****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 466 001L1 MOD AMER HIS FROM WWI TO PEARL HARBOR, 1917-1941 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Campbell, Tracy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 36.7 Sophomore 2 6.7 B 18 60.0 Junior 7 23.3 C 1 3.3 Senior 20 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.3 Studies Program 1 3.3 2 hours 11 36.7 Required by my major 19 63.3 3 hours 14 46.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 33.3 4 - 5 hours 3 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 3.2 3.2 45.2 48.4 3.4 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 3.3 60.0 36.7 3.3 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 0.0 64.5 35.5 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 3.2 0.0 41.9 54.8 3.5 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 6.5 6.5 35.5 51.6 3.3 0.87 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 3.3 46.7 50.0 3.5 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 6.5 9.7 45.2 38.7 3.2 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 3.2 25.8 71.0 3.7 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 3.2 0.0 35.5 61.3 3.5 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 3.2 32.3 64.5 3.6 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 3.2 48.4 48.4 3.5 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 0.0 60.7 39.3 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 3.2 41.9 54.8 3.5 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 3.2 0.0 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 3.2 3.2 19.4 74.2 3.6 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 3.2 6.5 12.9 77.4 3.6 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 60.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 471 001O1 HONORS SEM HIS RESEARCH: TBA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Campbell, Tracy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 9.1 Junior 2 18.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 72.7 D 1 9.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 9.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 54.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 36.4 4 - 5 hours 5 45.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 6 54.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 206 001L1 HIS OF COLONIAL LATIN AMERICA, 1492 TO 1810 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chassen-Lopez, Francie R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 13.8 A 12 41.4 Sophomore 1 3.4 B 14 48.3 Junior 9 31.0 C 3 10.3 Senior 15 51.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 27.6 Studies Program 6 20.7 2 hours 11 37.9 Required by my major 21 72.4 3 hours 5 17.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.9 4 - 5 hours 4 13.8 6 - 7 hours 1 3.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 77.4 22.6 3.2 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 6.5 12.9 67.7 12.9 2.9 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 6.5 12.9 61.3 19.4 2.9 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 6.5 71.0 22.6 3.2 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 3.2 19.4 64.5 12.9 2.9 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 3.2 29.0 58.1 9.7 2.7 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 6.5 22.6 61.3 9.7 2.7 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 6.7 13.3 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 3.2 25.8 45.2 25.8 2.9 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 3.3 10.0 50.0 36.7 3.2 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 10.0 23.3 43.3 23.3 2.8 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 20.0 63.3 16.7 3.0 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 6.9 20.7 44.8 27.6 2.9 0.88 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 7.1 35.7 42.9 14.3 2.6 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 8.3 41.7 37.5 12.5 2.5 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 3.2 6.5 64.5 25.8 3.1 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 23.3 36.7 23.3 16.7 2.3 1.03 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 13.3 16.7 46.7 23.3 2.8 0.96 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 10.0 13.3 50.0 26.7 2.9 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 77.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 562 001L1 MODERN MEXICO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chassen-Lopez, Francie R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 53.3 Junior 7 43.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 18.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.3 Studies Program 4 25.0 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 8 50.0 3 hours 6 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 4 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 18.8 25.0 56.3 3.4 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 17.6 11.8 70.6 3.5 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 11.8 82.4 3.8 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 712 001S1 SEM AMER HIS 1865-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Pat ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 50.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 6 75.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 11.1 0.0 0.0 88.9 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 0.0 88.9 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 106 001L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 50.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 1 16.7 B 2 33.3 Junior 2 33.3 C 2 33.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 33.3 Studies Program 6 100.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 33.3 0.0 50.0 16.7 2.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 33.3 50.0 0.0 16.7 2.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 33.3 16.7 33.3 16.7 2.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 40.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 2.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 33.3 50.0 0.0 16.7 2.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 16.7 50.0 16.7 16.7 2.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 4.2 . 38. Question 38 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 4.2 . 39. Question 39 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 3.8 . 40. Question 40 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 4.2 . 41. Question 41 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 42. Question 42 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 3.7 . 43. Question 43 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 3.5 . 44. Question 44 6 16.7 16.7 0.0 66.7 0.0 3.2 . 45. Question 45 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 0.0 3.0 . 46. Question 46 6 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 42.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 106 002L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 25.0 A 5 33.3 Sophomore 6 37.5 B 9 60.0 Junior 3 18.8 C 1 6.7 Senior 3 18.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 37.5 Studies Program 13 86.7 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 2 13.3 3 hours 2 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 88.2 11.8 3.1 0.33 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 5.9 5.9 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 5.9 76.5 5.9 2.8 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 5.9 11.8 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 31.3 43.8 18.8 2.8 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 13.3 26.7 46.7 13.3 2.6 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 23.5 64.7 11.8 2.9 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 23.5 58.8 11.8 2.8 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 15.4 61.5 15.4 2.8 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 4.2 0.80 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 28.6 50.0 4.3 0.83 39. Question 39 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 21.4 50.0 4.2 0.89 40. Question 40 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 20.0 46.7 4.1 1.03 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 28.6 35.7 4.0 0.88 42. Question 42 15 0.0 13.3 40.0 13.3 33.3 3.7 1.11 43. Question 43 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 6.7 46.7 3.9 1.19 44. Question 44 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 13.3 40.0 3.8 1.21 45. Question 45 15 0.0 13.3 80.0 6.7 0.0 2.9 0.46 46. Question 46 15 73.3 13.3 6.7 6.7 0.0 1.5 0.92 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 89.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 106 003L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 40.0 A 2 14.3 Sophomore 4 26.7 B 9 64.3 Junior 2 13.3 C 1 7.1 Senior 3 20.0 D 1 7.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 7 46.7 Required by my major 2 13.3 3 hours 1 6.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 33.3 41.7 25.0 2.9 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 8.3 25.0 33.3 33.3 2.9 1.00 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 33.3 25.0 33.3 2.8 1.03 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 16.7 41.7 33.3 8.3 2.3 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 12 16.7 25.0 41.7 16.7 2.6 1.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 8.3 33.3 41.7 16.7 2.7 0.89 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 33.3 33.3 25.0 8.3 2.1 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 45.5 36.4 9.1 2.5 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 45.5 45.5 0.0 2.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 4.3 0.62 38. Question 38 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 4.2 0.72 39. Question 39 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 3.8 0.58 40. Question 40 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 0.0 3.6 0.67 41. Question 41 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 4.0 0.45 42. Question 42 12 8.3 16.7 33.3 41.7 0.0 3.1 1.00 43. Question 43 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 66.7 8.3 3.8 0.75 44. Question 44 12 8.3 16.7 8.3 58.3 8.3 3.4 1.16 45. Question 45 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 0.0 3.3 0.62 46. Question 46 10 90.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 1.3 0.95 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 106 004L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 44.4 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 3 33.3 B 3 33.3 Junior 1 11.1 C 4 44.4 Senior 1 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 22.2 Studies Program 6 66.7 2 hours 5 55.6 Required by my major 3 33.3 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 9.1 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 20.0 10.0 40.0 30.0 2.8 1.14 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 27.3 36.4 36.4 3.1 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 4.6 0.67 38. Question 38 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 0.52 39. Question 39 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 4.6 0.51 40. Question 40 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 16.7 58.3 4.3 0.89 41. Question 41 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 4.6 0.51 42. Question 42 11 9.1 0.0 18.2 36.4 36.4 3.9 1.22 43. Question 43 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 4.4 0.67 44. Question 44 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 25.0 50.0 4.2 1.03 45. Question 45 12 8.3 25.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.9 1.00 46. Question 46 10 70.0 20.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 1.5 0.97 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 106 005L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 44.4 A 1 11.1 Sophomore 2 22.2 B 7 77.8 Junior 3 33.3 C 1 11.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 6 66.7 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 3 33.3 3 hours 5 55.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 18.2 81.8 0.0 2.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 18.2 9.1 63.6 9.1 2.6 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 18.2 36.4 27.3 18.2 2.5 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 36.4 36.4 18.2 2.6 0.92 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 18.2 27.3 45.5 9.1 2.5 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 18.2 9.1 63.6 9.1 2.6 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 36.4 36.4 4.1 0.83 38. Question 38 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 4.0 0.77 39. Question 39 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 4.0 0.89 40. Question 40 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 3.9 0.94 41. Question 41 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 4.0 0.77 42. Question 42 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 36.4 27.3 3.8 0.98 43. Question 43 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 36.4 27.3 3.8 0.98 44. Question 44 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 4.0 0.77 45. Question 45 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 27.3 9.1 3.5 0.69 46. Question 46 10 50.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 10.0 2.2 1.55 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 61.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 106 006L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 3 23.1 B 7 53.8 Junior 5 38.5 C 1 7.7 Senior 5 38.5 D 1 7.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.7 Studies Program 12 92.3 2 hours 8 61.5 Required by my major 1 7.7 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 85.7 7.1 3.0 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 85.7 7.1 3.0 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 84.6 7.7 3.0 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 0.0 85.7 7.1 2.9 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 14.3 21.4 50.0 14.3 2.6 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 21.4 28.6 42.9 7.1 2.4 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 50.0 42.9 0.0 2.4 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 28.6 21.4 35.7 14.3 2.4 1.08 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 21.4 14.3 57.1 7.1 2.5 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 14.3 21.4 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 4.6 0.50 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 4.6 0.51 39. Question 39 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 4.4 0.65 40. Question 40 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 4.5 0.52 41. Question 41 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 4.4 0.51 42. Question 42 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 3.9 0.66 43. Question 43 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 4.1 0.66 44. Question 44 14 7.1 0.0 7.1 57.1 28.6 4.0 1.04 45. Question 45 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 0.0 3.0 0.88 46. Question 46 14 64.3 21.4 7.1 7.1 0.0 1.6 0.94 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 316 002S1 JR SEM: HIS METHOD & LIT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 1 11.1 B 7 87.5 Junior 3 33.3 C 1 12.5 Senior 5 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 11.1 44.4 33.3 11.1 2.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 33.3 33.3 22.2 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 55.6 22.2 22.2 2.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 12.5 0.0 62.5 25.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 16.7 50.0 16.7 16.7 2.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 504 001L1 GREEK AND ROMAN MEDICINE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 100.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 20.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 3 60.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 580 001L1 HISTORY OF APPALACHIA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eller, Ronald D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 88.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 11.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 52.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 47.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 11.1 Required by my major 7 38.9 3 hours 9 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 61.1 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 3 16.7 8 or more hours 2 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 5.3 0.0 0.0 94.7 3.8 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 525 001L1 EUR DIPLOMCY SINCE 1918: EUROPE 1914-1939 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Furlough, Ellen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 23.1 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 8 61.5 Junior 1 7.7 C 1 7.7 Senior 7 53.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 30.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 7.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 4 30.8 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 9 69.2 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 15.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 35.7 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 6.7 86.7 3.8 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 229 001L1 ANCIENT NEAR EAST/GREECE TO DEATH ALEX THE GREAT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gargola, ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.5 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 8 36.4 B 8 38.1 Junior 3 13.6 C 1 4.8 Senior 10 45.