****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 350 401L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: JURY RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 59.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 21.9 Junior 12 37.5 C 2 6.3 Senior 19 59.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.1 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 4 12.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 65.6 Studies Program 1 3.1 2 hours 7 21.9 Required by my major 8 25.0 3 hours 2 6.3 Other (e.g. elective) 23 71.9 4 - 5 hours 2 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 12.5 53.1 34.4 3.2 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 0.0 9.1 48.5 42.4 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 10.7 60.7 28.6 3.2 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 3.1 15.6 53.1 28.1 3.1 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 3.3 0.0 60.0 36.7 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 3.2 9.7 54.8 32.3 3.2 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 6.9 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 3.1 3.1 46.9 46.9 3.4 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 7.1 39.3 53.6 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 3.1 9.4 46.9 40.6 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 16.1 54.8 29.0 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 15.4 57.7 26.9 3.1 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 12.5 59.4 28.1 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 19.2 53.8 26.9 3.1 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 3.1 65.6 31.3 3.3 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 3.2 19.4 51.6 25.8 3.0 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 6.3 3.1 56.3 34.4 3.2 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 6.7 6.7 50.0 36.7 3.2 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 418 401L1 SOCIAL CHANGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 58.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 33.3 Junior 11 45.8 C 1 4.2 Senior 12 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.2 Pass or Audit 1 4.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 83.3 Studies Program 1 4.2 2 hours 1 4.2 Required by my major 4 16.7 3 hours 1 4.2 Other (e.g. elective) 19 79.2 4 - 5 hours 1 4.2 6 - 7 hours 1 4.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 5.6 61.1 27.8 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 16.7 0.0 58.3 25.0 2.9 0.97 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 3.7 7.4 59.3 29.6 3.1 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 8.7 65.2 21.7 3.0 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 7.7 65.4 26.9 3.2 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 4.2 25.0 50.0 20.8 2.9 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 7.4 22.2 40.7 29.6 2.9 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 3.7 3.7 33.3 59.3 3.5 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 23 4.3 0.0 52.2 43.5 3.3 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 7.4 7.4 55.6 29.6 3.1 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 7.7 23.1 38.5 30.8 2.9 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 27 11.1 7.4 44.4 37.0 3.1 0.96 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 21.7 56.5 21.7 3.0 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 26.1 43.5 26.1 2.9 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 7.4 25.9 40.7 25.9 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 11.1 22.2 33.3 33.3 2.9 1.01 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 7.4 18.5 40.7 33.3 3.0 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 64.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 635 001S1 SEMINAR IN SOCIAL INEQUALITIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bacchetta, Paola ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 751 401S1 SEMINAR IN SOC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Billings, Dwight B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 100.0 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 25.0 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 3 37.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 420 001L1 COMMUNITY ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bridger, Jeff ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 1 14.3 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 42.9 Required by my major 6 85.7 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 53.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 260 001L1 POPULAT, RESOURC & CHNGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garkovich, Lorraine E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.1 A 28 63.6 Sophomore 17 36.2 B 16 36.4 Junior 20 42.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 19.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 44.7 Studies Program 15 31.9 2 hours 17 36.2 Required by my major 28 59.6 3 hours 7 14.9 Other (e.g. elective) 4 8.5 4 - 5 hours 1 2.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 48 2.1 4.2 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 11.9 19.0 35.7 33.3 2.9 1.01 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 48 4.2 4.2 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 48 2.1 0.0 45.8 52.1 3.5 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 2.1 4.2 39.6 54.2 3.5 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 48 2.1 2.1 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 2.1 4.2 54.2 39.6 3.3 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 48 2.1 4.2 52.1 41.7 3.3 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 48 2.1 14.6 37.5 45.8 3.3 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 48 2.1 0.0 22.9 75.0 3.7 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 40 2.5 0.0 50.0 47.5 3.4 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 48 2.1 0.0 39.6 58.3 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 6.3 6.3 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 47 4.3 4.3 44.7 46.8 3.3 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 47 2.1 2.1 48.9 46.8 3.4 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 46 2.2 6.5 45.7 45.7 3.3 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 46 2.2 13.0 52.2 32.6 3.2 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 4.2 0.0 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 48 10.4 20.8 43.8 25.0 2.8 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 48 2.1 8.3 50.0 39.6 3.3 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 48 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 38 2.6 13.2 63.2 21.1 3.0 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 44 2.3 2.3 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 44 2.3 9.1 52.3 36.4 3.2 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 26 3.8 11.5 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.77 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 28 3.6 7.1 57.1 32.1 3.2 0.72 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 69 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 48 Percent completed = 69.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 005L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 24 60.0 A 15 37.5 Sophomore 6 15.0 B 17 42.5 Junior 6 15.0 C 7 17.5 Senior 4 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 29 72.5 Studies Program 27 67.5 2 hours 7 17.5 Required by my major 6 15.0 3 hours 3 7.5 Other (e.g. elective) 7 17.5 4 - 5 hours 1 2.