****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 006L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fryar, Alan E. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 17.6 A 8 47.1 Sophomore 4 23.5 B 8 47.1 Junior 7 41.2 C 1 5.9 Senior 3 17.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 29.4 Studies Program 16 94.1 2 hours 11 64.7 Required by my major 1 5.9 3 hours 1 5.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 10.0 60.0 25.0 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 25.0 65.0 10.0 2.9 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 15.0 65.0 20.0 3.1 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 47.1 35.3 17.6 2.7 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 30.0 55.0 15.0 2.9 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 45.0 30.0 20.0 2.7 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 26.3 31.6 42.1 3.2 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 007L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fryar, Alan E. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 29.6 A 10 37.0 Sophomore 9 33.3 B 14 51.9 Junior 6 22.2 C 3 11.1 Senior 4 14.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 44.4 Studies Program 17 63.0 2 hours 14 51.9 Required by my major 4 14.8 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 22.2 4 - 5 hours 1 3.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 3.6 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 14.3 14.3 46.4 25.0 2.8 0.98 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 7.1 7.1 39.3 46.4 3.3 0.89 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 3.6 3.6 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 7.1 10.7 50.0 32.1 3.1 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 3.6 0.0 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 7.7 42.3 34.6 15.4 2.6 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 3.6 3.6 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 3.6 35.7 60.7 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 10.7 35.7 35.7 17.9 2.6 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 28 7.1 17.9 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 29.2 58.3 8.3 2.7 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 7.4 18.5 63.0 11.1 2.8 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 3.6 3.6 75.0 17.9 3.1 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 16.0 40.0 36.0 8.0 2.4 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 10.7 14.3 53.6 21.4 2.9 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 3.6 14.3 42.9 39.3 3.2 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 96.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 008L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fryar, Alan E. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 16.7 A 11 57.9 Sophomore 8 44.4 B 7 36.8 Junior 5 27.8 C 1 5.3 Senior 2 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 31.6 Studies Program 15 83.3 2 hours 12 63.2 Required by my major 3 16.7 3 hours 1 5.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 13.6 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 3.0 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 9.1 45.5 40.9 3.2 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 9.5 23.8 38.1 28.6 2.9 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 9.1 45.5 40.9 3.2 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 10.0 55.0 30.0 3.1 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 4.8 9.5 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 20.0 45.0 30.0 3.0 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 9.5 33.3 33.3 23.8 2.7 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 4.5 18.2 45.5 31.8 3.0 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 4.5 9.1 45.5 40.9 3.2 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 5.9 17.6 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GLY 130 401L1 DINOSAURS & DISASTERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Greb, Stephen F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 27.3 A 18 40.0 Sophomore 10 22.7 B 19 42.2 Junior 11 25.0 C 7 15.6 Senior 10 22.7 D 1 2.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 46.7 Studies Program 29 64.4 2 hours 11 24.4 Required by my major 4 8.9 3 hours 11 24.4 Other (e.g. elective) 12 26.7 4 - 5 hours 1 2.2 6 - 7 hours 1 2.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 1.9 0.0 46.2 51.9 3.5 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 51 2.0 15.7 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 45 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 3.8 1.9 51.9 42.3 3.3 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 1.9 7.7 57.7 32.7 3.2 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 49 4.1 10.2 46.9 38.8 3.2 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 51 2.0 0.0 51.0 47.1 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 44 2.3 22.7 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 3.8 7.7 55.8 32.7 3.2 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 1.9 0.0 36.5 61.5 3.6 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 47 2.1 10.6 61.7 25.5 3.1 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 50 2.0 4.0 52.0 42.0 3.3 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 51 3.9 5.9 51.0 39.2 3.3 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 51 2.0 9.8 62.7 25.5 3.1 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 4.8 59.5 35.7 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 48 2.1 4.2 64.6 29.2 3.2 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 10.3 61.5 28.2 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 49 0.0 4.1 59.2 36.7 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 49 2.0 22.4 49.0 26.5 3.0 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 51 5.9 9.8 47.1 37.3 3.2 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 51 3.9 5.9 45.1 45.1 3.3 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 31 0.0 0.0 67.7 32.3 3.3 0.48 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 29 3.4 13.8 48.3 34.5 3.1 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 29 3.4 10.3 55.2 31.0 3.1 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 187 Number of forms scanned = 52 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 27.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GLY 110 001L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Henke, Kevin R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 37.5 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 3 18.8 B 11 68.8 Junior 4 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 18.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 43.8 Studies Program 12 75.0 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 3 18.8 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 38.9 50.0 11.1 2.7 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 27.8 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 35.3 29.4 29.4 2.8 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 16.7 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GLY 110 002L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Henke, Kevin R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 54.5 A 2 9.1 Sophomore 2 9.1 B 13 59.1 Junior 5 22.7 C 7 31.8 Senior 3 13.