****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 300 006L1 QUANT ANALY IN OPS MGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chung, Chen H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 64.3 Sophomore 3 7.0 B 15 35.7 Junior 16 37.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 24 55.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 62.8 Studies Program 1 2.3 2 hours 12 27.9 Required by my major 40 93.0 3 hours 1 2.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 4.7 4 - 5 hours 3 7.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 48 0.0 0.0 39.6 60.4 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 30.4 26.1 26.1 17.4 2.3 1.09 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 2.9 8.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 48 0.0 2.1 45.8 52.1 3.5 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 2.4 47.6 50.0 3.5 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 2.6 12.8 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 48 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 48 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 45 0.0 2.2 37.8 60.0 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 48 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 4.2 16.7 45.8 33.3 3.1 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 47 0.0 10.6 55.3 34.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 47 0.0 2.1 48.9 48.9 3.5 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 47 0.0 2.1 48.9 48.9 3.5 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 0.0 0.0 52.1 47.9 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 8.9 28.9 33.3 28.9 2.8 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 48 2.1 18.8 52.1 27.1 3.0 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 48 0.0 2.1 39.6 58.3 3.6 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 96 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 48 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 406 001L1 PRODUC/INVENTORY CONTROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chung, Chen H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 91.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 8.7 Junior 4 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 37.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 45.8 Required by my major 24 100.0 3 hours 4 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 13.0 21.7 30.4 34.8 2.9 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 8.0 0.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.86 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 11.5 88.5 3.9 0.33 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 3.7 3.7 29.6 63.0 3.5 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 3.7 40.7 55.6 3.5 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 4.0 4.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 3.7 0.0 59.3 37.0 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 3.7 0.0 55.6 40.7 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 11.1 51.9 37.0 3.3 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 7.4 33.3 59.3 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 3.7 18.5 77.8 3.7 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 56.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DIS 450 001L1 DECISION ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrod, Steve ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 43.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 36.7 Junior 2 6.7 C 6 20.0 Senior 28 93.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 13.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 26.7 Required by my major 28 96.6 3 hours 7 23.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.4 4 - 5 hours 10 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 13.3 43.3 40.0 3.3 2.3 0.76 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 64.0 24.0 12.0 0.0 1.5 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 16.7 26.7 50.0 6.7 2.5 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 6.7 43.3 46.7 3.3 2.5 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 41.4 34.5 24.1 0.0 1.8 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 10.3 24.1 55.2 10.3 2.7 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 3.6 3.6 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 13.3 50.0 33.3 3.3 2.3 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 40.0 40.0 16.7 3.3 1.8 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 3.3 26.7 46.7 23.3 2.9 0.80 11. Was available for consultation 28 10.7 17.9 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.84 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 23.3 23.3 50.0 3.3 2.3 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 30.0 40.0 23.3 6.7 2.1 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 30 16.7 20.0 53.3 10.0 2.6 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 10.7 42.9 42.9 3.6 2.4 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 6.7 40.0 46.7 6.7 2.5 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 6.9 34.5 55.2 3.4 2.6 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 6.7 50.0 40.0 3.3 2.4 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 16.7 46.7 33.3 3.3 2.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 22.6 54.8 19.4 3.2 2.0 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 45.2 41.9 9.7 3.2 1.7 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 66.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 621 401L1 BUSINESS EXPERT SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holsapple, Clyde W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 38.9 Required by my major 12 66.7 3 hours 3 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 33.3 4 - 5 hours 3 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 26.3 68.4 3.6 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 26.3 63.2 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 21.1 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 76.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 623 001L1 BUS DECISION SUPPORT SYS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holsapple, Clyde W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 92.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 14 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 10 71.4 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 28.6 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 33.3 20.0 46.7 3.1 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 390 001L1 SP TOPS DIS:ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS AND DESIGNS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lee-Post, Anita ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 5 50.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 50.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 38.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 622 001L1 BUS DATA SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lee-Post, Anita ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 88.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 11.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 17 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 12 70.6 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 5 29.4 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 753 001S1 SEM MANAGEMENT SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Muralidhar, K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 14.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 3 42.9 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 57.1 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 001L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pakath, Ramakrishnan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 22.7 Junior 5 22.7 C 2 9.1 Senior 17 77.3 D 1 4.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 40.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 9 40.9 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 13 59.1 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 4.2 0.0 66.7 29.2 3.2 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 12.5 45.8 37.5 3.2 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 8.3 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 16.7 54.2 25.0 3.0 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 4.2 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 8.3 58.3 29.2 3.1 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 4.2 79.2 12.5 3.0 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 8.3 0.0 62.5 29.2 3.1 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 20.8 45.8 29.2 3.0 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 4.2 0.0 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 24 4.2 0.0 66.7 29.2 3.2 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 4.2 4.2 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 30.4 34.8 30.4 2.9 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 24 8.3 16.7 54.2 20.8 2.9 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 10.5 26.3 52.6 10.5 2.6 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 17.4 69.6 8.7 2.8 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 13.6 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 8.3 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 39.1 39.1 17.4 2.7 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 20.8 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 24 4.2 0.0 45.8 50.0 0.0 3.4 0.72 38. Question 38 24 8.3 0.0 29.2 62.5 0.0 3.5 0.88 39. Question 39 24 4.2 4.2 25.0 66.7 0.0 3.5 0.78 40. Question 40 24 4.2 8.3 45.8 41.7 0.0 3.3 0.79 41. Question 41 24 4.2 0.0 50.0 45.8 0.0 3.4 0.71 42. Question 42 24 4.2 0.0 33.3 62.5 0.0 3.5 0.72 43. Question 43 23 8.7 13.0 52.2 26.1 0.0 3.0 0.88 44. Question 44 23 8.7 17.4 56.5 17.4 0.0 2.8 0.83 Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 002L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pakath, Ramakrishnan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 8 40.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 45.0 Required by my major 12 63.2 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 36.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 5.0 15.0 65.0 15.0 2.9 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 31.6 57.9 5.3 2.6 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 20 10.0 30.0 55.0 5.0 2.6 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 21.4 71.4 0.0 2.6 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 27.8 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 42.1 57.9 0.0 2.6 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 25.0 70.0 0.0 2.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 20 0.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 0.0 3.7 0.59 38. Question 38 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 0.0 3.6 0.60 39. Question 39 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 3.7 0.47 40. Question 40 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 3.4 0.67 41. Question 41 20 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 3.4 0.82 42. Question 42 20 0.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 0.0 3.7 0.57 43. Question 43 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 0.0 3.2 0.70 44. Question 44 20 10.0 40.0 35.0 15.0 0.0 2.6 0.89 Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 60.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 003L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Santhanam, Radhika ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 40.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 54.5 Junior 9 40.9 C 1 4.5 Senior 13 59.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 50.0 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 8 36.4 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 13 59.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 8.7 13.0 56.5 21.7 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 8.7 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 13.0 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 26.1 34.8 39.1 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 74.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DIS 320 004L1 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Santhanam, Radhika ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 47.6 Junior 3 14.3 C 2 9.5 Senior 18 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 52.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 4.8 Required by my major 5 23.8 3 hours 7 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 16 76.2 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 4.8 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 26.3 63.2 10.5 2.8 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 28.6 38.1 28.6 2.9 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 19.0 52.4 28.6 3.1 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 67.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = B&E 309 401L1 INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Debin, George J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 40.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 29.6 Junior 7 25.0 C 3 11.1 Senior 20 71.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 5 18.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 46.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 35.7 Required by my major 7 25.0 3 hours 5 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 21 75.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 2.9 62.9 34.3 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.43 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 0.0 69.4 30.6 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 9.7 71.0 19.4 3.1 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 2.8 44.4 52.8 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 55.9 44.1 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 0.0 8.3 47.2 44.4 3.4 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 65.6 31.3 3.3 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 3.0 72.7 24.2 3.2 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 6.1 66.7 27.3 3.2 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 8.6 65.7 25.7 3.2 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 8.6 42.9 48.6 3.4 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 83.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 006L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ali, Mukhtar M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 53.8 Sophomore 2 5.1 B 14 35.9 Junior 8 20.5 C 3 7.7 Senior 29 74.4 D 1 2.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 20.5 Studies Program 1 2.6 2 hours 21 53.8 Required by my major 35 92.1 3 hours 6 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.3 4 - 5 hours 4 10.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 0.0 0.0 72.5 27.5 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 12.5 22.5 57.5 7.5 2.6 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 0.0 0.0 47.5 52.5 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 0.0 57.5 42.5 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 2.5 10.0 55.0 32.5 3.2 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 0.0 2.5 52.5 45.0 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 40 0.0 0.0 57.5 42.5 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 7.7 12.8 53.8 25.6 3.0 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 2.5 57.5 40.0 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 5.6 19.4 52.8 22.2 2.9 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 3.4 20.7 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 40 0.0 2.5 70.0 27.5 3.3 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 5.0 67.5 27.5 3.2 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 17.1 31.4 40.0 11.4 2.5 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 17.5 60.0 22.5 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 70.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 790 001L1 TIME SERIES ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ali, Mukhtar M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 77.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 88.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 11.1 Pass or Audit 2 22.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 11.1 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 88.9 4 - 5 hours 6 66.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 22.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 653 401L1 HEALTH ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = BLOMQUIST, GLENN C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 47.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 52.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 94.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 15.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 11 57.9 3 hours 2 10.5 Other (e.g. elective) 8 42.1 4 - 5 hours 5 26.3 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 2 10.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 20.0 40.0 35.0 3.1 0.89 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 15.0 20.0 55.0 10.0 2.6 0.88 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 20.0 45.0 30.0 3.0 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 25.0 35.0 40.0 3.2 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 15.8 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.90 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 15.8 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 5.0 10.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 15.0 30.0 40.0 15.0 2.6 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 25.0 40.0 35.0 3.1 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 25.0 15.0 60.0 3.4 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 477 001L1 LABOR ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berger, Mark C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 34.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 58.6 Junior 7 23.3 C 1 3.4 Senior 23 76.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 23.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 53.3 Required by my major 21 70.0 3 hours 5 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 9 30.0 4 - 5 hours 2 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 3.3 63.3 33.3 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 16.7 60.0 23.3 3.1 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 3.3 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 3.3 53.3 43.3 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 3.3 56.7 40.0 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 10.3 65.5 24.1 3.1 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 3.3 23.3 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 3.3 0.0 66.7 30.0 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 36.7 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 3.3 20.0 46.7 30.0 3.0 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 54.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 391 002L1 ECON & BUS STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bollinger, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 52.6 Sophomore 1 2.6 B 14 36.8 Junior 19 48.7 C 4 10.5 Senior 19 48.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 25.6 Studies Program 2 5.1 2 hours 16 41.0 Required by my major 37 94.9 3 hours 10 25.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 51.3 48.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 10.3 28.2 41.0 20.5 2.7 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 0.0 5.1 46.2 48.7 3.4 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 2.6 47.4 50.0 3.5 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 0.0 2.6 51.3 46.2 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 0.0 51.3 48.7 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 2.6 10.5 52.6 34.2 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 0.0 7.9 39.5 52.6 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 44.7 55.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 0.0 7.7 51.3 41.0 3.3 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 3.2 3.2 67.7 25.8 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 2.6 53.8 43.6 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 5.3 23.7 47.4 23.7 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 0.0 5.3 65.8 28.9 3.2 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 0.0 5.3 26.3 68.4 3.6 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 69.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 703 001L1 INTRO TO ECONOMETRICS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bollinger, Christopher ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 69.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 13 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 15.4 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 11 84.6 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 7 53.8 6 - 7 hours 2 15.4 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 20.0 13.3 53.3 13.3 2.6 0.99 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 13.3 26.7 53.3 3.3 0.96 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 6.7 0.0 20.0 73.3 3.6 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 93.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 412 001L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fackler, J S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 8.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 20 80.0 Junior 15 57.7 C 3 12.0 Senior 11 42.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 44.0 Required by my major 22 88.0 3 hours 9 36.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 12.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 7.4 44.4 48.1 3.4 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 14.8 51.9 33.3 3.2 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 11.5 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 3.7 11.1 51.9 33.3 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 23.1 46.2 26.9 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 27 3.7 7.4 70.4 18.5 3.0 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 18.2 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 3.7 70.4 25.9 3.2 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 3.7 70.4 25.9 3.2 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 11.1 63.0 25.9 3.1 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 3.7 7.4 51.9 37.0 3.2 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 54 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 412 002L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fackler, J S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 37.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 51.7 Junior 8 27.6 C 3 10.3 Senior 21 72.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 37.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 41.4 Required by my major 25 86.2 3 hours 5 17.2 Other (e.g. elective) 4 13.8 4 - 5 hours 1 3.