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 0.0 2.4 59.5 38.1 3.4 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 12.2 26.8 43.9 17.1 2.7 0.91 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 7.5 17.5 57.5 17.5 2.9 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 2.4 9.5 57.1 31.0 3.2 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 4.8 64.3 31.0 3.3 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 0.0 7.5 57.5 35.0 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 3.0 9.1 63.6 24.2 3.1 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 0.0 9.5 50.0 40.5 3.3 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 42 0.0 4.8 40.5 54.8 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 41 4.9 9.8 48.8 36.6 3.2 0.80 12. Satisfact answered class questions 42 0.0 7.1 40.5 52.4 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 2.4 16.7 35.7 45.2 3.2 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 42 0.0 2.4 40.5 57.1 3.5 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 2.4 59.5 38.1 3.4 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 2.5 5.0 60.0 32.5 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 10.8 62.2 27.0 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 4.9 17.1 51.2 26.8 3.0 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 4.8 9.5 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 4.8 4.8 42.9 47.6 3.3 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 12.5 12.5 12.5 62.5 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 54 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 641 001S1 GENDER ISSUES DEVELOPMNT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 83.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 16.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 54.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 603 001L1 SEM IN TEACHING SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 83.3 3 hours 4 66.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 302 401L1 SOCIO RESEARCH METHS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 5.9 Sophomore 3 18.8 B 9 52.9 Junior 5 31.3 C 7 41.2 Senior 7 43.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 6.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 17.6 Studies Program 1 6.3 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 7 43.8 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 8 50.0 4 - 5 hours 5 29.4 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 26.3 47.4 21.1 2.8 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 10.5 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 36.8 47.4 15.8 2.8 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 47.1 35.3 11.8 2.5 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 21.1 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 15.8 42.1 36.8 3.1 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 82.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.0 A 9 18.4 Sophomore 1 2.0 B 32 65.3 Junior 11 22.0 C 4 8.2 Senior 36 72.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.0 Pass or Audit 4 8.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 34 68.0 Studies Program 18 36.7 2 hours 10 20.0 Required by my major 11 22.4 3 hours 2 4.0 Other (e.g. elective) 20 40.8 4 - 5 hours 4 8.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 0.0 1.9 67.3 30.8 3.3 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 51 3.9 27.5 56.9 11.8 2.8 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 51 2.0 13.7 68.6 15.7 3.0 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 3.8 19.2 63.5 13.5 2.9 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 51 5.9 11.8 60.8 21.6 3.0 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 52 0.0 13.5 53.8 32.7 3.2 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 52 1.9 7.7 63.5 26.9 3.2 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 50 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 9.6 21.2 48.1 21.2 2.8 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 42 0.0 2.4 64.3 33.3 3.3 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 0.0 1.9 69.2 28.8 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 52 11.5 46.2 28.8 13.5 2.4 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 52 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 2.2 15.2 73.9 8.7 2.9 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 49 2.0 32.7 55.1 10.2 2.7 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 47 2.1 42.6 46.8 8.5 2.6 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 49 0.0 14.3 75.5 10.2 3.0 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 49 14.3 51.0 30.6 4.1 2.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 51 11.8 35.3 41.2 11.8 2.5 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 51 9.8 19.6 49.0 21.6 2.8 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 32 9.4 28.1 59.4 3.1 2.6 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 41 0.0 17.1 68.3 14.6 3.0 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 41 0.0 9.8 80.5 9.8 3.0 0.45 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 0.0 44.4 50.0 5.6 2.6 0.61 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 24 0.0 25.0 54.2 20.8 3.0 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 76 Number of forms scanned = 52 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 68.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 350 402L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: DISABILITY AND SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Huff, Marlene ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 73.7 Sophomore 2 10.5 B 3 15.8 Junior 9 47.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 42.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 10.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 26.3 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 3 15.8 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 15 78.9 4 - 5 hours 4 21.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 23.8 71.4 3.7 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 0.0 26.7 66.7 3.5 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 19.0 14.3 66.7 3.5 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 23.8 71.4 3.7 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 58.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 436 001L1 SOC OF DEVIANT BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 41.9 Sophomore 3 4.8 B 33 53.2 Junior 30 48.4 C 3 4.8 Senior 28 45.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 33.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 22 35.5 Required by my major 12 19.4 3 hours 14 22.6 Other (e.g. elective) 50 80.6 4 - 5 hours 3 4.8 6 - 7 hours 2 3.