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 18.2 Studies Program 13 61.9 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 6 28.6 3 hours 6 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 4.2 0.0 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 16.7 45.8 37.5 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 20.8 58.3 20.8 3.0 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 12.5 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 23 8.7 34.8 34.8 21.7 2.7 0.93 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 78.3 17.4 3.1 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 17.6 70.6 11.8 2.9 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 20.8 33.3 41.7 3.1 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 20.8 25.0 54.2 3.3 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 25.0 29.2 45.8 3.2 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 8.3 0.0 66.7 25.0 3.1 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 53 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 45.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 509 001L1 ROMAN LAW INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gargola, ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 73.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 26.7 Junior 3 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 46.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 33.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 40.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 20.0 Required by my major 8 53.3 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 46.7 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 625 001S1 RDGS BRIT & BRIT EMP HIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harling, Philip R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 25.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 75.0 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 5 62.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 575 001L1 DIP & FOR POL US SC 1919 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Herring, G C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 35.7 D 1 7.1 Graduate 7 50.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 7.1 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 5 35.7 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 8 57.1 4 - 5 hours 6 42.9 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 23.5 70.6 3.6 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 5.9 35.3 41.2 17.6 2.7 0.85 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 11.8 35.3 47.1 3.2 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 5.9 17.6 76.5 3.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 70.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 595 002L1 STUDIES IN HISTORY: US AND WARS IN VIETNAM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Herring, G C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 37.0 Junior 6 21.4 C 4 14.8 Senior 16 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 14.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 7.1 Pass or Audit 1 3.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 17.9 Required by my major 15 57.7 3 hours 10 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 11 42.3 4 - 5 hours 6 21.4 6 - 7 hours 1 3.6 8 or more hours 2 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 3.3 26.7 70.0 3.7 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 3.3 33.3 63.3 3.6 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 3.3 26.7 33.3 36.7 3.0 0.89 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 3.3 53.3 43.3 3.4 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 3.3 20.0 76.7 3.7 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 0.0 23.3 76.7 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 0.0 3.3 13.3 83.3 3.8 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 44.8 55.2 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 6.9 27.6 65.5 3.6 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.9 0.31 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 3.7 7.4 88.9 3.9 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 401L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hodges, Robert C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 27.8 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 4 22.2 B 6 33.3 Junior 8 44.4 C 4 22.2 Senior 1 5.6 D 1 5.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 27.8 Studies Program 15 83.3 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 2 11.1 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 3 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 25.0 60.0 15.0 2.9 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 10.0 75.0 10.0 2.9 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 15.8 78.9 5.3 2.9 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 5.3 15.8 73.7 5.3 2.8 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 16.7 66.7 11.1 2.8 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 84.2 10.5 3.1 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 47.1 52.9 0.0 2.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 10.0 25.0 50.0 15.0 2.7 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 10.0 10.0 55.0 25.0 3.0 0.89 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 10.0 25.0 45.0 20.0 2.8 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 30.0 55.0 15.0 2.9 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 12.5 12.5 75.0 0.0 2.6 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 11.8 29.4 58.8 0.0 2.5 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 13.3 26.7 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 27.8 61.1 5.6 2.7 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 11.1 22.2 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 30.0 45.0 20.0 2.8 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 10.0 40.0 25.0 25.0 2.7 0.99. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 45.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 013L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 80.0 A 1 10.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 60.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 3 30.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 6 60.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 4 40.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 38.5 46.2 7.7 2.5 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 23.1 69.2 0.0 2.6 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7 2.7 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 38.5 53.8 7.7 2.7 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 46.2 38.5 7.7 2.5 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 38.5 53.8 7.7 2.7 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 66.7 25.0 8.3 2.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.0 2.9 0.29 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 38.5 61.5 0.0 2.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 46.2 46.2 7.7 2.6 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 15.4 23.1 46.2 15.4 3.6 0.96 38. Question 38 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 4.2 0.60 39. Question 39 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 30.8 7.7 3.3 0.85 40. Question 40 13 0.0 30.8 61.5 0.0 7.7 2.8 0.80 41. Question 41 13 7.7 0.0 30.8 53.8 7.7 3.5 0.97 42. Question 42 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 15.4 7.7 3.0 1.00 43. Question 43 13 7.7 15.4 38.5 23.1 15.4 3.2 1.17 44. Question 44 13 15.4 15.4 30.8 30.8 7.7 3.0 1.22 45. Question 45 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 0.0 3.1 0.49 46. Question 46 13 53.8 38.5 7.7 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.66 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 014L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 83.3 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 2 16.7 B 8 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 25.0 Studies Program 11 91.7 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 1 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 3.1 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 6.3 0.0 6.3 50.0 37.5 4.1 1.02 38. Question 38 16 6.3 0.0 25.0 43.8 25.0 3.8 1.05 39. Question 39 16 6.3 0.0 25.0 37.5 31.3 3.9 1.09 40. Question 40 16 6.3 0.0 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.9 1.00 41. Question 41 16 0.0 6.3 6.3 56.3 31.3 4.1 0.81 42. Question 42 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 25.0 31.3 3.8 0.98 43. Question 43 16 0.0 6.3 18.8 37.5 37.5 4.1 0.93 44. Question 44 16 6.3 0.0 18.8 37.5 37.5 4.0 1.10 45. Question 45 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 25.0 12.5 3.4 0.89 46. Question 46 15 60.0 13.3 6.7 13.3 6.7 1.9 1.39 47. Question 47 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 4.0 . 48. Question 48 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 3.3 . 49. Question 49 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 3.7 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 015L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 66.7 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 3 25.0 B 7 58.3 Junior 1 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 58.3 Studies Program 10 83.3 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 0.0 62.5 31.3 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 8.3 16.7 41.7 33.3 3.0 0.95 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 6.3 25.0 43.8 25.0 2.9 0.89 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 33. Amount of work appropriate 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 34. Instructor explained expectations 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 35. Instructor helped with my problems 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 4.6 0.50 38. Question 38 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 4.6 0.51 39. Question 39 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 4.6 0.63 40. Question 40 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 4.5 0.63 41. Question 41 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 4.6 0.50 42. Question 42 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 37.5 31.3 4.0 0.82 43. Question 43 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 4.5 0.63 44. Question 44 15 0.0 6.7 20.0 26.7 46.7 4.1 0.99 45. Question 45 16 0.0 0.0 93.8 6.3 0.0 3.1 0.25 46. Question 46 15 53.3 33.3 0.0 13.3 0.0 1.7 1.03 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 016L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 57.1 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 2 28.6 B 1 14.3 Junior 1 14.3 C 2 28.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 57.1 Studies Program 5 71.4 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 4.7 0.63 38. Question 38 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 4.7 0.63 39. Question 39 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 7.7 84.6 4.8 0.60 40. Question 40 13 0.0 7.7 0.0 7.7 84.6 4.7 0.85 41. Question 41 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 7.7 84.6 4.8 0.60 42. Question 42 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 30.8 38.5 4.0 1.00 43. Question 43 13 0.0 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 4.4 0.87 44. Question 44 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 4.7 0.63 45. Question 45 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 7.7 7.7 3.2 0.69 46. Question 46 13 15.4 53.8 15.4 0.0 15.4 2.5 1.27 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 017L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 37.5 A 6 37.5 Sophomore 7 43.8 B 10 62.5 Junior 2 12.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 6.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 12.5 Studies Program 13 81.3 2 hours 7 43.8 Required by my major 1 6.3 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 11.8 17.6 52.9 17.6 2.8 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 5.9 17.6 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 5.9 17.6 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 25.0 43.8 25.0 2.9 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 12.5 31.3 31.3 25.0 2.7 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 5.9 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 44.4 44.4 11.1 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 33. Amount of work appropriate 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 10.0 90.0 0.0 2.9 0.32 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 52.9 29.4 4.1 0.70 38. Question 38 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 4.2 0.56 39. Question 39 17 0.0 11.8 11.8 47.1 29.4 3.9 0.97 40. Question 40 17 5.9 5.9 23.5 47.1 17.6 3.6 1.06 41. Question 41 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 70.6 11.8 3.9 0.56 42. Question 42 17 11.8 23.5 17.6 35.3 11.8 3.1 1.27 43. Question 43 17 5.9 23.5 11.8 47.1 11.8 3.4 1.17 44. Question 44 17 11.8 11.8 17.6 47.1 11.8 3.4 1.22 45. Question 45 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 0.0 3.2 0.66 46. Question 46 17 64.7 35.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.49 Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 018L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 50.0 A 8 50.0 Sophomore 6 37.5 B 6 37.5 Junior 1 6.3 C 1 6.3 Senior 1 6.3 D 1 6.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 14 87.5 2 hours 7 43.8 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 6.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 18.8 25.0 43.8 12.5 2.5 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 5.9 0.0 58.8 35.3 3.2 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 5.9 0.0 70.6 23.5 3.1 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 0.0 70.6 23.5 3.1 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 5.9 17.6 76.5 0.0 2.7 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 5.9 11.8 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.86 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 11.8 58.8 17.6 2.8 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 16 12.5 37.5 31.3 18.8 2.6 0.96 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 17.6 58.8 23.5 3.1 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 41.2 41.2 11.8 2.6 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 11.8 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 5.9 41.2 47.1 3.3 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 0.0 5.9 0.0 41.2 52.9 4.4 0.80 38. Question 38 17 0.0 5.9 0.0 58.8 35.3 4.2 0.75 39. Question 39 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 4.6 0.49 40. Question 40 17 5.9 5.9 0.0 41.2 47.1 4.2 1.13 41. Question 41 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 4.3 0.69 42. Question 42 17 0.0 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 4.1 0.83 43. Question 43 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 4.2 0.56 44. Question 44 17 5.9 0.0 0.0 64.7 29.4 4.1 0.93 45. Question 45 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 35.3 5.9 3.4 0.71 46. Question 46 17 41.2 41.2 11.8 5.9 0.0 1.8 0.88 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 89.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 019L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 42.1 A 9 47.4 Sophomore 9 47.4 B 9 47.4 Junior 2 10.5 C 1 5.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 26.3 Studies Program 16 84.2 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 1 5.3 3 hours 6 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.5 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 13.3 73.3 6.7 2.8 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 0.0 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 20.0 60.0 13.3 2.8 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 15.4 15.4 53.8 15.4 2.7 0.95 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 4.3 0.73 38. Question 38 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 42.1 21.1 3.8 0.85 39. Question 39 19 0.0 5.3 5.3 26.3 63.2 4.5 0.84 40. Question 40 19 0.0 5.3 5.3 42.1 47.4 4.3 0.82 41. Question 41 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 4.5 0.70 42. Question 42 19 0.0 5.3 15.8 52.6 26.3 4.0 0.82 43. Question 43 19 5.3 0.0 10.5 36.8 47.4 4.2 1.03 44. Question 44 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 36.8 42.1 4.2 0.79 45. Question 45 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 0.0 3.3 0.59 46. Question 46 18 44.4 22.2 11.1 22.2 0.0 2.1 1.23 48. Question 48 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 020L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 53.8 A 2 15.4 Sophomore 5 38.5 B 9 69.2 Junior 1 7.7 C 1 7.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 7.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 38.5 Studies Program 9 69.2 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 93.3 0.0 2.9 0.26 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 6.7 0.0 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 35.7 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 92.9 0.0 2.9 0.27 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 13.3 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 54.5 45.5 0.0 2.