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 31.8 Studies Program 17 73.9 2 hours 9 40.9 Required by my major 4 17.4 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.7 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 87.5 8.3 3.0 0.36 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 8.7 17.4 56.5 17.4 2.8 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 26.1 60.9 8.7 2.7 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 8.0 80.0 8.0 2.9 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 84.0 16.0 3.2 0.37 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 70.8 29.2 3.3 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 31.6 52.6 10.5 2.7 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 12.0 60.0 24.0 3.0 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 34.8 47.8 13.0 2.7 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 19 15.8 10.5 57.9 15.8 2.7 0.93 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 5.6 5.6 72.2 16.7 3.0 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 17.4 69.6 8.7 2.8 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 22.7 59.1 13.6 2.8 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 4.0 8.0 80.0 8.0 2.9 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 25.0 54.2 4.2 2.5 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 16.0 12.0 64.0 8.0 2.6 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 4.0 20.0 48.0 28.0 3.0 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 96.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GLY 110 003L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Henke, Kevin R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 33.3 A 4 22.2 Sophomore 6 33.3 B 10 55.6 Junior 2 11.1 C 4 22.2 Senior 4 22.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 44.4 Studies Program 16 88.9 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 20.8 70.8 8.3 2.9 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 4.5 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 12.5 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 4.2 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 82.6 13.0 3.1 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 27.3 59.1 9.1 2.7 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 23 8.7 21.7 56.5 13.0 2.7 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 13.6 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 13.0 78.3 4.3 2.8 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 17.4 69.6 8.7 2.8 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 25.0 54.2 4.2 2.5 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 25.0 70.8 4.2 2.8 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 0.0 94.4 5.6 3.1 0.24 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 16.7 77.8 5.6 2.9 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 20.0 73.3 6.7 2.9 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GLY 530 001L1 LOW TEMPERATURE GEOCHEM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Henke, Kevin R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 88.9 Sophomore 1 5.6 B 2 11.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 61.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 22.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 16.7 Required by my major 8 44.4 3 hours 8 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 10 55.6 4 - 5 hours 3 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 42.1 21.1 36.8 2.9 0.91 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GLY 570 001S1 SEM IN GEOLOGICAL SCI: TEACHING GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Henke, Kevin R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 100.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 001L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 52.9 Sophomore 1 5.9 B 7 41.2 Junior 4 23.5 C 1 5.9 Senior 10 58.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 11.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 12.5 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 6 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 2 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 29.4 17.6 35.3 17.6 2.4 1.12 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 23.5 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 5.9 23.5 47.1 23.5 2.9 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 17.6 11.8 52.9 17.6 2.7 0.99 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 31.3 31.3 31.3 6.3 2.1 0.96 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 17.6 0.0 64.7 17.6 2.8 0.95 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 87.5 6.3 6.3 0.0 1.2 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 33.3 26.7 26.7 13.3 2.2 1.08 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 11.8 23.5 41.2 23.5 2.8 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 14 7.1 7.1 35.7 50.0 3.3 0.91 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 11.8 11.8 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.93 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 17.6 11.8 35.3 35.3 2.9 1.11 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 6.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 7.7 30.8 38.5 23.1 2.8 0.93 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 11.8 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.86 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 17.6 23.5 23.5 35.3 2.8 1.15 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 11.8 35.3 41.2 11.8 2.5 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 35.3 11.8 35.3 17.6 2.4 1.17. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 002L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 55.6 Junior 4 44.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 9 100.0 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 50.0 20.0 30.0 0.0 1.8 0.92 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 11.1 55.6 33.3 0.0 2.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 20.0 30.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 44.4 22.2 33.3 0.0 1.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 42.9 0.0 42.9 14.3 2.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.00 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 55.6 22.2 22.2 0.0 1.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 50.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 1.9 1.10 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 1.03 11. Was available for consultation 7 42.9 14.3 42.9 0.0 2.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 30.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 2.0 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 50.0 40.0 10.0 0.0 1.6 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 10 50.0 10.0 40.0 0.0 1.9 0.99 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 57.1 14.3 28.6 0.0 1.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 33.3 22.2 44.4 0.0 2.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 33.3 11.1 55.6 0.0 2.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 22.2 22.2 55.6 0.0 2.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 55.6 44.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 60.0 10.0 30.0 0.0 1.7 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 80.