UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies DEPARTMENT = ROTC SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 31.3 A 32 47.8 Sophomore 11 16.4 B 14 20.9 Junior 13 19.4 C 1 1.5 Senior 22 32.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 20 29.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 39.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 25.0 Required by my major 8 11.8 3 hours 10 14.7 Other (e.g. elective) 60 88.2 4 - 5 hours 8 11.8 6 - 7 hours 1 1.5 8 or more hours 5 7.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 66 0.0 1.5 25.8 72.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 59 0.0 5.1 30.5 64.4 3.6 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 61 0.0 3.3 23.0 73.8 3.7 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 63 0.0 0.0 27.0 73.0 3.7 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 64 0.0 0.0 21.9 78.1 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 60 0.0 1.7 26.7 71.7 3.7 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 59 0.0 0.0 25.4 74.6 3.7 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 59 0.0 1.7 23.7 74.6 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 67 0.0 0.0 32.8 67.2 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 67 0.0 0.0 13.4 86.6 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 67 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 0.0 0.0 20.9 79.1 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 67 0.0 3.0 26.9 70.1 3.7 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 67 0.0 1.5 25.4 73.1 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 68 0.0 1.5 30.9 67.6 3.7 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 67 0.0 1.5 34.3 64.2 3.6 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 66 0.0 3.0 22.7 74.2 3.7 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 68 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 66 0.0 6.1 27.3 66.7 3.6 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 68 0.0 0.0 22.1 77.9 3.8 0.42 21. Overall quality of teaching 68 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 103 Number of forms scanned = 78 Number of forms with at least one student response = 68 Percent completed = 66.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Biotechnology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 29 61.7 Sophomore 3 6.3 B 11 23.4 Junior 13 27.1 C 5 10.6 Senior 32 66.7 D 1 2.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 17.0 Studies Program 1 2.1 2 hours 9 19.1 Required by my major 43 91.5 3 hours 13 27.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 6.4 4 - 5 hours 6 12.8 6 - 7 hours 3 6.4 8 or more hours 8 17.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 49 0.0 4.1 55.1 40.8 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 6.5 22.6 54.8 16.1 2.8 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 48 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 68.0 32.0 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 49 0.0 16.3 65.3 18.4 3.0 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 49 2.0 18.4 57.1 22.4 3.0 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 49 22.4 24.5 34.7 18.4 2.5 1.04 8. Graded assignments included comments 48 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 0.0 10.2 71.4 18.4 3.1 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 49 0.0 0.0 44.9 55.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 47 0.0 6.4 63.8 29.8 3.2 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 2.0 4.1 69.4 24.5 3.2 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 47 6.4 21.3 55.3 17.0 2.8 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 49 0.0 6.1 34.7 59.2 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 10.0 83.3 6.7 3.0 0.41 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 47 0.0 6.4 59.6 34.0 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 47 0.0 10.6 61.7 27.7 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 49 0.0 4.1 61.2 34.7 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 11.4 36.4 43.2 9.1 2.5 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 49 2.0 12.2 63.3 22.4 3.1 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 48 2.1 8.3 64.6 25.0 3.1 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 33. Amount of work appropriate 17 11.8 41.2 35.3 11.8 2.5 0.87 34. Instructor explained expectations 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 35. Instructor helped with my problems 17 0.0 23.5 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.53 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 12.5 12.5 25.0 50.0 0.0 3.1 1.09 38. Question 38 16 18.8 18.8 18.8 43.8 0.0 2.9 1.20 39. Question 39 16 18.8 31.3 12.5 37.5 0.0 2.7 1.20 40. Question 40 16 12.5 18.8 50.0 18.8 0.0 2.8 0.93 41. Question 41 16 18.8 18.8 37.5 25.0 0.0 2.7 1.08 42. Question 42 15 26.7 40.0 20.0 13.3 0.0 2.2 1.01 43. Question 43 16 6.3 12.5 18.8 62.5 0.0 3.4 0.96 44. Question 44 16 6.3 12.5 25.0 56.3 0.0 3.3 0.95 45. Question 45 16 18.8 25.0 6.3 50.0 0.0 2.9 1.26 46. Question 46 16 6.3 31.3 31.3 31.3 0.0 2.9 0.96 47. Question 47 16 6.3 18.8 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.9 0.85 48. Question 48 16 12.5 18.8 43.8 25.0 0.0 2.8 0.98 49. Question 49 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 3.7 0.79 Number of forms preslugged = at least 61 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 80.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ACE SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 51 82.3 Sophomore 5 7.9 B 11 17.7 Junior 27 42.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 31 49.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 26 41.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 9.7 Required by my major 34 54.0 3 hours 13 21.0 Other (e.g. elective) 29 46.0 4 - 5 hours 10 16.1 6 - 7 hours 1 1.6 8 or more hours 6 9.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 72 0.0 1.4 29.2 69.4 3.7 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 54 0.0 1.9 37.0 61.1 3.6 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 69 0.0 1.4 33.3 65.2 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 53 0.0 1.9 30.2 67.9 3.7 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 72 0.0 1.4 27.8 70.8 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 72 0.0 2.8 30.6 66.7 3.6 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 72 1.4 1.4 30.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 72 0.0 2.8 27.8 69.4 3.7 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 70 0.0 2.9 31.4 65.7 3.6 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 70 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 71 0.0 2.8 29.6 67.6 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 70 0.0 0.0 25.7 74.3 3.7 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 71 0.0 2.8 22.5 74.6 3.7 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 72 0.0 1.4 23.6 75.0 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 68 0.0 1.5 32.4 66.2 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 69 0.0 1.4 37.7 60.9 3.6 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 70 0.0 1.4 40.0 58.6 3.6 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 71 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 70 1.4 0.0 37.1 61.4 3.6 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 70 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 70 0.0 4.3 17.1 78.6 3.7 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 83 Number of forms scanned = 72 Number of forms with at least one student response = 72 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 27 7.5 A 151 41.8 Sophomore 30 8.3 B 151 41.8 Junior 105 29.2 C 54 15.0 Senior 155 43.1 D 3 0.8 Graduate 42 11.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.3 Pass or Audit 2 0.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 71 19.7 Studies Program 59 16.4 2 hours 133 36.9 Required by my major 216 60.0 3 hours 80 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 85 23.6 4 - 5 hours 40 11.1 6 - 7 hours 22 6.1 8 or more hours 14 3.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 394 0.5 2.3 47.2 50.0 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 378 5.3 19.0 44.7 31.0 3.0 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 391 0.3 3.8 48.1 47.8 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 392 0.8 6.6 46.7 45.9 3.4 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 394 1.5 5.1 50.5 42.9 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 392 0.8 6.4 49.0 43.9 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 389 3.1 7.2 44.7 45.0 3.3 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 388 1.0 6.4 49.2 43.3 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 394 1.0 5.1 41.1 52.8 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 394 0.5 0.0 28.9 70.6 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 384 0.8 1.0 38.3 59.9 3.6 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 393 1.0 1.8 37.4 59.8 3.6 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 395 3.3 6.6 41.5 48.6 3.4 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 390 1.3 3.3 36.4 59.0 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 364 1.1 5.2 56.9 36.8 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 383 1.0 3.7 48.8 46.5 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 384 1.0 3.9 50.5 44.5 3.4 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 386 0.8 3.1 46.1 50.0 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 384 4.4 15.9 45.3 34.4 3.1 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 393 1.0 7.1 44.8 47.1 3.4 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 390 1.5 6.9 28.5 63.1 3.5 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 70 1.4 12.9 65.7 20.0 3.0 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 84 1.2 2.4 66.7 29.8 3.3 0.56 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 80 1.3 6.3 58.8 33.8 3.3 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 46 0.0 10.9 67.4 21.7 3.1 0.57 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 61 1.6 18.0 62.3 18.0 3.0 0.66 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 28. Guided student report preparation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 29. Students free to express opinions 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 31. Developed abil to conduct research 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 21 4.8 0.0 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.75 33. Amount of work appropriate 21 4.8 4.8 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.78 34. Instructor explained expectations 21 0.0 9.5 33.3 57.1 3.5 0.68 35. Instructor helped with my problems 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 18 5.6 0.0 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.78 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 545 Number of forms scanned = 398 Number of forms with at least one student response = 396 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 55 87.3 Sophomore 8 12.7 B 7 11.1 Junior 13 20.6 C 1 1.6 Senior 22 34.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 19 30.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 25.4 Studies Program 1 1.6 2 hours 15 23.8 Required by my major 50 79.4 3 hours 10 15.9 Other (e.g. elective) 12 19.0 4 - 5 hours 4 6.3 6 - 7 hours 1 1.6 8 or more hours 17 27.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 62 0.0 1.6 35.5 62.9 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 57 0.0 0.0 50.9 49.1 3.5 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 50 0.0 0.0 34.0 66.0 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 56 0.0 1.8 37.5 60.7 3.6 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 7.1 16.7 23.8 52.4 3.2 0.98 8. Graded assignments included comments 45 2.2 6.7 28.9 62.2 3.5 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 63 0.0 7.9 38.1 54.0 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 63 0.0 0.0 30.2 69.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 61 0.0 0.0 32.8 67.2 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 62 0.0 0.0 37.1 62.9 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 63 0.0 3.2 41.3 55.6 3.5 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 62 0.0 1.6 29.0 69.4 3.7 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 59 0.0 3.4 35.6 61.0 3.6 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 61 0.0 1.6 41.0 57.4 3.6 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 59 0.0 5.1 37.3 57.6 3.5 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 61 0.0 0.0 37.7 62.3 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 60 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 63 0.0 7.9 39.7 52.4 3.4 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 63 0.0 4.8 36.5 58.7 3.5 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 72 Number of forms scanned = 63 Number of forms with at least one student response = 63 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Animal Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 8.0 A 142 52.2 Sophomore 23 8.4 B 102 37.5 Junior 81 29.5 C 24 8.8 Senior 91 33.1 D 2 0.7 Graduate 55 20.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 1.1 Pass or Audit 2 0.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 54 20.0 Studies Program 1 0.4 2 hours 80 29.6 Required by my major 200 73.5 3 hours 66 24.4 Other (e.g. elective) 71 26.1 4 - 5 hours 54 20.0 6 - 7 hours 7 2.6 8 or more hours 9 3.