****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 324 001L1 CONTEMP LATIN AM CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 20.0 Sophomore 2 10.0 B 11 55.0 Junior 7 35.0 C 5 25.0 Senior 11 55.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 8 40.0 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 7 35.0 3 hours 3 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 25.0 4 - 5 hours 5 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 5.0 10.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 15.0 65.0 20.0 3.1 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 95.0 5.0 3.1 0.22 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 15.0 35.0 40.0 10.0 2.5 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 6.3 0.0 81.3 12.5 3.0 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 10.0 20.0 55.0 15.0 2.8 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 60.0 30.0 10.0 2.5 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 10.5 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 20.0 70.0 0.0 2.6 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 25.0 70.0 0.0 2.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 10.0 35.0 50.0 5.0 2.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 74.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 429 001L1 SURVEY OF MEDICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 55.6 Junior 2 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 22.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 11.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 3 33.3 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 6 66.7 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 2 22.2 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 322 001L1 AZTEC/MAYA CIVILIZATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Begley, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 6 31.6 B 10 52.6 Junior 1 5.3 C 2 10.5 Senior 12 63.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 21.1 Studies Program 8 42.1 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 4 21.1 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 36.8 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 21.1 26.3 47.4 3.2 0.96 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 17.6 58.8 23.5 3.1 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 21.1 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 38.5 23.1 38.5 3.0 0.91 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 33.3 27.8 38.9 3.1 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 26.3 31.6 42.1 3.2 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 65.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 010L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 9.5 A 8 36.4 Sophomore 12 57.1 B 10 45.5 Junior 6 28.6 C 4 18.2 Senior 1 4.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 40.9 Studies Program 19 90.5 2 hours 9 40.9 Required by my major 2 9.5 3 hours 4 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 8.7 78.3 13.0 3.0 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 4.5 86.4 9.1 3.0 0.38 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 13.0 82.6 4.3 2.9 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 8.7 47.8 43.5 0.0 2.3 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 39.1 56.5 0.0 2.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 87.0 8.7 3.0 0.37 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 78.3 17.4 3.1 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 9.1 63.6 27.3 0.0 2.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 8.7 52.2 39.1 0.0 2.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 4.3 8.7 73.9 13.0 3.0 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 27.3 59.1 13.6 2.9 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 13.0 60.9 26.1 0.0 2.1 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 13.0 73.9 8.7 2.9 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 4.3 78.3 17.4 3.1 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 72.2 27.8 0.0 2.3 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 13.6 81.8 4.5 2.9 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 21.7 52.2 21.7 4.3 2.1 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 8.7 60.9 26.1 4.3 2.3 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 21.7 43.5 34.8 0.0 2.1 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 5.9 29.4 64.7 0.0 2.6 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 0.32 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 85.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 011L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 17.6 A 6 37.5 Sophomore 6 35.3 B 8 50.0 Junior 7 41.2 C 2 12.5 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.8 Studies Program 15 88.2 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 1 5.9 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 4.8 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 81.0 14.3 3.1 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 23.8 28.6 38.1 9.5 2.3 0.97 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 19.0 28.6 42.9 9.5 2.4 0.93 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 11.1 38.9 38.9 11.1 2.5 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 14.3 28.6 52.4 4.8 2.5 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 94.1 5.9 3.1 0.24 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 26.3 21.1 31.6 21.1 2.5 1.12 14. Encouraged class participation 21 4.8 14.3 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 45.0 35.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 50.0 45.0 5.0 2.6 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 9.5 23.8 57.1 9.5 2.7 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 38.1 33.3 28.6 2.9 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 19.0 33.3 42.9 4.8 2.3 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 45.5 36.4 9.1 2.5 0.82 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 6.3 18.8 75.0 0.0 2.7 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 84.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 013L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 41.7 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 3 25.0 B 7 58.3 Junior 2 16.7 C 1 8.3 Senior 2 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 10 90.9 2 hours 5 41.7 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 7.7 30.8 53.8 7.7 2.6 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 23.1 69.2 0.0 2.6 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 8.3 50.0 33.3 8.3 2.4 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 2.8 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 30.8 61.5 7.7 2.8 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 54.5 36.4 9.1 2.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 15.4 38.5 30.8 15.4 2.5 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 7.7 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 30.8 30.8 38.5 3.1 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 59.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 014L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 11.1 A 5 29.4 Sophomore 6 33.3 B 7 41.2 Junior 7 38.9 C 5 29.4 Senior 3 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 16 94.1 2 hours 8 47.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 5.0 20.0 75.0 0.0 2.7 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 31.6 63.2 0.0 2.6 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 10.0 15.0 70.0 5.0 2.7 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 30.