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 3.4 51.7 44.8 3.4 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 3.4 6.9 48.3 41.4 3.3 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 6.9 51.7 41.4 3.3 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 24.1 51.7 24.1 3.0 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 10.3 48.3 41.4 3.3 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 6.9 41.4 51.7 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 17.2 48.3 34.5 3.2 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 10.7 57.1 32.1 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 3.7 59.3 37.0 3.3 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 10.3 62.1 27.6 3.2 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 10.3 51.7 34.5 3.2 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 52.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 401 001L1 INTERMED MICROECO THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garen, John E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 27.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 24 43.6 Junior 19 34.5 C 13 23.6 Senior 34 61.8 D 1 1.8 Graduate 2 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 16.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 22 40.0 Required by my major 45 81.8 3 hours 18 32.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 18.2 4 - 5 hours 6 10.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 60 1.7 0.0 63.3 35.0 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 58 12.1 24.1 51.7 12.1 2.6 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 58 1.7 5.2 50.0 43.1 3.3 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 60 0.0 15.0 51.7 33.3 3.2 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 60 1.7 10.0 51.7 36.7 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 60 0.0 1.7 51.7 46.7 3.5 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 60 3.3 13.3 70.0 13.3 2.9 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 58 5.2 37.9 51.7 5.2 2.6 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 60 3.3 8.3 61.7 26.7 3.1 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 60 1.7 1.7 35.0 61.7 3.6 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 46 0.0 0.0 58.7 41.3 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 59 1.7 3.4 57.6 37.3 3.3 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 60 6.7 33.3 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 60 1.7 18.3 65.0 15.0 2.9 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 41 9.8 9.8 70.7 9.8 2.8 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 57 5.3 8.8 45.6 40.4 3.2 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 57 5.3 8.8 56.1 29.8 3.1 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 59 1.7 8.5 59.3 30.5 3.2 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 57 14.0 28.1 42.1 15.8 2.6 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 58 1.7 29.3 48.3 20.7 2.9 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 58 3.4 15.5 48.3 32.8 3.1 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 107 Number of forms scanned = 61 Number of forms with at least one student response = 60 Percent completed = 56.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 732 001L1 LABOR ECONOMICS II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garen, John E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 60.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 20.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 2 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 410 001L1 CURRENT ISSUES IN ECON: TRANSITION ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gift, Richard E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 25.0 Junior 1 8.3 C 1 8.3 Senior 11 91.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 10 83.3 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 16.7 4 - 5 hours 5 41.7 6 - 7 hours 2 16.7 8 or more hours 1 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 36.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 471 001L1 INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gift, Richard E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 78.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 12.1 Junior 7 20.6 C 2 6.1 Senior 27 79.4 D 1 3.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 2.9 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 12 35.3 Required by my major 26 76.5 3 hours 7 20.6 Other (e.g. elective) 7 20.6 4 - 5 hours 10 29.4 6 - 7 hours 2 5.9 8 or more hours 2 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 2.7 0.0 27.0 70.3 3.6 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 0.0 92.3 3.8 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 0.0 26.5 73.5 3.7 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 5.6 8.3 33.3 52.8 3.3 0.86 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 5.6 36.1 58.3 3.5 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 0.0 36.1 63.9 3.6 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 8.1 45.9 45.9 3.4 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 21.6 78.4 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 0.0 10.8 89.2 3.9 0.31 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 5.4 21.6 73.0 3.7 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 0.0 0.0 37.8 62.2 3.6 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 2.7 40.5 56.8 3.5 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 0.0 24.3 75.7 3.8 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 5.4 27.0 67.6 3.6 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 2.7 37.8 59.5 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 0.0 8.3 27.8 63.9 3.6 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 62.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 499 001S1 SEM ECONOMICS: THE WEALTH OF NATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gift, Richard E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 92.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 7.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 13 92.9 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 7 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 201 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, Gail ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 16 34.0 A 31 66.0 Sophomore 14 29.8 B 15 31.9 Junior 10 21.3 C 1 2.1 Senior 7 14.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 29.2 Studies Program 7 14.9 2 hours 14 29.2 Required by my major 32 68.1 3 hours 16 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 17.0 4 - 5 hours 3 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 0.0 0.0 32.7 67.3 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 50 0.0 14.0 52.0 34.0 3.2 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 52 0.0 3.8 32.7 63.5 3.6 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 0.0 1.9 28.8 69.2 3.7 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 51 0.0 0.0 43.1 56.9 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 52 0.0 1.9 51.9 46.2 3.4 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 50 0.0 10.0 44.0 46.0 3.4 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 0.0 0.0 17.3 82.7 3.8 0.38 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 0.0 0.0 11.5 88.5 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 51 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 50 0.0 6.0 34.0 60.0 3.5 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 52 0.0 0.0 17.3 82.7 3.8 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 48 0.0 8.3 56.3 35.4 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 0.0 1.9 53.8 44.2 3.4 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 52 0.0 5.8 48.1 46.2 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 52 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 51 3.9 19.6 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 52 0.0 1.9 28.8 69.2 3.7 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 52 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.27. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 44.4 11.1 44.4 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 52 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 201 002L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, Gail ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 18 33.3 A 25 47.2 Sophomore 23 42.6 B 20 37.7 Junior 7 13.0 C 8 15.1 Senior 4 7.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 22.2 Studies Program 8 14.8 2 hours 17 31.5 Required by my major 40 74.1 3 hours 16 29.6 Other (e.g. elective) 6 11.1 4 - 5 hours 8 14.8 6 - 7 hours 1 1.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 57 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 58 3.4 20.7 48.3 27.6 3.0 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 58 1.7 0.0 48.3 50.0 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 58 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 58 0.0 0.0 32.8 67.2 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 56 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 58 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 55 0.0 5.5 58.2 36.4 3.3 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 58 0.0 0.0 20.7 79.3 3.8 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 58 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 54 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 58 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 58 3.4 0.0 34.5 62.1 3.6 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 57 0.0 0.0 17.5 82.5 3.8 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 54 0.0 7.4 72.2 20.4 3.1 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 58 0.0 1.7 65.5 32.8 3.3 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 58 0.0 8.6 56.9 34.5 3.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 58 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 58 3.4 13.8 56.9 25.9 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 58 0.0 3.4 29.3 67.2 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 58 0.0 1.7 12.1 86.2 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 80 Number of forms scanned = 58 Number of forms with at least one student response = 58 Percent completed = 72.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 201 003L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, Gail ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 141 49.5 A 129 45.4 Sophomore 87 30.5 B 125 44.0 Junior 39 13.7 C 27 9.5 Senior 14 4.9 D 2 0.7 Graduate 2 0.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.7 Pass or Audit 1 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 119 42.0 Studies Program 60 21.4 2 hours 93 32.9 Required by my major 183 65.1 3 hours 56 19.8 Other (e.g. elective) 38 13.5 4 - 5 hours 12 4.2 6 - 7 hours 3 1.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 293 0.3 0.3 38.2 61.1 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 291 3.4 17.2 47.8 31.6 3.1 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 291 1.0 3.8 46.0 49.1 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 294 0.7 1.7 37.1 60.5 3.6 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 294 0.3 1.7 39.5 58.5 3.6 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 291 0.3 0.7 48.8 50.2 3.5 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 293 0.3 5.5 54.6 39.6 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 269 0.4 20.1 46.1 33.5 3.1 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 292 1.0 1.0 31.5 66.4 3.6 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 293 0.3 1.0 19.8 78.8 3.8 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 280 0.7 0.4 39.6 59.3 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 290 0.3 1.4 34.8 63.4 3.6 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 293 1.4 11.3 45.1 42.3 3.3 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 291 0.3 1.0 25.1 73.5 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 252 2.8 8.3 61.9 27.0 3.1 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 289 1.4 5.2 50.9 42.6 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 283 1.4 7.4 53.4 37.8 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 291 0.3 3.1 46.0 50.5 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 288 4.2 32.3 40.6 22.9 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 292 1.0 4.1 41.8 53.1 3.5 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 292 0.7 1.4 16.4 81.5 3.8 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 59 0.0 11.9 62.7 25.4 3.1 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 77 1.3 3.9 62.3 32.5 3.3 0.59 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 65 0.0 7.7 66.2 26.2 3.2 0.56 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 29. Students free to express opinions 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 44. Question 44 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 474 Number of forms scanned = 300 Number of forms with at least one student response = 295 Percent completed = 62.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 450G001L1 ECONOMICS OF POVERTY AND WELFARE PROGRAMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, William H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 26.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 19 55.9 Junior 7 20.6 C 5 14.7 Senior 27 79.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 14.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 32.4 Required by my major 19 55.9 3 hours 9 26.5 Other (e.g. elective) 15 44.1 4 - 5 hours 6 17.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 2 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 2.7 67.6 29.7 3.3 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 0.0 5.4 59.5 35.1 3.3 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 2.7 10.8 51.4 35.1 3.2 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 8.1 59.5 32.4 3.2 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 2.7 13.5 64.9 18.9 3.0 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 2.8 13.9 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 2.7 5.4 62.2 29.7 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 43.2 56.8 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 0.0 60.6 39.4 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 2.7 59.5 37.8 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 2.8 13.9 63.9 19.4 3.0 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 5.4 48.6 45.9 3.4 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 5.7 71.4 22.9 3.2 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 5.7 68.6 25.7 3.2 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 11.8 55.9 32.4 3.2 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 2.8 61.1 36.1 3.3 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 8.6 22.9 45.7 22.9 2.8 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 2.7 10.8 59.5 27.0 3.1 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 5.4 2.7 56.8 35.1 3.2 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 66.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 499 003S1 SEM ECONOMICS:ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoyt, William H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 46.7 Junior 1 6.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 14 93.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 20.0 Studies Program 2 13.3 2 hours 4 26.7 Required by my major 13 86.7 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 13.3 0.0 80.0 6.7 2.8 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 13.3 73.3 6.7 2.8 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 2.9 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 26.7 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 20.0 60.0 13.3 2.8 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 26.7 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 31. Developed abil to conduct research 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ECO 201 401L1 PRINCIPLES OF ECO I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kranner, Edit ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 33.3 A 12 48.0 Sophomore 4 16.7 B 9 36.0 Junior 3 12.5 C 3 12.0 Senior 3 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 6 25.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 28.0 Studies Program 6 24.0 2 hours 5 20.0 Required by my major 12 48.0 3 hours 11 44.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 28.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 3.6 7.1 50.0 39.3 3.3 0.75 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 3.6 0.0 46.4 50.0 3.4 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 3.6 14.3 42.9 39.3 3.2 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 3.7 14.8 48.1 33.3 3.1 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 3.6 3.6 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 75.0 21.4 3.2 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 3.6 25.0 60.7 10.7 2.8 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 3.6 17.9 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 7.1 60.7 32.1 3.3 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 24 4.2 25.0 58.3 12.5 2.8 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 3.6 17.9 67.9 10.7 2.9 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 17.9 28.6 46.4 7.1 2.4 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 28 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 3.8 19.2 65.4 11.5 2.8 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 17.9 64.3 17.9 3.0 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 17.9 67.9 14.3 3.0 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 10.7 17.9 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 3.7 25.9 55.6 14.8 2.8 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 14.8 18.5 55.6 11.1 2.6 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 33.3 16.7 50.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 60.0 0.0 40.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ECO 479 401L1 PUBLIC ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Martie, Charles ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 23.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 20 52.6 Junior 7 18.4 C 9 23.7 Senior 31 81.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 26.3 Studies Program 1 2.6 2 hours 16 42.1 Required by my major 26 68.4 3 hours 9 23.7 Other (e.g. elective) 11 28.9 4 - 5 hours 2 5.3 6 - 7 hours 1 2.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 0.0 5.1 53.8 41.0 3.4 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 0.0 7.7 64.1 28.2 3.2 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 2.6 7.7 46.2 43.6 3.3 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 0.0 2.6 53.8 43.6 3.4 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 0.0 7.7 64.1 28.2 3.2 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 2.6 59.0 38.5 3.4 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 0.0 15.8 60.5 23.7 3.1 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 2.6 25.6 71.8 3.7 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 34 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.81 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 2.6 0.0 43.6 53.8 3.5 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 0.0 10.3 43.6 46.2 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 39 0.0 5.1 51.3 43.6 3.4 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 0.0 74.3 25.7 3.3 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 2.6 55.3 42.1 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 5.4 59.5 35.1 3.3 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 2.6 7.7 43.6 46.2 3.3 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 5.1 35.9 59.0 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 70.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 704 001L1 GEN EQUIL ANAL&WELFAR EC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Newlon, Elizabeth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 16.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 2 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 14.3 28.6 28.6 28.6 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 28.6 0.0 42.9 28.6 2.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 57.1 28.6 14.3 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 670 001L1 ECO INTNL FINANCIAL INST INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peek, Joe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 4 57.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 57.1 14.3 28.6 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 58.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 702 001L1 ADV MACROECONOMIC THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Reed, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 8.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 16.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 10 83.3 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 5 41.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 23.1 30.8 38.5 7.7 2.3 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 7.7 30.8 53.8 3.3 0.95 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 8.3 0.0 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.87 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 0.0 33.3 58.3 3.4 0.90 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 25.0 8.3 58.3 3.2 1.11 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 7.7 23.1 61.5 3.4 0.96 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 711 001L1 ECON OF FIRM STRATEGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Scott, Frank A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 71.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 14.3 I 0 0.0 Other 1 14.3 Pass or Audit 1 14.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 6 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 2 28.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 402 001L1 INTERMED MACROECO THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Toma, Mark ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 26.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 24 53.3 Junior 20 43.5 C 7 15.6 Senior 25 54.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 4.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 22.7 Required by my major 36 80.0 3 hours 10 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 9 20.0 4 - 5 hours 10 22.7 6 - 7 hours 2 4.5 8 or more hours 1 2.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 48 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 48 4.2 14.6 33.3 47.9 3.3 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 4.7 18.6 46.5 30.2 3.0 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 49 2.0 16.3 49.0 32.7 3.1 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 49 0.0 6.1 51.0 42.9 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 0.0 7.5 55.0 37.5 3.3 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 6.7 33.3 36.7 23.3 2.8 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 2.0 8.2 46.9 42.9 3.3 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 49 0.0 2.0 30.6 67.3 3.7 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 0.0 4.1 36.7 59.2 3.6 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 49 4.1 22.4 34.7 38.8 3.1 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 49 0.0 4.1 65.3 30.6 3.3 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 4.5 20.5 43.2 31.8 3.0 0.85 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 47 4.3 4.3 44.7 46.8 3.3 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 46 4.3 8.7 50.0 37.0 3.2 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 2.1 4.2 45.8 47.9 3.4 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 47 6.4 14.9 38.3 40.4 3.1 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 48 4.2 8.3 52.1 35.4 3.2 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 48 2.1 8.3 39.6 50.0 3.4 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 99 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 49.