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 292 1.4 1.4 46.9 50.3 3.5 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 170 4.1 11.8 43.5 40.6 3.2 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 281 1.1 3.9 58.7 36.3 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 288 0.7 3.5 49.3 46.5 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 291 1.7 5.5 46.4 46.4 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 285 1.4 5.3 51.2 42.1 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 290 1.0 7.9 43.8 47.2 3.4 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 290 2.1 10.3 49.3 38.3 3.2 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 295 2.0 6.8 48.1 43.1 3.3 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 294 0.7 0.3 33.0 66.0 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 280 0.7 0.4 43.6 55.4 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 297 0.7 1.7 44.1 53.5 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 293 1.7 10.2 44.7 43.3 3.3 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 293 0.7 2.7 44.4 52.2 3.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 250 0.8 7.2 53.6 38.4 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 278 0.7 4.7 50.4 44.2 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 272 0.7 5.9 54.8 38.6 3.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 289 0.7 1.4 48.1 49.8 3.5 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 283 2.5 12.7 48.1 36.7 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 295 0.7 5.1 46.8 47.5 3.4 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 294 1.4 6.5 37.1 55.1 3.5 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 11.1 0.0 33.3 55.6 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 33. Amount of work appropriate 27 3.7 3.7 48.1 44.4 3.3 0.73 34. Instructor explained expectations 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 35. Instructor helped with my problems 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 344 Number of forms scanned = 299 Number of forms with at least one student response = 297 Percent completed = 86.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Biosystems and Ag Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 102 77.3 Sophomore 1 0.8 B 28 21.2 Junior 32 24.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 70 53.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 28 21.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.8 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 1.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 33 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 37 28.0 Required by my major 80 62.0 3 hours 31 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 49 38.0 4 - 5 hours 24 18.2 6 - 7 hours 7 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 140 0.7 0.7 52.9 45.7 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 95 4.2 17.9 48.4 29.5 3.0 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 140 0.7 2.9 51.4 45.0 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 126 0.8 1.6 50.8 46.8 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 139 1.4 0.7 49.6 48.2 3.4 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 141 0.0 5.0 53.9 41.1 3.4 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 140 1.4 18.6 43.6 36.4 3.2 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 140 0.7 10.0 55.7 33.6 3.2 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 140 1.4 7.9 46.4 44.3 3.3 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 140 0.7 2.1 37.1 60.0 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 138 0.0 1.4 44.2 54.3 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 141 1.4 2.1 46.1 50.4 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 140 2.1 16.4 41.4 40.0 3.2 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 140 0.0 2.9 43.6 53.6 3.5 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 117 0.9 8.5 56.4 34.2 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 138 0.0 5.1 50.0 44.9 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 138 1.4 3.6 51.4 43.5 3.4 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 140 1.4 2.1 50.7 45.7 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 138 5.8 18.1 44.9 31.2 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 140 1.4 7.1 40.0 51.4 3.4 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 138 0.7 7.2 37.7 54.3 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 42 7.1 0.0 33.3 59.5 3.5 0.83 33. Amount of work appropriate 42 11.9 4.8 35.7 47.6 3.2 0.99 34. Instructor explained expectations 42 2.4 4.8 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 35. Instructor helped with my problems 42 2.4 2.4 45.2 50.0 3.4 0.67 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 42 0.0 7.1 47.6 45.2 3.4 0.62 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 166 Number of forms scanned = 143 Number of forms with at least one student response = 141 Percent completed = 84.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Entomology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 26 22.4 A 78 67.8 Sophomore 7 6.0 B 30 26.1 Junior 19 16.4 C 7 6.1 Senior 24 20.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 39 33.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 37 31.9 Studies Program 34 29.3 2 hours 29 25.0 Required by my major 28 24.1 3 hours 22 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 54 46.6 4 - 5 hours 20 17.2 6 - 7 hours 8 6.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 124 1.6 3.2 32.3 62.9 3.6 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 93 7.5 18.3 47.3 26.9 2.9 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 121 0.8 7.4 38.8 52.9 3.4 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 114 0.0 2.6 26.3 71.1 3.7 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 114 1.8 6.1 21.1 71.1 3.6 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 117 1.7 2.6 39.3 56.4 3.5 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 114 1.8 3.5 29.8 64.9 3.6 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 109 0.9 5.5 40.4 53.2 3.5 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 122 1.6 4.9 32.8 60.7 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 124 0.0 2.4 22.6 75.0 3.7 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 119 0.0 0.8 35.3 63.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 124 1.6 2.4 33.1 62.9 3.6 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 124 2.4 7.3 39.5 50.8 3.4 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 124 1.6 4.0 33.1 61.3 3.5 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 99 2.0 10.1 47.5 40.4 3.3 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 113 3.5 5.3 41.6 49.6 3.4 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 104 3.8 13.5 43.3 39.4 3.2 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 123 1.6 1.6 36.6 60.2 3.6 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 124 0.8 21.8 37.9 39.5 3.2 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 121 1.7 7.4 33.9 57.0 3.5 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 121 1.7 4.1 25.6 68.6 3.6 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 46 0.0 6.5 60.9 32.6 3.3 0.57 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 44 0.0 15.9 45.5 38.6 3.2 0.71 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 45 4.4 4.4 46.7 44.4 3.3 0.76 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 11.8 17.6 47.1 23.5 2.8 0.95 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 0.0 35.7 28.6 35.7 3.0 0.88 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 33. Amount of work appropriate 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 34. Instructor explained expectations 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 165 Number of forms scanned = 124 Number of forms with at least one student response = 124 Percent completed = 75.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Forestry SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 2.3 A 107 61.8 Sophomore 12 6.8 B 59 34.1 Junior 29 16.4 C 3 1.7 Senior 99 55.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 31 17.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 1.1 Pass or Audit 4 2.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 37 21.0 Studies Program 6 3.4 2 hours 34 19.3 Required by my major 122 69.3 3 hours 28 15.9 Other (e.g. elective) 48 27.3 4 - 5 hours 14 8.0 6 - 7 hours 4 2.3 8 or more hours 59 33.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 183 1.6 4.9 45.9 47.5 3.4 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 92 19.6 13.0 41.3 26.1 2.7 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 153 3.3 3.3 57.5 35.9 3.3 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 117 3.4 2.6 50.4 43.6 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 174 3.4 11.5 47.7 37.4 3.2 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 177 1.7 5.1 53.1 40.1 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 166 1.8 5.4 51.8 41.0 3.3 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 166 2.4 7.8 51.2 38.6 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 181 2.8 7.7 51.4 38.1 3.2 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 186 1.6 0.0 35.5 62.9 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 181 5.0 6.6 43.6 44.8 3.3 0.80 12. Satisfact answered class questions 185 2.2 2.2 47.0 48.6 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 181 3.9 9.9 40.3 45.9 3.3 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 183 2.2 2.2 45.9 49.7 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 148 3.4 6.1 54.7 35.8 3.2 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 180 1.7 6.1 52.2 40.0 3.3 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 173 1.7 6.4 52.6 39.3 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 185 2.7 1.6 53.0 42.7 3.4 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 179 4.5 12.3 44.1 39.1 3.2 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 185 3.2 4.3 45.4 47.0 3.4 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 185 2.2 8.6 38.4 50.8 3.4 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 28. Guided student report preparation 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 29. Students free to express opinions 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 31. Developed abil to conduct research 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 33. Amount of work appropriate 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 34. Instructor explained expectations 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 35. Instructor helped with my problems 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 243 Number of forms scanned = 187 Number of forms with at least one student response = 187 Percent completed = 77.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ZAgriculture GENERAL and CEX SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 73 22.1 A 244 75.3 Sophomore 101 30.6 B 59 18.2 Junior 55 16.7 C 5 1.5 Senior 93 28.2 D 1 0.3 Graduate 7 2.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.3 Pass or Audit 15 4.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 152 46.3 Studies Program 23 7.0 2 hours 91 27.7 Required by my major 233 71.0 3 hours 48 14.6 Other (e.g. elective) 72 22.0 4 - 5 hours 22 6.7 6 - 7 hours 7 2.1 8 or more hours 8 2.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 368 1.6 4.1 45.9 48.4 3.4 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 192 9.9 21.4 32.8 35.9 2.9 0.99 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 339 3.5 5.9 52.2 38.3 3.3 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 219 0.9 8.7 47.9 42.5 3.3 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 348 1.7 4.6 43.4 50.3 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 353 2.3 4.5 49.3 43.9 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 312 1.6 9.0 44.2 45.2 3.3 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 315 1.6 7.3 41.6 49.5 3.4 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 361 3.0 7.2 41.3 48.5 3.4 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 366 1.1 1.9 38.3 58.7 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 352 0.3 1.4 43.2 55.1 3.5 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 365 2.5 3.6 40.0 54.0 3.5 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 363 4.1 9.4 35.8 50.7 3.3 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 366 0.3 0.8 30.6 68.3 3.7 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 359 1.9 2.8 43.5 51.8 3.5 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 362 2.8 4.4 41.7 51.1 3.4 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 349 3.4 8.3 43.3 45.0 3.3 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 364 2.2 3.8 42.6 51.4 3.4 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 357 6.4 12.0 40.1 41.5 3.2 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 363 6.9 9.4 32.5 51.2 3.3 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 361 3.3 6.4 30.7 59.6 3.