UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies DEPARTMENT = ROTC SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 25 27.2 A 35 38.5 Sophomore 23 25.0 B 14 15.4 Junior 17 18.5 C 1 1.1 Senior 27 29.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 41 45.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 36 39.1 Studies Program 1 1.1 2 hours 21 22.8 Required by my major 6 6.5 3 hours 17 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 85 92.4 4 - 5 hours 9 9.8 6 - 7 hours 3 3.3 8 or more hours 6 6.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 95 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 78 0.0 5.1 32.1 62.8 3.6 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 86 0.0 2.3 37.2 60.5 3.6 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 87 0.0 1.1 28.7 70.1 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 90 0.0 3.3 27.8 68.9 3.7 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 88 0.0 0.0 30.7 69.3 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 86 0.0 0.0 25.6 74.4 3.7 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 84 0.0 2.4 21.4 76.2 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 96 0.0 5.2 27.1 67.7 3.6 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 96 0.0 1.0 21.9 77.1 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 96 0.0 0.0 22.9 77.1 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 95 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 96 1.0 5.2 22.9 70.8 3.6 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 95 0.0 2.1 23.2 74.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 94 0.0 2.1 34.0 63.8 3.6 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 93 0.0 5.4 32.3 62.4 3.6 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 91 0.0 3.3 33.0 63.7 3.6 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 95 0.0 1.1 30.5 68.4 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 94 0.0 10.6 26.6 62.8 3.5 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 95 0.0 2.1 26.3 71.6 3.7 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 96 1.0 3.1 25.0 70.8 3.7 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 119 Number of forms scanned = 102 Number of forms with at least one student response = 97 Percent completed = 81.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Biotechnology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 32 47.1 A 63 94.0 Sophomore 10 14.7 B 2 3.0 Junior 15 22.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 16.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 3.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 47 69.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 17.6 Required by my major 67 97.1 3 hours 6 8.8 Other (e.g. elective) 2 2.9 4 - 5 hours 2 2.9 6 - 7 hours 1 1.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 75 0.0 1.3 33.3 65.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 14.3 42.9 38.1 3.1 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 60 0.0 6.7 58.3 35.0 3.3 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 65 0.0 0.0 44.6 55.4 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 68 0.0 2.9 52.9 44.1 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 60 5.0 10.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.84 8. Graded assignments included comments 57 0.0 3.5 52.6 43.9 3.4 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 68 0.0 2.9 41.2 55.9 3.5 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 70 0.0 1.4 27.1 71.4 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 71 0.0 1.4 29.6 69.0 3.7 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 71 0.0 1.4 38.0 60.6 3.6 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 69 1.4 8.7 39.1 50.7 3.4 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 72 0.0 2.8 26.4 70.8 3.7 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 66 0.0 3.0 56.1 40.9 3.4 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 70 0.0 4.3 57.1 38.6 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 65 0.0 6.2 61.5 32.3 3.3 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 70 0.0 1.4 37.1 61.4 3.6 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 67 3.0 11.9 35.8 49.3 3.3 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 73 2.7 12.3 30.1 54.8 3.4 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 73 1.4 2.7 27.4 68.5 3.6 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 28. Guided student report preparation 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 100 Number of forms scanned = 76 Number of forms with at least one student response = 75 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 32 6.3 A 245 47.7 Sophomore 63 12.3 B 214 41.6 Junior 150 29.3 C 49 9.5 Senior 251 49.0 D 5 1.0 Graduate 15 2.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.2 Pass or Audit 1 0.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 149 29.0 Studies Program 122 24.0 2 hours 177 34.5 Required by my major 267 52.6 3 hours 124 24.2 Other (e.g. elective) 119 23.4 4 - 5 hours 47 9.2 6 - 7 hours 12 2.3 8 or more hours 4 0.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 553 0.4 2.0 51.2 46.5 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 501 5.0 15.4 53.9 25.7 3.0 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 544 1.5 2.8 58.5 37.3 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 515 0.8 4.7 53.4 41.2 3.3 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 549 2.4 4.0 48.8 44.8 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 546 1.8 5.5 51.1 41.6 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 547 2.9 5.3 47.7 44.1 3.3 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 542 1.5 7.6 53.1 37.8 3.3 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 553 2.5 7.1 48.5 42.0 3.3 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 552 0.5 2.2 38.6 58.7 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 529 0.4 2.1 50.9 46.7 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 552 1.4 4.0 46.6 48.0 3.4 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 548 4.2 11.9 48.0 35.9 3.2 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 552 0.9 2.2 44.6 52.4 3.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 520 2.1 8.1 59.2 30.6 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 548 1.8 5.7 59.1 33.4 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 534 1.5 9.4 58.2 30.9 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 551 1.3 3.3 57.7 37.7 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 541 4.1 21.1 48.4 26.4 3.0 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 549 2.0 11.8 47.0 39.2 3.2 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 548 2.4 8.4 31.8 57.5 3.4 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 138 1.4 14.5 63.0 21.0 3.0 0.64 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 166 0.0 6.6 62.0 31.3 3.2 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 152 2.0 3.9 61.8 32.2 3.2 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 98 0.0 11.2 58.2 30.6 3.2 0.62 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 125 4.8 12.0 60.8 22.4 3.0 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 23 4.3 4.3 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.75 28. Guided student report preparation 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 29. Students free to express opinions 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 20 5.0 5.0 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.72 33. Amount of work appropriate 21 4.8 4.8 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.70 34. Instructor explained expectations 20 5.0 5.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.69 35. Instructor helped with my problems 19 5.3 10.5 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.78 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 19 5.3 5.3 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.71 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 673 Number of forms scanned = 554 Number of forms with at least one student response = 554 Percent completed = 82.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 61 89.7 Sophomore 1 1.5 B 7 10.3 Junior 6 9.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 31 46.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 29 43.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 23.5 Studies Program 1 1.5 2 hours 23 33.8 Required by my major 57 83.8 3 hours 12 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 10 14.7 4 - 5 hours 5 7.4 6 - 7 hours 5 7.4 8 or more hours 7 10.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 71 0.0 1.4 40.8 57.7 3.6 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 0.0 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 67 0.0 1.5 47.8 50.7 3.5 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 0.0 2.4 45.2 52.4 3.5 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 65 0.0 3.1 30.8 66.2 3.6 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 69 0.0 4.3 49.3 46.4 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 61 9.8 16.4 27.9 45.9 3.1 1.01 8. Graded assignments included comments 62 1.6 1.6 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 69 0.0 4.3 40.6 55.1 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 70 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 66 0.0 0.0 30.3 69.7 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 70 0.0 4.3 35.7 60.0 3.6 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 70 0.0 4.3 37.1 58.6 3.5 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 70 0.0 2.9 37.1 60.0 3.6 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 70 1.4 2.9 40.0 55.7 3.5 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 70 1.4 4.3 35.7 58.6 3.5 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 68 1.5 4.4 36.8 57.4 3.5 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 71 1.4 1.4 35.2 62.0 3.6 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 68 1.5 8.8 38.2 51.5 3.4 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 71 0.0 4.2 25.4 70.4 3.7 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 71 1.4 5.6 25.4 67.6 3.6 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 88 Number of forms scanned = 71 Number of forms with at least one student response = 71 Percent completed = 80.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Animal Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 66 21.2 A 143 46.3 Sophomore 14 4.5 B 133 43.0 Junior 75 24.0 C 28 9.1 Senior 94 30.1 D 2 0.6 Graduate 58 18.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 4 1.3 Pass or Audit 3 1.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 77 24.7 Studies Program 9 2.9 2 hours 98 31.4 Required by my major 248 79.5 3 hours 76 24.4 Other (e.g. elective) 55 17.6 4 - 5 hours 41 13.1 6 - 7 hours 10 3.2 8 or more hours 10 3.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 339 0.3 0.0 52.5 47.2 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 251 3.6 19.5 47.0 29.9 3.0 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 313 1.0 7.0 62.0 30.0 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 334 0.3 6.0 51.5 42.2 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 339 0.3 5.6 55.8 38.3 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 320 0.6 2.2 54.7 42.5 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 335 0.3 6.0 57.6 36.1 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 318 1.6 15.4 54.1 28.9 3.1 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 335 1.5 10.1 50.1 38.2 3.3 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 337 0.6 2.4 39.2 57.9 3.5 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 317 0.3 1.6 51.7 46.4 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 336 0.3 3.3 50.6 45.8 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 334 1.8 12.9 46.1 39.2 3.2 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 332 1.2 7.5 42.5 48.8 3.4 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 298 1.3 7.4 60.1 31.2 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 320 0.9 8.1 57.2 33.8 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 309 1.6 12.3 56.3 29.8 3.1 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 334 0.9 2.4 59.0 37.7 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 330 3.3 19.7 47.0 30.0 3.0 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 334 1.5 10.2 45.2 43.1 3.3 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 330 1.8 9.4 42.7 46.1 3.3 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 53 1.9 7.5 52.8 37.7 3.3 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 54 7.4 7.4 44.4 40.7 3.2 0.87 34. Instructor explained expectations 54 1.9 5.6 55.6 37.0 3.3 0.66 35. Instructor helped with my problems 50 2.0 10.0 44.0 44.0 3.3 0.74 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 50 2.0 6.0 50.0 42.0 3.3 0.68 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 456 Number of forms scanned = 342 Number of forms with at least one student response = 340 Percent completed = 74.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Biosystems and Ag Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 7.6 A 84 59.2 Sophomore 3 2.1 B 47 33.1 Junior 35 24.1 C 9 6.3 Senior 82 56.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 14 9.7 E/Fail 1 0.7 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 0.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 38 26.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 36 24.8 Required by my major 115 81.0 3 hours 36 24.8 Other (e.g. elective) 27 19.0 4 - 5 hours 19 13.1 6 - 7 hours 11 7.6 8 or more hours 5 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 152 0.0 2.6 53.9 43.4 3.4 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 123 4.9 15.4 50.4 29.3 3.0 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 149 0.7 3.4 54.4 41.6 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 127 0.0 3.9 52.8 43.3 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 149 0.7 4.0 49.7 45.6 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 149 0.7 4.7 47.0 47.7 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 145 4.1 8.3 53.8 33.8 3.2 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 140 1.4 11.4 52.1 35.0 3.2 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 151 2.0 8.6 48.3 41.1 3.3 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 152 1.3 5.3 39.5 53.9 3.5 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 151 0.7 2.6 41.7 55.0 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 151 1.3 7.9 43.0 47.7 3.4 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 149 2.7 17.4 42.3 37.6 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 151 0.7 6.6 45.0 47.7 3.4 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 106 0.9 3.8 59.4 35.8 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 147 0.7 4.8 47.6 46.9 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 144 0.7 3.5 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 149 0.7 4.7 49.0 45.6 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 142 5.6 26.1 46.5 21.8 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 152 1.3 10.5 50.7 37.5 3.2 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 152 2.0 10.5 39.5 48.0 3.3 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 33. Amount of work appropriate 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 34. Instructor explained expectations 24 4.2 8.3 45.8 41.7 3.3 0.79 35. Instructor helped with my problems 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 167 Number of forms scanned = 152 Number of forms with at least one student response = 152 Percent completed = 91.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Entomology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 12.0 A 95 51.4 Sophomore 21 11.5 B 69 37.3 Junior 51 27.9 C 16 8.6 Senior 57 31.1 D 2 1.1 Graduate 30 16.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 1.1 Pass or Audit 3 1.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 47 25.5 Studies Program 33 18.1 2 hours 61 33.2 Required by my major 115 63.2 3 hours 46 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 34 18.7 4 - 5 hours 20 10.9 6 - 7 hours 6 3.3 8 or more hours 4 2.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 192 0.0 0.5 46.9 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 154 1.9 7.1 50.6 40.3 3.3 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 168 0.6 6.5 52.4 40.5 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 175 1.1 1.7 36.6 60.6 3.6 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 183 1.6 2.2 36.1 60.1 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 172 2.3 2.3 42.4 52.9 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 176 0.0 1.7 38.1 60.2 3.6 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 180 1.1 5.0 54.4 39.4 3.3 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 184 0.5 4.9 38.6 56.0 3.5 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 190 0.0 2.1 26.8 71.1 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 183 0.0 2.7 41.0 56.3 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 191 0.5 3.1 44.0 52.4 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 192 4.2 6.8 46.9 42.2 3.3 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 187 1.6 10.7 50.8 36.9 3.2 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 156 0.0 9.0 58.3 32.7 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 180 1.1 6.7 54.4 37.8 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 169 3.0 10.1 54.4 32.5 3.2 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 192 0.0 3.1 46.4 50.5 3.5 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 188 3.7 18.6 46.8 30.9 3.0 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 191 0.5 4.2 44.0 51.3 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 191 1.6 4.2 34.0 60.2 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 49 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 52 0.0 21.2 57.7 21.2 3.0 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 49 2.0 0.0 53.1 44.9 3.4 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 25 8.0 12.0 52.0 28.0 3.0 0.87 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 26 7.7 11.5 50.0 30.8 3.0 0.87 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 28. Guided student report preparation 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 29. Students free to express opinions 17 0.0 5.9 17.6 76.5 3.7 0.59 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 17 5.9 0.0 41.2 52.9 3.4 0.80 31. Developed abil to conduct research 14 0.0 28.6 21.4 50.0 3.2 0.89 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 68 1.5 2.9 45.6 50.0 3.4 0.63 33. Amount of work appropriate 70 4.3 12.9 45.7 37.1 3.2 0.81 34. Instructor explained expectations 70 2.9 8.6 44.3 44.3 3.3 0.75 35. Instructor helped with my problems 68 2.9 2.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.69 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 67 0.0 1.5 44.8 53.7 3.5 0.53 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 253 Number of forms scanned = 193 Number of forms with at least one student response = 192 Percent completed = 75.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Forestry SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 3.7 A 108 49.8 Sophomore 23 10.6 B 90 41.5 Junior 37 17.1 C 15 6.9 Senior 109 50.2 D 1 0.5 Graduate 36 16.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 3 1.4 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.5 Pass or Audit 3 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 47 21.7 Studies Program 16 7.4 2 hours 60 27.6 Required by my major 148 68.2 3 hours 56 25.8 Other (e.g. elective) 53 24.4 4 - 5 hours 48 22.1 6 - 7 hours 5 2.3 8 or more hours 1 0.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 230 0.4 0.9 53.9 44.8 3.4 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 171 5.8 24.0 49.1 21.1 2.9 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 202 0.0 7.9 52.5 39.6 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 201 1.0 3.5 45.8 49.8 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 216 0.5 4.6 45.8 49.1 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 206 0.0 4.9 54.4 40.8 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 212 0.5 8.0 51.4 40.1 3.3 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 199 3.0 12.1 50.8 34.2 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 230 0.9 7.0 43.5 48.7 3.4 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 231 0.0 0.9 29.9 69.3 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 217 0.0 4.1 43.8 52.1 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 230 0.4 1.7 42.6 55.2 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 230 1.3 9.1 40.9 48.7 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 229 0.4 6.6 47.2 45.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 187 0.0 7.5 61.5 31.0 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 228 0.4 5.7 57.9 36.0 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 213 0.5 9.9 56.3 33.3 3.2 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 230 0.0 3.0 52.2 44.8 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 226 4.4 16.8 43.8 35.0 3.1 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 230 1.3 11.7 36.5 50.4 3.4 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 230 0.9 9.6 26.5 63.0 3.5 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 20 5.0 5.0 55.0 35.0 3.2 0.77 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 69 1.4 13.0 52.2 33.3 3.2 0.71 33. Amount of work appropriate 74 1.4 2.7 66.2 29.7 3.2 0.57 34. Instructor explained expectations 74 0.0 12.2 54.1 33.8 3.2 0.65 35. Instructor helped with my problems 70 1.4 8.6 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 65 4.6 7.7 53.8 33.8 3.2 0.76 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 37 8.1 43.2 18.9 18.9 10.8 2.8 1.17 38. Question 38 37 2.7 29.7 18.9 35.1 13.5 3.3 1.12 39. Question 39 35 2.9 5.7 5.7 57.1 28.6 4.0 0.92 40. Question 40 29 31.0 20.7 13.8 27.6 6.9 2.6 1.38 41. Question 41 36 5.6 22.2 8.3 50.0 13.9 3.4 1.16 42. Question 42 35 2.9 2.9 17.1 57.1 20.0 3.9 0.87 43. Question 43 35 2.9 2.9 22.9 40.0 31.4 3.9 0.97 44. Question 44 37 0.0 2.7 10.8 54.1 32.4 4.2 0.73 45. Question 45 36 0.0 8.3 11.1 47.2 33.3 4.1 0.89 Number of forms preslugged = at least 323 Number of forms scanned = 231 Number of forms with at least one student response = 231 Percent completed = 71.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ZAgriculture GENERAL and CEX SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 20 9.8 A 164 80.4 Sophomore 32 15.7 B 28 13.7 Junior 62 30.4 C 9 4.4 Senior 80 39.2 D 2 1.0 Graduate 9 4.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.5 Pass or Audit 1 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 81 39.9 Studies Program 16 8.0 2 hours 57 28.1 Required by my major 129 64.2 3 hours 38 18.7 Other (e.g. elective) 56 27.9 4 - 5 hours 12 5.9 6 - 7 hours 1 0.5 8 or more hours 14 6.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 231 0.4 1.3 44.6 53.7 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 132 4.5 9.1 51.5 34.8 3.2 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 228 0.9 3.9 57.5 37.7 3.3 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 158 2.5 1.3 51.3 44.9 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 224 0.4 2.2 49.1 48.2 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 224 0.4 3.1 47.3 49.1 3.5 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 211 0.5 2.8 50.2 46.4 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 209 0.5 7.2 49.8 42.6 3.3 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 231 2.2 3.9 45.9 48.1 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 232 0.9 1.3 35.3 62.5 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 221 0.5 1.4 45.2 52.9 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 232 0.9 2.6 45.7 50.9 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 230 2.2 7.8 45.7 44.3 3.3 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 232 0.4 1.3 37.1 61.2 3.6 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 230 0.9 4.3 46.1 48.7 3.4 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 227 1.3 5.7 42.3 50.7 3.4 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 218 1.4 8.7 48.6 41.3 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 227 0.9 2.6 44.9 51.5 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 224 3.1 12.1 45.5 39.3 3.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 231 3.5 6.9 37.7 51.9 3.4 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 229 2.6 3.1 31.4 62.9 3.5 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 36 2.8 8.3 58.3 30.6 3.2 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 40 5.0 10.0 52.5 32.5 3.1 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 38 7.9 13.2 42.1 36.8 3.1 0.91 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 29 6.9 3.4 51.7 37.9 3.2 0.82 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 27 3.7 7.4 51.9 37.0 3.2 0.75 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 33. Amount of work appropriate 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 34. Instructor explained expectations 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 35. Instructor helped with my problems 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 288 Number of forms scanned = 232 Number of forms with at least one student response = 232 Percent completed = 80.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Landscape Architecture SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 1.4 A 52 37.1 Sophomore 41 28.5 B 79 56.4 Junior 30 20.8 C 8 5.7 Senior 68 47.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 0.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.7 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.7 Pass or Audit 1 0.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 4.2 Studies Program 1 0.7 2 hours 10 6.9 Required by my major 139 96.5 3 hours 11 7.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 2.8 4 - 5 hours 17 11.8 6 - 7 hours 12 8.3 8 or more hours 88 61.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 155 0.6 3.9 60.6 34.8 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 107 2.8 24.3 51.4 21.5 2.9 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 146 2.1 5.5 45.9 46.6 3.4 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 92 0.0 6.5 54.3 39.1 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 153 2.0 9.8 56.9 31.4 3.2 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 151 0.7 6.6 64.2 28.5 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 141 0.7 11.3 56.7 31.2 3.2 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 144 0.0 6.9 45.8 47.2 3.4 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 155 3.2 11.6 40.6 44.5 3.3 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 156 0.0 0.6 37.8 61.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 153 0.0 1.3 47.7 51.0 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 154 2.6 7.8 41.6 48.1 3.4 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 155 1.3 9.0 39.4 50.3 3.4 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 155 1.3 1.9 43.2 53.5 3.5 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 146 0.7 6.2 47.3 45.9 3.4 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 153 1.3 3.9 44.4 50.3 3.4 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 152 0.7 4.6 46.7 48.0 3.4 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 156 1.9 2.6 41.7 53.8 3.5 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 151 1.3 7.3 47.7 43.7 3.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 155 1.9 7.1 31.6 59.4 3.5 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 155 3.9 11.0 31.0 54.2 3.4 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 166 Number of forms scanned = 157 Number of forms with at least one student response = 157 Percent completed = 94.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant and Soil Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 26 6.4 A 183 45.2 Sophomore 53 13.1 B 168 41.5 Junior 100 24.6 C 49 12.1 Senior 147 36.2 D 1 0.2 Graduate 72 17.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 7 1.7 Pass or Audit 4 1.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 115 28.5 Studies Program 62 15.5 2 hours 116 28.8 Required by my major 222 55.4 3 hours 102 25.3 Other (e.g. elective) 117 29.2 4 - 5 hours 39 9.7 6 - 7 hours 18 4.5 8 or more hours 13 3.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 444 0.2 0.9 45.5 53.4 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 378 3.7 11.4 49.5 35.4 3.2 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 427 0.5 6.1 54.6 38.9 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 430 0.5 4.0 49.1 46.5 3.4 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 442 1.1 5.0 47.3 46.6 3.4 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 428 0.5 4.2 50.9 44.4 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 445 1.3 4.9 49.2 44.5 3.4 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 425 0.9 8.0 49.2 41.9 3.3 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 449 0.9 6.5 42.8 49.9 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 450 0.2 0.4 26.2 73.1 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 423 0.5 1.4 47.0 51.1 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 450 0.4 2.2 39.8 57.6 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 446 1.6 6.3 42.6 49.6 3.4 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 446 0.9 6.3 46.0 46.9 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 390 1.5 7.2 58.2 33.1 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 430 0.7 3.7 53.7 41.9 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 417 1.2 8.2 52.0 38.6 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 444 0.2 1.4 50.2 48.2 3.5 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 436 1.8 14.2 48.6 35.3 3.2 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 448 1.1 6.5 43.8 48.7 3.4 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 444 2.3 6.3 34.2 57.2 3.5 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 71 0.0 4.2 53.5 42.3 3.4 0.57 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 73 1.4 6.8 45.2 46.6 3.4 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 73 1.4 4.1 41.1 53.4 3.5 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 47 2.1 2.1 51.1 44.7 3.4 0.64 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 46 2.2 2.2 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.64 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 178 2.8 6.2 56.7 34.3 3.2 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 177 1.7 9.6 56.5 32.2 3.2 0.67 34. Instructor explained expectations 177 1.7 5.6 55.4 37.3 3.3 0.65 35. Instructor helped with my problems 168 0.6 5.4 57.7 36.3 3.3 0.59 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 147 1.4 6.1 57.1 35.4 3.3 0.63 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 602 Number of forms scanned = 483 Number of forms with at least one student response = 450 Percent completed = 74.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant Pathology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 29 61.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 27.7 Junior 1 2.1 C 5 10.6 Senior 16 34.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 29 61.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 8.5 Studies Program 1 2.2 2 hours 14 29.8 Required by my major 34 75.6 3 hours 12 25.5 Other (e.g. elective) 10 22.2 4 - 5 hours 9 19.1 6 - 7 hours 4 8.5 8 or more hours 4 8.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 47 0.0 8.5 27.7 63.8 3.6 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 2.8 8.3 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 48 0.0 4.2 31.3 64.6 3.6 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 46 2.2 4.3 37.0 56.5 3.5 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 0.0 2.2 42.2 55.6 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 47 2.1 19.1 29.8 48.9 3.3 0.85 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 46 0.0 4.3 37.0 58.7 3.5 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 48 4.2 2.1 39.6 54.2 3.4 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 48 0.0 2.1 22.9 75.0 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 48 2.1 0.0 25.0 72.9 3.7 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 48 2.1 6.3 22.9 68.8 3.6 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 6.3 2.1 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 48 0.0 4.2 35.4 60.4 3.6 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 48 0.0 6.3 39.6 54.2 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 48 0.0 4.2 47.9 47.9 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 0.0 2.1 41.7 56.3 3.5 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 48 2.1 8.3 39.6 50.0 3.4 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 48 0.0 14.6 25.0 60.4 3.5 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 48 2.1 10.4 27.1 60.4 3.5 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 23 0.0 13.0 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.70 33. Amount of work appropriate 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 34. Instructor explained expectations 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 35. Instructor helped with my problems 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 53 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 48 Percent completed = 90.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Veterinary Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 51.7 Sophomore 7 24.1 B 13 44.8 Junior 6 20.7 C 1 3.4 Senior 12 41.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.4 I 0 0.0 Other 2 6.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 24.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 44.8 Required by my major 4 13.8 3 hours 6 20.7 Other (e.g. elective) 25 86.2 4 - 5 hours 3 10.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 16.1 74.2 9.7 2.9 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 3.2 71.0 25.8 3.2 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 67.7 32.3 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 3.3 66.7 30.0 3.3 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 3.8 11.5 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 12.9 87.1 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 60.7 35.7 3.3 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 0.0 19.4 80.6 3.8 0.40 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 6.5 22.6 71.0 3.6 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 0.0 73.1 26.9 3.3 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 7.1 46.4 46.4 3.4 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 3.2 19.4 77.4 3.7 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 39 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 79.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 270 62.5 A 260 60.9 Sophomore 58 13.4 B 140 32.8 Junior 38 8.8 C 20 4.7 Senior 39 9.0 D 2 0.5 Graduate 23 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 0.9 Pass or Audit 5 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 97 22.6 Studies Program 132 31.0 2 hours 139 32.4 Required by my major 27 6.3 3 hours 129 30.1 Other (e.g. elective) 267 62.7 4 - 5 hours 49 11.4 6 - 7 hours 11 2.6 8 or more hours 4 0.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 464 1.1 2.6 40.9 55.4 3.5 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 400 2.8 11.5 40.5 45.3 3.3 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 455 0.0 5.9 47.9 46.2 3.4 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 236 0.0 3.4 50.8 45.8 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 446 1.3 5.6 45.5 47.5 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 451 1.6 4.7 44.8 49.0 3.4 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 430 1.4 4.7 44.9 49.1 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 429 1.6 6.5 44.3 47.6 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 466 0.9 6.2 38.0 54.9 3.5 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 466 0.2 0.2 15.9 83.7 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 436 0.2 0.9 43.3 55.5 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 466 0.9 1.9 32.6 64.6 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 463 2.2 8.9 32.0 57.0 3.4 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 465 0.4 0.6 26.2 72.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 450 0.2 3.3 40.7 55.8 3.5 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 453 0.7 6.6 49.4 43.3 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 393 1.3 15.5 45.5 37.7 3.2 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 460 0.2 3.0 43.5 53.3 3.5 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 459 5.2 17.0 37.3 40.5 3.1 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 463 2.2 9.3 33.5 55.1 3.4 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 459 1.1 6.1 26.1 66.7 3.6 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 123 1.6 8.9 60.2 29.3 3.2 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 165 0.6 9.1 61.8 28.5 3.2 0.61 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 169 0.0 7.7 49.7 42.6 3.3 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 87 1.1 6.9 44.8 47.1 3.4 0.67 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 63 1.6 7.9 50.8 39.7 3.3 0.68 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 183 1.1 7.1 55.7 36.1 3.3 0.64 28. Guided student report preparation 203 1.0 11.8 52.7 34.5 3.2 0.68 29. Students free to express opinions 236 1.7 2.5 24.6 71.2 3.7 0.62 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 236 0.4 2.1 34.3 63.1 3.6 0.56 31. Developed abil to conduct research 213 0.9 14.6 49.3 35.2 3.2 0.71 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 36 2.8 2.8 52.8 41.7 3.3 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 37 2.7 0.0 43.2 54.1 3.5 0.65 34. Instructor explained expectations 37 2.7 2.7 43.2 51.4 3.4 0.69 35. Instructor helped with my problems 34 2.9 2.9 52.9 41.2 3.3 0.68 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 596 Number of forms scanned = 477 Number of forms with at least one student response = 466 Percent completed = 78.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 141 13.3 A 472 44.7 Sophomore 427 40.3 B 455 43.1 Junior 242 22.8 C 116 11.0 Senior 187 17.6 D 11 1.0 Graduate 57 5.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 5 0.5 Pass or Audit 1 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 273 25.7 Studies Program 733 69.3 2 hours 344 32.4 Required by my major 207 19.6 3 hours 257 24.2 Other (e.g. elective) 118 11.2 4 - 5 hours 132 12.4 6 - 7 hours 29 2.7 8 or more hours 27 2.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,186 0.3 2.4 61.3 36.0 3.3 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,171 1.5 8.6 59.6 30.3 3.2 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,184 1.2 6.2 63.1 29.6 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,110 3.9 12.2 53.4 30.5 3.1 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,185 2.4 9.7 54.3 33.7 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,183 0.7 4.6 60.5 34.2 3.3 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,184 0.8 4.9 58.0 36.2 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,127 2.7 19.3 49.3 28.7 3.0 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,183 4.1 14.7 49.7 31.5 3.1 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,186 0.5 2.4 48.6 48.6 3.5 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 1,066 0.6 4.4 61.4 33.7 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,177 1.1 9.4 52.6 36.9 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,179 6.4 22.1 41.6 30.0 3.0 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 1,179 2.0 10.8 51.7 35.6 3.2 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,143 0.8 4.6 56.8 37.8 3.3 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,114 1.4 17.9 53.9 26.8 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,005 2.4 29.5 46.4 21.8 2.9 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,174 1.0 5.2 60.0 33.8 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,169 8.4 30.1 39.4 22.1 2.8 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,180 4.1 19.2 47.2 29.5 3.0 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,173 5.9 17.9 37.8 38.4 3.1 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 437 3.7 26.5 56.5 13.3 2.8 0.71 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 613 2.6 14.4 65.7 17.3 3.0 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 616 2.1 6.5 69.3 22.1 3.1 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 633 1.1 3.8 60.5 34.6 3.3 0.59 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 244 1.2 13.9 61.9 23.0 3.1 0.64 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 104 1.0 5.8 42.3 51.0 3.4 0.65 28. Guided student report preparation 112 0.9 11.6 42.9 44.6 3.3 0.71 29. Students free to express opinions 123 0.8 3.3 31.7 64.2 3.6 0.60 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 124 1.6 4.0 40.3 54.0 3.5 0.66 31. Developed abil to conduct research 110 1.8 8.2 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.69 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 258 1.9 8.9 51.9 37.2 3.2 0.69 33. Amount of work appropriate 259 0.8 4.6 64.1 30.5 3.2 0.57 34. Instructor explained expectations 258 0.8 8.5 57.0 33.7 3.2 0.63 35. Instructor helped with my problems 247 1.2 10.9 57.5 30.4 3.2 0.66 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 105 1.0 8.6 65.7 24.8 3.1 0.60 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1593 Number of forms scanned = 1197 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1192 Percent completed = 74.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 310 14.2 A 798 37.2 Sophomore 673 30.9 B 970 45.2 Junior 495 22.7 C 328 15.3 Senior 593 27.2 D 37 1.7 Graduate 88 4.0 E/Fail 2 0.1 Professional 3 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 17 0.8 Pass or Audit 10 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 407 18.9 Studies Program 414 19.1 2 hours 563 26.1 Required by my major 1,344 62.1 3 hours 582 27.0 Other (e.g. elective) 407 18.8 4 - 5 hours 427 19.8 6 - 7 hours 114 5.3 8 or more hours 65 3.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,385 1.5 3.8 56.6 38.1 3.3 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,197 4.3 12.1 55.2 28.4 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,055 3.8 13.5 56.9 25.8 3.0 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,201 6.7 16.2 52.3 24.8 3.0 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,349 3.2 8.4 58.0 30.4 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,043 3.4 7.8 58.0 30.8 3.2 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,267 3.2 6.3 54.4 36.1 3.2 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,828 8.7 26.3 44.4 20.6 2.8 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,371 5.2 15.3 46.9 32.5 3.1 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,394 1.3 3.9 43.1 51.7 3.5 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 2,110 0.8 4.4 59.8 35.1 3.3 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,360 2.3 8.4 52.2 37.1 3.2 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,349 8.8 22.8 41.4 27.0 2.9 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 2,321 3.3 14.8 49.4 32.5 3.1 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,890 3.4 16.7 58.0 22.0 3.0 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,262 3.5 15.2 57.3 24.0 3.0 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,119 4.0 21.5 53.8 20.8 2.9 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,346 3.1 8.9 60.1 27.8 3.1 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,308 10.6 29.9 40.3 19.2 2.7 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,376 8.1 20.3 45.7 25.9 2.9 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,378 6.7 17.0 37.8 38.5 3.1 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 645 3.9 11.9 60.9 23.3 3.0 0.71 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 633 4.1 15.8 58.8 21.3 3.0 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 492 5.7 19.3 55.7 19.3 2.9 0.78 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 232 8.6 19.4 53.0 19.0 2.8 0.84 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 230 5.2 12.2 57.8 24.8 3.0 0.76 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 151 2.0 9.3 45.7 43.0 3.3 0.72 28. Guided student report preparation 148 2.7 10.8 48.0 38.5 3.2 0.75 29. Students free to express opinions 163 0.6 3.7 49.1 46.6 3.4 0.60 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 159 1.9 3.1 49.1 45.9 3.4 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 149 4.0 13.4 52.3 30.2 3.1 0.77 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 581 9.0 18.8 48.4 23.9 2.9 0.88 33. Amount of work appropriate 616 23.7 17.0 42.2 17.0 2.5 1.03 34. Instructor explained expectations 615 6.0 10.6 53.2 30.2 3.1 0.80 35. Instructor helped with my problems 596 6.5 13.8 46.6 33.1 3.1 0.85 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 578 6.2 9.7 56.9 27.2 3.1 0.78 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 26 0.0 3.8 15.4 19.2 61.5 4.4 0.90 38. Question 38 23 17.4 4.3 26.1 30.4 21.7 3.3 1.37 39. Question 39 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 20.8 54.2 4.3 0.86 40. Question 40 23 21.7 17.4 13.0 17.4 30.4 3.2 1.59 41. Question 41 18 16.7 0.0 16.7 0.0 66.7 4.0 1.57 42. Question 42 18 27.8 11.1 0.0 33.3 27.8 3.2 1.66 Number of forms preslugged = at least 4340 Number of forms scanned = 2422 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2403 Percent completed = 55.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 396 23.8 A 612 37.3 Sophomore 541 32.5 B 687 41.9 Junior 309 18.6 C 290 17.7 Senior 291 17.5 D 42 2.6 Graduate 118 7.1 E/Fail 4 0.2 Professional 3 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 7 0.4 Pass or Audit 4 0.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 104 6.3 Studies Program 110 6.7 2 hours 287 17.3 Required by my major 1,409 85.5 3 hours 490 29.6 Other (e.g. elective) 128 7.8 4 - 5 hours 468 28.3 6 - 7 hours 176 10.6 8 or more hours 131 7.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,925 2.2 7.8 60.9 29.0 3.2 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,854 4.8 15.5 57.1 22.5 3.0 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,873 1.9 11.5 63.4 23.2 3.1 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,894 6.2 16.6 55.7 21.5 2.9 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,942 4.2 11.3 61.5 23.0 3.0 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,866 1.3 5.3 66.9 26.6 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,887 2.6 6.0 58.8 32.6 3.2 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,620 13.4 31.5 40.4 14.7 2.6 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,776 5.6 16.4 51.0 26.9 3.0 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,793 1.3 4.5 45.8 48.4 3.4 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 1,659 2.1 4.9 56.7 36.3 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,786 4.3 11.8 51.6 32.3 3.1 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,756 10.4 32.5 38.8 18.2 2.6 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 1,691 5.3 20.8 50.7 23.2 2.9 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,321 3.6 23.8 59.2 13.5 2.8 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,874 2.4 11.1 64.1 22.4 3.1 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,874 2.6 11.7 64.0 21.8 3.0 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,908 2.5 9.9 65.6 22.0 3.1 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,850 14.9 39.9 34.0 11.2 2.4 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,814 5.3 22.7 52.6 19.4 2.9 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,809 8.2 19.7 37.0 35.0 3.0 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 323 2.2 8.4 67.8 21.7 3.1 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 302 2.3 24.2 58.3 15.2 2.9 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 200 5.5 17.0 65.5 12.0 2.8 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 80 13.8 22.5 53.8 10.0 2.6 0.85 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 83 6.0 20.5 65.1 8.4 2.8 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 40 12.5 15.0 55.0 17.5 2.8 0.89 28. Guided student report preparation 37 8.1 13.5 64.9 13.5 2.8 0.76 29. Students free to express opinions 48 6.3 8.3 75.0 10.4 2.9 0.66 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 47 17.0 8.5 55.3 19.1 2.8 0.96 31. Developed abil to conduct research 45 15.6 13.3 51.1 20.0 2.8 0.96 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 678 9.3 14.0 59.7 17.0 2.8 0.81 33. Amount of work appropriate 684 9.9 16.8 58.9 14.3 2.8 0.81 34. Instructor explained expectations 681 8.2 16.3 55.2 20.3 2.9 0.82 35. Instructor helped with my problems 653 7.8 20.8 52.1 19.3 2.8 0.83 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 675 8.3 17.9 59.9 13.9 2.8 0.78 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 3631 Number of forms scanned = 3580 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1985 Percent completed = 54.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Classics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 75 29.4 A 130 51.6 Sophomore 60 23.5 B 92 36.5 Junior 44 17.3 C 23 9.1 Senior 56 22.0 D 4 1.6 Graduate 17 6.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 1.2 Pass or Audit 3 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 37 14.6 Studies Program 104 41.3 2 hours 51 20.1 Required by my major 63 25.0 3 hours 75 29.5 Other (e.g. elective) 85 33.7 4 - 5 hours 48 18.9 6 - 7 hours 26 10.2 8 or more hours 17 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 284 0.0 0.4 39.1 60.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 261 0.8 4.2 41.4 53.6 3.5 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 278 0.4 5.0 42.4 52.2 3.5 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 282 0.4 1.4 36.9 61.3 3.6 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 285 0.4 2.8 40.0 56.8 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 278 1.1 4.0 42.4 52.5 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 277 0.4 5.4 44.0 50.2 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 230 0.9 14.8 40.9 43.5 3.3 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 286 0.0 1.4 37.8 60.8 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 286 0.3 0.0 18.9 80.8 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 259 0.0 1.9 41.7 56.4 3.5 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 285 0.0 0.4 36.1 63.5 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 282 0.0 4.6 36.5 58.9 3.5 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 283 0.0 5.3 36.0 58.7 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 237 0.4 4.6 57.8 37.1 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 269 0.7 3.3 54.6 41.3 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 217 0.9 13.4 47.0 38.7 3.2 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 279 0.4 1.1 48.0 50.5 3.5 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 277 0.7 13.7 41.2 44.4 3.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 284 0.7 4.9 32.7 61.6 3.6 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 282 0.4 1.4 24.1 74.1 3.7 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 51 0.0 19.6 54.9 25.5 3.1 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 98 0.0 6.1 59.2 34.7 3.3 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 92 0.0 3.3 56.5 40.2 3.4 0.55 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 55 0.0 5.5 56.4 38.2 3.3 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 39 0.0 12.8 56.4 30.8 3.2 0.64 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 476 Number of forms scanned = 288 Number of forms with at least one student response = 286 Percent completed = 60.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = French SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 79 18.6 A 177 42.2 Sophomore 87 20.5 B 185 44.2 Junior 96 22.6 C 42 10.0 Senior 103 24.3 D 6 1.4 Graduate 46 10.8 E/Fail 1 0.2 Professional 3 0.7 I 0 0.0 Other 10 2.4 Pass or Audit 8 1.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 64 15.2 Studies Program 62 14.8 2 hours 114 27.0 Required by my major 253 60.4 3 hours 129 30.6 Other (e.g. elective) 104 24.8 4 - 5 hours 78 18.5 6 - 7 hours 27 6.4 8 or more hours 10 2.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 447 0.9 2.0 46.1 51.0 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 435 9.2 9.0 40.2 41.6 3.1 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 446 0.9 4.7 47.5 46.9 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 404 0.2 3.7 41.8 54.2 3.5 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 441 1.4 5.9 44.4 48.3 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 447 1.1 5.4 47.4 46.1 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 429 0.5 6.1 46.9 46.6 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 432 0.9 8.6 43.3 47.2 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 449 0.9 6.5 36.7 55.9 3.5 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 451 0.0 0.9 21.7 77.4 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 412 0.5 1.9 40.0 57.5 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 445 0.7 4.5 36.0 58.9 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 443 1.1 11.1 39.5 48.3 3.3 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 448 0.4 2.9 25.4 71.2 3.7 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 362 2.5 8.6 51.4 37.6 3.2 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 380 1.1 9.5 51.8 37.6 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 326 1.8 13.5 49.7 35.0 3.2 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 432 1.2 3.7 53.7 41.4 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 422 5.0 19.9 41.5 33.6 3.0 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 447 1.1 9.8 42.7 46.3 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 445 2.0 5.8 27.9 64.3 3.5 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 32 6.3 31.3 46.9 15.6 2.7 0.81 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 49 4.1 20.4 51.0 24.5 3.0 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 59 1.7 3.4 52.5 42.4 3.4 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 33 3.0 6.1 39.4 51.5 3.4 0.75 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 15 6.7 13.3 33.3 46.7 3.2 0.94 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 27 11.1 14.8 48.1 25.9 2.9 0.93 28. Guided student report preparation 25 12.0 16.0 40.0 32.0 2.9 1.00 29. Students free to express opinions 28 7.1 10.7 28.6 53.6 3.3 0.94 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 31. Developed abil to conduct research 25 0.0 16.0 48.0 36.0 3.2 0.71 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 610 Number of forms scanned = 558 Number of forms with at least one student response = 452 Percent completed = 74.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 178 19.2 A 374 40.7 Sophomore 272 29.3 B 408 44.3 Junior 198 21.3 C 123 13.4 Senior 200 21.6 D 10 1.1 Graduate 69 7.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 9 1.0 Pass or Audit 5 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 306 33.2 Studies Program 558 60.8 2 hours 270 29.3 Required by my major 194 21.1 3 hours 185 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 166 18.1 4 - 5 hours 98 10.6 6 - 7 hours 33 3.6 8 or more hours 31 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,033 0.6 3.3 55.1 41.0 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 971 4.5 16.4 52.6 26.5 3.0 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 970 1.9 12.4 59.4 26.4 3.1 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 974 2.2 10.5 50.7 36.7 3.2 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 994 1.9 8.5 53.7 35.9 3.2 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 982 0.8 6.3 57.6 35.2 3.3 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 993 2.1 7.9 56.2 33.8 3.2 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 926 3.3 19.9 54.2 22.6 3.0 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,033 2.1 12.0 49.8 36.1 3.2 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,034 0.4 1.9 36.6 61.1 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 950 0.4 2.2 52.9 44.4 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,027 0.9 3.1 53.1 42.9 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,016 5.7 17.4 45.4 31.5 3.0 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 1,021 2.0 9.3 57.1 31.6 3.2 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 938 1.7 9.9 60.8 27.6 3.1 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 975 1.7 15.3 59.1 23.9 3.1 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 884 3.4 25.5 53.4 17.8 2.9 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,020 1.9 6.9 62.5 28.7 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,005 7.7 31.6 40.0 20.7 2.7 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,023 4.5 16.6 50.1 28.7 3.0 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,016 3.2 13.0 39.7 44.1 3.2 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 412 5.6 25.0 58.5 10.9 2.7 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 561 3.6 13.7 68.3 14.4 2.9 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 515 2.1 14.8 67.2 15.9 3.0 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 477 2.3 5.7 62.3 29.8 3.2 0.64 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 216 1.4 13.0 68.1 17.6 3.0 0.60 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 72 0.0 9.7 51.4 38.9 3.3 0.64 28. Guided student report preparation 79 0.0 10.1 50.6 39.2 3.3 0.64 29. Students free to express opinions 104 1.0 4.8 41.3 52.9 3.5 0.64 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 102 1.0 5.9 43.1 50.0 3.4 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 95 1.1 13.7 52.6 32.6 3.2 0.69 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 33 0.0 12.1 57.6 30.3 3.2 0.64 33. Amount of work appropriate 37 0.0 8.1 64.9 27.0 3.2 0.57 34. Instructor explained expectations 36 2.8 16.7 55.6 25.0 3.0 0.74 35. Instructor helped with my problems 36 2.8 5.6 72.2 19.4 3.1 0.60 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 29 3.4 3.4 65.5 27.6 3.2 0.66 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 1544 Number of forms scanned = 1044 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1035 Percent completed = 67.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = German SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 30 15.2 A 91 47.4 Sophomore 33 16.7 B 73 38.0 Junior 49 24.7 C 17 8.9 Senior 53 26.8 D 4 2.1 Graduate 27 13.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 6 3.0 Pass or Audit 7 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 29 14.8 Studies Program 49 25.4 2 hours 61 31.1 Required by my major 93 48.2 3 hours 50 25.5 Other (e.g. elective) 51 26.4 4 - 5 hours 43 21.9 6 - 7 hours 8 4.1 8 or more hours 5 2.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 217 0.5 0.9 48.8 49.8 3.5 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 217 0.5 4.6 48.4 46.5 3.4 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 219 0.5 3.2 52.1 44.3 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 208 0.0 3.4 44.7 51.9 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 212 0.0 0.9 42.5 56.6 3.6 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 215 0.0 2.8 48.4 48.8 3.5 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 208 0.0 3.8 44.7 51.4 3.5 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 207 0.0 6.3 49.3 44.4 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 217 0.0 5.1 41.9 53.0 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 219 0.0 0.5 22.8 76.7 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 198 0.0 3.0 39.4 57.6 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 218 0.0 1.4 38.5 60.1 3.6 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 213 0.0 7.5 43.7 48.8 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 218 0.0 1.8 27.5 70.6 3.7 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 156 1.9 7.1 56.4 34.6 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 168 0.0 10.7 51.2 38.1 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 150 0.0 15.3 48.7 36.0 3.2 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 198 0.0 2.0 55.6 42.4 3.4 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 199 0.0 15.1 48.2 36.7 3.2 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 217 0.0 11.1 42.4 46.5 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 217 0.0 5.1 33.2 61.8 3.6 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 20.0 13.3 46.7 20.0 2.7 1.05 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 25 16.0 12.0 44.0 28.0 2.8 1.03 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 29 3.4 3.4 58.6 34.5 3.2 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 5.6 5.6 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.83 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 9.1 9.1 36.4 45.5 3.2 0.98 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 24 4.2 12.5 37.5 45.8 3.3 0.85 28. Guided student report preparation 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 29. Students free to express opinions 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 31. Developed abil to conduct research 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 4 25.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 . 38. Question 38 4 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 39. Question 39 4 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 40. Question 40 4 25.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 . 41. Question 41 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 42. Question 42 4 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 43. Question 43 4 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 44. Question 44 3 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 . 45. Question 45 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 46. Question 46 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 . 47. Question 47 4 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 . 48. Question 48 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 . 49. Question 49 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 297 Number of forms scanned = 219 Number of forms with at least one student response = 219 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 119 17.9 A 304 45.8 Sophomore 138 20.8 B 302 45.5 Junior 203 30.6 C 54 8.1 Senior 167 25.2 D 2 0.3 Graduate 28 4.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 9 1.4 Pass or Audit 2 0.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 262 39.5 Studies Program 309 46.5 2 hours 207 31.2 Required by my major 286 43.1 3 hours 133 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 69 10.4 4 - 5 hours 40 6.0 6 - 7 hours 14 2.1 8 or more hours 8 1.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 739 2.0 3.4 55.9 38.7 3.3 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 722 3.3 15.8 54.3 26.6 3.0 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 719 2.5 9.3 55.1 33.1 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 679 2.5 8.7 56.0 32.8 3.2 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 735 2.7 5.9 53.7 37.7 3.3 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 712 1.7 3.7 56.9 37.8 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 729 5.3 1.4 51.0 42.2 3.3 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 690 4.8 17.8 46.4 31.0 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 748 3.5 8.8 48.8 38.9 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 749 0.4 1.3 44.1 54.2 3.5 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 664 1.2 2.4 54.8 41.6 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 739 1.6 5.0 51.8 41.5 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 735 5.3 17.8 44.9 32.0 3.0 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 731 3.4 11.2 50.1 35.3 3.2 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 601 2.7 13.8 57.4 26.1 3.1 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 705 2.3 10.6 61.1 26.0 3.1 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 672 2.2 17.0 56.8 24.0 3.0 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 737 2.0 6.2 58.2 33.5 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 717 8.9 29.7 41.3 20.1 2.7 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 742 5.4 16.8 52.4 25.3 3.0 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 740 4.9 9.7 43.2 42.2 3.2 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 311 1.9 10.3 62.1 25.7 3.1 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 304 3.0 15.8 57.6 23.7 3.0 0.72 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 286 4.2 14.7 53.5 27.6 3.0 0.77 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 130 6.2 16.9 50.0 26.9 3.0 0.83 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 141 3.5 12.8 51.8 31.9 3.1 0.76 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 47 2.1 12.8 53.2 31.9 3.1 0.72 28. Guided student report preparation 49 0.0 12.2 67.3 20.4 3.1 0.57 29. Students free to express opinions 52 0.0 3.8 67.3 28.8 3.3 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 56 0.0 7.1 66.1 26.8 3.2 0.55 31. Developed abil to conduct research 48 0.0 12.5 60.4 27.1 3.1 0.62 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 226 1.8 7.1 54.0 37.2 3.3 0.67 33. Amount of work appropriate 227 4.0 10.1 56.4 29.5 3.1 0.74 34. Instructor explained expectations 227 0.9 7.0 53.3 38.8 3.3 0.64 35. Instructor helped with my problems 221 0.5 6.8 55.7 37.1 3.3 0.61 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 181 0.6 5.5 59.1 34.8 3.3 0.59 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1256 Number of forms scanned = 754 Number of forms with at least one student response = 753 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 395 26.3 A 653 43.9 Sophomore 364 24.2 B 657 44.2 Junior 275 18.3 C 150 10.1 Senior 356 23.7 D 17 1.1 Graduate 97 6.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 16 1.1 Pass or Audit 11 0.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 319 21.3 Studies Program 747 50.4 2 hours 459 30.6 Required by my major 473 31.9 3 hours 409 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 262 17.7 4 - 5 hours 213 14.2 6 - 7 hours 49 3.3 8 or more hours 51 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,697 0.5 2.9 49.8 46.8 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,604 2.4 10.5 50.8 36.3 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,670 1.9 7.2 55.2 35.6 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,591 1.1 3.3 48.5 47.1 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,685 1.7 7.1 49.4 41.8 3.3 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,677 1.5 6.9 51.8 39.8 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,672 1.7 13.3 52.8 32.2 3.2 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,643 1.1 7.2 52.6 39.1 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,687 2.7 8.2 43.5 45.5 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,693 0.2 0.4 31.4 68.1 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 1,538 0.3 3.3 52.1 44.3 3.4 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,664 1.0 4.2 46.4 48.4 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,682 4.1 13.1 40.9 41.9 3.2 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 1,668 3.4 15.8 41.2 39.6 3.2 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,528 1.4 9.6 59.1 29.9 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,606 1.8 10.7 55.4 32.1 3.2 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,394 2.9 22.8 46.8 27.5 3.0 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,662 1.3 4.9 56.6 37.2 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,658 5.4 23.8 41.1 29.7 3.0 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,679 2.6 9.9 42.9 44.6 3.3 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,668 3.2 10.3 33.0 53.6 3.4 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 444 2.3 23.2 55.9 18.7 2.9 0.71 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 677 1.9 21.7 57.9 18.5 2.9 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 711 1.8 7.9 65.0 25.3 3.1 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 364 2.2 9.1 63.2 25.5 3.1 0.65 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 341 1.8 7.0 61.6 29.6 3.2 0.63 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 178 1.1 7.3 46.6 44.9 3.4 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 190 1.6 5.3 51.6 41.6 3.3 0.65 29. Students free to express opinions 225 2.2 4.0 41.8 52.0 3.4 0.68 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 224 1.8 6.7 43.3 48.2 3.4 0.69 31. Developed abil to conduct research 197 1.5 12.7 46.2 39.6 3.2 0.73 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 430 1.6 6.5 45.8 46.0 3.4 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 429 1.6 6.5 51.5 40.3 3.3 0.66 34. Instructor explained expectations 427 1.2 5.2 50.6 43.1 3.4 0.64 35. Instructor helped with my problems 418 1.4 8.9 46.9 42.8 3.3 0.69 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 180 0.6 6.7 52.2 40.6 3.3 0.62 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1,024 1.3 2.2 11.8 37.1 47.6 4.3 0.85 38. Question 38 1,024 0.5 2.1 12.6 37.8 47.0 4.3 0.80 39. Question 39 1,021 1.6 3.8 15.1 34.8 44.8 4.2 0.93 40. Question 40 1,021 1.5 5.7 16.2 36.4 40.3 4.1 0.96 41. Question 41 1,005 0.5 1.4 15.0 36.9 46.2 4.3 0.80 42. Question 42 1,008 3.8 9.4 24.8 37.0 25.0 3.7 1.06 43. Question 43 1,019 1.2 4.2 16.5 39.9 38.2 4.1 0.90 44. Question 44 1,020 3.2 5.7 16.7 36.8 37.6 4.0 1.03 45. Question 45 1,022 8.4 19.1 57.0 11.8 3.6 2.8 0.87 46. Question 46 974 58.9 23.7 7.2 6.5 3.7 1.7 1.08 47. Question 47 34 8.8 5.9 8.8 20.6 55.9 4.1 1.31 48. Question 48 31 9.7 9.7 6.5 19.4 54.8 4.0 1.39 49. Question 49 37 21.6 10.8 5.4 16.2 45.9 3.5 1.66 Number of forms preslugged = at least 2441 Number of forms scanned = 1761 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1743 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = English SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 75.0 Junior 1 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 25.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 50.0 3 hours 2 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 50.0 4 - 5 hours 1 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1,704 54.1 A 1,039 33.6 Sophomore 591 18.8 B 1,108 35.8 Junior 361 11.5 C 634 20.5 Senior 238 7.6 D 163 5.3 Graduate 152 4.8 E/Fail 23 0.7 Professional 1 0.0 I 4 0.1 Other 103 3.3 Pass or Audit 122 3.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 383 12.3 Studies Program 853 28.2 2 hours 677 21.8 Required by my major 1,804 59.6 3 hours 877 28.2 Other (e.g. elective) 372 12.3 4 - 5 hours 708 22.8 6 - 7 hours 259 8.3 8 or more hours 206 6.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 3,290 1.0 4.8 55.7 38.6 3.3 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3,259 9.5 16.9 49.3 24.3 2.9 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3,284 2.8 9.5 55.9 31.8 3.2 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3,259 3.6 10.0 51.8 34.6 3.2 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3,307 2.1 8.3 53.6 36.1 3.2 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3,264 1.0 4.0 58.0 37.0 3.3 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3,276 0.8 5.9 51.7 41.6 3.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 3,162 5.9 27.6 44.3 22.2 2.8 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3,318 5.1 14.5 46.5 33.9 3.1 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3,320 0.7 3.2 41.2 54.9 3.5 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 3,076 0.8 3.8 51.8 43.6 3.4 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 3,307 2.4 10.5 45.5 41.6 3.3 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3,223 9.3 29.2 37.4 24.1 2.8 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 3,263 3.6 16.2 49.4 30.9 3.1 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,402 4.0 19.4 57.4 19.2 2.9 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 3,227 3.2 12.6 57.9 26.2 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3,262 2.7 10.1 57.8 29.3 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 3,274 3.5 10.0 58.5 28.0 3.1 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 3,110 17.0 41.2 29.1 12.7 2.4 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 3,322 6.1 18.9 47.2 27.8 3.0 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 3,305 7.0 16.0 34.7 42.4 3.1 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 518 4.6 17.2 61.8 16.4 2.9 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 619 7.1 22.1 55.9 14.9 2.8 0.78 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 401 6.0 17.5 57.9 18.7 2.9 0.77 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 199 9.5 26.1 45.7 18.6 2.7 0.87 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 189 9.0 17.5 52.9 20.6 2.9 0.85 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 129 5.4 9.3 47.3 38.0 3.2 0.81 28. Guided student report preparation 114 1.8 9.6 47.4 41.2 3.3 0.71 29. Students free to express opinions 142 0.7 4.9 54.2 40.1 3.3 0.61 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 133 3.8 10.5 46.6 39.1 3.2 0.78 31. Developed abil to conduct research 110 3.6 12.7 51.8 31.8 3.1 0.76 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 357 2.0 4.8 51.8 41.5 3.3 0.66 33. Amount of work appropriate 363 0.8 5.0 57.9 36.4 3.3 0.60 34. Instructor explained expectations 363 1.1 9.1 50.7 39.1 3.3 0.67 35. Instructor helped with my problems 360 1.7 8.1 51.7 38.6 3.3 0.68 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 180 2.8 6.1 55.0 36.1 3.2 0.69 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 593 6.7 16.2 8.9 42.3 25.8 3.6 1.22 38. Question 38 611 1.6 3.3 6.2 29.8 59.1 4.4 0.87 39. Question 39 591 6.3 15.6 12.5 38.4 27.2 3.6 1.21 40. Question 40 607 7.6 6.1 11.4 36.4 38.6 3.9 1.19 41. Question 41 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 5760 Number of forms scanned = 3413 Number of forms with at least one student response = 3389 Percent completed = 58.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Microbiology and Immunology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 28.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 44.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 9 23.7 Senior 28 71.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 20.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 7.7 Pass or Audit 1 2.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 2.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 7.9 Required by my major 3 7.7 3 hours 13 34.2 Other (e.g. elective) 36 92.3 4 - 5 hours 9 23.7 6 - 7 hours 6 15.8 8 or more hours 6 15.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 0.0 2.4 61.9 35.7 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 11.5 65.4 23.1 3.1 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 4.9 17.1 61.0 17.1 2.9 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 7.3 26.8 48.8 17.1 2.8 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 2.4 4.9 73.2 19.5 3.1 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 5.4 35.1 51.4 8.1 2.6 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 11.9 23.8 42.9 21.4 2.7 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 42 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 2.6 57.9 39.5 3.4 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 42 0.0 7.1 61.9 31.0 3.2 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 2.5 25.0 40.0 32.5 3.0 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 41 0.0 17.1 65.9 17.1 3.0 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 3.3 20.0 60.0 16.7 2.9 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 2.6 17.9 51.3 28.2 3.1 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 2.7 27.0 48.6 21.6 2.9 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 7.3 56.1 36.6 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 4.9 29.3 36.6 29.3 2.9 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 4.8 26.2 42.9 26.2 2.9 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 9.5 35.7 28.6 26.2 2.7 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 49 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 158 14.1 A 429 39.1 Sophomore 368 32.9 B 464 42.3 Junior 267 23.9 C 164 15.0 Senior 273 24.4 D 23 2.1 Graduate 43 3.8 E/Fail 3 0.3 Professional 3 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 7 0.6 Pass or Audit 13 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 323 29.0 Studies Program 652 59.1 2 hours 331 29.8 Required by my major 202 18.3 3 hours 282 25.4 Other (e.g. elective) 249 22.6 4 - 5 hours 116 10.4 6 - 7 hours 37 3.3 8 or more hours 23 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,277 1.1 4.4 55.8 38.7 3.3 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,266 2.7 11.1 50.7 35.5 3.2 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,237 2.7 11.6 51.7 34.0 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,219 2.2 6.6 50.5 40.7 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,258 2.5 9.8 48.9 38.9 3.2 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,234 2.4 6.2 53.6 37.8 3.3 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,261 1.7 8.7 51.9 37.6 3.3 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,229 3.3 14.5 49.2 33.0 3.1 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,278 5.2 13.1 44.8 36.9 3.1 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,279 0.9 3.5 40.7 54.9 3.5 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 1,153 1.0 2.1 52.3 44.7 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,270 2.0 9.6 47.2 41.1 3.3 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,258 8.6 21.1 37.6 32.7 2.9 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 1,271 2.0 6.9 47.7 43.4 3.3 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,162 2.4 10.4 54.1 33.0 3.2 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,240 3.2 11.9 49.8 35.2 3.2 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,179 3.7 18.2 47.8 30.4 3.0 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,259 2.9 8.1 53.5 35.4 3.2 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,249 13.1 30.4 33.6 22.9 2.7 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,265 6.7 17.8 46.2 29.3 3.0 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,258 5.9 14.5 37.7 42.0 3.2 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 398 5.0 19.3 58.3 17.3 2.9 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 498 6.4 23.1 53.0 17.5 2.8 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 442 2.9 14.9 61.1 21.0 3.0 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 200 5.5 17.0 51.5 26.0 3.0 0.81 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 210 7.1 15.2 56.2 21.4 2.9 0.81 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 52 3.8 7.7 51.9 36.5 3.2 0.75 28. Guided student report preparation 53 5.7 13.2 52.8 28.3 3.0 0.81 29. Students free to express opinions 61 0.0 4.9 41.0 54.1 3.5 0.60 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 63 1.6 11.1 36.5 50.8 3.4 0.75 31. Developed abil to conduct research 57 3.5 14.0 47.4 35.1 3.1 0.79 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 40 2.5 5.0 62.5 30.0 3.2 0.65 33. Amount of work appropriate 40 2.5 7.5 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.68 34. Instructor explained expectations 40 2.5 2.5 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 35. Instructor helped with my problems 39 5.1 7.7 59.0 28.2 3.1 0.75 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 34 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.80 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 45. Question 45 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 2009 Number of forms scanned = 1284 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1281 Percent completed = 63.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 143 18.9 A 335 44.3 Sophomore 146 19.3 B 319 42.2 Junior 203 26.9 C 86 11.4 Senior 209 27.7 D 7 0.9 Graduate 49 6.5 E/Fail 2 0.3 Professional 1 0.1 I 1 0.1 Other 4 0.5 Pass or Audit 6 0.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 144 19.1 Studies Program 171 22.7 2 hours 218 28.9 Required by my major 395 52.5 3 hours 226 29.9 Other (e.g. elective) 186 24.7 4 - 5 hours 106 14.0 6 - 7 hours 42 5.6 8 or more hours 19 2.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 823 0.6 1.7 50.5 47.1 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 786 2.3 8.7 50.8 38.3 3.3 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 809 2.0 8.3 51.5 38.2 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 791 2.1 6.7 46.8 44.4 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 812 1.5 6.3 48.3 44.0 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 808 1.1 4.6 51.5 42.8 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 811 0.7 5.4 52.7 41.2 3.3 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 779 2.7 13.0 51.3 33.0 3.1 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 821 2.7 10.4 45.6 41.4 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 821 0.6 2.1 33.4 63.9 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 756 0.5 1.1 48.1 50.3 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 819 1.8 4.9 45.4 47.9 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 820 4.4 11.3 40.7 43.5 3.2 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 815 2.1 9.7 42.7 45.5 3.3 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 770 1.3 7.0 56.2 35.5 3.3 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 789 1.3 9.3 52.5 37.0 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 722 1.9 15.7 51.4 31.0 3.1 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 816 1.1 4.8 50.4 43.8 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 810 5.8 17.5 41.9 34.8 3.1 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 814 2.1 12.9 43.2 41.8 3.2 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 811 3.1 11.2 34.2 51.5 3.3 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 124 2.4 16.1 56.5 25.0 3.0 0.71 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 166 1.2 14.5 63.9 20.5 3.0 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 165 2.4 7.3 66.7 23.6 3.1 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 97 2.1 9.3 55.7 33.0 3.2 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 89 2.2 11.2 55.1 31.5 3.2 0.71 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 51 2.0 15.7 35.3 47.1 3.3 0.80 28. Guided student report preparation 57 1.8 7.0 40.4 50.9 3.4 0.70 29. Students free to express opinions 68 2.9 2.9 30.9 63.2 3.5 0.70 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 69 2.9 7.2 31.9 58.0 3.4 0.76 31. Developed abil to conduct research 61 3.3 9.8 37.7 49.2 3.3 0.79 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 97 5.2 8.2 46.4 40.2 3.2 0.81 33. Amount of work appropriate 98 3.1 6.1 50.0 40.8 3.3 0.72 34. Instructor explained expectations 95 2.1 9.5 48.4 40.0 3.3 0.72 35. Instructor helped with my problems 90 4.4 8.9 50.0 36.7 3.2 0.78 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 50 4.0 6.0 52.0 38.0 3.2 0.74 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 1305 Number of forms scanned = 1180 Number of forms with at least one student response = 828 Percent completed = 63.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1,374 42.1 A 1,465 45.3 Sophomore 533 16.3 B 1,266 39.1 Junior 538 16.5 C 353 10.9 Senior 651 19.9 D 24 0.7 Graduate 153 4.7 E/Fail 3 0.1 Professional 3 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 14 0.4 Pass or Audit 125 3.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1,248 38.5 Studies Program 1,144 35.3 2 hours 910 28.1 Required by my major 1,464 45.1 3 hours 645 19.9 Other (e.g. elective) 636 19.6 4 - 5 hours 349 10.8 6 - 7 hours 61 1.9 8 or more hours 31 1.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 3,541 0.3 1.9 46.8 51.0 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3,349 4.3 12.6 51.0 32.1 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3,157 1.6 8.4 55.4 34.7 3.2 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3,301 1.7 4.9 47.0 46.4 3.4 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3,475 0.7 3.4 46.3 49.6 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3,216 0.7 2.9 52.0 44.4 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3,427 1.1 4.0 45.6 49.3 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,919 2.8 16.9 47.7 32.6 3.1 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3,544 1.2 4.8 41.5 52.5 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3,548 0.3 1.3 34.7 63.6 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 3,261 0.4 2.1 48.3 49.2 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 3,543 0.6 2.8 43.3 53.3 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3,519 2.3 10.9 42.2 44.6 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 3,500 0.9 5.9 46.6 46.6 3.4 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3,219 0.7 6.7 61.1 31.4 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 3,407 0.9 7.3 56.0 35.9 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3,200 1.2 14.5 54.5 29.8 3.1 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 3,496 0.6 2.7 53.1 43.6 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 3,447 3.4 22.3 45.5 28.8 3.0 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 3,517 1.5 8.3 44.0 46.2 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 3,508 1.9 6.9 30.6 60.5 3.5 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1,013 0.2 5.6 62.2 32.0 3.3 0.56 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1,067 0.6 7.5 61.6 30.4 3.2 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 849 1.5 10.4 60.7 27.4 3.1 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 448 1.1 15.6 56.5 26.8 3.1 0.68 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 418 1.9 11.7 56.9 29.4 3.1 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 212 0.5 5.2 51.4 42.9 3.4 0.61 28. Guided student report preparation 207 1.0 5.3 51.2 42.5 3.4 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 252 0.0 2.4 48.4 49.2 3.5 0.55 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 250 0.8 2.8 54.0 42.4 3.4 0.58 31. Developed abil to conduct research 223 1.8 10.8 50.7 36.8 3.2 0.71 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1,191 2.6 8.6 46.7 42.1 3.3 0.73 33. Amount of work appropriate 1,196 0.8 1.7 52.1 45.4 3.4 0.57 34. Instructor explained expectations 1,197 2.1 4.3 46.3 47.3 3.4 0.67 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1,108 2.4 8.1 50.6 38.8 3.3 0.71 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 761 0.9 3.9 55.3 39.8 3.3 0.60 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 4969 Number of forms scanned = 4414 Number of forms with at least one student response = 3571 Percent completed = 71.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Russian and Eastern Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 17 8.4 A 92 46.0 Sophomore 58 28.6 B 64 32.0 Junior 42 20.7 C 24 12.0 Senior 66 32.5 D 6 3.0 Graduate 12 5.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 8 3.9 Pass or Audit 14 7.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 32 15.8 Studies Program 59 29.2 2 hours 53 26.1 Required by my major 36 17.8 3 hours 52 25.6 Other (e.g. elective) 107 53.0 4 - 5 hours 42 20.7 6 - 7 hours 13 6.4 8 or more hours 11 5.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 223 0.4 2.7 45.7 51.1 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 219 1.4 7.8 41.1 49.8 3.4 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 225 0.0 5.8 41.3 52.9 3.5 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 204 0.5 3.4 43.1 52.9 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 222 1.4 5.4 40.5 52.7 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 224 0.0 3.1 46.4 50.4 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 224 0.0 0.9 38.8 60.3 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 220 0.9 5.0 42.7 51.4 3.4 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 224 0.9 3.6 43.3 52.2 3.5 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 225 0.0 0.4 19.6 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 212 0.0 2.4 41.5 56.1 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 223 0.9 2.7 40.8 55.6 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 224 0.9 6.7 34.8 57.6 3.5 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 224 0.9 2.2 29.9 67.0 3.6 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 190 0.0 3.2 47.4 49.5 3.5 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 186 0.5 6.5 51.6 41.4 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 161 1.2 9.3 50.3 39.1 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 215 0.5 1.4 51.6 46.5 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 215 1.9 7.0 39.5 51.6 3.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 225 1.3 6.2 32.4 60.0 3.5 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 223 1.3 6.7 28.3 63.7 3.5 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 22 13.6 13.6 36.4 36.4 3.0 1.05 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 43 4.7 9.3 48.8 37.2 3.2 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 48 2.1 10.4 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 53 1.9 0.0 32.1 66.0 3.6 0.60 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 13 7.7 0.0 53.8 38.5 3.2 0.83 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 320 Number of forms scanned = 226 Number of forms with at least one student response = 226 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 565 33.8 A 743 44.8 Sophomore 262 15.7 B 695 41.9 Junior 307 18.4 C 171 10.3 Senior 469 28.0 D 9 0.5 Graduate 63 3.8 E/Fail 2 0.1 Professional 1 0.1 I 1 0.1 Other 6 0.4 Pass or Audit 38 2.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 509 30.5 Studies Program 709 42.9 2 hours 504 30.2 Required by my major 414 25.0 3 hours 385 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 531 32.1 4 - 5 hours 187 11.2 6 - 7 hours 50 3.0 8 or more hours 32 1.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,810 0.9 1.8 48.0 49.3 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,762 1.9 8.5 54.5 35.1 3.2 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,726 1.6 9.0 55.7 33.6 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,732 2.1 6.9 46.8 44.1 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,786 2.0 5.5 45.5 47.0 3.4 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,723 1.8 4.4 49.7 44.1 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,781 1.7 7.2 46.8 44.2 3.3 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,531 3.7 17.6 46.1 32.6 3.1 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,811 2.6 9.4 44.0 44.0 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,809 0.7 1.5 34.6 63.2 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 1,643 0.9 2.6 49.8 46.7 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,798 1.3 3.4 43.2 52.1 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,798 3.8 13.0 40.9 42.3 3.2 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 1,787 2.2 8.9 44.7 44.3 3.3 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,728 1.0 5.6 56.1 37.4 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,765 1.4 9.1 55.5 33.9 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,620 2.3 18.1 51.9 27.7 3.0 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,794 1.3 4.3 54.6 39.7 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,777 5.1 25.1 42.6 27.2 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,798 2.7 11.8 45.9 39.5 3.2 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,792 2.6 11.2 33.3 52.8 3.4 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 542 1.1 14.6 61.8 22.5 3.1 0.64 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 626 1.3 12.0 62.0 24.8 3.1 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 547 3.7 11.2 61.1 24.1 3.1 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 400 2.5 8.8 60.5 28.3 3.1 0.67 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 329 3.6 10.0 64.1 22.2 3.0 0.68 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 139 1.4 5.8 58.3 34.5 3.3 0.63 28. Guided student report preparation 137 2.9 3.6 56.2 37.2 3.3 0.67 29. Students free to express opinions 158 1.9 2.5 50.0 45.6 3.4 0.64 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 159 2.5 2.5 54.1 40.9 3.3 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 138 3.6 8.7 55.1 32.6 3.2 0.73 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 76 0.0 3.9 59.2 36.8 3.3 0.55 33. Amount of work appropriate 81 0.0 7.4 58.0 34.6 3.3 0.59 34. Instructor explained expectations 76 1.3 5.3 57.9 35.5 3.3 0.62 35. Instructor helped with my problems 73 1.4 5.5 58.9 34.2 3.3 0.62 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 70 4.3 4.3 57.1 34.3 3.2 0.72 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 2867 Number of forms scanned = 1823 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1815 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Spanish and Italian SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 265 18.8 A 734 53.0 Sophomore 306 21.7 B 481 34.7 Junior 408 29.0 C 131 9.5 Senior 327 23.2 D 16 1.2 Graduate 86 6.1 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 3 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 12 0.9 Pass or Audit 22 1.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 314 22.5 Studies Program 272 19.7 2 hours 346 24.8 Required by my major 861 62.3 3 hours 348 24.9 Other (e.g. elective) 250 18.1 4 - 5 hours 268 19.2 6 - 7 hours 76 5.4 8 or more hours 44 3.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,670 0.5 3.5 46.9 49.0 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,652 3.1 10.3 48.0 38.6 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,671 2.5 9.6 50.6 37.3 3.2 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,647 1.6 7.5 48.1 42.7 3.3 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,646 1.5 7.5 46.7 44.3 3.3 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,665 0.7 5.0 50.9 43.4 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,657 1.3 4.3 46.7 47.7 3.4 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,642 2.9 9.6 46.2 41.4 3.3 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,678 2.2 7.2 43.1 47.6 3.4 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,677 0.4 0.7 30.5 68.5 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 1,577 0.5 2.2 42.5 54.7 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,674 0.9 4.3 41.1 53.7 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,656 3.7 12.8 42.1 41.4 3.2 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 1,669 0.8 2.2 32.1 64.9 3.6 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,437 1.6 7.7 56.2 34.5 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,451 2.2 12.9 51.6 33.3 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,316 2.7 21.0 47.1 29.1 3.0 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,591 1.6 5.0 57.1 36.2 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,567 6.3 20.9 42.2 30.5 3.0 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,659 4.6 13.9 44.2 37.2 3.1 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,653 2.1 8.4 30.6 59.0 3.5 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 185 7.6 21.6 49.7 21.1 2.8 0.84 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 241 6.2 15.4 57.7 20.7 2.9 0.78 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 261 1.9 7.3 60.2 30.7 3.2 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 170 4.1 4.1 57.6 34.1 3.2 0.71 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 129 4.7 7.8 59.7 27.9 3.1 0.73 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 91 0.0 7.7 54.9 37.4 3.3 0.61 28. Guided student report preparation 89 2.2 7.9 52.8 37.1 3.2 0.70 29. Students free to express opinions 95 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.58 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 92 1.1 8.7 51.1 39.1 3.3 0.67 31. Developed abil to conduct research 77 0.0 10.4 59.7 29.9 3.2 0.61 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 299 7.7 22.4 51.5 18.4 2.8 0.82 33. Amount of work appropriate 300 0.7 9.7 66.7 23.0 3.1 0.58 34. Instructor explained expectations 301 4.7 15.3 55.1 24.9 3.0 0.77 35. Instructor helped with my problems 295 5.8 19.3 53.6 21.4 2.9 0.79 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 187 5.3 13.4 59.9 21.4 3.0 0.75 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 2317 Number of forms scanned = 1708 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1684 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 331 69.0 Sophomore 3 0.6 B 135 28.1 Junior 81 16.7 C 10 2.1 Senior 206 42.5 D 1 0.2 Graduate 191 39.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 3 0.6 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.2 Pass or Audit 3 0.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 168 35.0 Studies Program 21 4.4 2 hours 138 28.8 Required by my major 409 84.9 3 hours 97 20.2 Other (e.g. elective) 52 10.8 4 - 5 hours 50 10.4 6 - 7 hours 17 3.5 8 or more hours 10 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 529 2.3 7.4 55.8 34.6 3.2 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 511 8.2 20.0 53.6 18.2 2.8 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 508 3.0 8.9 61.2 27.0 3.1 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 528 1.1 8.5 55.5 34.8 3.2 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 519 1.7 4.2 59.7 34.3 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 502 2.2 8.8 58.8 30.3 3.2 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 522 2.3 8.6 52.1 37.0 3.2 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 494 3.8 22.9 51.0 22.3 2.9 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 526 5.7 14.8 51.7 27.8 3.0 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 525 1.0 5.3 47.4 46.3 3.4 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 466 1.7 4.9 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 524 3.2 11.5 54.0 31.3 3.1 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 518 8.3 28.2 40.5 23.0 2.8 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 520 2.5 11.9 55.8 29.8 3.1 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 434 4.1 17.1 59.9 18.9 2.9 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 514 3.3 13.0 56.4 27.2 3.1 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 512 3.1 13.5 57.6 25.8 3.1 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 523 2.9 8.8 61.2 27.2 3.1 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 515 8.0 36.7 38.6 16.7 2.6 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 527 6.8 21.1 45.9 26.2 2.9 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 524 9.7 17.4 42.0 30.9 2.9 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 10.5 15.8 47.4 26.3 2.9 0.94 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 15.4 15.4 38.5 30.8 2.8 1.07 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 11.1 0.0 44.4 44.4 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 33 3.0 0.0 15.2 81.8 0.0 3.8 0.61 38. Question 38 33 3.0 0.0 24.2 72.7 0.0 3.7 0.65 39. Question 39 32 3.1 6.3 21.9 68.8 0.0 3.6 0.76 40. Question 40 33 3.0 0.0 27.3 69.7 0.0 3.6 0.65 41. Question 41 33 3.0 0.0 21.2 75.8 0.0 3.7 0.64 42. Question 42 30 3.3 10.0 33.3 53.3 0.0 3.4 0.81 43. Question 43 33 9.1 0.0 48.5 42.4 0.0 3.2 0.87 44. Question 44 32 3.1 12.5 40.6 43.8 0.0 3.3 0.80 Number of forms preslugged = at least 819 Number of forms scanned = 533 Number of forms with at least one student response = 530 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 111 6.2 A 775 43.9 Sophomore 491 27.4 B 759 43.0 Junior 462 25.8 C 204 11.5 Senior 495 27.6 D 11 0.6 Graduate 206 11.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 5 0.3 I 2 0.1 Other 24 1.3 Pass or Audit 16 0.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 404 22.7 Studies Program 168 9.5 2 hours 610 34.3 Required by my major 1,355 76.3 3 hours 452 25.4 Other (e.g. elective) 253 14.2 4 - 5 hours 226 12.7 6 - 7 hours 48 2.7 8 or more hours 37 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,935 0.3 2.2 52.2 45.3 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,841 5.2 14.2 50.8 29.8 3.1 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,893 1.2 4.6 47.5 46.7 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,893 0.8 4.3 49.0 45.9 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,926 0.6 3.7 49.4 46.4 3.4 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,887 0.7 2.8 50.3 46.2 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,921 0.6 3.6 49.6 46.2 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,830 1.9 19.0 49.2 29.9 3.1 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,935 1.9 8.1 42.6 47.5 3.4 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,937 0.4 1.3 33.8 64.5 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 1,813 0.8 2.3 45.8 51.1 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,922 1.0 5.9 46.5 46.6 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,909 3.4 16.3 44.4 35.8 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 1,924 1.2 6.7 43.9 48.2 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,645 1.5 12.0 60.2 26.3 3.1 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,900 0.8 5.2 59.9 34.1 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,873 1.0 6.9 60.0 32.1 3.2 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,922 0.8 3.4 57.6 38.1 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,872 6.1 29.9 43.1 20.9 2.8 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,925 2.3 9.1 49.5 39.2 3.3 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,924 2.8 9.1 32.1 56.0 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 170 2.9 13.5 63.5 20.0 3.0 0.67 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 217 2.8 8.8 66.4 22.1 3.1 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 204 2.9 8.8 64.2 24.0 3.1 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 92 1.1 16.3 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.71 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 85 0.0 9.4 61.2 29.4 3.2 0.59 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 55 0.0 7.3 63.6 29.1 3.2 0.57 28. Guided student report preparation 53 0.0 7.5 66.0 26.4 3.2 0.56 29. Students free to express opinions 60 0.0 1.7 58.3 40.0 3.4 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 60 0.0 3.3 51.7 45.0 3.4 0.56 31. Developed abil to conduct research 57 1.8 12.3 57.9 28.1 3.1 0.68 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 35 0.0 5.7 60.0 34.3 3.3 0.57 33. Amount of work appropriate 35 0.0 5.7 57.1 37.1 3.3 0.58 34. Instructor explained expectations 34 0.0 2.9 67.6 29.4 3.3 0.51 35. Instructor helped with my problems 33 0.0 3.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.54 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 29 0.0 6.9 65.5 27.6 3.2 0.56 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 3044 Number of forms scanned = 1960 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1943 Percent completed = 63.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.1 A 492 54.9 Sophomore 6 0.7 B 307 34.3 Junior 289 32.2 C 69 7.7 Senior 532 59.3 D 16 1.8 Graduate 62 6.9 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 5 0.6 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.2 Pass or Audit 11 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 276 30.8 Studies Program 16 1.8 2 hours 303 33.8 Required by my major 745 83.3 3 hours 196 21.9 Other (e.g. elective) 133 14.9 4 - 5 hours 79 8.8 6 - 7 hours 29 3.2 8 or more hours 14 1.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 963 1.0 1.0 54.3 43.6 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 931 4.7 15.9 52.2 27.2 3.0 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 940 1.8 7.4 52.6 38.2 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 960 2.6 4.4 45.2 47.8 3.4 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 954 2.0 3.8 46.6 47.6 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 932 1.1 2.8 53.0 43.1 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 961 0.6 2.5 49.1 47.8 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 906 2.8 19.0 50.0 28.3 3.0 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 964 3.0 7.4 46.1 43.6 3.3 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 966 0.1 0.8 36.4 62.6 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 889 0.6 2.5 49.2 47.8 3.4 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 961 1.1 5.6 46.9 46.3 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 960 3.5 10.9 45.6 39.9 3.2 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 958 1.4 10.3 51.4 37.0 3.2 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 771 1.7 11.2 60.6 26.6 3.1 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 950 1.1 5.2 55.5 38.3 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 946 1.4 5.2 55.5 37.9 3.3 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 955 1.4 3.1 55.1 40.4 3.3 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 948 3.9 14.0 49.9 32.2 3.1 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 954 2.0 7.7 43.0 47.4 3.4 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 953 3.8 8.8 32.5 54.9 3.4 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7 2.7 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 71 0.0 4.2 49.3 46.5 3.4 0.58 33. Amount of work appropriate 72 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.50 34. Instructor explained expectations 70 0.0 7.1 47.1 45.7 3.4 0.62 35. Instructor helped with my problems 69 0.0 8.7 44.9 46.4 3.4 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 36 2.8 2.8 47.2 47.2 3.4 0.69 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 70.6 5.9 0.0 5.9 17.6 1.9 1.64 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 1398 Number of forms scanned = 971 Number of forms with at least one student response = 966 Percent completed = 69.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 590 52.2 Sophomore 22 1.9 B 484 42.8 Junior 325 28.4 C 47 4.2 Senior 674 58.9 D 1 0.1 Graduate 121 10.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.1 Pass or Audit 9 0.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 423 37.3 Studies Program 30 2.7 2 hours 359 31.6 Required by my major 976 86.2 3 hours 220 19.4 Other (e.g. elective) 126 11.1 4 - 5 hours 90 7.9 6 - 7 hours 28 2.5 8 or more hours 15 1.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,213 0.4 1.6 54.2 43.9 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,163 2.7 12.3 55.5 29.6 3.1 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,109 0.9 6.8 61.8 30.6 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,099 1.6 5.8 55.3 37.2 3.3 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,190 1.0 5.0 54.1 39.9 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,118 1.3 5.2 57.7 35.8 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,172 0.3 1.5 54.9 43.3 3.4 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,035 2.1 15.3 53.7 28.9 3.1 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,212 1.9 6.8 48.2 43.1 3.3 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,212 0.4 0.8 37.3 61.5 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 1,099 0.4 1.5 55.0 43.1 3.4 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,204 0.4 2.7 50.9 45.9 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,206 3.0 12.2 48.8 36.1 3.2 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 1,190 1.8 7.9 45.5 44.9 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,124 1.1 6.9 62.2 29.9 3.2 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,180 1.2 6.6 60.1 32.1 3.2 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,145 1.7 8.6 60.1 29.5 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,198 0.8 2.8 60.0 36.4 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,177 3.8 19.4 51.2 25.6 3.0 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,200 1.1 8.3 52.1 38.6 3.3 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,196 1.3 8.4 38.1 52.2 3.4 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 21 4.8 0.0 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 23 4.3 0.0 73.9 21.7 3.1 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 29. Students free to express opinions 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 31. Developed abil to conduct research 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 35. Instructor helped with my problems 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1638 Number of forms scanned = 1227 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1217 Percent completed = 74.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 496 54.9 Sophomore 45 5.0 B 372 41.2 Junior 250 27.5 C 30 3.3 Senior 579 63.7 D 1 0.1 Graduate 34 3.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.1 Pass or Audit 5 0.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 347 38.5 Studies Program 8 0.9 2 hours 327 36.3 Required by my major 723 80.2 3 hours 162 18.0 Other (e.g. elective) 170 18.9 4 - 5 hours 49 5.4 6 - 7 hours 10 1.1 8 or more hours 7 0.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 975 0.5 1.6 44.5 53.3 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 823 2.4 5.7 53.7 38.2 3.3 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 929 0.6 4.6 55.9 38.9 3.3 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 955 1.7 6.4 46.3 45.7 3.4 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 970 1.0 4.2 45.8 49.0 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 907 0.8 3.4 49.0 46.9 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 958 1.1 4.0 41.2 53.7 3.5 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 833 1.9 11.5 47.9 38.7 3.2 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 973 1.6 5.7 37.5 55.2 3.5 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 974 0.9 2.7 29.6 66.8 3.6 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 923 0.5 1.1 40.4 58.0 3.6 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 974 0.5 3.0 37.8 58.7 3.5 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 967 1.8 8.7 37.3 52.2 3.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 973 0.7 2.8 33.5 63.0 3.6 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 881 0.9 5.6 52.4 41.1 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 942 1.0 5.0 51.4 42.7 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 923 1.1 8.7 51.6 38.7 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 961 0.8 2.3 47.9 49.0 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 950 1.6 13.8 46.6 38.0 3.2 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 968 0.9 7.5 40.0 51.5 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 966 1.7 8.6 26.1 63.7 3.5 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1673 Number of forms scanned = 986 Number of forms with at least one student response = 976 Percent completed = 58.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 0.4 A 535 41.5 Sophomore 314 24.1 B 523 40.5 Junior 381 29.2 C 202 15.7 Senior 458 35.1 D 23 1.8 Graduate 130 10.0 E/Fail 2 0.2 Professional 4 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 13 1.0 Pass or Audit 5 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 170 13.1 Studies Program 27 2.1 2 hours 345 26.5 Required by my major 1,181 90.9 3 hours 400 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 91 7.0 4 - 5 hours 270 20.8 6 - 7 hours 80 6.2 8 or more hours 35 2.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,362 0.3 2.1 49.2 48.5 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,323 3.8 11.0 52.2 33.1 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,352 1.0 6.8 51.1 41.1 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,337 2.2 7.6 47.9 42.3 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,363 1.5 6.0 48.6 43.9 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,349 1.1 5.5 53.6 39.8 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,351 0.2 1.6 43.6 54.6 3.5 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,258 3.5 24.6 44.8 27.1 3.0 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,356 4.1 13.5 39.8 42.6 3.2 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,361 0.6 1.3 35.6 62.5 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 1,290 0.2 2.2 47.0 50.6 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,357 1.7 5.6 45.0 47.7 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,353 6.7 20.8 39.5 33.0 3.0 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 1,351 2.0 9.5 44.8 43.7 3.3 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,065 2.3 14.9 60.6 22.3 3.0 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,335 1.2 8.9 57.2 32.7 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,332 1.1 10.1 55.0 33.8 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,349 1.3 7.2 52.8 38.8 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,324 8.2 32.2 38.4 21.3 2.7 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,354 3.8 13.4 47.8 35.1 3.1 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,351 4.9 12.1 32.4 50.6 3.3 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 21 4.8 23.8 47.6 23.8 2.9 0.83 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 24 4.2 12.5 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 5.9 11.8 58.8 23.5 3.0 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 11.1 27.8 33.3 27.8 2.8 1.00 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 18 5.6 5.6 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.79 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 29. Students free to express opinions 17 0.0 17.6 29.4 52.9 3.4 0.79 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 31. Developed abil to conduct research 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 1948 Number of forms scanned = 1367 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1365 Percent completed = 70.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 40 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 45 93.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 6.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 6.5 2 hours 2 4.3 Required by my major 25 54.3 3 hours 12 25.5 Other (e.g. elective) 18 39.1 4 - 5 hours 22 46.8 6 - 7 hours 6 12.8 8 or more hours 5 10.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 50 0.0 6.0 32.0 62.0 3.6 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 49 0.0 8.2 42.9 49.0 3.4 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 51 0.0 3.9 39.2 56.9 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 50 2.0 6.0 38.0 54.0 3.4 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 51 0.0 3.9 29.4 66.7 3.6 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 49 2.0 2.0 26.5 69.4 3.6 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 51 0.0 5.9 43.1 51.0 3.5 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 50 0.0 4.0 20.0 76.0 3.7 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 46 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 0.0 4.1 30.6 65.3 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 50 0.0 6.0 32.0 62.0 3.6 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 51 0.0 0.0 19.6 80.4 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 2.2 34.8 63.0 3.6 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 49 0.0 0.0 32.7 67.3 3.7 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 43 0.0 0.0 53.5 46.5 3.5 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 51 0.0 2.0 31.4 66.7 3.6 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 51 0.0 9.8 33.3 56.9 3.5 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 51 2.0 5.9 39.2 52.9 3.4 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 51 2.0 7.8 27.5 62.7 3.5 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 28. Guided student report preparation 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 29. Students free to express opinions 28 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.26 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 31. Developed abil to conduct research 28 0.0 10.7 35.7 53.6 3.4 0.69 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 59 Number of forms scanned = 59 Number of forms with at least one student response = 51 Percent completed = 86.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 316 20.5 A 859 56.1 Sophomore 395 25.6 B 563 36.7 Junior 423 27.4 C 98 6.4 Senior 402 26.0 D 7 0.5 Graduate 5 0.3 E/Fail 3 0.2 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.1 Pass or Audit 2 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 468 30.5 Studies Program 780 51.5 2 hours 530 34.5 Required by my major 572 37.8 3 hours 318 20.7 Other (e.g. elective) 162 10.7 4 - 5 hours 171 11.1 6 - 7 hours 36 2.3 8 or more hours 12 0.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,723 0.5 2.3 41.1 56.1 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,722 5.5 13.0 42.3 39.3 3.2 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,724 2.7 10.3 49.3 37.8 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,358 1.4 5.7 46.4 46.5 3.4 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,729 2.2 8.2 45.1 44.6 3.3 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,728 1.6 7.9 47.9 42.6 3.3 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,728 2.0 6.1 46.8 45.1 3.4 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,716 1.7 6.0 44.3 47.9 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,733 1.0 6.8 40.1 52.1 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,732 0.3 1.4 33.2 65.1 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 1,639 0.7 3.0 41.7 54.5 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,730 0.7 4.6 40.0 54.7 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,708 3.1 15.2 35.3 46.4 3.2 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 1,721 0.6 2.8 34.2 62.5 3.6 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,652 0.7 6.8 49.1 43.5 3.4 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,674 1.3 8.2 48.7 41.8 3.3 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,571 1.7 15.0 46.8 36.5 3.2 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,720 1.0 4.1 49.7 45.3 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,675 6.9 26.5 36.5 30.0 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,712 2.9 9.8 41.5 45.8 3.3 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,708 2.7 6.9 30.4 60.0 3.5 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 444 5.4 25.9 48.2 20.5 2.8 0.81 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 685 2.5 10.5 58.5 28.5 3.1 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 677 3.1 10.0 57.8 29.1 3.1 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 242 3.7 16.1 51.2 28.9 3.1 0.77 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 210 3.3 16.2 54.8 25.7 3.0 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 87 0.0 6.9 48.3 44.8 3.4 0.61 28. Guided student report preparation 80 1.3 10.0 46.3 42.5 3.3 0.70 29. Students free to express opinions 81 1.2 4.9 32.1 61.7 3.5 0.65 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 82 1.2 4.9 46.3 47.6 3.4 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 73 1.4 16.4 45.2 37.0 3.2 0.75 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 34 0.0 8.8 67.6 23.5 3.1 0.56 33. Amount of work appropriate 34 2.9 2.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.67 34. Instructor explained expectations 33 0.0 9.1 60.6 30.3 3.2 0.60 35. Instructor helped with my problems 33 0.0 6.1 63.6 30.3 3.2 0.56 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 32 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.57 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 2099 Number of forms scanned = 2005 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1739 Percent completed = 82.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.3 A 236 67.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 112 32.0 Junior 11 3.1 C 2 0.6 Senior 52 14.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 292 81.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 4.5 Studies Program 13 3.7 2 hours 75 21.1 Required by my major 220 62.5 3 hours 113 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 119 33.8 4 - 5 hours 80 22.5 6 - 7 hours 37 10.4 8 or more hours 34 9.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 370 0.5 2.4 43.2 53.8 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 275 3.6 10.5 51.6 34.2 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 370 1.1 4.1 50.5 44.3 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 293 2.0 7.2 46.8 44.0 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 370 0.3 5.1 50.3 44.3 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 369 1.1 5.1 51.2 42.5 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 369 0.3 5.7 45.3 48.8 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 368 0.5 8.4 53.0 38.0 3.3 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 369 1.6 10.3 42.3 45.8 3.3 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 373 0.3 1.3 25.7 72.7 3.7 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 333 0.3 4.8 48.3 46.5 3.4 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 368 1.1 4.3 44.0 50.5 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 369 1.9 12.5 39.3 46.3 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 367 0.3 5.7 42.8 51.2 3.4 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 316 0.0 5.4 57.9 36.7 3.3 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 360 0.8 6.4 49.4 43.3 3.4 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 336 0.0 11.3 52.1 36.6 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 370 0.3 3.5 48.6 47.6 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 365 3.6 18.1 40.8 37.5 3.1 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 367 1.1 11.2 35.7 52.0 3.4 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 365 1.1 12.9 27.4 58.6 3.4 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 413 Number of forms scanned = 405 Number of forms with at least one student response = 373 Percent completed = 90.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 1.4 A 357 46.2 Sophomore 121 15.5 B 345 44.7 Junior 229 29.3 C 65 8.4 Senior 416 53.2 D 5 0.6 Graduate 2 0.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 0.4 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 151 19.6 Studies Program 11 1.4 2 hours 244 31.6 Required by my major 552 71.7 3 hours 205 26.6 Other (e.g. elective) 207 26.9 4 - 5 hours 109 14.1 6 - 7 hours 35 4.5 8 or more hours 27 3.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 873 0.7 4.5 47.5 47.3 3.4 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 773 2.6 9.3 48.1 40.0 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 866 1.0 5.8 51.2 42.0 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 766 1.6 6.5 50.1 41.8 3.3 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 867 1.3 8.0 49.0 41.8 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 872 0.8 5.7 52.4 41.1 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 865 0.8 4.7 52.1 42.3 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 857 1.2 8.3 48.2 42.4 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 875 2.4 11.3 41.8 44.5 3.3 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 875 0.5 1.3 33.7 64.6 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 820 0.5 3.2 45.9 50.5 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 871 1.6 4.7 43.1 50.6 3.4 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 872 5.0 11.5 38.5 45.0 3.2 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 865 2.2 7.4 43.6 46.8 3.4 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 777 1.0 7.9 56.1 35.0 3.3 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 842 1.1 7.2 51.0 40.7 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 794 1.4 8.9 53.7 36.0 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 866 0.5 4.3 48.7 46.5 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 849 5.7 15.2 42.3 36.9 3.1 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 861 2.9 10.6 38.1 48.4 3.3 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 859 3.7 11.6 29.2 55.4 3.4 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 23 4.3 17.4 43.5 34.8 3.1 0.85 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 15 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 31. Developed abil to conduct research 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 33. Amount of work appropriate 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 34. Instructor explained expectations 16 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.68 35. Instructor helped with my problems 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1261 Number of forms scanned = 919 Number of forms with at least one student response = 876 Percent completed = 69.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.6 A 136 84.5 Sophomore 12 7.3 B 25 15.5 Junior 34 20.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 25 15.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 92 55.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.6 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 38 23.0 Studies Program 8 4.8 2 hours 28 17.0 Required by my major 106 64.2 3 hours 35 21.2 Other (e.g. elective) 51 30.9 4 - 5 hours 19 11.5 6 - 7 hours 5 3.0 8 or more hours 40 24.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 174 2.3 4.0 36.8 56.9 3.5 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 149 2.7 1.3 47.7 48.3 3.4 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 170 1.8 2.4 47.6 48.2 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 135 0.7 3.0 40.0 56.3 3.5 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 163 2.5 5.5 36.8 55.2 3.4 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 168 3.0 6.5 45.2 45.2 3.3 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 162 1.2 5.6 34.0 59.3 3.5 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 161 0.6 3.1 42.2 54.0 3.5 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 171 0.0 4.7 45.6 49.7 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 174 0.6 1.7 32.2 65.5 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 170 0.0 2.4 37.1 60.6 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 173 0.0 6.4 40.5 53.2 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 174 0.6 4.0 46.0 49.4 3.4 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 174 0.0 1.1 36.8 62.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 171 0.0 1.8 42.1 56.1 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 171 0.0 2.9 47.4 49.7 3.5 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 168 1.8 7.1 43.5 47.6 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 172 0.0 2.3 38.4 59.3 3.6 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 171 2.9 5.8 40.4 50.9 3.4 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 173 1.2 5.8 37.0 56.1 3.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 172 1.2 5.2 31.4 62.2 3.5 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 28. Guided student report preparation 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 29. Students free to express opinions 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 31. Developed abil to conduct research 15 6.7 26.7 33.3 33.3 2.9 0.96 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 202 Number of forms scanned = 177 Number of forms with at least one student response = 175 Percent completed = 86.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Administration and Supervision SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 83 89.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 10.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 80 85.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 13 13.8 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 1.1 Studies Program 8 8.6 2 hours 20 21.3 Required by my major 80 86.0 3 hours 29 30.9 Other (e.g. elective) 5 5.4 4 - 5 hours 24 25.5 6 - 7 hours 11 11.7 8 or more hours 9 9.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 101 0.0 1.0 28.7 70.3 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 97 0.0 16.5 40.2 43.3 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 99 0.0 2.0 42.4 55.6 3.5 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 48 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 97 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 100 0.0 1.0 38.0 61.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 101 0.0 2.0 32.7 65.3 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 101 0.0 0.0 29.7 70.3 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 101 1.0 1.0 41.6 56.4 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 101 0.0 1.0 22.8 76.2 3.8 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 96 0.0 1.0 37.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 101 0.0 2.0 34.7 63.4 3.6 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 101 1.0 1.0 42.6 55.4 3.5 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 101 0.0 3.0 26.7 70.3 3.7 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 98 0.0 2.0 41.8 56.1 3.5 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 101 1.0 1.0 33.7 64.4 3.6 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 101 1.0 4.0 38.6 56.4 3.5 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 101 1.0 1.0 34.7 63.4 3.6 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 100 1.0 5.0 48.0 46.0 3.4 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 100 0.0 2.0 31.0 67.0 3.7 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 99 0.0 1.0 26.3 72.7 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 7.7 38.5 46.2 3.2 0.93 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 12.5 43.8 6.3 12.5 25.0 2.9 1.48 38. Question 38 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 4.4 0.62 39. Question 39 16 12.5 87.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.34 40. Question 40 15 13.3 6.7 80.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.72 41. Question 41 16 0.0 6.3 0.0 37.5 56.3 4.4 0.81 42. Question 42 16 56.3 31.3 0.0 0.0 12.5 1.8 1.33 43. Question 43 16 56.3 25.0 6.3 0.0 12.5 1.9 1.36 44. Question 44 16 6.3 0.0 25.0 43.8 25.0 3.8 1.05 45. Question 45 13 53.8 30.8 0.0 7.7 7.7 1.8 1.28 46. Question 46 13 7.7 46.2 30.8 15.4 0.0 2.5 0.88 47. Question 47 12 41.7 41.7 8.3 8.3 0.0 1.8 0.94 48. Question 48 13 38.5 23.1 23.1 15.4 0.0 2.2 1.14 49. Question 49 13 15.4 69.2 0.0 15.4 0.0 2.2 0.90 Number of forms preslugged = at least 115 Number of forms scanned = 101 Number of forms with at least one student response = 101 Percent completed = 87.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Curriculum and Instruction SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.2 A 425 79.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 103 19.3 Junior 11 2.0 C 4 0.7 Senior 334 62.0 D 1 0.2 Graduate 165 30.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 5 0.9 I 1 0.2 Other 23 4.3 Pass or Audit 1 0.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 105 19.7 Studies Program 6 1.1 2 hours 123 23.0 Required by my major 476 89.1 3 hours 102 19.1 Other (e.g. elective) 52 9.7 4 - 5 hours 84 15.7 6 - 7 hours 32 6.0 8 or more hours 88 16.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 557 0.2 2.5 32.7 64.6 3.6 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 449 2.2 7.6 41.0 49.2 3.4 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 530 1.7 6.0 43.0 49.2 3.4 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 345 2.3 8.4 29.9 59.4 3.5 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 487 1.8 6.0 37.0 55.2 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 519 1.0 5.4 41.8 51.8 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 468 2.1 7.3 33.5 57.1 3.5 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 481 3.1 6.2 28.9 61.7 3.5 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 551 4.4 8.2 30.1 57.4 3.4 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 559 0.9 1.3 25.8 72.1 3.7 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 528 0.6 0.9 35.6 62.9 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 559 2.7 5.4 31.8 60.1 3.5 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 559 4.5 5.9 33.6 56.0 3.4 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 557 1.3 2.0 28.4 68.4 3.6 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 527 1.9 4.0 37.2 56.9 3.5 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 533 2.4 4.1 37.3 56.1 3.5 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 522 2.5 5.4 39.5 52.7 3.4 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 556 1.6 3.1 35.4 59.9 3.5 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 527 3.6 12.0 33.0 51.4 3.3 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 556 2.7 9.4 30.9 57.0 3.4 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 554 4.3 9.0 26.5 60.1 3.4 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 5.3 5.3 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 6.3 0.0 50.0 43.8 3.3 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 42 2.4 7.1 23.8 66.7 3.5 0.74 28. Guided student report preparation 40 2.5 15.0 27.5 55.0 3.4 0.83 29. Students free to express opinions 44 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.57 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 44 0.0 11.4 29.5 59.1 3.5 0.70 31. Developed abil to conduct research 40 0.0 15.0 32.5 52.5 3.4 0.74 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 18.2 0.0 54.5 27.3 2.9 1.04 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 671 Number of forms scanned = 569 Number of forms with at least one student response = 565 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Educational and Counseling Psych. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 421 76.8 Sophomore 62 11.3 B 111 20.3 Junior 117 21.3 C 10 1.8 Senior 59 10.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 301 54.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 7 1.3 I 1 0.2 Other 4 0.7 Pass or Audit 5 0.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 76 13.8 Studies Program 9 1.6 2 hours 164 29.8 Required by my major 476 86.7 3 hours 138 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 64 11.7 4 - 5 hours 90 16.3 6 - 7 hours 30 5.4 8 or more hours 53 9.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 580 0.3 1.9 35.5 62.2 3.6 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 546 3.7 9.2 48.4 38.8 3.2 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 576 1.2 3.0 44.6 51.2 3.5 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 429 2.3 7.9 38.0 51.7 3.4 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 548 0.4 2.6 41.4 55.7 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 579 1.2 4.1 41.8 52.8 3.5 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 558 0.5 2.7 39.2 57.5 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 545 1.3 5.0 40.7 53.0 3.5 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 578 1.6 8.3 39.3 50.9 3.4 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 578 0.2 1.4 26.3 72.1 3.7 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 516 1.2 2.7 43.8 52.3 3.5 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 575 0.9 3.1 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 578 2.9 8.5 38.2 50.3 3.4 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 578 0.3 1.4 30.4 67.8 3.7 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 541 0.4 2.0 46.8 50.8 3.5 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 572 0.7 4.9 42.7 51.7 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 556 0.7 8.5 44.1 46.8 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 577 0.7 2.6 38.3 58.4 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 569 4.6 16.9 39.5 39.0 3.1 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 578 1.4 7.8 37.5 53.3 3.4 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 576 2.4 8.0 30.2 59.4 3.5 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 683 Number of forms scanned = 583 Number of forms with at least one student response = 580 Percent completed = 84.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Educational Policy Studies & Eval SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 164 64.3 Sophomore 16 6.2 B 74 29.0 Junior 77 29.7 C 12 4.7 Senior 34 13.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 121 46.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 6 2.3 I 1 0.4 Other 5 1.9 Pass or Audit 4 1.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 36 14.1 Studies Program 6 2.4 2 hours 45 17.6 Required by my major 165 65.5 3 hours 73 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 81 32.1 4 - 5 hours 68 26.7 6 - 7 hours 22 8.6 8 or more hours 11 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 277 0.4 3.2 38.3 58.1 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 259 2.7 8.9 39.0 49.4 3.4 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 273 0.4 6.2 38.5 54.9 3.5 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 194 0.0 4.6 40.7 54.6 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 253 2.0 8.7 40.7 48.6 3.4 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 271 1.8 5.9 41.0 51.3 3.4 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 250 0.8 4.0 37.2 58.0 3.5 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 250 1.2 8.8 37.2 52.8 3.4 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 277 1.4 7.9 39.4 51.3 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 277 0.4 1.8 27.8 70.0 3.7 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 267 0.0 0.7 38.6 60.7 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 277 0.7 4.7 33.2 61.4 3.6 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 275 1.5 11.6 33.1 53.8 3.4 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 277 0.7 2.5 28.2 68.6 3.6 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 256 0.4 5.1 43.0 51.6 3.5 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 271 0.4 6.6 41.3 51.7 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 253 0.0 13.0 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 272 0.4 3.7 41.2 54.8 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 270 1.9 20.7 31.1 46.3 3.2 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 277 0.4 10.1 34.7 54.9 3.4 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 276 0.7 11.6 23.6 64.1 3.5 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 5.6 0.0 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 27 0.0 3.7 18.5 77.8 3.7 0.53 28. Guided student report preparation 31 0.0 3.2 22.6 74.2 3.7 0.53 29. Students free to express opinions 33 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 32 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 31. Developed abil to conduct research 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 351 Number of forms scanned = 290 Number of forms with at least one student response = 277 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Kinesiology and Health Promotion SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 74 7.5 A 677 69.7 Sophomore 136 13.8 B 233 24.0 Junior 237 24.1 C 28 2.9 Senior 423 43.0 D 2 0.2 Graduate 103 10.5 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 3 0.3 I 2 0.2 Other 7 0.7 Pass or Audit 29 3.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 596 61.2 Studies Program 24 2.5 2 hours 201 20.6 Required by my major 607 62.3 3 hours 116 11.9 Other (e.g. elective) 344 35.3 4 - 5 hours 46 4.7 6 - 7 hours 10 1.0 8 or more hours 5 0.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,069 0.1 1.3 43.3 55.3 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 899 2.9 8.6 45.5 43.0 3.3 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 978 0.6 5.3 50.0 44.1 3.4 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 995 0.6 4.3 46.2 48.8 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,056 0.3 2.4 46.4 50.9 3.5 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,009 0.5 3.1 49.3 47.2 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,037 0.6 4.1 48.0 47.3 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 956 0.2 9.4 47.1 43.3 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,073 0.1 3.5 42.2 54.1 3.5 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,078 0.1 1.0 34.2 64.7 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 1,021 0.2 1.5 42.9 55.4 3.5 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,071 0.5 2.0 39.7 57.9 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,068 1.0 7.3 41.2 50.5 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 1,070 0.4 1.9 36.4 61.4 3.6 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 912 0.7 6.0 50.0 43.3 3.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 961 0.7 5.9 48.3 45.1 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 931 1.0 8.7 47.4 43.0 3.3 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,047 0.4 1.7 46.7 51.2 3.5 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,009 2.1 13.5 42.4 42.0 3.2 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,062 1.1 6.8 40.3 51.8 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,057 0.7 5.9 31.7 61.8 3.5 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 46 0.0 8.7 43.5 47.8 3.4 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 59 5.1 5.1 42.4 47.5 3.3 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 51 2.0 3.9 45.1 49.0 3.4 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 39 0.0 10.3 35.9 53.8 3.4 0.68 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 41 0.0 9.8 34.1 56.1 3.5 0.67 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 63 0.0 3.2 46.0 50.8 3.5 0.56 28. Guided student report preparation 63 0.0 0.0 50.8 49.2 3.5 0.50 29. Students free to express opinions 66 0.0 4.5 42.4 53.0 3.5 0.59 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 66 0.0 1.5 45.5 53.0 3.5 0.53 31. Developed abil to conduct research 54 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.58 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 61 0.0 1.6 26.2 72.1 3.7 0.49 33. Amount of work appropriate 61 0.0 0.0 26.2 73.8 3.7 0.44 34. Instructor explained expectations 60 0.0 1.7 26.7 71.7 3.7 0.50 35. Instructor helped with my problems 60 1.7 3.3 25.0 70.0 3.6 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 59 0.0 3.4 25.4 71.2 3.7 0.54 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1395 Number of forms scanned = 1090 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1079 Percent completed = 77.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Special Educ and Rehab Counseling SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.5 A 155 77.5 Sophomore 30 15.1 B 38 19.0 Junior 51 25.6 C 6 3.0 Senior 62 31.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 49 24.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 3 1.5 I 0 0.0 Other 3 1.5 Pass or Audit 1 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 33 16.6 Studies Program 2 1.0 2 hours 63 31.7 Required by my major 170 85.4 3 hours 47 23.6 Other (e.g. elective) 27 13.6 4 - 5 hours 32 16.1 6 - 7 hours 6 3.0 8 or more hours 18 9.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 212 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 190 5.3 6.8 35.3 52.6 3.4 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 212 0.9 1.9 29.7 67.5 3.6 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 154 0.0 1.3 25.3 73.4 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 210 0.0 5.2 25.2 69.5 3.6 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 210 0.5 3.3 30.0 66.2 3.6 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 211 0.0 0.9 26.5 72.5 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 209 0.0 1.0 31.1 67.9 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 211 0.9 5.7 21.3 72.0 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 212 0.0 1.4 17.5 81.1 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 203 0.0 0.0 24.6 75.4 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 212 0.5 1.4 23.1 75.0 3.7 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 211 0.9 4.3 24.6 70.1 3.6 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 211 0.0 0.5 25.1 74.4 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 202 0.0 1.5 32.2 66.3 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 210 0.0 1.4 30.0 68.6 3.7 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 209 0.0 2.9 34.9 62.2 3.6 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 212 0.0 1.9 27.8 70.3 3.7 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 210 1.4 9.0 29.5 60.0 3.5 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 209 0.0 5.3 19.6 75.1 3.7 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 208 1.4 5.8 18.8 74.0 3.7 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 246 Number of forms scanned = 216 Number of forms with at least one student response = 212 Percent completed = 86.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Civil Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 32 3.5 A 406 45.5 Sophomore 62 6.9 B 416 46.6 Junior 153 16.9 C 62 6.9 Senior 556 61.5 D 7 0.8 Graduate 98 10.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 3 0.3 I 1 0.1 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 178 19.8 Studies Program 10 1.1 2 hours 203 22.6 Required by my major 762 84.7 3 hours 195 21.7 Other (e.g. elective) 128 14.2 4 - 5 hours 210 23.4 6 - 7 hours 72 8.0 8 or more hours 41 4.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 939 1.0 2.9 68.5 27.7 3.2 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 800 10.1 18.6 53.1 18.1 2.8 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 927 1.8 7.2 65.2 25.8 3.1 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 851 4.3 9.4 58.3 28.0 3.1 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 937 3.4 8.5 60.1 28.0 3.1 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 935 1.9 6.3 64.9 26.8 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 921 1.8 5.3 63.0 29.9 3.2 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 897 4.6 21.9 54.1 19.5 2.9 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 936 3.8 16.6 52.0 27.6 3.0 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 937 0.7 2.8 49.1 47.4 3.4 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 896 1.6 5.8 61.8 30.8 3.2 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 934 1.5 8.0 59.7 30.7 3.2 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 932 4.9 20.8 51.9 22.3 2.9 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 928 1.9 9.9 61.9 26.3 3.1 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 761 2.6 10.5 66.6 20.2 3.0 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 912 1.2 5.6 68.9 24.3 3.2 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 914 1.2 5.9 69.1 23.7 3.2 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 923 1.5 4.7 68.7 25.1 3.2 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 911 6.6 28.1 48.6 16.7 2.8 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 921 2.7 15.1 55.8 26.4 3.1 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 920 4.7 15.3 46.8 33.2 3.1 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 24 4.2 4.2 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 25 8.0 0.0 52.0 40.0 3.2 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 24 4.2 4.2 45.8 45.8 3.3 0.76 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 23 4.3 4.3 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.75 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 24 4.2 0.0 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 29 3.4 10.3 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.72 28. Guided student report preparation 30 3.3 3.3 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.66 29. Students free to express opinions 31 3.2 0.0 64.5 32.3 3.3 0.63 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 30 3.3 0.0 66.7 30.0 3.2 0.63 31. Developed abil to conduct research 26 3.8 7.7 53.8 34.6 3.2 0.75 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 118 5.1 14.4 62.7 17.8 2.9 0.72 33. Amount of work appropriate 118 20.3 18.6 47.5 13.6 2.5 0.97 34. Instructor explained expectations 119 2.5 8.4 69.7 19.3 3.1 0.61 35. Instructor helped with my problems 118 2.5 11.9 68.6 16.9 3.0 0.63 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 119 5.9 15.1 63.0 16.0 2.9 0.73 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 4.2 0.75 38. Question 38 11 27.3 9.1 45.5 9.1 9.1 2.6 1.29 39. Question 39 10 10.0 10.0 30.0 40.0 10.0 3.3 1.16 40. Question 40 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 3.8 0.60 41. Question 41 11 18.2 18.2 27.3 36.4 0.0 2.8 1.17 42. Question 42 11 9.1 18.2 36.4 27.3 9.1 3.1 1.14 43. Question 43 11 9.1 9.1 18.2 54.5 9.1 3.5 1.13 44. Question 44 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 3.4 0.84 45. Question 45 11 36.4 27.3 18.2 9.1 9.1 2.3 1.35 46. Question 46 11 18.2 54.5 27.3 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.70 47. Question 47 11 9.1 18.2 45.5 18.2 9.1 3.0 1.10 48. Question 48 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 45.5 9.1 3.5 0.82 Number of forms preslugged = at least 1099 Number of forms scanned = 959 Number of forms with at least one student response = 945 Percent completed = 86.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Chemical & Materials Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 26 6.2 A 211 50.5 Sophomore 15 3.6 B 145 34.7 Junior 94 22.3 C 53 12.7 Senior 227 53.8 D 4 1.0 Graduate 58 13.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.5 Pass or Audit 5 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 91 21.8 Studies Program 8 1.9 2 hours 49 11.7 Required by my major 354 84.5 3 hours 99 23.7 Other (e.g. elective) 57 13.6 4 - 5 hours 89 21.3 6 - 7 hours 39 9.3 8 or more hours 51 12.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 444 0.9 7.4 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 337 6.2 15.7 51.0 27.0 3.0 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 438 2.3 10.0 57.8 29.9 3.2 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 334 0.3 8.7 54.5 36.5 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 446 2.7 13.9 54.3 29.1 3.1 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 445 1.8 4.7 60.0 33.5 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 443 5.2 8.6 53.0 33.2 3.1 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 439 3.4 16.6 58.3 21.6 3.0 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 436 2.8 16.7 52.8 27.8 3.1 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 445 1.1 4.7 47.2 47.0 3.4 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 423 1.2 4.5 54.6 39.7 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 439 2.1 7.5 56.7 33.7 3.2 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 431 8.1 23.0 45.2 23.7 2.8 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 432 2.1 11.3 54.2 32.4 3.2 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 348 1.4 13.2 64.9 20.4 3.0 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 441 2.0 7.9 61.9 28.1 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 435 1.6 9.4 58.6 30.3 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 444 2.0 8.8 59.2 30.0 3.2 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 423 10.2 28.6 42.3 18.9 2.7 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 445 7.2 18.4 47.9 26.5 2.9 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 443 5.0 18.7 44.0 32.3 3.0 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 21 4.8 9.5 33.3 52.4 3.3 0.86 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 24 0.0 8.3 29.2 62.5 3.5 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 10.5 0.0 36.8 52.6 3.3 0.95 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 8.3 0.0 16.7 75.0 3.6 0.90 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 33 3.0 27.3 45.5 24.2 2.9 0.80 28. Guided student report preparation 32 15.6 21.9 43.8 18.8 2.7 0.97 29. Students free to express opinions 38 2.6 13.2 50.0 34.2 3.2 0.75 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 33 3.0 12.1 48.5 36.4 3.2 0.77 31. Developed abil to conduct research 33 3.0 21.2 36.4 39.4 3.1 0.86 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 59 16.9 20.3 44.1 18.6 2.6 0.98 33. Amount of work appropriate 63 11.1 17.5 54.0 17.5 2.8 0.87 34. Instructor explained expectations 63 17.5 28.6 38.1 15.9 2.5 0.96 35. Instructor helped with my problems 62 21.0 21.0 40.3 17.7 2.5 1.02 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 58 24.1 24.1 39.7 12.1 2.4 0.99 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 160 3.8 3.8 20.0 26.3 46.3 4.1 1.07 38. Question 38 161 1.2 8.7 18.6 31.7 39.8 4.0 1.02 39. Question 39 161 2.5 9.3 13.0 41.6 33.5 3.9 1.03 40. Question 40 142 4.9 10.6 19.0 34.5 31.0 3.8 1.15 41. Question 41 145 3.4 11.7 22.8 33.1 29.0 3.7 1.11 42. Question 42 100 3.0 10.0 19.0 39.0 29.0 3.8 1.06 43. Question 43 78 5.1 6.4 37.2 24.4 26.9 3.6 1.11 44. Question 44 32 9.4 15.6 31.3 21.9 21.9 3.3 1.26 45. Question 45 43 2.3 0.0 41.9 34.9 20.9 3.7 0.88 46. Question 46 20 5.0 5.0 65.0 20.0 5.0 3.2 0.81 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 544 Number of forms scanned = 452 Number of forms with at least one student response = 450 Percent completed = 82.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Computer Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 246 17.4 A 823 58.6 Sophomore 357 25.2 B 438 31.2 Junior 297 21.0 C 118 8.4 Senior 272 19.2 D 9 0.6 Graduate 216 15.3 E/Fail 4 0.3 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 25 1.8 Pass or Audit 12 0.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 265 18.8 Studies Program 75 5.3 2 hours 314 22.3 Required by my major 1,072 76.4 3 hours 363 25.8 Other (e.g. elective) 257 18.3 4 - 5 hours 274 19.5 6 - 7 hours 99 7.0 8 or more hours 93 6.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,574 1.5 7.4 59.2 31.9 3.2 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,528 4.2 10.0 54.0 31.8 3.1 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,574 2.3 8.6 56.2 33.0 3.2 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,551 1.9 8.3 57.1 32.7 3.2 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,568 2.3 10.0 55.5 32.1 3.2 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,565 2.7 8.9 59.2 29.3 3.2 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,549 6.3 12.9 55.8 25.0 3.0 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,505 7.1 27.0 46.4 19.5 2.8 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,584 7.7 17.7 47.9 26.7 2.9 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,585 1.5 4.3 51.0 43.2 3.4 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 1,433 1.8 5.7 57.7 34.8 3.3 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,558 4.4 10.3 53.1 32.2 3.1 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,576 10.7 23.4 40.8 25.1 2.8 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 1,545 7.8 20.7 45.8 25.8 2.9 0.87 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,236 4.7 19.4 54.2 21.7 2.9 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,515 3.9 12.3 58.7 25.1 3.1 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,520 3.8 13.0 57.0 26.2 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,558 3.2 8.1 59.3 29.4 3.1 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,538 10.8 26.6 40.8 21.8 2.7 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,566 7.4 21.6 43.7 27.3 2.9 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,558 9.7 19.8 37.5 32.9 2.9 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 135 7.4 14.1 52.6 25.9 3.0 0.84 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 147 8.2 19.7 48.3 23.8 2.9 0.87 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 116 6.0 12.1 51.7 30.2 3.1 0.82 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 88 6.8 12.5 46.6 34.1 3.1 0.86 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 83 4.8 13.3 49.4 32.5 3.1 0.81 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 58 5.2 5.2 50.0 39.7 3.2 0.78 28. Guided student report preparation 53 7.5 9.4 43.4 39.6 3.2 0.89 29. Students free to express opinions 61 9.8 4.9 49.2 36.1 3.1 0.90 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 61 6.6 4.9 50.8 37.7 3.2 0.81 31. Developed abil to conduct research 59 5.1 8.5 49.2 37.3 3.2 0.80 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 203 7.4 15.3 50.7 26.6 3.0 0.85 33. Amount of work appropriate 198 8.1 12.6 55.1 24.2 3.0 0.83 34. Instructor explained expectations 202 6.4 12.9 53.5 27.2 3.0 0.81 35. Instructor helped with my problems 199 6.0 12.6 56.3 25.1 3.0 0.79 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 167 4.8 7.2 59.9 28.1 3.1 0.73 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 38. Question 38 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 39. Question 39 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 40. Question 40 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 4.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 2964 Number of forms scanned = 1626 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1596 Percent completed = 53.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Electrical Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 39 5.1 A 303 40.1 Sophomore 59 7.7 B 287 38.0 Junior 206 27.0 C 79 10.4 Senior 356 46.7 D 22 2.9 Graduate 97 12.7 E/Fail 3 0.4 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 4 0.5 Pass or Audit 62 8.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 108 14.2 Studies Program 16 2.1 2 hours 112 14.7 Required by my major 641 84.1 3 hours 189 24.8 Other (e.g. elective) 105 13.8 4 - 5 hours 215 28.2 6 - 7 hours 83 10.9 8 or more hours 56 7.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 789 2.3 5.6 55.5 36.6 3.3 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 707 7.9 16.1 51.5 24.5 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 788 2.3 11.3 54.8 31.6 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 708 4.5 11.7 52.8 30.9 3.1 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 792 5.9 8.6 50.8 34.7 3.1 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 795 3.5 9.1 52.8 34.6 3.2 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 790 3.3 7.5 54.8 34.4 3.2 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 777 6.6 27.0 44.0 22.4 2.8 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 791 6.2 14.2 47.2 32.5 3.1 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 796 0.9 3.4 40.6 55.2 3.5 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 725 1.7 6.2 49.8 42.3 3.3 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 792 2.1 9.5 50.3 38.1 3.2 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 786 7.3 18.2 44.3 30.3 3.0 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 777 5.4 18.1 49.7 26.8 3.0 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 573 2.1 14.5 60.2 23.2 3.0 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 767 1.6 10.0 58.0 30.4 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 767 1.8 10.2 57.9 30.1 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 780 1.5 8.8 56.5 33.1 3.2 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 766 6.8 23.2 44.4 25.6 2.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 791 5.9 18.2 45.1 30.7 3.0 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 789 8.5 16.5 35.2 39.8 3.1 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 36 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 38 2.6 2.6 52.6 42.1 3.3 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 31 3.2 12.9 35.5 48.4 3.3 0.82 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 26 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.78 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 34 0.0 2.9 44.1 52.9 3.5 0.56 28. Guided student report preparation 29 0.0 3.4 31.0 65.5 3.6 0.56 29. Students free to express opinions 43 2.3 2.3 44.2 51.2 3.4 0.67 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 42 2.4 0.0 47.6 50.0 3.5 0.63 31. Developed abil to conduct research 37 2.7 5.4 45.9 45.9 3.4 0.72 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 87 3.4 17.2 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.75 33. Amount of work appropriate 89 6.7 22.5 53.9 16.9 2.8 0.80 34. Instructor explained expectations 89 7.9 20.2 48.3 23.6 2.9 0.86 35. Instructor helped with my problems 87 6.9 14.9 51.7 26.4 3.0 0.83 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 90 5.6 13.3 57.8 23.3 3.0 0.77 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 390 2.3 3.3 19.0 42.8 32.6 4.0 0.93 38. Question 38 389 2.3 4.1 21.1 43.4 29.0 3.9 0.93 39. Question 39 387 3.1 7.8 18.6 41.6 28.9 3.9 1.02 40. Question 40 301 3.7 11.0 21.9 40.9 22.6 3.7 1.05 41. Question 41 224 3.6 11.6 21.0 37.1 26.8 3.7 1.09 42. Question 42 180 6.7 10.0 29.4 37.2 16.7 3.5 1.09 43. Question 43 147 2.0 11.6 21.1 45.6 19.7 3.7 0.98 44. Question 44 51 5.9 5.9 7.8 49.0 31.4 3.9 1.08 45. Question 45 37 2.7 13.5 5.4 37.8 40.5 4.0 1.13 46. Question 46 30 20.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 2.8 1.35 Number of forms preslugged = at least 1104 Number of forms scanned = 815 Number of forms with at least one student response = 810 Percent completed = 73.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. - Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 193 93.7 A 91 45.3 Sophomore 13 6.3 B 90 44.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 19 9.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 57 27.8 Studies Program 6 2.9 2 hours 48 23.4 Required by my major 137 66.8 3 hours 54 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 62 30.2 4 - 5 hours 24 11.7 6 - 7 hours 20 9.8 8 or more hours 2 1.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 237 0.4 8.4 57.8 33.3 3.2 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 233 10.3 15.9 54.5 19.3 2.8 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 242 5.0 12.0 62.0 21.1 3.0 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 207 1.4 7.2 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 244 0.8 5.3 62.3 31.6 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 241 0.0 4.6 68.9 26.6 3.2 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 243 1.6 2.9 67.5 28.0 3.2 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 234 2.1 15.0 57.7 25.2 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 235 2.1 6.4 60.0 31.5 3.2 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 238 0.0 2.1 57.1 40.8 3.4 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 225 2.2 4.9 60.4 32.4 3.2 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 226 1.8 4.4 58.0 35.8 3.3 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 234 6.0 12.8 52.6 28.6 3.0 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 221 2.3 7.2 60.2 30.3 3.2 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 200 2.5 8.5 65.5 23.5 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 234 1.7 8.1 58.5 31.6 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 234 2.1 8.1 58.1 31.6 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 238 3.4 8.4 60.9 27.3 3.1 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 231 10.0 19.9 46.3 23.8 2.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 252 7.5 13.9 53.2 25.4 3.0 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 249 3.6 8.4 48.2 39.8 3.2 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 11.1 11.1 33.3 44.4 3.1 1.02 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 10.5 15.8 36.8 36.8 3.0 1.00 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 6.3 12.5 37.5 43.8 3.2 0.91 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 16 6.3 25.0 25.0 43.8 3.1 1.00 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 7.1 14.3 21.4 57.1 3.3 0.99 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.81 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 3.0 1.05 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 50 0.0 10.0 52.0 38.0 3.3 0.64 33. Amount of work appropriate 53 1.9 30.2 37.7 30.2 3.0 0.83 34. Instructor explained expectations 53 1.9 7.5 50.9 39.6 3.3 0.69 35. Instructor helped with my problems 53 0.0 5.7 49.1 45.3 3.4 0.60 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 52 0.0 5.8 48.1 46.2 3.4 0.60 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 335 Number of forms scanned = 268 Number of forms with at least one student response = 266 Percent completed = 79.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Mechanical Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 85 8.0 A 453 43.0 Sophomore 57 5.4 B 431 40.9 Junior 289 27.2 C 143 13.6 Senior 538 50.6 D 17 1.6 Graduate 88 8.3 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 4 0.4 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.2 Pass or Audit 9 0.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 191 17.9 Studies Program 10 0.9 2 hours 112 10.5 Required by my major 972 91.6 3 hours 230 21.6 Other (e.g. elective) 79 7.4 4 - 5 hours 249 23.4 6 - 7 hours 140 13.1 8 or more hours 143 13.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,177 0.5 4.2 66.4 29.0 3.2 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,109 6.8 14.8 56.3 22.2 2.9 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,164 1.6 6.6 60.7 31.0 3.2 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,072 1.5 7.1 59.6 31.8 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,159 1.6 6.3 63.2 28.9 3.2 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,166 1.6 8.1 61.5 28.7 3.2 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,152 4.2 13.5 51.5 30.9 3.1 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,125 4.7 22.6 54.1 18.6 2.9 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,178 3.6 12.8 54.9 28.7 3.1 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,176 0.3 1.7 47.5 50.5 3.5 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 1,088 1.8 8.2 54.0 36.0 3.2 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,167 1.8 6.4 58.9 32.9 3.2 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,152 4.6 18.7 55.1 21.6 2.9 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 1,139 2.5 16.1 59.6 21.8 3.0 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 910 2.2 13.7 67.7 16.4 3.0 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,141 1.8 6.7 62.0 29.6 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,144 1.9 7.8 59.9 30.4 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,160 1.7 5.5 64.3 28.4 3.2 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,126 5.9 28.9 49.6 15.6 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,177 4.2 13.5 52.3 30.0 3.1 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,174 4.8 14.6 42.8 37.9 3.1 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 30 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 35 2.9 14.3 65.7 17.1 3.0 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 26 0.0 19.2 57.7 23.1 3.0 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 20 5.0 25.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.89 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 20 5.0 15.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.83 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 28. Guided student report preparation 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 29. Students free to express opinions 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 18 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.73 31. Developed abil to conduct research 18 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.76 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 28 7.1 7.1 53.6 32.1 3.1 0.83 33. Amount of work appropriate 29 3.4 13.8 55.2 27.6 3.1 0.75 34. Instructor explained expectations 29 13.8 3.4 58.6 24.1 2.9 0.92 35. Instructor helped with my problems 29 6.9 6.9 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.80 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 29 13.8 6.9 55.2 24.1 2.9 0.94 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 664 0.6 2.9 20.2 53.3 23.0 4.0 0.77 38. Question 38 663 0.9 4.5 18.6 51.3 24.7 3.9 0.83 39. Question 39 664 1.2 5.0 22.1 48.6 23.0 3.9 0.86 40. Question 40 610 1.0 4.4 20.8 49.2 24.6 3.9 0.85 41. Question 41 558 1.1 7.0 19.9 49.3 22.8 3.9 0.89 42. Question 42 428 0.5 3.0 20.3 53.3 22.9 4.0 0.77 43. Question 43 372 1.9 3.2 22.3 50.0 22.6 3.9 0.86 44. Question 44 318 1.3 5.0 25.2 47.2 21.4 3.8 0.87 45. Question 45 181 0.6 3.9 22.1 51.4 22.1 3.9 0.80 46. Question 46 110 0.0 3.6 21.8 54.5 20.0 3.9 0.75 47. Question 47 73 0.0 2.7 12.3 61.6 23.3 4.1 0.68 48. Question 48 34 2.9 0.0 8.8 67.6 20.6 4.0 0.76 49. Question 49 6 16.7 0.0 0.0 66.7 16.7 3.7 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 1546 Number of forms scanned = 1193 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1185 Percent completed = 76.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Mining Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 2.2 A 49 54.4 Sophomore 7 7.7 B 35 38.9 Junior 20 22.0 C 5 5.6 Senior 53 58.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 9.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 11.1 Studies Program 1 1.1 2 hours 17 18.9 Required by my major 80 88.9 3 hours 31 34.4 Other (e.g. elective) 9 10.0 4 - 5 hours 23 25.6 6 - 7 hours 7 7.8 8 or more hours 2 2.