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 412 003L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Toma, Mark ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 24.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 18 43.9 Junior 9 21.4 C 12 29.3 Senior 32 76.2 D 1 2.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.4 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 31.0 Studies Program 4 9.5 2 hours 17 40.5 Required by my major 29 69.0 3 hours 7 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 9 21.4 4 - 5 hours 4 9.5 6 - 7 hours 1 2.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 6.8 75.0 18.2 3.1 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 18.2 38.6 34.1 9.1 2.3 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 2.4 23.8 69.0 4.8 2.8 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 44 11.4 13.6 63.6 11.4 2.8 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 44 2.3 15.9 68.2 13.6 2.9 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 0.0 2.3 86.0 11.6 3.1 0.37 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 2.3 65.1 32.6 3.3 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 37.1 57.1 5.7 2.7 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 11.4 15.9 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 2.3 9.1 61.4 27.3 3.1 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 39 0.0 2.6 74.4 23.1 3.2 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 14.0 74.4 11.6 3.0 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 11.6 37.2 41.9 9.3 2.5 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 43 0.0 16.3 74.4 9.3 2.9 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 3.1 21.9 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 43 2.3 18.6 69.8 9.3 2.9 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 2.7 27.0 62.2 8.1 2.8 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 4.7 7.0 74.4 14.0 3.0 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 18.2 31.8 38.6 11.4 2.4 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 13.6 15.9 56.8 13.6 2.7 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 7.1 33.3 47.6 11.9 2.6 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 77.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 412 004L1 MONETARY ECONOMICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Toma, Mark ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 21.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 40.5 Junior 13 34.2 C 11 29.7 Senior 25 65.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 2.7 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 5.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 35.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 27.0 Required by my major 31 81.6 3 hours 8 21.6 Other (e.g. elective) 7 18.4 4 - 5 hours 5 13.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 45 0.0 8.9 64.4 26.7 3.2 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 45 13.3 26.7 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 4.8 19.0 57.1 19.0 2.9 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 44 4.5 22.7 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 44 0.0 2.3 77.3 20.5 3.2 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 0.0 0.0 79.1 20.9 3.2 0.41 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 2.3 60.5 37.2 3.3 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 8.3 38.9 44.4 8.3 2.5 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 45 4.4 24.4 53.3 17.8 2.8 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 45 2.2 8.9 48.9 40.0 3.3 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 39 0.0 7.7 59.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 2.2 17.8 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 45 6.7 31.1 46.7 15.6 2.7 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 45 0.0 15.6 64.4 20.0 3.0 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 6.1 18.2 60.6 15.2 2.8 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 4.4 22.2 57.8 15.6 2.8 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 44 2.3 27.3 56.8 13.6 2.8 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 45 4.4 15.6 64.4 15.6 2.9 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 6.8 34.1 45.5 13.6 2.7 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 45 6.7 31.1 51.1 11.1 2.7 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 45 11.1 15.6 57.8 15.6 2.8 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 45 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 80.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 701 001L1 NEOCLASS MICROECO THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Trask, Kathleen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 36.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 54.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 1 9.1 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 18.2 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 81.8 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 5 45.5 8 or more hours 4 36.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 38.5 38.5 23.1 2.8 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 7.7 23.1 30.8 38.5 3.0 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 7.7 7.7 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.86 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 8.3 25.0 41.7 25.0 2.8 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 12 8.3 16.7 41.7 33.3 3.0 0.95 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 25.0 33.3 33.3 2.9 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 15.4 38.5 38.5 3.1 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 38.5 23.1 30.8 2.8 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ECO 772 001L1 INTERNATL ECON:TRADE THEORY AND POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Trask, Kathleen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 25.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 75.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 75.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 464 001L1 REAL ESTATE FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ambrose, Brent ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 27.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 18 62.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 10.3 Senior 29 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 27.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 31.0 Required by my major 22 75.9 3 hours 6 20.7 Other (e.g. elective) 7 24.1 4 - 5 hours 5 17.2 6 - 7 hours 1 3.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 65.5 34.5 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 17.2 72.4 10.3 2.9 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 3.4 79.3 17.2 3.1 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 0.0 69.0 31.0 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 67.9 28.6 3.3 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 10.3 72.4 17.2 3.1 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 31.0 44.8 24.1 2.9 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 13.8 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 3.4 75.9 20.7 3.2 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 20.7 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 3.6 64.3 32.1 3.3 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 3.6 67.9 28.6 3.3 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 3.6 71.4 25.0 3.2 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 25.0 53.6 21.4 3.0 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 7.4 63.0 29.6 3.2 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 60.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 664 401L1 REAL ESTATE FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ambrose, Brent ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 21 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 14.3 Required by my major 14 66.7 3 hours 10 47.6 Other (e.g. elective) 7 33.3 4 - 5 hours 6 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 19.0 71.4 9.5 2.9 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 13.6 36.4 50.0 3.4 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 22.7 50.0 22.7 2.9 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 81.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 445 002L1 CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND FINANCING DECISIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chew, It Keong K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 52.4 Junior 10 47.6 C 3 14.3 Senior 11 52.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 23.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 33.3 Required by my major 20 95.2 3 hours 7 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 25.0 31.3 31.3 12.5 2.3 1.01 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 8.7 65.2 21.7 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 4.3 21.7 60.9 13.0 2.8 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 8.7 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 17.4 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 17.4 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 52.6 36.8 5.3 2.4 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 8.7 34.8 43.5 13.0 2.6 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 9.1 31.8 31.8 27.3 2.8 0.97 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 13.0 34.8 34.8 17.4 2.6 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 23 8.7 17.4 43.5 30.4 3.0 0.93 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 21.7 52.2 26.1 3.0 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 17.4 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 17.4 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 17.4 30.4 43.5 8.7 2.4 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 39.1 43.5 13.0 2.7 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 26.1 17.4 47.8 8.7 2.4 0.99. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 74.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 445 003L1 CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND FINANCING DECISIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chew, It Keong K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 50.0 Junior 17 56.7 C 8 26.7 Senior 13 43.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 6.7 Studies Program 1 3.3 2 hours 12 40.0 Required by my major 27 90.0 3 hours 12 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.7 4 - 5 hours 3 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 3.2 6.5 74.2 16.1 3.0 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 23.1 15.4 53.8 7.7 2.5 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 3.2 19.4 71.0 6.5 2.8 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 12.9 77.4 9.7 3.0 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 6.5 83.9 9.7 3.0 0.41 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 22.6 71.0 6.5 2.8 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 61.3 38.7 0.0 2.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 6.7 33.3 56.7 3.3 2.6 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 88.0 12.0 3.1 0.33 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 22.6 64.5 12.9 2.9 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 10.0 43.3 36.7 10.0 2.5 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 12.9 64.5 22.6 3.1 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 28.0 64.0 8.0 2.8 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 9.7 67.7 22.6 3.1 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 19.4 61.3 19.4 3.0 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 10.0 43.3 40.0 6.7 2.4 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 35.5 58.1 6.5 2.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 9.7 32.3 54.8 3.2 2.5 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 81.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 623 001L1 INTERNATL FINANCIAL MGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chew, It Keong K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 61.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 5.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 17 94.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 5.6 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 3 16.7 Required by my major 6 33.3 3 hours 8 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 11 61.1 4 - 5 hours 4 22.2 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 11.8 5.9 82.4 0.0 2.7 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 15.8 68.4 15.8 3.0 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 21.1 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 84.2 10.5 3.1 0.40 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 5.3 84.2 10.5 3.1 0.40 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 21.1 42.1 36.8 3.2 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 67.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 452 001L1 OPTIONS AND FUTURES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Childs, Paul D. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 1 6.3 C 2 13.3 Senior 15 93.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 13 81.3 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 18.8 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 11.8 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 5.9 5.9 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 17.6 35.3 47.1 3.3 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 5.9 17.6 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 41.2 41.2 17.6 2.8 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 18.8 43.8 37.5 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 17.6 35.3 41.2 3.1 0.93 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 29.4 35.3 35.3 3.1 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 35.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 452 002L1 OPTIONS AND FUTURES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Childs, Paul D. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 34.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 51.7 Junior 2 6.9 C 3 10.3 Senior 27 93.1 D 1 3.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 20.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 31.0 Required by my major 27 93.1 3 hours 12 41.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.9 4 - 5 hours 2 6.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 6.9 17.2 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 0.0 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 6.9 41.4 51.7 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 20.7 41.4 37.9 3.2 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 6.9 48.3 44.8 3.4 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 27.6 31.0 41.4 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 34.5 41.4 24.1 2.9 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 0.0 67.9 32.1 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 17.9 42.9 39.3 3.2 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 10.3 44.8 44.8 3.3 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 13.8 41.4 44.8 3.3 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 490 001L1 SPEC TOPS IN FINANCE: VENTURE CAPITAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooney, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 56.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 40.0 Junior 1 3.2 C 1 3.3 Senior 30 96.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 35.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 45.2 Required by my major 23 74.2 3 hours 4 12.9 Other (e.g. elective) 8 25.8 4 - 5 hours 2 6.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 3.1 28.1 43.8 25.0 2.9 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 6.3 18.8 75.0 3.7 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 3.1 21.9 75.0 3.7 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 3.1 6.3 46.9 43.8 3.3 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 3.2 16.1 38.7 41.9 3.2 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 3.1 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 0.0 6.7 50.0 43.3 3.4 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 423 001L1 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Keith H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 52.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 41.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 5.9 Senior 34 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 5.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 44.1 Required by my major 29 85.3 3 hours 13 38.2 Other (e.g. elective) 5 14.7 4 - 5 hours 3 8.8 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 5.7 8.6 74.3 11.4 2.9 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 2.9 62.9 34.3 3.3 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 0.0 17.6 70.6 11.8 2.9 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 2.9 62.9 34.3 3.3 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 8.8 61.8 29.4 3.2 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 12.5 65.6 21.9 3.1 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 17.2 65.5 17.2 3.0 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 0.0 62.9 37.1 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 2.9 32.4 41.2 23.5 2.9 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 0.0 62.9 37.1 3.4 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 600 001L1 CORP FINANCIAL POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Keith H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 88.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 11.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 19 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 33.3 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 15 83.3 3 hours 3 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 3 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 22.2 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 38.9 22.2 33.3 2.8 0.99 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 38.9 38.9 22.2 2.8 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 26.3 36.8 26.3 2.8 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 450 001L1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jordan, Bradford ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 21.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 22 59.5 Junior 9 24.3 C 6 16.2 Senior 28 75.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 21.6 Studies Program 1 2.7 2 hours 11 29.7 Required by my major 35 94.6 3 hours 15 40.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.7 4 - 5 hours 2 5.4 6 - 7 hours 1 2.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 56.4 43.6 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 2.6 10.3 33.3 53.8 3.4 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 2.6 10.5 63.2 23.7 3.1 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 2.6 7.9 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 2.6 57.9 39.5 3.4 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 20.5 56.4 23.1 3.0 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 2.7 29.7 51.4 16.2 2.8 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 5.1 51.3 43.6 3.4 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 0.0 5.1 56.4 38.5 3.3 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 39 0.0 17.9 56.4 25.6 3.1 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 2.6 63.2 34.2 3.3 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 0.0 2.6 76.3 21.1 3.2 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 0.0 56.4 43.6 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 0.0 2.6 61.5 35.9 3.3 0.53 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 0.0 5.1 41.0 53.8 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 12.8 30.8 56.4 3.4 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 450 003L1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jordan, Bradford ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 27.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 55.6 Junior 6 33.3 C 3 16.7 Senior 12 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 22.2 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 16 88.9 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 4.5 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 13.6 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 9.1 27.3 59.1 3.4 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 18.2 31.8 50.0 3.3 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 4.5 9.1 36.4 50.0 3.3 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 450 002L1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jordan, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 19 52.8 Junior 9 25.0 C 5 13.9 Senior 27 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 44.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 33.3 Required by my major 36 100.0 3 hours 5 13.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 5.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 2.7 0.0 62.2 35.1 3.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 0.0 5.4 62.2 32.4 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 5.4 48.6 45.9 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 2.7 43.2 54.1 3.5 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 2.7 48.6 48.6 3.5 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 0.0 8.1 62.2 29.7 3.2 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 10.8 51.4 37.8 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 40.5 59.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 35 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 2.7 48.6 48.6 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 2.7 2.7 62.2 32.4 3.2 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 3.0 3.0 69.7 24.2 3.2 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 8.1 62.2 29.7 3.2 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 10.8 27.0 62.2 3.5 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 13.5 35.1 51.4 3.4 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 77.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 450 004L1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jordan, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 31.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 52.6 Junior 4 20.0 C 1 5.3 Senior 16 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 10.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 55.0 Required by my major 17 89.5 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 0.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 0.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 780 001S1 SEM FINANCIAL INSTITUTN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mullineaux, Donald J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 001L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 78.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 21.7 Junior 14 60.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 34.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 65.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 30.4 Required by my major 19 82.6 3 hours 1 4.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 17.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 4.2 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 0.0 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 12.5 29.2 58.3 3.5 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 0.0 25.0 70.8 3.6 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 002L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 18.2 Junior 25 75.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 24.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 22 66.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 21.2 Required by my major 31 93.9 3 hours 4 12.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 15.6 43.8 40.6 3.3 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 2.9 50.0 47.1 3.4 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 0.0 20.6 79.4 3.8 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 2.9 32.4 64.7 3.6 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 3.0 39.4 57.6 3.5 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 0.0 44.1 55.9 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 0.0 0.0 51.5 48.5 3.5 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 003L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 70.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 25.9 Junior 15 55.6 C 1 3.7 Senior 12 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 51.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 29.6 Required by my major 23 85.2 3 hours 5 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 4 14.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 11.1 63.0 25.9 3.1 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 8.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 3.8 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 26.9 42.3 30.8 3.0 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 55.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 300 004L1 CORPORATION FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 31 81.6 Sophomore 1 2.6 B 6 15.8 Junior 26 68.4 C 1 2.6 Senior 11 28.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 52.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 36.8 Required by my major 36 94.7 3 hours 4 10.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 2.6 15.4 53.8 28.2 3.1 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 0.0 5.1 43.6 51.3 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 0.0 2.6 41.0 56.4 3.5 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 0.0 0.0 41.0 59.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 0.0 0.0 41.0 59.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 0.0 8.1 59.5 32.4 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 0.0 43.6 56.4 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 35.9 64.1 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 35 0.0 2.9 51.4 45.7 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 0.0 48.7 51.3 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 2.6 0.0 48.7 48.7 3.4 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 39 2.6 0.0 56.4 41.0 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 3.2 3.2 51.6 41.9 3.3 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 2.6 0.0 56.4 41.0 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 2.6 0.0 50.0 47.4 3.4 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 0.0 56.4 43.6 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 2.6 2.6 61.5 33.3 3.3 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 2.5 40.0 57.5 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 0.0 2.5 27.5 70.0 3.7 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FIN 600 401L1 CORP FINANCIAL POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Officer, Dennis T. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 24 92.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 7.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 25 96.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.8 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 30.8 Studies Program 1 3.8 2 hours 9 34.6 Required by my major 19 73.1 3 hours 3 11.5 Other (e.g. elective) 6 23.1 4 - 5 hours 5 19.2 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 3.6 14.3 50.0 32.1 3.1 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 39.3 60.7 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 20.0 52.0 28.0 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 60.7 39.3 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 7.4 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FIN 480 401L1 MONEY & CAPITAL MARKETS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wertzler, Jon F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 60.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 10.7 Senior 27 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 29.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 55.6 Required by my major 23 85.2 3 hours 3 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 4 14.8 4 - 5 hours 1 3.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 6.1 15.2 66.7 12.1 2.8 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 9.1 18.2 72.7 0.0 2.6 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 21.2 75.8 3.0 2.8 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 3.1 87.5 9.4 3.1 0.35 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 3.1 78.1 18.8 3.2 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 0.0 25.0 59.4 15.6 2.9 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 12.1 69.7 18.2 3.1 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 3.0 18.2 63.6 15.2 2.9 0.68 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 7.4 66.7 25.9 3.2 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 6.3 65.6 28.1 3.2 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 18.2 69.7 12.1 2.9 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 6.1 75.8 18.2 3.1 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 12.0 68.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 17.2 65.5 17.2 3.0 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 24.1 55.2 20.7 3.0 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 12.9 71.0 16.1 3.0 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 25.8 61.3 12.9 2.9 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 3.1 25.0 65.6 6.3 2.8 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 3.1 15.6 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 55.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 780 001D1 SP TOPS MGMT:SOCIAL NETWORKS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brass, Daniel ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 14.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 28.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 11.1 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 8 88.9 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 22.2 8 or more hours 2 22.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 763 001L1 RESEARCH/DESIGN/ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Childers, Terry ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 50.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 50.0 4 - 5 hours 1 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 75.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 340 004L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooley, Edward L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 30.0 Junior 23 76.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 23.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 19 65.5 Studies Program 1 3.4 2 hours 5 17.2 Required by my major 28 96.6 3 hours 4 13.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 3.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 3.2 61.3 35.5 3.3 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 0.0 63.3 36.7 3.4 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 62 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 002L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 40.0 Sophomore 5 23.8 B 11 55.0 Junior 10 47.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 52.4 Studies Program 1 4.8 2 hours 6 28.6 Required by my major 17 81.0 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 4.3 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 21 4.8 19.0 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 16.7 54.2 29.2 3.1 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 57.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 004L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 52.4 Sophomore 4 20.0 B 9 42.9 Junior 13 65.0 C 1 4.8 Senior 3 15.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 40.0 Required by my major 19 90.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 5.9 29.4 52.9 11.8 2.7 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 31.6 47.4 21.1 2.9 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 22.7 50.0 27.3 3.0 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 19.0 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 51.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 005L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 25 62.5 Sophomore 2 5.0 B 12 30.0 Junior 27 67.5 C 3 7.5 Senior 11 27.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 35.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 35.0 Required by my major 34 85.0 3 hours 12 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 15.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 0.0 58.5 41.5 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 0.0 7.3 70.7 22.0 3.1 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 2.7 29.7 56.8 10.8 2.8 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 0.0 52.5 47.5 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 2.4 46.3 51.2 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 0.0 56.1 43.9 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 33.3 59.3 7.4 2.7 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 0.0 0.0 43.9 56.1 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 31.7 68.3 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 63.9 36.1 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 0.0 60.5 39.5 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 0.0 7.3 65.9 26.8 3.2 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 36 2.8 30.6 47.2 19.4 2.8 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 8.3 69.4 22.2 3.1 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 7.9 60.5 31.6 3.2 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 10.8 54.1 35.1 3.2 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 2.5 55.0 42.5 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 0.0 22.0 48.8 29.3 3.1 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 0.0 2.4 68.3 29.3 3.3 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 0.0 0.0 42.5 57.5 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 95.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 006L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 45.5 Sophomore 6 27.3 B 11 50.0 Junior 11 50.0 C 1 4.5 Senior 3 13.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 45.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 15 68.2 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 7 31.8 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 4.2 0.0 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 21.7 52.2 26.1 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 4.2 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 0.0 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 13.0 39.1 43.5 3.2 0.85 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 0.0 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 27.3 40.9 31.8 3.0 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 9.5 61.9 23.8 3.0 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 8.3 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 9.1 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 4.2 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 21.7 39.1 34.8 3.0 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 55.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 007L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 4 23.5 B 5 33.3 Junior 11 64.7 C 2 13.3 Senior 2 11.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 87.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 6.3 Required by my major 15 88.2 3 hours 1 6.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 10.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 10.0 60.0 25.0 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 20.0 73.3 6.7 2.9 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 5.0 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 4.8 4.8 61.9 28.6 3.1 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 14.3 61.9 23.8 3.1 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 47.4 31.6 15.8 2.6 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 5.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 5.0 55.0 35.0 3.2 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 4.8 4.8 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 19.0 52.4 28.6 3.1 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 48.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 010L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 1 9.1 B 4 40.0 Junior 8 72.7 C 1 10.0 Senior 2 18.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 60.0 Studies Program 1 10.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 6 60.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 30.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 3.7 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 20.0 30.0 50.0 3.3 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 26.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 301 011L1 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 48.5 Sophomore 7 21.2 B 14 42.4 Junior 17 51.5 C 3 9.1 Senior 8 24.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 45.5 Studies Program 1 3.0 2 hours 8 24.2 Required by my major 21 63.6 3 hours 5 15.2 Other (e.g. elective) 11 33.3 4 - 5 hours 4 12.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 2.6 65.8 31.6 3.3 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 2.6 10.5 65.8 21.1 3.1 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 2.7 18.9 64.9 13.5 2.9 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 8.3 52.8 38.9 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 0.0 56.8 43.2 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 2.7 5.4 56.8 35.1 3.2 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 2.6 52.6 44.7 3.4 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 2.7 59.5 37.8 3.4 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 2.7 54.1 43.2 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 5.7 57.1 37.1 3.3 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 10.8 56.8 32.4 3.2 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 17.6 50.0 32.4 3.1 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 8.6 65.7 25.7 3.2 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 2.9 5.7 60.0 31.4 3.2 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 5.4 56.8 37.8 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 2.8 11.1 52.8 33.3 3.2 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 2.9 60.0 37.1 3.3 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 90.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 712 001D1 ORGANIZ & INDIV BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Duffy, MichelLe ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 3 60.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 340 001L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Freeman, J W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 38 84.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 13.3 Junior 18 40.0 C 1 2.2 Senior 27 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 26 59.1 Studies Program 4 9.1 2 hours 9 20.5 Required by my major 39 88.6 3 hours 6 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.3 4 - 5 hours 2 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 47 0.0 6.4 55.3 38.3 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 10.9 21.7 47.8 19.6 2.8 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 2.3 4.7 65.1 27.9 3.2 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 46 0.0 0.0 63.0 37.0 3.4 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 47 2.1 2.1 51.1 44.7 3.4 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 0.0 0.0 65.9 34.1 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 47 0.0 0.0 51.1 48.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 44 6.8 18.2 59.1 15.9 2.8 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 47 2.1 2.1 46.8 48.9 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 47 0.0 0.0 36.2 63.8 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 41 0.0 0.0 58.5 41.5 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 47 0.0 0.0 48.9 51.1 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 45 0.0 4.4 46.7 48.9 3.4 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 46 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 45 0.0 4.4 68.9 26.7 3.2 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 0.0 4.4 60.0 35.6 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 45 0.0 4.4 66.7 28.9 3.2 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 0.0 0.0 67.4 32.6 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 0.0 15.6 48.9 35.6 3.2 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 46 0.0 10.9 43.5 45.7 3.3 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 46 2.2 4.3 30.4 63.0 3.5 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 63 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 47 Percent completed = 74.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 340 002L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Freeman, J W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 35 89.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 10.3 Junior 21 53.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 18 46.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 30 78.9 Studies Program 1 2.6 2 hours 6 15.8 Required by my major 38 97.4 3 hours 2 5.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 4.9 43.9 51.2 3.5 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 5.1 41.0 30.8 23.1 2.7 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 9.8 53.7 36.6 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 4.9 31.7 63.4 3.6 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 12.2 39.0 48.8 3.4 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 2.4 46.3 51.2 3.5 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 2.6 18.4 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 2.4 0.0 48.8 48.8 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 26.8 73.2 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 5.3 44.7 50.0 3.4 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 2.5 50.0 47.5 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 2.4 0.0 51.2 46.3 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 41 0.0 4.9 41.5 53.7 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 13.2 50.0 36.8 3.2 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 5.0 57.5 37.5 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 2.6 0.0 60.5 36.8 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 2.5 55.0 42.5 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 0.0 12.2 51.2 36.6 3.2 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 0.0 7.3 51.2 41.5 3.3 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 41 2.4 2.4 41.5 53.7 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 63 Number of forms scanned = 41 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 65.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 340 402L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Freeman, J W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 25 78.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 21.9 Junior 20 62.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 34.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 56.3 Studies Program 2 6.3 2 hours 9 28.1 Required by my major 30 93.8 3 hours 4 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 3.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 3.0 45.5 51.5 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 21.9 59.4 18.8 3.0 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 0.0 51.5 48.5 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 39.4 60.6 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 0.0 12.1 87.9 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 0.0 0.0 30.3 69.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 0.0 30.3 69.7 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 0.0 0.0 48.5 51.5 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 0.0 6.1 51.5 42.4 3.4 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 0.0 15.6 84.4 3.8 0.37. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 320 003L1 SURVEY OF PERSONNEL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoffmann, Bronwyn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 30.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 57.7 Junior 5 18.5 C 1 3.8 Senior 22 81.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 7.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 37.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 51.9 Required by my major 18 66.7 3 hours 1 3.7 Other (e.g. elective) 9 33.3 4 - 5 hours 2 7.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 11.5 30.8 57.7 3.5 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 25.9 70.4 3.7 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 7.7 34.6 57.7 3.5 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 3.6 35.7 60.7 3.6 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 3.8 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 0.0 3.6 35.7 60.7 3.6 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 11.1 48.1 40.7 3.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 320 004L1 SURVEY OF PERSONNEL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoffmann, Bronwyn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 18.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 75.0 Junior 8 47.1 C 1 6.3 Senior 9 52.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 47.1 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 7 41.2 Required by my major 15 88.2 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 14.3 33.3 52.4 3.4 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 14.3 81.0 3.8 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 19.0 76.2 3.7 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 52.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 491 001L1 SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoffmann, Bronwyn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 18 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 10 52.6 3 hours 8 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 9 47.4 4 - 5 hours 4 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 0.0 58.8 35.3 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 491 002L1 SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hoffmann, Bronwyn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 86.