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 21 4.8 14.3 52.4 28.6 3.0 0.80 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 25 16.0 4.0 56.0 24.0 2.9 0.97 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 24 12.5 4.2 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.85 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 33. Amount of work appropriate 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 34. Instructor explained expectations 20 5.0 0.0 20.0 75.0 3.7 0.75 35. Instructor helped with my problems 20 5.0 0.0 15.0 80.0 3.7 0.73 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 24 25.0 8.3 8.3 29.2 29.2 3.3 1.60 38. Question 38 24 16.7 8.3 8.3 29.2 37.5 3.6 1.50 39. Question 39 24 20.8 8.3 4.2 33.3 33.3 3.5 1.56 40. Question 40 24 12.5 8.3 8.3 29.2 41.7 3.8 1.41 41. Question 41 24 8.3 4.2 8.3 41.7 37.5 4.0 1.20 42. Question 42 24 20.8 4.2 20.8 33.3 20.8 3.3 1.43 43. Question 43 24 20.8 12.5 8.3 37.5 20.8 3.3 1.48 44. Question 44 24 25.0 25.0 8.3 33.3 8.3 2.8 1.39 45. Question 45 24 20.8 25.0 20.8 16.7 16.7 2.8 1.40 46. Question 46 24 4.2 4.2 16.7 37.5 37.5 4.0 1.06 47. Question 47 24 8.3 4.2 20.8 41.7 25.0 3.7 1.16 48. Question 48 24 16.7 4.2 0.0 54.2 25.0 3.7 1.37 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 447 Number of forms scanned = 372 Number of forms with at least one student response = 369 Percent completed = 82.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = LAAR SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 3.0 A 53 41.7 Sophomore 23 17.3 B 57 44.9 Junior 40 30.1 C 17 13.4 Senior 61 45.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.8 I 0 0.0 Other 4 3.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 11.4 Studies Program 2 1.5 2 hours 12 9.1 Required by my major 97 73.5 3 hours 23 17.4 Other (e.g. elective) 33 25.0 4 - 5 hours 22 16.7 6 - 7 hours 10 7.6 8 or more hours 50 37.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 138 2.2 10.1 48.6 39.1 3.2 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 98 4.1 15.3 57.1 23.5 3.0 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 126 4.0 13.5 42.9 39.7 3.2 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 91 2.2 6.6 53.8 37.4 3.3 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 135 6.7 16.3 40.7 36.3 3.1 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 131 6.1 11.5 48.1 34.4 3.1 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 125 4.0 9.6 48.8 37.6 3.2 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 129 7.0 11.6 41.9 39.5 3.1 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 139 10.1 15.1 34.5 40.3 3.1 0.98 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 139 2.9 7.2 29.5 60.4 3.5 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 135 0.0 0.7 51.1 48.1 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 138 3.6 13.0 39.1 44.2 3.2 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 138 3.6 15.9 39.1 41.3 3.2 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 136 2.9 8.1 46.3 42.6 3.3 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 125 2.4 7.2 51.2 39.2 3.3 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 133 3.0 12.0 42.9 42.1 3.2 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 131 3.1 14.5 38.9 43.5 3.2 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 136 2.9 14.7 36.8 45.6 3.3 0.81 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 133 3.0 11.3 46.6 39.1 3.2 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 135 10.4 14.1 27.4 48.1 3.1 1.01 21. Overall quality of teaching 133 12.8 15.0 20.3 51.9 3.1 1.08. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 163 Number of forms scanned = 141 Number of forms with at least one student response = 139 Percent completed = 85.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant and Soil Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 26 8.4 A 142 45.8 Sophomore 57 18.4 B 139 44.8 Junior 61 19.7 C 26 8.4 Senior 104 33.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 55 17.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 7 2.3 Pass or Audit 3 1.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 91 29.2 Studies Program 67 21.5 2 hours 90 28.8 Required by my major 176 56.6 3 hours 67 21.5 Other (e.g. elective) 68 21.9 4 - 5 hours 41 13.1 6 - 7 hours 12 3.8 8 or more hours 11 3.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 352 0.3 1.7 47.7 50.3 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 303 4.6 15.5 45.2 34.7 3.1 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 346 1.2 6.4 50.6 41.9 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 338 1.2 3.8 43.2 51.8 3.5 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 351 1.4 3.4 45.6 49.6 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 335 1.5 3.6 49.6 45.4 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 352 1.1 5.7 44.9 48.3 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 340 0.9 6.2 49.1 43.8 3.4 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 353 1.1 5.4 44.8 48.7 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 355 0.3 1.7 28.5 69.6 3.7 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 333 0.9 1.2 43.5 54.4 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 355 0.6 2.5 39.2 57.7 3.5 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 352 1.4 9.1 42.9 46.6 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 353 1.1 4.2 45.9 48.7 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 320 1.3 3.8 59.7 35.3 3.3 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 346 1.4 6.1 54.6 37.9 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 333 1.5 6.0 55.0 37.5 3.3 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 352 1.1 3.4 48.6 46.9 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 347 3.2 13.8 45.0 38.0 3.2 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 350 2.0 8.3 42.9 46.9 3.3 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 349 1.7 6.6 32.7 59.0 3.5 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 105 1.0 3.8 63.8 31.4 3.3 0.57 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 105 2.9 6.7 59.0 31.4 3.2 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 104 0.0 4.8 58.7 36.5 3.3 0.56 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 76 1.3 2.6 61.8 34.2 3.3 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 83 4.8 1.2 57.8 36.1 3.3 0.71 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 86 3.5 7.0 51.2 38.4 3.2 0.73 33. Amount of work appropriate 85 1.2 11.8 56.5 30.6 3.2 0.67 34. Instructor explained expectations 86 4.7 7.0 54.7 33.7 3.2 0.75 35. Instructor helped with my problems 84 3.6 8.3 53.6 34.5 3.2 0.74 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 78 2.6 1.3 59.0 37.2 3.3 0.63 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 532 Number of forms scanned = 373 Number of forms with at least one student response = 356 Percent completed = 66.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant Pathology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 31.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 25.7 Junior 16 45.7 C 15 42.9 Senior 14 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 14.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 19 54.3 Required by my major 31 88.6 3 hours 5 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 11.4 4 - 5 hours 4 11.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 14.3 25.7 45.7 14.3 2.6 0.91 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 22.9 34.3 34.3 8.6 2.3 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 13.3 30.0 40.0 16.7 2.6 0.93 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 27.6 24.1 37.9 10.3 2.3 1.00 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 38.7 22.6 25.8 12.9 2.1 1.09 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 16.0 24.0 52.0 8.0 2.5 0.87 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 6.5 6.5 61.3 25.8 3.1 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 14.3 32.1 46.4 7.1 2.5 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 28.9 13.2 36.8 21.1 2.5 1.13 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 5.3 5.3 50.0 39.5 3.2 0.79 11. Was available for consultation 31 3.2 19.4 45.2 32.3 3.1 0.81 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 5.6 22.2 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 30.6 27.8 30.6 11.1 2.2 1.02 14. Encouraged class participation 38 15.8 26.3 42.1 15.8 2.6 0.95 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 29.2 25.0 29.2 16.7 2.3 1.09 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 16.7 43.3 30.0 10.0 2.3 0.88 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 21.4 42.9 25.0 10.7 2.3 0.93 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 23.5 20.6 44.1 11.8 2.4 0.99 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 36.1 19.4 38.9 5.6 2.1 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 36.8 23.7 28.9 10.5 2.1 1.04 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 39.5 10.5 31.6 18.4 2.3 1.18. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 28 14.3 7.1 64.3 14.3 2.8 0.88 33. Amount of work appropriate 22 0.0 4.5 86.4 9.1 3.0 0.38 34. Instructor explained expectations 29 3.4 17.2 69.0 10.3 2.9 0.64 35. Instructor helped with my problems 26 11.5 19.2 57.7 11.5 2.7 0.84 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 26 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.37 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 50 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 76.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = RSO SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 63.6 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 2 9.1 B 9 40.9 Junior 5 22.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 4.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 77.3 Studies Program 7 33.3 2 hours 4 18.2 Required by my major 11 52.4 3 hours 1 4.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 75.0 20.8 3.2 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 8.3 37.5 54.2 3.5 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 29.2 29.2 41.7 3.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 8.3 8.3 45.8 37.5 3.1 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 8.3 58.3 29.2 3.1 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 38 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 63.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Veterinary Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 22 57.9 Sophomore 3 7.9 B 13 34.2 Junior 19 50.0 C 3 7.9 Senior 14 36.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 23.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 31.6 Required by my major 8 21.1 3 hours 15 39.5 Other (e.g. elective) 30 78.9 4 - 5 hours 1 2.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 2.6 0.0 50.0 47.4 3.4 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 2.7 5.4 29.7 62.2 3.5 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 2.6 2.6 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 2.6 0.0 47.4 50.0 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 2.6 2.6 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 2.8 0.0 47.2 50.0 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 2.7 8.1 45.9 43.2 3.3 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 18.2 51.5 30.3 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 2.6 0.0 44.7 52.6 3.5 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 2.6 0.0 31.6 65.8 3.6 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 32 3.1 0.0 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 2.6 0.0 42.1 55.3 3.5 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 2.6 0.0 44.7 52.6 3.5 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 38 2.6 0.0 44.7 52.6 3.5 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 3.0 6.1 60.6 30.3 3.2 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 2.6 2.6 55.3 39.5 3.3 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 2.7 2.7 51.4 43.2 3.4 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 2.6 0.0 52.6 44.7 3.4 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 2.6 0.0 52.6 44.7 3.4 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 2.6 0.0 31.6 65.8 3.6 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 2.6 2.6 28.9 65.8 3.6 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 49 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 77.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 18 10.8 A 90 53.9 Sophomore 44 26.3 B 43 25.7 Junior 38 22.8 C 5 3.0 Senior 46 27.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 12.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.6 Pass or Audit 29 17.