****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 017L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 50.0 A 11 61.1 Sophomore 4 22.2 B 7 38.9 Junior 3 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 50.0 Studies Program 10 55.6 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 5 27.8 3 hours 1 5.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 16.7 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 0.0 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 3.7 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 14.3 35.7 42.9 3.1 0.95 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 5.0 45.0 45.0 3.3 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 5.0 0.0 35.0 60.0 3.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 022L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 54.5 A 4 36.4 Sophomore 5 45.5 B 6 54.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 9.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 72.7 Studies Program 6 54.5 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 5 45.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 023L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 16 80.0 A 9 45.0 Sophomore 2 10.0 B 10 50.0 Junior 2 10.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 30.0 Studies Program 10 55.6 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 7 38.9 3 hours 6 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 0.0 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 9.1 31.8 59.1 3.5 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 10.0 45.0 40.0 3.2 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 4.5 22.7 72.7 3.7 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 9.5 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 95.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 024L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 52.4 A 13 61.9 Sophomore 7 33.3 B 5 23.8 Junior 3 14.3 C 2 9.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 4.8 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 28.6 Studies Program 14 70.0 2 hours 4 19.0 Required by my major 4 20.0 3 hours 8 38.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 533 002L1 ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 48.6 Sophomore 10 27.8 B 15 40.5 Junior 14 38.9 C 2 5.4 Senior 9 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 5.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 37.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 24.3 Required by my major 20 54.1 3 hours 10 27.0 Other (e.g. elective) 17 45.9 4 - 5 hours 3 8.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 0.0 5.4 51.4 43.2 3.4 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 0.0 2.6 42.1 55.3 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 0.0 2.6 36.8 60.5 3.6 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 2.6 0.0 31.6 65.8 3.6 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 0.0 2.6 42.1 55.3 3.5 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 2.6 23.7 73.7 3.7 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 38 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 2.6 2.6 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 3.2 71.0 22.6 3.1 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 0.0 40.5 59.5 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 5.4 40.5 54.1 3.5 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 0.0 2.6 34.2 63.2 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 51 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 73.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 456 001L1 BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 32.1 Sophomore 1 3.6 B 15 53.6 Junior 11 39.3 C 4 14.3 Senior 16 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 21.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 28.6 Required by my major 17 60.7 3 hours 7 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 39.3 4 - 5 hours 7 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 3.4 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 3.2 35.5 61.3 3.6 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 3.2 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 14.8 44.4 40.7 3.3 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 10.0 43.3 43.3 3.3 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 3.2 35.5 61.3 3.6 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 66.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 457 001A1 BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE LABORATORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 50.0 Junior 3 37.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 12.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 7 87.5 3 hours 4 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 457 002A1 BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE LABORATORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 4 40.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 8 80.0 3 hours 5 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 565 001L1 ADV TOPICS NEUROSCIENCE: DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barron, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 33.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 33.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 627 001S1 PROSEM PHYSIOLOG PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barron, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 71.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 4 57.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 85.7 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 535 001L1 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 62.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 31.3 Junior 7 43.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 6.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 6.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 12.5 Required by my major 3 18.8 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 13 81.3 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 2 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 76.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 001L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 36.1 A 25 41.0 Sophomore 19 31.1 B 30 49.2 Junior 13 21.3 C 6 9.8 Senior 6 9.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 28 45.9 Studies Program 10 16.9 2 hours 15 24.6 Required by my major 29 49.2 3 hours 12 19.7 Other (e.g. elective) 20 33.9 4 - 5 hours 6 9.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 66 0.0 0.0 60.6 39.4 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 65 3.1 4.6 64.6 27.7 3.2 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 52 1.9 3.8 69.2 25.0 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 66 0.0 1.5 45.5 53.0 3.5 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 65 0.0 0.0 49.2 50.8 3.5 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 45 2.2 2.2 42.2 53.3 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 63 0.0 1.6 57.1 41.3 3.4 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 9.4 25.0 34.4 31.3 2.9 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 66 0.0 3.0 56.1 40.9 3.4 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 66 0.0 1.5 37.9 60.6 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 59 0.0 0.0 62.7 37.3 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 66 0.0 3.0 51.5 45.5 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 66 3.0 9.1 45.5 42.4 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 66 0.0 3.0 54.5 42.4 3.4 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 61 1.6 8.2 67.2 23.0 3.1 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 63 0.0 7.9 66.7 25.4 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 57 0.0 12.3 61.4 26.3 3.1 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 64 1.6 1.6 56.3 40.6 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 62 4.8 19.4 46.8 29.0 3.0 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 66 0.0 6.1 54.5 39.4 3.3 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 65 0.0 6.2 46.2 47.7 3.4 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 105 Number of forms scanned = 102 Number of forms with at least one student response = 66 Percent completed = 62.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 401L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 12.0 A 11 42.3 Sophomore 3 12.0 B 11 42.3 Junior 8 32.0 C 4 15.4 Senior 10 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 48.0 Studies Program 3 12.0 2 hours 9 36.0 Required by my major 13 52.0 3 hours 3 12.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 36.