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 2.0 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 20.0 50.0 30.0 0.0 2.1 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 15.0 15.0 70.0 0.0 2.6 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 5.0 20.0 75.0 0.0 2.7 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 21.1 42.1 36.8 0.0 2.2 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 30.0 30.0 40.0 0.0 2.1 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 10.0 15.0 60.0 15.0 2.8 0.83 11. Was available for consultation 16 6.3 37.5 50.0 6.3 2.6 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 15.0 35.0 50.0 0.0 2.4 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 31.6 47.4 15.8 5.3 1.9 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 20 10.0 20.0 65.0 5.0 2.7 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 5.6 22.2 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 21.1 42.1 31.6 5.3 2.2 0.85 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 16.7 44.4 38.9 0.0 2.2 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 10.0 20.0 70.0 0.0 2.6 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 30.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 2.0 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 30.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 2.1 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 35.0 25.0 40.0 0.0 2.1 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 15.4 53.8 30.8 0.0 2.2 0.69 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 12.5 43.8 43.8 0.0 2.3 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 015L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 9.5 A 7 31.8 Sophomore 12 57.1 B 11 50.0 Junior 6 28.6 C 4 18.2 Senior 1 4.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 18.2 Studies Program 21 95.5 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 9 40.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.5 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 8.0 80.0 12.0 3.0 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 4.0 20.0 60.0 16.0 2.9 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 88.0 8.0 3.0 0.35 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 20.0 32.0 40.0 8.0 2.4 0.91 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 8.3 33.3 50.0 8.3 2.6 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 8.0 76.0 16.0 3.1 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 4.0 4.0 72.0 20.0 3.1 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 9.1 45.5 40.9 4.5 2.4 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 25.0 29.2 41.7 4.2 2.3 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 13.6 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 8.0 44.0 40.0 8.0 2.5 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 24.0 36.0 32.0 8.0 2.2 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 23 8.7 17.4 56.5 17.4 2.8 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 84.0 8.0 3.0 0.41 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 37.5 58.3 4.2 2.7 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 54.5 45.5 0.0 2.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 4.0 12.0 72.0 12.0 2.9 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 25.0 41.7 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 16.0 36.0 44.0 4.0 2.4 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 40.0 24.0 24.0 12.0 2.1 1.08. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 6.3 43.8 50.0 0.0 2.4 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 22 4.5 27.3 68.2 0.0 2.6 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 22 4.5 22.7 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 24 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 96.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 016L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 22.7 A 7 33.3 Sophomore 6 27.3 B 12 57.1 Junior 8 36.4 C 2 9.5 Senior 3 13.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 18.2 Studies Program 20 90.9 2 hours 10 45.5 Required by my major 2 9.1 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 4.3 73.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 8.7 43.5 34.8 13.0 2.5 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 34.8 47.8 17.4 2.8 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 82.6 17.4 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 45.0 35.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 52.2 30.4 17.4 2.7 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 4.3 17.4 60.9 17.4 2.9 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 8.7 52.2 26.1 13.0 2.4 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 8.7 73.9 17.4 3.1 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 77.3 18.2 3.1 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 42.9 47.6 9.5 2.7 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 60.0 25.0 15.0 2.6 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 86.4 9.1 3.0 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 17.4 43.5 26.1 13.0 2.3 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 43.5 43.5 8.7 2.6 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 13.0 43.5 34.8 8.7 2.4 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 10.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 2.4 0.84 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 26.3 68.4 5.3 2.8 0.54 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 017L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 47.1 A 5 29.4 Sophomore 7 41.2 B 7 41.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 17.6 Senior 2 11.8 D 2 11.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 17 100.0 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 3.2 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 5.9 76.5 11.8 2.9 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 23.5 41.2 35.3 0.0 2.1 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 11.8 47.1 41.2 0.0 2.3 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 11.8 5.9 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.86 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 5.9 0.0 70.6 23.5 3.1 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 21.4 42.9 35.7 0.0 2.1 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 17.6 23.5 52.9 5.9 2.5 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 5.9 0.0 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 11.8 11.8 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 17.6 35.3 41.2 5.9 2.4 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 17 11.8 5.9 70.6 11.8 2.8 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 5.9 5.9 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 11.8 23.5 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 42.9 42.9 7.1 2.5 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 11.8 11.8 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.93 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 29.4 23.5 41.2 5.9 2.2 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 52.9 23.5 17.6 2.5 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 17.6 47.1 29.4 5.9 2.2 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 14.3 7.1 64.3 14.3 2.8 0.89 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 7.1 21.4 64.3 7.1 2.7 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 7.1 7.1 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.83 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 81.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 661 001L1 ETHNOGRAPHIC DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 3 60.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 230 001L1 INTRO TO PHYSICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 8.0 A 6 24.0 Sophomore 4 16.0 B 8 32.0 Junior 12 48.0 C 9 36.0 Senior 7 28.0 D 2 8.