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 97 6.2 14.4 50.5 28.9 3.0 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 62 11.3 29.0 37.1 22.6 2.7 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 96 9.4 6.3 52.1 32.3 3.1 0.87 4. Exams reflected what was taught 93 17.2 16.1 44.1 22.6 2.7 1.00 5. Grading was fair and consistent 97 8.2 15.5 48.5 27.8 3.0 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 98 4.1 5.1 63.3 27.6 3.1 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 97 6.2 9.3 57.7 26.8 3.1 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 93 5.4 18.3 47.3 29.0 3.0 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 97 10.3 17.5 43.3 28.9 2.9 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 98 3.1 6.1 52.0 38.8 3.3 0.71 11. Was available for consultation 93 5.4 9.7 49.5 35.5 3.2 0.81 12. Satisfact answered class questions 98 4.1 12.2 54.1 29.6 3.1 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 97 11.3 23.7 40.2 24.7 2.8 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 96 4.2 6.3 56.3 33.3 3.2 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 73 8.2 17.8 47.9 26.0 2.9 0.88 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 94 5.3 11.7 55.3 27.7 3.1 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 94 5.3 10.6 60.6 23.4 3.0 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 93 4.3 10.8 58.1 26.9 3.1 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 93 12.9 29.0 35.5 22.6 2.7 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 96 16.7 18.8 37.5 27.1 2.8 1.04 21. Overall quality of teaching 94 14.9 18.1 36.2 30.9 2.8 1.03. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 26 15.4 15.4 57.7 11.5 2.7 0.89 33. Amount of work appropriate 28 17.9 14.3 60.7 7.1 2.6 0.88 34. Instructor explained expectations 28 21.4 21.4 50.0 7.1 2.4 0.92 35. Instructor helped with my problems 27 14.8 14.8 59.3 11.1 2.7 0.88 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 28 17.9 25.0 50.0 7.1 2.5 0.88 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 4.2 0.60 38. Question 38 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 4.4 0.81 39. Question 39 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 4.2 0.75 40. Question 40 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 27.3 36.4 3.9 1.04 41. Question 41 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 4.6 . 42. Question 42 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 14.3 57.1 4.3 . 43. Question 43 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 4.3 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 108 Number of forms scanned = 99 Number of forms with at least one student response = 99 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 82 12.0 A 365 53.5 Sophomore 101 14.7 B 260 38.1 Junior 128 18.7 C 45 6.6 Senior 258 37.6 D 3 0.4 Graduate 113 16.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 3 0.4 Pass or Audit 9 1.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 227 33.2 Studies Program 119 17.4 2 hours 222 32.5 Required by my major 361 52.8 3 hours 130 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 204 29.8 4 - 5 hours 58 8.5 6 - 7 hours 26 3.8 8 or more hours 20 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 753 0.0 1.5 49.5 49.0 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 690 2.8 8.4 50.7 38.1 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 733 1.4 6.5 56.1 36.0 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 668 1.2 5.7 50.1 43.0 3.3 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 730 0.8 4.0 49.2 46.0 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 735 0.1 3.3 53.9 42.7 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 716 1.0 7.8 54.1 37.2 3.3 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 696 2.2 14.5 48.7 34.6 3.2 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 749 1.5 6.3 44.7 47.5 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 750 0.5 1.2 31.9 66.4 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 681 0.3 1.9 49.9 47.9 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 750 1.1 2.1 45.1 51.7 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 747 2.3 8.4 42.7 46.6 3.3 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 745 0.4 5.2 42.6 51.8 3.5 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 722 0.7 5.8 54.6 38.9 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 727 1.2 7.8 53.9 37.0 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 710 1.3 10.7 53.5 34.5 3.2 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 746 0.9 3.1 50.4 45.6 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 739 3.0 14.1 48.4 34.5 3.1 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 746 1.7 8.0 41.0 49.2 3.4 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 741 1.8 7.7 35.0 55.6 3.4 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 108 0.9 15.7 53.7 29.6 3.1 0.69 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 138 2.2 9.4 55.8 32.6 3.2 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 134 1.5 3.7 57.5 37.3 3.3 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 74 0.0 12.2 52.7 35.1 3.2 0.65 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 52 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 42 0.0 7.1 47.6 45.2 3.4 0.62 28. Guided student report preparation 39 2.6 7.7 41.0 48.7 3.4 0.74 29. Students free to express opinions 55 0.0 1.8 36.4 61.8 3.6 0.53 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 54 0.0 3.7 38.9 57.4 3.5 0.57 31. Developed abil to conduct research 35 0.0 22.9 42.9 34.3 3.1 0.76 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 7.1 0.0 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.83 33. Amount of work appropriate 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 34. Instructor explained expectations 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 35. Instructor helped with my problems 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1209 Number of forms scanned = 766 Number of forms with at least one student response = 756 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Human Env Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 25 11.1 A 191 85.7 Sophomore 33 14.7 B 28 12.6 Junior 48 21.3 C 1 0.4 Senior 104 46.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 15 6.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 1.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 140 62.8 Studies Program 15 6.7 2 hours 48 21.5 Required by my major 192 85.7 3 hours 25 11.2 Other (e.g. elective) 17 7.6 4 - 5 hours 6 2.7 6 - 7 hours 2 0.9 8 or more hours 2 0.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 246 0.8 1.6 52.0 45.5 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 139 6.5 14.4 46.8 32.4 3.1 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 240 2.9 9.2 60.0 27.9 3.1 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 108 3.7 7.4 54.6 34.3 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 244 0.8 1.6 44.7 52.9 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 248 1.2 3.2 49.2 46.4 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 247 1.2 3.2 45.7 49.8 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 237 2.5 17.3 43.9 36.3 3.1 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 247 2.4 10.5 51.0 36.0 3.2 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 246 2.4 6.1 50.4 41.1 3.3 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 213 0.9 5.6 57.3 36.2 3.3 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 245 1.2 4.1 55.5 39.2 3.3 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 243 7.8 23.0 43.6 25.5 2.9 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 247 1.2 2.8 56.3 39.7 3.3 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 235 1.7 9.4 62.1 26.8 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 236 4.2 14.0 55.1 26.7 3.0 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 229 4.8 18.3 53.7 23.1 3.0 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 245 2.4 8.2 63.3 26.1 3.1 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 240 10.0 29.6 45.4 15.0 2.7 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 246 13.4 26.0 37.0 23.6 2.7 0.98 21. Overall quality of teaching 243 1.2 14.8 44.4 39.5 3.2 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 50.0 37.5 12.5 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 2.6 0.81 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 299 Number of forms scanned = 249 Number of forms with at least one student response = 249 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 18 3.9 A 208 45.1 Sophomore 97 21.0 B 211 45.8 Junior 157 34.0 C 38 8.2 Senior 167 36.1 D 3 0.7 Graduate 20 4.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 0.6 Pass or Audit 1 0.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 84 18.3 Studies Program 42 9.1 2 hours 141 30.7 Required by my major 372 80.5 3 hours 100 21.7 Other (e.g. elective) 48 10.4 4 - 5 hours 60 13.0 6 - 7 hours 22 4.8 8 or more hours 53 11.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 507 2.6 4.7 54.2 38.5 3.3 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 497 3.4 8.7 50.1 37.8 3.2 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 490 2.2 8.2 57.6 32.0 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 473 4.0 14.0 51.4 30.7 3.1 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 502 5.2 14.3 51.4 29.1 3.0 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 499 4.6 12.4 52.9 30.1 3.1 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 502 9.0 11.2 45.2 34.7 3.1 0.90 8. Graded assignments included comments 472 5.9 25.4 43.4 25.2 2.9 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 507 5.9 14.4 48.9 30.8 3.0 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 506 1.6 5.3 45.1 48.0 3.4 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 442 2.9 9.0 53.8 34.2 3.2 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 503 4.8 10.5 48.5 36.2 3.2 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 503 8.2 18.5 43.9 29.4 2.9 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 503 4.0 11.7 49.9 34.4 3.1 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 440 1.8 12.3 57.3 28.6 3.1 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 481 2.3 12.7 59.3 25.8 3.1 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 437 3.7 15.6 55.8 24.9 3.0 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 502 2.0 6.2 56.2 35.7 3.3 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 492 6.1 25.8 43.1 25.0 2.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 506 5.5 15.6 48.6 30.2 3.0 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 505 9.5 15.8 39.0 35.6 3.0 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 21 4.8 28.6 38.1 28.6 2.9 0.89 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 29 0.0 0.0 69.0 31.0 3.3 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 28 7.1 7.1 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.81 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 27 3.7 0.0 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 656 Number of forms scanned = 509 Number of forms with at least one student response = 508 Percent completed = 77.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 1.7 A 247 53.7 Sophomore 76 16.2 B 168 36.5 Junior 137 29.3 C 39 8.5 Senior 231 49.4 D 3 0.7 Graduate 13 2.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 0.6 Pass or Audit 3 0.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 146 31.5 Studies Program 33 7.1 2 hours 148 31.9 Required by my major 382 81.8 3 hours 106 22.8 Other (e.g. elective) 52 11.1 4 - 5 hours 44 9.5 6 - 7 hours 14 3.0 8 or more hours 6 1.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 525 0.6 5.5 58.9 35.0 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 483 2.1 7.2 56.5 34.2 3.2 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 489 1.8 6.1 62.6 29.4 3.2 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 502 3.8 11.6 51.4 33.3 3.1 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 509 2.0 8.1 57.8 32.2 3.2 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 505 0.6 6.3 61.4 31.7 3.2 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 509 4.5 12.8 55.4 27.3 3.1 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 464 1.9 21.6 54.1 22.4 3.0 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 518 5.2 14.1 52.9 27.8 3.0 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 519 0.0 2.3 48.9 48.7 3.5 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 482 0.6 4.8 57.9 36.7 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 516 1.4 5.6 59.9 33.1 3.2 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 515 4.1 16.3 53.0 26.6 3.0 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 510 2.7 11.4 55.9 30.0 3.1 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 446 0.9 12.8 61.4 24.9 3.1 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 503 0.2 8.3 65.6 25.8 3.2 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 477 1.3 14.5 62.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 521 1.0 3.6 62.2 33.2 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 509 3.7 19.3 53.2 23.8 3.0 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 518 2.3 14.9 55.6 27.2 3.1 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 514 5.8 15.8 44.0 34.4 3.1 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 36 8.3 22.2 61.1 8.3 2.7 0.75 33. Amount of work appropriate 36 2.8 8.3 80.6 8.3 2.9 0.53 34. Instructor explained expectations 37 16.2 21.6 56.8 5.4 2.5 0.84 35. Instructor helped with my problems 37 18.9 37.8 40.5 2.7 2.3 0.80 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 36 13.9 11.1 61.1 13.9 2.8 0.87 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 789 Number of forms scanned = 532 Number of forms with at least one student response = 525 Percent completed = 66.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Diplomacy & International Commerc SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 69 87.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 12.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 80 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 3.8 Studies Program 29 36.7 2 hours 14 17.5 Required by my major 36 45.6 3 hours 22 27.5 Other (e.g. elective) 14 17.7 4 - 5 hours 26 32.5 6 - 7 hours 9 11.3 8 or more hours 6 7.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 82 1.2 3.7 50.0 45.1 3.4 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 3.3 10.0 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 79 1.3 5.1 57.0 36.7 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 3.3 6.7 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 76 0.0 6.6 52.6 40.8 3.3 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 81 2.5 1.2 49.4 46.9 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 75 0.0 0.0 45.3 54.7 3.5 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 74 0.0 5.4 50.0 44.6 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 84 2.4 8.3 47.6 41.7 3.3 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 85 1.2 2.4 31.8 64.7 3.6 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 77 0.0 1.3 37.7 61.0 3.6 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 84 4.8 4.8 45.2 45.2 3.3 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 83 4.8 8.4 51.8 34.9 3.2 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 85 3.5 2.4 48.2 45.9 3.4 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 79 1.3 2.5 58.2 38.0 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 84 0.0 6.0 46.4 47.6 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 83 1.2 10.8 45.8 42.2 3.3 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 84 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 82 2.4 8.5 56.1 32.9 3.2 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 85 7.1 9.4 48.2 35.3 3.1 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 79 6.3 7.6 43.0 43.0 3.2 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 50 0.0 0.0 34.0 66.0 3.7 0.48 28. Guided student report preparation 51 0.0 5.9 49.0 45.1 3.4 0.60 29. Students free to express opinions 51 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 51 0.0 0.0 45.1 54.9 3.5 0.50 31. Developed abil to conduct research 48 2.1 2.1 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.64 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 112 Number of forms scanned = 85 Number of forms with at least one student response = 85 Percent completed = 75.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Lexington Campus Graduate School SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 25.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 12.5 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 4 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 4 50.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Public Administration SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 155 68.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 68 30.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 1.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 222 97.4 E/Fail 1 0.4 Professional 2 0.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 35 15.5 Studies Program 9 4.0 2 hours 47 20.8 Required by my major 192 85.0 3 hours 66 29.2 Other (e.g. elective) 25 11.1 4 - 5 hours 48 21.2 6 - 7 hours 19 8.4 8 or more hours 11 4.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 248 0.4 1.2 39.5 58.9 3.6 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 243 3.7 11.5 43.2 41.6 3.2 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 248 2.0 4.8 50.8 42.3 3.3 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 205 2.4 5.9 43.9 47.8 3.4 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 239 2.1 6.3 40.6 51.0 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 246 2.4 4.1 45.1 48.4 3.4 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 245 0.4 4.5 43.7 51.4 3.5 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 229 2.6 11.8 45.9 39.7 3.2 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 246 2.4 14.2 45.1 38.2 3.2 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 248 0.8 1.6 27.0 70.6 3.7 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 223 1.8 4.9 42.2 51.1 3.4 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 247 1.2 4.9 42.9 51.0 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 246 3.3 13.0 39.8 43.9 3.2 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 246 2.4 6.9 40.7 50.0 3.4 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 209 1.9 6.2 53.1 38.8 3.3 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 246 1.6 7.7 47.2 43.5 3.3 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 241 2.1 9.1 51.5 37.3 3.2 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 246 2.0 5.3 48.0 44.7 3.4 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 242 5.4 21.1 43.8 29.8 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 246 2.8 13.8 34.1 49.2 3.3 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 245 2.4 13.1 32.7 51.8 3.3 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 29. Students free to express opinions 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 31. Developed abil to conduct research 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 298 Number of forms scanned = 248 Number of forms with at least one student response = 248 Percent completed = 83.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Military Science DEPARTMENT = ROTC SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 18.8 A 45 93.8 Sophomore 19 39.6 B 2 4.2 Junior 13 27.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 14.6 D 1 2.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 56.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 14.6 Required by my major 4 8.5 3 hours 10 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 43 91.5 4 - 5 hours 2 4.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 4.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 49 0.0 2.0 22.4 75.5 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 45 0.0 4.4 42.2 53.3 3.5 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 49 0.0 2.0 20.4 77.6 3.8 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 49 0.0 6.1 20.4 73.5 3.7 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 0.0 2.3 34.1 63.6 3.6 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 4.2 22.9 72.9 3.7 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 0.0 9.5 35.7 54.8 3.5 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 0.0 6.1 28.6 65.3 3.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 49 0.0 0.0 24.5 75.5 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 48 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 0.0 0.0 24.5 75.5 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 2.1 4.2 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 48 0.0 2.1 22.9 75.0 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 43 0.0 2.3 48.8 48.8 3.5 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 0.0 2.4 36.6 61.0 3.6 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 49 2.0 0.0 30.6 67.3 3.6 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 8.7 8.7 32.6 50.0 3.2 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 49 2.0 4.1 24.5 69.4 3.6 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 49 0.0 8.2 24.5 67.3 3.6 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 64 Number of forms scanned = 59 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 76.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 0.5 A 554 68.7 Sophomore 16 2.0 B 234 29.0 Junior 103 12.6 C 15 1.9 Senior 168 20.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 521 63.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 3 0.4 Pass or Audit 3 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 143 17.7 Studies Program 48 6.0 2 hours 170 21.0 Required by my major 695 86.3 3 hours 158 19.5 Other (e.g. elective) 62 7.7 4 - 5 hours 151 18.6 6 - 7 hours 60 7.4 8 or more hours 128 15.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 861 0.8 3.3 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 701 3.4 7.8 44.9 43.8 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 852 0.8 4.5 47.7 47.1 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 669 2.4 4.2 45.1 48.3 3.4 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 833 1.0 5.9 45.0 48.1 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 858 0.5 3.6 46.3 49.7 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 845 0.5 2.7 42.4 54.4 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 830 1.1 7.7 42.5 48.7 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 862 2.2 8.6 38.6 50.6 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 866 0.2 1.7 31.6 66.4 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 784 0.9 4.0 41.5 53.7 3.5 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 865 0.7 4.2 38.6 56.5 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 858 1.6 9.1 38.8 50.5 3.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 868 0.5 2.4 34.4 62.7 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 819 0.4 4.0 48.4 47.3 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 849 0.5 5.5 45.8 48.2 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 829 0.5 8.7 46.8 44.0 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 858 0.2 4.0 45.0 50.8 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 839 1.9 13.5 42.9 41.7 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 855 2.3 9.1 33.5 55.1 3.4 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 857 2.7 11.0 25.3 61.0 3.4 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 23 4.3 0.0 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 35 0.0 8.6 51.4 40.0 3.3 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 35 2.9 2.9 42.9 51.4 3.4 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 60 0.0 3.3 46.7 50.0 3.5 0.57 28. Guided student report preparation 69 0.0 10.1 49.3 40.6 3.3 0.65 29. Students free to express opinions 81 0.0 6.2 28.4 65.4 3.6 0.61 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 80 0.0 6.3 33.8 60.0 3.5 0.62 31. Developed abil to conduct research 58 0.0 6.9 46.6 46.6 3.4 0.62 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1041 Number of forms scanned = 922 Number of forms with at least one student response = 869 Percent completed = 83.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************