UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Arts Administration COURSE = AAD course summary INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 25 80.6 Sophomore 4 12.9 B 6 19.4 Junior 8 25.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 19 61.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 2 6.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 1 - 3 hours 23 76.7 Required by my major 28 90.3 4 - 6 hours 5 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 9.7 7 - 10 hours 0 0.0 over 10 hours 0 0.0 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 8 25.8 1 - 3 times 22 71.0 4 - 6 times 1 3.2 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 33 0.0 3.0 42.4 54.5 3.5 0.57 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 33 0.0 0.0 24.2 75.8 3.8 0.44 3. Arrived for class on time 33 0.0 0.0 15.2 84.8 3.8 0.36 4. Used class time efficiently 33 0.0 3.0 39.4 57.6 3.5 0.56 5. Exhibited respect for students 33 0.0 3.0 15.2 81.8 3.8 0.48 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 33 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.45 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 33 0.0 0.0 24.2 75.8 3.8 0.44 8. Encouraged student participation 33 0.0 3.0 18.2 78.8 3.8 0.50 9. Assignments helped understanding 33 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 10. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.45 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 42.4 57.6 3.6 0.50 12. Available outside of class for help 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 13. Challenged me to think artistically 33 0.0 0.0 51.5 48.5 3.5 0.51 14. Stimulated interest in subject 33 0.0 3.0 36.4 60.6 3.6 0.56 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 32 0.0 0.0 59.4 40.6 3.4 0.50 16. I gained understanding in subject 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 17. I learned to respect differnt views 32 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 18. Challenged me to think artistically 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 32 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.62 20. Stimulated me to read further 32 0.0 15.6 34.4 50.0 3.3 0.75 21. Would recommend based on content 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Instr helped me develop goals 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 33 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-E course summary INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 79.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 20.6 Junior 16 47.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 17 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 4 11.8 Studies Program 1 2.9 1 - 3 hours 23 67.6 Required by my major 33 97.1 4 - 6 hours 5 14.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 7 - 10 hours 1 2.9 over 10 hours 1 2.9 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 15 44.1 1 - 3 times 18 52.9 4 - 6 times 1 2.9 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 37 0.0 0.0 29.7 70.3 3.7 0.46 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 37 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 3. Arrived for class on time 37 0.0 0.0 8.1 91.9 3.9 0.28 4. Used class time efficiently 37 0.0 5.4 16.2 78.4 3.7 0.56 5. Exhibited respect for students 37 0.0 2.7 21.6 75.7 3.7 0.51 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 37 0.0 0.0 45.9 54.1 3.5 0.51 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 37 0.0 2.7 27.0 70.3 3.7 0.53 8. Encouraged student participation 37 0.0 2.7 24.3 73.0 3.7 0.52 9. Assignments helped understanding 37 0.0 2.7 29.7 67.6 3.6 0.54 10. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 2.7 37.8 59.5 3.6 0.55 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 36 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 12. Available outside of class for help 37 0.0 0.0 24.3 75.7 3.8 0.43 13. Challenged me to think artistically 37 0.0 0.0 21.6 78.4 3.8 0.42 14. Stimulated interest in subject 37 0.0 10.8 27.0 62.2 3.5 0.69 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 34 0.0 8.8 44.1 47.1 3.4 0.65 16. I gained understanding in subject 37 0.0 2.7 43.2 54.1 3.5 0.56 17. I learned to respect differnt views 37 0.0 5.4 43.2 51.4 3.5 0.61 18. Challenged me to think artistically 37 0.0 5.4 32.4 62.2 3.6 0.60 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 37 0.0 2.7 35.1 62.2 3.6 0.55 20. Stimulated me to read further 37 2.7 27.0 24.3 45.9 3.1 0.92 21. Would recommend based on content 37 0.0 16.2 32.4 51.4 3.4 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 28 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.63 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 24. Instr helped me develop goals 27 0.0 7.4 37.0 55.6 3.5 0.64 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 37 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-H course summary INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 5.2 A 67 39.2 Sophomore 29 16.7 B 70 40.9 Junior 50 28.7 C 28 16.4 Senior 75 43.1 D 5 2.9 Graduate 9 5.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.6 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.6 Pass or Audit 1 0.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 24 13.9 Studies Program 35 20.3 1 - 3 hours 88 50.9 Required by my major 108 62.8 4 - 6 hours 47 27.2 Other (e.g. elective) 29 16.9 7 - 10 hours 13 7.5 over 10 hours 1 0.6 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 40 23.1 1 - 3 times 110 63.6 4 - 6 times 21 12.1 7 - 9 times 1 0.6 over 9 times 1 0.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 178 1.1 10.1 53.9 34.8 3.2 0.67 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 180 0.0 0.6 27.2 72.2 3.7 0.46 3. Arrived for class on time 183 0.5 2.7 33.3 63.4 3.6 0.57 4. Used class time efficiently 177 0.0 7.3 46.3 46.3 3.4 0.62 5. Exhibited respect for students 181 2.2 6.6 39.2 51.9 3.4 0.71 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 179 2.2 8.9 48.6 40.2 3.3 0.72 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 180 0.6 3.9 50.0 45.6 3.4 0.60 8. Encouraged student participation 177 1.7 14.1 49.2 35.0 3.2 0.73 9. Assignments helped understanding 151 2.0 9.9 51.0 37.1 3.2 0.71 10. Grading was fair and consistent 172 1.7 11.6 47.7 39.0 3.2 0.72 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 175 0.0 8.6 50.3 41.1 3.3 0.63 12. Available outside of class for help 161 0.6 2.5 50.3 46.6 3.4 0.58 13. Challenged me to think artistically 180 0.6 6.1 42.8 50.6 3.4 0.64 14. Stimulated interest in subject 181 2.2 13.3 40.3 44.2 3.3 0.77 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 153 2.0 22.9 52.9 22.2 3.0 0.73 16. I gained understanding in subject 179 0.6 6.1 51.4 41.9 3.3 0.62 17. I learned to respect differnt views 164 0.6 7.3 61.0 31.1 3.2 0.60 18. Challenged me to think artistically 177 0.6 2.8 54.2 42.4 3.4 0.57 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 174 0.6 9.8 48.3 41.4 3.3 0.67 20. Stimulated me to read further 176 2.3 18.2 50.6 29.0 3.1 0.75 21. Would recommend based on content 178 2.8 15.7 45.5 36.0 3.1 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 42 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.70 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 31 0.0 9.7 54.8 35.5 3.3 0.63 24. Instr helped me develop goals 33 0.0 21.2 51.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 28. Instr comments were pertinent 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 196 Number of forms scanned = 196 Number of forms with at least one student response = 184 Percent completed = 93.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Art COURSE = A-S course summary INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 23 6.7 A 207 62.3 Sophomore 36 10.5 B 101 30.4 Junior 90 26.2 C 15 4.5 Senior 171 49.