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 11.5 65.4 19.2 3.0 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 11.5 34.6 53.8 3.4 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 3.7 14.8 55.6 25.9 3.0 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 27 3.7 11.1 44.4 40.7 3.2 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 16.0 60.0 24.0 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 11.5 61.5 26.9 3.2 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 18.2 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 11.5 23.1 42.3 23.1 2.8 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 3.7 7.4 59.3 29.6 3.1 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 73.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Unknown faculty type COURSE = PSY 100 022A2 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Calhoun, Kevin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 66.7 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 2 13.3 B 4 26.7 Junior 1 6.7 C 3 20.0 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 6.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 46.7 Studies Program 8 53.3 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 4 26.7 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 20.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 13.3 26.7 60.0 3.5 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 33. Amount of work appropriate 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 34. Instructor explained expectations 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 35. Instructor helped with my problems 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 003L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 50 40.7 A 49 39.8 Sophomore 42 34.1 B 64 52.0 Junior 24 19.5 C 10 8.1 Senior 6 4.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 24 19.5 Studies Program 12 9.9 2 hours 53 43.1 Required by my major 70 57.9 3 hours 35 28.5 Other (e.g. elective) 39 32.2 4 - 5 hours 7 5.7 6 - 7 hours 4 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 127 0.0 0.0 28.3 71.7 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 126 0.8 2.4 28.6 68.3 3.6 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 118 0.8 3.4 37.3 58.5 3.5 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 127 0.8 7.1 34.6 57.5 3.5 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 127 0.0 2.4 31.5 66.1 3.6 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 114 0.0 1.8 37.7 60.5 3.6 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 125 0.0 1.6 32.0 66.4 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 67 0.0 38.8 17.9 43.3 3.0 0.91 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 127 0.0 1.6 15.7 82.7 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 127 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 120 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 126 0.0 0.0 11.9 88.1 3.9 0.33 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 127 0.0 0.0 22.8 77.2 3.8 0.42 14. Encouraged class participation 127 0.0 0.0 18.9 81.1 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 124 0.0 0.8 41.9 57.3 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 123 0.0 4.1 39.8 56.1 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 118 0.0 3.4 44.9 51.7 3.5 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 126 0.0 0.8 30.2 69.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 125 1.6 5.6 37.6 55.2 3.5 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 126 0.0 2.4 19.8 77.8 3.8 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 126 0.0 0.8 12.7 86.5 3.9 0.37. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.76 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 173 Number of forms scanned = 140 Number of forms with at least one student response = 128 Percent completed = 74.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 302 401L1 PSYCHOLOGY IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 51.3 Sophomore 2 5.4 B 12 30.8 Junior 11 29.7 C 5 12.8 Senior 24 64.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 5.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 43.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 30.8 Required by my major 12 30.8 3 hours 8 20.5 Other (e.g. elective) 27 69.2 4 - 5 hours 1 2.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 0.0 41.5 58.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 4.9 2.4 53.7 39.0 3.3 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 2.4 46.3 51.2 3.5 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 2.4 7.3 43.9 46.3 3.3 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 4.9 0.0 39.0 56.1 3.5 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 2.4 41.5 56.1 3.5 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 0.0 34.1 65.9 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 41 2.4 0.0 41.5 56.1 3.5 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 0.0 4.9 36.6 58.5 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 19.5 80.5 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 2.6 36.8 60.5 3.6 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 0.0 34.1 65.9 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 0.0 4.9 39.0 56.1 3.5 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 0.0 0.0 48.7 51.3 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 5.1 46.2 48.7 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 2.4 46.3 51.2 3.5 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 0.0 30.0 27.5 42.5 3.1 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 2.5 45.0 52.5 3.5 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 0.0 2.5 25.0 72.5 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 65 Number of forms scanned = 64 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 63.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 424 001L1 HUMAN SENSES & PERCEPTN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 50.0 Sophomore 1 4.2 B 8 33.3 Junior 3 12.5 C 4 16.7 Senior 19 79.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 45.8 Required by my major 13 54.2 3 hours 6 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 45.8 4 - 5 hours 3 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 17.4 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 4.3 17.4 78.3 3.7 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 444 401L1 SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crawford, Anne M. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 42.9 Junior 7 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 21 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 39.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 50.0 Required by my major 15 53.6 3 hours 3 10.7 Other (e.g. elective) 13 46.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 10.3 3.4 58.6 27.6 3.0 0.87 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 3.4 6.9 55.2 34.5 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 6.9 62.1 27.6 3.1 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 6.9 13.8 48.3 31.0 3.0 0.87 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 0.0 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 10.3 20.7 41.4 27.6 2.9 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 3.4 3.4 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.73 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 18.2 50.0 31.8 3.1 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 6.9 3.4 51.7 37.9 3.2 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 17.2 17.2 37.9 27.6 2.8 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 3.4 41.4 51.7 3.4 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 7.1 3.6 50.0 39.3 3.2 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 3.4 10.3 48.3 37.9 3.2 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 4.0 20.0 48.0 28.0 3.0 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 6.9 0.0 58.6 34.5 3.2 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 10.3 13.8 44.8 31.0 3.0 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 7.1 14.3 46.4 32.1 3.0 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 10.7 25.0 32.1 32.1 2.9 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 74.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 195 004L1 ORIENTATION TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 15.8 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 10 52.6 B 0 0.0 Junior 5 26.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 19 100.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 94.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 5.3 Required by my major 18 94.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % %