****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 651 001L1 COMMUNICATION THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anyaegbunam, Chike ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 5 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 10.0 0.0 20.0 70.0 3.5 0.97 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 10.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 2.8 1.03. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 619 001L1 PROSEM IN INTERNATIONAL/ INTERCULTURAL COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Boyd, Douglas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 91.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 8.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 90.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 3 27.3 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 8 72.7 4 - 5 hours 6 54.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 18.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 601 401S1 PROSEM IN COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hertog, James K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 92.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 92.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 23.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 69.2 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 6 46.2 6 - 7 hours 4 30.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 7.7 15.4 46.2 30.8 3.0 0.91 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 630 401S1 PROSEM IN MASS MEDIA LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moore, Roy L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 775 001L1 SEM HEALTH COMM CAMPGNS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Palmgreen, Philip C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 88.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 11.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 71.4 4 - 5 hours 4 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 003L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Armendarez, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 14.3 A 14 66.7 Sophomore 3 14.3 B 7 33.3 Junior 5 23.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 47.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 42.9 Studies Program 17 81.0 2 hours 7 33.3 Required by my major 3 14.3 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 8.7 13.0 60.9 17.4 2.9 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 4.5 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 21.7 60.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 9.1 13.6 63.6 13.6 2.8 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 86.4 13.6 3.1 0.35 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 18.2 27.3 50.0 4.5 2.4 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 13.0 69.6 13.0 2.9 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 004L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Armendarez, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.3 A 19 82.6 Sophomore 10 43.5 B 3 13.0 Junior 12 52.2 C 1 4.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 43.5 Studies Program 18 78.3 2 hours 11 47.8 Required by my major 3 13.0 3 hours 2 8.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 0.0 45.8 50.0 3.4 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 4.2 0.0 25.0 70.8 3.6 0.71 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 4.5 22.7 72.7 3.7 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 0.0 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 13.0 34.8 43.5 3.1 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 8.7 30.4 56.5 3.4 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 10.0 0.0 80.0 10.0 2.9 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 012L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Armendarez, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 75.0 A 13 65.0 Sophomore 3 15.0 B 5 25.0 Junior 2 10.0 C 2 10.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 40.0 Studies Program 12 63.2 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 6 31.6 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.3 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 0.0 45.0 50.0 3.4 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 15.0 35.0 45.0 3.2 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 15.8 26.3 52.6 3.3 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 40.0 45.0 15.0 2.8 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 87.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 449 001L1 SOCIAL PROCESSES/EFFECTS OF MASS COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Armendarez, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 20.0 Junior 3 15.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 17 85.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 60.0 Required by my major 17 85.0 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 4.8 0.0 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 9.5 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 9.5 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 9.5 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 9.5 38.1 47.6 3.3 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 5.0 35.0 55.0 3.4 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 20.0 25.0 55.0 3.4 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 482 001L1 PERSUASION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baseheart, John R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 52.4 Junior 1 4.8 C 3 14.3 Senior 20 95.2 D 1 4.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 28.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 28.6 Required by my major 15 71.4 3 hours 6 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 6 28.6 4 - 5 hours 3 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 17.4 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 8.7 21.7 56.5 13.0 2.7 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 21.7 30.4 39.1 8.7 2.3 0.93 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 13.0 34.8 39.1 13.0 2.5 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 21.7 39.1 34.8 4.3 2.2 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 13.6 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 18.2 36.4 36.4 9.1 2.4 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 21.7 52.2 17.4 8.7 2.1 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 23 4.3 13.0 56.5 26.1 3.0 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 26.1 39.1 26.1 8.7 2.2 0.94 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 26.1 39.1 26.1 8.7 2.2 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 22 22.7 18.2 50.0 9.1 2.5 0.96 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 10.0 25.0 55.0 10.0 2.7 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 14.3 28.6 52.4 4.8 2.5 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 42.9 52.4 4.8 2.6 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 13.6 27.3 54.5 4.5 2.5 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 50.0 31.8 4.5 2.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 22.7 40.9 31.8 4.5 2.2 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 45.5 22.7 27.3 4.5 1.9 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 85.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 007L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 19.0 A 18 85.7 Sophomore 2 9.5 B 3 14.3 Junior 2 9.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 61.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 33.3 Studies Program 16 76.2 2 hours 10 47.6 Required by my major 3 14.3 3 hours 2 9.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 4.5 31.8 63.6 3.6 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 22.7 36.4 40.9 3.2 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 22.7 45.5 31.8 3.1 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 008L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 17.6 A 13 76.5 Sophomore 8 47.1 B 4 23.5 Junior 5 29.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 58.8 Studies Program 10 62.5 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 3 18.8 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 18.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 89.5 10.5 3.1 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 5.0 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 30.0 60.0 5.0 2.7 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 281 001L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 8.7 A 14 60.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 34.8 Junior 5 21.7 C 1 4.3 Senior 16 69.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 26.1 Studies Program 11 47.8 2 hours 2 8.7 Required by my major 11 47.8 3 hours 3 13.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 9 39.1 6 - 7 hours 2 8.7 8 or more hours 1 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 8.3 45.8 37.5 3.1 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 12.5 45.8 37.5 3.2 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 16.7 45.8 37.5 3.2 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 20.8 33.3 45.8 3.3 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 18.2 50.0 27.3 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 13.0 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 16.7 29.2 54.2 3.4 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 16.7 37.5 45.8 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 20.8 37.5 25.0 2.7 1.04 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 13.6 13.6 31.8 40.9 3.0 1.07 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 13.6 45.5 40.9 3.3 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 25.0 0.0 50.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 33.3 16.7 0.0 50.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 281 002L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 81.8 Sophomore 6 27.3 B 3 13.6 Junior 8 36.4 C 1 4.5 Senior 8 36.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 31.8 Studies Program 8 38.1 2 hours 4 18.2 Required by my major 8 38.1 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 23.8 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 8.7 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 79.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 281 004L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 5 35.7 Junior 9 64.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 9 64.3 2 hours 6 42.9 Required by my major 4 28.6 3 hours 6 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 11.1 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 27.8 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 325 401L1 BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 57.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 42.1 Junior 2 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 18 90.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 20.0 Studies Program 8 40.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 10 50.0 3 hours 5 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 4 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 4.0 0.22 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 10.5 21.1 68.4 3.6 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 10.5 15.8 68.4 3.5 0.90 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 5.3 26.3 63.2 3.5 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 26.3 31.6 42.1 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 87.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 001L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 34 50.7 A 20 30.8 Sophomore 27 40.3 B 29 44.6 Junior 3 4.5 C 12 18.5 Senior 3 4.5 D 3 4.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.5 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 32.3 Studies Program 24 37.5 2 hours 21 32.3 Required by my major 23 35.9 3 hours 7 10.8 Other (e.g. elective) 17 26.6 4 - 5 hours 15 23.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 1.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 79 0.0 1.3 35.4 63.