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 20.0 Required by my major 22 91.7 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.3 4 - 5 hours 9 36.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 3.4 0.0 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 17.2 51.7 31.0 3.1 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 3.4 65.5 31.0 3.3 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 20.7 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 20.7 58.6 20.7 3.0 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 6.9 72.4 20.7 3.1 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 20.7 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 3.4 17.2 48.3 31.0 3.1 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 44.8 55.2 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 13.8 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 6.9 27.6 37.9 27.6 2.9 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 20.7 51.7 24.1 3.0 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 7.1 75.0 17.9 3.1 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 3.7 11.1 74.1 11.1 2.9 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 7.1 67.9 25.0 3.2 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 7.1 28.6 46.4 17.9 2.8 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 6.9 13.8 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 27.6 37.9 31.0 3.0 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 93.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 603 001S1 HUMAN BIO IN CONTEXT OF SOCIOCULTURAL CHANGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 16.7 6 - 7 hours 7 58.3 8 or more hours 2 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 15.4 15.4 69.2 3.5 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 29. Students free to express opinions 13 7.7 7.7 23.1 61.5 3.4 0.96 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 320 001L1 ANDEAN CIVILIZATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillehay, Tom D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 50.0 Sophomore 2 11.1 B 7 38.9 Junior 6 33.3 C 2 11.1 Senior 8 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 11.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 27.8 Studies Program 5 27.8 2 hours 3 16.7 Required by my major 5 27.8 3 hours 5 27.8 Other (e.g. elective) 8 44.4 4 - 5 hours 4 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 4.8 4.8 61.9 28.6 3.1 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 9.5 14.3 38.1 38.1 3.0 0.97 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 19.0 38.1 42.9 3.2 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 14.3 42.9 38.1 3.1 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 9.5 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 21 4.8 19.0 42.9 33.3 3.0 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 43.8 31.3 25.0 2.8 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 19.0 42.9 33.3 3.0 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 4.8 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 67.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 651 001L1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillehay, Tom D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 62.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 25.0 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 4 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 003L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 15.8 A 8 42.1 Sophomore 7 36.8 B 9 47.4 Junior 7 36.8 C 2 10.5 Senior 2 10.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 57.9 Studies Program 16 84.2 2 hours 2 10.5 Required by my major 1 5.3 3 hours 2 10.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.5 4 - 5 hours 4 21.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 18.2 45.5 31.8 3.0 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 13.6 45.5 40.9 3.3 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 9.1 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 4.5 31.8 63.6 3.6 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 9.1 18.2 22.7 50.0 3.1 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 20 10.0 50.0 25.0 15.0 2.5 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 5.3 42.1 47.4 3.3 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 4.8 28.6 47.6 19.0 2.8 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 47.4 31.6 15.8 2.6 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 22.7 27.3 36.4 2.9 1.08 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 9.1 9.1 31.8 50.0 3.2 0.97 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 4.5 9.1 36.4 50.0 3.3 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 7.1 28.6 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.95 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 004L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 7 50.0 B 6 42.9 Junior 3 21.4 C 1 7.1 Senior 4 28.6 D 1 7.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 64.3 Studies Program 11 78.6 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 1 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 14.3 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 31.3 50.0 18.8 2.9 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 33.3 40.0 26.7 2.9 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 12.5 12.5 68.8 6.3 2.7 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 20.0 73.3 6.7 2.9 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 21.4 14.3 50.0 14.3 2.6 1.02 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 005L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 16.7 A 4 21.1 Sophomore 7 38.9 B 8 42.1 Junior 6 33.3 C 6 31.6 Senior 2 11.1 D 1 5.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 21.1 Studies Program 14 73.7 2 hours 7 36.8 Required by my major 3 15.8 3 hours 7 36.8 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.5 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 4.3 17.4 47.8 30.4 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 5.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 12.5 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 22 9.1 18.2 59.1 13.6 2.8 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 12.5 58.3 29.2 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 12.5 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 8.3 29.2 45.8 16.7 2.7 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 8.7 13.0 39.1 39.1 3.1 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 4.5 22.7 40.9 31.8 3.0 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 006L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 16.7 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 4 66.7 B 5 83.3 Junior 1 16.7 C 1 16.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 50.0 Studies Program 4 66.7 2 hours 2 33.3 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 16.7 50.0 16.7 16.7 2.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 29.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 007L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 12.5 A 6 37.5 Sophomore 6 37.5 B 9 56.3 Junior 4 25.0 C 1 6.3 Senior 4 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 25.0 Studies Program 12 75.0 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 3 18.8 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 11.8 17.6 47.1 23.5 2.8 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 5.6 0.0 50.0 44.4 3.3 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 31.3 37.5 31.3 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 5.6 38.9 50.0 3.3 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 11.1 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 2.8 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 0.0 58.8 35.3 3.2 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 29.4 35.3 29.4 2.9 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 5.6 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 0.0 50.0 44.4 3.3 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 0.0 66.7 22.2 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 11.1 0.0 44.4 44.4 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 33.3 0.0 33.3 2.