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 67 0.0 0.0 41.8 58.2 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 67 0.0 1.5 50.7 47.8 3.5 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 63 0.0 0.0 58.7 41.3 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 66 0.0 1.5 37.9 60.6 3.6 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 67 1.5 0.0 38.8 59.7 3.6 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 56 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 67 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 41 12.2 14.6 41.5 31.7 2.9 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 67 0.0 3.0 44.8 52.2 3.5 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 67 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 61 0.0 1.6 47.5 50.8 3.5 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 0.0 0.0 41.8 58.2 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 67 0.0 11.9 44.8 43.3 3.3 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 67 1.5 13.4 52.2 32.8 3.2 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 66 1.5 1.5 51.5 45.5 3.4 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 62 1.6 1.6 59.7 37.1 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 57 3.5 8.8 52.6 35.1 3.2 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 67 0.0 0.0 49.3 50.7 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 66 1.5 10.6 54.5 33.3 3.2 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 67 0.0 3.0 55.2 41.8 3.4 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 66 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 137 Number of forms scanned = 68 Number of forms with at least one student response = 67 Percent completed = 48.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 680 001L1 METHS SOCIAL INVESTIGATN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 62.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 87.5 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 22.2 11.1 33.3 33.3 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 33.3 11.1 33.3 22.2 2.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 33.3 11.1 22.2 33.3 2.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 22.2 44.4 22.2 11.1 2.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 11.1 11.1 66.7 11.1 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 12.5 37.5 25.0 25.0 2.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 11.1 22.2 33.3 33.3 2.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 22.2 66.7 0.0 11.1 2.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 33.3 11.1 44.4 11.1 2.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 33.3 11.1 33.3 22.2 2.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 11.1 33.3 44.4 11.1 2.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 22.2 22.2 33.3 22.2 2.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 11.1 33.3 33.3 22.2 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 12.5 50.0 25.0 12.5 2.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 25.0 50.0 12.5 12.5 2.1 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 009L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 44.1 A 15 44.1 Sophomore 10 29.4 B 15 44.1 Junior 6 17.6 C 4 11.8 Senior 3 8.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 58.8 Studies Program 28 82.4 2 hours 8 23.5 Required by my major 1 2.9 3 hours 5 14.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 14.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 5.7 57.1 37.1 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 5.9 67.6 26.5 3.2 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 2.9 57.1 40.0 3.4 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 8.8 50.0 41.2 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 36.0 36.0 28.0 2.9 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 2.9 11.4 51.4 34.3 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 2.9 0.0 57.1 40.0 3.3 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 28 3.6 3.6 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 2.9 0.0 54.3 42.9 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 5.7 51.4 42.9 3.4 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 65.6 31.3 3.3 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 9.4 68.8 21.9 3.1 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 10.7 67.9 21.4 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 2.9 29.4 55.9 11.8 2.8 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 14.7 58.8 26.5 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 2.9 8.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 6.3 12.5 62.5 18.8 2.9 0.77 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 5.3 10.5 78.9 5.3 2.8 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 26.7 66.7 6.7 2.8 0.56 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 71 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 49.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 152 002L1 MODERN SOCIAL PROBLEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 28.6 A 13 48.1 Sophomore 9 32.1 B 8 29.6 Junior 7 25.0 C 6 22.2 Senior 4 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 51.9 Studies Program 11 39.3 2 hours 8 29.6 Required by my major 8 28.6 3 hours 4 14.8 Other (e.g. elective) 9 32.1 4 - 5 hours 1 3.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 2.9 58.8 38.2 3.4 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 0.0 8.8 47.1 44.1 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 3.1 9.4 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 2.9 14.7 50.0 32.4 3.1 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 2.9 0.0 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 3.1 12.5 50.0 34.4 3.2 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 8.8 58.8 32.4 3.2 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 3.6 42.9 35.7 17.9 2.7 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 11.8 38.2 26.5 23.5 2.6 0.99 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 6.1 6.1 48.5 39.4 3.2 0.82 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 2.9 11.8 55.9 29.4 3.1 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 21.2 30.3 30.3 18.2 2.5 1.03 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 12.5 71.9 15.6 3.0 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 3.0 24.2 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 3.4 34.5 44.8 17.2 2.8 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 2.9 11.8 61.8 23.5 3.1 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 9.7 41.9 29.0 19.4 2.6 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 8.8 32.4 38.2 20.6 2.7 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 26.5 20.6 20.6 32.4 2.6 1.21. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 27.3 36.4 27.3 2.8 0.98 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 73 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 46.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 152 401L1 MODERN SOCIAL PROBLEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 7.7 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 7 53.8 B 7 50.0 Junior 1 7.7 C 1 7.1 Senior 4 30.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 64.3 Studies Program 6 54.5 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 36.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 60.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 013L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leedham, Cynthia A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 75.0 A 6 37.5 Sophomore 3 18.8 B 8 50.0 Junior 1 6.3 C 2 12.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 10 62.5 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 2 12.5 3 hours 6 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 4 25.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 37.5 31.3 31.3 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 64.