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 40 23.8 Studies Program 58 34.5 2 hours 49 29.2 Required by my major 14 8.3 3 hours 37 22.0 Other (e.g. elective) 96 57.1 4 - 5 hours 24 14.3 6 - 7 hours 5 3.0 8 or more hours 13 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 179 0.6 2.2 43.6 53.6 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 158 2.5 8.2 43.7 45.6 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 170 1.2 4.7 48.8 45.3 3.4 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 109 0.0 1.8 53.2 45.0 3.4 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 158 1.3 7.6 41.8 49.4 3.4 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 172 1.7 5.2 45.3 47.7 3.4 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 162 0.0 5.6 53.1 41.4 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 161 1.2 7.5 40.4 50.9 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 180 1.7 5.6 43.3 49.4 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 181 0.6 0.0 26.5 72.9 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 162 0.6 1.2 43.2 54.9 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 181 0.6 1.7 44.2 53.6 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 181 4.4 7.7 34.8 53.0 3.4 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 182 0.5 0.5 33.5 65.4 3.6 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 172 1.2 2.3 32.0 64.5 3.6 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 172 1.7 4.7 44.2 49.4 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 143 3.5 9.8 42.0 44.8 3.3 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 179 1.7 2.2 44.7 51.4 3.5 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 179 4.5 17.3 32.4 45.8 3.2 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 181 2.8 9.9 35.9 51.4 3.4 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 178 1.7 9.6 32.0 56.7 3.4 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 24 12.5 45.8 25.0 16.7 2.5 0.93 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 50 8.0 14.0 52.0 26.0 3.0 0.86 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 51 0.0 13.7 58.8 27.5 3.1 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 39 2.6 7.7 43.6 46.2 3.3 0.74 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 28 3.6 21.4 35.7 39.3 3.1 0.88 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 14 0.0 7.1 14.3 78.6 3.7 0.61 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59 31. Developed abil to conduct research 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 14.3 7.1 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.95 33. Amount of work appropriate 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 34. Instructor explained expectations 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 35. Instructor helped with my problems 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 238 Number of forms scanned = 183 Number of forms with at least one student response = 183 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 227 27.8 A 426 52.6 Sophomore 222 27.2 B 332 41.0 Junior 167 20.5 C 43 5.3 Senior 144 17.6 D 4 0.5 Graduate 55 6.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.1 Pass or Audit 5 0.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 306 37.5 Studies Program 484 59.6 2 hours 257 31.5 Required by my major 195 24.0 3 hours 150 18.4 Other (e.g. elective) 133 16.4 4 - 5 hours 59 7.2 6 - 7 hours 28 3.4 8 or more hours 16 2.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 857 0.8 2.1 54.0 43.1 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 833 2.3 11.2 54.5 32.1 3.2 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 852 1.9 8.3 58.8 31.0 3.2 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 764 1.0 4.6 57.6 36.8 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 845 1.4 4.5 56.6 37.5 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 852 0.9 4.9 57.5 36.6 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 850 0.8 4.6 55.1 39.5 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 825 2.2 15.5 52.1 30.2 3.1 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 855 1.9 8.0 54.9 35.3 3.2 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 854 0.1 1.3 42.0 56.6 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 772 0.4 2.1 57.1 40.4 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 852 0.7 3.3 50.7 45.3 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 852 4.7 16.1 45.0 34.3 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 850 0.5 6.8 50.7 42.0 3.3 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 832 0.8 5.2 51.1 42.9 3.4 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 819 1.5 13.7 53.0 31.9 3.2 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 741 2.6 22.7 49.8 25.0 3.0 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 845 0.8 4.3 55.9 39.1 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 835 7.1 23.5 41.3 28.1 2.9 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 849 3.7 12.6 49.1 34.6 3.1 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 844 1.7 10.2 40.6 47.5 3.3 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 267 2.2 22.8 56.6 18.4 2.9 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 351 2.8 10.8 65.8 20.5 3.0 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 344 2.9 11.3 65.7 20.1 3.0 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 332 0.6 5.1 52.1 42.2 3.4 0.61 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 150 1.3 10.7 62.0 26.0 3.1 0.64 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 92 0.0 3.3 54.3 42.4 3.4 0.55 28. Guided student report preparation 95 0.0 1.1 63.2 35.8 3.3 0.50 29. Students free to express opinions 104 0.0 1.0 34.6 64.4 3.6 0.50 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 103 1.0 4.9 33.0 61.2 3.5 0.64 31. Developed abil to conduct research 91 1.1 4.4 49.5 45.1 3.4 0.63 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 154 0.6 12.3 61.0 26.0 3.1 0.63 33. Amount of work appropriate 155 1.3 6.5 65.8 26.5 3.2 0.59 34. Instructor explained expectations 156 1.3 10.9 62.2 25.6 3.1 0.64 35. Instructor helped with my problems 144 1.4 11.8 60.4 26.4 3.1 0.65 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 74 0.0 8.1 62.2 29.7 3.2 0.58 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 1139 Number of forms scanned = 875 Number of forms with at least one student response = 867 Percent completed = 76.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 467 24.7 A 896 48.0 Sophomore 386 20.5 B 691 37.1 Junior 408 21.6 C 171 9.2 Senior 538 28.5 D 19 1.0 Graduate 63 3.3 E/Fail 4 0.2 Professional 1 0.1 I 1 0.1 Other 24 1.3 Pass or Audit 83 4.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 521 27.8 Studies Program 322 17.2 2 hours 535 28.6 Required by my major 1,140 60.8 3 hours 479 25.6 Other (e.g. elective) 412 22.0 4 - 5 hours 257 13.7 6 - 7 hours 59 3.2 8 or more hours 22 1.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,043 0.5 2.3 50.1 47.1 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,780 7.8 15.2 50.4 26.6 3.0 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,885 1.8 9.9 57.4 30.9 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,777 2.5 12.2 51.7 33.7 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,001 2.2 5.6 53.2 39.0 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,903 1.4 6.1 53.8 38.7 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,971 2.6 6.9 49.8 40.7 3.3 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,686 4.6 24.7 44.0 26.7 2.9 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,024 3.1 12.0 44.6 40.4 3.2 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,044 0.7 2.2 38.9 58.2 3.5 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 1,814 0.7 3.5 51.4 44.4 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,028 1.6 5.5 47.6 45.3 3.4 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,014 4.2 17.0 44.7 34.0 3.1 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 2,003 1.5 9.6 48.0 40.8 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,606 1.7 11.6 57.5 29.2 3.1 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,940 1.4 7.8 59.9 30.9 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,828 1.8 12.5 58.2 27.6 3.1 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,995 1.5 5.0 56.8 36.7 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,957 6.3 24.9 45.3 23.5 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,044 2.8 15.0 48.6 33.5 3.1 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,036 3.5 12.2 36.0 48.3 3.3 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 425 1.4 3.3 60.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 420 2.1 8.1 61.4 28.3 3.2 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 323 2.5 9.6 62.8 25.1 3.1 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 144 5.6 9.0 52.8 32.6 3.1 0.79 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 143 4.9 7.0 56.6 31.5 3.1 0.75 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 109 4.6 5.5 40.4 49.5 3.3 0.79 28. Guided student report preparation 113 3.5 2.7 44.2 49.6 3.4 0.71 29. Students free to express opinions 116 0.0 0.9 36.2 62.9 3.6 0.50 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 115 0.9 3.5 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.61 31. Developed abil to conduct research 111 1.8 4.5 45.0 48.6 3.4 0.67 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 675 3.7 15.1 53.9 27.3 3.0 0.76 33. Amount of work appropriate 718 4.5 10.4 56.0 29.1 3.1 0.75 34. Instructor explained expectations 719 2.6 9.9 52.3 35.2 3.2 0.72 35. Instructor helped with my problems 681 2.8 13.2 48.5 35.5 3.2 0.76 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 575 1.0 5.0 59.3 34.6 3.3 0.60 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3547 Number of forms scanned = 2079 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2064 Percent completed = 58.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 549 34.3 A 652 41.8 Sophomore 436 27.3 B 627 40.2 Junior 278 17.4 C 236 15.1 Senior 222 13.9 D 31 2.0 Graduate 88 5.5 E/Fail 10 0.6 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 26 1.6 Pass or Audit 3 0.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 124 7.8 Studies Program 62 3.9 2 hours 336 21.2 Required by my major 1,402 88.6 3 hours 428 27.0 Other (e.g. elective) 118 7.5 4 - 5 hours 396 25.0 6 - 7 hours 175 11.0 8 or more hours 127 8.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,577 1.4 5.7 56.1 36.8 3.3 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,405 3.8 12.8 54.7 28.6 3.1 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,507 1.9 9.2 60.1 28.8 3.2 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,492 3.6 10.9 56.1 29.4 3.1 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,564 5.5 11.8 53.6 29.1 3.1 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,492 1.4 7.6 60.1 31.0 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,507 2.2 5.8 54.9 37.0 3.3 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,298 8.2 25.3 44.8 21.8 2.8 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,720 3.0 9.9 48.1 39.0 3.2 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,750 1.1 3.8 40.4 54.7 3.5 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 1,631 1.3 5.1 49.9 43.7 3.4 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,735 2.2 7.4 47.5 42.8 3.3 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,701 8.2 23.9 42.8 25.1 2.8 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 1,669 2.8 11.8 48.1 37.3 3.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,097 4.7 20.1 55.1 20.1 2.9 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,531 1.9 7.0 60.3 30.8 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,521 1.8 7.9 60.3 30.0 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,554 1.9 6.4 61.0 30.7 3.2 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,505 14.1 35.5 35.3 15.1 2.5 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,391 4.1 18.0 49.7 28.2 3.0 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,386 5.9 10.6 33.8 49.6 3.3 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 134 0.7 11.2 54.5 33.6 3.2 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 134 3.0 17.2 55.2 24.6 3.0 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 94 3.2 14.9 51.1 30.9 3.1 0.76 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 30 3.3 16.7 43.3 36.7 3.1 0.82 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 36 2.8 16.7 50.0 30.6 3.1 0.77 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 29. Students free to express opinions 19 5.3 0.0 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.73 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 20 15.0 0.0 45.0 40.0 3.1 1.02 31. Developed abil to conduct research 18 22.2 11.1 44.4 22.2 2.7 1.08 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 866 5.7 15.6 53.1 25.6 3.0 0.80 33. Amount of work appropriate 870 11.6 20.2 50.7 17.5 2.7 0.88 34. Instructor explained expectations 859 5.6 13.2 52.9 28.4 3.0 0.80 35. Instructor helped with my problems 853 5.2 14.3 47.1 33.4 3.1 0.82 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 872 4.1 10.8 55.8 29.2 3.1 0.75 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3195 Number of forms scanned = 3139 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1979 Percent completed = 61.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Classics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 42 22.2 A 81 44.0 Sophomore 36 19.0 B 82 44.6 Junior 30 15.9 C 17 9.2 Senior 52 27.5 D 2 1.1 Graduate 19 10.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 10 5.3 Pass or Audit 2 1.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 32 17.2 Studies Program 54 28.9 2 hours 45 24.2 Required by my major 69 36.9 3 hours 41 22.0 Other (e.g. elective) 64 34.2 4 - 5 hours 29 15.6 6 - 7 hours 16 8.6 8 or more hours 23 12.