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 79 8.9 15.2 31.6 44.3 3.1 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 78 2.6 6.4 46.2 44.9 3.3 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 79 0.0 1.3 31.6 67.1 3.7 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 80 1.3 1.3 38.8 58.8 3.6 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 78 1.3 1.3 34.6 62.8 3.6 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 78 1.3 11.5 46.2 41.0 3.3 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 77 5.2 15.6 45.5 33.8 3.1 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 78 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 79 0.0 0.0 15.2 84.8 3.8 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 78 0.0 7.7 34.6 57.7 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 79 1.3 0.0 21.5 77.2 3.7 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 79 0.0 1.3 17.7 81.0 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 78 0.0 1.3 28.2 70.5 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 78 0.0 1.3 38.5 60.3 3.6 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 77 0.0 5.2 37.7 57.1 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 74 0.0 8.1 43.2 48.6 3.4 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 79 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 76 0.0 1.3 34.2 64.5 3.6 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 78 0.0 1.3 14.1 84.6 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 78 1.3 1.3 11.5 85.9 3.8 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 25 0.0 8.0 56.0 36.0 3.3 0.61 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 31 0.0 6.5 45.2 48.4 3.4 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 31 3.2 6.5 48.4 41.9 3.3 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 104 Number of forms scanned = 102 Number of forms with at least one student response = 80 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 002L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 38 50.7 A 34 45.9 Sophomore 10 13.3 B 30 40.5 Junior 16 21.3 C 9 12.2 Senior 11 14.7 D 1 1.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 39 52.7 Studies Program 30 40.0 2 hours 20 27.0 Required by my major 29 38.7 3 hours 10 13.5 Other (e.g. elective) 16 21.3 4 - 5 hours 3 4.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 2.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 87 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 85 11.8 9.4 29.4 49.4 3.2 1.02 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 83 3.6 2.4 50.6 43.4 3.3 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 87 1.1 2.3 27.6 69.0 3.6 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 88 1.1 6.8 34.1 58.0 3.5 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 88 0.0 1.1 40.9 58.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 88 4.5 13.6 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 87 3.4 17.2 44.8 34.5 3.1 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 88 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 88 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 78 1.3 2.6 32.1 64.1 3.6 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 87 0.0 0.0 25.3 74.7 3.7 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 88 0.0 1.1 15.9 83.0 3.8 0.42 14. Encouraged class participation 88 0.0 1.1 25.0 73.9 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 87 0.0 1.1 33.3 65.5 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 87 0.0 2.3 34.5 63.2 3.6 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 84 1.2 4.8 39.3 54.8 3.5 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 88 0.0 4.5 22.7 72.7 3.7 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 88 1.1 2.3 28.4 68.2 3.6 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 86 0.0 3.5 14.0 82.6 3.8 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 86 0.0 0.0 11.6 88.4 3.9 0.32. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 29 0.0 3.4 51.7 44.8 3.4 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 32 6.3 6.3 50.0 37.5 3.2 0.82 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 118 Number of forms scanned = 95 Number of forms with at least one student response = 88 Percent completed = 74.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 453 001L1 MASS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL ISSUES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 28.0 Sophomore 1 4.0 B 16 64.0 Junior 1 4.0 C 2 8.0 Senior 23 92.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 24.0 Required by my major 14 56.0 3 hours 12 48.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 44.0 4 - 5 hours 6 24.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 0.0 3.7 96.3 4.0 0.19 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 14.8 81.5 3.8 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 6.3 31.3 56.3 3.4 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 7.4 92.6 3.9 0.27 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 3.7 96.3 4.0 0.19 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 3.8 26.9 69.2 3.7 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 11.1 14.8 74.1 3.6 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 3.8 7.7 88.5 3.8 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 11.5 84.6 3.8 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.27 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 11.5 88.5 3.9 0.33 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 0.0 3.8 96.2 4.0 0.20 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.27. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 93.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 181 201L1 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fitch, Sandra ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 33.3 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 2 33.3 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 16.7 Studies Program 4 66.7 2 hours 5 83.3 Required by my major 2 33.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 34.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 181 009L2 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Krumrey-Fulks, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 31.8 A 13 61.9 Sophomore 5 22.7 B 6 28.6 Junior 6 27.3 C 1 4.8 Senior 4 18.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 4.8 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 33.3 Studies Program 18 81.8 2 hours 7 33.3 Required by my major 3 13.6 3 hours 6 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.5 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 33.3 50.0 8.3 2.6 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 12.5 25.0 58.3 4.2 2.5 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 0.38 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 37.5 45.8 12.5 2.7 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 12.5 25.0 54.2 8.3 2.6 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 12.5 12.5 62.5 12.5 2.8 0.85 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 29.2 58.3 8.3 2.7 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 79.2 16.7 3.1 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 4.3 82.6 13.0 3.1 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 8.3 62.5 20.8 8.3 2.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 20.8 62.5 16.7 3.0 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 14.3 76.2 9.5 3.0 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 36.8 52.6 10.5 2.7 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 95.8 4.2 3.0 0.20 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 25.0 54.2 16.7 4.2 2.0 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 50.0 41.7 8.3 2.6 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 12.5 33.3 45.8 8.3 2.5 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 36.4 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.69 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 21 9.5 9.5 81.0 0.0 2.7 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 0.0 26.3 73.7 0.0 2.7 0.45 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 181 010L2 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Krumrey-Fulks, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.7 A 9 60.0 Sophomore 9 60.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 4 26.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 40.0 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 4 26.7 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 41.2 35.3 23.5 2.8 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 40.0 50.0 10.0 2.7 0.67 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 6.7 6.7 73.3 13.3 2.9 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 252 010L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lane, Derek ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 11.1 A 5 26.3 Sophomore 9 50.0 B 12 63.2 Junior 5 27.8 C 2 10.5 Senior 2 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 47.4 Required by my major 17 100.0 3 hours 6 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 2 10.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.0 1.10 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 14.3 38.1 47.6 3.3 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 14.3 14.3 33.3 38.1 3.0 1.07 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 9.5 38.1 47.6 3.3 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 21 9.5 9.5 14.3 66.7 3.4 1.02 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 19.0 76.2 3.7 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 20.0 25.0 55.0 3.4 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 9.5 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 4.8 4.8 33.3 57.1 3.4 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 91.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 281 003L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lane, Derek ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.0 A 17 68.0 Sophomore 1 4.0 B 7 28.0 Junior 17 68.0 C 1 4.0 Senior 6 24.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.0 Studies Program 2 8.0 2 hours 10 40.0 Required by my major 17 68.0 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 24.0 4 - 5 hours 6 24.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 22.2 74.1 3.7 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 3.7 0.0 18.5 77.8 3.7 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 7.4 18.5 74.1 3.7 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 3.7 11.1 85.2 3.8 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 3.7 7.4 88.9 3.9 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 3.7 96.3 4.0 0.19 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 3.7 3.7 92.6 3.9 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 3.7 3.7 92.6 3.9 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 7.4 7.4 85.2 3.8 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 7.4 92.6 3.9 0.27 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 7.4 29.6 63.0 3.6 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 7.4 3.7 88.9 3.8 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 3.7 3.7 92.6 3.9 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 365 001L1 INTRO TO COMM RES METH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lane, Derek ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 11.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 57.7 Junior 3 11.5 C 8 30.8 Senior 23 88.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 3.8 Required by my major 26 100.0 3 hours 4 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 11 42.3 6 - 7 hours 6 23.1 8 or more hours 4 15.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 33.3 22.2 44.4 3.1 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 3.7 3.7 33.3 59.3 3.5 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 3.7 96.3 4.0 0.19 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 3.7 7.4 29.6 59.3 3.4 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 3.7 0.0 44.4 51.9 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 11.1 14.8 48.1 25.9 2.9 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 3.7 0.0 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 0.0 3.7 96.3 4.0 0.19. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 87.