****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 506 001L1 PRODUCTIV/QUAL CONTROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chung, Chen H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 95.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 4.8 Junior 3 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 17 81.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 28.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 33.3 Required by my major 19 90.5 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 53.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 600 401L1 PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chung, Chen H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 25 92.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 7.4 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 23.1 Studies Program 1 3.8 2 hours 11 42.3 Required by my major 25 96.2 3 hours 8 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 3.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 3.2 16.1 71.0 9.7 2.9 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 30.8 15.4 53.8 0.0 2.2 0.91 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 9.7 16.1 67.7 6.5 2.7 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 3.2 0.0 77.4 19.4 3.1 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 74.2 25.8 3.3 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 3.2 83.9 12.9 3.1 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 3.2 0.0 67.7 29.0 3.2 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 10.0 50.0 36.7 3.3 2.3 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 19.4 38.7 38.7 3.2 2.3 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 3.2 0.0 35.5 61.3 3.5 0.68 11. Was available for consultation 20 15.0 5.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 6.5 16.1 71.0 6.5 2.8 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 22.6 29.0 45.2 3.2 2.3 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 31 3.2 9.7 71.0 16.1 3.0 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 13.6 68.2 13.6 2.9 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 10.0 23.3 56.7 10.0 2.7 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 10.0 23.3 60.0 6.7 2.6 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 12.9 19.4 58.1 9.7 2.6 0.84 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 16.1 54.8 29.0 0.0 2.1 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 25.8 41.9 32.3 0.0 2.1 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 29.0 29.0 35.5 6.5 2.2 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 83.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DIS 300 401L1 QUANT ANALY IN OPS MGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hauser, Karina ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 45.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 50.0 Junior 7 29.2 C 1 4.2 Senior 17 70.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 30.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 43.5 Required by my major 22 95.7 3 hours 5 21.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 7.7 0.0 69.2 23.1 3.1 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 72.0 24.0 3.2 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 72.0 28.0 3.3 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 72.0 28.0 3.3 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 12.0 60.0 24.0 3.0 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 11.5 46.2 42.3 3.3 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 32.0 36.0 28.0 2.9 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 0.0 72.7 22.7 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 4.0 8.0 60.0 28.0 3.1 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 4.0 12.0 60.0 24.0 3.0 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 4.0 12.0 60.0 24.0 3.0 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 24.0 48.0 24.0 2.9 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 23.1 57.7 15.4 2.8 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 26.1 43.5 26.1 2.9 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 620 002L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS IN DECISION MAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lederer, Al ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 85.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 15.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 15 75.0 3 hours 3 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 20.0 4 - 5 hours 5 25.0 6 - 7 hours 3 15.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 22.7 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 13.6 63.6 22.7 3.1 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 4.5 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 22.7 54.5 22.7 3.0 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 13.6 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 4.5 0.0 31.8 63.6 3.5 0.74 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 9.1 4.5 45.5 40.9 3.2 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 4.8 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 4.5 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 4.5 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 4.5 4.5 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 9.1 13.6 50.0 27.3 3.0 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 9.1 9.1 40.9 40.9 3.1 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 620 003L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS IN DECISION MAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lederer, Al ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 84.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 16.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 25 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 24.0 Studies Program 2 8.0 2 hours 8 32.0 Required by my major 23 92.0 3 hours 5 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 30.8 61.5 3.8 2.7 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 3.8 19.2 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 30.8 61.5 7.7 2.8 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 73.1 23.1 3.2 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 11.5 65.4 23.1 3.1 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 11.5 69.2 19.2 3.1 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 38.5 42.3 19.2 2.8 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 15.4 50.0 34.6 3.2 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 36.0 44.0 16.0 2.7 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 77.3 13.6 3.0 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 29.2 62.5 8.3 2.8 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 43.5 47.8 8.7 2.7 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 11.5 76.9 11.5 3.0 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 56.0 36.0 8.0 2.5 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 34.6 42.3 19.2 2.8 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 30.8 46.2 19.2 2.8 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 89.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 300 006L1 QUANT ANALY IN OPS MGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lee-Post, Anita ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 64.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 25.0 Junior 5 17.9 C 3 10.7 Senior 23 82.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 60.7 Studies Program 2 7.1 2 hours 8 28.6 Required by my major 26 92.9 3 hours 3 10.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 3.4 3.4 65.5 27.6 3.2 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 10.3 31.0 51.7 6.9 2.6 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 3.4 6.9 65.5 24.1 3.1 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 3.4 6.9 55.2 34.5 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 3.6 7.1 60.7 28.6 3.1 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 60.7 35.7 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 24.1 44.8 27.6 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 3.4 20.7 58.6 17.2 2.9 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 20.7 51.7 27.6 3.1 0.70 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 6.9 24.1 51.7 17.2 2.8 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 14.3 35.7 42.9 7.1 2.4 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 10.7 67.9 21.4 3.1 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 20.8 62.5 12.5 2.8 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 3.4 6.9 72.4 17.2 3.0 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 3.4 3.4 65.5 27.6 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 3.4 13.8 55.2 27.6 3.1 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 10.7 46.4 32.1 10.7 2.4 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 10.3 20.7 55.2 13.8 2.7 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 10.3 17.2 55.2 17.2 2.8 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 56.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 611 401L1 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lee-Post, Anita ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 55.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 55.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 3 33.3 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 6 66.7 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 11.1 44.4 44.4 0.0 2.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 44.4 22.2 33.3 0.0 1.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 11.1 0.0 44.4 44.4 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 12.5 0.0 75.0 12.5 2.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 44.4 22.2 22.2 11.1 2.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 33.3 22.2 33.3 11.1 2.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 22.2 33.3 44.4 0.0 2.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 11.1 77.8 11.1 0.0 2.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 22.2 55.6 22.2 0.0 2.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 11.1 11.1 66.7 11.1 2.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 44.4 33.3 22.2 0.0 1.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 44.4 33.3 11.1 11.1 1.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 44.4 11.1 33.3 11.1 2.1 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 64.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 651 001L1 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN BUSINESS DECISION MAKIN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Muralidhar, K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 58.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 41.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 29 96.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.3 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 23.3 Studies Program 3 10.0 2 hours 11 36.7 Required by my major 26 86.7 3 hours 6 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.3 4 - 5 hours 5 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 3.2 12.9 61.3 22.6 3.0 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 38.7 32.3 25.8 3.2 1.9 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 6.5 12.9 64.5 16.1 2.9 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 3.2 9.7 71.0 16.1 3.0 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 6.5 6.5 67.7 19.4 3.0 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 6.5 29.0 48.4 16.1 2.7 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 3.2 64.5 32.3 3.3 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 3.2 45.2 48.4 3.2 2.5 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 3.3 3.3 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 3.2 12.9 54.8 29.0 3.1 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 3.3 36.7 43.3 16.7 2.7 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 8.0 28.0 56.0 8.0 2.6 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 6.5 9.7 51.6 32.3 3.1 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 9.7 54.8 32.3 3.2 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 3.2 12.9 54.8 29.0 3.1 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 10.3 37.9 48.3 3.4 2.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 9.7 6.5 58.1 25.8 3.0 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 6.5 9.7 61.3 22.6 3.0 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 81.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 651 002L1 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN BUSINESS DECISION MAKIN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Muralidhar, K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 62.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 16 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 12.5 Studies Program 4 25.0 2 hours 1 6.3 Required by my major 12 75.0 3 hours 6 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 4 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 53.3 26.7 13.3 2.5 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 0.0 66.7 26.7 3.1 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 12.5 31.3 43.8 12.5 2.6 0.89 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 33.3 53.3 6.7 2.6 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 37.5 31.3 31.3 2.9 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 18.8 43.8 37.5 3.2 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 76.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 651 401L1 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN BUSINESS DECISION MAKIN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Muralidhar, K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 25.0 Sophomore 1 4.2 B 17 70.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 4.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 23 95.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 8.3 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 22 91.7 3 hours 9 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 20.8 6 - 7 hours 3 12.5 8 or more hours 2 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 3.7 3.7 70.4 22.2 3.1 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 7.4 51.9 40.7 0.0 2.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 7.4 81.5 11.1 3.0 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 3.7 11.1 63.0 22.2 3.0 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 3.7 7.4 74.1 14.8 3.0 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 3.7 29.6 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 7.4 18.5 66.7 7.4 2.7 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 3.7 7.4 63.0 25.9 3.1 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 3.7 0.0 74.1 22.2 3.1 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 3.7 11.1 81.5 3.7 2.9 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 26 3.8 11.5 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 3.7 0.0 55.6 40.7 3.3 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 3.8 3.8 65.4 26.9 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 3.7 0.0 74.1 22.2 3.1 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 8.0 48.0 44.0 0.0 2.4 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 3.7 14.8 44.4 37.0 3.1 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 3.7 7.4 48.1 40.7 3.3 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 67.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DIS 320 003L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Newkirk, Henry ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 26.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 68.4 Junior 3 15.8 C 1 5.3 Senior 16 84.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 10 52.6 3 hours 2 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 9 47.4 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 23.8 61.9 14.3 2.9 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 28.6 47.6 23.8 3.0 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 9.5 76.2 14.3 3.0 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 19.0 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 45.0 40.0 10.0 2.6 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 20.0 25.0 50.0 5.0 2.4 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 5.0 30.0 60.0 5.0 2.7 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 10.5 21.1 52.6 15.8 2.7 0.87 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 15.0 50.0 30.0 5.0 2.3 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 5.0 85.0 10.0 3.1 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 11.1 27.8 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.85 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 15.0 30.0 45.0 10.0 2.5 0.89 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 15.0 25.0 55.0 5.0 2.5 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 9.5 28.6 52.4 9.5 2.6 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 19.0 47.6 28.6 4.8 2.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 9.5 42.9 38.1 9.5 2.5 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 23.8 33.3 38.1 4.8 2.2 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 72.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 520 001L1 ADV BUS DATA PROCSS/INFO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pakath, Ramakrishnan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 71.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 28.1 Junior 3 9.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 21 67.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 22.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 9.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 31.3 Required by my major 26 81.3 3 hours 10 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 18.8 4 - 5 hours 5 15.6 6 - 7 hours 2 6.3 8 or more hours 2 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 34.3 65.7 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 2.9 40.0 57.1 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 8.6 37.1 54.3 3.5 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 8.8 20.6 41.2 29.4 2.9 0.93 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 5.7 54.3 40.0 3.3 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 2.9 40.0 57.1 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 17.1 37.1 45.7 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 17.1 51.4 31.4 3.1 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 2.9 61.8 35.3 3.3 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 14.7 50.0 35.3 3.2 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 5.7 34.3 60.0 3.5 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 2.9 37.1 60.0 3.6 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 31 3.2 0.0 16.1 80.6 0.0 3.7 0.63 38. Question 38 31 3.2 0.0 25.8 71.0 0.0 3.6 0.66 39. Question 39 30 3.3 6.7 23.3 66.7 0.0 3.5 0.78 40. Question 40 31 3.2 0.0 29.0 67.7 0.0 3.6 0.67 41. Question 41 31 3.2 0.0 22.6 74.2 0.0 3.7 0.65 42. Question 42 28 3.6 10.7 35.7 50.0 0.0 3.3 0.82 43. Question 43 31 9.7 0.0 51.6 38.7 0.0 3.2 0.87 44. Question 44 30 3.3 13.3 43.3 40.0 0.0 3.2 0.81 Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 001L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Santhanam, Radhika ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 53.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 34.6 Junior 6 22.2 C 3 11.5 Senior 21 77.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 37.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 40.7 Required by my major 16 59.3 3 hours 5 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 11 40.7 4 - 5 hours 1 3.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 7.1 28.6 50.0 14.3 2.7 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 10.7 57.1 32.1 3.2 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 3.6 7.1 60.7 28.6 3.1 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 3.6 3.6 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 10.7 50.0 39.3 3.3 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 3.6 46.4 50.0 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 26 3.8 0.0 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 3.6 21.4 28.6 46.4 3.2 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 4.0 20.0 52.0 24.0 3.0 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 7.1 53.6 39.3 3.3 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 7.1 46.4 46.4 3.4 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 17.9 46.4 35.7 3.2 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 14.3 39.3 46.4 3.3 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 620 001L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS IN DECISION MAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Santhanam, Radhika ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 72.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 27.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 30 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 20.0 Studies Program 2 6.7 2 hours 13 43.3 Required by my major 26 86.7 3 hours 7 23.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.7 4 - 5 hours 3 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 23.3 50.0 26.7 3.0 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 0.0 72.4 27.6 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 6.7 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 63.3 36.7 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 3.7 77.8 18.5 3.1 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 71.4 25.0 3.2 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 6.7 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 10.3 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 15.4 65.4 19.2 3.0 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 10.0 56.7 33.3 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 24.1 55.2 20.7 3.0 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 0.0 33.3 43.3 23.3 2.9 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 88.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = B&E 300 001L1 CAREER DEVELOPMENT IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hawkins, Julia L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 12.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 37.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 62.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 005L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ali, Mukhtar M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 60.0 Sophomore 2 6.7 B 7 23.3 Junior 12 40.0 C 5 16.7 Senior 16 53.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 16.7 Studies Program 1 3.3 2 hours 14 46.7 Required by my major 29 96.7 3 hours 9 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 2.9 2.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 2.9 29.4 50.0 17.6 2.8 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 8.8 50.0 41.2 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 5.9 55.9 38.2 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 5.9 17.6 47.1 29.4 3.0 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 26.5 44.1 26.5 2.9 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 9.1 6.1 45.5 39.4 3.2 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 3.0 48.5 48.5 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 29 3.4 0.0 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 6.1 9.1 60.6 24.2 3.0 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 12.1 39.4 30.3 18.2 2.5 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 33 6.1 12.1 60.6 21.2 3.0 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 3.7 11.1 66.7 18.5 3.0 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 2.9 2.9 70.6 23.5 3.1 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 8.8 2.9 67.6 20.6 3.0 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 9.1 3.0 60.6 27.3 3.1 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 25.0 37.5 28.1 9.4 2.2 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 11.8 20.6 50.0 17.6 2.7 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 5.9 17.6 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 82.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 706 001L1 INTRO ECONOMETRICS II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ali, Mukhtar M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 15 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 7.1 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 6.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 10 66.7 3 hours 7 46.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 26.7 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 13.3 8 or more hours 3 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 13.3 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 6.3 56.3 31.3 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 731 001L1 LABOR ECONOMICS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berger, Mark C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 60.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 20.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 001L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bollinger, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 50.0 Junior 11 55.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 45.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 30.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 18 90.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 13.6 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 4.5 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 18.2 59.1 18.2 2.9 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 603 001L1 RES MTHDS&PROCEDURE ECON INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bollinger, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 62.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 25.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 75.0 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 2 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 18.2 27.3 45.5 3.1 1.04 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 73.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 411 001L1 BUSINESS ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garen, John E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 41.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 48.4 Junior 2 6.1 C 3 9.7 Senior 31 93.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 34.4 Required by my major 20 60.6 3 hours 10 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 13 39.4 4 - 5 hours 3 9.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 2.9 8.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.75 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 15.2 33.3 42.4 9.1 2.5 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 2.9 47.1 50.0 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 2.9 8.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 6.1 15.2 54.5 24.2 3.0 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 5.9 5.9 44.1 44.1 3.3 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 0.0 48.5 51.5 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 9.1 15.2 54.5 21.2 2.9 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 33 6.1 24.2 45.5 24.2 2.9 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 6.9 20.7 55.2 17.2 2.8 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 3.1 3.1 65.6 28.1 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 3.3 0.0 66.7 30.0 3.2 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 3.0 6.1 57.6 33.3 3.2 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 9.4 25.0 43.8 21.9 2.8 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 6.3 6.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 3.2 9.7 45.2 41.9 3.3 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 59.