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 1.3 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 52.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 450G001L1 SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 4 80.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 20.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 45.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 230 001A1 FUNDAMENTALS GEOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.7 A 9 60.0 Sophomore 2 13.3 B 6 40.0 Junior 4 26.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 53.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 14 93.3 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 10.5 63.2 21.1 3.0 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 21.1 31.6 47.4 3.3 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 26.3 36.8 31.6 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 21.1 42.1 36.8 3.2 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 461 001L1 IGNEOUS/METAMORPH PETROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 2 40.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 3 60.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 220 001L1 PRIN OF PHYSICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 13.6 A 8 36.4 Sophomore 7 31.8 B 11 50.0 Junior 7 31.8 C 2 9.1 Senior 3 13.6 D 1 4.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 36.4 Studies Program 5 22.7 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 16 72.7 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.5 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 2 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 55.6 33.3 11.1 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 12.5 58.3 29.2 3.2 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 3.2 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 25.0 54.2 20.8 3.0 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 20 5.0 40.0 50.0 5.0 2.6 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 79.2 16.7 3.1 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 20.0 65.0 15.0 3.0 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 33.3 45.8 16.7 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 12.5 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 8.3 50.0 37.5 3.2 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 18.2 18.2 27.3 36.4 2.8 1.17 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 11 9.1 18.2 36.4 36.4 3.0 1.00 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 220 002L1 PRIN OF PHYSICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 47.6 Sophomore 2 9.5 B 11 52.4 Junior 12 57.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 47.6 Studies Program 2 9.5 2 hours 5 23.8 Required by my major 17 81.0 3 hours 3 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 4 - 5 hours 3 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 19.0 52.4 28.6 3.1 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 77.3 18.2 3.1 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 5.9 23.5 52.9 17.6 2.8 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 22.7 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 9.5 28.6 42.9 19.0 2.7 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 27.3 50.0 22.7 3.0 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 77.3 18.2 3.1 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 38.1 52.4 9.5 2.7 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 40.9 45.5 13.6 2.7 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 31.8 45.5 22.7 2.9 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 220 003L1 PRIN OF PHYSICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 13.3 A 3 20.0 Sophomore 3 20.0 B 9 60.0 Junior 4 26.7 C 3 20.0 Senior 6 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 53.3 Studies Program 4 26.7 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 10 66.7 3 hours 1 6.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 93.3 6.7 3.1 0.26 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 92.9 7.1 3.1 0.27 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 50.0 42.9 0.0 2.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 3.0 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 14 7.1 28.6 64.3 0.0 2.6 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 50.0 42.9 0.0 2.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.41 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 53.3 40.0 0.0 2.3 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 20.0 73.3 6.7 2.9 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 93.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 624 001L1 ADVANCED STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 3 60.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 120 001L1 SUSTAINABLE PLANET:THE GLY OF NAT RESOURCES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rast, Nicholas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 26.5 A 18 52.9 Sophomore 14 41.2 B 13 38.2 Junior 9 26.5 C 3 8.8 Senior 2 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 38.2 Studies Program 30 88.2 2 hours 10 29.4 Required by my major 2 5.9 3 hours 9 26.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 5.3 7.9 55.3 31.6 3.1 0.78 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 7.9 31.6 42.1 18.4 2.7 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 13.2 23.7 39.5 23.7 2.7 0.98 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 5.4 21.6 40.5 32.4 3.0 0.88 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 15.8 50.0 34.2 3.2 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 2.6 57.9 39.5 3.4 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 13.9 33.3 33.3 19.4 2.6 0.97 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 18.4 28.9 39.5 13.2 2.5 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 2.6 39.5 57.9 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 27 7.4 0.0 63.0 29.6 3.1 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 11.1 19.4 47.2 22.2 2.8 0.92 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 28.9 34.2 23.7 13.2 2.2 1.02 14. Encouraged class participation 36 11.1 38.9 36.1 13.9 2.5 0.88 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 7.7 30.8 42.3 19.2 2.7 0.87 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 9.4 37.5 37.5 15.6 2.6 0.87 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 10.3 51.7 17.2 20.7 2.5 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 8.1 24.3 43.2 24.3 2.8 0.90 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 27.8 47.2 11.1 13.9 2.1 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 28.9 26.3 34.2 10.5 2.3 1.00 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 23.7 34.2 28.9 13.2 2.3 0.99. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 30 10.0 36.7 40.0 13.3 2.6 0.86 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 29 13.8 31.0 48.3 6.9 2.5 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 29 17.2 20.7 44.8 17.2 2.6 0.98 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 18.2 36.4 36.4 9.1 2.4 0.92 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 116 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 32.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************