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 181 001L2 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Letcher, Traci ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 15.8 A 17 89.5 Sophomore 2 10.5 B 2 10.5 Junior 13 68.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 31.6 Studies Program 15 78.9 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 4 21.1 3 hours 3 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 15.8 10.5 42.1 31.6 2.9 1.05 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 47.4 31.6 10.5 2.4 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 181 015L2 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Letcher, Traci ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 57.9 A 16 84.2 Sophomore 1 5.3 B 3 15.8 Junior 5 26.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 10.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 21.1 Studies Program 16 84.2 2 hours 9 47.4 Required by my major 3 15.8 3 hours 2 10.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 15.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 10.0 15.0 70.0 5.0 2.7 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 9.5 23.8 61.9 4.8 2.6 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 14.3 61.9 23.8 3.1 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 23.8 66.7 9.5 2.9 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 10.0 25.0 60.0 5.0 2.6 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 19.0 61.9 19.0 3.0 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 5.3 84.2 5.3 2.9 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 15.0 75.0 5.0 2.8 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 31.6 63.2 0.0 2.6 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 5.3 84.2 5.3 2.9 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 16.7 50.0 33.3 0.0 2.2 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 23.8 61.9 9.5 2.8 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 4.8 9.5 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 22.2 11.1 66.7 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 5.9 17.6 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 11.1 16.7 66.7 5.6 2.7 0.77 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 181 018L2 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Letcher, Traci ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 68.8 A 10 62.5 Sophomore 4 25.0 B 5 31.3 Junior 1 6.3 C 1 6.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 12.5 Studies Program 13 81.3 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 2 12.5 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 4 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 16.7 5.6 66.7 11.1 2.7 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 27.8 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 23.5 47.1 29.4 3.1 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 43.8 31.3 3.1 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 0.32 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 23.5 17.6 52.9 5.9 2.4 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 7.7 30.8 61.5 0.0 2.5 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 7.7 84.6 7.7 3.0 0.41 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 72.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 403L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Letcher, Traci ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 1 6.7 B 7 46.7 Junior 8 53.3 C 1 6.7 Senior 6 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 12 80.0 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 3 20.0 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 13.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 17.6 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 23.5 47.1 29.4 3.1 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 35.3 35.3 23.5 2.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 17.6 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 57.1 28.6 14.3 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 73.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 404L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Letcher, Traci ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 75.0 Sophomore 8 47.1 B 4 25.0 Junior 6 35.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 17.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 12 70.6 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 3 17.6 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 3.7 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 15.0 80.0 3.8 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 25.0 65.0 3.6 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 30.0 35.0 35.0 3.1 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 87.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 181 023L1 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Cyndy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 25.0 A 10 83.3 Sophomore 5 41.7 B 2 16.7 Junior 2 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 41.7 Studies Program 8 66.7 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 3 25.0 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 2 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 18.8 37.5 43.8 3.3 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 181 024L1 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Cyndy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 11.8 A 15 88.2 Sophomore 12 70.6 B 2 11.8 Junior 2 11.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 52.9 Studies Program 11 68.8 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 4 25.0 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 21.1 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 11.8 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 29.4 41.2 23.5 2.8 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 525 401L1 ORGANIZATIONAL COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Laban ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 50.0 Junior 1 5.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 18 94.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 44.4 Required by my major 15 78.9 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 21.1 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 4.8 0.0 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 9.5 23.8 28.6 38.1 3.0 1.02 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 19.0 42.9 38.1 3.2 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 18.8 43.8 37.5 3.2 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 19.0 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 9.5 19.0 38.1 33.3 3.0 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 11. Was available for consultation 21 9.5 0.0 57.1 33.3 3.1 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 28.6 38.1 28.6 2.9 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 19.0 42.9 38.1 3.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 10.5 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 4.8 19.0 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 10.0 15.0 45.0 30.0 3.0 0.94 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 4.8 19.0 38.1 38.1 3.1 0.89 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 28.6 38.1 28.6 2.9 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 14.3 9.5 47.6 28.6 2.9 1.00 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 14.3 14.3 33.3 38.1 3.0 1.07. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 181 202L1 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 100.0 Sophomore 5 35.7 B 0 0.0 Junior 6 42.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 21.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 9 64.3 2 hours 7 50.0 Required by my major 5 35.7 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 63.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 462 001L1 INTERCULTURAL COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Morgan, Susan E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 58.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 8.3 Senior 24 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 37.5 Required by my major 16 66.7 3 hours 9 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 8 33.3 4 - 5 hours 3 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 4.2 37.5 50.0 3.3 0.91 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 4.2 20.8 75.0 3.7 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.28 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.28 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.28 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 8.7 21.7 69.6 3.6 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 4.2 25.0 70.8 3.7 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 4.2 12.5 83.3 3.8 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 181 016L2 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = NEAD, MARY JO ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 7.1 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 6 42.9 B 4 28.6 Junior 7 50.0 C 1 7.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 57.1 Studies Program 13 92.9 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 13.3 46.7 33.3 6.7 2.3 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 33.3 53.3 6.7 2.6 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 26.7 26.7 46.7 3.2 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 13 15.4 15.4 30.8 38.5 2.9 1.12 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 40.0 26.7 26.7 2.7 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 30.8 38.5 23.1 7.7 2.1 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 20.0 26.7 53.3 3.3 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 001L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Parker, James S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 16.7 A 14 77.8 Sophomore 2 11.1 B 4 22.2 Junior 8 44.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 27.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 83.3 Studies Program 4 22.2 2 hours 2 11.1 Required by my major 12 66.7 3 hours 1 5.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 19.0 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 45.0 35.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 14.3 76.2 3.7 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 95.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 002L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Parker, James S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 7.1 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 3 21.4 B 7 46.7 Junior 6 42.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 60.0 Studies Program 1 6.7 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 12 80.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 6.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 9.1 0.0 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.93 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 12.5 31.3 56.3 3.4 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 12.5 25.0 56.3 3.3 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 25.0 41.7 33.3 3.1 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 21.4 42.9 28.6 2.9 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 6.3 6.3 37.5 50.0 3.3 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 69.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 401L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Parker, James S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 61.1 Sophomore 3 16.7 B 7 38.9 Junior 9 50.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 77.8 Studies Program 5 29.4 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 12 70.6 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 27.3 45.5 22.7 2.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 8.7 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 9.5 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 5.0 55.0 35.0 3.2 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 10.5 5.3 57.9 26.3 3.0 0.88 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 13.3 6.7 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.92 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 4.3 0.0 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 20.0 30.0 40.0 10.0 2.4 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 8.7 13.0 34.8 43.5 3.1 0.97 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 4.3 26.1 69.6 3.7 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 402L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Parker, James S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.6 A 13 76.5 Sophomore 9 50.0 B 4 23.5 Junior 7 38.