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 3.0 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 33.3 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 62.5 37.5 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.53 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 3.9 0.64 38. Question 38 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 53.3 20.0 3.9 0.70 39. Question 39 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 28.6 14.3 3.5 0.85 40. Question 40 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 46.7 13.3 3.7 0.82 41. Question 41 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 3.9 0.74 42. Question 42 14 7.1 28.6 21.4 35.7 7.1 3.1 1.14 43. Question 43 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 33.3 13.3 3.6 0.74 44. Question 44 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 26.7 13.3 3.4 0.91 45. Question 45 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 0.0 3.1 0.35 46. Question 46 14 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.52 49. Question 49 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 021L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 85.7 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 8 57.1 Junior 1 7.1 C 1 7.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 13 92.9 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 22.2 38.9 38.9 3.2 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 17.6 76.5 3.7 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 26.7 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 5.9 5.9 70.6 17.6 3.0 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 33. Amount of work appropriate 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 34. Instructor explained expectations 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 35. Instructor helped with my problems 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 22.2 72.2 4.7 0.59 38. Question 38 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 4.7 0.69 39. Question 39 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 5.6 83.3 4.7 0.67 40. Question 40 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 5.6 77.8 4.6 0.78 41. Question 41 17 0.0 5.9 11.8 5.9 76.5 4.5 0.94 42. Question 42 18 5.6 5.6 11.1 27.8 50.0 4.1 1.18 43. Question 43 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 4.7 0.69 44. Question 44 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 11.1 72.2 4.6 0.78 45. Question 45 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 27.8 11.1 3.5 0.71 46. Question 46 17 58.8 5.9 11.8 17.6 5.9 2.1 1.43 47. Question 47 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 48. Question 48 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 49. Question 49 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 022L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 17 100.0 A 7 41.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 52.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 5.9 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 17.6 Studies Program 12 75.0 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 2 12.5 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 11.1 50.0 33.3 5.6 2.3 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 11.8 82.4 5.9 2.9 0.43 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 22.2 55.6 16.7 2.8 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 43.8 37.5 12.5 2.6 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 29.4 52.9 11.8 2.7 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 4.7 0.49 38. Question 38 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 4.7 0.49 39. Question 39 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 4.8 0.38 40. Question 40 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 4.4 0.51 41. Question 41 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 4.6 0.51 42. Question 42 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 3.8 0.65 43. Question 43 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 4.3 0.59 44. Question 44 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 4.3 0.67 45. Question 45 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 0.0 3.1 0.54 46. Question 46 17 41.2 35.3 5.9 17.6 0.0 2.0 1.12 Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 023L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 68.8 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 3 18.8 B 5 33.3 Junior 2 12.5 C 2 13.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 9 56.3 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 4 25.0 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 18.8 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 43.8 31.3 18.8 2.6 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 23.5 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 5.9 5.9 35.3 52.9 3.4 0.86 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 17 5.9 23.5 41.2 29.4 2.9 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 23.5 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 4.7 0.47 38. Question 38 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 4.6 0.49 39. Question 39 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 17.6 76.5 4.7 0.59 40. Question 40 17 0.0 5.9 0.0 23.5 70.6 4.6 0.80 41. Question 41 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 17.6 58.8 4.4 0.86 42. Question 42 17 11.8 0.0 11.8 41.2 35.3 3.9 1.27 43. Question 43 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 4.3 0.69 44. Question 44 17 5.9 0.0 5.9 35.3 52.9 4.3 1.05 45. Question 45 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 17.6 5.9 3.2 0.73 46. Question 46 17 70.6 17.6 0.0 5.9 5.9 1.6 1.18 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 89.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 024L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 80.0 A 6 40.0 Sophomore 2 13.3 B 8 53.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 6.7 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 7 46.7 Required by my major 2 13.3 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 4 26.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 47.1 29.4 23.5 2.8 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 17.6 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 33. Amount of work appropriate 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 34. Instructor explained expectations 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 35. Instructor helped with my problems 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 4.3 0.75 38. Question 38 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 4.3 0.59 39. Question 39 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 4.4 0.70 40. Question 40 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 4.3 0.75 41. Question 41 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 22.2 61.1 4.4 0.78 42. Question 42 17 0.0 23.5 5.9 52.9 17.6 3.6 1.06 43. Question 43 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 4.3 0.77 44. Question 44 18 0.0 5.6 16.7 33.3 44.4 4.2 0.92 45. Question 45 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 0.0 3.2 0.39 46. Question 46 14 42.9 21.4 28.6 0.0 7.1 2.1 1.21 47. Question 47 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 351 001L1 TOPS US HIS SINCE 1789: FAMOUS AM CRIMINAL TRIAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 57.1 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 6 42.9 Junior 2 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 78.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 42.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 6 46.2 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 7 53.8 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 68.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 572 001L1 AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 58.6 Sophomore 2 6.9 B 9 31.0 Junior 10 34.5 C 1 3.4 Senior 17 58.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 6.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 17.2 Studies Program 6 20.7 2 hours 5 17.2 Required by my major 15 51.7 3 hours 9 31.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 27.6 4 - 5 hours 7 24.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.4 8 or more hours 2 6.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 0.0 0.0 21.2 78.8 3.8 0.42 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 3.0 24.2 72.7 3.7 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 6.1 24.2 69.7 3.6 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 3.1 25.0 71.9 3.7 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 3.0 36.4 60.6 3.6 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 3.0 6.1 90.9 3.9 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 0.0 3.0 97.0 4.0 0.17 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 0.0 24.2 75.8 3.8 0.44 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 0.0 6.1 93.9 3.9 0.24 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 0.0 21.9 78.1 3.8 0.42 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 0.0 21.9 78.1 3.8 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 3.1 37.5 59.4 3.6 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 0.0 3.0 12.1 84.8 3.8 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 64 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 51.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 265 001L1 HIST OF WOMEN IN AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kern, Kathi ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 87.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 13.0 Junior 7 30.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 65.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 17.4 Studies Program 2 8.7 2 hours 10 43.5 Required by my major 15 65.2 3 hours 7 30.4 Other (e.g. elective) 6 26.1 4 - 5 hours 2 8.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 20.0 76.0 3.7 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 4.0 4.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 32.0 64.0 3.6 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 4.2 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 4.0 12.0 84.0 3.8 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 73.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 606 001S1 HISTORICAL CRITICISM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kern, Kathi ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 75.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 25.0 4 - 5 hours 4 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 2 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 9.1 0.0 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 650 002S1 RDGS SPEC TOPS HISTORY: TOPICS IN AMER HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kern, Kathi ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 90.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 18.2 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 81.8 4 - 5 hours 3 30.0 6 - 7 hours 3 30.0 8 or more hours 4 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 3.7 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 3.7 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 12.5 0.0 87.5 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 12.5 0.0 87.5 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 104 201L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = King, David V ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 3 60.0 C 1 20.0 Senior 2 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 3 60.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 20.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 2.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 105 401L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = King, David V ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 14.3 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 7 50.0 Junior 6 42.9 C 1 7.1 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 50.0 Studies Program 6 46.2 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 5 38.5 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 15.4 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 26.7 40.0 33.3 3.1 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 61.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 109 401L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mcintire, Anthony A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 6 37.5 B 5 33.3 Junior 4 25.0 C 2 13.3 Senior 5 31.3 D 1 6.7 Graduate 1 6.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 10 66.7 2 hours 3 20.0 Required by my major 2 13.3 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 20.0 4 - 5 hours 4 26.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 5.0 20.0 70.0 5.0 2.8 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 15.0 80.0 5.0 2.9 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 5.0 0.0 65.0 30.0 3.2 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 5.0 15.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 10.5 73.7 15.8 3.1 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 84.2 0.0 2.8 0.37 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 10.0 65.0 20.0 3.0 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 20.0 45.0 30.0 3.0 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 0.32 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 77.8 5.6 2.9 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.41 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 30.0 65.0 5.0 2.8 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 15.8 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 15.8 31.6 47.4 3.2 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 11.1 33.3 44.4 11.1 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 43.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 025L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 54.5 A 6 54.5 Sophomore 2 18.2 B 3 27.3 Junior 2 18.2 C 2 18.2 Senior 1 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 8 72.7 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 2 18.2 3 hours 6 54.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 4.6 0.63 38. Question 38 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 4.5 0.64 39. Question 39 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 4.6 0.63 40. Question 40 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 4.5 0.64 41. Question 41 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 20.0 66.7 4.5 0.74 42. Question 42 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 4.3 0.72 43. Question 43 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 4.6 0.63 44. Question 44 15 0.0 6.7 6.7 33.3 53.3 4.3 0.90 45. Question 45 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 6.7 13.3 3.2 0.86 46. Question 46 13 30.8 46.2 7.7 15.4 0.0 2.1 1.04 47. Question 47 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 76.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 026L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 66.7 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 3 25.0 B 5 41.7 Junior 1 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 11 91.7 2 hours 8 66.7 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 6.3 6.3 37.5 50.0 3.3 0.87 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 4.4 0.51 38. Question 38 15 6.7 6.7 13.3 60.0 13.3 3.7 1.05 39. Question 39 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 4.4 0.74 40. Question 40 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 4.2 0.77 41. Question 41 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 4.5 0.64 42. Question 42 15 6.7 0.0 26.7 40.0 26.7 3.8 1.08 43. Question 43 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 4.3 0.62 44. Question 44 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 4.2 0.77 45. Question 45 15 6.7 20.0 66.7 0.0 6.7 2.8 0.86 46. Question 46 15 40.0 26.7 20.0 6.7 6.7 2.1 1.25 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 027L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 50.0 A 8 57.1 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 5 35.7 Junior 1 7.1 C 1 7.1 Senior 2 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 42.9 Studies Program 12 85.7 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 25.0 62.5 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 4.8 0.39 38. Question 38 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 4.7 0.47 39. Question 39 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 4.9 0.33 40. Question 40 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 4.7 0.47 41. Question 41 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 4.7 0.47 42. Question 42 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 4.5 0.51 43. Question 43 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 4.7 0.47 44. Question 44 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 4.6 0.49 45. Question 45 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 18.8 6.3 3.2 0.75 46. Question 46 17 70.6 11.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 1.6 1.22 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 028L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 69.2 A 10 76.9 Sophomore 3 23.1 B 3 23.1 Junior 1 7.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 23.1 Studies Program 13 100.0 2 hours 6 46.2 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 9.1 18.2 63.6 3.4 1.03 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 6.3 56.3 31.3 3.1 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 14.3 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.92 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 31.3 50.0 12.5 2.7 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 36.4 27.3 27.3 2.7 1.01 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 6.7 26.7 33.3 33.3 2.9 0.96 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 4.8 0.40 38. Question 38 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 4.9 0.34 39. Question 39 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 4.6 0.62 40. Question 40 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 4.6 0.72 41. Question 41 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 4.8 0.40 42. Question 42 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3 4.1 0.74 43. Question 43 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 4.6 0.62 44. Question 44 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 4.6 0.63 45. Question 45 16 0.0 0.0 93.8 6.3 0.0 3.1 0.25 46. Question 46 14 50.0 28.6 7.1 7.1 7.1 1.9 1.27 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 029L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 33.3 A 7 77.8 Sophomore 3 33.3 B 1 11.1 Junior 1 11.1 C 1 11.1 Senior 2 22.