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 601 001L1 ADV MICROECONOMIC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garen, John E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 51.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 3.7 Senior 1 3.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 27 96.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 7.7 2 hours 3 12.0 Required by my major 22 84.6 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 7.7 4 - 5 hours 6 24.0 6 - 7 hours 4 16.0 8 or more hours 4 16.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 9.4 43.8 46.9 3.4 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 3.1 31.3 65.6 3.6 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 6.3 18.8 31.3 43.8 3.1 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 12.5 46.9 40.6 3.3 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 21.9 78.1 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 6.7 3.3 60.0 30.0 3.1 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 16.1 54.8 29.0 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 13.3 63.3 20.0 3.0 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 3.1 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 9.4 34.4 56.3 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 412 001L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gift, Richard E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 22.2 Junior 3 33.3 C 1 11.1 Senior 5 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 11.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 66.7 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 33.3 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 22.2 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 10.0 10.0 40.0 40.0 3.1 0.99 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 1.23 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 20.0 10.0 20.0 50.0 3.0 1.25 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 20.0 0.0 70.0 3.3 1.16 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 10.0 20.0 0.0 70.0 3.3 1.16. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 34.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 412 002L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gift, Richard E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 42.9 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 2 28.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 12.5 25.0 12.5 50.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 37.5 25.0 37.5 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 25.0 12.5 62.5 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 50.0 12.5 37.5 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 32.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 499 001S1 SEM ECONOMICS:THE WEALTH OF NATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gift, Richard E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 60.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 46.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 202 004L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gillette, James R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 1.7 A 37 32.5 Sophomore 60 52.2 B 55 48.2 Junior 40 34.8 C 20 17.5 Senior 12 10.4 D 2 1.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 23.9 Studies Program 5 4.4 2 hours 38 33.6 Required by my major 100 88.5 3 hours 34 30.1 Other (e.g. elective) 8 7.1 4 - 5 hours 13 11.5 6 - 7 hours 1 0.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 129 0.0 0.8 50.4 48.8 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 131 0.8 3.1 53.4 42.7 3.4 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 131 0.8 0.8 43.5 55.0 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 130 0.0 0.8 41.5 57.7 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 130 0.0 4.6 43.1 52.3 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 129 0.0 3.9 51.2 45.0 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 130 0.0 6.2 54.6 39.2 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 121 1.7 31.4 45.5 21.5 2.9 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 130 0.8 3.1 36.9 59.2 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 131 0.0 0.8 26.0 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 123 0.8 0.8 47.2 51.2 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 129 0.0 0.8 41.9 57.4 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 131 1.5 6.1 32.8 59.5 3.5 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 131 0.0 0.8 38.2 61.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 121 0.0 3.3 60.3 36.4 3.3 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 130 0.0 2.3 53.1 44.6 3.4 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 127 0.0 3.9 52.8 43.3 3.4 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 129 0.0 0.8 47.3 51.9 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 128 2.3 18.0 47.7 32.0 3.1 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 131 0.8 4.6 36.6 58.0 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 131 0.0 5.3 19.1 75.6 3.7 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 311 Number of forms scanned = 132 Number of forms with at least one student response = 131 Percent completed = 42.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 202 006L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gillette, James R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.4 A 18 43.9 Sophomore 11 26.8 B 15 36.6 Junior 14 34.1 C 7 17.1 Senior 12 29.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 7.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 4.9 Studies Program 2 4.9 2 hours 18 43.9 Required by my major 34 82.9 3 hours 16 39.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 12.2 4 - 5 hours 4 9.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 45 2.2 0.0 42.2 55.6 3.5 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 45 0.0 8.9 40.0 51.1 3.4 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 45 2.2 0.0 24.4 73.3 3.7 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 2.2 0.0 26.7 71.1 3.7 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 2.2 2.2 35.6 60.0 3.5 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 45 2.2 0.0 42.2 55.6 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 45 2.2 0.0 51.1 46.7 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 2.5 15.0 45.0 37.5 3.2 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 45 2.2 0.0 24.4 73.3 3.7 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 45 2.2 0.0 15.6 82.2 3.8 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 40 2.5 0.0 42.5 55.0 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 0.0 4.4 40.0 55.6 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 45 2.2 4.4 24.4 68.9 3.6 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 45 2.2 2.2 17.8 77.8 3.7 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 2.3 0.0 56.8 40.9 3.4 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 44 2.3 2.3 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 44 2.3 2.3 43.2 52.3 3.5 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 44 2.3 0.0 34.1 63.6 3.6 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 2.3 9.1 50.0 38.6 3.3 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 45 0.0 2.2 35.6 62.2 3.6 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 45 0.0 0.0 15.6 84.4 3.8 0.37. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 45 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 007L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gillette, James R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 55.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 36.2 Junior 22 46.8 C 4 8.5 Senior 25 53.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 4.3 Studies Program 2 4.3 2 hours 14 29.8 Required by my major 45 95.7 3 hours 18 38.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 10 21.3 6 - 7 hours 1 2.1 8 or more hours 2 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 51 0.0 0.0 15.7 84.3 3.8 0.37 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 51 0.0 0.0 45.1 54.9 3.5 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 51 0.0 0.0 19.6 80.4 3.8 0.40 4. Exams reflected what was taught 51 0.0 0.0 13.7 86.3 3.9 0.35 5. Grading was fair and consistent 51 0.0 2.0 15.7 82.4 3.8 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 51 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 51 0.0 0.0 19.6 80.4 3.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 49 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 51 0.0 2.0 9.8 88.2 3.9 0.40 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 51 0.0 2.0 5.9 92.2 3.9 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 51 0.0 2.0 11.8 86.3 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 51 0.0 2.0 11.8 86.3 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 51 0.0 2.0 35.3 62.7 3.6 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 51 0.0 2.0 5.9 92.2 3.9 0.36 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 4.3 41.3 54.3 3.5 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 50 0.0 2.0 32.0 66.0 3.6 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 50 0.0 2.0 26.0 72.0 3.7 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 50 0.0 2.0 30.0 68.0 3.7 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 49 0.0 20.4 36.7 42.9 3.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 50 2.0 0.0 30.0 68.0 3.6 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 50 0.0 2.0 2.0 96.0 3.9 0.31. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 51 Number of forms with at least one student response = 51 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 465G401L1 COMPARATIVE ECO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harvey, Curtis E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 38.9 Junior 4 20.0 C 3 16.7 Senior 13 65.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 15.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 40.0 Required by my major 11 55.0 3 hours 6 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 45.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 1 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 13.0 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 17.4 69.6 13.0 3.0 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 34.8 56.5 8.7 2.7 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 24.0 56.0 16.0 2.8 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 4.0 32.0 64.0 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 22 4.5 4.5 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 24.0 56.0 20.0 3.0 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 8.0 16.0 48.0 28.0 3.0 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 20.0 56.0 24.0 3.0 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 12.0 12.0 52.0 24.0 2.9 0.93 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 13.6 27.3 45.5 13.6 2.6 0.91 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 8.0 8.0 60.0 24.0 3.0 0.82 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 32.0 44.0 20.0 2.8 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 28.0 44.0 24.0 2.9 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 12.0 28.0 36.0 24.0 2.7 0.98. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 59.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 499 003S1 SEM ECONOMICS:THE GLOBAL ECONOMY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harvey, Curtis E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 20.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 75.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 1 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 55.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 201 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, Gail ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 12.2 A 25 50.0 Sophomore 18 36.7 B 22 44.0 Junior 17 34.7 C 3 6.0 Senior 6 12.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 16.0 Studies Program 5 10.0 2 hours 19 38.0 Required by my major 34 68.0 3 hours 19 38.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 22.0 4 - 5 hours 4 8.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 55 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 54 0.0 11.1 59.3 29.6 3.2 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 55 0.0 1.8 30.9 67.3 3.7 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 55 1.8 1.8 38.2 58.2 3.5 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 55 1.8 0.0 36.4 61.8 3.6 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 55 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 55 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 54 0.0 13.0 53.7 33.3 3.2 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 55 1.8 0.0 25.5 72.7 3.7 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 55 0.0 0.0 25.5 74.5 3.7 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 51 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 55 0.0 1.8 32.7 65.5 3.6 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 55 0.0 3.6 45.5 50.9 3.5 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 55 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 2.3 2.3 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 55 1.8 0.0 50.9 47.3 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 54 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 55 0.0 0.0 49.1 50.9 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 53 1.9 28.3 50.9 18.9 2.9 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 55 0.0 0.0 29.1 70.9 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 55 0.0 1.8 10.9 87.3 3.9 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 63 Number of forms scanned = 55 Number of forms with at least one student response = 55 Percent completed = 87.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 201 002L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, Gail ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 9.4 A 29 54.7 Sophomore 28 52.8 B 20 37.7 Junior 14 26.4 C 4 7.5 Senior 5 9.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 11.5 Studies Program 6 11.3 2 hours 21 40.4 Required by my major 39 73.6 3 hours 17 32.7 Other (e.g. elective) 8 15.1 4 - 5 hours 8 15.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 54 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 53 1.9 11.3 49.1 37.7 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 54 0.0 0.0 35.2 64.8 3.6 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 54 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 54 0.0 0.0 35.2 64.8 3.6 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 54 0.0 1.9 33.3 64.8 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 54 0.0 0.0 42.6 57.4 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 53 0.0 24.5 50.9 24.5 3.0 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 54 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 54 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 53 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 54 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 54 0.0 7.4 37.0 55.6 3.5 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 54 0.0 1.9 14.8 83.3 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 10.9 56.5 32.6 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 54 0.0 1.9 48.1 50.0 3.5 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 54 0.0 1.9 57.4 40.7 3.4 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 54 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 0.0 17.3 51.9 30.8 3.1 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 54 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 54 0.0 0.0 9.3 90.7 3.9 0.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 64 Number of forms scanned = 54 Number of forms with at least one student response = 54 Percent completed = 84.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 201 004L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, Gail ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 62 21.1 A 120 41.2 Sophomore 166 56.5 B 125 43.0 Junior 46 15.6 C 43 14.8 Senior 17 5.8 D 2 0.7 Graduate 1 0.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.7 Pass or Audit 1 0.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 91 31.1 Studies Program 68 23.2 2 hours 95 32.4 Required by my major 184 62.8 3 hours 69 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 41 14.0 4 - 5 hours 34 11.6 6 - 7 hours 4 1.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 319 0.0 0.9 48.3 50.8 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 317 4.1 12.0 55.5 28.4 3.1 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 318 0.6 2.8 50.6 45.9 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 319 0.3 3.1 55.8 40.8 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 320 0.0 1.3 50.9 47.8 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 318 0.3 1.9 50.6 47.2 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 319 0.6 4.1 54.2 41.1 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 295 2.7 23.4 49.8 24.1 3.0 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 320 0.0 0.9 39.7 59.4 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 320 0.0 0.3 22.8 76.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 291 0.3 0.0 45.7 54.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 314 0.3 1.3 48.1 50.3 3.5 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 318 0.9 9.1 49.1 40.9 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 318 0.6 0.6 32.1 66.7 3.6 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 283 0.4 13.4 61.1 25.1 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 316 0.3 5.1 61.7 32.9 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 307 0.7 9.4 62.9 27.0 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 319 0.0 1.3 63.0 35.7 3.3 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 312 3.5 35.6 43.9 17.0 2.7 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 319 0.0 4.4 49.8 45.8 3.4 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 320 0.0 0.9 22.2 76.9 3.8 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 78 3.8 16.7 59.0 20.5 3.0 0.73 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 109 3.7 10.1 61.5 24.8 3.1 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 104 4.8 8.7 63.5 23.1 3.0 0.72 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 35 2.9 25.7 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.82 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 33 0.0 15.2 51.5 33.3 3.2 0.68 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 28. Guided student report preparation 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 29. Students free to express opinions 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 31. Developed abil to conduct research 20 5.0 15.0 55.0 25.0 3.0 0.79 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 33. Amount of work appropriate 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 34. Instructor explained expectations 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 35. Instructor helped with my problems 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 535 Number of forms scanned = 322 Number of forms with at least one student response = 321 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 590 001L1 INTRO QUANTITATV ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, William H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 40.9 Junior 1 4.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 21 95.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.5 Studies Program 4 18.2 2 hours 1 4.5 Required by my major 12 54.5 3 hours 6 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 27.3 4 - 5 hours 9 40.9 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 4 18.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 21.7 47.8 30.4 3.1 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 13.0 30.4 21.7 34.8 2.8 1.09 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 21.7 43.5 34.8 3.1 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 21.7 73.9 3.7 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 23 4.3 8.7 34.8 52.2 3.3 0.83 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 27.3 40.9 31.8 3.0 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 13.6 50.0 31.8 3.1 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 6.3 50.0 37.5 3.2 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 21.1 36.8 36.8 3.1 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 13.0 34.8 52.2 3.4 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 610 003L1 MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, William H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 41.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 46.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 7.7 I 0 0.0 Other 6 46.2 Pass or Audit 1 8.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 7.7 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 6 46.2 Other (e.g. elective) 9 69.2 4 - 5 hours 4 30.8 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 30.8 61.5 0.0 2.5 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 751 001S1 PUBLIC ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, William H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 88.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 12.5 Other 1 11.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 3 33.3 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 6 66.7 4 - 5 hours 4 44.4 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 69.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 401 001L1 INTERMED MICROECO THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Newlon, Elizabeth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 36.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 40.9 Junior 9 39.1 C 5 22.7 Senior 13 56.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 21.7 Required by my major 21 91.3 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.7 4 - 5 hours 4 17.4 6 - 7 hours 4 17.4 8 or more hours 4 17.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 4.0 36.0 44.0 16.0 2.7 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 4.0 20.0 64.0 12.0 2.8 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 12.0 40.0 48.0 0.0 2.4 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 4.0 16.0 64.0 16.0 2.9 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 76.0 20.0 3.2 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 4.0 40.0 44.0 12.0 2.6 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 12.0 52.0 36.0 0.0 2.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 12.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 24 4.2 16.7 45.8 33.3 3.1 0.83 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 4.0 32.0 60.0 4.0 2.6 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 13.0 52.2 30.4 4.3 2.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 25 12.0 16.0 44.0 28.0 2.9 0.97 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 12.5 25.0 62.5 0.0 2.5 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 16.7 75.0 4.2 2.8 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 4.0 24.0 64.0 8.0 2.8 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 8.0 24.0 60.0 8.0 2.7 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 65.2 21.7 4.3 2.2 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 12.0 16.0 68.0 4.0 2.6 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 24.0 56.0 16.0 4.0 2.0 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 58.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 401 002L1 INTERMED MICROECO THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Newlon, Elizabeth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 29.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 51.9 Junior 4 14.3 C 4 14.8 Senior 21 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 10.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 29.6 Required by my major 23 88.5 3 hours 5 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 11.5 4 - 5 hours 9 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 3 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 3.4 10.3 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 6.9 3.4 69.0 20.7 3.0 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 3.4 6.9 48.3 41.4 3.3 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 7.1 25.0 46.4 21.4 2.8 0.86 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 13.8 58.6 24.1 3.0 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 3.4 72.4 24.1 3.2 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 3.4 3.4 51.7 41.4 3.3 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 10.7 42.9 28.6 17.9 2.5 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 27.6 24.1 31.0 17.2 2.4 1.08 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 3.4 0.0 69.0 27.6 3.2 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 26 3.8 0.0 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 6.9 41.4 37.9 13.8 2.6 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 10.3 37.9 41.4 10.3 2.5 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 28 7.1 39.3 46.4 7.1 2.5 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 10.0 45.0 35.0 10.0 2.5 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 14.3 57.1 25.0 3.0 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 3.4 13.8 55.2 27.6 3.1 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 6.9 10.3 65.5 17.2 2.9 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 10.7 46.4 32.1 10.7 2.4 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 7.1 28.6 46.4 17.9 2.8 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 17.9 32.1 35.7 14.3 2.5 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 64.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ECO 412 003L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Purvis, M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 47.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 35.3 Junior 17 50.0 C 4 11.8 Senior 17 50.0 D 2 5.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 29.4 Studies Program 2 5.9 2 hours 13 38.2 Required by my major 27 79.4 3 hours 5 14.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 14.7 4 - 5 hours 5 14.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 2.9 0.0 73.5 23.5 3.2 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 14.3 65.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 2.9 77.1 20.0 3.2 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 2.9 2.9 71.4 22.9 3.1 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 8.6 68.6 22.9 3.1 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 62.9 37.1 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 2.9 8.6 60.0 28.6 3.1 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 23.5 50.0 26.5 3.0 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 2.9 2.9 67.6 26.5 3.2 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 8.8 64.7 26.5 3.2 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 5.9 29.4 44.1 20.6 2.8 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 2.9 73.5 23.5 3.2 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 8.6 71.4 20.0 3.1 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 2.9 77.1 20.0 3.2 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 2.9 68.6 28.6 3.3 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 2.9 25.7 51.4 20.0 2.9 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 14.3 65.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 2.9 20.0 62.9 14.3 2.9 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 79.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ECO 412 006L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Purvis, M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 42.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 42.4 Junior 13 37.1 C 5 15.2 Senior 22 62.