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 58.8 Studies Program 3 17.6 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 13 76.5 3 hours 1 5.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 22.2 16.7 38.9 22.2 2.6 1.09 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 13.3 20.0 66.7 3.5 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 17.6 76.5 3.7 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 41.2 23.5 29.4 2.8 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 319 001L1 WORLD MEDIA SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rush, Ramona R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 7 70.0 3 hours 5 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 30.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 46.2 38.5 15.4 2.7 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 8.3 33.3 41.7 16.7 2.7 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 30.8 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 0.0 53.8 38.5 3.2 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 8.3 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.94 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 16.7 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.90 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 23.1 38.5 30.8 2.9 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 61.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 001L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Sweigert, Regina ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 18.2 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 4 18.2 B 7 31.8 Junior 4 18.2 C 2 9.1 Senior 10 45.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 40.9 Studies Program 17 77.3 2 hours 9 40.9 Required by my major 5 22.7 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 21.7 73.9 3.7 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 8.7 26.1 65.2 3.6 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 4.3 30.4 65.2 3.6 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 8.7 13.0 78.3 3.7 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 4.5 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 8.7 34.8 52.2 3.3 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 4.3 0.0 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 26.1 34.8 34.8 3.0 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 0.0 21.7 73.9 3.7 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 002L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Sweigert, Regina ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 25.0 A 14 70.0 Sophomore 8 40.0 B 4 20.0 Junior 7 35.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 17 85.0 2 hours 9 45.0 Required by my major 2 10.0 3 hours 1 5.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 31.8 63.6 3.6 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 23.8 19.0 57.1 3.3 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 006L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Sweigert, Regina ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 9.5 A 12 60.0 Sophomore 11 52.4 B 6 30.0 Junior 8 38.1 C 2 10.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 28.6 Studies Program 17 81.0 2 hours 11 52.4 Required by my major 4 19.0 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 12.5 83.3 3.8 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 009L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Sweigert, Regina ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 22.7 A 17 77.3 Sophomore 10 45.5 B 5 22.7 Junior 1 4.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 27.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 18.2 Studies Program 18 81.8 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 4 18.2 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 23.8 42.9 33.3 3.1 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 249 001L1 MASS MEDIA/MASS CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Van Tubergen, G Norman ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 2 11.1 B 10 58.8 Junior 16 88.9 C 1 5.9 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 14 77.8 3 hours 7 41.2 Other (e.g. elective) 3 16.7 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 13.0 56.5 30.4 3.2 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 21.7 43.5 34.8 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 4.3 13.0 43.5 39.1 3.2 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 13.0 17.4 43.5 26.1 2.8 0.98 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 8.7 26.1 39.1 26.1 2.8 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 8.7 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 19.0 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 15.0 45.0 35.0 3.1 0.85 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 21.1 52.6 21.1 2.9 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 4.3 13.0 47.8 34.8 3.1 0.81 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 13.6 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 17.4 47.8 30.4 3.0 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 21.7 52.2 21.7 2.9 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 85.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 249 002L1 MASS MEDIA/MASS CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Van Tubergen, G Norman ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 2 15.4 B 8 61.5 Junior 6 46.2 C 1 7.7 Senior 5 38.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 23.1 Studies Program 1 7.7 2 hours 8 61.5 Required by my major 9 69.2 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 23.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 23.1 15.4 46.2 15.4 2.5 1.05 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 21.4 7.1 71.4 0.0 2.5 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 1.03. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 70.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 351 001L1 INTRO COMMUNICATION THRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Waldhart, Enid S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 11.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 65.4 Junior 3 11.5 C 6 23.1 Senior 23 88.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 26 100.0 3 hours 4 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 10 38.5 6 - 7 hours 9 34.6 8 or more hours 3 11.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 3.7 25.9 70.4 3.7 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 7.4 33.3 59.3 3.5 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 3.7 3.7 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 3.7 3.7 37.0 55.6 3.4 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 7.4 3.7 48.1 40.7 3.2 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 7.4 11.1 40.7 40.7 3.1 0.91 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 3.7 3.7 48.1 44.4 3.3 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 14.8 48.1 37.0 3.2 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 11.1 14.8 37.0 37.0 3.0 1.00 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 3.7 40.7 55.6 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 12.0 48.0 40.0 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 3.7 0.0 44.4 51.9 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 11.5 11.5 46.2 30.8 3.0 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 7.4 3.7 37.0 51.9 3.3 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 7.4 3.7 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 87.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 584 001L1 TCHG OF SPEECH COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Waldhart, Enid S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 66.7 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 40.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 44.4 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 55.6 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 3 33.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 44.4 22.2 33.3 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 181 401L1 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Witt, Donald E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.5 A 17 94.4 Sophomore 8 42.1 B 1 5.6 Junior 5 26.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 21.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 36.8 Studies Program 11 57.9 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 7 36.8 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.3 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 0.0 52.4 42.9 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 30.0 35.0 30.0 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 4.8 19.0 76.2 3.7 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 91.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 181 402L1 BASIC PUBLIC SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Witt, Donald E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 18.8 A 15 93.8 Sophomore 8 50.0 B 1 6.3 Junior 4 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 6.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 62.5 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 3 20.0 3 hours 1 6.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 16.7 27.8 55.6 3.4 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 23.5 70.6 3.6 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 624 001L1 INFO IN SCI & TECHNOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Andrews, James ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 16 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 16 100.0 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 25.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 2.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 12.5 6.3 43.8 37.5 3.1 1.00 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 5.9 17.6 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 5.6 11.1 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.80 11. Was available for consultation 15 6.7 6.7 33.3 53.3 3.3 0.90 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 5.9 29.4 29.4 35.3 2.9 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 0.0 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 3.2 0.39 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 0.0 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 33.3 33.3 27.8 2.8 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 16.7 27.8 50.0 3.2 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 600 001L1 INFORMATION IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Case, Donald ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 85.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 15.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 18 90.0 3 hours 10 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 2 10.0 8 or more hours 1 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 15.0 60.0 25.0 3.1 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 630 001L1 ONLINE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SERVICES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chan, Lois M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 100.0 4 - 5 hours 3 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 655 001L1 ORGANIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chan, Lois M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 61.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 38.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 14 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 12 85.7 4 - 5 hours 5 35.7 6 - 7 hours 3 21.4 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 13.3 26.7 60.0 3.5 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 13.3 26.7 53.3 3.3 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.0 1.11 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 20.0 66.7 3.5 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 20.0 73.3 3.7 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 645 201L1 PUBLIC LIBRARIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fender, Kim ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 14 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 6 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 13 92.9 4 - 5 hours 3 21.