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 13.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 46.7 Required by my major 8 53.3 3 hours 5 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 46.7 4 - 5 hours 2 13.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 6.3 50.0 37.5 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 697 401L1 TOP MANAGEMT LEADERSHIP IN CONTEMP BUS ENVIRONMT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holbein, Gordon ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 52.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 18 47.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 38 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 13.2 Studies Program 8 21.1 2 hours 16 42.1 Required by my major 30 78.9 3 hours 7 18.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 8 21.1 6 - 7 hours 2 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 5.1 7.7 56.4 30.8 3.1 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 5.1 7.7 53.8 33.3 3.2 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 10.3 10.3 61.5 17.9 2.9 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 5.1 7.7 61.5 25.6 3.1 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 10.3 23.1 41.0 25.6 2.8 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 7.9 13.2 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 7.7 48.7 43.6 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 15.4 20.5 38.5 25.6 2.7 1.02 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 15.4 17.9 46.2 20.5 2.7 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 5.1 15.4 48.7 30.8 3.1 0.83 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 10.3 5.1 56.4 28.2 3.0 0.87 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 20.5 15.4 41.0 23.1 2.7 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 39 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 7.9 15.8 42.1 34.2 3.0 0.91 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 13.2 15.8 52.6 18.4 2.8 0.91 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 15.8 28.9 39.5 15.8 2.6 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 13.2 7.9 60.5 18.4 2.8 0.89 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 18.4 31.6 34.2 15.8 2.5 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 23.1 15.4 43.6 17.9 2.6 1.05 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 15.4 23.1 30.8 30.8 2.8 1.06. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 90.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 699 401L1 BUS POLICY/STRATEGY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holbein, Gordon ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 10.0 2 hours 6 30.0 Required by my major 18 90.0 3 hours 6 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 8 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 5.0 10.0 55.0 30.0 3.1 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 14.3 38.1 42.9 3.2 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 9.5 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 71.4 23.8 3.2 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 20.0 55.0 15.0 2.8 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 14.3 38.1 47.6 3.3 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 33.3 57.1 3.5 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 91.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 320 001L1 SURVEY OF PERSONNEL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Nancy B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 52.9 Junior 7 41.2 C 1 5.9 Senior 10 58.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 12 70.6 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 23.5 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 27.8 44.4 27.8 3.0 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 35.3 58.8 5.9 2.7 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 320 002L1 SURVEY OF PERSONNEL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Johnson, Nancy B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 53.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 46.4 Junior 15 55.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 32.1 Required by my major 27 96.4 3 hours 3 10.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.6 4 - 5 hours 2 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 43.3 56.7 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 7.4 37.0 44.4 11.1 2.6 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 0.0 43.3 56.7 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 3.3 6.7 43.3 46.7 3.3 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 3.7 3.7 70.4 22.2 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 3.3 60.0 36.7 3.3 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 13.8 48.3 37.9 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 3.6 3.6 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 7.1 60.7 32.1 3.3 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 7.1 25.0 39.3 28.6 2.9 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 3.4 75.9 20.7 3.2 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 499 001L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lockhart, Daniel E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 62.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 37.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 30 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 26.7 Required by my major 30 100.0 3 hours 9 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 2 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 13.3 43.3 43.3 3.3 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 6.5 29.0 64.5 3.6 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 72.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 499 002L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lockhart, Daniel E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 53.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 43.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 3.3 Senior 32 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 12.5 Required by my major 32 100.0 3 hours 6 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 15.6 6 - 7 hours 3 9.4 8 or more hours 10 31.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 2.9 34.3 62.9 3.6 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 2.9 20.0 40.0 37.1 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 0.0 37.1 62.9 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 2.9 45.7 51.4 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 34.3 65.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 2.9 40.0 57.1 3.5 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 8.6 40.0 51.4 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 26.5 73.5 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 2.9 28.6 68.6 3.7 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 2.9 38.2 58.8 3.6 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 3.3 40.0 56.7 3.5 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 2.9 31.4 65.7 3.6 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 2.9 37.1 60.0 3.6 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 2.9 37.1 60.0 3.6 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 14.3 31.4 54.3 3.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 8.6 42.9 48.6 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 11.4 25.7 62.9 3.5 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 89.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 499 005L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lockhart, Daniel E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 82.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 17.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 23 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 30.4 Required by my major 23 100.0 3 hours 9 39.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 21.7 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 1 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 4.3 8.7 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.81 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 4.3 8.7 56.5 30.4 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 17.4 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 21.7 43.5 30.4 3.0 0.85 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 13.0 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 4.3 21.7 26.1 47.8 3.2 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 8.7 30.4 60.9 3.5 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 8.7 34.8 52.2 3.3 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 4.3 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 18.2 50.0 27.3 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 8.7 4.3 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 8.7 30.4 56.5 3.4 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 60.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 699 001L1 BUS POLICY/STRATEGY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lockhart, Daniel E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 88.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 11.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 27.8 2 hours 1 5.6 Required by my major 13 72.2 3 hours 3 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 9 50.0 6 - 7 hours 2 11.1 8 or more hours 3 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 341 401L1 BUSINESS LAW I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Myers, Larry W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 21.1 Junior 2 10.5 C 1 5.3 Senior 17 89.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 7 36.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 68.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 8 42.1 3 hours 1 5.3 Other (e.g. elective) 11 57.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 16.7 0.0 44.4 38.9 3.1 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 10.5 5.3 68.4 15.8 2.9 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 21.1 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 50.0 41.7 8.3 2.6 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 15.8 10.5 57.9 15.8 2.7 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 15 6.7 13.3 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.88 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 10.5 10.5 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 15.8 26.3 42.1 15.8 2.6 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 26.3 52.6 21.1 2.9 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 10.5 26.3 36.8 26.3 2.8 0.98. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 33.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 341 402L1 BUSINESS LAW I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Myers, Larry W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 35.7 Junior 3 20.0 C 1 7.1 Senior 11 73.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.7 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 8 57.1 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 6 42.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 0.34 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 6.3 12.5 62.5 18.8 2.9 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 12.5 6.3 62.5 18.8 2.9 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 18.2 27.3 45.5 9.1 2.5 0.93 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 84.6 7.7 3.0 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 12.5 6.3 62.5 18.8 2.9 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 18.8 62.5 12.5 2.8 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 6.3 0.0 81.3 12.5 3.0 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 32.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 492 001L1 ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND VENTURE CREATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Parker, Larry ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 35.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 65.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 15.0 Required by my major 12 60.0 3 hours 6 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 40.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.96 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 40.0 50.0 10.0 2.7 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 18.2 81.8 0.0 2.8 0.40 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 26.7 13.3 40.0 20.0 2.5 1.13 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 15.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 10.0 65.0 20.0 3.0 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.46 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 340 003L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Payne, Gary D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 67.5 Sophomore 1 2.5 B 11 27.5 Junior 23 57.5 C 2 5.0 Senior 16 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 25 62.5 Studies Program 2 5.0 2 hours 11 27.5 Required by my major 38 95.0 3 hours 2 5.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 2.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 0.0 10.0 32.5 57.5 3.5 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 40 0.0 0.0 22.5 77.5 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 19.4 35.5 45.2 3.3 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 0.0 2.5 22.5 75.0 3.7 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 0.0 2.5 32.5 65.0 3.6 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 0.0 2.6 43.6 53.8 3.5 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 5.3 39.5 55.3 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 5.7 42.9 51.4 3.5 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 0.0 32.5 67.5 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 0.0 15.4 33.3 51.3 3.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 2.5 40.0 57.5 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 0.0 2.5 22.5 75.0 3.7 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 62 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 64.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 340 401L1 ETHICAL/REGULATORY ENVIR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Payne, Gary D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 83.9 Sophomore 1 3.1 B 4 12.9 Junior 20 62.5 C 1 3.2 Senior 11 34.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 22 71.0 Studies Program 3 10.0 2 hours 5 16.1 Required by my major 27 90.0 3 hours 4 12.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 0.0 6.1 45.5 48.5 3.4 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 0.0 26.5 73.5 3.7 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 0.0 22.9 77.1 3.8 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 3.0 51.5 45.5 3.4 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 2.9 28.6 68.6 3.7 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 17.1 82.9 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 2.9 40.0 57.1 3.5 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 2.9 35.3 61.8 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 3.1 40.6 56.3 3.5 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 6.5 45.2 48.4 3.4 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 18.8 34.4 46.9 3.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 2.9 32.4 64.7 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 0.0 20.6 79.4 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 61.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 410 003L1 ANALYSIS ORGANIZA BEHAV INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shaw, Jason ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 38.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 19 55.9 Junior 6 17.6 C 2 5.9 Senior 28 82.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 47.1 Studies Program 2 5.9 2 hours 17 50.0 Required by my major 29 85.3 3 hours 1 2.9 Other (e.g. elective) 3 8.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 2.9 2.9 55.9 38.2 3.3 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 11.8 55.9 32.4 3.2 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 8.8 47.1 44.1 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 2.9 58.8 38.2 3.4 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 0.0 55.9 44.1 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 2.9 41.2 55.9 3.5 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 15.2 48.5 36.4 3.2 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 20.6 79.4 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 25.0 43.8 31.3 3.1 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 10.3 62.1 27.6 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 6.5 54.8 38.7 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 3.1 18.8 43.8 34.4 3.1 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 2.9 23.5 47.1 26.5 3.0 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 2.9 61.8 35.3 3.3 0.53 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 81.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 611 001L1 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shaw, Jason ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 60.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 39.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 39 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 23.1 Studies Program 2 5.1 2 hours 16 41.0 Required by my major 32 82.1 3 hours 8 20.5 Other (e.g. elective) 5 12.8 4 - 5 hours 4 10.3 6 - 7 hours 1 2.6 8 or more hours 1 2.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 2.4 48.8 48.8 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 2.4 2.4 50.0 45.2 3.4 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 2.4 45.2 52.4 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 11.9 57.1 31.0 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 2.4 40.5 57.1 3.5 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 2.5 17.5 57.5 22.5 3.0 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 2.4 9.5 40.5 47.6 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 42 0.0 2.4 26.2 71.4 3.7 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 40 0.0 0.0 47.5 52.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 42 2.4 2.4 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 2.4 11.9 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 41 0.0 12.2 56.1 31.7 3.2 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 7.1 59.5 33.3 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 2.4 4.9 63.4 29.3 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 40 2.5 22.5 47.5 27.5 3.0 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 2.4 0.0 57.1 40.5 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 2.4 21.4 54.8 21.4 3.0 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 2.4 4.8 52.4 40.5 3.3 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 2.4 2.4 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 97.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 499 003L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skaggs, Bruce ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 30.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 16 61.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 7.7 Senior 27 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 18.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 37.0 Required by my major 27 100.0 3 hours 6 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 18.5 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 10.7 75.0 14.3 3.0 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 7.4 70.4 22.2 3.1 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 10.7 64.3 25.0 3.1 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 3.6 3.6 67.9 25.0 3.1 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 3.6 57.1 39.3 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 14.3 53.6 32.1 3.2 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 3.6 46.4 50.0 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 3.6 35.7 60.7 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 3.6 3.6 53.6 39.3 3.3 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 28 3.6 0.0 46.4 50.0 3.4 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 3.8 3.8 73.1 19.2 3.1 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 74.1 25.9 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 28.0 56.0 12.0 2.8 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 7.1 46.4 46.4 3.4 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 10.7 21.4 67.9 3.6 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 65.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MGT 499 004L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skaggs, Bruce ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 32.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 68.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 25 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 44.0 Required by my major 25 100.0 3 hours 7 28.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 7.4 3.7 55.6 33.3 3.1 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 11.1 63.0 25.9 3.1 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 7.4 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 11.1 51.9 37.0 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 3.8 7.7 53.8 34.6 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 7.4 55.6 37.0 3.3 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 8.0 56.0 36.0 3.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 19.2 42.3 38.5 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 11.1 48.1 40.7 3.3 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 7.4 33.3 59.3 3.5 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 61.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MGT 499 401L1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wertzler, Jon F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 40.0 Junior 1 4.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 24 96.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.0 Studies Program 2 8.0 2 hours 9 36.0 Required by my major 23 92.0 3 hours 9 36.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 4.2 66.7 25.0 3.1 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 0.0 87.0 8.7 3.0 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 4.2 79.2 16.7 3.1 0.45 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 0.0 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 4.2 66.7 25.0 3.1 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 29.2 58.3 12.5 2.8 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 4.2 75.0 20.8 3.2 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 73.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 601 401L1 MARKETING RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Childers, Terry ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 56.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 13 86.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 13.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 18.8 Required by my major 11 68.8 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 31.3 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 5 31.