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 211 1.4 0.9 33.6 64.0 3.6 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 195 1.0 1.5 28.7 68.7 3.7 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 205 2.9 3.9 37.1 56.1 3.5 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 205 2.0 2.0 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 210 1.9 6.7 32.9 58.6 3.5 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 205 2.0 4.4 31.7 62.0 3.5 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 207 3.4 4.3 29.5 62.8 3.5 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 203 3.4 9.4 33.5 53.7 3.4 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 210 2.9 7.1 29.0 61.0 3.5 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 212 1.9 3.3 19.8 75.0 3.7 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 200 2.0 1.0 35.5 61.5 3.6 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 212 3.3 3.8 27.4 65.6 3.6 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 210 3.8 9.0 29.5 57.6 3.4 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 211 1.4 5.2 24.2 69.2 3.6 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 163 2.5 6.7 50.9 39.9 3.3 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 185 1.6 5.9 42.7 49.7 3.4 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 162 3.1 10.5 40.1 46.3 3.3 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 202 2.0 4.0 40.1 54.0 3.5 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 202 5.4 12.9 30.2 51.5 3.3 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 210 3.8 9.5 29.5 57.1 3.4 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 210 3.3 9.0 20.5 67.1 3.5 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 19 5.3 31.6 47.4 15.8 2.7 0.81 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 36 11.1 11.1 52.8 25.0 2.9 0.91 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 37 8.1 8.1 51.4 32.4 3.1 0.86 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 20 10.0 5.0 45.0 40.0 3.2 0.93 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 29. Students free to express opinions 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 259 Number of forms scanned = 213 Number of forms with at least one student response = 212 Percent completed = 81.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = French SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 65 19.6 A 161 49.2 Sophomore 71 21.4 B 124 37.9 Junior 86 25.9 C 27 8.3 Senior 78 23.5 D 8 2.4 Graduate 25 7.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 7 2.1 Pass or Audit 7 2.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 51 15.4 Studies Program 54 16.4 2 hours 120 36.3 Required by my major 195 59.1 3 hours 88 26.6 Other (e.g. elective) 81 24.5 4 - 5 hours 56 16.9 6 - 7 hours 5 1.5 8 or more hours 11 3.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 345 0.6 2.6 39.4 57.4 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 321 4.7 7.5 38.0 49.8 3.3 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 343 0.3 5.2 41.7 52.8 3.5 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 306 0.0 2.9 40.5 56.5 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 336 1.2 6.3 36.6 56.0 3.5 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 339 0.3 5.3 40.1 54.3 3.5 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 327 1.2 4.9 42.8 51.1 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 323 1.2 10.5 39.3 48.9 3.4 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 339 1.5 7.7 29.8 61.1 3.5 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 343 0.3 1.2 21.9 76.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 311 0.6 1.6 34.4 63.3 3.6 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 341 0.6 5.3 30.5 63.6 3.6 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 339 2.7 12.4 31.6 53.4 3.4 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 342 0.6 1.2 26.6 71.6 3.7 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 272 1.1 7.4 51.1 40.4 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 270 2.2 9.3 49.3 39.3 3.3 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 242 1.7 15.3 45.5 37.6 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 325 0.9 3.7 45.2 50.2 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 314 4.1 14.6 39.2 42.0 3.2 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 341 1.5 8.5 36.1 54.0 3.4 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 339 1.2 7.7 24.2 67.0 3.6 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 17 5.9 41.2 35.3 17.6 2.6 0.86 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 26 7.7 19.2 42.3 30.8 3.0 0.92 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 28 3.6 7.1 50.0 39.3 3.3 0.75 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.72 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 12.5 0.0 62.5 25.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 12.5 12.5 62.5 12.5 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 482 Number of forms scanned = 359 Number of forms with at least one student response = 347 Percent completed = 72.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 201 26.6 A 334 45.0 Sophomore 154 20.4 B 306 41.2 Junior 155 20.5 C 77 10.4 Senior 183 24.2 D 14 1.9 Graduate 51 6.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 5 0.7 I 1 0.1 Other 7 0.9 Pass or Audit 10 1.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 300 40.0 Studies Program 419 55.8 2 hours 194 25.9 Required by my major 139 18.5 3 hours 125 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 193 25.7 4 - 5 hours 85 11.3 6 - 7 hours 25 3.3 8 or more hours 21 2.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 837 0.4 3.1 55.4 41.1 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 699 8.3 16.3 49.1 26.3 2.9 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 827 4.1 10.0 56.5 29.4 3.1 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 789 2.5 8.6 52.9 36.0 3.2 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 825 2.3 5.6 54.5 37.6 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 813 2.1 4.7 58.1 35.2 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 823 2.6 10.1 55.4 32.0 3.2 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 768 4.9 19.3 47.1 28.6 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 836 3.6 13.6 47.8 34.9 3.1 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 839 0.8 2.1 38.1 58.9 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 770 0.6 2.5 55.2 41.7 3.4 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 832 1.2 5.4 52.3 41.1 3.3 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 828 7.7 18.8 42.4 31.0 3.0 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 823 2.3 12.8 51.3 33.7 3.2 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 761 2.6 9.7 58.2 29.4 3.1 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 789 2.9 17.2 54.0 25.9 3.0 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 719 3.9 25.0 49.4 21.7 2.9 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 826 2.3 6.9 58.5 32.3 3.2 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 824 8.3 30.9 39.0 21.8 2.7 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 829 5.7 18.2 44.1 32.0 3.0 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 827 5.0 13.7 40.3 41.1 3.2 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 231 6.1 28.6 48.9 16.5 2.8 0.80 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 334 4.2 17.4 58.4 20.1 2.9 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 326 4.0 16.3 57.4 22.4 3.0 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 288 2.4 9.4 47.6 40.6 3.3 0.73 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 141 5.7 13.5 51.8 29.1 3.0 0.81 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 45 0.0 4.4 42.2 53.3 3.5 0.59 28. Guided student report preparation 45 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 58 1.7 5.2 29.3 63.8 3.6 0.68 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 58 0.0 5.2 32.8 62.1 3.6 0.60 31. Developed abil to conduct research 51 0.0 5.9 45.1 49.0 3.4 0.61 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 20 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 33. Amount of work appropriate 21 4.8 4.8 61.9 28.6 3.1 0.73 34. Instructor explained expectations 20 5.0 10.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.81 35. Instructor helped with my problems 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 20 5.0 10.0 45.0 40.0 3.2 0.83 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1334 Number of forms scanned = 846 Number of forms with at least one student response = 841 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = German SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 23 13.9 A 79 48.5 Sophomore 33 20.0 B 61 37.4 Junior 52 31.5 C 17 10.4 Senior 40 24.2 D 5 3.1 Graduate 14 8.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 0.6 Other 3 1.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 12.7 Studies Program 37 22.6 2 hours 50 30.3 Required by my major 83 50.6 3 hours 49 29.7 Other (e.g. elective) 44 26.8 4 - 5 hours 32 19.4 6 - 7 hours 9 5.5 8 or more hours 4 2.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 182 0.5 1.6 45.1 52.7 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 178 1.7 6.7 44.9 46.6 3.4 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 183 1.1 6.6 49.2 43.2 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 163 0.0 0.6 44.2 55.2 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 171 0.6 2.3 44.4 52.6 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 182 1.1 7.1 37.9 53.8 3.4 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 168 0.6 3.6 42.3 53.6 3.5 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 167 0.0 4.2 42.5 53.3 3.5 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 184 0.5 7.1 37.0 55.4 3.5 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 184 0.0 2.2 23.9 73.9 3.7 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 171 0.0 0.0 38.6 61.4 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 183 1.1 3.3 36.1 59.6 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 181 1.1 9.9 38.1 50.8 3.4 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 183 1.1 1.1 26.2 71.6 3.7 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 145 0.7 6.2 51.0 42.1 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 153 2.0 8.5 45.1 44.4 3.3 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 131 2.3 12.2 48.1 37.4 3.2 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 170 0.0 2.4 51.8 45.9 3.4 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 169 1.8 14.2 40.8 43.2 3.3 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 183 2.2 9.3 38.8 49.7 3.4 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 182 0.0 6.0 27.5 66.5 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 22.2 0.0 22.2 55.6 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 11.1 16.7 38.9 33.3 2.9 1.00 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 5.9 0.0 41.2 52.9 3.4 0.80 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 16.7 33.3 0.0 50.0 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 20.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 38. Question 38 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 39. Question 39 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 43. Question 43 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 44. Question 44 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 240 Number of forms scanned = 191 Number of forms with at least one student response = 184 Percent completed = 76.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 170 21.7 A 363 46.6 Sophomore 145 18.5 B 340 43.6 Junior 207 26.4 C 69 8.9 Senior 200 25.5 D 3 0.4 Graduate 59 7.5 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 0.1 Other 4 0.5 Pass or Audit 2 0.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 310 39.7 Studies Program 316 40.7 2 hours 256 32.8 Required by my major 311 40.0 3 hours 128 16.4 Other (e.g. elective) 150 19.3 4 - 5 hours 63 8.1 6 - 7 hours 16 2.1 8 or more hours 7 0.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 835 0.8 6.9 51.7 40.5 3.3 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 777 4.1 13.9 57.9 24.1 3.0 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 800 3.6 11.9 55.0 29.5 3.1 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 763 3.5 11.5 51.2 33.7 3.2 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 798 3.8 7.1 50.8 38.3 3.2 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 784 2.4 5.7 56.5 35.3 3.2 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 785 2.4 6.1 53.5 38.0 3.3 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 743 5.7 19.5 47.6 27.2 3.0 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 849 4.7 12.4 44.6 38.3 3.2 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 852 0.7 4.1 41.3 53.9 3.5 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 746 0.9 4.8 52.8 41.4 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 846 3.0 9.3 46.2 41.5 3.3 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 836 7.2 20.7 39.7 32.4 3.0 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 840 3.5 12.9 50.0 33.7 3.1 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 676 2.1 16.3 57.2 24.4 3.0 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 798 2.6 12.3 58.4 26.7 3.1 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 766 2.3 16.1 56.5 25.1 3.0 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 839 2.0 7.9 58.0 32.1 3.2 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 828 8.5 27.9 40.7 22.9 2.8 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 842 5.8 17.1 48.2 28.9 3.0 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 839 5.6 13.7 35.2 45.5 3.2 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 278 3.2 9.4 65.5 21.9 3.1 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 270 4.4 14.1 63.0 18.5 3.0 0.71 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 253 7.1 11.5 57.3 24.1 3.0 0.80 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 133 6.0 8.3 60.9 24.8 3.0 0.76 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 140 2.9 8.6 58.6 30.0 3.2 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 42 2.4 7.1 64.3 26.2 3.1 0.65 28. Guided student report preparation 41 2.4 2.4 63.4 31.7 3.2 0.62 29. Students free to express opinions 56 1.8 0.0 57.1 41.1 3.4 0.59 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 55 1.8 7.3 60.0 30.9 3.2 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 52 1.9 5.8 67.3 25.0 3.2 0.61 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 222 2.7 12.2 46.4 38.7 3.2 0.76 33. Amount of work appropriate 225 4.9 10.2 47.6 37.3 3.2 0.80 34. Instructor explained expectations 225 2.2 13.8 43.6 40.4 3.2 0.76 35. Instructor helped with my problems 224 3.1 6.7 49.1 41.1 3.3 0.73 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 180 2.8 10.0 48.3 38.9 3.2 0.74 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1273 Number of forms scanned = 859 Number of forms with at least one student response = 856 Percent completed = 67.