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 30.8 69.2 0.0 2.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 3.2 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 25.0 41.7 33.3 3.1 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 514 201L1 LIT AND RELATED MEDIA FOR YOUNG ADULTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hill, Emmalee ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 7.1 A 12 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 14.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 13 92.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 6 42.9 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 8 57.1 4 - 5 hours 5 35.7 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 6.7 13.3 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.86 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 6.7 33.3 53.3 3.3 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 6.7 0.0 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 7.1 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 16 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 93.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 510 001L1 CHILDRENS LITERATURE AND RELATED MATERIALS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Sandra ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 18.2 Junior 3 13.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 19 82.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.8 Studies Program 1 4.3 2 hours 3 14.3 Required by my major 22 95.7 3 hours 7 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 8 38.1 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 1 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 4.0 12.0 84.0 3.8 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 32.0 64.0 3.6 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 16.0 80.0 3.8 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 13.6 36.4 50.0 3.4 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.28. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 92.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 602 001L1 INFO STORAGE & RETRIEVAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jeng, Ling Hwey ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 42.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 57.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 19 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 10.5 2 hours 1 5.3 Required by my major 17 89.5 3 hours 2 10.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 9 47.4 6 - 7 hours 3 15.8 8 or more hours 4 21.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 10.5 36.8 42.1 10.5 2.5 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 10.5 36.8 42.1 10.5 2.5 0.84 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 31.6 47.4 15.8 2.7 0.81 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 15.8 68.4 10.5 2.8 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 10.5 21.1 63.2 3.4 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 5.3 42.1 47.4 3.3 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 15.8 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 5.3 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 21.1 21.1 47.4 10.5 2.5 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 602 401L1 INFO STORAGE & RETRIEVAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jeng, Ling Hwey ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 60.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 21 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 4.8 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 20 95.2 3 hours 5 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 5 23.8 8 or more hours 9 42.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 18.2 59.1 18.2 2.9 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 13.6 54.5 31.8 3.2 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 33.3 38.1 28.6 3.0 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 4.8 71.4 23.8 3.2 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 84.2 10.5 3.1 0.40 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 31.8 50.0 13.6 2.7 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 638 401L1 INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES AND INFO SERVICES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Joseph ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 56.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 16 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 3 18.8 3 hours 8 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 13 81.3 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 659 201L1 COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rader, Hannelore ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 55.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 45.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 2 11.1 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 16 88.9 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 2 10.0 8 or more hours 1 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 9.5 14.3 38.1 38.1 3.0 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 9.5 23.8 57.1 9.5 2.7 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 9.5 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 600 402L1 INFORMATION IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rogers, Joann V ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 91.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 8.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 23 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 13.0 Studies Program 4 17.4 2 hours 10 43.5 Required by my major 19 82.6 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.7 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 1 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 9.5 14.3 61.9 14.3 2.8 0.81 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 17.4 13.0 60.9 8.7 2.6 0.89 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 30.4 43.5 26.1 3.0 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 31.8 40.9 22.7 2.8 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 23.8 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 25.0 60.0 15.0 2.9 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 28.6 61.9 9.5 2.8 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 47.4 42.1 10.5 2.6 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 21.7 56.5 21.7 3.0 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 31.8 40.9 22.7 2.8 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 8.7 26.1 39.1 26.1 2.8 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 43.5 21.7 30.4 2.8 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 690 401L1 SPECIAL TOPICS IN LIS: PRESERVATION MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ryder, R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 87.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 12.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 16 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 16 100.0 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 645 001L1 PUBLIC LIBRARIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Schabel, Donald ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 15 93.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 12.5 Studies Program 1 6.3 2 hours 9 56.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 15 93.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 6.3 18.8 75.0 3.7 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 6.3 18.8 75.0 3.7 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 94.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 510 002L1 CHILDRENS LITERATURE AND RELATED MATERIALS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shier, Elizabeth M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 31.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 63.2 Junior 4 21.1 C 1 5.3 Senior 14 73.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 10.5 Required by my major 17 94.4 3 hours 4 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 4 21.1 6 - 7 hours 5 26.3 8 or more hours 4 21.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 31.6 52.6 15.8 2.8 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 21.1 68.4 10.5 2.9 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 33.3 44.4 16.7 2.7 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 5.3 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 73.7 15.8 3.1 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 10.5 52.6 31.6 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 76.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 603 401L1 MANAGEMENT IN LIBRARY AND INFO SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Sineath, Timothy W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 58.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 41.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 17 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 16 100.0 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 36.8 42.1 15.8 2.7 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 15.8 68.4 15.8 3.0 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 44.4 38.9 11.1 2.6 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 15.0 65.0 20.0 3.1 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = LIS 510 202L1 CHILDRENS LITERATURE AND RELATED MATERIALS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Stephens, Rebecca ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 30.0 Junior 4 18.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 17 77.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.5 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 4 18.2 Required by my major 21 95.5 3 hours 9 40.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 8 36.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 4.3 13.0 47.8 34.8 3.1 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 4.3 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 22.7 40.9 36.4 3.1 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 13.0 47.8 39.1 3.3 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 21.7 47.8 30.4 3.1 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 13.0 47.8 39.1 3.3 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 13.6 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 27.3 13.6 59.1 3.3 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 85.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 601 001L1 INFO SOURCES & SERVICES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Waldhart, Thomas J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 72.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 9.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 9.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 5 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 27.3 6 - 7 hours 2 18.2 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 0.0 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 3.1 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 601 401L1 INFO SOURCES & SERVICES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Waldhart, Thomas J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 57.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 42.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 19 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 10.5 Required by my major 18 100.0 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 7 36.8 6 - 7 hours 2 10.5 8 or more hours 3 15.