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 15 4.4 E/Fail 1 0.3 Professional 1 0.3 I 1 0.3 Other 7 2.0 Pass or Audit 7 2.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 24 7.1 Studies Program 11 3.3 1 - 3 hours 114 33.6 Required by my major 230 68.2 4 - 6 hours 89 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 96 28.5 7 - 10 hours 55 16.2 over 10 hours 57 16.8 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 86 25.4 1 - 3 times 226 66.7 4 - 6 times 25 7.4 7 - 9 times 2 0.6 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 371 0.8 5.4 39.9 53.9 3.5 0.64 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 373 0.0 0.8 25.5 73.7 3.7 0.46 3. Arrived for class on time 374 0.8 4.8 28.1 66.3 3.6 0.62 4. Used class time efficiently 374 1.3 7.5 36.1 55.1 3.4 0.69 5. Exhibited respect for students 373 1.1 4.0 32.4 62.5 3.6 0.63 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 362 1.4 9.9 35.4 53.3 3.4 0.72 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 373 1.3 5.9 36.2 56.6 3.5 0.67 8. Encouraged student participation 369 0.3 2.4 31.4 65.9 3.6 0.55 9. Assignments helped understanding 370 0.5 4.9 34.3 60.3 3.5 0.62 10. Grading was fair and consistent 357 1.4 6.4 35.6 56.6 3.5 0.68 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 323 2.8 3.4 40.6 53.3 3.4 0.70 12. Available outside of class for help 339 0.0 5.0 38.1 56.9 3.5 0.59 13. Challenged me to think artistically 372 1.3 3.0 31.7 64.0 3.6 0.62 14. Stimulated interest in subject 372 2.7 4.3 30.1 62.9 3.5 0.71 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 345 1.7 8.1 37.1 53.0 3.4 0.71 16. I gained understanding in subject 373 1.3 4.6 38.3 55.8 3.5 0.65 17. I learned to respect differnt views 356 0.3 7.3 38.8 53.7 3.5 0.64 18. Challenged me to think artistically 368 0.8 2.4 34.2 62.5 3.6 0.58 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 369 1.6 4.1 32.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 20. Stimulated me to read further 356 2.2 11.2 36.5 50.0 3.3 0.77 21. Would recommend based on content 366 2.2 6.8 35.0 56.0 3.4 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 353 2.8 5.9 30.3 60.9 3.5 0.74 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 348 1.4 7.5 32.2 58.9 3.5 0.70 24. Instr helped me develop goals 342 1.8 11.7 34.2 52.3 3.4 0.76 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 348 2.3 5.7 32.5 59.5 3.5 0.71 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 38 5.3 2.6 26.3 65.8 3.5 0.80 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 32 0.0 3.1 31.3 65.6 3.6 0.55 28. Instr comments were pertinent 34 2.9 0.0 26.5 70.6 3.6 0.65 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 Number of forms preslugged = at least 390 Number of forms scanned = 390 Number of forms with at least one student response = 378 Percent completed = 96.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Music COURSE = MUC course summary INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 181 35.2 A 449 87.7 Sophomore 126 24.5 B 49 9.6 Junior 88 17.1 C 7 1.4 Senior 99 19.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 17 3.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 0.6 Pass or Audit 7 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 164 31.7 Studies Program 7 1.3 1 - 3 hours 213 41.1 Required by my major 300 57.7 4 - 6 hours 77 14.9 Other (e.g. elective) 213 41.0 7 - 10 hours 34 6.6 over 10 hours 30 5.8 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 290 55.6 1 - 3 times 221 42.3 4 - 6 times 11 2.1 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 547 0.7 4.2 35.3 59.8 3.5 0.61 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 551 0.5 0.9 28.9 69.7 3.7 0.52 3. Arrived for class on time 550 1.1 2.9 34.5 61.5 3.6 0.61 4. Used class time efficiently 551 1.5 5.3 34.7 58.6 3.5 0.67 5. Exhibited respect for students 548 2.2 7.3 31.9 58.6 3.5 0.73 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 430 0.7 3.5 32.6 63.3 3.6 0.60 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 534 0.9 3.6 33.1 62.4 3.6 0.61 8. Encouraged student participation 527 0.8 1.9 27.7 69.6 3.7 0.55 9. Assignments helped understanding 359 1.4 2.5 33.1 63.0 3.6 0.62 10. Grading was fair and consistent 484 0.4 2.3 30.6 66.7 3.6 0.55 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 299 0.3 2.0 32.1 65.6 3.6 0.54 12. Available outside of class for help 518 1.2 1.9 38.8 58.1 3.5 0.60 13. Challenged me to think artistically 537 1.1 4.8 32.6 61.5 3.5 0.64 14. Stimulated interest in subject 542 2.6 7.0 31.7 58.7 3.5 0.74 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 455 2.0 10.1 36.5 51.4 3.4 0.75 16. I gained understanding in subject 517 1.0 3.3 38.9 56.9 3.5 0.61 17. I learned to respect differnt views 491 1.2 4.7 41.1 53.0 3.5 0.65 18. Challenged me to think artistically 517 1.5 5.2 35.8 57.4 3.5 0.67 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 518 1.7 4.6 38.6 55.0 3.5 0.67 20. Stimulated me to read further 480 4.8 14.0 33.3 47.9 3.2 0.87 21. Would recommend based on content 512 3.9 5.9 37.5 52.7 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 198 1.5 2.5 31.3 64.6 3.6 0.62 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 191 3.1 5.2 35.1 56.5 3.5 0.74 24. Instr helped me develop goals 186 3.2 5.9 36.6 54.3 3.4 0.75 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 171 1.2 5.3 33.3 60.2 3.5 0.65 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 410 1.5 5.9 31.2 61.5 3.5 0.67 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 409 1.2 2.0 33.0 63.8 3.6 0.60 28. Instr comments were pertinent 410 2.2 4.9 32.9 60.0 3.5 0.69 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 406 3.7 7.4 35.2 53.7 3.4 0.78 Number of forms preslugged = at least 556 Number of forms scanned = 556 Number of forms with at least one student response = 555 Percent completed = 99.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Music COURSE = MUP course summary INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 67 28.5 A 185 79.7 Sophomore 48 20.4 B 41 17.7 Junior 38 16.2 C 2 0.9 Senior 41 17.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 37 15.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 0.4 Other 4 1.7 Pass or Audit 3 1.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 2 0.8 Studies Program 4 1.7 1 - 3 hours 40 16.6 Required by my major 209 86.7 4 - 6 hours 65 27.0 Other (e.g. elective) 28 11.6 7 - 10 hours 50 20.7 over 10 hours 84 34.9 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 135 56.3 1 - 3 times 102 42.5 4 - 6 times 2 0.8 7 - 9 times 0 0.0 over 9 times 1 0.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 253 0.8 1.6 22.5 75.1 3.7 0.53 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 253 0.0 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.9 0.30 3. Arrived for class on time 251 2.0 7.6 25.5 64.9 3.5 0.72 4. Used class time efficiently 254 1.6 4.3 25.2 68.9 3.6 0.65 5. Exhibited respect for students 251 1.2 1.2 21.1 76.5 3.7 0.54 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 223 0.9 2.2 17.9 78.9 3.7 0.54 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 250 0.8 0.4 22.8 76.0 3.7 0.50 8. Encouraged student participation 241 0.8 0.4 15.4 83.4 3.8 0.46 9. Assignments helped understanding 207 1.0 1.0 19.3 78.7 3.8 0.51 10. Grading was fair and consistent 223 0.9 1.3 20.6 77.1 3.7 0.52 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 123 0.8 0.0 16.3 82.9 3.8 0.45 12. Available outside of class for help 244 1.6 2.5 23.8 72.1 3.7 0.61 13. Challenged me to think artistically 251 0.8 0.8 14.3 84.1 3.8 0.46 14. Stimulated interest in subject 250 1.2 1.2 20.8 76.8 3.7 0.54 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 218 1.8 0.9 28.9 68.3 3.6 0.60 16. I gained understanding in subject 239 1.7 0.4 24.7 73.2 3.7 0.57 17. I learned to respect differnt views 226 1.3 0.9 27.4 70.4 3.7 0.57 18. Challenged me to think artistically 239 1.3 0.8 16.7 81.2 3.8 0.52 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 237 1.3 1.3 18.1 79.3 3.8 0.54 20. Stimulated me to read further 228 1.3 4.4 25.4 68.9 3.6 0.64 21. Would recommend based on content 223 1.8 0.9 20.6 76.7 3.7 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 231 2.2 0.9 21.2 75.8 3.7 0.60 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 230 2.6 3.0 18.3 76.1 3.7 0.66 24. Instr helped me develop goals 230 2.2 3.5 20.9 73.5 3.7 0.65 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 226 2.7 0.9 22.6 73.9 3.7 0.63 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 49 0.0 0.0 24.5 75.5 3.8 0.43 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 49 0.0 0.0 16.3 83.7 3.8 0.37 28. Instr comments were pertinent 49 0.0 0.0 24.5 75.5 3.8 0.43 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 48 0.0 0.0 27.1 72.9 3.7 0.45 Number of forms preslugged = at least 256 Number of forms scanned = 256 Number of forms with at least one student response = 254 Percent completed = 99.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Music COURSE = MUS course summary INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 161 17.1 A 568 61.3 Sophomore 206 21.8 B 274 29.6 Junior 227 24.1 C 64 6.9 Senior 239 25.3 D 6 0.6 Graduate 98 10.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 10 1.1 Pass or Audit 15 1.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 242 25.6 Studies Program 245 26.2 1 - 3 hours 522 55.3 Required by my major 548 58.7 4 - 6 hours 142 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 141 15.1 7 - 10 hours 27 2.9 over 10 hours 11 1.2 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 208 22.1 1 - 3 times 593 63.0 4 - 6 times 112 11.9 7 - 9 times 14 1.5 over 9 times 14 1.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 975 1.6 6.9 35.1 56.4 3.5 0.70 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 974 0.2 1.1 21.3 77.4 3.8 0.47 3. Arrived for class on time 975 0.4 2.4 24.9 72.3 3.7 0.53 4. Used class time efficiently 977 1.8 6.2 33.2 58.8 3.5 0.70 5. Exhibited respect for students 972 0.1 1.5 28.7 69.7 3.7 0.51 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 973 2.4 5.1 33.0 59.5 3.5 0.70 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 974 1.1 3.9 32.4 62.5 3.6 0.63 8. Encouraged student participation 965 0.2 5.4 33.1 61.3 3.6 0.61 9. Assignments helped understanding 965 1.6 6.7 37.5 54.2 3.4 0.69 10. Grading was fair and consistent 962 1.0 3.3 35.2 60.4 3.5 0.61 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 958 1.1 5.9 35.3 57.6 3.5 0.66 12. Available outside of class for help 883 0.3 3.2 39.0 57.5 3.5 0.58 13. Challenged me to think artistically 963 2.1 6.9 35.4 55.7 3.4 0.71 14. Stimulated interest in subject 967 3.2 11.3 33.2 52.3 3.3 0.80 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 807 2.7 19.0 39.7 38.7 3.1 0.82 16. I gained understanding in subject 967 1.3 4.2 43.2 51.2 3.4 0.64 17. I learned to respect differnt views 867 1.0 7.3 48.0 43.7 3.3 0.66 18. Challenged me to think artistically 943 1.7 7.1 39.6 51.6 3.4 0.70 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 932 1.4 7.1 44.7 46.8 3.4 0.68 20. Stimulated me to read further 943 4.7 19.9 37.8 37.6 3.1 0.87 21. Would recommend based on content 945 5.2 9.7 38.4 46.7 3.3 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 197 2.0 6.6 42.6 48.7 3.4 0.70 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 173 2.3 6.9 43.9 46.8 3.4 0.71 24. Instr helped me develop goals 163 3.1 13.5 45.4 38.0 3.2 0.78 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 138 1.4 8.0 44.2 46.4 3.4 0.69 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 84 1.2 7.1 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.68 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 78 1.3 10.3 38.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 28. Instr comments were pertinent 80 2.5 5.0 41.3 51.3 3.4 0.71 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 69 0.0 5.8 44.9 49.3 3.4 0.61 Number of forms preslugged = at least 1007 Number of forms scanned = 1007 Number of forms with at least one student response = 983 Percent completed = 97.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS - Fine Arts COLLEGE = Fine Arts DEPARTMENT = Theatre COURSE = TA course summary INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = ------------------------------------------------------ SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 78 16.6 A 335 72.8 Sophomore 109 23.2 B 95 20.7 Junior 129 27.4 C 23 5.0 Senior 134 28.5 D 3 0.7 Graduate 16 3.4 E/Fail 2 0.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 0.9 Pass or Audit 2 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University less than 1 hour 141 30.0 Studies Program 141 30.3 1 - 3 hours 228 48.5 Required by my major 226 48.6 4 - 6 hours 74 15.7 Other (e.g. elective) 98 21.1 7 - 10 hours 11 2.3 over 10 hours 16 3.4 Number of times absent Number Percent 0 times 109 23.4 1 - 3 times 309 66.3 4 - 6 times 40 8.6 7 - 9 times 5 1.1 over 9 times 3 0.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 1. Presentd course material effectively 497 0.8 2.6 44.3 52.3 3.5 0.59 2. Had good knowledge of subject matter 499 0.4 1.6 29.5 68.5 3.7 0.53 3. Arrived for class on time 498 0.4 0.6 27.3 71.7 3.7 0.50 4. Used class time efficiently 499 1.0 3.6 39.1 56.3 3.5 0.62 5. Exhibited respect for students 498 1.0 2.8 30.7 65.5 3.6 0.60 6. Made expectations clear (assgn/test) 498 1.4 6.0 39.6 53.0 3.4 0.67 7. Satisfactorily answered questions 495 0.6 3.0 36.4 60.0 3.6 0.59 8. Encouraged student participation 495 0.6 1.6 31.9 65.9 3.6 0.55 9. Assignments helped understanding 498 1.2 4.6 40.8 53.4 3.5 0.64 10. Grading was fair and consistent 497 1.8 5.8 34.0 58.4 3.5 0.69 11. Graded assignmnts returned promptly 497 0.6 2.6 44.7 52.1 3.5 0.58 12. Available outside of class for help 450 0.9 3.6 43.1 52.4 3.5 0.61 13. Challenged me to think artistically 494 1.6 5.7 39.1 53.6 3.4 0.68 14. Stimulated interest in subject 490 1.6 9.4 36.9 52.0 3.4 0.72 SECTION C - COURSE ITEMS 15. Helped me develop problem solving 439 2.7 21.9 39.6 35.8 3.1 0.82 16. I gained understanding in subject 487 0.6 2.7 49.7 47.0 3.4 0.58 17. I learned to respect differnt views 462 0.9 6.3 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.64 18. Challenged me to think artistically 486 1.2 5.8 41.8 51.2 3.4 0.66 19. Exposed me to diverse approaches 484 1.2 4.1 45.7 49.0 3.4 0.63 20. Stimulated me to read further 477 4.6 21.0 37.7 36.7 3.1 0.87 21. Would recommend based on content 489 2.7 8.8 42.1 46.4 3.3 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION D - STUDIO COURSES (Music,Art,Theatre) ONLY 22. Instr inspired maximum effort 299 1.0 9.4 40.1 49.5 3.4 0.70 23. Instr evaluatd my artistic progress 293 1.7 4.8 46.1 47.4 3.4 0.66 24. Instr helped me develop goals 277 4.3 11.9 45.1 38.6 3.2 0.81 25. Studio-atmosphere of mutual support 273 1.8 5.9 43.6 48.7 3.4 0.68 SECTION E - SMALL/LARGE MUSIC ENSEMBLES ONLY 26. Instr inspired maximum effort 64 1.6 12.5 45.3 40.6 3.3 0.73 27. Instr made improvement suggestions 50 2.0 18.0 48.0 32.0 3.1 0.76 28. Instr comments were pertinent 51 3.9 11.8 43.1 41.2 3.2 0.81 29. Rehearsal-atmosphere of support 49 0.0 14.3 53.1 32.7 3.2 0.67 Number of forms preslugged = at least 503 Number of forms scanned = 503 Number of forms with at least one student response = 499 Percent completed = 99.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Institutional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************