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 375 30.4 A 536 43.9 Sophomore 208 16.9 B 574 47.0 Junior 237 19.2 C 92 7.5 Senior 317 25.7 D 4 0.3 Graduate 76 6.2 E/Fail 2 0.2 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 21 1.7 Pass or Audit 13 1.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 307 24.9 Studies Program 516 42.1 2 hours 383 31.1 Required by my major 467 38.1 3 hours 294 23.9 Other (e.g. elective) 242 19.8 4 - 5 hours 158 12.8 6 - 7 hours 47 3.8 8 or more hours 43 3.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,387 0.4 2.1 47.4 50.1 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,333 2.2 8.0 49.4 40.4 3.3 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,362 1.0 7.2 52.2 39.6 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,286 0.5 2.9 43.9 52.6 3.5 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,370 2.3 8.1 45.0 44.6 3.3 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,371 0.9 4.6 50.0 44.6 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,365 2.6 10.8 46.4 40.2 3.2 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,341 1.3 7.6 47.4 43.6 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,382 1.3 5.9 37.6 55.1 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,385 0.2 0.8 24.0 74.9 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 1,213 0.6 3.4 46.1 50.0 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,360 0.7 3.2 43.2 52.9 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,377 2.4 9.9 38.1 49.7 3.4 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 1,338 4.1 14.8 38.0 43.0 3.2 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,245 1.2 8.3 54.3 36.2 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,298 0.8 8.9 53.2 37.1 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,119 1.7 17.9 47.6 32.8 3.1 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,351 0.8 3.4 50.8 45.0 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,347 3.8 17.0 40.8 38.4 3.1 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,377 1.7 8.7 40.5 49.1 3.4 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,374 1.6 6.8 28.2 63.4 3.5 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 207 5.8 15.9 55.1 23.2 3.0 0.79 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 462 3.7 13.9 55.6 26.8 3.1 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 480 1.9 9.0 55.4 33.8 3.2 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 140 4.3 9.3 50.7 35.7 3.2 0.77 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 230 2.2 5.7 51.3 40.9 3.3 0.68 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 74 2.7 5.4 33.8 58.1 3.5 0.73 28. Guided student report preparation 79 2.5 7.6 39.2 50.6 3.4 0.74 29. Students free to express opinions 93 3.2 1.1 32.3 63.4 3.6 0.68 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 88 2.3 1.1 36.4 60.2 3.5 0.64 31. Developed abil to conduct research 80 2.5 7.5 36.3 53.8 3.4 0.74 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 77 6.5 19.5 42.9 31.2 3.0 0.88 33. Amount of work appropriate 77 3.9 11.7 58.4 26.0 3.1 0.73 34. Instructor explained expectations 77 11.7 15.6 44.2 28.6 2.9 0.95 35. Instructor helped with my problems 75 10.7 16.0 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.92 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 41 14.6 19.5 43.9 22.0 2.7 0.98 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 2183 Number of forms scanned = 1436 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1399 Percent completed = 64.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 982 38.8 A 890 35.8 Sophomore 632 25.0 B 941 37.9 Junior 443 17.5 C 456 18.4 Senior 339 13.4 D 109 4.4 Graduate 115 4.5 E/Fail 21 0.8 Professional 1 0.0 I 2 0.1 Other 20 0.8 Pass or Audit 64 2.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 438 17.4 Studies Program 420 16.8 2 hours 632 25.1 Required by my major 1,776 71.1 3 hours 662 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 303 12.1 4 - 5 hours 511 20.3 6 - 7 hours 177 7.0 8 or more hours 98 3.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,747 1.9 4.7 52.9 40.5 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,669 7.5 16.6 50.3 25.7 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,729 2.4 6.8 51.7 39.1 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,694 4.0 11.5 45.0 39.6 3.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,735 3.5 9.5 45.6 41.4 3.2 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,709 1.1 3.9 51.9 43.1 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,737 2.4 3.8 45.1 48.6 3.4 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,658 5.2 20.7 45.3 28.9 3.0 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,759 5.7 10.0 41.0 43.3 3.2 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,760 0.9 3.0 37.0 59.0 3.5 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 2,536 1.5 3.9 45.3 49.3 3.4 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,747 2.8 7.9 41.7 47.6 3.3 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,687 9.0 22.4 39.3 29.3 2.9 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 2,722 4.2 13.3 44.8 37.7 3.2 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,957 4.0 18.7 55.1 22.2 3.0 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,677 3.3 9.6 54.2 32.9 3.2 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,706 2.8 8.0 52.5 36.7 3.2 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,714 2.8 8.0 54.8 34.3 3.2 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,561 14.4 36.7 32.2 16.8 2.5 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,779 5.9 16.4 44.3 33.3 3.1 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,768 7.6 11.2 29.7 51.5 3.3 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 303 5.0 13.9 52.5 28.7 3.0 0.79 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 347 8.4 20.2 47.3 24.2 2.9 0.87 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 241 6.6 14.5 48.5 30.3 3.0 0.85 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 133 6.0 17.3 43.6 33.1 3.0 0.87 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 128 2.3 14.1 50.8 32.8 3.1 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 65 1.5 3.1 52.3 43.1 3.4 0.63 28. Guided student report preparation 65 1.5 6.2 50.8 41.5 3.3 0.66 29. Students free to express opinions 71 2.8 4.2 39.4 53.5 3.4 0.71 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 70 2.9 8.6 45.7 42.9 3.3 0.74 31. Developed abil to conduct research 66 4.5 10.6 47.0 37.9 3.2 0.80 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 354 2.0 3.7 45.2 49.2 3.4 0.66 33. Amount of work appropriate 354 1.4 4.2 49.4 44.9 3.4 0.64 34. Instructor explained expectations 355 2.5 5.9 47.6 43.9 3.3 0.70 35. Instructor helped with my problems 355 2.5 5.6 43.7 48.2 3.4 0.71 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 199 2.5 2.0 52.8 42.7 3.4 0.65 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 303 6.3 7.9 10.6 39.3 36.0 3.9 1.16 38. Question 38 306 2.3 2.9 4.9 26.8 63.1 4.5 0.89 39. Question 39 299 5.7 13.0 10.0 34.8 36.5 3.8 1.21 40. Question 40 304 3.6 6.3 8.2 29.3 52.6 4.2 1.07 41. Question 41 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 42. Question 42 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 46. Question 46 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 49. Question 49 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 4818 Number of forms scanned = 2882 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2822 Percent completed = 58.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 323 30.4 A 436 41.3 Sophomore 284 26.7 B 446 42.3 Junior 211 19.8 C 134 12.7 Senior 211 19.8 D 13 1.2 Graduate 29 2.7 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 0 0.0 I 2 0.2 Other 6 0.6 Pass or Audit 23 2.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 312 29.3 Studies Program 611 58.4 2 hours 333 31.3 Required by my major 187 17.9 3 hours 239 22.5 Other (e.g. elective) 249 23.8 4 - 5 hours 135 12.7 6 - 7 hours 32 3.0 8 or more hours 13 1.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,206 0.3 2.5 52.4 44.8 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,192 2.6 9.1 46.7 41.5 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,162 1.1 8.1 49.1 41.7 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,138 0.7 3.9 48.4 47.0 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,190 1.6 6.7 46.3 45.4 3.4 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,170 1.3 5.2 49.5 44.0 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,191 1.0 5.0 51.1 42.8 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,165 2.5 10.8 49.5 37.2 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,208 2.2 8.7 44.2 45.0 3.3 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,209 0.2 1.3 33.1 65.4 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 1,131 0.6 1.9 47.1 50.3 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,205 1.3 4.9 45.0 48.8 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,194 5.9 16.0 39.3 38.9 3.1 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 1,204 1.2 5.9 42.2 50.7 3.4 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,075 1.6 6.9 52.7 38.8 3.3 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,157 1.9 8.1 48.3 41.7 3.3 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,099 1.8 14.0 48.7 35.5 3.2 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,182 2.3 5.8 51.9 39.9 3.3 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,158 10.5 27.3 34.3 27.9 2.8 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,196 4.4 15.2 43.2 37.1 3.1 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,190 2.6 10.0 31.3 56.1 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 390 3.8 14.1 58.2 23.8 3.0 0.73 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 467 4.5 17.6 52.7 25.3 3.0 0.78 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 411 2.7 8.8 58.4 30.2 3.2 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 185 1.6 14.6 49.7 34.1 3.2 0.73 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 191 3.7 15.2 48.2 33.0 3.1 0.79 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 54 3.7 9.3 42.6 44.4 3.3 0.79 28. Guided student report preparation 56 5.4 5.4 53.6 35.7 3.2 0.77 29. Students free to express opinions 63 0.0 1.6 39.7 58.7 3.6 0.53 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 62 1.6 1.6 48.4 48.4 3.4 0.62 31. Developed abil to conduct research 53 0.0 5.7 52.8 41.5 3.4 0.59 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 28 3.6 0.0 53.6 42.9 3.4 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 34. Instructor explained expectations 28 3.6 7.1 50.0 39.3 3.3 0.75 35. Instructor helped with my problems 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1790 Number of forms scanned = 1221 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1212 Percent completed = 67.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 169 19.7 A 363 43.2 Sophomore 180 21.0 B 376 44.8 Junior 198 23.1 C 84 10.0 Senior 230 26.8 D 4 0.5 Graduate 69 8.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.2 I 1 0.1 Other 9 1.1 Pass or Audit 12 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 216 25.5 Studies Program 178 21.1 2 hours 254 30.0 Required by my major 408 48.3 3 hours 242 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 258 30.6 4 - 5 hours 93 11.0 6 - 7 hours 28 3.3 8 or more hours 14 1.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 900 0.2 2.1 49.9 47.8 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 875 3.5 10.6 48.7 37.1 3.2 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 884 2.0 8.0 55.2 34.7 3.2 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 857 1.5 7.4 51.8 39.3 3.3 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 885 1.4 7.1 49.0 42.5 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 890 1.5 5.3 51.5 41.8 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 893 0.7 4.8 50.4 44.1 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 859 1.6 14.6 51.5 32.4 3.1 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 902 2.7 9.9 47.9 39.6 3.2 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 905 0.1 1.1 36.8 62.