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 20.0 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 13.3 6.7 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.92 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 21.4 35.7 28.6 2.8 1.05 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 40.0 33.3 20.0 2.7 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 33.3 40.0 26.7 2.9 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 26.7 33.3 40.0 3.1 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 435 001L1 INTERNATIONAL MARKETING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dahlstrom, Robert F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 35.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 20 58.8 Junior 8 23.5 C 2 5.9 Senior 26 76.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 38.2 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 11 32.4 Required by my major 20 58.8 3 hours 6 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 13 38.2 4 - 5 hours 3 8.8 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 61.8 38.2 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 0.0 14.7 61.8 23.5 3.1 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 3.3 73.3 23.3 3.2 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 5.9 61.8 32.4 3.3 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 8.8 50.0 41.2 3.3 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 0.0 8.8 64.7 26.5 3.2 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 0.0 61.8 38.2 3.4 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 6.1 51.5 42.4 3.4 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 6.1 63.6 30.3 3.2 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 9.4 65.6 25.0 3.2 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 31.3 43.8 25.0 2.9 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 8.8 64.7 26.5 3.2 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 2.9 52.9 44.1 3.4 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 81.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 300 001L1 MARKETING MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Donnelly, James H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 86 51.2 Sophomore 75 44.6 B 72 42.9 Junior 69 41.1 C 10 6.0 Senior 21 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 0.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 1.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 70 41.9 Studies Program 8 4.8 2 hours 58 34.7 Required by my major 130 77.8 3 hours 22 13.2 Other (e.g. elective) 29 17.4 4 - 5 hours 16 9.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 0.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 196 0.0 0.0 25.5 74.5 3.7 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 196 0.0 4.6 45.9 49.5 3.4 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 158 0.0 1.9 44.3 53.8 3.5 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 195 0.0 3.1 33.8 63.1 3.6 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 194 0.0 1.0 28.4 70.6 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 165 0.6 3.0 33.3 63.0 3.6 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 191 0.0 0.5 24.6 74.9 3.7 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 128 1.6 11.7 34.4 52.3 3.4 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 195 0.0 0.5 17.4 82.1 3.8 0.40 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 196 0.0 0.5 10.7 88.8 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 187 0.0 0.5 16.6 82.9 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 195 0.0 0.0 16.9 83.1 3.8 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 196 0.0 0.5 18.4 81.1 3.8 0.41 14. Encouraged class participation 196 0.0 0.0 12.2 87.8 3.9 0.33 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 187 0.5 3.2 39.6 56.7 3.5 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 193 0.0 2.1 36.3 61.7 3.6 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 188 0.5 1.6 39.9 58.0 3.6 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 196 0.0 1.5 30.6 67.9 3.7 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 193 0.5 5.7 41.5 52.3 3.5 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 193 0.0 1.6 24.9 73.6 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 193 0.0 2.1 7.3 90.7 3.9 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 576 Number of forms scanned = 196 Number of forms with at least one student response = 196 Percent completed = 34.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 450 002L1 MKT STRATEGY & PLANNING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Donnelly, James H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 87.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 13.0 Junior 1 4.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 22 95.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 56.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 30.4 Required by my major 22 95.7 3 hours 3 13.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 6.3 87.5 3.8 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 3.6 96.4 4.0 0.19 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 3.6 14.3 82.1 3.8 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 0.0 3.6 96.4 4.0 0.19 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 0.0 3.6 96.4 4.0 0.19. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MKT 310 004L1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Douglass, Bob ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 43.8 Sophomore 1 3.1 B 14 43.8 Junior 14 43.8 C 3 9.4 Senior 17 53.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 34.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 43.8 Required by my major 17 53.1 3 hours 5 15.6 Other (e.g. elective) 15 46.9 4 - 5 hours 2 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 5.7 0.0 57.1 37.1 3.3 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 2.9 5.7 62.9 28.6 3.2 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 5.9 14.7 64.7 14.7 2.9 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 2.9 8.6 65.7 22.9 3.1 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 5.7 25.7 48.6 20.0 2.8 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 2.9 2.9 62.9 31.4 3.2 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 2.9 0.0 54.3 42.9 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 2.9 31.4 48.6 17.1 2.8 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 5.7 25.7 48.6 20.0 2.8 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 2.9 8.6 60.0 28.6 3.1 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 31 3.2 3.2 67.7 25.8 3.2 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 5.9 20.6 52.9 20.6 2.9 0.81 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 11.4 34.3 34.3 20.0 2.6 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 35 5.7 5.7 60.0 28.6 3.1 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 6.5 16.1 48.4 29.0 3.0 0.86 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 5.9 14.7 50.0 29.4 3.0 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 6.3 15.6 50.0 28.1 3.0 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 5.9 14.7 52.9 26.5 3.0 0.82 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 8.8 26.5 35.3 29.4 2.9 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 2.9 29.4 52.9 14.7 2.8 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 5.9 38.2 41.2 14.7 2.6 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 79.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 410 001L1 PERSONAL SELLING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gassenheimer, Jule B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 52.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 40.0 Junior 1 4.0 C 2 8.0 Senior 24 96.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 16.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 32.0 Required by my major 14 56.0 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 44.0 4 - 5 hours 4 16.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 3.8 69.2 23.1 3.1 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 40.7 55.6 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 0.0 63.0 37.0 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 3.7 70.4 25.9 3.2 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 410 002L1 PERSONAL SELLING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gassenheimer, Jule B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 50.0 Junior 1 4.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 21 95.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 18.2 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 13 59.1 Required by my major 17 77.3 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 18.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 8.7 30.4 30.4 30.4 2.8 0.98 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 8.7 47.8 39.1 3.2 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 8.7 13.0 43.5 34.8 3.0 0.93 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 4.3 34.8 56.5 3.4 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 26.1 43.5 26.1 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 13.0 34.8 52.2 3.4 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 21.7 69.6 3.6 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 79.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 390 001L1 SPEC TOPS MKT: SPORTS MARKETING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kelley, Scott W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 41 85.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 12.5 Junior 12 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 36 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 21.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 31 66.0 Required by my major 26 54.2 3 hours 5 10.6 Other (e.g. elective) 22 45.8 4 - 5 hours 1 2.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 51 0.0 0.0 25.5 74.5 3.7 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 0.0 2.3 38.6 59.1 3.6 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 51 0.0 2.0 35.3 62.7 3.6 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 51 0.0 5.9 31.4 62.7 3.6 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 51 0.0 3.9 31.4 64.7 3.6 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 51 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 51 0.0 0.0 25.5 74.5 3.7 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 48 0.0 8.3 43.8 47.9 3.4 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 51 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 51 0.0 0.0 13.7 86.3 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 49 0.0 0.0 26.5 73.5 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 51 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 51 0.0 0.0 21.6 78.4 3.8 0.42 14. Encouraged class participation 51 0.0 0.0 9.8 90.2 3.9 0.30 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 50 0.0 2.0 44.0 54.0 3.5 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 50 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 48 0.0 10.4 41.7 47.9 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 51 0.0 0.0 39.2 60.8 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 51 0.0 2.0 37.3 60.8 3.6 0.54 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 50 0.0 2.0 26.0 72.0 3.7 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 50 0.0 0.0 18.0 82.0 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 62 Number of forms scanned = 51 Number of forms with at least one student response = 51 Percent completed = 82.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 623 001L1 MKT IN SRV/NONPROFIT ORG INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kelley, Scott W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 24 96.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 4.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 19 76.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 4.0 I 0 0.0 Other 5 20.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 24.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 20.0 Required by my major 13 52.0 3 hours 9 36.0 Other (e.g. elective) 12 48.0 4 - 5 hours 5 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 16.0 56.0 28.0 3.1 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 80.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 600 001L1 MARKETING MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Morgan, Fred W. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 30.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 21 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 20.0 Studies Program 2 10.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 16 80.0 3 hours 5 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.0 6 - 7 hours 2 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 13.0 47.8 39.1 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 26.1 39.1 34.8 3.1 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 4.5 36.4 36.4 22.7 2.8 0.87 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 9.1 50.0 27.3 13.6 2.5 0.86 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 13.6 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 4.3 8.7 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 21.7 34.8 43.5 3.2 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 8.7 91.3 3.9 0.29 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 28.6 47.6 23.8 3.0 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 26.1 47.8 26.1 3.0 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 17.4 39.1 39.1 3.1 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 88.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 600 401L1 MARKETING MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Morgan, Fred W. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 84.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 7.7 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 28.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.1 Required by my major 11 78.6 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 21.4 4 - 5 hours 6 42.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 16.7 66.7 11.1 2.8 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 16.7 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 390 402L1 SPEC TOPS MKT: FRANCHISING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Scott, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 20.0 Junior 3 15.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 16 84.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 45.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 45.0 Required by my major 10 50.0 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 40.0 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 76.2 23.8 3.2 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 450 001L1 MKT STRATEGY & PLANNING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skinner, Steven J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 40.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 22 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 31.8 Required by my major 22 100.0 3 hours 2 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 30.4 52.2 17.4 2.9 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 4.2 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 12.5 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 13.6 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 4.2 16.7 79.2 3.8 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 450 003L1 MKT STRATEGY & PLANNING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Skinner, Steven J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 51.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 45.5 Junior 2 6.3 C 1 3.0 Senior 29 90.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 31.3 Required by my major 30 93.8 3 hours 5 15.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.3 4 - 5 hours 1 3.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 25.8 32.3 25.8 16.1 2.3 1.05 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 9.7 51.6 38.7 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 2.9 44.1 52.9 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 3.0 3.0 57.6 36.4 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 23.3 46.7 30.0 3.1 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 14.7 23.5 61.8 3.5 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 2.9 50.0 47.1 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 6.7 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 3.0 0.0 66.7 30.3 3.2 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 8.8 58.8 32.4 3.2 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 2.9 64.7 32.4 3.3 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 0.0 20.6 47.1 32.4 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 5.9 55.9 38.2 3.3 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 8.8 32.4 58.8 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 73.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 330 001L1 PROMOTION MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Valerie A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 29 69.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 28.6 Junior 9 22.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 32 78.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 26 61.9 Studies Program 1 2.4 2 hours 13 31.0 Required by my major 35 83.3 3 hours 2 4.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 14.3 4 - 5 hours 1 2.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 20.0 14.3 54.3 11.4 2.6 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 2.4 59.5 38.1 3.4 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 2.4 0.0 54.8 42.9 3.4 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 2.4 52.4 45.2 3.4 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 0.0 51.2 48.8 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 2.4 50.0 47.6 3.5 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 2.4 14.3 54.8 28.6 3.1 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 42 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 42 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 42 0.0 2.4 57.1 40.5 3.4 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 7.9 68.4 23.7 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 42 0.0 9.5 64.3 26.2 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 0.0 14.6 63.4 22.0 3.1 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 0.0 2.4 64.3 33.3 3.3 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 0.0 11.9 50.0 38.1 3.3 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 53 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 330 002L1 PROMOTION MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Valerie A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 24 58.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 36.6 Junior 6 14.6 C 1 2.4 Senior 35 85.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 41.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 41.5 Required by my major 29 70.7 3 hours 6 14.6 Other (e.g. elective) 12 29.3 4 - 5 hours 1 2.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 7.9 21.1 52.6 18.4 2.8 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 41 0.0 2.4 53.7 43.9 3.4 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 42 0.0 0.0 26.2 73.8 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 0.0 43.2 56.8 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 0.0 16.7 40.5 42.9 3.3 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 42 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 7.9 63.2 28.9 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 42 0.0 4.8 54.8 40.5 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 0.0 14.6 63.4 22.0 3.1 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 0.0 14.3 59.5 26.2 3.1 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 0.0 2.4 50.0 47.6 3.5 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 0.0 2.4 33.3 64.3 3.6 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 53 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 340 001L1 INTRO MARKETING RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Tian, Kelly L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 50 92.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 7.4 Junior 4 7.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 50 92.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 40 74.1 Studies Program 1 1.9 2 hours 9 16.7 Required by my major 52 96.3 3 hours 4 7.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 1.9 4 - 5 hours 1 1.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 57 0.0 3.5 36.8 59.6 3.6 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 48 12.5 29.2 29.2 29.2 2.8 1.02 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 55 3.6 1.8 43.6 50.9 3.4 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 57 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 57 0.0 1.8 42.1 56.1 3.5 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 56 0.0 3.6 41.1 55.4 3.5 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 57 0.0 1.8 49.1 49.1 3.5 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 50 2.0 18.0 38.0 42.0 3.2 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 57 1.8 10.5 29.8 57.9 3.4 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 57 0.0 1.8 31.6 66.7 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 50 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 57 1.8 3.5 45.6 49.1 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 56 12.5 5.4 30.4 51.8 3.2 1.02 14. Encouraged class participation 57 1.8 5.3 35.1 57.9 3.5 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 51 2.0 3.9 43.1 51.0 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 57 1.8 3.5 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 55 3.6 7.3 41.8 47.3 3.3 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 57 1.8 7.0 43.9 47.4 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 57 7.0 12.3 38.6 42.1 3.2 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 57 5.3 10.5 40.4 43.9 3.2 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 57 5.3 3.5 31.6 59.6 3.5 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 63 Number of forms scanned = 57 Number of forms with at least one student response = 57 Percent completed = 90.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 340 002L1 INTRO MARKETING RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Tian, Kelly L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 44 88.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 12.0 Junior 4 8.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 46 92.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 39 78.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 18.0 Required by my major 49 98.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.0 4 - 5 hours 2 4.