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 10.5 10.5 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.88 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 26.3 42.1 26.3 2.9 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 33.3 44.4 16.7 2.7 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 31.6 42.1 21.1 2.8 0.85 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 31.6 42.1 21.1 2.8 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 10.5 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 52.6 15.8 21.1 2.5 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 21.1 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 36.8 42.1 15.8 2.7 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 644 401L1 ADMIN OF SCHL MEDIA CTRS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = White, Jackie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 14.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 8 100.0 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = LIS 647 401L1 CURRENT TRENDS IN SCHOOL MEDIA CENTERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = White, Jackie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 85.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 15.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 17 85.0 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 5 25.0 8 or more hours 5 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 5.0 0.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 4.0 0.22 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 4.0 0.22 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 4.0 0.22 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.31. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 261 001L1 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND WRITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Altman, Dennis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 75.0 Sophomore 4 33.3 B 3 25.0 Junior 8 66.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 7.7 84.6 3.8 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 8.3 83.3 3.8 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 261 002L1 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND WRITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Altman, Dennis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 76.9 Sophomore 7 50.0 B 3 23.1 Junior 5 35.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 13 92.9 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 3 21.4 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 261 003L1 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND WRITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Altman, Dennis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 2 28.6 B 2 28.6 Junior 5 71.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 57.1 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 331 001L1 ADVERTISING CREATIVE STRATEGY & EXECUTION I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Altman, Dennis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 16 100.0 Junior 1 5.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 16 94.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 12 75.0 3 hours 5 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 5.9 5.9 47.1 41.2 3.2 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 81.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 331 002L1 ADVERTISING CREATIVE STRATEGY & EXECUTION I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Altman, Dennis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 30.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 70.0 Junior 4 40.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 70.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 30.0 4 - 5 hours 4 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 331 003L1 ADVERTISING CREATIVE STRATEGY & EXECUTION I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Altman, Dennis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 16.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 66.7 Junior 2 15.4 C 2 16.7 Senior 11 84.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 12 92.3 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 23.1 30.8 46.2 3.2 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 341 401L1 STRATEGIC PUBLIC RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anyaegbunam, Chike ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 76.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 23.1 Junior 4 26.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 53.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 11 78.6 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 21.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 29.4 52.9 17.6 2.9 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 17.6 70.6 11.8 2.9 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 3.2 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 29.4 52.9 17.6 2.9 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 371 001L1 SPECIALIZED PUBLIC RELATIONS WRITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anyaegbunam, Chike ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 14 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 5 38.5 3 hours 6 46.2 Other (e.g. elective) 8 61.5 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ISC 311 403L1 ETHICS AND THE STRATEGIC COMMUNICATOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crawley, Bruce ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 73.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 26.7 Junior 11 73.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 26.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 60.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 14 100.0 3 hours 1 6.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 6.7 66.7 20.0 3.0 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 6.3 25.0 56.3 12.5 2.8 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 6.3 31.3 50.0 12.5 2.7 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ISC 489 003L1 TOP STDS IN MASS MEDIA PROFES: E-COMMERCE III INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dotson, Bill ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 54.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 27.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 18.2 Senior 12 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 27.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 3 27.3 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 72.7 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 27.3 36.4 36.4 3.1 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 8.3 8.3 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 9.1 36.4 45.5 3.2 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ISC 321 401L1 RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE ISC PROFESSIONAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hall, Leanna ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 50.0 Junior 4 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 5 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 14.3 7.1 78.6 0.0 2.6 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 92.9 7.1 3.1 0.27 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 28.6 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 50.0 35.7 7.1 2.4 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 14 7.1 0.0 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 23.1 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 92.9 7.1 3.1 0.27 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 14.3 42.9 35.7 7.1 2.4 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 161 001L1 INTRO TO INTEGRATED STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hertog, James K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 14.6 Sophomore 32 65.3 B 25 52.1 Junior 15 30.6 C 13 27.1 Senior 2 4.1 D 3 6.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 29.2 Required by my major 41 83.7 3 hours 15 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 16.3 4 - 5 hours 6 12.5 6 - 7 hours 5 10.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 58 1.7 31.0 60.3 6.9 2.7 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 58 5.2 12.1 53.4 29.3 3.1 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 56 5.4 23.2 62.5 8.9 2.8 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 58 19.0 32.8 44.8 3.4 2.3 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 57 5.3 22.8 68.4 3.5 2.7 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 57 1.8 14.0 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 58 0.0 6.9 70.7 22.4 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 58 10.3 27.6 56.9 5.2 2.6 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 58 22.4 46.6 27.6 3.4 2.1 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 58 3.4 8.6 72.4 15.5 3.0 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 52 3.8 15.4 71.2 9.6 2.9 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 57 14.0 17.5 63.2 5.3 2.6 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 58 24.1 44.8 25.9 5.2 2.1 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 58 12.1 36.2 50.0 1.7 2.4 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 52 0.0 30.8 65.4 3.8 2.7 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 57 7.0 29.8 50.9 12.3 2.7 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 55 7.3 38.2 45.5 9.1 2.6 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 57 3.5 15.8 66.7 14.0 2.9 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 56 17.9 33.9 35.7 12.5 2.4 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 57 12.3 36.8 38.6 12.3 2.5 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 57 29.8 42.1 24.6 3.5 2.0 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 110 Number of forms scanned = 58 Number of forms with at least one student response = 58 Percent completed = 52.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ISC 351 401L1 ISC MANAGEMENT: THE CASE APPROACH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hickman, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 93.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 6.3 Junior 4 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 43.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 14 87.5 3 hours 2 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 42.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ISC 361 401L1 DIR RESPONSE TARGETING: MEDIA/DATABASE MGMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Osborne, Phil ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 50.0 Junior 2 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 22 91.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.8 Studies Program 1 4.2 2 hours 8 33.3 Required by my major 14 58.3 3 hours 10 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 9 37.5 4 - 5 hours 1 4.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 25.0 70.8 3.7 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 8.3 20.8 70.8 3.6 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 4.2 20.8 70.8 3.6 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 321 001L1 RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE ISC PROFESSIONAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whitlow, S S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 1 5.9 B 10 62.5 Junior 8 47.1 C 1 6.3 Senior 8 47.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 7 43.8 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 5.6 22.2 33.3 38.9 3.1 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 22.2 5.6 33.3 38.9 2.9 1.18 14. Encouraged class participation 17 11.8 5.9 35.3 47.1 3.2 1.01 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 28.6 35.7 35.7 3.1 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 25.0 6.3 37.5 31.3 2.8 1.18 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 11.1 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 5.6 27.8 61.1 3.4 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 321 002L1 RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE ISC PROFESSIONAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whitlow, S S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 41.7 Junior 5 41.7 C 2 16.7 Senior 7 58.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 66.7 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ISC 491 401L1 ISC CAMPAIGNS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whitlow, S S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 21 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 9.5 2 hours 2 9.5 Required by my major 19 90.5 3 hours 2 9.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 4 19.0 8 or more hours 11 52.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 4.5 9.1 86.4 3.8 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 301 001L1 NEWS REPORTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Braden, Maria ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 25.0 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 8 66.7 Junior 5 38.5 C 1 8.3 Senior 7 53.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 10 83.3 3 hours 6 46.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 16.7 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 20.0 33.3 46.7 3.3 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 13.3 26.7 60.0 3.5 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 14.3 14.3 35.7 35.7 2.9 1.07 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 0.0 57.1 35.7 3.2 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 6.7 13.3 20.0 60.0 3.3 0.98 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 6.7 20.0 66.7 3.5 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 88.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 409 001L1 MAGAZINE ARTICLE WRITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Braden, Maria ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 66.7 Junior 2 22.2 C 1 11.1 Senior 7 77.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 5 55.6 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 4 44.4 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 532 001L1 ETHICS OF JOU & MASS COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Braden, Maria ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 33.3 Junior 1 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 33.3 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 5 41.7 Required by my major 5 41.7 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 50.0 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 15.4 46.2 30.8 3.0 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 302 001L1 RADIO/TV NEWS REPORTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cappe, Yvonne ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 7 87.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 7 87.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 3 37.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 16.7 0.0 41.7 41.7 3.1 1.08 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 8.3 0.0 25.0 66.7 3.5 0.90 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 8.3 0.0 33.3 58.3 3.4 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 0.0 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.93 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 8.3 0.0 33.3 58.3 3.4 0.90 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 0.0 25.0 66.7 3.5 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 8.3 0.0 8.3 83.3 3.7 0.89 11. Was available for consultation 12 8.3 0.0 8.3 83.3 3.7 0.89 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 8.3 0.0 16.7 75.0 3.6 0.90 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 8.3 0.0 25.0 66.7 3.5 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 12 8.3 8.3 8.3 75.0 3.5 1.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 8.3 0.0 33.3 58.3 3.4 0.90 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 8.3 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.97 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 0.0 25.0 66.7 3.5 0.90 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 404 001L1 ADV TV NEWS: JAT NEWS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cappe, Yvonne ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 90.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 9.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 5 45.5 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 2 18.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 7.1 0.0 14.3 78.6 3.6 0.84 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 7.1 14.3 71.4 3.5 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 0.0 7.1 85.7 3.7 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 63.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 497 001L1 SP TOPS JOU: TV PRODUCING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cappe, Yvonne ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 9.1 Junior 5 45.5 C 1 9.1 Senior 6 54.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 27.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 5 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 8 80.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 330 001L1 WEB PUBLISHING/DESIGN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dailey, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 72.7 Sophomore 1 9.1 B 3 27.3 Junior 1 9.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 81.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 27.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 2 18.2 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 9 81.8 4 - 5 hours 2 18.2 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 0.0 18.2 72.7 3.5 0.93 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 61.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = JOU 387 401L1 PHOTOJOURNALISM I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garrison, Ron ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 36.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 54.5 Junior 1 9.1 C 1 9.1 Senior 8 72.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 18.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 3 27.3 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 72.7 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 37.5 25.0 37.5 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 8.3 0.0 33.3 58.3 3.4 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 8.3 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = JOU 499 402L1 ADV WRITING MASS MEDIA: FINE ART OF WRITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hawpe, David ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 33.3 Senior 6 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 33.3 Required by my major 3 50.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 50.0 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = JOU 330 401L1 WEB PUBLISHING/DESIGN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jones, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 40.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 60.0 4 - 5 hours 3 30.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 2 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 497 002L1 SP TOPS JOU:FIRST AMENDMENT/INTERNET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Labunski, Richard ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 4 36.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 63.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 54.5 Required by my major 3 27.3 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 72.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 25.0 16.7 58.3 3.3 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 531 001L1 MEDIA LAW AND ETHICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Labunski, Richard ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 39.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 56.5 Junior 14 58.3 C 1 4.3 Senior 10 41.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 8.3 Required by my major 23 95.8 3 hours 7 29.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.2 4 - 5 hours 11 45.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 12.0 52.0 36.0 3.2 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 4.0 4.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 8.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 4.0 8.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 76.0 24.0 3.2 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 4.0 48.0 44.0 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 12.0 56.0 28.0 3.1 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 12.5 20.8 66.7 3.5 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 8.3 29.2 62.5 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 80.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 531 201L1 MEDIA LAW AND ETHICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moore, Roy L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 4 50.0 C 1 14.3 Senior 4 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 8 100.0 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 303 001L1 NEWS EDITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Orndorff, Robert L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 30.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 60.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 9 90.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 3 30.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 410 001L1 PUBLICATIONS PRODUCTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Orndorff, Robert L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 40.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 4 40.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 60.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 10.0 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 415 001L1 DESIGN AND LAYOUT: ILLUSTRATOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Orndorff, Robert L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 28.6 14.3 57.1 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 46.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 415 002L1 DESIGN AND LAYOUT: QUARKXPRESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Orndorff, Robert L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 40.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 415 003L1 DESIGN AND LAYOUT: PHOTOSHOP INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Orndorff, Robert L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 28.6 14.3 57.1 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 46.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 101 001L1 INTRO TO JOURNALISM: PRINT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ryan, Buck ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 16.7 A 11 91.7 Sophomore 6 50.0 B 1 8.3 Junior 2 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 41.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 50.0 Required by my major 11 91.7 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 48.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 101 002L1 INTRO TO JOURNALISM: BROADCAST INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ryan, Buck ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 85.0 Sophomore 15 75.0 B 1 5.0 Junior 5 25.0 C 2 10.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 45.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 18 90.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 4.2 0.0 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 12.5 45.8 41.7 3.3 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 4.2 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 4.2 37.5 54.2 3.4 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 13.0 34.8 52.2 3.4 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 4.2 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 4.2 29.2 62.5 3.5 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 12.5 20.8 66.7 3.5 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 8.7 43.5 47.8 3.4 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 8.3 37.5 50.0 3.3 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 8.7 30.4 60.9 3.5 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 13.0 17.4 69.6 3.6 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 101 003L1 INTRO TO JOURNALISM: SPORTS/PR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ryan, Buck ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 2 40.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 3 60.0 C 1 20.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 40.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 30.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 204 003L1 WRITING FOR MASS MEDIA: BROADCAST INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ryan, Elizabeth H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 23.1 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 10 76.9 Junior 8 61.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 15.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 23.1 Required by my major 12 92.3 3 hours 8 61.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 7.7 30.8 53.8 3.3 0.95 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 304 001L1 BROADCAST NEWS DECISION MAKING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ryan, Elizabeth H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 21.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 57.1 Junior 5 35.7 C 3 21.4 Senior 9 64.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 7.1 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 13 92.9 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 0.0 58.8 35.3 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 5.9 0.0 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 23.5 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 41.2 29.4 23.5 2.7 0.92 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 5.9 17.6 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 35.3 41.2 23.5 2.9 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 23.5 35.3 29.4 2.8 1.01 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 7.7 0.0 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 17.6 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 5.9 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 11.8 17.6 29.4 41.2 3.0 1.06. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 94.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = JOU 535 001L1 HISTORY OF JOURNALISM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ryan, Elizabeth H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 60.0 Junior 4 44.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 4 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 3.3 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = TEL 101 001L1 TELECOM I: MASS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baker, Sean ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 16.7 A 11 36.7 Sophomore 14 46.7 B 16 53.3 Junior 7 23.3 C 3 10.0 Senior 4 13.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 33.3 Studies Program 1 3.4 2 hours 11 36.7 Required by my major 18 62.1 3 hours 3 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 34.5 4 - 5 hours 5 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 5.7 57.1 37.1 3.3 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 8.3 16.7 44.4 30.6 3.0 0.91 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 14.3 57.1 25.7 3.1 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 11.1 63.9 25.0 3.1 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 2.8 50.0 47.2 3.4 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 2.9 65.7 31.4 3.3 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 11.1 69.4 19.4 3.1 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 2.8 52.8 44.4 3.4 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 0.0 59.4 40.6 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 5.7 60.0 34.3 3.3 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 11.1 16.7 52.8 19.4 2.8 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 36 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 21.9 65.6 12.5 2.9 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 2.9 25.7 45.7 25.7 2.9 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 3.3 26.7 53.3 16.7 2.8 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 13.9 52.8 33.3 3.2 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 11.1 16.7 50.0 22.2 2.8 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 5.6 19.4 52.8 22.2 2.9 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 5.6 33.3 36.1 25.0 2.8 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 54 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = TEL 320 001L1 TELECOM PGRM ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baker, Sean ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 6 40.0 C 1 6.7 Senior 9 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 46.7 Required by my major 11 73.3 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 26.7 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 31.3 50.0 18.8 2.9 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 18.8 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 40.0 46.7 6.7 2.5 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 26.7 66.7 6.7 2.8 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = TEL 555 401L1 CYBERSPACE AND COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baker, Sean ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 16.7 Senior 12 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 41.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 16.7 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 83.3 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = TEL 201 001L1 TELECOM II: INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 9.7 A 8 25.8 Sophomore 12 38.7 B 18 58.1 Junior 12 38.7 C 5 16.1 Senior 4 12.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 22.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 48.4 Required by my major 21 67.7 3 hours 7 22.6 Other (e.g. elective) 10 32.3 4 - 5 hours 2 6.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 0.0 10.0 57.5 32.5 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 0.0 5.0 47.5 47.5 3.4 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 0.0 0.0 57.5 42.5 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 2.6 33.3 46.2 17.9 2.8 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 0.0 0.0 56.4 43.6 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 0.0 2.5 42.5 55.0 3.5 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 2.6 47.4 50.0 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 2.5 0.0 45.0 52.5 3.5 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 2.5 52.5 45.0 3.4 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 0.0 5.1 71.8 23.1 3.2 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 7.5 62.5 30.0 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 2.8 5.6 72.2 19.4 3.1 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 2.5 57.5 40.0 3.4 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 5.0 42.5 52.5 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 0.0 2.5 25.0 72.5 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = TEL 355 001L1 COMM AND INFO SYSTEMS IN ORGANIZATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 17.4 Sophomore 2 9.1 B 15 65.2 Junior 4 18.2 C 4 17.4 Senior 16 72.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 31.8 Required by my major 16 72.7 3 hours 10 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 6 27.3 4 - 5 hours 5 22.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 8.7 26.1 65.2 3.6 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 17.4 39.1 39.1 3.1 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 88.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = TEL 432 401L1 AUDIO PRODUCTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 2 28.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 71.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 1 14.3 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 4 57.1 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 43.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = TEL 312 401L1 VIDEO PRODUCTION I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = LeVeque Jr, Paul N ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 58.3 Junior 3 25.0 C 2 16.7 Senior 9 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 58.3 Required by my major 7 58.3 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 41.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 7.7 15.4 46.2 30.8 3.0 0.91 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 15.4 15.4 53.8 15.4 2.7 0.95 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = TEL 312 402L1 VIDEO PRODUCTION I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = LeVeque Jr, Paul N ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 62.5 Junior 2 25.0 C 1 12.5 Senior 6 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 50.0 Required by my major 5 62.5 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 37.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 14.3 0.0 85.7 0.0 2.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 57.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = TEL 504 401L1 MEDIA ORGANIZATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Weller, Dave ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 50.0 Sophomore 1 5.0 B 10 50.0 Junior 3 15.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 16 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 40.0 Required by my major 7 35.0 3 hours 3 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 13 65.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 20.0 65.0 15.0 3.0 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 15.0 45.0 40.0 3.3 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = TEL 300 001L1 TELECOM RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Yan, Michael ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 14.8 Sophomore 1 3.6 B 11 40.7 Junior 12 42.9 C 10 37.0 Senior 15 53.6 D 2 7.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 18.5 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 8 29.6 Required by my major 27 96.4 3 hours 9 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 11.1 6 - 7 hours 2 7.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 10.7 78.6 10.7 3.0 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 11.1 14.8 55.6 18.5 2.8 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 3.7 11.1 77.8 7.4 2.9 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 14.8 77.8 7.4 2.9 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 25.0 64.3 10.7 2.9 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 3.6 14.3 71.4 10.7 2.9 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 3.6 82.1 14.3 3.1 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 32.1 57.1 10.7 2.8 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 14.3 46.4 35.7 3.6 2.3 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 10.7 25.0 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 25.9 48.1 18.5 7.4 2.1 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 27 7.4 33.3 51.9 7.4 2.6 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 17.4 26.1 47.8 8.7 2.5 0.90 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 25.0 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 7.1 35.7 50.0 7.1 2.6 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 3.6 21.4 64.3 10.7 2.8 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 35.7 39.3 17.9 7.1 2.0 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 22.2 44.4 29.6 3.7 2.1 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 7.4 51.9 37.0 3.7 2.4 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = TEL 390 001S1 TELECOM TOP SEM:ISSUES IN NEW TECH & MASS MEDIA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Yan, Michael ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 10.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 90.0 Junior 3 30.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 70.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 40.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 8 80.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 2.4 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 10.0 0.0 80.0 10.0 2.9 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 10.0 0.0 70.0 20.0 3.0 0.82 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 20.0 20.0 50.0 10.0 2.5 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 10 10.0 10.0 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.88 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 12.5 0.0 75.0 12.5 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 22.2 22.2 44.4 11.1 2.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 22.2 0.0 55.6 22.2 2.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************