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 77.8 Studies Program 6 66.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 22.2 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 12.5 12.5 25.0 50.0 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 0.0 62.5 25.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 7.7 0.0 23.1 69.2 4.5 0.88 38. Question 38 13 0.0 7.7 0.0 23.1 69.2 4.5 0.88 39. Question 39 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 4.8 0.44 40. Question 40 13 0.0 7.7 0.0 15.4 76.9 4.6 0.87 41. Question 41 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 4.6 0.51 42. Question 42 13 7.7 7.7 15.4 38.5 30.8 3.8 1.24 43. Question 43 13 7.7 0.0 0.0 38.5 53.8 4.3 1.11 44. Question 44 13 7.7 0.0 7.7 38.5 46.2 4.2 1.14 45. Question 45 13 7.7 7.7 76.9 7.7 0.0 2.8 0.69 46. Question 46 13 61.5 30.8 0.0 7.7 0.0 1.5 0.88 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 030L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 15.4 A 10 76.9 Sophomore 7 53.8 B 3 23.1 Junior 3 23.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 46.2 Studies Program 11 84.6 2 hours 6 46.2 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 12.5 0.0 43.8 43.8 3.2 0.98 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 26.7 60.0 3.5 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 12.5 31.3 50.0 3.3 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 4.2 0.71 38. Question 38 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 4.6 0.51 39. Question 39 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 4.3 0.67 40. Question 40 18 0.0 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 4.1 0.87 41. Question 41 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 4.3 0.60 42. Question 42 17 5.9 5.9 23.5 35.3 29.4 3.8 1.15 43. Question 43 18 0.0 5.6 11.1 50.0 33.3 4.1 0.83 44. Question 44 18 0.0 5.6 0.0 55.6 38.9 4.3 0.75 45. Question 45 18 5.6 11.1 66.7 11.1 5.6 3.0 0.84 46. Question 46 15 53.3 26.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 1.9 1.25 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 031L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 66.7 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 2 33.3 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 33.3 Studies Program 6 100.0 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 14.3 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.92 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 0.0 46.2 46.2 3.3 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 7.1 35.7 50.0 3.3 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 7.1 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 0.0 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 14.3 71.4 7.1 2.8 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 7.1 14.3 71.4 3.5 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 11.1 0.0 66.7 22.2 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 0.0 66.7 22.2 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 7.1 7.1 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.9 1.27 38. Question 38 14 7.1 7.1 21.4 35.7 28.6 3.7 1.20 39. Question 39 14 14.3 7.1 7.1 28.6 42.9 3.8 1.48 40. Question 40 14 0.0 14.3 21.4 21.4 42.9 3.9 1.14 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 28.6 50.0 4.3 0.83 42. Question 42 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 3.9 0.86 43. Question 43 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 30.8 46.2 4.2 0.99 44. Question 44 13 0.0 15.4 0.0 38.5 46.2 4.2 1.07 45. Question 45 14 7.1 7.1 57.1 21.4 7.1 3.1 0.95 46. Question 46 11 36.4 54.5 0.0 9.1 0.0 1.8 0.87 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 032L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 25.0 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 9 75.0 B 5 41.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 50.0 Studies Program 10 83.3 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 0.0 80.0 13.3 3.0 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 13.3 13.3 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.99 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 20.0 20.0 26.7 33.3 2.7 1.16 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 6.7 6.7 66.7 20.0 3.0 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 0.0 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 7.1 0.0 57.1 35.7 3.2 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 28.6 42.9 21.4 2.8 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 7.1 50.0 35.7 3.1 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 21.4 42.9 28.6 2.9 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 4.6 0.63 38. Question 38 15 0.0 6.7 6.7 6.7 80.0 4.6 0.91 39. Question 39 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 20.0 73.3 4.7 0.62 40. Question 40 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 20.0 66.7 4.5 0.74 41. Question 41 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 20.0 66.7 4.5 0.74 42. Question 42 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 14.3 50.0 4.1 0.95 43. Question 43 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 20.0 66.7 4.5 0.74 44. Question 44 14 0.0 14.3 7.1 21.4 57.1 4.2 1.12 45. Question 45 15 13.3 6.7 60.0 13.3 6.7 2.9 1.03 46. Question 46 14 71.4 14.3 7.1 0.0 7.1 1.6 1.16 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 033L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 64.3 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 5 35.7 B 3 21.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 7.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 7.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 13 92.9 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 15.4 30.8 53.8 0.0 2.4 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 13.3 86.7 0.0 2.9 0.35 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 6.7 0.0 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 33.3 53.3 13.3 2.8 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 40.0 53.3 6.7 2.7 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 6.7 20.0 60.0 13.3 2.8 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 6.7 13.3 73.3 6.7 2.8 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 64.3 28.6 0.0 2.2 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 53.3 40.0 6.7 2.5 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 0.0 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 33. Amount of work appropriate 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 34. Instructor explained expectations 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 35. Instructor helped with my problems 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 4.3 0.62 38. Question 38 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 4.5 0.52 39. Question 39 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 4.2 0.68 40. Question 40 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3 4.1 0.74 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 4.4 0.50 42. Question 42 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 57.1 7.1 3.6 0.74 43. Question 43 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 3.8 0.70 44. Question 44 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 33.3 40.0 4.1 0.83 45. Question 45 15 6.7 20.0 60.0 13.3 0.0 2.8 0.77 46. Question 46 15 66.7 6.7 13.3 13.3 0.0 1.7 1.16 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 034L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 50.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 4 40.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 30.0 Studies Program 8 80.0 2 hours 5 50.0 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 7.7 0.0 23.1 69.2 4.5 0.88 38. Question 38 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 4.5 0.52 39. Question 39 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 4.5 0.66 40. Question 40 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 4.5 0.66 41. Question 41 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 15.4 69.2 4.5 0.78 42. Question 42 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 4.1 0.67 43. Question 43 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 4.7 0.63 44. Question 44 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 4.5 0.66 45. Question 45 13 0.0 7.7 84.6 0.0 7.7 3.1 0.64 46. Question 46 13 76.9 7.7 7.7 7.7 0.0 1.5 0.97 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 035L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 71.4 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 4 28.6 Junior 2 14.3 C 1 7.1 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 10 71.4 2 hours 7 50.0 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 21.4 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 5.6 72.2 16.7 3.0 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 25.0 41.7 25.0 2.8 0.94 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 35.3 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 4.2 0.73 38. Question 38 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 4.2 0.73 39. Question 39 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 4.3 0.69 40. Question 40 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 35.3 41.2 4.2 0.81 41. Question 41 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 23.5 52.9 4.3 0.85 42. Question 42 17 0.0 11.8 29.4 47.1 11.8 3.6 0.87 43. Question 43 17 5.9 0.0 11.8 70.6 11.8 3.8 0.88 44. Question 44 17 0.0 11.8 29.4 41.2 17.6 3.6 0.93 45. Question 45 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 11.8 5.9 3.1 0.70 46. Question 46 16 62.5 25.0 6.3 0.0 6.3 1.6 1.09 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 036L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 41.7 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 6 50.0 B 5 41.7 Junior 1 8.3 C 2 16.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 16.7 Studies Program 11 91.7 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 0.0 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 0.0 69.2 23.1 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 46.2 38.5 15.4 2.7 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 7.7 0.0 69.2 23.1 3.1 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 15.4 61.5 15.4 2.8 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 0.0 83.3 8.3 2.9 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 7.7 0.0 76.9 15.4 3.0 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 38.5 53.8 0.0 2.5 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 0.0 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 11.1 44.4 44.4 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 9.1 36.4 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 4.6 0.50 38. Question 38 11 0.0 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 4.4 0.92 39. Question 39 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 4.4 0.67 40. Question 40 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 4.2 0.60 41. Question 41 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 4.5 0.52 42. Question 42 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 3.9 0.54 43. Question 43 11 0.0 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 4.2 0.87 44. Question 44 11 0.0 18.2 9.1 36.4 36.4 3.9 1.14 45. Question 45 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 0.0 3.0 0.43 46. Question 46 10 90.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.32 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 68.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 001L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 27.3 A 8 72.7 Sophomore 6 54.5 B 3 27.3 Junior 2 18.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 8 72.7 2 hours 7 63.6 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 18.2 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 8.3 0.0 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 4.5 0.67 38. Question 38 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 4.4 0.67 39. Question 39 12 0.0 8.3 0.0 33.3 58.3 4.4 0.90 40. Question 40 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 4.3 0.65 41. Question 41 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 4.6 0.51 42. Question 42 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 36.4 36.4 4.0 1.00 43. Question 43 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 4.4 0.51 44. Question 44 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 4.3 0.65 45. Question 45 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 8.3 8.3 3.1 0.79 46. Question 46 11 81.8 9.1 0.0 0.0 9.1 1.5 1.21 Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 002L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 21.4 A 8 57.1 Sophomore 6 42.9 B 5 35.7 Junior 3 21.4 C 1 7.1 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 14.3 Studies Program 9 64.3 2 hours 7 50.0 Required by my major 3 21.4 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 13.3 33.3 46.7 3.2 0.94 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 27.3 72.7 0.0 2.7 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 42.9 35.7 21.4 2.8 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 0.0 5.9 0.0 35.3 58.8 4.5 0.80 38. Question 38 17 0.0 5.9 5.9 47.1 41.2 4.2 0.83 39. Question 39 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 4.4 0.61 40. Question 40 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 4.4 0.62 41. Question 41 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 4.5 0.62 42. Question 42 16 6.3 0.0 18.8 50.0 25.0 3.9 1.02 43. Question 43 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 4.1 0.49 44. Question 44 17 0.0 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 4.2 0.81 45. Question 45 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 0.0 2.9 0.49 46. Question 46 16 62.5 25.0 6.3 0.0 6.3 1.6 1.09 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 003L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 14.3 A 8 57.1 Sophomore 5 35.7 B 5 35.7 Junior 3 21.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 28.6 D 1 7.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 35.7 Studies Program 10 76.9 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 6.3 12.5 75.0 6.3 2.8 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 6.7 66.7 20.0 3.0 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 2.9 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 6.7 26.7 40.0 26.7 2.9 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 25.0 43.8 25.0 2.9 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 35.7 57.1 7.1 2.7 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 53.8 38.5 7.7 2.5 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 46.7 33.3 13.3 2.5 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 20.0 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 25.0 18.8 3.5 0.97 38. Question 38 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 4.0 0.73 39. Question 39 16 6.3 37.5 6.3 50.0 0.0 3.0 1.10 40. Question 40 16 12.5 31.3 25.0 31.3 0.0 2.8 1.06 41. Question 41 14 0.0 21.4 28.6 42.9 7.1 3.4 0.93 42. Question 42 16 12.5 18.8 37.5 31.3 0.0 2.9 1.02 43. Question 43 16 6.3 6.3 50.0 37.5 0.0 3.2 0.83 44. Question 44 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 43.8 12.5 3.6 0.81 45. Question 45 16 6.3 18.8 68.8 6.3 0.0 2.8 0.68 46. Question 46 15 80.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.41 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 004L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.5 A 15 78.9 Sophomore 10 52.6 B 4 21.1 Junior 5 26.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 10.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 57.9 Studies Program 17 89.5 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 2 10.5 3 hours 1 5.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 23.5 47.1 23.5 2.9 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 27.8 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 35.3 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 22.2 38.9 38.9 3.2 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 23.5 47.1 29.4 3.1 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 29.4 47.1 23.5 2.9 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 22.2 38.9 38.9 3.2 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 7.1 92.9 0.0 2.9 0.27 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 4.7 0.48 38. Question 38 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 42.1 31.6 4.1 0.78 39. Question 39 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 4.4 0.61 40. Question 40 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 4.4 0.51 41. Question 41 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 4.4 0.51 42. Question 42 19 0.0 15.8 10.5 42.1 31.6 3.9 1.05 43. Question 43 19 0.0 10.5 5.3 36.8 47.4 4.2 0.98 44. Question 44 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 4.4 0.61 45. Question 45 19 10.5 42.1 36.8 10.5 0.0 2.5 0.84 46. Question 46 19 94.7 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 1.2 0.69 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 005L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 9.1 A 8 72.7 Sophomore 8 72.7 B 3 27.3 Junior 1 9.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 63.6 Studies Program 10 100.