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 34.3 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 16 45.7 Required by my major 28 82.4 3 hours 5 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 14.7 4 - 5 hours 2 5.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 0.0 5.4 62.2 32.4 3.3 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 0.0 43.2 56.8 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 2.8 61.1 36.1 3.3 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 2.7 51.4 45.9 3.4 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 2.7 0.0 48.6 48.6 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 2.7 5.4 48.6 43.2 3.3 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 37 2.7 0.0 51.4 45.9 3.4 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 3.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 2.8 58.3 38.9 3.4 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 5.7 51.4 42.9 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 5.6 52.8 41.7 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 3.0 12.1 54.5 30.3 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 8.1 5.4 45.9 40.5 3.2 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 5.4 5.4 40.5 48.6 3.3 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 77.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 412 004L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Reed, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 67.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 32.4 Junior 6 17.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 28 82.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 32.4 Required by my major 30 88.2 3 hours 6 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 11.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 26.3 36.8 31.6 5.3 2.2 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 0.0 10.5 71.1 18.4 3.1 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 2.6 52.6 44.7 3.4 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 2.6 60.5 36.8 3.3 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 7.9 57.9 34.2 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 25.7 60.0 14.3 2.9 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 2.6 21.1 44.7 31.6 3.1 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 7.9 63.2 28.9 3.2 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 10.5 34.2 39.5 15.8 2.6 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 38 5.3 28.9 50.0 15.8 2.8 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 3.6 14.3 64.3 17.9 3.0 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 2.8 5.6 80.6 11.1 3.0 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 2.6 78.9 18.4 3.2 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 11.1 41.7 44.4 2.8 2.4 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 5.3 13.2 60.5 21.1 3.0 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 2.6 15.8 50.0 31.6 3.1 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 412 005L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Reed, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 30.0 Junior 10 33.3 C 1 3.3 Senior 20 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 40.0 Studies Program 1 3.3 2 hours 15 50.0 Required by my major 27 90.0 3 hours 1 3.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.7 4 - 5 hours 2 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 61.3 38.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 37.5 25.0 37.5 0.0 2.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 9.7 64.5 25.8 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 80.6 19.4 3.2 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 12.9 71.0 16.1 3.0 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 22.6 61.3 16.1 2.9 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 6.5 67.7 25.8 3.2 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 3.3 26.7 56.7 13.3 2.8 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 9.7 71.0 19.4 3.1 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 7.7 84.6 7.7 3.0 0.40 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 3.3 76.7 20.0 3.2 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 6.5 77.4 16.1 3.1 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 6.5 74.2 19.4 3.1 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 10.0 30.0 53.3 6.7 2.6 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 20.0 63.3 16.7 3.0 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 9.7 64.5 25.8 3.2 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 59.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 499 002S1 SEM ECONOMICS: LAW AND ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Scott, Frank A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 66.7 Junior 1 7.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 92.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 30.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 13 100.0 3 hours 4 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 7.7 0.0 46.2 46.2 3.3 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 610 401L1 MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Scott, Frank A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 33 50.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 28 43.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 4.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 1.5 Graduate 66 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 7.6 Studies Program 4 6.1 2 hours 18 27.3 Required by my major 60 90.9 3 hours 20 30.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 3.0 4 - 5 hours 12 18.2 6 - 7 hours 8 12.1 8 or more hours 3 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 67 0.0 3.0 64.2 32.8 3.3 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 67 0.0 6.0 58.2 35.8 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 57 1.8 3.5 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 67 0.0 6.0 68.7 25.4 3.2 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 66 1.5 7.6 65.2 25.8 3.2 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 50 2.0 2.0 72.0 24.0 3.2 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 66 0.0 0.0 57.6 42.4 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 48 2.1 20.8 70.8 6.3 2.8 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 67 1.5 4.5 61.2 32.8 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 67 0.0 1.5 41.8 56.7 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 62 8.1 27.4 50.0 14.5 2.7 0.82 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 0.0 4.5 58.2 37.3 3.3 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 67 3.0 14.9 65.7 16.4 3.0 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 65 0.0 7.7 70.8 21.5 3.1 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 53 1.9 17.0 69.8 11.3 2.9 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 66 0.0 4.5 77.3 18.2 3.1 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 66 0.0 6.1 71.2 22.7 3.2 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 67 0.0 3.0 70.1 26.9 3.2 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 67 1.5 47.8 46.3 4.5 2.5 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 67 1.5 9.0 62.7 26.9 3.1 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 67 4.5 4.5 53.7 37.3 3.2 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 88 Number of forms scanned = 67 Number of forms with at least one student response = 67 Percent completed = 76.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ECO 101 001L1 CONTEMPORARY ECO ISSUES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Sowards, Jason ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 26.3 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 4 21.1 B 8 44.4 Junior 3 15.8 C 2 11.1 Senior 5 26.3 D 1 5.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 10.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 21.1 Studies Program 8 42.1 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 7 36.8 3 hours 3 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 4 21.1 4 - 5 hours 4 21.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 14.3 47.6 33.3 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 19.0 42.9 38.1 3.2 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 4.8 4.8 42.9 47.6 3.3 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 19.0 47.6 33.3 3.1 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 14.3 38.1 47.6 3.3 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 23.8 38.1 38.1 3.1 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 31.6 36.8 26.3 2.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 25.0 45.0 30.0 3.1 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ECO 101 002L1 CONTEMPORARY ECO ISSUES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Sowards, Jason ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 32.0 A 12 52.2 Sophomore 5 20.0 B 9 39.1 Junior 9 36.0 C 2 8.7 Senior 3 12.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 16.0 Studies Program 12 48.0 2 hours 10 40.0 Required by my major 10 40.0 3 hours 10 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 12.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 3.7 59.3 37.0 3.3 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 7.7 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 7.4 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 3.8 3.8 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 8.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 72.0 20.0 3.1 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 8.0 68.0 24.0 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 3.8 76.9 19.2 3.2 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 11.1 33.3 40.7 14.8 2.6 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 3.7 11.1 48.1 37.0 3.2 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 58.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 602 001L1 MACROECONOMIC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Toma, Mark ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 64.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 35.3 Junior 1 5.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 16 94.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 17.6 2 hours 2 11.8 Required by my major 13 76.5 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 8 47.1 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 11.8 23.5 17.6 47.1 3.0 1.12 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 78.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 471 001L1 INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Trask, Kathleen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 27.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 16 55.2 Junior 2 6.9 C 4 13.8 Senior 24 82.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 6.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.4 Pass or Audit 1 3.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 10.3 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 11 37.9 Required by my major 19 67.9 3 hours 11 37.9 Other (e.g. elective) 8 28.6 4 - 5 hours 4 13.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 0.0 69.7 30.3 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 3.0 18.2 54.5 24.2 3.0 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 3.0 51.5 45.5 3.4 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 12.1 39.4 48.5 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 0.0 51.5 48.5 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 51.5 48.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 3.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 6.1 60.6 33.3 3.3 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 3.0 33.3 63.6 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 21.2 54.5 24.2 3.0 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 3.0 63.6 33.3 3.3 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 6.1 63.6 30.3 3.2 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 0.0 3.0 66.7 30.3 3.3 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 3.0 18.2 51.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 3.0 9.1 51.5 36.4 3.2 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 0.0 6.1 48.5 45.5 3.4 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 61 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 54.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 473G001L1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Trask, Kathleen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 5 41.7 Junior 3 23.1 C 3 25.0 Senior 7 53.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 15.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 50.0 Required by my major 8 66.7 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 33.3 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 15.4 23.1 61.5 3.5 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 53.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ECO 201 401L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Vishwanathan, Raman ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 15.2 A 22 66.7 Sophomore 16 48.5 B 9 27.3 Junior 3 9.1 C 1 3.0 Senior 1 3.0 D 1 3.0 Graduate 3 9.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 12.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 39.4 Studies Program 5 16.1 2 hours 11 33.3 Required by my major 16 51.6 3 hours 4 12.1 Other (e.g. elective) 10 32.3 4 - 5 hours 4 12.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 0.0 15.8 60.5 23.7 3.1 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 2.6 44.7 52.6 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 11.1 52.8 36.1 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 2.6 0.0 50.0 47.4 3.4 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 2.8 55.6 41.7 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 2.6 47.4 50.0 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 2.6 7.9 52.6 36.8 3.2 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 38 0.0 10.5 55.3 34.2 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 2.7 5.4 59.5 32.4 3.2 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 5.4 64.9 29.7 3.2 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 5.4 24.3 43.2 27.0 2.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 0.0 5.3 65.8 28.9 3.2 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 12.5 12.5 75.0 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 58 Number of forms scanned = 41 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 67.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 402 001L1 INTERMED MACROECO THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Waller, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 15.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 46.9 Junior 9 28.1 C 12 37.5 Senior 23 71.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 29.0 Required by my major 31 96.9 3 hours 10 32.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.1 4 - 5 hours 5 16.1 6 - 7 hours 2 6.5 8 or more hours 1 3.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 8.8 55.9 35.3 3.3 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 52.2 30.4 13.0 4.3 1.7 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 26.1 34.8 21.7 17.4 2.3 1.06 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 5.9 5.9 55.9 32.4 3.1 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 20.6 47.1 32.4 3.1 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 12.0 12.0 52.0 24.0 2.9 0.93 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 15.2 33.3 36.4 15.2 2.5 0.94 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 3.1 34.4 46.9 15.6 2.8 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 2.9 8.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 3.2 67.7 29.0 3.3 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 8.8 58.8 32.4 3.2 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 11.8 55.9 32.4 3.2 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 34 11.8 35.3 38.2 14.7 2.6 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 3.6 14.3 50.0 32.1 3.1 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 2.9 61.8 35.3 3.3 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 2.9 67.6 29.4 3.3 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 5.9 50.0 44.1 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 3.0 12.1 60.6 24.2 3.1 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 17.6 55.9 26.5 3.1 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 5.9 26.5 29.4 38.2 3.0 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 70.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 402 002L1 INTERMED MACROECO THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Waller, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 13.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 59.1 Junior 4 18.2 C 6 27.3 Senior 17 77.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 31.8 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 14 63.6 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 7 31.8 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 69.6 30.4 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 33.3 50.0 8.3 8.3 1.9 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 33.3 44.4 11.1 11.1 2.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 8.7 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 15.4 7.7 46.2 30.8 2.9 1.04 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 18.2 63.6 13.6 2.9 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 13.0 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 4.3 0.0 43.5 52.2 3.4 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 18.2 40.9 36.4 3.1 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 13.0 69.6 13.0 2.9 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 12.5 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 40.0 40.0 15.0 2.7 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 13.0 26.1 56.5 3.3 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 67.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 771 001L1 INTERNTNL ECO:INTERNTNLI MONEY AND FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Waller, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 42.9 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 464 001L1 REAL ESTATE FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ambrose, Brent ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 34.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 52.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 13.0 Senior 23 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.7 Studies Program 1 4.3 2 hours 11 47.8 Required by my major 18 78.3 3 hours 7 30.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 17.4 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 2 8.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 4.0 0.0 76.0 20.0 3.1 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 37.5 50.0 4.2 2.5 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 20.0 68.0 12.0 2.9 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 12.0 72.0 16.0 3.0 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 4.0 12.0 72.0 12.0 2.9 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 12.0 64.0 24.0 3.1 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 8.3 41.7 45.8 4.2 2.5 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 28.0 40.0 28.0 2.9 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 25 4.0 28.0 68.0 0.0 2.6 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 8.0 76.0 16.0 3.1 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 16.0 20.0 32.0 32.0 2.8 1.08 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 36.0 56.0 8.0 2.7 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 18.2 77.3 4.5 2.9 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 16.0 60.0 24.0 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 8.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 12.5 50.0 20.8 2.8 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 8.0 16.0 52.0 24.0 2.9 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 8.0 28.0 52.0 12.0 2.7 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 745 001S1 SEMIN MANAGERIAL FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ambrose, Brent ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 5 100.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 423 001L1 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chew, It Keong K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 3.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 22.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 11 40.7 Senior 27 100.0 D 9 33.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 11.1 Required by my major 22 81.5 3 hours 10 37.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 18.5 4 - 5 hours 7 25.9 6 - 7 hours 3 11.1 8 or more hours 1 3.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 11.5 11.5 73.1 3.8 2.7 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 18.5 37.0 40.7 3.7 2.3 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 15.4 38.5 38.5 7.7 2.4 0.85 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 57.7 19.2 23.1 0.0 1.7 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 50.0 19.2 30.8 0.0 1.8 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 4.5 9.1 77.3 9.1 2.9 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 4.2 87.5 4.2 2.9 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 28.6 52.4 19.0 0.0 1.9 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 42.3 38.5 19.2 0.0 1.8 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 7.4 74.1 18.5 3.1 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 15.4 26.9 57.7 0.0 2.4 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 38.5 42.3 19.2 0.0 1.8 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 25 24.0 32.0 44.0 0.0 2.2 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 15.8 26.3 52.6 5.3 2.5 0.84 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 22.2 37.0 40.7 0.0 2.2 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 28.0 32.0 40.0 0.0 2.1 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 25.9 25.9 48.1 0.0 2.2 0.85 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 34.6 38.5 26.9 0.0 1.9 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 30.8 34.6 34.6 0.0 2.0 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 53.8 23.1 23.1 0.0 1.7 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 51.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 445 001L1 CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND FINANCING DECISIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chew, It Keong K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 64.7 Junior 1 5.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 16 94.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 3 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 6 35.3 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 10.5 78.9 10.5 3.0 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 36.8 26.3 31.6 5.3 2.1 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 21.1 31.6 36.8 10.5 2.4 0.96 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 21.1 26.3 42.1 10.5 2.4 0.96 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 15.8 47.4 36.8 0.0 2.2 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 21.1 68.4 5.3 2.7 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 31.6 63.2 5.3 2.7 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 42.1 10.5 42.1 5.3 2.1 1.05 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 44.4 50.0 5.6 2.6 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 27.8 38.9 16.7 16.7 2.2 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 21.4 64.3 7.1 2.7 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 26.3 57.9 10.5 2.7 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 27.8 61.1 5.6 2.7 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 15.8 31.6 47.4 5.3 2.4 0.84 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 27.8 33.3 33.3 5.6 2.2 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 26.3 31.6 26.3 15.8 2.3 1.06 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 31.6 21.1 31.6 15.8 2.3 1.11. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 65.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 452 001L1 OPTIONS AND FUTURES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Childs, Paul D. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 43.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 6.7 Senior 30 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 6.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 50.0 Required by my major 22 73.3 3 hours 10 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 26.7 4 - 5 hours 2 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 3.1 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 3.1 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 21.9 78.1 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 14.8 59.3 25.9 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 3.1 3.1 50.0 43.8 3.3 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 3.1 25.0 71.9 3.7 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 452 002L1 OPTIONS AND FUTURES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Childs, Paul D. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 7.1 Senior 29 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 17.9 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 8 28.6 Required by my major 23 82.1 3 hours 11 39.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 14.3 4 - 5 hours 2 7.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.6 8 or more hours 1 3.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 3.1 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 15.6 65.6 18.8 3.0 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 3.2 41.9 54.8 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 3.1 0.0 59.4 37.5 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 13.3 56.7 30.0 3.2 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 3.1 59.4 37.5 3.3 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 18.8 37.5 43.8 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 12.9 54.8 32.3 3.2 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 17.4 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 9.7 45.2 45.2 3.4 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 6.5 48.4 45.2 3.4 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 3.1 12.5 56.3 28.1 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 6.3 34.4 59.4 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 78.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 445 002L1 CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND FINANCING DECISIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooney, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 46.7 Junior 5 33.3 C 3 20.0 Senior 10 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 13.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 15 100.0 3 hours 7 46.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 26.7 33.3 33.3 6.7 2.2 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 55.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 445 003L1 CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND FINANCING DECISIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooney, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 26.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 53.8 Junior 2 7.7 C 4 15.4 Senior 24 92.3 D 1 3.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 15.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 30.8 Required by my major 26 100.0 3 hours 9 34.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 11.5 6 - 7 hours 2 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 19.2 38.5 30.8 11.5 2.3 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 11.5 61.5 26.9 3.2 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 11.5 34.6 38.5 15.4 2.6 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 3.8 19.2 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 25 4.0 0.