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 433 001L1 SOCIAL ORGANIZATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Little, P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 46.7 Junior 3 20.0 C 1 6.7 Senior 12 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 6.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 40.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 13 86.7 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 13.3 26.7 53.3 3.3 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 731 001L1 SEM IN SOCIAL AND POLITICAL DYNAMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Little, P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 33.3 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 66.7 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 2 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 652 001S1 DEMOGRAPHIC ARCHAEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pool, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 42.9 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 5 71.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 003L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rivkin-Fish, Michelle ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 22.2 A 6 33.3 Sophomore 12 66.7 B 12 66.7 Junior 1 5.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 22.2 Studies Program 17 94.4 2 hours 2 11.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 8 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 4 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 0.38 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 0.0 83.3 11.1 3.0 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 38.9 50.0 11.1 2.7 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 5.6 83.3 5.6 2.9 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 43.8 50.0 6.3 2.6 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 33.3 55.6 5.6 2.6 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 12.5 81.3 6.3 2.9 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 22.2 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 55.6 38.9 5.6 2.5 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 29.4 64.7 5.9 2.8 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 46.7 53.3 0.0 2.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 11.1 61.1 27.8 0.0 2.2 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 44.4 50.0 5.6 2.6 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 11.1 38.9 44.4 5.6 2.4 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.0 2.9 0.29 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 004L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rivkin-Fish, Michelle ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 23.1 A 7 53.8 Sophomore 7 53.8 B 5 38.5 Junior 1 7.7 C 1 7.7 Senior 2 15.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 38.5 Studies Program 12 92.3 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 1 7.7 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 35.3 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 46.7 33.3 13.3 2.5 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 17.6 23.5 41.2 17.6 2.6 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 29.4 41.2 29.4 3.0 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 29.4 35.3 11.8 23.5 2.3 1.16 14. Encouraged class participation 17 5.9 11.8 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 6.7 33.3 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 5.9 70.6 17.6 3.0 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 35.3 29.4 17.6 17.6 2.2 1.13 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 52.9 29.4 11.8 2.5 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 17.6 35.3 35.3 11.8 2.4 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 15.4 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 70.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 005L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rivkin-Fish, Michelle ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 52.9 Sophomore 12 70.6 B 8 47.1 Junior 5 29.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 29.4 Studies Program 15 88.2 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 2 11.8 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 5.3 73.7 15.8 3.0 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 11.1 33.3 55.6 0.0 2.4 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 30.0 45.0 20.0 2.8 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 20.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 2.4 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 20 10.0 5.0 65.0 20.0 3.0 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 5.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 20.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 30.0 50.0 15.0 2.8 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 5.0 5.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 2.4 1.05 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 47.4 31.6 21.1 2.7 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 38.9 38.9 22.2 2.8 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 006L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rivkin-Fish, Michelle ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.8 A 14 66.7 Sophomore 19 90.5 B 5 23.8 Junior 1 4.8 C 2 9.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.5 Studies Program 19 90.5 2 hours 5 23.8 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 11 52.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 8.3 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 20.8 54.2 25.0 3.0 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 8.3 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 44.4 44.4 11.1 2.7 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 13.0 69.6 17.4 3.0 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 14.3 61.9 23.8 3.1 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 33.3 41.7 20.8 2.8 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 4.2 75.0 20.8 3.2 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 18.2 50.0 31.8 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 27.8 44.4 22.2 2.8 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 58.3 20.8 20.8 2.6 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 0.0 5.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.45 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 007L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rivkin-Fish, Michelle ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 26.3 A 13 68.4 Sophomore 11 57.9 B 3 15.8 Junior 3 15.8 C 2 10.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 5.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 21.1 Studies Program 17 94.4 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 1 5.6 3 hours 4 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 6 31.