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 48 14.6 39.6 39.6 6.3 2.4 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 53 3.8 0.0 50.9 45.3 3.4 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 53 1.9 1.9 50.9 45.3 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 51 0.0 3.9 49.0 47.1 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 52 1.9 0.0 44.2 53.8 3.5 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 47 4.3 12.8 55.3 27.7 3.1 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 53 0.0 7.5 37.7 54.7 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 53 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 45 2.2 6.7 44.4 46.7 3.4 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 53 0.0 3.8 43.4 52.8 3.5 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 53 7.5 11.3 50.9 30.2 3.0 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 53 1.9 1.9 41.5 54.7 3.5 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 51 3.9 7.8 51.0 37.3 3.2 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 53 0.0 1.9 56.6 41.5 3.4 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 52 1.9 3.8 61.5 32.7 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 53 0.0 3.8 52.8 43.4 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 5.8 25.0 50.0 19.2 2.8 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 53 3.8 7.5 50.9 37.7 3.2 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 53 1.9 5.7 32.1 60.4 3.5 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 58 Number of forms scanned = 55 Number of forms with at least one student response = 53 Percent completed = 91.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 310 001L1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whittler, Tommy E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 44.1 Sophomore 1 2.9 B 13 38.2 Junior 16 47.1 C 6 17.6 Senior 17 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 20.6 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 17 50.0 Required by my major 33 97.1 3 hours 9 26.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 2.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 2.7 35.1 62.2 3.6 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 0.0 24.3 56.8 18.9 2.9 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 0.0 13.5 43.2 43.2 3.3 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 13.5 40.5 45.9 3.3 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 2.7 43.2 54.1 3.5 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 8.3 44.4 47.2 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 5.4 43.2 51.4 3.5 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 2.7 0.0 29.7 67.6 3.6 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 8.1 32.4 59.5 3.5 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 16.2 83.8 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 36 2.8 2.8 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 5.4 29.7 64.9 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 8.1 32.4 59.5 3.5 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 0.0 21.6 78.4 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 2.8 52.8 44.4 3.4 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 0.0 2.9 58.8 38.2 3.4 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 2.7 40.5 56.8 3.5 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 18.9 35.1 45.9 3.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 8.1 29.7 62.2 3.5 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 5.4 2.7 21.6 70.3 3.6 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 86.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MKT 310 002L1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whittler, Tommy E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 62.5 Junior 11 47.8 C 2 8.3 Senior 12 52.2 D 1 4.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 45.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 21 87.5 3 hours 5 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 12.5 4 - 5 hours 3 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 24.0 40.0 36.0 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 4.2 37.5 54.2 3.4 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 8.0 12.0 48.0 32.0 3.0 0.89 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 12.0 52.0 36.0 3.2 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 8.0 8.0 44.0 40.0 3.2 0.90 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 8.0 28.0 60.0 3.4 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 8.0 4.0 32.0 56.0 3.4 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 4.0 32.0 64.0 3.6 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 4.2 37.5 54.2 3.4 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 4.0 4.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 12.0 40.0 48.0 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 8.0 0.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.86 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 8.0 8.0 44.0 40.0 3.2 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 4.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 4.0 4.0 36.0 56.0 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 58.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ACC 201 004L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Caywood, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 10.7 Sophomore 18 64.3 B 14 50.0 Junior 6 21.4 C 9 32.1 Senior 4 14.3 D 2 7.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 7.1 Studies Program 2 7.4 2 hours 7 25.0 Required by my major 24 88.9 3 hours 11 39.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.7 4 - 5 hours 8 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 3.2 3.2 64.5 29.0 3.2 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 12.9 48.4 38.7 3.3 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 3.2 16.1 45.2 35.5 3.1 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 6.7 50.0 43.3 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 11.5 50.0 38.5 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 3.3 16.7 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 69.0 31.0 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 10.3 44.8 44.8 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 6.7 16.7 56.7 20.0 2.9 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 17.2 58.6 20.7 3.0 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 21.7 65.2 13.0 2.9 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 10.3 72.4 17.2 3.1 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 3.4 69.0 27.6 3.2 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 3.4 34.5 48.3 13.8 2.7 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 3.3 16.7 43.3 36.7 3.1 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 54.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 516 001L1 ADVANCED TOPICS IN FINANCIAL REPORTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chandra, Uday ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 29.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 47.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 17.6 Senior 14 82.4 D 1 5.9 Graduate 3 17.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 5.9 Required by my major 9 52.9 3 hours 7 41.2 Other (e.g. elective) 8 47.1 4 - 5 hours 5 29.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 4 23.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 23.5 52.9 17.6 2.8 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 17.6 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 5.9 29.4 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 41.2 35.3 23.5 2.8 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 17.6 23.5 41.2 17.6 2.6 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 89.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ACC 201 401L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, J. Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 22.7 Sophomore 12 54.5 B 11 50.0 Junior 8 36.4 C 6 27.3 Senior 1 4.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 27.3 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 5 22.7 Required by my major 19 86.4 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.1 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 3.8 0.0 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 23.1 42.3 34.6 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 29.2 41.7 29.2 3.0 0.78 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 16.0 24.0 44.0 16.0 2.6 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 26 3.8 15.4 38.5 42.3 3.2 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 9.1 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 64.0 32.0 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 8.0 4.0 52.0 36.0 3.2 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 12.0 32.0 36.0 20.0 2.6 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 23.1 46.2 30.8 3.1 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 15.4 34.6 50.0 3.3 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 55 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 46.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 208 002L1 CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Jean ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 22 81.5 Sophomore 19 70.4 B 4 14.8 Junior 8 29.6 C 1 3.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 29.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 44.4 Required by my major 27 100.0 3 hours 5 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 7.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 9.7 54.8 35.5 3.3 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 17.6 35.3 41.2 5.9 2.4 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 6.5 80.6 12.9 3.1 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 71.0 29.0 3.3 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 9.7 16.1 51.6 22.6 2.9 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 3.2 6.5 67.7 22.6 3.1 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 3.2 67.7 29.0 3.3 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 12.9 35.5 45.2 6.5 2.5 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 16.1 71.0 12.9 3.0 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 3.2 61.3 35.5 3.3 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 79.3 20.7 3.2 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 16.1 0.0 71.0 12.9 2.8 0.87 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 3.2 22.6 64.5 9.7 2.8 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 13.3 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 21.4 75.0 3.6 2.8 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 6.5 6.5 77.4 9.7 2.9 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 12.9 74.2 12.9 3.0 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 3.2 6.5 80.6 9.7 3.0 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 3.4 34.5 58.6 3.4 2.6 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 3.2 9.7 64.5 22.6 3.1 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 12.9 16.1 48.4 22.6 2.8 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 93.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 208 003L1 CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Jean ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 84.2 Sophomore 12 63.2 B 3 15.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 21.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 15.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 16 84.2 3 hours 3 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 5 26.3 6 - 7 hours 3 15.8 8 or more hours 1 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 16.7 33.3 41.7 8.3 2.4 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 15.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 5.0 15.0 55.0 25.0 3.0 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 21.1 21.1 42.1 15.8 2.5 1.02 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 10.0 65.0 20.0 3.0 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 15.0 10.0 55.0 20.0 2.8 0.95 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 15.0 75.0 10.0 3.0 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 10.0 85.0 5.0 3.0 0.39 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 10.0 5.0 65.0 20.0 3.0 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 26.3 63.2 10.5 2.8 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 10.5 15.8 42.1 31.6 2.9 0.97 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 15.8 10.5 36.8 36.8 2.9 1.08. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 208 004L1 CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Jean ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 22 78.6 Sophomore 21 75.0 B 6 21.4 Junior 6 21.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 3.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 7.1 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 13 46.4 Required by my major 27 96.4 3 hours 3 10.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 8 28.6 6 - 7 hours 2 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 3.3 6.7 56.7 33.3 3.2 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 21.4 50.0 21.4 7.1 2.1 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 3.4 10.3 79.3 6.9 2.9 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 10.0 10.0 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.84 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 13.3 13.3 53.3 20.0 2.8 0.92 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 6.7 20.0 56.7 16.7 2.8 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 3.3 0.0 66.7 30.0 3.2 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 16.7 46.7 30.0 6.7 2.3 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 6.9 17.2 72.4 3.4 2.7 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 3.3 0.0 73.3 23.3 3.2 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 27 3.7 3.7 81.5 11.1 3.0 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 3.4 13.8 72.4 10.3 2.9 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 10.0 26.7 56.7 6.7 2.6 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 30 3.3 16.7 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 3.4 13.8 69.0 13.8 2.9 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 20.7 69.0 10.3 2.9 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 3.3 13.3 70.0 13.3 2.9 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 6.7 36.7 50.0 6.7 2.6 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 10.0 26.7 56.7 6.7 2.6 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 93.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 201 001L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldman, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 42.9 Sophomore 12 54.5 B 8 38.1 Junior 5 22.7 C 3 14.3 Senior 2 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 13.6 Pass or Audit 1 4.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 23.8 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 4 19.0 Required by my major 15 68.2 3 hours 5 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 27.3 4 - 5 hours 5 23.8 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 1 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 25.0 45.0 30.0 3.1 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 0.0 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 3.0 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 22.7 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 4.5 13.6 81.8 3.8 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 52.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 201 003L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldman, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 5.4 A 17 45.9 Sophomore 22 59.5 B 11 29.7 Junior 6 16.2 C 7 18.9 Senior 7 18.9 D 2 5.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 18.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 21.6 Required by my major 31 83.8 3 hours 12 32.4 Other (e.g. elective) 6 16.2 4 - 5 hours 7 18.9 6 - 7 hours 3 8.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 0.0 0.0 42.5 57.5 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 0.0 0.0 52.5 47.5 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 0.0 2.5 55.0 42.5 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 40 0.0 2.5 47.5 50.0 3.5 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 32.4 44.1 20.6 2.8 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 0.0 2.5 32.5 65.0 3.6 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 0.0 22.5 77.5 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 3.7 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 2.6 15.4 41.0 41.0 3.2 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 2.5 30.0 67.5 3.7 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 7.7 7.7 57.7 26.9 3.0 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 0.0 2.6 55.3 42.1 3.4 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 10.3 33.3 33.3 23.1 2.7 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 61 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 65.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 201 006L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldman, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.6 A 9 23.7 Sophomore 22 57.9 B 21 55.3 Junior 13 34.2 C 8 21.1 Senior 2 5.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 10.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 26.3 Required by my major 31 81.6 3 hours 16 42.1 Other (e.g. elective) 7 18.4 4 - 5 hours 8 21.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 2.4 41.5 56.1 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 0.0 2.4 53.7 43.9 3.4 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 0.0 0.0 34.1 65.9 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 0.0 0.0 43.9 56.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 0.0 46.3 53.7 3.5 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 0.0 53.7 46.3 3.5 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 2.4 53.7 43.9 3.4 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 0.0 17.5 65.0 17.5 3.0 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 24.4 75.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 0.0 45.9 54.1 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 2.4 39.0 58.5 3.6 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 0.0 17.5 35.0 47.5 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 41 0.0 0.0 41.5 58.5 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 40 0.0 2.5 67.5 30.0 3.3 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 2.6 23.7 60.5 13.2 2.8 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 0.0 2.4 58.5 39.0 3.4 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 41 0.0 4.9 24.4 70.7 3.7 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 62 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 66.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 201 007L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldman, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 38.1 Sophomore 32 76.2 B 17 40.5 Junior 7 16.7 C 8 19.0 Senior 2 4.8 D 1 2.4 Graduate 1 2.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 16.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 37.2 Required by my major 37 88.1 3 hours 13 30.2 Other (e.g. elective) 5 11.9 4 - 5 hours 4 9.3 6 - 7 hours 3 7.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 46 0.0 2.2 43.5 54.3 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 0.0 0.0 67.4 32.6 3.3 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 46 0.0 0.0 28.3 71.7 3.7 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 46 0.0 2.2 34.8 63.0 3.6 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 46 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 46 0.0 0.0 41.3 58.7 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 0.0 6.5 47.8 45.7 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 45 2.2 24.4 57.8 15.6 2.9 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 46 0.0 0.0 28.3 71.7 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 46 0.0 0.0 8.7 91.3 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 43 0.0 0.0 32.6 67.4 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 46 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 46 0.0 2.2 39.1 58.7 3.6 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 46 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 40 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 46 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 46 0.0 2.2 54.3 43.5 3.4 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 0.0 25.0 54.5 20.5 3.0 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 46 0.0 2.2 34.8 63.0 3.6 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 46 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 62 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 46 Percent completed = 74.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 308 002L1 COST MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holmes, James R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 21.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 34.8 Junior 17 70.8 C 10 43.5 Senior 7 29.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 33.3 Required by my major 24 100.0 3 hours 3 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 16.7 6 - 7 hours 6 25.0 8 or more hours 3 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 8.3 4.2 75.0 12.5 2.9 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 29.2 41.7 25.0 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 8.3 12.5 54.2 25.0 3.0 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 8.3 33.3 41.7 16.7 2.7 0.87 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 16.7 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 13.0 65.2 21.7 3.1 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 8.7 26.1 43.5 21.7 2.8 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 8.3 37.5 37.5 16.7 2.6 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 24 12.5 4.2 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 8.3 8.3 62.5 20.8 3.0 0.81 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 8.3 29.2 50.0 12.5 2.7 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 27.8 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 20.8 54.2 20.8 2.9 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 16.7 50.0 29.2 3.0 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 16.7 58.3 20.8 3.0 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 21.7 52.2 17.4 2.8 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 13.0 26.1 47.8 13.0 2.6 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 17.4 21.7 47.8 13.0 2.6 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 61.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 324 001L1 ACCOUNTING INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holmes, James R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 50.0 Junior 8 44.4 C 3 16.7 Senior 10 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 17 100.0 3 hours 8 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 27.8 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 16.7 77.8 5.6 2.9 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 83.3 5.6 2.9 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 33.3 55.6 5.6 2.6 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 17 5.9 0.0 70.6 23.5 3.1 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 16.7 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 29.4 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 33.3 38.9 27.8 2.9 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 58.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 407 001L1 CONCEPTS OF INCOME TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hulse, David S. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 56.3 Junior 2 12.5 C 2 12.5 Senior 13 81.3 D 1 6.