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 11.5 46.2 42.3 3.3 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 23.1 53.8 19.2 2.9 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 19.2 46.2 34.6 3.2 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 11.5 42.3 46.2 3.3 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 3.8 0.0 69.2 26.9 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 3.8 26.9 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 24.0 40.0 32.0 3.0 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 7.7 19.2 34.6 38.5 3.0 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 445 004L1 CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND FINANCING DECISIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooney, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 50.0 Junior 6 42.9 C 2 14.3 Senior 8 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.1 Required by my major 13 92.9 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 7 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 46.7 26.7 20.0 2.6 0.91 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 12.5 18.8 68.8 3.6 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 59.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 350 001L1 FUNDAMENTLS OF INVESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Keith H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 26.7 Junior 1 3.2 C 4 13.3 Senior 30 96.8 D 1 3.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 64.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 25.8 Required by my major 3 9.7 3 hours 3 9.7 Other (e.g. elective) 28 90.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 9.7 12.9 54.8 22.6 2.9 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 3.8 7.7 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 8.7 26.1 56.5 8.7 2.7 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 6.3 65.6 28.1 3.2 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 3.1 0.0 56.3 40.6 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 3.1 9.4 46.9 40.6 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 32 3.1 12.5 53.1 31.3 3.1 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 15.0 55.0 25.0 3.0 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 3.2 9.7 58.1 29.0 3.1 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 9.7 58.1 29.0 3.1 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 3.1 65.6 31.3 3.3 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 3.2 9.7 48.4 38.7 3.2 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 12.9 25.8 61.3 3.5 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 3.2 9.7 32.3 54.8 3.4 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 68.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 423 002L1 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Keith H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 38.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 48.4 Junior 2 6.5 C 4 12.9 Senior 29 93.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 9.7 Studies Program 1 3.2 2 hours 17 54.8 Required by my major 25 80.6 3 hours 9 29.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 16.1 4 - 5 hours 2 6.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 59.4 40.6 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 12.5 71.9 15.6 3.0 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 9.4 53.1 37.5 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 3.1 56.3 40.6 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 3.2 29.0 48.4 19.4 2.8 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 9.4 6.3 65.6 18.8 2.9 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 3.1 34.4 62.5 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 3.1 9.4 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 6.3 12.5 65.6 15.6 2.9 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 21.9 62.5 15.6 2.9 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 6.3 59.4 34.4 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 3.1 3.1 59.4 34.4 3.3 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 6.3 25.0 56.3 12.5 2.8 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 9.4 68.8 21.9 3.1 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 6.3 9.4 53.1 31.3 3.1 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 74.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 450 001L1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jordan, Bradford ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 50.0 Junior 1 3.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 29 96.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 23.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 30.0 Required by my major 28 93.3 3 hours 11 36.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.7 4 - 5 hours 1 3.3 6 - 7 hours 2 6.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 43.3 56.7 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 7.1 10.7 60.7 21.4 3.0 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 3.3 46.7 50.0 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 65.5 34.5 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 10.3 51.7 37.9 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 30 3.3 10.0 56.7 30.0 3.1 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 16.7 62.5 20.8 3.0 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 0.0 75.9 24.1 3.2 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 0.0 63.3 36.7 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 68.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 450 401L1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jordan, Bradford ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 48.6 Junior 1 2.9 C 3 8.6 Senior 33 94.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 2.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 17.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 34.3 Required by my major 35 100.0 3 hours 10 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 7 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 0.0 63.9 36.1 3.4 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 13.9 66.7 19.4 3.1 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 0.0 80.6 19.4 3.2 0.40 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 14.3 68.6 17.1 3.0 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 77.1 22.9 3.2 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 11.1 5.6 52.8 30.6 3.0 0.91 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 5.9 14.7 52.9 26.5 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 31 3.2 12.9 67.7 16.1 3.0 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 11.4 68.6 20.0 3.1 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 2.9 8.6 74.3 14.3 3.0 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 36 2.8 11.1 77.8 8.3 2.9 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 11.5 76.9 11.5 3.0 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 0.0 82.9 17.1 3.2 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 0.0 82.9 17.1 3.2 0.38 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 2.9 71.4 25.7 3.2 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 8.6 62.9 28.6 3.2 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 8.3 55.6 36.1 3.3 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 58 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 62.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 450 002L1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jordan, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 54.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 40.9 Junior 1 4.5 C 1 4.5 Senior 21 95.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 27.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 22 100.0 3 hours 6 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 13.6 36.4 50.0 3.4 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 13.6 31.8 54.5 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 4.5 22.7 72.7 3.7 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 13.6 54.5 31.8 3.2 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 4.5 4.5 22.7 68.2 3.5 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 650 001L1 INVESTMENTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jordan, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 76.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 25 96.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.8 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 30.8 Required by my major 12 46.2 3 hours 7 26.9 Other (e.g. elective) 14 53.8 4 - 5 hours 7 26.9 6 - 7 hours 3 11.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 3.8 3.8 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 4.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 3.8 11.5 30.8 53.8 3.3 0.85 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 11.5 42.3 46.2 3.3 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 3.8 26.9 69.2 3.7 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 3.8 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 78.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FIN 360 001L1 PRINCIPLES REAL ESTATE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Malek, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 2 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 37.5 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 10.0 20.0 60.0 3.3 1.06 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 001L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 69.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 15.4 Junior 6 46.2 C 2 15.4 Senior 7 53.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 30.8 Studies Program 1 7.7 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 12 92.3 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 30.8 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 48.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 002L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 70.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 24.3 Junior 23 62.2 C 1 2.7 Senior 14 37.8 D 1 2.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 35.1 Studies Program 1 2.7 2 hours 12 32.4 Required by my major 35 94.6 3 hours 9 24.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.7 4 - 5 hours 2 5.4 6 - 7 hours 1 2.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 2.7 16.2 56.8 24.3 3.0 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 5.6 52.8 41.7 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 0.0 2.6 36.8 60.5 3.6 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 0.0 2.6 39.5 57.9 3.6 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 0.0 34.2 65.8 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 0.0 51.5 48.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 2.6 50.0 47.4 3.4 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 5.4 48.6 45.9 3.4 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 8.1 54.1 37.8 3.3 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 3.3 6.7 66.7 23.3 3.1 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 0.0 60.5 39.5 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 0.0 0.0 60.5 39.5 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 0.0 55.3 44.7 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 0.0 10.5 50.0 39.5 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 0.0 2.6 42.1 55.3 3.5 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 0.0 5.3 28.9 65.8 3.6 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 74.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 003L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 84.4 Sophomore 1 3.1 B 4 12.5 Junior 16 50.0 C 1 3.1 Senior 15 46.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 34.4 Studies Program 1 3.1 2 hours 14 43.8 Required by my major 31 96.9 3 hours 6 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 3.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 44.1 55.9 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 2.9 14.7 55.9 26.5 3.1 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 11.8 44.1 44.1 3.3 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 44.1 55.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 21.4 60.7 17.9 3.0 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 26.5 73.5 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 3.1 34.4 62.5 3.6 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 2.9 0.0 35.3 61.8 3.6 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 2.9 38.2 58.8 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 3.4 0.0 79.3 17.2 3.1 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 0.0 55.9 44.1 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 3.0 0.0 57.6 39.4 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 0.0 14.7 85.3 3.9 0.36. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 54 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 004L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.2 A 31 67.4 Sophomore 2 4.3 B 12 26.1 Junior 25 54.3 C 2 4.3 Senior 18 39.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 2.2 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 23 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 34.8 Required by my major 42 91.3 3 hours 5 10.9 Other (e.g. elective) 4 8.7 4 - 5 hours 2 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 50 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 52 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 0.0 1.9 36.5 61.5 3.6 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 0.0 1.9 42.3 55.8 3.5 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 52 0.0 1.9 51.9 46.2 3.4 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 52 0.0 1.9 50.0 48.1 3.5 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 47 2.1 27.7 51.1 19.1 2.9 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 0.0 1.9 42.3 55.8 3.5 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 44 0.0 0.0 52.3 47.7 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 0.0 0.0 36.5 63.5 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 52 0.0 1.9 48.1 50.0 3.5 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 50 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 2.3 6.8 52.3 38.6 3.3 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 0.0 5.8 51.9 42.3 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 52 0.0 3.8 55.8 40.4 3.4 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 52 0.0 1.9 46.2 51.9 3.5 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 1.9 9.6 53.8 34.6 3.2 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 52 0.0 5.8 30.8 63.5 3.6 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 52 0.0 3.8 23.1 73.1 3.7 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 54 Number of forms scanned = 52 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 96.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 005L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 72.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 27.8 Junior 14 73.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 26.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 61.1 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 17 94.4 3 hours 2 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 13.6 68.2 13.6 2.9 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 14.3 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 18.2 45.5 31.8 3.0 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 54 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 40.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 006L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 84.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 10.5 Junior 15 78.9 C 1 5.3 Senior 4 21.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 52.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 19 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 21.1 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 35.3 17.6 47.1 3.1 0.93 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 36.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 645 401L1 CORP INVEST & FIN POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 5.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 94.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 5.3 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 15.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 21.1 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 8 42.1 3 hours 4 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 10 52.6 4 - 5 hours 3 15.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 1 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 8.3 16.7 25.0 50.0 3.2 1.03 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 25.0 40.0 35.0 3.1 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 95.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 480 001L1 MONEY & CAPITAL MARKETS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peek, Joe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 22.2 Senior 10 100.0 D 1 11.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 3 hours 4 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 36.4 0.0 63.6 0.0 2.3 1.01 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 18.2 18.2 45.5 18.2 2.6 1.03 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 28.6 0.0 71.4 0.0 2.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 9.1 0.0 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 22.2 33.3 44.4 0.0 2.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 18.2 18.2 36.4 27.3 2.7 1.10 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 9.1 0.0 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.93 11. Was available for consultation 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 9.1 27.3 36.4 27.3 2.8 0.98 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 36.4 36.4 18.2 2.6 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 9.1 0.0 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 2.6 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 30.0 20.0 40.0 10.0 2.3 1.06. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 29.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 680 001L1 MONEY,INTEREST & CAPITAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peek, Joe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 30.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 2 18.2 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 9 81.8 4 - 5 hours 3 27.3 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 9.1 36.4 27.3 27.3 2.7 1.01 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 10.0 0.0 60.0 30.0 3.1 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 45.5 36.4 9.1 2.5 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 2.4 1.07 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 18.2 36.4 36.4 9.1 2.4 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 45.5 36.4 18.2 2.7 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BA 610 001L1 GLOBAL BUSINESS MANAGEMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holbein, Gordon ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 61.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 38.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 19 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 15.8 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 12 66.7 3 hours 7 36.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 27.8 4 - 5 hours 3 15.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 6.3 18.8 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 22.2 55.6 16.7 2.8 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 23.5 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 301 001L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Blanton, Jack C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 55.0 Sophomore 1 5.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 16 80.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 3 15.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 20.0 Required by my major 19 95.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 7 35.0 6 - 7 hours 5 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 23.8 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 9.5 33.3 42.9 14.3 2.6 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 23.8 52.4 23.8 3.0 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 23.8 52.4 19.0 2.9 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 19.0 47.6 33.3 3.1 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 611 401L1 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brass, Daniel ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 54.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 45.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 24 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 33.3 Required by my major 15 65.2 3 hours 4 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 8 34.8 4 - 5 hours 3 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 0.0 64.0 36.0 3.4 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 12.5 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 16.0 40.0 44.0 3.3 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 14.3 52.4 33.3 3.2 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 0.0 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 8.3 58.3 29.2 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 21.7 56.5 17.4 2.9 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 92.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 301 201L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Ralph C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 3 50.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 16.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 5 83.3 3 hours 3 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 28.6 14.3 57.1 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 58.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 697 401L1 TOP MANAGEMT LEADERSHIP IN CONTEMP BUS ENVIRONMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dess, Gregory G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 70.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 25.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 3.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 27 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.7 Studies Program 4 14.8 2 hours 6 22.2 Required by my major 23 85.2 3 hours 11 40.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 7 25.9 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 1 3.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 6.9 6.9 65.5 20.7 3.0 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 77.8 18.5 3.1 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 72.4 27.6 3.3 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 10.7 53.6 35.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 10.3 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 3.4 34.5 62.1 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 3.4 13.8 44.8 37.9 3.2 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 3.4 96.6 4.0 0.19 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 3.4 65.5 31.0 3.3 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 3.4 24.1 44.8 27.6 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 10.3 34.5 55.2 3.4 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 17.2 31.0 51.7 3.3 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 93.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 697 402L1 TOP MANAGEMT LEADERSHIP IN CONTEMP BUS ENVIRONMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dess, Gregory G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 21 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 15.0 2 hours 1 4.8 Required by my major 16 80.0 3 hours 10 47.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 8 38.1 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 1 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 9.1 31.8 54.5 3.4 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 4.5 31.8 63.6 3.6 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 18.2 27.3 50.0 3.2 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 4.8 14.3 33.3 47.6 3.2 0.89 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 4.8 9.5 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 9.1 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 4.3 34.8 56.5 3.4 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 4.3 26.1 65.2 3.5 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 85.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 700 001S1 ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dess, Gregory G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 16.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 66.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 3 50.0 8 or more hours 3 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 002L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 32.4 Sophomore 1 2.9 B 19 55.9 Junior 22 64.7 C 4 11.8 Senior 11 32.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 45.5 Studies Program 1 3.0 2 hours 10 30.3 Required by my major 22 66.7 3 hours 7 21.2 Other (e.g. elective) 10 30.3 4 - 5 hours 1 3.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 2.5 0.0 50.0 47.5 3.4 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 2.5 7.5 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 6.3 0.0 62.5 31.3 3.2 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 2.5 5.0 57.5 35.0 3.3 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 2.5 2.5 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 5.7 5.7 54.3 34.3 3.2 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 5.1 0.0 61.5 33.3 3.2 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 9.4 12.5 53.1 25.0 2.9 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 2.6 2.6 56.4 38.5 3.3 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 2.5 0.0 47.5 50.0 3.5 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 39 2.6 2.6 41.0 53.8 3.5 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 2.5 2.5 47.5 47.5 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 7.5 7.5 50.0 35.0 3.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 36 8.3 13.9 41.7 36.1 3.1 0.92 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 7.9 5.3 55.3 31.6 3.1 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 7.9 7.9 50.0 34.2 3.1 0.86 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 7.9 5.3 55.3 31.6 3.1 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 5.3 5.3 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 10.3 7.7 48.7 33.3 3.1 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 8.1 56.8 35.1 3.3 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 5.4 51.4 43.2 3.4 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 41 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 95.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 003L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 23.5 Sophomore 2 11.8 B 13 76.5 Junior 14 82.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 56.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 18.8 Required by my major 15 93.8 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 0.0 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 38.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 005L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 45.2 Sophomore 2 6.5 B 13 41.9 Junior 17 54.8 C 4 12.9 Senior 11 35.