hours 4 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 30.0 4 - 5 hours 4 21.1 6 - 7 hours 2 10.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 14.3 33.3 52.4 0.0 2.4 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 19.0 71.4 4.8 2.8 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 14.3 28.6 47.6 9.5 2.5 0.87 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 9.5 28.6 61.9 0.0 2.5 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 19.0 28.6 47.6 4.8 2.4 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 52.4 42.9 4.8 2.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 19.0 42.9 38.1 0.0 2.2 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 38.1 28.6 28.6 4.8 2.0 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 19.0 23.8 42.9 14.3 2.5 0.98 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 42.9 23.8 33.3 0.0 1.9 0.89 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 33.3 38.1 23.8 4.8 2.0 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 21 4.8 14.3 76.2 4.8 2.8 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 19.0 81.0 0.0 2.8 0.40 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 15.8 42.1 42.1 0.0 2.3 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 23.5 47.1 23.5 5.9 2.1 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 19.0 14.3 61.9 4.8 2.5 0.87 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 19.0 47.6 28.6 4.8 2.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 33.3 38.1 28.6 0.0 2.0 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 38.1 52.4 4.8 4.8 1.8 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 212 002L1 CULT/POL IN THIRD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 19 47.5 A 10 25.0 Sophomore 10 25.0 B 21 52.5 Junior 8 20.0 C 8 20.0 Senior 3 7.5 D 1 2.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 35.0 Studies Program 22 55.0 2 hours 13 32.5 Required by my major 14 35.0 3 hours 10 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 10.0 4 - 5 hours 1 2.5 6 - 7 hours 1 2.5 8 or more hours 1 2.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 0.0 0.0 76.2 23.8 3.2 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 7.1 26.2 54.8 11.9 2.7 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 7.0 16.3 62.8 14.0 2.8 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 44 0.0 4.5 75.0 20.5 3.2 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 2.4 11.9 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 2.4 14.3 64.3 19.0 3.0 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 2.3 4.7 74.4 18.6 3.1 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 43 2.3 16.3 72.1 9.3 2.9 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 4.7 11.6 60.5 23.3 3.0 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 43 0.0 2.3 58.1 39.5 3.4 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 2.7 75.7 21.6 3.2 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 2.3 4.7 69.8 23.3 3.1 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 7.1 31.0 50.0 11.9 2.7 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 43 2.3 20.9 67.4 9.3 2.8 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 9.5 76.2 14.3 3.0 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 4.9 17.1 63.4 14.6 2.9 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 5.4 21.6 59.5 13.5 2.8 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 2.4 4.8 81.0 11.9 3.0 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 43 7.0 41.9 41.9 9.3 2.5 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 7.0 18.6 60.5 14.0 2.8 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 4.5 15.9 56.8 22.7 3.0 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 0.36 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.0 2.9 0.29 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 68 Number of forms scanned = 68 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 66.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 538 001L1 CONFLICT/COOPERATION IN LATIN AMERICAN RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 42.9 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 42.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 42.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 42.9 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 731 001S1 INTERNATIONAL SECURITY/ CONFLICT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Desch, Michael ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 33.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 66.7 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 4 44.4 8 or more hours 3 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 11.1 0.0 22.2 66.7 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 16.7 16.7 0.0 66.7 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 64.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 491 001L1 SP TOP IN PS: THE POLITICS OF POVERTY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fording, Richard C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 70.0 Junior 6 60.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 4 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 10.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 4 40.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 50.0 4 - 5 hours 4 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 672 001S1 INTRO TECHS POL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fording, Richard C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 42.9 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 5 71.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 271 001L1 INTRO POLITICAL BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gabel, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 18.2 A 9 42.9 Sophomore 9 40.9 B 6 28.6 Junior 2 9.1 C 6 28.6 Senior 7 31.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 54.5 Studies Program 4 18.2 2 hours 4 18.2 Required by my major 15 68.2 3 hours 2 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 3 13.6 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 21.7 47.8 30.4 3.1 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 17.4 47.8 34.8 3.2 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 13.6 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 17.4 69.6 13.0 3.0 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 4.3 17.4 34.8 43.5 3.2 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 17.4 21.7 34.8 26.1 2.7 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 14.3 52.4 33.3 3.2 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 4.3 56.5 34.8 3.2 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 8.7 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 8.7 0.0 56.5 34.8 3.2 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 34.8 34.8 21.7 2.7 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 13.0 13.0 52.2 21.7 2.8 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 26.1 34.8 34.8 3.0 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 50 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 46.