****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Diplomacy & International Commerc FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIP 777 001S2 RESEARCH PROBLEMS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DESCH, MICHAEL ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 94.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 5.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 19 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 10 52.6 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 9 47.4 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 26.3 6 - 7 hours 2 10.5 8 or more hours 1 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 4.8 9.5 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.83 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 10.0 0.0 60.0 30.0 3.1 0.85 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 10.5 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 21 4.8 4.8 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 14.3 52.4 33.3 3.2 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 9.5 9.5 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 10.5 5.3 47.4 36.8 3.1 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Diplomacy & International Commerc FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIP 795 004O1 SPECIAL PROBLEMS - DIP: GLOBALIZATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gholtz, E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 45.5 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 6 54.5 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 2 18.2 8 or more hours 3 27.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 8.3 25.0 33.3 33.3 2.9 1.00 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 8.3 0.0 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 16.7 8.3 41.7 33.3 2.9 1.08 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 16.7 16.7 25.0 41.7 2.9 1.16 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 16.7 8.3 33.3 41.7 3.0 1.13 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 25.0 8.3 33.3 33.3 2.8 1.22 14. Encouraged class participation 12 16.7 8.3 41.7 33.3 2.9 1.08 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 27.3 36.4 27.3 2.8 0.98 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 16.7 0.0 58.3 25.0 2.9 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 16.7 8.3 41.7 33.3 2.9 1.08 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 25.0 16.7 25.0 33.3 2.7 1.23. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Diplomacy & International Commerc FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DIP 777 001S3 RESEARCH PROBLEMS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pringle, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 90.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 10.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.0 Studies Program 10 50.0 2 hours 4 20.0 Required by my major 10 50.0 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 25.0 6 - 7 hours 2 10.0 8 or more hours 1 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Diplomacy & International Commerc FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIP 777 001S1 RESEARCH PROBLEMS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Stempel, John D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 94.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 5.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 19 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 9 47.4 2 hours 4 21.1 Required by my major 10 52.6 3 hours 6 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 6 31.6 6 - 7 hours 2 10.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 5.0 5.0 55.0 35.0 3.2 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 15.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 15.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Diplomacy & International Commerc FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIP 780 401L1 INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = TSUBOI, CLIFFORD ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 90.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 9.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 8 80.0 4 - 5 hours 6 54.5 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 3.7 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 3.7 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 10.0 0.0 0.0 90.0 3.7 0.95 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Lexington Campus Graduate School FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GS 600 001L1 SPEC TOP GRAD COURS: GREAT BOOKS WORLD POLITC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Desch, Michael ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 25.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 12.5 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 4 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 4 50.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************