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 834 0.2 3.1 48.1 48.6 3.4 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 900 0.7 3.9 46.6 48.9 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 896 3.3 13.1 43.0 40.6 3.2 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 894 1.0 6.2 44.2 48.7 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 851 1.3 7.8 57.9 33.0 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 863 1.6 10.3 55.6 32.4 3.2 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 790 2.3 17.0 52.4 28.4 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 890 1.0 2.6 56.1 40.3 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 880 4.2 19.1 45.7 31.0 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 897 1.9 11.7 48.5 37.9 3.2 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 895 1.9 12.2 37.7 48.3 3.3 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 148 3.4 15.5 58.1 23.0 3.0 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 208 2.9 13.5 57.2 26.4 3.1 0.72 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 205 1.0 11.7 58.0 29.3 3.2 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 114 3.5 11.4 55.3 29.8 3.1 0.74 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 84 2.4 13.1 53.6 31.0 3.1 0.72 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 60 0.0 5.0 51.7 43.3 3.4 0.58 28. Guided student report preparation 62 0.0 6.5 50.0 43.5 3.4 0.61 29. Students free to express opinions 67 0.0 1.5 37.3 61.2 3.6 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 67 1.5 1.5 46.3 50.7 3.5 0.61 31. Developed abil to conduct research 57 1.8 5.3 45.6 47.4 3.4 0.67 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 33. Amount of work appropriate 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 34. Instructor explained expectations 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 35. Instructor helped with my problems 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1519 Number of forms scanned = 918 Number of forms with at least one student response = 907 Percent completed = 59.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 578 28.9 A 839 42.7 Sophomore 384 19.2 B 758 38.6 Junior 420 21.0 C 221 11.3 Senior 479 24.0 D 18 0.9 Graduate 128 6.4 E/Fail 3 0.2 Professional 3 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 8 0.4 Pass or Audit 124 6.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 737 37.0 Studies Program 507 25.7 2 hours 595 29.8 Required by my major 1,064 53.8 3 hours 415 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 405 20.5 4 - 5 hours 176 8.8 6 - 7 hours 38 1.9 8 or more hours 33 1.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,145 0.2 1.4 43.4 55.0 3.5 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,930 4.4 12.4 48.2 35.0 3.1 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,979 1.0 6.7 50.8 41.5 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,954 1.8 6.4 43.9 48.0 3.4 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,123 0.8 3.9 43.7 51.6 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,995 0.6 3.5 45.8 50.2 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,084 0.2 2.7 43.1 53.9 3.5 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,834 3.5 13.6 42.3 40.6 3.2 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,152 1.2 6.4 38.8 53.6 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,154 0.2 1.4 33.8 64.7 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 1,984 0.3 1.6 41.9 56.3 3.5 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,142 0.5 3.4 38.9 57.3 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,128 2.7 11.3 38.6 47.4 3.3 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 2,136 0.9 5.8 39.8 53.5 3.5 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,895 0.9 7.1 55.6 36.4 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,051 1.0 7.5 52.4 39.1 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,913 1.4 12.9 50.5 35.2 3.2 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,115 0.8 2.5 48.1 48.7 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,077 3.7 19.8 43.5 32.9 3.1 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,128 1.8 9.4 41.1 47.7 3.3 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,121 1.9 8.6 28.2 61.2 3.5 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 495 1.2 5.5 58.4 34.9 3.3 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 519 1.2 11.2 54.1 33.5 3.2 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 422 1.7 11.8 56.6 29.9 3.1 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 232 2.2 12.9 52.6 32.3 3.2 0.72 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 217 2.8 7.8 54.4 35.0 3.2 0.70 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 91 0.0 3.3 51.6 45.1 3.4 0.56 28. Guided student report preparation 97 0.0 4.1 52.6 43.3 3.4 0.57 29. Students free to express opinions 118 0.0 0.8 40.7 58.5 3.6 0.51 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 114 1.8 2.6 36.8 58.8 3.5 0.64 31. Developed abil to conduct research 88 1.1 5.7 42.0 51.1 3.4 0.66 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 497 1.4 6.8 41.4 50.3 3.4 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 510 1.0 2.5 43.7 52.7 3.5 0.60 34. Instructor explained expectations 511 0.2 3.1 40.7 56.0 3.5 0.57 35. Instructor helped with my problems 482 0.4 6.8 39.6 53.1 3.5 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 320 0.3 2.8 45.0 51.9 3.5 0.57 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3196 Number of forms scanned = 2682 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2168 Percent completed = 67.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Russian and Eastern Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 30 14.6 A 108 52.7 Sophomore 38 18.4 B 69 33.7 Junior 51 24.8 C 16 7.8 Senior 69 33.5 D 4 2.0 Graduate 13 6.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 5 2.4 Pass or Audit 8 3.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 42 20.6 Studies Program 63 30.4 2 hours 51 25.0 Required by my major 54 26.1 3 hours 55 27.0 Other (e.g. elective) 90 43.5 4 - 5 hours 39 19.1 6 - 7 hours 12 5.9 8 or more hours 5 2.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 225 0.4 0.9 36.4 62.2 3.6 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 222 3.2 5.9 36.9 54.1 3.4 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 220 2.3 0.5 40.9 56.4 3.5 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 205 0.0 0.0 33.2 66.8 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 220 0.9 1.8 34.5 62.7 3.6 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 222 0.9 2.7 33.3 63.1 3.6 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 217 1.8 5.5 33.6 59.0 3.5 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 216 1.9 1.4 38.9 57.9 3.5 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 224 0.9 2.7 33.0 63.4 3.6 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 224 0.0 0.0 15.2 84.8 3.8 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 214 0.0 0.9 33.6 65.4 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 224 0.4 1.3 32.6 65.6 3.6 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 225 1.8 3.1 32.9 62.2 3.6 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 224 0.0 4.0 27.2 68.8 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 199 2.0 2.5 38.2 57.3 3.5 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 195 1.5 6.2 40.0 52.3 3.4 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 167 2.4 10.8 43.1 43.7 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 214 1.4 0.9 41.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 214 1.9 6.5 34.6 57.0 3.5 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 222 1.4 3.2 30.2 65.3 3.6 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 220 1.4 3.2 19.1 76.4 3.7 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 26 7.7 15.4 34.6 42.3 3.1 0.95 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 51 5.9 11.8 49.0 33.3 3.1 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 54 3.7 0.0 53.7 42.6 3.4 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 54 3.7 0.0 35.2 61.1 3.5 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 302 Number of forms scanned = 225 Number of forms with at least one student response = 225 Percent completed = 74.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 303 22.2 A 692 51.2 Sophomore 188 13.8 B 497 36.8 Junior 329 24.1 C 110 8.1 Senior 497 36.4 D 6 0.4 Graduate 42 3.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 7 0.5 Pass or Audit 47 3.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 533 39.4 Studies Program 417 30.8 2 hours 403 29.8 Required by my major 409 30.2 3 hours 258 19.1 Other (e.g. elective) 529 39.0 4 - 5 hours 118 8.7 6 - 7 hours 26 1.9 8 or more hours 16 1.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,448 0.4 1.8 46.2 51.6 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,419 2.2 9.4 50.2 38.1 3.2 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,405 0.9 8.4 52.6 38.1 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,391 2.2 7.5 43.6 46.7 3.3 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,433 2.4 4.9 42.6 50.2 3.4 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,390 1.2 4.0 47.9 47.0 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,427 1.3 6.0 46.0 46.7 3.4 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,270 2.3 13.9 45.4 38.3 3.2 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,449 3.8 10.1 40.2 45.8 3.3 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,447 0.3 2.1 33.6 64.1 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 1,290 0.8 2.9 45.3 51.1 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,439 0.9 3.6 42.3 53.2 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,435 4.0 13.7 36.0 46.3 3.2 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 1,436 1.0 4.2 40.9 53.8 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,395 1.1 5.8 50.8 42.2 3.3 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,401 1.9 8.7 53.3 36.1 3.2 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,300 2.0 16.6 49.8 31.5 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,430 1.7 4.2 49.6 44.5 3.4 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,408 4.5 21.2 41.3 33.0 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,434 3.1 11.6 42.1 43.2 3.3 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,430 4.3 9.9 29.0 56.9 3.4 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 262 2.3 9.9 55.3 32.4 3.2 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 345 1.2 4.1 54.5 40.3 3.3 0.61 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 299 1.0 5.0 58.5 35.5 3.3 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 178 1.1 6.2 51.1 41.6 3.3 0.64 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 181 2.2 8.3 48.1 41.4 3.3 0.71 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 61 1.6 4.9 45.9 47.5 3.4 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 65 0.0 6.2 47.7 46.2 3.4 0.61 29. Students free to express opinions 76 1.3 7.9 28.9 61.8 3.5 0.70 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 76 0.0 7.9 38.2 53.9 3.5 0.64 31. Developed abil to conduct research 70 1.4 4.3 50.0 44.3 3.4 0.64 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 31 0.0 6.5 35.5 58.1 3.5 0.63 33. Amount of work appropriate 31 0.0 3.2 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.57 34. Instructor explained expectations 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 35. Instructor helped with my problems 31 3.2 0.0 35.5 61.3 3.5 0.68 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 30 3.3 0.0 40.0 56.7 3.5 0.68 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 2298 Number of forms scanned = 1726 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1452 Percent completed = 63.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Spanish and Italian SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 245 17.2 A 790 56.4 Sophomore 358 25.1 B 451 32.2 Junior 382 26.8 C 123 8.8 Senior 350 24.6 D 15 1.1 Graduate 74 5.2 E/Fail 4 0.3 Professional 2 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 14 1.0 Pass or Audit 18 1.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 378 26.7 Studies Program 293 20.9 2 hours 362 25.6 Required by my major 877 62.5 3 hours 366 25.9 Other (e.g. elective) 234 16.7 4 - 5 hours 218 15.4 6 - 7 hours 55 3.9 8 or more hours 35 2.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,621 0.4 2.0 44.5 53.2 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,599 2.0 7.7 44.6 45.7 3.3 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,613 2.3 9.1 47.1 41.6 3.3 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,561 0.9 4.7 46.6 47.9 3.4 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,601 1.2 5.4 45.5 48.0 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,603 0.5 4.0 48.3 47.2 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,595 1.5 5.8 45.9 46.8 3.4 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,588 1.8 8.7 45.7 43.9 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,615 1.2 5.5 39.9 53.4 3.5 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,615 0.1 0.7 28.0 71.1 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 1,508 0.2 1.6 40.2 58.0 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,608 0.7 2.9 39.9 56.6 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,602 2.7 13.2 38.4 45.7 3.3 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 1,618 0.6 2.0 30.9 66.5 3.6 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,399 1.4 8.4 53.0 37.2 3.3 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,404 2.1 11.4 52.3 34.3 3.2 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,282 2.4 17.7 49.1 30.8 3.1 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,537 1.4 4.9 54.6 39.1 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,514 5.0 19.9 43.3 31.9 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,591 3.0 12.9 47.5 36.6 3.2 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,589 2.1 7.0 28.8 62.1 3.5 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 159 6.9 22.6 40.9 29.6 2.9 0.89 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 217 6.5 21.7 49.8 22.1 2.9 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 239 3.8 7.9 56.5 31.8 3.2 0.72 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 153 5.9 7.8 47.1 39.2 3.2 0.82 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 115 7.0 12.2 47.0 33.9 3.1 0.86 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 54 0.0 13.0 48.1 38.9 3.3 0.68 28. Guided student report preparation 51 0.0 13.7 43.1 43.1 3.3 0.70 29. Students free to express opinions 54 0.0 5.6 40.7 53.7 3.5 0.61 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 55 5.5 9.1 43.6 41.8 3.2 0.83 31. Developed abil to conduct research 48 8.3 14.6 45.8 31.3 3.0 0.90 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 236 8.9 18.6 45.8 26.7 2.9 0.90 33. Amount of work appropriate 237 2.5 5.1 55.3 37.1 3.3 0.67 34. Instructor explained expectations 236 2.1 8.9 49.6 39.4 3.3 0.71 35. Instructor helped with my problems 221 5.0 11.3 46.6 37.1 3.2 0.81 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 135 3.0 10.4 47.4 39.3 3.2 0.75 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 45. Question 45 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 2214 Number of forms scanned = 1642 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1628 Percent completed = 73.