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 53.1 Studies Program 1 3.1 2 hours 7 21.9 Required by my major 30 93.8 3 hours 6 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.1 4 - 5 hours 2 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 78.4 21.6 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 8.3 63.9 27.8 3.2 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 3.4 10.3 65.5 20.7 3.0 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 5.4 67.6 27.0 3.2 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 2.7 62.2 35.1 3.3 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 6.5 71.0 22.6 3.2 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 5.7 65.7 28.6 3.2 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 7.4 22.2 51.9 18.5 2.8 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 8.1 64.9 27.0 3.2 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 56.8 43.2 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 0.0 78.1 21.9 3.2 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 5.4 70.3 24.3 3.2 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 16.2 64.9 18.9 3.0 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 35 2.9 34.3 45.7 17.1 2.8 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.41 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 2.7 70.3 27.0 3.2 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 8.3 13.9 63.9 13.9 2.8 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 8.1 62.2 29.7 3.2 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 8.1 62.2 29.7 3.2 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 86.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 006L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 35.3 Sophomore 5 14.7 B 18 52.9 Junior 22 64.7 C 4 11.8 Senior 7 20.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 23.5 Required by my major 32 94.1 3 hours 6 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.9 4 - 5 hours 3 8.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 0.0 7.9 73.7 18.4 3.1 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 2.6 0.0 55.3 42.1 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 5.4 45.9 48.6 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 11.1 22.2 37.0 29.6 2.9 0.99 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 2.6 2.6 44.7 50.0 3.4 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 2.6 0.0 39.5 57.9 3.5 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 2.9 44.1 52.9 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 2.7 48.6 48.6 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 2.6 15.8 36.8 44.7 3.2 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 35 2.9 31.4 45.7 20.0 2.8 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 19.4 55.6 25.0 3.1 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 0.0 13.5 56.8 29.7 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 2.8 13.9 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 5.6 25.0 50.0 19.4 2.8 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 8.3 52.8 38.9 3.3 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 2.8 8.3 36.1 52.8 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 86.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 007L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 30.8 Sophomore 3 7.7 B 21 53.8 Junior 28 71.8 C 5 12.8 Senior 8 20.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 53.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 20.5 Required by my major 36 92.3 3 hours 7 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 3 7.7 4 - 5 hours 3 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 2.6 71.8 25.6 3.2 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 2.5 7.5 77.5 12.5 3.0 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 2.9 85.7 11.4 3.1 0.37 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 2.5 80.0 17.5 3.2 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 0.0 10.0 72.5 17.5 3.1 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 16.2 73.0 10.8 2.9 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 0.0 18.8 65.6 15.6 3.0 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 0.0 2.5 80.0 17.5 3.2 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 81.6 18.4 3.2 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 5.1 74.4 20.5 3.2 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 7.5 7.5 75.0 10.0 2.9 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 39 7.7 17.9 64.1 10.3 2.8 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 40 2.5 12.5 67.5 17.5 3.0 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 2.5 7.5 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 2.6 10.3 71.8 15.4 3.0 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 2.5 75.0 22.5 3.2 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 2.9 20.0 65.7 11.4 2.9 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 15.0 72.5 12.5 3.0 0.53 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 5.0 7.5 65.0 22.5 3.1 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 93.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 008L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 45.2 Sophomore 5 15.6 B 15 48.4 Junior 20 62.5 C 2 6.5 Senior 7 21.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 38.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 32.3 Required by my major 27 84.4 3 hours 8 25.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 15.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 3.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 2.8 61.1 36.1 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 8.3 69.4 22.2 3.1 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 16.7 70.0 13.3 3.0 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 5.6 63.9 30.6 3.3 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 2.9 2.9 54.3 40.0 3.3 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 11.1 52.8 36.1 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 8.3 13.9 47.2 30.6 3.0 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 33 6.1 33.3 45.5 15.2 2.7 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 12.5 59.4 28.1 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 8.3 63.9 27.8 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 8.6 68.6 22.9 3.1 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 2.8 69.4 27.8 3.3 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 2.8 19.4 52.8 25.0 3.0 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 5.6 8.3 66.7 19.4 3.0 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 009L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 45.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 16 51.6 Junior 27 87.1 C 1 3.2 Senior 4 12.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 54.8 Studies Program 2 6.5 2 hours 14 45.2 Required by my major 27 87.1 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 59.4 40.6 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 9.7 74.2 16.1 3.1 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 11.5 80.8 7.7 3.0 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 0.0 65.6 34.4 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 3.1 65.6 31.3 3.3 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 4.2 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 64.5 35.5 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 13.6 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 3.1 62.5 34.4 3.3 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 67.7 32.3 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 61.3 38.7 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 6.3 71.9 21.9 3.2 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 10.7 71.4 17.9 3.1 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 6.5 77.4 16.1 3.1 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 13.3 70.0 16.7 3.0 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 3.1 75.0 21.9 3.2 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 22.6 61.3 16.1 2.9 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 3.2 71.0 25.8 3.2 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 9.7 58.1 32.3 3.2 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 74.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 010L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 58.8 Junior 11 61.1 C 1 5.9 Senior 7 38.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 41.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 3 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 23.8 38.1 38.1 3.1 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 28.6 19.0 47.6 3.1 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 10.0 30.0 15.0 45.0 3.0 1.10 14. Encouraged class participation 19 10.5 21.1 26.3 42.1 3.0 1.05 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 5.6 50.0 38.9 3.2 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 5.0 10.0 45.0 40.0 3.2 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 25.0 35.0 30.0 2.9 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 35.0 25.0 40.0 3.1 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 5.0 35.0 5.0 55.0 3.1 1.07. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 47.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 011L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 62.5 Junior 5 62.5 C 1 12.5 Senior 3 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 25.0 Studies Program 1 12.5 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 5 62.5 3 hours 4 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 25.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 20.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 340 001L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Freeman, J W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 31 79.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 20.5 Junior 9 23.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 30 76.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 26 66.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 25.6 Required by my major 39 100.0 3 hours 1 2.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 2.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 43 0.0 2.3 53.5 44.2 3.4 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 7.3 22.0 56.1 14.6 2.8 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 0.0 10.3 71.8 17.9 3.1 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 0.0 0.0 65.1 34.9 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 43 0.0 9.3 55.8 34.9 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 7.5 10.0 55.0 27.5 3.0 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 0.0 23.1 56.4 20.5 3.0 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 0.0 9.3 46.5 44.2 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 43 0.0 0.0 23.3 76.7 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 2.7 62.2 35.1 3.3 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 4.7 51.2 44.2 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 2.3 2.3 55.8 39.5 3.3 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 43 2.3 7.0 55.8 34.9 3.2 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 37 0.0 5.4 70.3 24.3 3.2 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 42 0.0 9.5 73.8 16.7 3.1 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 2.4 0.0 66.7 31.0 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 5.0 17.5 55.0 22.5 3.0 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 0.0 11.6 44.2 44.2 3.3 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 43 0.0 4.7 39.5 55.8 3.5 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 62 Number of forms scanned = 43 Number of forms with at least one student response = 43 Percent completed = 69.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 340 002L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Freeman, J W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 31 79.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 20.5 Junior 15 38.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 24 61.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 53.8 Studies Program 1 2.6 2 hours 15 38.5 Required by my major 38 97.4 3 hours 1 2.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 2.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 4.9 43.9 51.2 3.5 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 5.0 15.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 0.0 0.0 57.5 42.5 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 0.0 0.0 46.3 53.7 3.5 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 2.4 46.3 51.2 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 2.4 56.1 41.5 3.4 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 0.0 12.5 57.5 30.0 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 0.0 2.4 29.3 68.3 3.7 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 12.2 87.8 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 40 0.0 0.0 52.5 47.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 0.0 2.4 31.7 65.9 3.6 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 41 0.0 7.3 39.0 53.7 3.5 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 0.0 2.6 56.4 41.0 3.4 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 2.5 52.5 45.0 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 5.1 53.8 41.0 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 0.0 53.7 46.3 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 0.0 4.9 53.7 41.5 3.4 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 0.0 4.9 41.5 53.7 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 41 0.0 2.4 26.8 70.7 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 62 Number of forms scanned = 41 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 66.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 340 402L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Freeman, J W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 18.2 Junior 12 36.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 21 63.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 53.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 31.3 Required by my major 32 97.0 3 hours 5 15.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 6.5 12.9 29.0 51.6 3.3 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 2.9 51.4 45.7 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 2.9 0.0 45.7 51.4 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 3.3 3.3 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 8.6 45.7 45.7 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 11.8 38.2 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 2.9 48.6 48.6 3.5 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 56.3 40.6 3.4 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 3.0 57.6 39.4 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 0.0 14.7 47.1 38.2 3.2 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 5.7 42.9 51.4 3.5 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 2.9 37.1 60.0 3.6 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 390 001L1 SPEC TOPS IN MGMT:INTRO TO CONSULTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoffmann, Bronwyn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 13.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 53.3 Required by my major 6 40.0 3 hours 5 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 9 60.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 88.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 390 401L1 SPEC TOPS IN MGMT:INTRO TO CONSULTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoffmann, Bronwyn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 57.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 95.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 31.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 9 45.0 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 11 55.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 4.5 0.0 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 9.1 0.0 40.9 50.0 3.3 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 4.5 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 4.5 0.0 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 0.0 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 4.5 0.0 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 4.5 0.0 31.8 63.6 3.5 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 5.3 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 0.0 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 4.5 0.0 13.6 81.8 3.7 0.70 11. Was available for consultation 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 4.5 0.0 22.7 72.7 3.6 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 0.0 33.3 61.9 3.5 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 0.0 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 5.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 4.5 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 4.8 4.8 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 4.5 0.0 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 9.5 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 491 001L1 SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoffmann, Bronwyn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 14 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 11 78.6 3 hours 7 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 21.4 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 13.3 26.7 60.0 3.5 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 88.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 491 002L1 SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoffmann, Bronwyn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 82.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 17.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 16 94.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 10 58.8 3 hours 6 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 41.2 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 2 11.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 5.6 50.0 38.9 3.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 5.3 89.5 3.8 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 499 005L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holbein, Gordon ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 65.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 34.5 Junior 1 3.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 30 96.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 37.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 37.9 Required by my major 29 100.0 3 hours 5 17.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 3.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 3.1 0.0 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 6.5 54.8 38.7 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 3.1 3.1 59.4 34.4 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 0.0 65.6 34.4 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 3.1 0.0 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 3.1 37.5 59.4 3.6 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 9.4 43.8 46.9 3.4 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 18.8 34.4 46.9 3.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 6.3 21.9 71.9 3.7 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 320 001L1 SURVEY OF PERSONNEL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jarley, Paul ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 48.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 48.1 Junior 5 18.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 22 81.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 66.7 Studies Program 1 3.7 2 hours 6 22.2 Required by my major 25 92.6 3 hours 3 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 3.7 29.6 55.6 11.1 2.7 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 14.3 67.9 17.9 3.0 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 0.0 44.8 55.2 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 71.4 25.0 3.2 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 3.8 34.6 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 6.9 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 27.6 72.4 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 17.2 58.6 24.1 3.1 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 10.3 48.3 41.4 3.3 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 14.8 74.1 11.1 3.0 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 13.8 65.5 20.7 3.1 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 17.2 72.4 10.3 2.9 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 3.6 32.1 60.7 3.6 2.6 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 3.4 37.9 58.6 3.6 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 87.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 320 002L1 SURVEY OF PERSONNEL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jarley, Paul ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 37.1 Junior 6 17.1 C 1 2.9 Senior 29 82.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 37.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 34.3 Required by my major 32 91.4 3 hours 9 25.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 8.6 4 - 5 hours 1 2.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 56.8 43.2 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 19.4 19.4 41.7 19.4 2.6 1.02 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 2.8 2.8 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 0.0 45.9 54.1 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 3.0 54.5 42.4 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 0.0 40.5 59.5 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 24.3 75.7 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 2.7 37.8 59.5 3.6 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 13.5 43.2 43.2 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 37 0.0 0.0 73.0 27.0 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 0.0 10.8 56.8 32.4 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 8.1 64.9 27.0 3.2 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 2.7 21.6 48.6 27.0 3.0 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 5.4 48.6 45.9 3.4 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 2.7 27.0 70.3 3.7 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 67.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 320 003L1 SURVEY OF PERSONNEL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Nancy B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 35.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 24 60.0 Junior 11 26.8 C 2 5.0 Senior 30 73.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 36.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 39.0 Required by my major 39 95.1 3 hours 7 17.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 4.9 4 - 5 hours 3 7.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 2.4 48.8 48.8 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 2.4 75.6 22.0 3.2 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 0.0 4.9 61.0 34.1 3.3 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 0.0 53.7 46.3 3.5 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 0.0 61.0 39.0 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 0.0 48.8 51.2 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 0.0 31.6 52.6 15.8 2.8 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 2.4 17.1 48.8 31.7 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 51.2 48.8 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 0.0 58.5 41.5 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 7.3 12.2 48.8 31.7 3.0 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 41 4.9 2.4 53.7 39.0 3.3 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 13.2 65.8 21.1 3.1 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 0.0 9.8 63.4 26.8 3.2 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 2.4 12.2 63.4 22.0 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 0.0 70.7 29.3 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 7.5 25.0 57.5 10.0 2.7 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 0.0 17.1 56.1 26.8 3.1 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 41 0.0 22.0 36.6 41.5 3.2 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 41 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 87.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 422 001L1 WAGE & SALARY ADMIN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Nancy B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 43.3 Junior 1 3.2 C 1 3.3 Senior 30 96.8 D 1 3.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 48.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 35.5 Required by my major 19 63.3 3 hours 2 6.5 Other (e.g. elective) 11 36.7 4 - 5 hours 1 3.2 6 - 7 hours 1 3.2 8 or more hours 1 3.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 2.9 68.6 28.6 3.3 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 8.6 54.3 28.6 8.6 2.4 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 2.9 14.7 67.6 14.7 2.9 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 2.9 0.0 71.4 25.7 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 14.3 60.0 25.7 3.1 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 5.9 73.5 20.6 3.1 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 77.1 22.9 3.2 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 28.6 60.0 11.4 2.8 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 2.9 11.4 68.6 17.1 3.0 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 3.3 70.0 26.7 3.2 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 5.7 68.6 25.7 3.2 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 5.7 20.0 65.7 8.6 2.8 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 5.7 54.3 40.0 3.3 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 6.7 6.7 70.0 16.7 3.0 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 3.0 6.1 75.8 15.2 3.0 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 3.0 9.1 72.7 15.2 3.0 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 2.9 73.5 23.5 3.2 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 5.9 35.3 50.0 8.8 2.6 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 2.9 11.4 60.0 25.7 3.1 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 5.7 8.6 48.6 37.1 3.2 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 499 001L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lockhart, Daniel E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 61.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 38.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 26 96.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 14.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 37.0 Required by my major 27 100.0 3 hours 6 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 18.5 6 - 7 hours 2 7.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 18.5 48.1 33.3 3.1 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 7.4 55.6 37.0 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 7.4 59.3 33.3 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 3.7 7.4 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 11.1 40.7 48.1 3.4 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 18.5 48.1 33.3 3.1 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 3.7 66.7 29.6 3.3 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 7.4 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 3.8 23.1 57.7 15.4 2.8 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 499 002L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lockhart, Daniel E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 82.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 17.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 24 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 29.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 29.2 Required by my major 24 100.0 3 hours 9 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 4.0 16.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 8.0 20.0 52.0 20.0 2.8 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 68.0 32.0 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 68.0 32.0 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 72.0 28.0 3.3 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 16.0 12.0 44.0 28.0 2.8 1.03 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 70.8 29.2 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 12.5 12.5 54.2 20.8 2.8 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 4.0 4.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 8.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 4.0 4.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 12.5 12.5 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 16.0 52.0 28.0 3.0 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 12.5 54.2 29.2 3.1 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 80.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 499 401L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lockhart, Daniel E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 65.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 28.1 Junior 2 6.3 C 2 6.3 Senior 30 93.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 18.8 Studies Program 2 6.3 2 hours 10 31.3 Required by my major 30 93.8 3 hours 7 21.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 7 21.9 6 - 7 hours 1 3.1 8 or more hours 1 3.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 15.6 40.6 43.8 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 9.4 50.0 40.6 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 15.6 40.6 43.8 3.3 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 6.5 41.9 51.6 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 9.4 50.0 40.6 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 15.6 43.8 40.6 3.3 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 3.1 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 9.4 50.0 40.6 3.3 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 18.8 40.6 40.6 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 13.8 48.3 37.9 3.2 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 9.4 53.1 37.5 3.3 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 9.4 53.1 37.5 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 9.4 43.8 46.9 3.4 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 699 401L1 BUS POLICY/STRATEGY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lockhart, Daniel E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 93.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 6.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 15 93.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 6.3 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 12.5 2 hours 3 18.8 Required by my major 14 87.5 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 25.0 6 - 7 hours 5 31.3 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 341 401L1 BUSINESS LAW I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Myers, Larry W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 22.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 63.6 Junior 2 9.1 C 1 4.5 Senior 19 86.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 9.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 45.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 31.8 Required by my major 13 59.1 3 hours 1 4.5 Other (e.g. elective) 9 40.9 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 2 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 31.6 47.4 21.1 2.9 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 4.3 8.7 56.5 30.4 3.1 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 13.0 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 4.3 56.5 34.8 3.2 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 8.7 34.8 56.5 3.5 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 13.0 47.8 39.1 3.3 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 44.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 492 001L1 ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND VENTURE CREATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Parker, Larry ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 69.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 23.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 7.7 Senior 13 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 53.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 7 53.8 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 46.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 2.8 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 30.8 61.5 7.7 2.8 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 12.5 25.0 62.5 0.0 2.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 37.5 25.0 37.5 0.0 2.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 7.1 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 7.1 50.0 28.6 2.9 1.00 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 340 003L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Payne, Gary D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 65.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 28.6 Junior 15 42.9 C 2 5.7 Senior 20 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 60.0 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 10 28.6 Required by my major 32 91.4 3 hours 2 5.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.7 4 - 5 hours 2 5.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 8.6 45.7 45.7 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 25.0 33.3 37.5 3.0 0.91 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 2.8 2.8 47.2 47.2 3.4 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 2.8 38.9 58.3 3.6 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 2.9 35.3 61.8 3.6 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 3.8 26.9 42.3 26.9 2.9 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 32 3.1 3.1 59.4 34.4 3.3 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 5.7 54.3 40.0 3.3 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 8.3 63.9 27.8 3.2 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 12.1 57.6 30.3 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 5.7 68.6 25.7 3.2 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 69.4 30.6 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 0.0 27.8 55.6 16.7 2.9 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 61 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 59.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 340 401L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Payne, Gary D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 68.4 Sophomore 1 2.6 B 11 28.9 Junior 25 65.8 C 1 2.6 Senior 12 31.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 52.6 Studies Program 1 2.6 2 hours 8 21.1 Required by my major 36 94.7 3 hours 8 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.6 4 - 5 hours 2 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 0.0 5.1 46.2 48.7 3.4 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 10.3 55.2 34.5 3.2 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 0.0 0.0 43.6 56.4 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 0.0 0.0 43.6 56.4 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 0.0 43.6 56.4 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 14.3 60.7 25.0 3.1 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 0.0 28.2 71.8 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 20.5 79.5 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 0.0 5.1 41.0 53.8 3.5 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 38 0.0 2.6 55.3 42.1 3.4 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 0.0 5.1 64.1 30.8 3.3 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 0.0 2.6 66.7 30.8 3.3 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 2.8 69.4 27.8 3.3 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 0.0 0.0 48.7 51.3 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 62 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 62.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 410 003L1 ANALYSIS ORGANIZA BEHAV INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shaw, Jason ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 27.8 Junior 2 11.1 C 4 22.2 Senior 16 88.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 44.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 1 5.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 3 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 5.6 11.1 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 33.3 50.0 11.1 2.7 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 33.3 55.6 5.6 2.6 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 16.7 27.8 44.4 11.1 2.5 0.92 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 11.8 17.6 58.8 11.8 2.7 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 11.1 16.7 61.1 11.1 2.7 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 11.1 44.4 38.9 5.6 2.4 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 27.8 16.7 38.9 16.7 2.4 1.10 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 5.6 11.1 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.77 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 11.1 5.6 72.2 11.1 2.8 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 11.1 38.9 44.4 5.6 2.4 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 17 17.6 23.5 52.9 5.9 2.5 0.87 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 23.5 23.5 47.1 5.9 2.4 0.93 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 11.8 11.8 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 23.5 23.5 47.1 5.9 2.4 0.93 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 11.1 22.2 61.1 5.6 2.6 0.78 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 18.8 43.8 37.5 0.0 2.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 23.5 17.6 47.1 11.8 2.5 1.01 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 23.5 29.4 35.3 11.8 2.4 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 51.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 410 401L1 ANALYSIS ORGANIZA BEHAV INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shaw, Jason ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 50.0 Junior 2 6.7 C 1 3.3 Senior 25 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 10.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 56.7 Required by my major 26 86.7 3 hours 2 6.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 13.3 4 - 5 hours 1 3.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 64.5 35.5 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 6.9 10.3 44.8 37.9 3.1 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 6.5 64.5 29.0 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 22.6 54.8 22.6 3.0 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 3.2 64.5 32.3 3.3 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 9.7 64.5 25.8 3.2 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 3.3 13.3 46.7 36.7 3.2 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 3.2 3.2 54.8 38.7 3.3 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 72.0 28.0 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 64.5 35.5 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 3.2 12.9 64.5 19.4 3.0 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 31 3.2 12.9 58.1 25.8 3.1 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 65.5 27.6 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 6.9 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 3.6 3.6 60.7 32.1 3.2 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 3.2 67.7 29.0 3.3 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 20.0 56.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 6.9 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 3.6 3.6 46.4 46.4 3.4 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 88.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 499 003L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skaggs, Bruce ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 21.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 23 71.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 6.3 Senior 32 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.1 Studies Program 2 6.5 2 hours 11 34.4 Required by my major 29 93.5 3 hours 16 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 0.0 15.2 51.5 33.3 3.2 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 6.1 48.5 45.5 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 6.1 48.5 45.5 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 6.1 42.4 51.5 3.5 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 22.6 41.9 35.5 3.1 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 6.1 33.3 60.6 3.5 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 0.0 0.0 39.4 60.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 3.0 45.5 51.5 3.5 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 0.0 48.5 51.5 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 3.2 61.3 35.5 3.3 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 9.4 56.3 34.4 3.3 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 3.1 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 3.1 21.9 75.0 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 499 004L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skaggs, Bruce ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 26.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 19 73.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 26 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 15.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 38.5 Required by my major 25 96.2 3 hours 8 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.8 4 - 5 hours 4 15.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 8.0 72.0 20.0 3.1 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 0.0 80.8 19.2 3.2 0.40 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 3.8 65.4 30.8 3.3 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 23.1 42.3 34.6 3.1 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 435 001L1 INTERNATIONAL MARKETING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dahlstrom, Robert F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 35.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 60.7 Junior 1 3.6 C 1 3.6 Senior 27 96.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 35.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 53.6 Required by my major 22 78.6 3 hours 2 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 21.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 3.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 10.3 75.9 13.8 3.0 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 13.8 69.0 17.2 3.0 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 6.9 75.9 17.2 3.1 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 6.9 75.9 13.8 3.0 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 0.0 72.4 27.6 3.3 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 0.0 69.0 31.0 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 3.4 6.9 72.4 17.2 3.0 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 72.4 27.6 3.3 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 76.0 20.0 3.2 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 7.1 75.0 17.9 3.1 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 3.6 64.3 32.1 3.3 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 3.6 3.6 78.6 14.3 3.0 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 6.9 72.4 20.7 3.1 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 59.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 624 001L1 INTERNATL MKT MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dahlstrom, Robert F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 82.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 17.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 17 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 10 58.8 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 7 41.2 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 11.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 27.8 44.4 27.8 3.0 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 300 001L1 MARKETING MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Donnelly, James H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 77 35.6 Sophomore 45 20.5 B 125 57.9 Junior 135 61.6 C 13 6.0 Senior 38 17.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 0.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 89 41.6 Studies Program 3 1.4 2 hours 70 32.7 Required by my major 186 86.1 3 hours 41 19.2 Other (e.g. elective) 27 12.5 4 - 5 hours 12 5.6 6 - 7 hours 2 0.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 238 0.8 0.4 29.4 69.3 3.7 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 238 0.8 2.5 47.1 49.6 3.5 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 201 1.5 5.0 45.3 48.3 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 238 1.3 3.4 44.1 51.3 3.5 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 237 0.8 0.8 37.1 61.2 3.6 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 184 1.6 4.3 39.7 54.3 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 228 0.9 0.9 28.5 69.7 3.7 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 146 2.7 11.6 34.2 51.4 3.3 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 238 1.3 0.4 19.3 79.0 3.8 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 238 0.8 0.0 11.8 87.4 3.9 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 230 0.9 0.4 17.0 81.7 3.8 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 238 0.8 0.4 17.6 81.1 3.8 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 238 0.8 2.1 19.3 77.7 3.7 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 238 0.8 1.3 18.9 79.0 3.8 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 213 0.9 3.8 39.9 55.4 3.5 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 231 0.9 2.6 41.6 55.0 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 225 0.9 4.0 44.0 51.1 3.5 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 234 0.9 0.9 37.2 61.1 3.6 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 227 1.3 12.8 37.0 48.9 3.3 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 235 0.0 3.0 29.8 67.2 3.6 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 235 0.0 0.9 14.9 84.3 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 655 Number of forms scanned = 242 Number of forms with at least one student response = 239 Percent completed = 36.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 450 001L1 MKT STRATEGY & PLANNING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Donnelly, James H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 87.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 12.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 24 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 29.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 58.3 Required by my major 21 87.5 3 hours 3 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 12.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 4.2 95.8 4.0 0.20 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 0.0 4.3 95.7 4.0 0.21 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 4.2 95.8 4.0 0.20 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 0.0 8.7 91.3 3.9 0.29 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 0.0 4.2 95.8 4.0 0.20 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 73.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 410 001L1 PERSONAL SELLING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gassenheimer, Jule B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 45.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 50.0 Junior 2 9.1 C 1 4.5 Senior 20 90.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 13.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 17 77.3 3 hours 9 40.9 Other (e.g. elective) 5 22.7 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 19.2 50.0 30.8 3.1 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 11.1 48.1 40.7 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 22.2 37.0 40.7 3.2 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 7.4 44.4 48.1 3.4 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 14.8 37.0 48.1 3.3 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 0.0 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 0.0 45.8 50.0 3.4 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 7.4 37.0 55.6 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 622 401L1 SALES MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gassenheimer, Jule B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 7 63.6 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 36.4 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 390 001L1 SPEC TOPS MKT:SPORTS MARKETING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kelley, Scott W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 33 71.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 26.1 Junior 9 19.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 37 80.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 23 50.0 Studies Program 1 2.2 2 hours 14 30.4 Required by my major 29 63.0 3 hours 7 15.2 Other (e.g. elective) 16 34.8 4 - 5 hours 2 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 48 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 2.4 4.8 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 48 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 48 0.0 2.1 52.1 45.8 3.4 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 0.0 0.0 52.1 47.9 3.5 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 47 0.0 0.0 46.8 53.2 3.5 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 2.1 47.9 50.0 3.5 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 48 0.0 2.1 45.8 52.1 3.5 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 48 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 48 0.0 0.0 27.1 72.9 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 47 0.0 0.0 55.3 44.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 48 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 0.0 2.1 37.5 60.4 3.6 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 48 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 45 2.2 4.4 64.4 28.9 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 45 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 0.0 0.0 58.7 41.3 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 0.0 2.2 50.0 47.8 3.5 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 48 2.1 0.0 35.4 62.5 3.6 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 48 0.0 2.1 29.2 68.8 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 48 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 390 002L1 SPEC TOPS MKT:SPORTS MARKETING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kelley, Scott W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 30 68.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 31.8 Junior 2 4.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 42 95.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 23 52.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 36.4 Required by my major 26 59.1 3 hours 2 4.5 Other (e.g. elective) 18 40.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 2.3 8 or more hours 2 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 45 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 5.3 5.3 44.7 44.7 3.3 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 45 0.0 0.0 57.8 42.2 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 0.0 4.4 44.4 51.1 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 2.2 6.7 40.0 51.1 3.4 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 45 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 45 0.0 0.0 51.1 48.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 45 0.0 4.4 48.9 46.7 3.4 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 45 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 45 0.0 2.2 26.7 71.1 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 43 0.0 0.0 37.2 62.8 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 0.0 0.0 28.9 71.1 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 45 0.0 2.2 33.3 64.4 3.6 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 45 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 0.0 2.3 54.5 43.2 3.4 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 44 0.0 2.3 54.5 43.2 3.4 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 0.0 9.5 54.8 35.7 3.3 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 45 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 0.0 4.4 35.6 60.0 3.6 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 0.0 4.5 43.2 52.3 3.5 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 0.0 2.3 27.3 70.5 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 45 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 450 004L1 MKT STRATEGY & PLANNING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Morgan, Fred W. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 62.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 37.5 Junior 1 6.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 93.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 37.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 12.5 Required by my major 16 100.0 3 hours 6 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 12.5 6.3 75.0 6.3 2.8 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 29.4 58.8 11.8 2.8 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 82.4 5.9 2.9 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 5.9 0.0 29.4 64.7 3.5 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 17.6 76.5 3.7 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 390 401L1 SPEC TOP MKT:FRANCHISING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Scott, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 25.0 Junior 2 6.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 27 93.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 60.7 Studies Program 1 3.7 2 hours 6 21.4 Required by my major 13 48.1 3 hours 2 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 13 48.1 4 - 5 hours 1 3.6 6 - 7 hours 1 3.6 8 or more hours 1 3.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 3.3 0.0 46.7 50.0 3.4 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 3.3 0.0 33.3 63.3 3.6 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 3.3 0.0 36.7 60.0 3.5 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 3.3 0.0 40.0 56.7 3.5 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 13.8 41.4 44.8 3.3 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 3.3 0.0 30.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 3.3 0.0 10.0 86.7 3.8 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 3.3 0.0 30.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 3.3 0.0 23.3 73.3 3.7 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 30 3.3 0.0 26.7 70.0 3.6 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 0.0 39.3 60.7 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 3.4 0.0 27.6 69.0 3.6 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 3.3 6.7 36.7 53.3 3.4 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 3.3 0.0 33.3 63.3 3.6 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 3.3 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 65.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 450 002L1 MKT STRATEGY & PLANNING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skinner, Steven J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 26 96.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 44.4 Required by my major 25 96.2 3 hours 5 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.8 4 - 5 hours 1 3.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 63.0 37.0 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 7.4 44.4 48.1 3.4 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 14.8 66.7 18.5 3.0 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 68.0 24.0 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 3.7 70.4 25.9 3.2 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 14.8 66.7 18.5 3.0 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 7.4 59.3 33.3 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 25.9 55.6 18.5 2.9 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 18.5 51.9 29.6 3.1 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 22.2 25.9 51.9 3.3 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 79.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 450 003L1 MKT STRATEGY & PLANNING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skinner, Steven J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 36.4 Junior 1 4.5 C 1 4.5 Senior 21 95.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 54.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 31.8 Required by my major 22 100.0 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 8.3 29.2 62.5 3.5 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 8.3 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 4.5 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 13.0 65.2 21.7 3.1 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 13.0 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 4.2 16.7 75.0 3.6 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 330 001L1 PROMOTION MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Valerie A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 44.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 52.0 Junior 1 4.0 C 1 4.0 Senior 24 96.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 28.0 Studies Program 1 4.0 2 hours 9 36.0 Required by my major 19 76.0 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 76.0 24.0 3.2 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 0.0 64.0 32.0 3.2 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 4.0 0.0 56.0 40.0 3.3 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 4.0 0.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 8.0 72.0 20.0 3.1 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 4.0 64.0 32.0 3.3 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 68.0 32.0 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 16.0 56.0 28.0 3.1 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 24.0 60.0 16.0 2.9 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 4.0 8.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 330 002L1 PROMOTION MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Valerie A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 41.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 19 55.9 Junior 2 5.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 32 94.1 D 1 2.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 38.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 47.1 Required by my major 24 70.6 3 hours 4 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 10 29.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 2.9 35.3 61.8 3.6 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 18.5 7.4 37.0 37.0 2.9 1.11 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 3.0 0.0 66.7 30.3 3.2 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 14.7 47.1 38.2 3.2 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 2.9 47.1 50.0 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 8.8 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 3.0 6.1 39.4 51.5 3.4 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 3.0 0.0 45.5 51.5 3.5 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 32 3.1 0.0 56.3 40.6 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 3.0 3.0 36.4 57.6 3.5 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 6.5 0.0 51.6 41.9 3.3 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 33 3.0 0.0 45.5 51.5 3.5 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 59.4 37.5 3.3 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 3.0 51.5 45.5 3.4 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 2.9 47.1 50.0 3.5 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 3.0 15.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 2.9 0.0 58.8 38.2 3.3 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 3.0 6.1 51.5 39.4 3.3 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 70.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 340 001L1 INTRO MARKETING RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Tepper, Kelly L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 33 82.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 15.0 Junior 1 2.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 38 95.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 67.5 Studies Program 1 2.5 2 hours 8 20.0 Required by my major 38 95.0 3 hours 3 7.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.5 4 - 5 hours 1 2.5 6 - 7 hours 1 2.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 43 0.0 0.0 46.5 53.5 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 2.4 53.7 43.9 3.4 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 43 2.3 0.0 44.2 53.5 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 0.0 2.6 56.4 41.0 3.4 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 0.0 34.1 65.9 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 3.3 20.0 56.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 0.0 4.7 46.5 48.8 3.4 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 43 0.0 0.0 30.2 69.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 41 0.0 2.4 51.2 46.3 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 2.3 44.2 53.5 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 2.4 2.4 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 43 0.0 4.7 34.9 60.5 3.6 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 37 2.7 8.1 54.1 35.1 3.2 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 43 2.3 0.0 46.5 51.2 3.5 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 2.4 4.8 47.6 45.2 3.4 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 2.3 0.0 48.8 48.8 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 43 2.3 11.6 51.2 34.9 3.2 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 2.3 0.0 41.9 55.8 3.5 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 43 2.3 0.0 34.9 62.8 3.6 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 43 Percent completed = 86.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 340 002L1 INTRO MARKETING RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Tepper, Kelly L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 85.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 14.8 Junior 1 3.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 25 96.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 51.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 40.7 Required by my major 27 100.0 3 hours 2 7.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 2.9 52.9 44.1 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 6.1 39.4 54.5 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 2.9 50.0 47.1 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 0.0 26.5 73.5 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 6.1 42.4 51.5 3.5 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 0.0 11.8 50.0 38.2 3.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 2.9 41.2 55.9 3.5 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 2.9 14.7 82.4 3.8 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 68.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 310 001L1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whittler, Tommy E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 48.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 48.4 Junior 10 31.3 C 1 3.2 Senior 22 68.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 21.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 31.3 Required by my major 31 96.9 3 hours 12 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.1 4 - 5 hours 3 9.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 6.3 12.5 53.1 28.1 3.0 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 3.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 5.9 44.1 50.0 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 3.0 51.5 45.5 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 0.0 2.9 38.2 58.8 3.6 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 2.9 23.5 73.5 3.7 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 2.9 29.4 67.6 3.6 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 0.0 42.4 57.6 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 6.5 48.4 45.2 3.4 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 9.4 43.8 46.9 3.4 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 2.9 38.2 58.8 3.6 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 82.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 310 002L1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whittler, Tommy E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 51.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 33.3 Junior 22 66.7 C 5 15.2 Senior 11 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 51.5 Required by my major 30 90.9 3 hours 12 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 9.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 2.9 62.9 34.3 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 2.9 45.7 51.4 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 0.0 34.3 65.7 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 17.1 82.9 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 2.9 32.4 64.7 3.6 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 0.0 37.1 62.9 3.6 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 2.9 71.4 25.7 3.2 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 0.0 68.6 31.4 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 2.9 68.6 28.6 3.3 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 2.9 57.1 40.0 3.4 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 0.0 34.3 65.7 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 2.9 22.9 74.3 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 85.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 301 001L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chandra, Uday ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 70.0 Junior 7 77.8 C 1 10.0 Senior 2 22.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 10 100.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 6 60.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 10.0 0.0 30.0 60.0 3.4 0.97 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 301 002L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chandra, Uday ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 46.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 34.6 Junior 19 73.1 C 5 19.2 Senior 7 26.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 34.6 Required by my major 25 96.2 3 hours 5 19.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.8 4 - 5 hours 8 30.8 6 - 7 hours 3 11.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 7.7 11.5 61.5 19.2 2.9 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 3.8 3.8 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 8.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 11.5 61.5 26.9 3.2 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 23.1 46.2 26.9 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 15.0 55.0 25.0 3.0 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 34.6 38.5 26.9 2.9 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 78.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 302 001L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Myrtle W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 42.9 Junior 2 14.3 C 3 21.4 Senior 12 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 14 100.0 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 28.6 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 35.7 57.1 0.0 2.5 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 35.7 57.1 7.1 2.7 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 7.7 15.4 76.9 0.0 2.7 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 2.8 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 601 001S1 RESEARCH IN ACC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Myrtle W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 90.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 10.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 5 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 3 27.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 27.3 27.3 45.5 3.2 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 208 001L1 CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Jean ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 92.9 Sophomore 1 3.6 B 1 3.6 Junior 19 67.9 C 1 3.6 Senior 8 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 17.9 Required by my major 28 100.0 3 hours 9 32.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 7 25.0 6 - 7 hours 5 17.9 8 or more hours 2 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 3.0 9.1 45.5 42.4 3.3 0.76 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 3.1 6.3 59.4 31.3 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 3.0 57.6 39.4 3.4 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 6.1 12.1 48.5 33.3 3.1 0.84 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 9.4 62.5 28.1 3.2 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 3.0 21.2 48.5 27.3 3.0 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 6.1 3.0 66.7 24.2 3.1 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 3.0 54.5 42.4 3.4 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 3.0 6.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 3.0 21.2 54.5 21.2 2.9 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 6.1 63.6 30.3 3.2 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 16.1 61.3 22.6 3.1 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 3.0 75.8 21.2 3.2 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 6.1 69.7 24.2 3.2 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 0.0 9.1 69.7 21.2 3.1 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 34.4 40.6 25.0 2.9 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 6.1 9.1 54.5 30.3 3.1 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 3.1 12.5 59.4 25.0 3.1 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 94.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 208 002L1 CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Jean ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 22 91.7 Sophomore 9 37.5 B 2 8.3 Junior 14 58.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 4.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 37.5 Required by my major 24 100.0 3 hours 8 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 3.4 3.4 37.9 55.2 3.4 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 0.0 31.0 65.5 3.6 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 3.4 3.4 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 3.4 3.4 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 3.4 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 3.4 10.3 41.4 44.8 3.3 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 6.9 27.6 65.5 3.6 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 3.8 11.5 26.9 57.7 3.4 0.85 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 3.4 0.0 37.9 58.6 3.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 3.4 10.3 41.4 44.8 3.3 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 10.3 41.4 44.8 3.3 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 3.4 44.8 51.7 3.5 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 80.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 201 001L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldman, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 5.7 A 8 22.9 Sophomore 28 80.0 B 17 48.6 Junior 4 11.4 C 9 25.7 Senior 1 2.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 2.9 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 5.7 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 15 42.9 Required by my major 32 91.4 3 hours 13 37.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.7 4 - 5 hours 4 11.4 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 36.1 63.9 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 5.6 52.8 41.7 3.4 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 2.8 38.9 58.3 3.6 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 2.8 44.4 52.8 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 2.8 36.1 61.1 3.6 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 0.0 19.4 80.6 3.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 25.8 48.4 25.8 3.0 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 3.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 2.8 36.1 61.1 3.6 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 5.6 5.6 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 20.0 56.0 24.0 3.0 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 5.7 62.9 31.4 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 2.9 57.1 40.0 3.4 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 5.6 38.9 30.6 25.0 2.8 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 2.9 25.7 71.4 3.7 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 54 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 201 006L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldman, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 22.9 Sophomore 36 75.0 B 27 56.3 Junior 12 25.0 C 9 18.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 2.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 14.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 25.0 Required by my major 45 93.8 3 hours 14 29.2 Other (e.g. elective) 3 6.3 4 - 5 hours 11 22.9 6 - 7 hours 4 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 48 0.0 2.1 43.8 54.2 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 48 0.0 2.1 56.3 41.7 3.4 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 48 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 47 0.0 2.1 40.4 57.4 3.6 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 0.0 2.1 47.9 50.0 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 46 0.0 2.2 43.5 54.3 3.5 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 43 2.3 27.9 41.9 27.9 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 48 0.0 6.3 22.9 70.8 3.6 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 48 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 47 0.0 0.0 48.9 51.1 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 48 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 46 2.2 15.2 34.8 47.8 3.3 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 48 0.0 2.1 33.3 64.6 3.6 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 37 2.7 13.5 56.8 27.0 3.1 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 47 0.0 8.5 59.6 31.9 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 46 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 0.0 2.1 56.3 41.7 3.4 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 48 2.1 27.1 41.7 29.2 3.0 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 47 0.0 8.5 42.6 48.9 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 47 2.1 6.4 10.6 80.9 3.7 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 61 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 48 Percent completed = 78.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 201 007L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldman, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 22 47.8 Sophomore 39 83.0 B 18 39.1 Junior 8 17.0 C 6 13.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 4.3 Studies Program 1 2.1 2 hours 18 38.3 Required by my major 43 91.5 3 hours 16 34.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 6.4 4 - 5 hours 9 19.1 6 - 7 hours 1 2.1 8 or more hours 1 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 47 0.0 0.0 40.4 59.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 47 0.0 2.1 51.1 46.8 3.4 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 47 0.0 0.0 29.8 70.2 3.7 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 47 0.0 0.0 25.5 74.5 3.7 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 47 0.0 2.1 34.0 63.8 3.6 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 47 0.0 0.0 34.0 66.0 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 47 0.0 0.0 23.4 76.6 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 0.0 16.7 54.8 28.6 3.1 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 47 0.0 0.0 23.4 76.6 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 47 0.0 0.0 10.6 89.4 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 45 0.0 0.0 31.1 68.9 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 47 0.0 0.0 21.3 78.7 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 47 0.0 8.5 21.3 70.2 3.6 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 47 0.0 0.0 19.1 80.9 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 47 0.0 0.0 48.9 51.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 47 0.0 2.1 46.8 51.1 3.5 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 47 0.0 0.0 31.9 68.1 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 4.5 25.0 40.9 29.5 3.0 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 47 0.0 2.1 27.7 70.2 3.7 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 47 0.0 0.0 4.3 95.7 4.0 0.20. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 47 Percent completed = 78.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 202 002L1 MANAGERIAL USES OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldman, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 31.3 Sophomore 4 11.8 B 13 40.6 Junior 21 61.8 C 9 28.1 Senior 9 26.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 20.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 23.5 Required by my major 32 94.1 3 hours 14 41.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.9 4 - 5 hours 4 11.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 0.0 2.9 67.6 29.4 3.3 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 3.0 48.5 48.5 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 3.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 7.7 34.6 42.3 15.4 2.7 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 3.0 48.5 48.5 3.5 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 0.0 48.5 51.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 6.1 69.7 24.2 3.2 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 19.2 65.4 15.4 3.0 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 8.8 44.1 35.3 11.8 2.5 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 201 002L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holmes, James R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 23.5 Sophomore 24 70.6 B 17 50.0 Junior 5 14.7 C 7 20.6 Senior 4 11.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.9 E/Fail 1 2.9 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 17.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 44.1 Required by my major 31 88.6 3 hours 9 26.5 Other (e.g. elective) 4 11.4 4 - 5 hours 2 5.9 6 - 7 hours 2 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 2.7 2.7 59.5 35.1 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 2.7 5.4 67.6 24.3 3.1 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 5.4 73.0 21.6 3.2 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 0.0 81.1 18.9 3.2 0.40 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 2.7 10.8 64.9 21.6 3.1 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 2.9 34.3 48.6 14.3 2.7 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 10.8 10.8 59.5 18.9 2.9 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 8.1 0.0 56.8 35.1 3.2 0.81 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 3.1 75.0 21.9 3.2 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 8.1 5.4 64.9 21.6 3.0 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 10.8 21.6 51.4 16.2 2.7 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 5.4 62.2 32.4 3.3 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 3.8 23.1 61.5 11.5 2.8 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 5.6 0.0 80.6 13.9 3.0 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 2.8 8.3 75.0 13.9 3.0 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 2.7 5.4 67.6 24.3 3.1 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 10.8 29.7 51.4 8.1 2.6 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 5.4 16.2 64.9 13.5 2.9 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 13.5 10.8 56.8 18.9 2.8 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 66.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 211 003L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holmes, James R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 65.2 Sophomore 3 13.0 B 8 34.8 Junior 19 82.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 4.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 36.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 45.5 Required by my major 23 100.0 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 26.9 69.2 3.7 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 7.7 34.6 57.7 3.5 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 0.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 6.7 0.0 26.7 66.7 3.5 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 16.0 32.0 48.0 3.2 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 78.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 324 002L1 ACCOUNTING INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holmes, James R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 45.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 50.0 Junior 1 4.3 C 1 4.5 Senior 22 95.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 27.3 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 5 22.7 Required by my major 21 95.5 3 hours 6 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 21.7 60.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 22.7 68.2 9.1 2.9 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 17.4 69.6 13.0 3.0 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 13.0 73.9 13.0 3.0 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 8.7 17.4 65.2 8.7 2.7 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 54.5 40.9 4.5 2.5 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 30.4 69.6 0.0 2.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 69.6 30.4 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 87.0 13.0 3.1 0.34 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 87.0 8.7 3.0 0.37 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 9.1 50.0 40.9 0.0 2.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 30.8 69.2 0.0 2.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 22.7 77.3 0.0 2.8 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 18.2 81.8 0.0 2.8 0.39 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 17.4 82.6 0.0 2.8 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 14.3 33.3 52.4 0.0 2.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 13.0 26.1 60.9 0.0 2.5 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 34.8 56.5 8.7 2.7 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 62.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 407 003L1 CONCEPTS OF INCOME TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hulse, David S. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 34.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 4 15.4 Senior 26 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 19.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 23.1 Required by my major 24 92.3 3 hours 9 34.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 7.7 4 - 5 hours 5 19.2 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 7.7 42.3 50.0 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 12.0 48.0 40.0 3.3 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 3.8 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 3.8 57.7 34.6 3.2 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 10.0 10.0 55.0 25.0 3.0 0.89 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 7.7 11.5 50.0 30.8 3.0 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 3.8 26.9 69.2 3.7 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 627 401S1 CORPORATE TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hulse, David S. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 88.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 11.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 44.4 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 5 55.6 4 - 5 hours 4 44.4 6 - 7 hours 3 33.3 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 300 001L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Keller, Stuart B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 16.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 50.0 Junior 4 13.3 C 8 26.7 Senior 26 86.7 D 2 6.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 30.0 Required by my major 30 100.0 3 hours 12 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 3.3 76.7 20.0 3.2 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 6.7 43.3 46.7 3.3 2.5 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 10.0 76.7 10.0 2.9 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 6.7 23.3 56.7 13.3 2.8 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 3.3 93.3 3.3 3.0 0.26 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 40.0 56.7 3.3 2.6 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 13.8 34.5 44.8 6.9 2.4 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 6.9 65.5 27.6 3.2 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 3.3 6.7 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 31.0 44.8 20.7 3.4 2.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 30 6.7 53.3 33.3 6.7 2.4 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 4.3 34.8 56.5 4.3 2.6 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 32.1 57.1 7.1 2.7 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 35.7 60.7 3.6 2.7 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 6.7 36.7 56.7 0.0 2.5 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 30.0 53.3 13.3 3.3 1.9 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 16.7 30.0 50.0 3.3 2.4 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 20.0 36.7 36.7 6.7 2.3 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 65 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 46.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 300 002L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Keller, Stuart B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 38.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 26.2 Junior 5 11.9 C 14 33.3 Senior 37 88.1 D 1 2.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 21.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 40.5 Required by my major 42 100.0 3 hours 8 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 11.9 6 - 7 hours 3 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 0.0 65.9 34.1 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 9.5 23.8 50.0 16.7 2.7 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 2.4 9.5 73.8 14.3 3.0 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 2.4 11.9 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 9.5 64.3 26.2 3.2 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 2.4 66.7 31.0 3.3 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 2.4 33.3 42.9 21.4 2.8 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 11.9 23.8 47.6 16.7 2.7 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 2.4 46.3 51.2 3.5 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 35 0.0 0.0 62.9 37.1 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 12.5 65.0 22.5 3.1 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 19.0 45.2 26.2 9.5 2.3 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 41 14.6 41.5 34.1 9.8 2.4 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 3.0 24.2 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 4.9 26.8 61.0 7.3 2.7 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 2.6 28.2 59.0 10.3 2.8 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 2.4 31.7 53.7 12.2 2.8 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 21.4 47.6 19.0 11.9 2.2 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 11.9 26.2 57.1 4.8 2.5 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 14.3 21.4 35.7 28.6 2.8 1.02. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 68 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 61.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 403 002L1 AUDITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Neal, Terry L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 39.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 52.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 8.7 Senior 23 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 30.4 Required by my major 23 100.0 3 hours 8 34.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.7 6 - 7 hours 4 17.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 4.0 4.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 16.0 44.0 40.0 3.2 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 0.0 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 8.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 12.0 28.0 56.0 3.4 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 13.6 54.5 31.8 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 8.7 34.8 56.5 3.5 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 8.0 28.0 64.0 3.6 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 13.0 39.1 39.1 3.1 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 12.0 24.0 64.0 3.5 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 4.0 16.0 80.0 3.8 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 86.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 308 001L1 COST MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peffer, Sean A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 50.0 Junior 16 53.3 C 3 10.0 Senior 14 46.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 16.7 Required by my major 30 100.0 3 hours 11 36.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 10 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 3 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 9.4 90.6 3.9 0.30 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 45.2 32.3 22.6 0.0 1.8 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 3.1 0.0 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 3.1 18.8 78.1 3.8 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 3.1 37.5 59.4 3.6 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 16.1 83.9 3.8 0.37 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 0.0 15.6 43.8 40.6 3.3 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 0.0 21.9 78.1 3.8 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 21.9 78.1 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 6.3 34.4 59.4 3.5 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 0.0 3.1 96.9 4.0 0.18 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 15.6 46.9 37.5 3.2 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 0.0 3.1 96.9 4.0 0.18. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 82.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 308 002L1 COST MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peffer, Sean A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 43.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 18 46.2 Junior 24 61.5 C 4 10.3 Senior 15 38.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 2.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 10.3 Required by my major 39 100.0 3 hours 7 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 21 53.8 6 - 7 hours 4 10.3 8 or more hours 2 5.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 20.0 57.5 15.0 7.5 2.1 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 2.5 10.0 57.5 30.0 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 2.5 32.5 65.0 3.6 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 0.0 5.1 46.2 48.7 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 2.5 0.0 57.5 40.0 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 0.0 25.6 74.4 3.7 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 0.0 31.6 50.0 18.4 2.9 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 0.0 2.5 22.5 75.0 3.7 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 0.0 17.5 82.5 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 40 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 0.0 22.5 77.5 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 2.5 12.5 45.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.33 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 9.4 56.3 34.4 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 7.7 20.5 48.7 23.1 2.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 2.5 35.0 62.5 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 0.0 2.5 15.0 82.5 3.8 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 81.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 202 004L1 MANAGERIAL USES OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Poe, Clyde D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 31.4 Sophomore 3 8.6 B 14 40.0 Junior 24 68.6 C 9 25.7 Senior 7 20.0 D 1 2.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 2.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 28.6 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 12 34.3 Required by my major 31 88.6 3 hours 10 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 8.6 4 - 5 hours 3 8.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 71.8 28.2 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 0.0 15.4 71.8 12.8 3.0 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 25.7 65.7 8.6 2.8 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 12.8 5.1 59.0 23.1 2.9 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 2.6 5.1 66.7 25.6 3.2 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 10.5 78.9 10.5 3.0 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 0.0 64.9 35.1 3.4 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 16.0 36.0 40.0 8.0 2.4 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 10.3 28.2 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 2.6 64.1 33.3 3.3 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 35 0.0 0.0 77.1 22.9 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 5.1 69.2 25.6 3.2 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 15.4 48.7 25.6 10.3 2.3 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 37 10.8 48.6 32.4 8.1 2.4 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 2.9 26.5 64.7 5.9 2.7 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 18.4 78.9 2.6 2.8 0.44 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 23.1 71.8 5.1 2.8 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 10.3 84.6 5.1 2.9 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 17.9 43.6 35.9 2.6 2.2 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 13.2 31.6 50.0 5.3 2.5 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 10.5 34.2 42.1 13.2 2.6 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 97 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 40.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 628 001L1 FINANCIAL/MANAGERIAL ACC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Poe, Clyde D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 22 62.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 37.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 36 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 11.1 Studies Program 1 2.8 2 hours 4 11.1 Required by my major 35 97.2 3 hours 9 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 11 30.6 6 - 7 hours 7 19.4 8 or more hours 1 2.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 2.8 50.0 47.2 3.4 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 5.6 36.1 58.3 3.5 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 2.8 47.2 50.0 3.5 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 5.6 47.2 47.2 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 8.3 52.8 38.9 3.3 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 13.9 86.1 3.9 0.35 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 36 2.8 2.8 41.7 52.8 3.4 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 3.0 0.0 78.8 18.2 3.1 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 0.0 63.9 36.1 3.4 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 0.0 39.4 45.5 15.2 2.8 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 2.8 47.2 50.0 3.5 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 69.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 628 401L1 FINANCIAL/MANAGERIAL ACC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Poe, Clyde D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 25 59.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 16 38.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 2.4 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 44 97.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 2.2 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 4.7 Studies Program 6 13.6 2 hours 2 4.7 Required by my major 35 79.5 3 hours 11 25.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 6.8 4 - 5 hours 16 37.2 6 - 7 hours 4 9.3 8 or more hours 8 18.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 46 0.0 2.2 50.0 47.8 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 2.2 4.3 43.5 50.0 3.4 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 46 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 46 2.2 4.3 45.7 47.8 3.4 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 46 0.0 6.5 52.2 41.3 3.3 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 46 0.0 6.5 58.7 34.8 3.3 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 43 2.3 14.0 51.2 32.6 3.1 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 46 2.2 10.9 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 46 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 45 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 6.8 20.5 36.4 36.4 3.0 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 46 0.0 17.4 50.0 32.6 3.2 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 13.2 60.5 26.3 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 42 0.0 11.9 47.6 40.5 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 44 0.0 9.1 52.3 38.6 3.3 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 4.4 48.9 33.3 13.3 2.6 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 46 0.0 10.9 50.0 39.1 3.3 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 46 2.2 4.3 30.4 63.0 3.5 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 46 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 507 001L1 ADV TOPS IN TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pope, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 29.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 47.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 4 23.5 Senior 14 82.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 11.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 5.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 18.8 43.8 37.5 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 26.7 33.3 33.3 2.9 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 23.5 47.1 29.4 3.1 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 68.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 507 002L1 ADV TOPS IN TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pope, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 56.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 30.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 13.0 Senior 22 95.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 52.2 Required by my major 18 78.3 3 hours 5 21.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 21.7 4 - 5 hours 4 17.4 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 8.0 28.0 64.0 3.6 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 12.0 44.0 44.0 3.3 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 16.0 40.0 44.0 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 8.7 34.8 56.5 3.5 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 16.0 36.0 48.0 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 20.0 48.0 32.0 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 12.5 45.8 41.7 3.3 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 16.7 37.5 45.8 3.3 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 89.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 617 401S1 INCOME TAX DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pope, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 55.6 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 44.4 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 22.2 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 403 003L1 AUDITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ramsay, Robert J. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 54.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 12.5 Senior 24 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 41.7 Required by my major 22 91.7 3 hours 9 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.3 4 - 5 hours 4 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 68.0 32.0 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 8.0 72.0 20.0 3.1 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 76.0 24.0 3.2 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 64.0 36.0 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 21.7 73.9 4.3 2.8 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 64.0 36.0 3.4 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 20.0 52.0 28.0 3.1 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 14.3 81.0 4.8 2.9 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 76.0 20.0 3.2 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 8.0 80.0 12.0 3.0 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 45.8 37.5 12.5 2.6 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 4.0 72.0 24.0 3.2 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 78.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 603 001S1 ATTEST FUNCTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ramsay, Robert J. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 80.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 4 40.0 8 or more hours 4 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 10.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 2.6 0.84 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 10.0 10.0 80.0 0.0 2.7 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 60.0 30.0 0.0 2.2 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 324 001L1 ACCOUNTING INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Stone, Dan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 30.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 20 60.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 9.1 Senior 33 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 27.3 Required by my major 32 97.0 3 hours 7 21.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.0 4 - 5 hours 12 36.4 6 - 7 hours 3 9.1 8 or more hours 1 3.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 5.7 25.7 54.3 14.3 2.8 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 14.3 25.7 54.3 5.7 2.5 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 8.6 42.9 37.1 11.4 2.5 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 50.0 20.0 30.0 0.0 1.8 0.92 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 25.7 51.4 22.9 0.0 2.0 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 5.7 22.9 62.9 8.6 2.7 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 2.9 17.1 74.3 5.7 2.8 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 20.6 58.8 20.6 0.0 2.0 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 11.4 37.1 40.0 11.4 2.5 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 8.6 60.0 31.4 3.2 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 6.5 77.4 16.1 3.1 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 8.8 76.5 14.7 3.1 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 25.7 37.1 34.3 2.9 2.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 3.1 28.1 59.4 9.4 2.8 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 8.8 29.4 55.9 5.9 2.6 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 5.9 47.1 41.2 5.9 2.5 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 17.1 28.6 48.6 5.7 2.4 0.85 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 30.3 36.4 30.3 3.0 2.1 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 38.2 26.5 32.4 2.9 2.0 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 17.6 32.4 41.2 8.8 2.4 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 301 003L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Vandaniker, Relmond P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 28.0 Sophomore 1 4.0 B 10 40.0 Junior 18 72.0 C 8 32.0 Senior 6 24.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 16.0 Required by my major 25 100.0 3 hours 11 44.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 8.0 8 or more hours 1 4.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 80.8 19.2 3.2 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 11.5 76.9 11.5 3.0 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 46.2 46.2 7.7 2.6 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 65.4 30.8 3.3 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 4.0 64.0 32.0 3.3 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 4.0 68.0 20.0 8.0 2.3 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 19.2 57.7 23.1 0.0 2.0 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 8.7 73.9 17.4 3.1 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 30.8 53.8 11.5 2.7 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 76.9 19.2 3.2 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 13.6 86.4 0.0 2.9 0.35 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 20.0 68.0 12.0 2.9 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 24.0 64.0 12.0 2.9 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 15.4 65.4 19.2 3.0 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 3.8 46.2 46.2 3.8 2.5 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 26.9 57.7 11.5 2.8 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 7.7 57.7 34.6 0.0 2.3 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 410 001L1 NOT-FOR-PROFIT AND REGULATORY ACCOUNTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Vandaniker, Relmond P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 1 5.0 C 6 30.0 Senior 19 95.0 D 1 5.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 15.0 Required by my major 16 84.2 3 hours 9 45.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 7 35.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 71.4 23.8 3.2 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 23.8 23.8 52.4 0.0 2.3 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 14.3 81.0 4.8 2.9 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 4.8 90.5 4.8 3.0 0.32 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 23.8 61.9 14.3 2.9 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 45.0 40.0 10.0 2.6 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 9.5 57.1 33.3 0.0 2.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 4.8 42.9 42.9 9.5 2.6 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 14.3 23.8 57.1 4.8 2.5 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 14.3 81.0 4.8 2.9 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 18.8 75.0 0.0 2.7 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 5.0 85.0 5.0 2.9 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 26.3 63.2 5.3 2.7 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 5.0 30.0 60.0 5.0 2.7 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 60.0 25.0 5.0 2.3 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 9.5 42.9 47.6 0.0 2.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 407 001L1 CONCEPTS OF INCOME TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Vines, Cynthia C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 33.3 Junior 2 16.7 C 1 8.3 Senior 9 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 41.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 75.0 3 hours 5 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 25.0 4 - 5 hours 2 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 54.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 407 002L1 CONCEPTS OF INCOME TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Vines, Cynthia C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 55.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 2 10.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 18 90.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 15.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 40.0 Required by my major 18 90.0 3 hours 3 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 4 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 0.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 21.1 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.31. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 302 002L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wells, Jane B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 46.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 32.1 Junior 5 17.9 C 6 21.4 Senior 23 82.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 10.7 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 4 14.3 Required by my major 27 96.4 3 hours 8 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 9 32.1 6 - 7 hours 2 7.1 8 or more hours 2 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 3.6 46.4 50.0 3.5 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 7.4 11.1 81.5 3.7 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 7.1 25.0 67.9 3.6 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 14.3 82.1 3.8 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 0.0 3.6 21.4 75.0 3.7 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 3.6 39.3 57.1 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 3.6 39.3 57.1 3.5 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 3.6 28.6 67.9 3.6 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 3.6 25.0 71.4 3.7 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 3.6 14.3 82.1 3.8 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 302 003L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wells, Jane B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 32.0 Junior 1 3.8 C 2 8.0 Senior 25 96.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 19.2 Required by my major 26 100.0 3 hours 12 46.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 6 23.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 2 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 7.4 14.8 44.4 33.3 3.0 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 3.7 14.8 81.5 3.8 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 3.8 23.1 73.1 3.7 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 3.7 14.8 81.5 3.8 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 3.7 18.5 77.8 3.7 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 3.7 29.6 66.7 3.6 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 7.7 26.9 65.4 3.6 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 26.9 69.2 3.7 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 16.7 37.5 41.7 3.2 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 3.7 7.4 22.2 66.7 3.5 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 0.0 3.7 96.3 4.0 0.19. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 93.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************