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 8.3 41.7 33.3 16.7 2.6 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 46.2 30.8 15.4 2.5 0.88 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 41.7 41.7 16.7 2.8 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 53.8 38.5 7.7 2.5 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 3.9 0.86 38. Question 38 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 30.8 46.2 4.2 0.99 39. Question 39 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 30.8 15.4 3.5 0.97 40. Question 40 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 23.1 30.8 3.8 1.01 41. Question 41 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 9.1 45.5 4.0 1.00 42. Question 42 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 25.0 8.3 3.3 0.87 43. Question 43 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 3.9 0.86 44. Question 44 13 0.0 15.4 15.4 46.2 23.1 3.8 1.01 45. Question 45 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 0.0 2.8 0.58 46. Question 46 12 66.7 25.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.67 47. Question 47 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 006L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 4 40.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 5 50.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 60.0 Studies Program 7 70.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 3 30.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 30.8 30.8 38.5 3.1 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 23.1 23.1 53.8 3.3 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 4.7 0.46 38. Question 38 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 4.3 0.72 39. Question 39 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 4.4 0.74 40. Question 40 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 4.6 0.51 41. Question 41 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 4.7 0.49 42. Question 42 15 0.0 13.3 20.0 26.7 40.0 3.9 1.10 43. Question 43 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 4.7 0.46 44. Question 44 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 4.5 0.52 45. Question 45 15 0.0 6.7 93.3 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.26 46. Question 46 15 73.3 26.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.46 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 007L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 40.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 2 40.0 B 3 60.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 3 60.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 14.3 0.0 85.7 0.0 2.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 3.9 . 38. Question 38 7 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 0.0 3.0 . 39. Question 39 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 28.6 28.6 3.7 . 40. Question 40 7 14.3 0.0 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.9 . 41. Question 41 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 4.0 . 42. Question 42 7 14.3 0.0 14.3 57.1 14.3 3.6 . 43. Question 43 7 14.3 0.0 0.0 28.6 57.1 4.1 . 44. Question 44 7 14.3 0.0 0.0 28.6 57.1 4.1 . 45. Question 45 7 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 0.0 2.7 . 46. Question 46 7 85.7 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 . Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 43.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 008L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 55.6 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 3 33.3 B 6 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 11.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 5 55.6 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 1 11.1 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 33.3 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 10.0 10.0 80.0 0.0 2.7 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 44.4 33.3 11.1 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 6.7 20.0 26.7 46.7 4.1 0.99 38. Question 38 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 4.5 0.64 39. Question 39 15 6.7 6.7 26.7 40.0 20.0 3.6 1.12 40. Question 40 15 6.7 6.7 40.0 33.3 13.3 3.4 1.06 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 4.2 0.58 42. Question 42 15 6.7 13.3 46.7 26.7 6.7 3.1 0.99 43. Question 43 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 53.3 13.3 3.8 0.68 44. Question 44 15 0.0 6.7 6.7 53.3 33.3 4.1 0.83 45. Question 45 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 0.0 3.2 0.56 46. Question 46 15 86.7 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 1.4 1.06 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 009L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 69.2 Sophomore 6 46.2 B 4 30.8 Junior 2 15.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 38.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 23.1 Studies Program 10 76.9 2 hours 6 46.2 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 41.7 41.7 16.7 2.8 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 36.4 36.4 18.2 2.6 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 54.5 36.4 9.1 2.5 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 66.7 25.0 8.3 2.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 25.0 50.0 16.7 8.3 2.1 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 4.2 0.70 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 4.4 0.65 39. Question 39 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 4.0 0.78 40. Question 40 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 35.7 21.4 3.7 0.91 41. Question 41 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 42.9 28.6 3.9 0.92 42. Question 42 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 28.6 21.4 3.6 1.02 43. Question 43 14 0.0 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 3.7 0.91 44. Question 44 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 35.7 35.7 4.1 0.83 45. Question 45 14 0.0 7.1 85.7 0.0 7.1 3.1 0.62 46. Question 46 13 84.6 7.7 0.0 0.0 7.7 1.4 1.12 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 70.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 010L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 28.6 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 4 57.1 B 2 28.6 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 7 100.0 2 hours 4 57.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 50.0 37.5 12.5 2.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 2.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 4.1 . 38. Question 38 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 3.8 . 39. Question 39 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 25.0 37.5 3.8 . 40. Question 40 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 37.5 25.0 3.8 . 41. Question 41 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 4.1 . 42. Question 42 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 3.9 . 43. Question 43 8 0.0 12.5 0.0 62.5 25.0 4.0 . 44. Question 44 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 3.9 . 45. Question 45 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 12.5 12.5 3.4 . 46. Question 46 8 50.0 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 2.3 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 42.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 011L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 26.7 A 5 33.3 Sophomore 10 66.7 B 9 60.0 Junior 1 6.7 C 1 6.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 12 85.7 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 6.3 50.0 37.5 3.2 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 11.8 5.9 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.97 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 5.9 23.5 41.2 29.4 2.9 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 5.9 41.2 41.2 11.8 2.6 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 5.9 29.4 41.2 23.5 2.8 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 18.8 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 17 5.9 11.8 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 18.8 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 31.3 50.0 18.8 2.9 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 6.7 46.7 26.7 20.0 2.6 0.91 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 37.5 37.5 18.8 2.7 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 17.6 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 12 8.3 8.3 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.97 33. Amount of work appropriate 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 3.3 0.89 34. Instructor explained expectations 12 8.3 16.7 33.3 41.7 3.1 1.00 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 9.1 9.1 27.3 54.5 3.3 1.01 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 0.0 5.9 23.5 41.2 29.4 3.9 0.90 38. Question 38 17 0.0 11.8 23.5 41.2 23.5 3.8 0.97 39. Question 39 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 35.3 41.2 4.2 0.81 40. Question 40 17 0.0 11.8 11.8 47.1 29.4 3.9 0.97 41. Question 41 17 0.0 5.9 17.6 41.2 35.3 4.1 0.90 42. Question 42 17 0.0 35.3 23.5 23.5 17.6 3.2 1.15 43. Question 43 17 0.0 29.4 17.6 23.5 29.4 3.5 1.23 44. Question 44 17 5.9 17.6 17.6 29.4 29.4 3.6 1.28 45. Question 45 17 17.6 11.8 58.8 11.8 0.0 2.6 0.93 46. Question 46 16 81.3 12.5 6.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.58 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 012L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 54.5 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 4 36.4 B 2 18.2 Junior 1 9.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 36.4 Studies Program 8 80.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 5 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 4.1 0.77 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 4.2 0.70 39. Question 39 14 0.0 14.3 21.4 57.1 7.1 3.6 0.85 40. Question 40 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 21.4 50.0 4.1 1.03 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 35.7 35.7 4.1 0.83 42. Question 42 14 14.3 7.1 14.3 50.0 14.3 3.4 1.28 43. Question 43 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 3.8 0.80 44. Question 44 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 28.6 35.7 3.9 1.00 45. Question 45 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 21.4 7.1 3.3 0.73 46. Question 46 13 46.2 30.8 7.7 7.7 7.7 2.0 1.29 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 49. Question 49 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 461 001L1 AMER REVOLUT, 1763-1789 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 36.7 Sophomore 1 3.3 B 17 56.7 Junior 11 36.7 C 2 6.7 Senior 18 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.3 Studies Program 2 6.7 2 hours 10 33.3 Required by my major 23 76.7 3 hours 15 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 16.7 4 - 5 hours 3 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 3.2 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 3.2 45.2 35.5 16.1 2.6 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 12.9 87.1 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 6.5 38.7 54.8 3.5 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 3.2 29.0 67.7 3.6 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 3.3 56.7 40.0 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 7.4 55.6 37.0 3.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 9.7 45.2 45.2 3.4 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 3.2 41.9 54.8 3.5 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 0.0 19.4 80.6 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 75.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 595 401L1 STUDIES IN HISTORY: CLASSICAL MYSTICISM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nugent, D G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 28.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 42.9 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 5 71.4 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 330 001L1 HIS W RELIG THOUGHT (I) INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Olster, D M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 100.0 Junior 5 50.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 10.0 Required by my major 7 70.0 3 hours 5 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 30.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 9.1 9.1 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.94 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 9 11.1 0.0 22.2 66.7 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 37.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 001L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 33.3 A 1 16.7 Sophomore 3 50.0 B 4 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 16.7 Senior 1 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 83.3 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 5 83.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 12.5 37.5 50.0 0.0 2.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 12.5 0.0 87.5 0.0 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 2.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 12.5 12.5 75.0 0.0 2.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 12.5 12.5 75.0 0.0 2.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 12.5 37.5 3.8 . 38. Question 38 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 4.1 . 39. Question 39 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 3.8 . 40. Question 40 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 25.0 37.5 3.9 . 41. Question 41 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 25.0 37.5 4.0 . 42. Question 42 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 0.0 25.0 3.4 . 43. Question 43 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 12.5 25.0 3.4 . 44. Question 44 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 3.8 . 45. Question 45 8 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 0.0 2.5 . 46. Question 46 8 50.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 1.9 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 002L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 25.0 A 1 14.3 Sophomore 4 50.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 4 57.1 Senior 2 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 4 57.1 2 hours 3 42.9 Required by my major 3 42.9 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 11.1 11.1 77.8 0.0 2.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 11.1 33.3 55.6 0.0 2.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 22.2 33.3 33.3 11.1 2.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 22.2 44.4 22.2 11.1 2.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 22.2 33.3 33.3 11.1 2.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 22.2 44.4 22.2 11.1 2.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 55.6 22.2 22.2 2.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 22.2 22.2 33.3 22.2 2.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 10 10.0 0.0 10.0 40.0 40.0 4.0 1.25 38. Question 38 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 4.5 0.71 39. Question 39 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 3.8 0.92 40. Question 40 9 0.0 22.2 11.1 44.4 22.2 3.7 . 41. Question 41 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 22.2 33.3 3.9 . 42. Question 42 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 33.3 11.1 3.3 . 43. Question 43 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 22.2 11.1 3.2 . 44. Question 44 9 11.1 11.1 22.2 33.3 22.2 3.4 . 45. Question 45 10 30.0 10.0 50.0 10.0 0.0 2.4 1.07 46. Question 46 9 55.6 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 52.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 003L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 16.7 A 1 16.7 Sophomore 3 50.0 B 4 66.7 Junior 2 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 16.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 16.7 Studies Program 5 83.3 2 hours 2 33.3 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 28.6 42.9 14.3 14.3 2.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 60.0 0.0 40.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 57.1 14.3 28.6 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 4.1 . 38. Question 38 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 4.7 . 39. Question 39 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 14.3 42.9 4.0 . 40. Question 40 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 4.6 . 41. Question 41 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 4.7 . 42. Question 42 7 14.3 0.0 14.3 14.3 57.1 4.0 . 43. Question 43 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 14.3 57.1 4.3 . 44. Question 44 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 4.3 . 45. Question 45 7 42.9 28.6 28.6 0.0 0.0 1.9 . 46. Question 46 7 71.4 14.3 0.0 0.0 14.3 1.7 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 36.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 004L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 7.7 A 2 15.4 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 10 76.9 Junior 8 61.5 C 1 7.7 Senior 3 23.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.7 Studies Program 5 38.5 2 hours 6 46.2 Required by my major 8 61.5 3 hours 4 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 6.7 73.3 13.3 2.9 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 40.0 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 20.0 73.3 6.7 2.9 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 26.7 53.3 13.3 2.7 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 33.3 53.3 13.3 2.8 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 33.3 46.7 4.2 0.94 38. Question 38 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 13.3 73.3 4.6 0.74 39. Question 39 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 40.0 40.0 4.1 0.92 40. Question 40 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 26.7 33.3 3.9 0.99 41. Question 41 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 40.0 33.3 4.1 0.80 42. Question 42 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 46.7 20.0 3.8 0.86 43. Question 43 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 46.7 6.7 3.5 0.74 44. Question 44 15 0.0 13.3 20.0 46.7 20.0 3.7 0.96 45. Question 45 15 20.0 20.0 53.3 6.7 0.0 2.5 0.92 46. Question 46 13 69.2 23.1 7.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.65 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 005L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 44.4 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 4 44.4 B 5 55.6 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 11.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 6 66.7 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 2 22.2 3 hours 5 55.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 2.6 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 4.0 0.45 38. Question 38 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 4.5 0.52 39. Question 39 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 3.8 0.87 40. Question 40 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 45.5 36.4 4.1 0.94 41. Question 41 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 4.0 0.45 42. Question 42 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 3.8 0.87 43. Question 43 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 4.0 0.63 44. Question 44 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 4.1 0.70 45. Question 45 11 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 0.0 2.6 0.81 46. Question 46 11 63.6 27.3 9.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.69 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 57.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 006L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 25.0 A 2 25.0 Sophomore 2 25.0 B 5 62.5 Junior 3 37.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 12.5 D 1 12.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 6 75.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 5 62.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 0.36 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 42.9 35.7 21.4 0.0 1.8 0.80 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 35.7 64.3 0.0 2.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 21.4 64.3 7.1 2.7 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 7.1 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 46.2 53.8 0.0 2.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 35.7 64.3 0.0 2.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 0.36 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 36.4 63.6 0.0 2.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 21.4 78.6 0.0 2.8 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 35.7 64.3 0.0 2.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 42.9 42.9 7.1 2.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 0.0 85.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 45.5 45.5 9.1 2.6 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 27.3 72.7 0.0 2.7 0.47 33. Amount of work appropriate 12 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.87 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 20.0 33.3 46.7 0.0 3.3 0.80 38. Question 38 15 0.0 20.0 33.3 40.0 6.7 3.3 0.90 39. Question 39 15 0.0 26.7 26.7 40.0 6.7 3.3 0.96 40. Question 40 15 0.0 20.0 33.3 26.7 20.0 3.5 1.06 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 35.7 14.3 3.6 0.74 42. Question 42 15 6.7 13.3 46.7 33.3 0.0 3.1 0.88 43. Question 43 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 35.7 7.1 3.3 0.99 44. Question 44 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 33.3 26.7 3.9 0.83 45. Question 45 15 53.3 26.7 20.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.82 46. Question 46 14 78.6 7.1 7.1 7.1 0.0 1.4 0.94 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 534 001L1 RUSSIA IN 20TH CENTURY I CENTURY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 47.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 52.6 Junior 5 26.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 47.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 26.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 21.1 Required by my major 12 63.2 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 36.8 4 - 5 hours 7 36.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 1 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 3.7 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 47.6 33.3 19.0 2.7 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 5.0 15.0 80.0 3.8 0.55. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 285 001L1 HIST OF RUSSIA TO 1825 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rowland, Daniel B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.2 A 7 30.4 Sophomore 2 8.3 B 14 60.9 Junior 9 37.5 C 1 4.3 Senior 12 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 30.4 Studies Program 4 17.4 2 hours 6 26.1 Required by my major 17 73.9 3 hours 9 39.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.7 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 4.0 4.0 48.0 44.0 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 3.8 0.0 53.8 42.3 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 3.8 7.7 46.2 42.3 3.3 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 3.8 11.5 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 3.8 3.8 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 11.5 30.8 53.8 3.3 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 26.3 47.4 21.1 2.8 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 3.8 3.8 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 3.8 15.4 46.2 34.6 3.1 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 7.7 50.0 38.5 3.2 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 3.8 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 650 001S1 RDGS SPEC TOPS HISTORY: RACE IN EARLY AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Smith, Daniel B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 14.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 37.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 62.5 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 5 62.5 8 or more hours 2 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 001L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 57.1 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 1 14.3 B 1 14.3 Junior 1 14.3 C 2 28.6 Senior 1 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 71.4 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 5 71.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 40.0 50.0 10.0 2.7 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 2.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 44.4 55.6 0.0 2.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 90.0 0.0 2.9 0.32 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 2.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 77.8 22.2 0.0 2.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 40.0 50.0 10.0 2.7 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 20.0 50.0 4.2 0.92 38. Question 38 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 10.0 60.0 4.3 0.95 39. Question 39 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 4.0 0.82 40. Question 40 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 4.1 0.88 41. Question 41 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 4.1 0.88 42. Question 42 10 10.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 3.7 1.25 43. Question 43 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 4.1 0.74 44. Question 44 10 20.0 0.0 10.0 50.0 20.0 3.5 1.43 45. Question 45 10 10.0 60.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.63 46. Question 46 10 30.0 40.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 2.1 0.99 Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 002L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 33.3 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 4 44.4 B 5 55.6 Junior 1 11.1 C 2 22.2 Senior 1 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 4 44.4 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 5 55.6 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 7.7 0.0 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.88 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 7.7 15.4 38.5 38.5 3.1 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 30.8 30.8 38.5 3.1 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 23.1 30.8 38.5 3.0 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 16.7 8.3 75.0 3.6 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 23.1 61.5 4.5 0.78 38. Question 38 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 4.7 0.63 39. Question 39 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 4.6 0.65 40. Question 40 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 4.5 0.66 41. Question 41 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 4.5 0.52 42. Question 42 13 0.0 15.4 15.4 23.1 46.2 4.0 1.15 43. Question 43 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 4.5 0.66 44. Question 44 13 0.0 7.7 0.0 61.5 30.8 4.2 0.80 45. Question 45 13 30.8 23.1 15.4 15.4 15.4 2.6 1.50 46. Question 46 13 46.2 23.1 15.4 0.0 15.4 2.2 1.46 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 003L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 3 33.3 B 5 55.6 Junior 2 22.2 C 1 11.1 Senior 4 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 22.2 Studies Program 6 66.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 33.3 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 15.4 61.5 15.4 2.8 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 23.1 46.2 23.1 2.8 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 23.1 76.9 0.0 2.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 7.7 7.7 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.86 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 25.0 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 8.3 8.3 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 16.7 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 4.4 0.65 38. Question 38 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 4.6 0.65 39. Question 39 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 4.4 0.65 40. Question 40 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 4.3 0.75 41. Question 41 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 4.5 0.66 42. Question 42 13 7.7 0.0 7.7 46.2 38.5 4.1 1.12 43. Question 43 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 4.3 0.63 44. Question 44 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 30.8 46.2 4.2 0.83 45. Question 45 13 15.4 30.8 38.5 15.4 0.0 2.5 0.97 46. Question 46 13 46.2 30.8 7.7 7.7 7.7 2.0 1.29 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 72.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 004L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 25.0 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 4 33.3 B 8 66.7 Junior 4 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 6 50.0 2 hours 6 50.0 Required by my major 4 33.3 3 hours 5 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 16.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 8.3 8.3 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 36.4 63.6 0.0 2.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.0 2.9 0.29 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 3.8 0.58 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 4.2 0.70 39. Question 39 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 42.9 7.1 3.5 0.76 40. Question 40 14 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 0.0 3.1 0.86 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 3.9 0.73 42. Question 42 13 0.0 23.1 23.1 53.8 0.0 3.3 0.85 43. Question 43 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 3.8 0.73 44. Question 44 14 7.1 0.0 28.6 50.0 14.3 3.6 1.01 45. Question 45 14 42.9 35.7 14.3 7.1 0.0 1.9 0.95 46. Question 46 14 78.6 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.43 Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 005L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 33.3 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 3 33.3 B 3 33.3 Junior 2 22.2 C 1 11.1 Senior 1 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 33.3 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 5 55.6 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 50.0 30.0 20.0 2.7 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 8.3 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 4.3 0.78 38. Question 38 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 4.3 0.65 39. Question 39 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 4.3 0.75 40. Question 40 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 41.7 33.3 4.1 0.79 41. Question 41 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 16.7 58.3 4.3 0.89 42. Question 42 12 0.0 16.7 8.3 41.7 33.3 3.9 1.08 43. Question 43 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 4.3 0.87 44. Question 44 12 8.3 0.0 8.3 41.7 41.7 4.1 1.16 45. Question 45 12 0.0 58.3 41.7 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.51 46. Question 46 12 16.7 41.7 25.0 16.7 0.0 2.4 1.00 Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 006L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 71.4 A 1 14.3 Sophomore 2 28.6 B 6 85.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 5 71.4 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 4.3 . 38. Question 38 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 4.3 . 39. Question 39 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 4.1 . 40. Question 40 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 22.2 44.4 4.1 . 41. Question 41 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 4.2 . 42. Question 42 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 11.1 44.4 3.9 . 43. Question 43 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 4.2 . 44. Question 44 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 4.2 . 45. Question 45 9 11.1 66.7 22.2 0.0 0.0 2.1 . 46. Question 46 9 44.4 44.4 0.0 11.1 0.0 1.8 . Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 64.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 520 001L1 ERA OF THE REFORMATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 42.9 Junior 3 21.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 35.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 35.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.1 Pass or Audit 2 14.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 7 50.0 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 7 50.0 4 - 5 hours 5 35.7 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 13.3 73.3 3.6 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 6.7 86.7 3.8 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 706 001S1 SEM IN MEDIEVAL HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 80.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 20.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 3 60.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 001L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 22.2 A 5 27.8 Sophomore 6 33.3 B 11 61.1 Junior 3 16.7 C 2 11.1 Senior 5 27.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 33.3 Studies Program 12 70.6 2 hours 9 50.0 Required by my major 3 17.6 3 hours 2 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 10.5 10.5 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 21.1 68.4 10.5 2.9 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 5.3 73.7 15.8 3.0 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 10.5 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 21.1 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 22.2 55.6 16.7 2.8 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 5.6 11.1 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 11.1 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 47.4 26.3 15.8 2.5 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 0.0 73.7 21.1 3.1 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 6.3 0.0 12.5 43.8 37.5 4.1 1.06 38. Question 38 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 4.3 0.68 39. Question 39 16 12.5 0.0 37.5 43.8 6.3 3.3 1.08 40. Question 40 16 6.3 12.5 31.3 43.8 6.3 3.3 1.01 41. Question 41 16 6.3 6.3 12.5 50.0 25.0 3.8 1.11 42. Question 42 16 12.5 6.3 50.0 18.8 12.5 3.1 1.15 43. Question 43 16 6.3 0.0 31.3 31.3 31.3 3.8 1.11 44. Question 44 16 12.5 25.0 6.3 37.5 18.8 3.3 1.39 45. Question 45 16 12.5 37.5 50.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.72 46. Question 46 16 62.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 0.0 1.8 1.13 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 002L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 100.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 28.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 14.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 6 85.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 12.5 25.0 62.5 0.0 2.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 71.4 28.6 0.0 2.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 0.0 87.5 0.0 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 12.5 12.5 75.0 0.0 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 3.4 . 38. Question 38 7 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 0.0 2.7 . 