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 756 001S1 REGIONAL POLITICS:EUROPE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gabel, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 14.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 14.3 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 3 42.9 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 42.9 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 3 42.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 245 001L1 INTRO POLITICAL ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gross, Donald A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 15.8 A 8 40.0 Sophomore 6 31.6 B 9 45.0 Junior 6 31.6 C 3 15.0 Senior 4 21.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 25.0 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 12 60.0 Required by my major 15 88.2 3 hours 3 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 25.0 54.2 16.7 2.8 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 83.3 12.5 3.1 0.41 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 8.3 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 4.2 20.8 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 29.2 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 76.2 23.8 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 8.3 29.2 45.8 16.7 2.7 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 8.7 78.3 8.7 2.9 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 10.0 65.0 20.0 3.0 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 13.0 56.5 26.1 3.0 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 34.8 43.5 17.4 2.7 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 25.0 45.8 25.0 2.9 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 29.2 41.7 29.2 3.0 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 680 001S1 PROSEM POL INSTS PROC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gross, Donald A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 42.9 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 57.1 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 3 42.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 480G001L1 GOVERNMENT & THE ECONOMY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hager, Gregory L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 35.5 Sophomore 2 6.5 B 15 48.4 Junior 11 35.5 C 3 9.7 Senior 17 54.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 6.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 45.2 Required by my major 18 60.0 3 hours 11 35.5 Other (e.g. elective) 12 40.0 4 - 5 hours 2 6.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 3.1 56.3 40.6 3.4 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 12.5 28.1 59.4 3.5 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 3.1 40.6 56.3 3.5 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 9.4 34.4 56.3 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 3.2 0.0 48.4 48.4 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 3.1 3.1 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 3.1 59.4 37.5 3.3 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 3.1 9.4 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 6.3 9.4 50.0 34.4 3.1 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 6.7 20.0 73.3 3.7 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 68.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 685 401S1 PROSEM PUB ADMIN & POLIC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hager, Gregory L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 70.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 29.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 94.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 16 84.2 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 5 26.3 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 101 001L1 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Pennie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 50.0 A 3 30.0 Sophomore 3 30.0 B 6 60.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 1 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 5 50.0 2 hours 5 50.0 Required by my major 3 30.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 16.7 25.0 41.7 16.7 2.6 1.00 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 1.11 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 16.7 16.7 41.7 25.0 2.8 1.06 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 25.0 16.7 41.7 16.7 2.5 1.09 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 16.7 8.3 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.97 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 25.0 25.0 33.3 16.7 2.4 1.08 14. Encouraged class participation 12 8.3 16.7 41.7 33.3 3.0 0.95 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 33.3 41.7 25.0 2.9 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 41.7 41.7 16.7 2.8 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 16.7 25.0 41.7 16.7 2.6 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 101 002L1 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Pennie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 50.0 A 1 7.7 Sophomore 5 35.7 B 6 46.2 Junior 2 14.3 C 6 46.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 8 57.1 2 hours 7 50.0 Required by my major 3 21.4 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 21.4 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 3.0 0.38 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 33.3 53.3 13.3 2.8 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 33.3 53.3 13.3 2.8 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 13.3 33.3 46.7 6.7 2.5 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 20.0 73.3 6.7 2.9 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 13.3 26.7 53.3 6.7 2.5 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 33.3 53.3 6.7 2.6 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 28.6 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 33.3 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 101 003L1 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Pennie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 36.4 A 2 18.2 Sophomore 6 54.5 B 6 54.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 18.2 Senior 1 9.1 D 1 9.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 4 36.4 2 hours 4 36.4 Required by my major 4 36.4 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 27.3 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 9.1 0.0 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 27.3 36.4 27.3 2.8 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 9.1 9.1 36.4 45.5 3.2 0.98 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 27.3 36.4 27.3 2.8 0.98 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 10.0 0.0 80.0 10.0 2.9 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 0.0 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 52.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with