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 13.6 63.6 22.7 3.1 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 9.1 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 9.1 9.1 68.2 13.6 2.9 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 13.6 63.6 22.7 3.1 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 38.9 55.6 5.6 2.7 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 13.6 31.8 40.9 13.6 2.5 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 13.6 63.6 22.7 3.1 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 93.3 6.7 3.1 0.26 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 4.5 31.8 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.81 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 18.2 45.5 22.7 13.6 2.3 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 18.2 59.1 18.2 2.9 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 9.1 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 33.3 57.1 9.5 2.8 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 9.5 42.9 42.9 4.8 2.4 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 19.0 38.1 28.6 14.3 2.4 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 9.1 27.3 50.0 13.6 2.7 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 22.7 27.3 40.9 9.1 2.4 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 008L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rivkin-Fish, Michelle ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.6 A 12 66.7 Sophomore 14 77.8 B 5 27.8 Junior 3 16.7 C 1 5.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 17 94.4 2 hours 9 50.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 4.8 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 19.0 52.4 28.6 3.1 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 31.6 52.6 15.8 2.8 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 9.5 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 28.6 42.9 23.8 2.9 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 23.8 57.1 19.0 3.0 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 31.6 42.1 26.3 2.9 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 42.9 33.3 19.0 2.7 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 4.8 61.9 28.6 3.1 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 4.8 23.8 33.3 38.1 3.0 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 84.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 009L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rivkin-Fish, Michelle ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 18.2 A 6 54.5 Sophomore 4 36.4 B 4 36.4 Junior 3 27.3 C 1 9.1 Senior 2 18.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 27.3 Studies Program 10 90.9 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 8.3 8.3 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 33.3 41.7 25.0 2.9 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 48.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 601 001S1 THEORIES AND CONCEPTS IN ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rivkin-Fish, Michelle ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 7 70.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 10.0 0.0 60.0 30.0 3.1 0.88 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 10.0 70.0 3.5 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 401L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Stokes, Betty Jo ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 83.3 Sophomore 1 14.3 B 1 16.7 Junior 3 42.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 33.3 Studies Program 5 71.4 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 29.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 301 001L1 HIS ANTHROPOLOGIC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Trawick, Paul ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 21.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 71.4 Junior 5 35.7 C 1 7.1 Senior 8 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 7.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 13 92.9 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 6 42.9 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 220 001L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Udvardy, Monica L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 51.7 Sophomore 7 24.1 B 12 41.4 Junior 12 41.4 C 2 6.9 Senior 7 24.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 6.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 6.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 37.9 Required by my major 19 65.5 3 hours 11 37.9 Other (e.g. elective) 10 34.5 4 - 5 hours 5 17.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 3.4 27.6 69.0 3.7 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 20.7 79.3 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 27.6 72.4 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 0.0 20.7 79.3 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 85.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 770 001S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR: GENDER ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Udvardy, Monica L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 60.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 20.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 3 60.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 327 001L1 CULTURE AND SOCIETIES OF INDIA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = VanWilligen, John J. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.9 A 12 70.6 Sophomore 4 23.5 B 5 29.4 Junior 3 17.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 52.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 9 52.9 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 2 11.8 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 6 35.3 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 11.8 23.5 64.7 3.5 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 17.6 29.4 52.9 3.4 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 11.8 17.6 70.6 3.6 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 5.9 35.3 52.9 3.4 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 54.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 402L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE MODERN WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = White, Jill C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 8 53.3 B 6 40.0 Junior 3 20.0 C 1 6.7 Senior 4 26.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 14 93.3 2 hours 7 46.7 Required by my major 1 6.7 3 hours 2 13.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 13.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 4.5 4.5 22.7 68.2 3.5 0.80 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 4.8 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 4.5 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 4.5 0.0 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 4.5 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 4.5 31.8 63.6 3.6 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 9.1 0.0 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.91 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 9.1 0.0 40.9 50.0 3.3 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 4.5 31.8 59.1 3.5 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 4.5 22.7 72.7 3.7 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 21 4.8 4.8 42.9 47.6 3.3 0.80 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 9.1 4.5 27.3 59.1 3.4 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 19.0 76.2 3.7 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 15.8 36.8 47.4 3.3 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 23.5 35.3 41.2 3.2 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 9.1 13.6 31.8 45.5 3.1 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 4.8 4.8 9.5 81.0 3.7 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 0.0 37.5 50.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 9.1 0.0 18.2 72.7 3.5 0.93 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************