39. Question 39 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 0.0 3.0 . 40. Question 40 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 16.7 16.7 3.5 . 41. Question 41 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 0.0 14.3 3.1 . 42. Question 42 7 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 0.0 2.7 . 43. Question 43 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 0.0 3.3 . 44. Question 44 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 0.0 3.0 . 45. Question 45 7 14.3 57.1 28.6 0.0 0.0 2.1 . 46. Question 46 7 42.9 0.0 28.6 28.6 0.0 2.4 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 42.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 003L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 27.3 A 1 9.1 Sophomore 6 54.5 B 6 54.5 Junior 1 9.1 C 4 36.4 Senior 1 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 9 81.8 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 18.2 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 18.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 18.2 27.3 45.5 9.1 2.5 0.93 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 55.6 33.3 11.1 2.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 80.0 20.0 0.0 2.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 14.3 71.4 14.3 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 7.1 0.0 64.3 28.6 4.1 0.77 38. Question 38 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 35.7 21.4 3.7 0.91 39. Question 39 14 0.0 14.3 21.4 50.0 14.3 3.6 0.93 40. Question 40 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 3.9 0.62 41. Question 41 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 4.2 0.73 42. Question 42 14 7.1 7.1 35.7 50.0 0.0 3.3 0.91 43. Question 43 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 4.3 0.61 44. Question 44 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 4.1 0.73 45. Question 45 14 28.6 21.4 42.9 7.1 0.0 2.3 0.99 46. Question 46 13 69.2 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.48 Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 004L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 8.3 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 7 58.3 B 3 25.0 Junior 2 16.7 C 2 16.7 Senior 2 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 11 91.7 2 hours 8 66.7 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 23.1 46.2 30.8 3.1 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 16.7 8.3 41.7 33.3 2.9 1.08 14. Encouraged class participation 12 8.3 50.0 25.0 16.7 2.5 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 16.7 41.7 33.3 3.0 0.95 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 23.1 30.8 46.2 0.0 2.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 23.1 30.8 38.5 3.0 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 54.5 27.3 18.2 2.6 0.81 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 35. Instructor helped with my problems 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 30.8 46.2 4.2 0.99 38. Question 38 13 7.7 0.0 30.8 38.5 23.1 3.7 1.11 39. Question 39 13 0.0 7.7 7.7 38.5 46.2 4.2 0.93 40. Question 40 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 4.3 0.75 41. Question 41 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 4.4 0.79 42. Question 42 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 4.0 0.85 43. Question 43 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 4.5 0.52 44. Question 44 12 8.3 0.0 8.3 41.7 41.7 4.1 1.16 45. Question 45 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 15.4 7.7 3.0 1.00 46. Question 46 12 58.3 33.3 8.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.67 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 68.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 005L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 100.0 A 3 21.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 4 28.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 14.3 Studies Program 12 85.7 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 21.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 5.3 0.0 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 21.1 73.7 3.7 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 5.3 15.8 73.7 3.6 0.84 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 9 11.1 0.0 11.1 77.8 3.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 15.8 78.9 4.7 0.56 38. Question 38 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 4.8 0.37 39. Question 39 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 4.9 0.32 40. Question 40 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 21.1 73.7 4.7 0.58 41. Question 41 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 10.5 84.2 4.8 0.54 42. Question 42 19 5.3 15.8 5.3 21.1 52.6 4.0 1.33 43. Question 43 19 0.0 5.3 5.3 15.8 73.7 4.6 0.84 44. Question 44 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 5.3 78.9 4.6 0.76 45. Question 45 19 5.3 26.3 31.6 10.5 26.3 3.3 1.28 46. Question 46 19 10.5 36.8 15.8 5.3 31.6 3.1 1.49 47. Question 47 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 4.7 . 48. Question 48 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 4.8 . Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 82.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 006L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 38.5 A 2 15.4 Sophomore 6 46.2 B 7 53.8 Junior 2 15.4 C 4 30.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 23.1 Studies Program 9 69.2 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 15.4 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 38.5 38.5 23.1 2.8 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 2.8 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 42.9 35.7 21.4 2.8 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 23.1 46.2 30.8 3.1 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 55.6 33.3 11.1 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 35.7 21.4 3.8 0.80 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 28.6 35.7 4.0 0.88 39. Question 39 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 28.6 21.4 3.6 0.93 40. Question 40 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 3.7 0.73 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 3.9 0.73 42. Question 42 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 14.3 14.3 3.3 0.91 43. Question 43 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 28.6 21.4 3.7 0.83 44. Question 44 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 14.3 21.4 3.5 0.94 45. Question 45 14 7.1 28.6 50.0 0.0 14.3 2.9 1.10 46. Question 46 14 35.7 28.6 7.1 14.3 14.3 2.4 1.50 47. Question 47 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 70.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 007L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 17 100.0 A 1 5.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 58.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 6 35.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 11 68.8 2 hours 8 47.1 Required by my major 3 18.8 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 38.9 50.0 11.1 2.7 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 11.1 33.3 50.0 5.6 2.5 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 61.1 33.3 0.0 2.3 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 5.6 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 27.8 38.9 33.3 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 56.3 37.5 0.0 2.3 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 66.7 27.8 0.0 2.2 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 18 50.0 11.1 16.7 16.7 5.6 2.2 1.38 38. Question 38 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 3.7 0.77 39. Question 39 16 50.0 12.5 18.8 12.5 6.3 2.1 1.36 40. Question 40 17 35.3 52.9 0.0 11.8 0.0 1.9 0.93 41. Question 41 17 11.8 23.5 35.3 17.6 11.8 2.9 1.20 42. Question 42 18 22.2 38.9 27.8 11.1 0.0 2.3 0.96 43. Question 43 18 5.6 16.7 44.4 27.8 5.6 3.1 0.96 44. Question 44 18 38.9 22.2 16.7 16.7 5.6 2.3 1.32 45. Question 45 18 5.6 55.6 38.9 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.59 46. Question 46 15 66.7 26.7 0.0 6.7 0.0 1.5 0.83 Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 008L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 9.1 A 2 18.2 Sophomore 8 72.7 B 8 72.7 Junior 2 18.2 C 1 9.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 45.5 Studies Program 10 90.9 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 23.1 46.2 23.1 2.8 0.90 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 23.1 38.5 30.8 2.9 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 8.3 8.3 75.0 8.3 2.8 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 4.3 0.62 38. Question 38 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 4.4 0.51 39. Question 39 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 4.3 0.65 40. Question 40 12 8.3 8.3 16.7 50.0 16.7 3.6 1.16 41. Question 41 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 4.3 0.78 42. Question 42 11 9.1 0.0 27.3 54.5 9.1 3.5 1.04 43. Question 43 12 0.0 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 4.3 0.89 44. Question 44 12 8.3 8.3 33.3 33.3 16.7 3.4 1.16 45. Question 45 12 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.87 46. Question 46 11 54.5 36.4 9.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.69 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 009L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 19 100.0 A 6 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 38.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 5 27.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 16 88.9 2 hours 4 21.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 9 47.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.1 4 - 5 hours 5 26.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 19 10.5 10.5 42.1 36.8 3.1 0.97 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 21.1 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 4.8 0.42 38. Question 38 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 4.8 0.37 39. Question 39 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 4.8 0.37 40. Question 40 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 15.8 78.9 4.7 0.56 41. Question 41 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 15.8 78.9 4.7 0.56 42. Question 42 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 4.7 0.48 43. Question 43 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 4.8 0.37 44. Question 44 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 15.8 78.9 4.7 0.56 45. Question 45 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 5.3 15.8 3.2 0.96 46. Question 46 19 5.3 42.1 36.8 0.0 15.8 2.8 1.13 47. Question 47 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.5 . Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 86.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 010L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 13.3 A 2 14.3 Sophomore 10 66.7 B 7 50.0 Junior 2 13.3 C 5 35.7 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 33.3 Studies Program 13 100.0 2 hours 2 13.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 7 46.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 3.0 0.38 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 6.7 33.3 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 40.0 40.0 13.3 2.6 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 46.7 46.7 6.7 2.6 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 6.7 6.7 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 50.0 33.3 8.3 2.4 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 13.3 73.3 13.3 0.0 2.0 0.53 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 13.3 26.7 33.3 26.7 2.7 1.03. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 1.07 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 21.4 64.3 4.5 0.76 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 4.6 0.76 39. Question 39 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 21.4 57.1 4.4 0.84 40. Question 40 14 0.0 14.3 7.1 50.0 28.6 3.9 1.00 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 4.2 0.80 42. Question 42 14 0.0 21.4 21.4 50.0 7.1 3.4 0.94 43. Question 43 14 0.0 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 4.2 0.89 44. Question 44 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 28.6 35.7 3.9 1.00 45. Question 45 14 21.4 42.9 35.7 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.77 46. Question 46 14 78.6 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.43 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 011L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 7 77.8 B 7 77.8 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 22.2 Studies Program 8 88.9 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 1 11.1 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 25.0 16.7 58.3 3.3 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 8.3 0.0 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 8.3 16.7 75.0 0.0 2.7 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 41.7 41.7 8.3 2.5 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 27.3 72.7 0.0 2.7 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 4.3 0.65 38. Question 38 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 4.3 0.62 39. Question 39 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 4.2 0.72 40. Question 40 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 0.0 3.5 0.67 41. Question 41 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 3.9 0.51 42. Question 42 12 8.3 25.0 25.0 41.7 0.0 3.0 1.04 43. Question 43 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 3.8 0.72 44. Question 44 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 41.7 8.3 3.4 1.00 45. Question 45 12 16.7 50.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.72 46. Question 46 11 81.8 9.1 9.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.65 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 012L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 12.5 A 3 18.8 Sophomore 12 75.0 B 10 62.5 Junior 1 6.3 C 3 18.8 Senior 1 6.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 15 93.8 2 hours 2 12.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 10.5 31.6 52.6 3.3 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 21.1 68.4 3.6 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 36.8 26.3 31.6 2.8 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 4.8 0.42 38. Question 38 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 4.7 0.48 39. Question 39 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 15.8 78.9 4.7 0.56 40. Question 40 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 4.7 0.45 41. Question 41 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 4.8 0.42 42. Question 42 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 4.5 0.51 43. Question 43 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 4.7 0.48 44. Question 44 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 4.7 0.45 45. Question 45 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 10.5 10.5 3.3 0.67 46. Question 46 17 47.1 23.5 5.9 17.6 5.9 2.1 1.36 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.5 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 037L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 100.0 A 3 23.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 30.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 6 46.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 8 61.5 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 6 46.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 15.4 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 85.7 7.1 3.0 0.39 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 21.4 28.6 50.0 3.3 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 2.8 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 2.9 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 4.4 0.76 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 4.4 0.76 39. Question 39 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 4.1 0.86 40. Question 40 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 4.2 0.80 41. Question 41 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 4.4 0.76 42. Question 42 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 4.4 0.76 43. Question 43 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 4.4 0.76 44. Question 44 14 0.0 14.3 14.3 21.4 50.0 4.1 1.14 45. Question 45 14 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 0.0 3.1 0.36 46. Question 46 14 57.1 28.6 0.0 14.3 0.0 1.7 1.07 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 038L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 75.0 A 1 8.3 Sophomore 1 8.3 B 8 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 25.0 Senior 2 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 10 83.3 2 hours 5 45.5 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 0.0 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 14 7.1 7.1 35.7 50.0 3.3 0.91 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 7.7 7.7 76.9 7.7 2.8 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 16.7 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.90 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 21.4 35.7 21.4 21.4 2.4 1.09 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 4.5 0.64 38. Question 38 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 4.6 0.51 39. Question 39 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 4.5 0.64 40. Question 40 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 4.3 0.72 41. Question 41 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 4.5 0.64 42. Question 42 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 26.7 33.3 3.9 0.99 43. Question 43 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 4.6 0.51 44. Question 44 15 0.0 13.3 0.0 46.7 40.0 4.1 0.99 45. Question 45 15 20.0 46.7 26.7 6.7 0.0 2.2 0.86 46. Question 46 14 35.7 42.9 14.3 7.1 0.0 1.9 0.92 47. Question 47 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 464 001L1 CIV WAR7RECON, 1860-1877 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 37.3 Sophomore 5 10.0 B 21 41.2 Junior 15 30.0 C 10 19.6 Senior 28 56.0 D 1 2.0 Graduate 1 2.