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 43.8 Required by my major 11 68.8 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 31.3 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 11.1 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 0.0 50.0 44.4 3.3 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 5.6 5.6 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 5.6 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 5.6 50.0 38.9 3.2 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 11.1 11.1 50.0 27.8 2.9 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 11.1 27.8 55.6 3.3 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 11.1 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 407 002L1 CONCEPTS OF INCOME TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hulse, David S. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 50.0 Junior 1 5.6 C 2 11.1 Senior 17 94.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 38.9 Required by my major 13 72.2 3 hours 7 38.9 Other (e.g. elective) 5 27.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 11.1 16.7 38.9 33.3 2.9 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 407 401L1 CONCEPTS OF INCOME TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hulse, David S. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 28.6 Senior 4 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 14.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 14.3 I 0 0.0 Other 1 14.3 Pass or Audit 1 14.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 28.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 3 42.9 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 4 57.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 33.3 16.7 50.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 53.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 300 001L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Keller, Stuart B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 34.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 42.9 Junior 18 51.4 C 6 17.1 Senior 17 48.6 D 1 2.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 2.9 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 31.4 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 11 31.4 Required by my major 33 94.3 3 hours 6 17.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.9 4 - 5 hours 5 14.3 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 5.7 14.3 68.6 11.4 2.9 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 2.9 60.0 34.3 3.3 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 8.8 58.8 32.4 3.2 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 2.9 0.0 40.0 57.1 3.5 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 12.1 57.6 30.3 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 14.3 62.9 22.9 3.1 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 2.9 25.7 71.4 3.7 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 43.3 56.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 11.8 29.4 52.9 5.9 2.5 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 35 2.9 20.0 60.0 17.1 2.9 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 18.5 55.6 25.9 3.1 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 2.9 5.7 68.6 22.9 3.1 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 2.9 8.6 62.9 25.7 3.1 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 2.9 5.7 68.6 22.9 3.1 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 5.7 48.6 40.0 5.7 2.5 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 2.9 28.6 51.4 17.1 2.8 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 11.4 51.4 37.1 3.3 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 300 002L1 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Keller, Stuart B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 34.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 31.3 Junior 14 42.4 C 11 34.4 Senior 19 57.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 15.2 Studies Program 1 3.0 2 hours 12 36.4 Required by my major 32 97.0 3 hours 12 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 69.4 30.6 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 13.9 13.9 47.2 25.0 2.8 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 2.8 8.3 72.2 16.7 3.0 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 2.8 8.3 72.2 16.7 3.0 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 2.9 71.4 25.7 3.2 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 8.6 14.3 57.1 20.0 2.9 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 11.1 33.3 36.1 19.4 2.6 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 2.8 5.6 69.4 22.2 3.1 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 22.9 34.3 31.4 11.4 2.3 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 34 8.8 32.4 44.1 14.7 2.6 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 17.4 26.1 47.8 8.7 2.5 0.90 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 6.1 18.2 63.6 12.1 2.8 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 9.4 9.4 71.9 9.4 2.8 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 27.3 30.3 36.4 6.1 2.2 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 20.0 25.7 42.9 11.4 2.5 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 14.7 14.7 52.9 17.6 2.7 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 61 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 59.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 508 001L1 CONTROLLERSHIP INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Madden, Donald L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 95.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 5.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 45.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 55.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 14 70.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 30.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 4.8 23.8 71.4 3.7 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 9.1 54.5 31.8 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 21 4.8 19.0 42.9 33.3 3.0 0.86 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 4.5 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 4.5 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 4.5 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 4.5 0.0 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 9.1 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 4.5 4.5 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 403 001L1 AUDITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Neal, Terry L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 32.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 53.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 10.7 Senior 27 96.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 17.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 39.3 Required by my major 23 82.1 3 hours 8 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 5 17.9 4 - 5 hours 4 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 3.1 40.6 56.3 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 3.1 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 9.4 53.1 37.5 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 3.1 0.0 46.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 25.0 35.0 40.0 3.2 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 3.1 6.3 50.0 40.6 3.3 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 3.1 56.3 40.6 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 3.1 6.3 53.1 37.5 3.3 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 3.6 64.3 32.1 3.3 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 6.5 3.2 67.7 22.6 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 9.4 50.0 40.6 3.3 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 3.1 6.3 28.1 62.5 3.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 403 002L1 AUDITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Neal, Terry L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 29.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 54.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 4 16.7 Senior 24 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 25.0 Required by my major 23 95.8 3 hours 7 29.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.2 4 - 5 hours 6 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 20.0 76.0 3.7 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 8.3 37.5 54.2 3.5 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 16.0 52.0 32.0 3.2 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 80.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 403 003L1 AUDITING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Neal, Terry L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 14.3 Senior 14 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 10 71.4 3 hours 6 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 4 28.6 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 700 001S1 TOP SEM ACC RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peffer, Sean A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 6 100.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 202 001L1 MANAGERIAL USES OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Poe, Clyde D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 10.8 Sophomore 20 54.1 B 18 48.6 Junior 14 37.8 C 13 35.1 Senior 2 5.4 D 1 2.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.7 Pass or Audit 1 2.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 29.7 Studies Program 1 2.7 2 hours 7 18.9 Required by my major 35 94.6 3 hours 11 29.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.7 4 - 5 hours 7 18.9 6 - 7 hours 1 2.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 0.0 16.2 56.8 27.0 3.1 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 3.0 30.3 54.5 12.1 2.8 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 5.6 27.8 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 5.6 5.6 63.9 25.0 3.1 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 11.5 0.0 53.8 34.6 3.1 0.91 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 34.6 42.3 15.4 7.7 2.0 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 22.2 27.8 38.9 11.1 2.4 0.96 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 2.8 2.8 52.8 41.7 3.3 0.68 11. Was available for consultation 30 3.3 0.0 70.0 26.7 3.2 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 2.7 27.0 48.6 21.6 2.9 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 38.9 36.1 19.4 5.6 1.9 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 36 33.3 52.8 11.1 2.8 1.8 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 19.2 38.5 34.6 7.7 2.3 0.88 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 8.1 29.7 51.4 10.8 2.6 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 11.1 36.1 41.7 11.1 2.5 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 10.8 24.3 54.1 10.8 2.6 0.82 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 44.4 41.7 8.3 5.6 1.8 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 27.0 29.7 37.8 5.4 2.2 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 21.6 32.4 29.7 16.2 2.4 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 118 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 31.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 202 002L1 MANAGERIAL USES OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Poe, Clyde D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 12.1 Sophomore 17 50.0 B 14 42.4 Junior 12 35.3 C 15 45.5 Senior 5 14.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 24.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 42.4 Required by my major 31 93.9 3 hours 8 24.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.1 4 - 5 hours 3 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 64.9 35.1 3.4 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 5.4 24.3 51.4 18.9 2.8 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 8.3 19.4 63.9 8.3 2.7 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 5.4 13.5 75.7 5.4 2.8 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 2.7 10.8 64.9 21.6 3.1 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 6.5 16.1 67.7 9.7 2.8 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 30.8 46.2 23.1 0.0 1.9 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 8.1 51.4 37.8 2.7 2.4 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 64.9 35.1 3.4 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 3.0 66.7 30.3 3.3 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 24.3 56.8 18.9 0.0 1.9 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 37 24.3 54.1 21.6 0.0 2.0 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 7.1 46.4 46.4 0.0 2.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 2.7 37.8 56.8 2.7 2.6 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 8.1 40.5 45.9 5.4 2.5 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 8.1 18.9 62.2 10.8 2.8 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 27.0 64.9 5.4 2.7 1.8 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 13.5 43.2 43.2 0.0 2.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 18.9 40.5 40.5 0.0 2.2 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 121 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 30.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 202 003L1 MANAGERIAL USES OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Poe, Clyde D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 13.7 Sophomore 19 36.5 B 32 62.7 Junior 24 46.2 C 12 23.5 Senior 9 17.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 21.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 28.8 Required by my major 43 82.7 3 hours 18 34.6 Other (e.g. elective) 9 17.3 4 - 5 hours 5 9.6 6 - 7 hours 2 3.8 8 or more hours 1 1.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 53 0.0 1.9 67.9 30.2 3.3 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 52 1.9 15.4 71.2 11.5 2.9 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 47 6.4 14.9 70.2 8.5 2.8 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 53 11.3 17.0 56.6 15.1 2.8 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 53 3.8 13.2 66.0 17.0 3.0 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 2.8 5.6 72.2 19.4 3.1 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 49 0.0 0.0 49.0 51.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 19.2 57.7 23.1 0.0 2.0 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 53 22.6 26.4 41.5 9.4 2.4 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 53 1.9 3.8 54.7 39.6 3.3 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 48 0.0 4.2 64.6 31.3 3.3 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 53 7.5 18.9 54.7 18.9 2.8 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 53 26.4 41.5 26.4 5.7 2.1 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 52 19.2 57.7 19.2 3.8 2.1 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 41 4.9 29.3 56.1 9.8 2.7 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 50 6.0 14.0 66.0 14.0 2.9 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 51 11.8 15.7 60.8 11.8 2.7 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 53 5.7 7.5 77.4 9.4 2.9 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 53 18.9 56.6 18.9 5.7 2.1 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 53 17.0 22.6 47.2 13.2 2.6 0.93 21. Overall quality of teaching 53 20.8 32.1 30.2 17.0 2.4 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 127 Number of forms scanned = 53 Number of forms with at least one student response = 53 Percent completed = 41.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 202 401L1 MANAGERIAL USES OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Poe, Clyde D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 29.2 Sophomore 10 41.7 B 8 33.3 Junior 4 16.7 C 8 33.3 Senior 2 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 12.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 4.2 I 0 0.0 Other 4 16.7 Pass or Audit 1 4.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 29.2 Studies Program 1 4.2 2 hours 10 41.7 Required by my major 20 83.3 3 hours 3 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 12.5 4 - 5 hours 3 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 15.0 65.0 15.0 2.9 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 8.3 16.7 54.2 20.8 2.9 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 4.3 65.2 26.1 3.1 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 10.5 5.3 78.9 5.3 2.8 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 53.8 30.8 7.7 2.4 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 4.3 30.4 52.2 13.0 2.7 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 21 4.8 0.0 81.0 14.3 3.0 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 21.7 65.2 13.0 2.9 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 13.0 47.8 30.4 8.7 2.3 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 23 17.4 39.1 43.5 0.0 2.3 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 41.2 52.9 5.9 2.6 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 30.4 52.2 17.4 2.9 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 12.5 79.2 4.2 2.8 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 13.0 56.5 30.4 0.0 2.2 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 8.7 39.1 39.1 13.0 2.6 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 16.7 29.2 41.7 12.5 2.5 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 84 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 28.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 507 001L1 ADV TOPS IN TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pope, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 27.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 54.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 18.2 Senior 11 91.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 9 75.0 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 25.0 4 - 5 hours 6 50.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 507 002L1 ADV TOPS IN TAXATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pope, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 60.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 22 88.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 12.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 40.0 Required by my major 18 72.0 3 hours 9 36.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 28.0 4 - 5 hours 5 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 4.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 12.0 40.0 44.0 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 301 001L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ramsay, Robert J. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 14.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 28.6 Junior 12 85.7 C 8 57.1 Senior 2 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 14 100.0 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 21.4 6 - 7 hours 3 21.4 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 15.8 42.1 36.8 3.1 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 36.8 42.1 15.8 2.7 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 10.5 10.5 47.4 31.6 3.0 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 26.3 57.9 10.5 2.7 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 15.8 15.8 42.1 26.3 2.8 1.03. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 70.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 301 003L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ramsay, Robert J. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 13.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 21 72.4 Junior 20 69.0 C 4 13.8 Senior 9 31.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 6.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 24.1 Required by my major 29 100.0 3 hours 9 31.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 17.2 6 - 7 hours 6 20.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 16.1 48.4 35.5 3.2 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 16.1 61.3 22.6 3.1 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 67.7 32.3 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 16.1 58.1 25.8 3.1 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 12.9 58.1 29.0 3.2 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 6.5 64.5 29.0 3.2 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 75.9 17.2 3.1 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 3.2 71.0 25.8 3.2 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 6.5 61.3 32.3 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 12.9 64.5 22.6 3.1 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 3.4 72.4 24.1 3.2 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 10.3 55.2 34.5 3.2 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 93.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 637 401S1 TAXATION OF PARTNERSHIPS AND PARTNERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Vines, Cynthia C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 35.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 85.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 4 28.6 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 10 71.4 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 14.3 28.6 50.0 3.2 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 0.76 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 14.3 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 7.1 0.0 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 35.7 28.6 28.6 2.8 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 14.3 7.1 71.4 3.4 1.02. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 302 001L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wells, Jane B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 46.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 28.6 Junior 12 42.9 C 7 25.0 Senior 16 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 7.1 Required by my major 28 100.0 3 hours 5 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 12 42.9 6 - 7 hours 6 21.4 8 or more hours 2 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.26 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 0.0 39.3 60.7 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.26 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.26 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 3.6 10.7 85.7 3.8 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.26 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.26 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 7.1 39.3 53.6 3.5 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.26. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 96.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ACC 302 002L1 INTERMED ACCOUNTING II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wells, Jane B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 26.7 Junior 5 33.3 C 4 26.7 Senior 10 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 6.7 2 hours 3 20.0 Required by my major 14 93.3 3 hours 7 46.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 13.3 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 2 13.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 5.9 88.2 3.8 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 0.0 23.5 70.6 3.6 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 11.8 11.8 76.5 3.6 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 73.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************