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 8.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 34.0 Required by my major 32 64.0 3 hours 21 42.0 Other (e.g. elective) 18 36.0 4 - 5 hours 8 16.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 56 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 55 0.0 7.3 49.1 43.6 3.4 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 56 1.8 3.6 44.6 50.0 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 56 0.0 0.0 48.2 51.8 3.5 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 56 0.0 1.8 50.0 48.2 3.5 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 56 0.0 3.6 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 56 0.0 3.6 53.6 42.9 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 55 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 56 0.0 3.6 17.9 78.6 3.8 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 56 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 47 0.0 2.1 34.0 63.8 3.6 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 55 1.8 1.8 36.4 60.0 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 56 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 14. Encouraged class participation 56 1.8 8.9 35.7 53.6 3.4 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 47 0.0 2.1 48.9 48.9 3.5 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 50 0.0 2.0 50.0 48.0 3.5 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 47 0.0 4.3 44.7 51.1 3.5 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 55 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 53 0.0 1.9 37.7 60.4 3.6 0.53 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 55 0.0 1.8 25.5 72.7 3.7 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 54 0.0 1.9 13.0 85.2 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 79 Number of forms scanned = 56 Number of forms with at least one student response = 56 Percent completed = 70.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 007L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 50.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 2 20.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 3 30.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 50.0 Studies Program 5 50.0 2 hours 1 10.0 Required by my major 5 50.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 23.1 46.2 30.8 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 1.04 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 46.2 38.5 15.4 2.7 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 23.1 46.2 23.1 2.8 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 30.8 23.1 38.5 2.9 1.04 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 15.4 30.8 38.5 15.4 2.5 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 23.1 30.8 38.5 3.0 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 4.7 . 38. Question 38 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 4.7 . 39. Question 39 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 4.7 . 40. Question 40 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 41. Question 41 6 16.7 0.0 0.0 16.7 66.7 4.2 . 42. Question 42 6 33.3 0.0 16.7 16.7 33.3 3.2 . 43. Question 43 6 16.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 50.0 4.0 . 44. Question 44 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 4.7 . 45. Question 45 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 0.0 2.7 . 46. Question 46 5 80.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 008L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 60.0 A 2 13.3 Sophomore 5 33.3 B 5 33.3 Junior 1 6.7 C 7 46.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 6.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 46.7 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 3 20.0 Required by my major 2 13.3 3 hours 2 13.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 2 13.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 6.7 13.3 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.80 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 15.4 7.7 53.8 23.1 2.8 0.99 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 13.3 13.3 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.99 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 20.0 60.0 13.3 2.8 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 26.7 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 33.3 26.7 40.0 0.0 2.1 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 35.7 57.1 0.0 2.5 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 35.7 35.7 28.6 0.0 1.9 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 15 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 9.1 36.4 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 53.3 40.0 6.7 2.5 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 57.1 28.6 7.1 2.4 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 2.8 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 13.3 46.7 26.7 13.3 2.4 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 13.3 40.0 33.3 13.3 2.5 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 40.0 26.7 20.0 13.3 2.1 1.10. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 4.3 0.62 38. Question 38 15 0.0 6.7 6.7 40.0 46.7 4.3 0.88 39. Question 39 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 4.4 0.51 40. Question 40 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 4.1 0.70 41. Question 41 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 4.4 0.63 42. Question 42 14 7.1 0.0 28.6 57.1 7.1 3.6 0.94 43. Question 43 15 0.0 6.7 6.7 66.7 20.0 4.0 0.76 44. Question 44 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 40.0 26.7 3.9 0.92 45. Question 45 15 26.7 40.0 26.7 6.7 0.0 2.1 0.92 46. Question 46 15 73.3 13.3 0.0 13.3 0.0 1.5 1.06 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 009L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 10.0 A 3 30.0 Sophomore 5 50.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 3 30.0 C 2 20.0 Senior 1 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 70.0 Studies Program 6 60.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 4 40.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.82 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 23.1 7.7 53.8 15.4 2.6 1.04 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 7.7 0.0 53.8 38.5 3.2 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 0.0 53.8 38.5 3.2 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 15.4 7.7 46.2 30.8 2.9 1.04 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 30.8 7.7 46.2 15.4 2.5 1.13 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 16.7 0.0 58.3 25.0 2.9 1.00 11. Was available for consultation 12 16.7 8.3 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.97 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 15.4 7.7 46.2 30.8 2.9 1.04 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 38.5 15.4 30.8 15.4 2.2 1.17 14. Encouraged class participation 12 33.3 41.7 25.0 0.0 1.9 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 15.4 23.1 53.8 7.7 2.5 0.88 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 23.1 23.1 38.5 15.4 2.5 1.05 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 23.1 30.8 38.5 7.7 2.3 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 15.4 7.7 53.8 23.1 2.8 0.99 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 23.1 23.1 46.2 7.7 2.4 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 23.1 30.8 38.5 7.7 2.3 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 30.8 15.4 30.8 23.1 2.5 1.20. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 15.4 46.2 4.0 1.08 38. Question 38 13 0.0 15.4 23.1 38.5 23.1 3.7 1.03 39. Question 39 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 15.4 53.8 4.2 0.93 40. Question 40 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 30.8 46.2 4.2 0.83 41. Question 41 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 4.0 0.82 42. Question 42 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 7.7 46.2 3.9 1.12 43. Question 43 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 30.8 38.5 4.1 0.86 44. Question 44 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 4.2 0.80 45. Question 45 13 38.5 30.8 23.1 0.0 7.7 2.1 1.19 46. Question 46 12 66.7 8.3 8.3 16.7 0.0 1.8 1.22 Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 010L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 18.2 A 3 27.3 Sophomore 7 63.6 B 3 27.3 Junior 1 9.1 C 5 45.5 Senior 1 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 45.5 2 hours 5 45.5 Required by my major 6 54.5 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 18.2 0.0 45.5 36.4 3.0 1.10 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 9.1 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 45.5 27.3 18.2 2.5 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 18.2 36.4 27.3 18.2 2.5 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 10 30.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 2.0 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 0.0 77.8 11.1 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 11.1 11.1 77.8 0.0 2.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 18.2 45.5 27.3 9.1 2.3 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 4.5 0.69 38. Question 38 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 4.4 0.67 39. Question 39 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 4.2 0.75 40. Question 40 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 4.2 0.60 41. Question 41 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 4.4 0.81 42. Question 42 11 9.1 9.1 36.4 27.3 18.2 3.4 1.21 43. Question 43 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 4.0 0.89 44. Question 44 11 9.1 9.1 18.2 27.3 36.4 3.7 1.35 45. Question 45 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 0.0 2.9 0.54 46. Question 46 11 63.6 9.1 18.2 9.1 0.0 1.7 1.10 Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 61.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 011L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 4 40.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 4 40.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 2 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 2 20.0 2 hours 5 50.0 Required by my major 7 70.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 7.1 7.1 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 7.1 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 14.3 21.4 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 35.7 21.4 35.7 7.1 2.1 1.03 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 15.4 23.1 53.8 7.7 2.5 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 28.6 28.6 35.7 7.1 2.2 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 13 46.2 38.5 15.4 0.0 1.7 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 21.4 64.3 7.1 2.7 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 14.3 71.4 7.1 2.8 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 33.3 50.0 8.3 2.6 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 42.9 42.9 7.1 2.5 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 14.3 28.6 50.0 7.1 2.5 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 21.4 42.9 28.6 7.1 2.2 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 4.8 0.43 38. Question 38 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 4.4 0.74 39. Question 39 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 4.6 0.51 40. Question 40 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 4.6 0.51 41. Question 41 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 4.4 0.67 42. Question 42 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 4.0 0.78 43. Question 43 14 0.0 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 4.2 0.89 44. Question 44 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 4.1 0.66 45. Question 45 14 7.1 35.7 35.7 21.4 0.0 2.7 0.91 46. Question 46 14 78.6 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.43 48. Question 48 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 012L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 11.1 A 1 11.1 Sophomore 4 44.4 B 5 55.6 Junior 1 11.1 C 3 33.3 Senior 3 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 33.3 2 hours 5 55.6 Required by my major 6 66.7 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 10.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 2.6 0.84 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 10.0 40.0 20.0 30.0 2.7 1.06 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 30.0 30.0 30.0 10.0 2.2 1.03 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 30.0 20.0 40.0 10.0 2.3 1.06 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 30.0 10.0 50.0 10.0 2.4 1.07 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 50.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 1.9 1.10 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 20.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 2.5 1.08 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 50.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 1.9 1.10 14. Encouraged class participation 10 60.0 20.0 10.0 10.0 1.7 1.06 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 0.84 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 10.0 60.0 30.0 0.0 2.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 30.0 50.0 20.0 0.0 1.9 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 30.0 20.0 40.0 10.0 2.3 1.06 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 40.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 1.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 60.0 10.0 10.0 20.0 1.9 1.29 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 50.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 1.9 1.10. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 40.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 2.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 40.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 2.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 4.1 0.74 38. Question 38 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 30.0 50.0 4.3 0.82 39. Question 39 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 10.0 3.5 0.97 40. Question 40 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 30.0 30.0 3.7 1.16 41. Question 41 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 20.0 50.0 4.2 0.92 42. Question 42 10 10.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 10.0 3.0 1.15 43. Question 43 10 10.0 0.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 3.7 1.16 44. Question 44 10 10.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 3.1 1.37 45. Question 45 10 50.0 20.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.92 46. Question 46 10 60.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 1.8 1.32 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 52.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 270 001L1 EARLY MIDDLE AGES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 21.1 Sophomore 9 45.0 B 11 57.9 Junior 5 25.0 C 3 15.8 Senior 6 30.0 D 1 5.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 45.0 Studies Program 9 45.0 2 hours 6 30.0 Required by my major 5 25.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 30.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 19.0 33.3 33.3 14.3 2.4 0.98 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 20.0 20.0 50.0 10.0 2.5 0.95 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 4.5 22.7 50.0 22.7 2.9 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 22.7 40.9 31.8 3.0 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 9.1 22.7 36.4 31.8 2.9 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 13.6 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 6.7 13.3 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 13.3 6.7 40.0 40.0 3.1 1.03 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 14.3 7.1 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 15.0 5.0 45.0 35.0 3.0 1.03 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 15.0 20.0 35.0 30.0 2.8 1.06 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 4.5 31.8 36.4 27.3 2.9 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 22.7 36.4 40.9 3.2 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 57.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 512 001L1 MEDIEVAL INSTITUTIONS TO THE MID TENTH CENTURY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 66.7 Junior 2 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 7 58.3 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 33.3 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 1 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 202 001L1 HIST BRIT PEOPLE TO REST INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whitlock, Tammy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 61.1 Sophomore 9 52.9 B 4 22.2 Junior 5 29.4 C 3 16.7 Senior 3 17.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 44.4 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 13 76.5 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 3 17.6 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 0.0 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************