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Decision Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 262 63.0 Sophomore 3 0.7 B 131 31.5 Junior 139 33.3 C 19 4.6 Senior 220 52.6 D 1 0.2 Graduate 56 13.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 0.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 187 44.6 Studies Program 12 2.9 2 hours 123 29.4 Required by my major 321 77.2 3 hours 69 16.5 Other (e.g. elective) 83 20.0 4 - 5 hours 31 7.4 6 - 7 hours 7 1.7 8 or more hours 2 0.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 443 1.1 5.0 50.8 43.1 3.4 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 431 10.2 16.5 44.1 29.2 2.9 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 427 2.1 10.1 52.2 35.6 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 429 1.4 9.3 53.4 35.9 3.2 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 440 4.3 5.7 45.5 44.5 3.3 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 431 1.9 6.0 52.2 39.9 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 438 1.6 5.7 48.9 43.8 3.3 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 425 3.3 17.9 46.1 32.7 3.1 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 445 5.6 14.6 46.7 33.0 3.1 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 445 1.3 4.3 42.5 51.9 3.4 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 416 1.0 1.9 51.2 45.9 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 443 2.5 7.4 49.2 40.9 3.3 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 440 7.5 23.9 38.6 30.0 2.9 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 443 2.9 13.3 51.9 31.8 3.1 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 376 2.9 17.8 56.1 23.1 3.0 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 440 1.6 12.0 57.5 28.9 3.1 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 437 1.6 9.6 57.7 31.1 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 444 1.4 8.8 57.7 32.2 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 434 6.5 31.8 36.9 24.9 2.8 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 445 6.3 19.8 45.2 28.8 3.0 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 445 6.7 15.5 37.8 40.0 3.1 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 44 2.3 2.3 36.4 59.1 0.0 3.5 0.66 38. Question 38 44 4.5 2.3 29.5 63.6 0.0 3.5 0.76 39. Question 39 44 2.3 2.3 27.3 68.2 0.0 3.6 0.65 40. Question 40 44 2.3 9.1 45.5 43.2 0.0 3.3 0.73 41. Question 41 44 2.3 9.1 36.4 52.3 0.0 3.4 0.75 42. Question 42 44 2.3 2.3 27.3 68.2 0.0 3.6 0.65 43. Question 43 43 4.7 14.0 51.2 30.2 0.0 3.1 0.80 44. Question 44 43 9.3 27.9 46.5 16.3 0.0 2.7 0.86 Number of forms preslugged = at least 703 Number of forms scanned = 451 Number of forms with at least one student response = 448 Percent completed = 63.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 230 14.9 A 699 45.5 Sophomore 297 19.3 B 630 41.0 Junior 383 24.8 C 173 11.3 Senior 506 32.8 D 8 0.5 Graduate 101 6.5 E/Fail 2 0.1 Professional 3 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 22 1.4 Pass or Audit 23 1.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 460 29.9 Studies Program 146 9.5 2 hours 507 32.9 Required by my major 1,148 74.7 3 hours 342 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 243 15.8 4 - 5 hours 165 10.7 6 - 7 hours 38 2.5 8 or more hours 27 1.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,635 0.4 2.2 50.5 46.9 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,593 6.9 18.0 46.9 28.2 3.0 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,614 1.2 5.8 51.5 41.4 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,576 1.6 5.1 47.2 46.1 3.4 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,621 0.7 3.8 48.4 47.1 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,604 0.8 3.4 53.6 42.2 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,616 0.7 4.9 51.1 43.4 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,527 2.0 15.8 51.9 30.3 3.1 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,638 2.4 9.1 42.7 45.8 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,639 0.4 2.3 33.9 63.4 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 1,512 0.6 1.9 45.3 52.2 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,633 1.1 5.9 44.2 48.8 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,616 4.0 17.1 44.2 34.7 3.1 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 1,628 1.1 4.3 46.1 48.5 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,362 2.0 11.2 61.7 25.2 3.1 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,600 1.3 6.9 56.3 35.6 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,574 1.1 9.0 56.7 33.2 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,620 1.2 4.4 55.7 38.6 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,589 6.6 28.8 41.7 22.9 2.8 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,622 2.1 12.7 46.8 38.4 3.2 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,614 3.2 10.1 31.7 55.0 3.4 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 135 0.7 12.6 59.3 27.4 3.1 0.64 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 176 1.1 9.1 60.2 29.5 3.2 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 155 0.6 9.0 61.3 29.0 3.2 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 64 1.6 7.8 54.7 35.9 3.3 0.67 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 64 1.6 9.4 54.7 34.4 3.2 0.68 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 42 0.0 2.4 69.0 28.6 3.3 0.50 28. Guided student report preparation 42 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.56 29. Students free to express opinions 53 0.0 5.7 60.4 34.0 3.3 0.57 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 53 0.0 3.8 56.6 39.6 3.4 0.56 31. Developed abil to conduct research 41 0.0 2.4 63.4 34.1 3.3 0.52 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 33. Amount of work appropriate 25 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 34. Instructor explained expectations 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 35. Instructor helped with my problems 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 38. Question 38 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 41. Question 41 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 44. Question 44 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 3.0 . 46. Question 46 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 48. Question 48 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 2495 Number of forms scanned = 1653 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1643 Percent completed = 65.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Finance SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 493 53.1 Sophomore 2 0.2 B 339 36.5 Junior 317 33.9 C 78 8.4 Senior 515 55.1 D 5 0.5 Graduate 96 10.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 3 0.3 Pass or Audit 14 1.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 320 34.3 Studies Program 9 1.0 2 hours 334 35.8 Required by my major 759 81.5 3 hours 201 21.5 Other (e.g. elective) 163 17.5 4 - 5 hours 58 6.2 6 - 7 hours 16 1.7 8 or more hours 4 0.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 996 0.8 3.6 50.7 44.9 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 964 4.3 12.8 54.3 28.7 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 980 1.3 8.3 51.8 38.6 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 997 1.3 4.2 49.7 44.7 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 991 1.4 3.1 48.8 46.6 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 974 1.2 4.0 50.6 44.1 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 994 2.6 6.9 45.1 45.4 3.3 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 952 2.5 18.8 49.6 29.1 3.1 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 995 4.0 10.4 45.3 40.3 3.2 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 993 1.6 3.0 35.5 59.8 3.5 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 911 0.3 3.0 50.1 46.7 3.4 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 991 2.7 6.8 47.2 43.3 3.3 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 985 4.7 14.8 42.3 38.2 3.1 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 987 1.1 11.7 52.0 35.3 3.2 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 804 2.4 13.4 57.5 26.7 3.1 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 974 1.6 6.3 55.4 36.7 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 971 1.6 5.8 57.0 35.6 3.3 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 983 1.3 4.5 53.4 40.8 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 974 4.2 18.0 47.9 29.9 3.0 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 993 2.7 10.2 43.2 43.9 3.3 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 990 5.9 10.7 34.4 49.0 3.3 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 40 0.0 2.5 35.0 62.5 3.6 0.55 33. Amount of work appropriate 39 0.0 0.0 35.9 64.1 3.6 0.49 34. Instructor explained expectations 39 2.6 2.6 28.2 66.7 3.6 0.68 35. Instructor helped with my problems 35 0.0 2.9 42.9 54.3 3.5 0.56 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1464 Number of forms scanned = 1006 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1002 Percent completed = 68.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Management SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 594 56.8 Sophomore 34 3.2 B 401 38.3 Junior 321 30.3 C 36 3.4 Senior 565 53.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 136 12.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 5 0.5 Pass or Audit 15 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 427 40.6 Studies Program 43 4.1 2 hours 302 28.7 Required by my major 878 83.1 3 hours 176 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 136 12.9 4 - 5 hours 99 9.4 6 - 7 hours 21 2.0 8 or more hours 27 2.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,122 0.4 2.0 51.2 46.3 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,062 2.6 11.6 53.4 32.4 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,048 1.6 8.5 57.4 32.4 3.2 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,055 1.0 4.9 52.4 41.6 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,099 1.2 3.7 50.3 44.8 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,064 1.2 5.5 53.3 39.9 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,093 0.2 2.1 47.8 50.0 3.5 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 978 1.9 13.7 51.7 32.6 3.2 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,121 2.9 6.6 43.7 46.7 3.3 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,121 0.3 2.1 35.1 62.5 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 1,029 0.5 1.7 50.3 47.4 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,110 1.1 2.3 45.9 50.6 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,113 3.4 9.6 46.0 41.0 3.2 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 1,099 0.7 7.3 41.9 50.1 3.4 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,027 1.2 7.7 58.0 33.1 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,079 1.4 6.9 56.0 35.8 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,049 2.1 9.2 54.2 34.5 3.2 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,107 1.0 3.4 55.6 39.9 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,091 3.3 18.8 47.7 30.2 3.0 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,113 2.1 9.0 48.1 40.9 3.3 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,110 2.6 6.8 36.2 54.3 3.4 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 28. Guided student report preparation 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 29. Students free to express opinions 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 31. Developed abil to conduct research 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1664 Number of forms scanned = 1132 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1125 Percent completed = 67.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Marketing SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.1 A 572 62.2 Sophomore 78 8.5 B 307 33.4 Junior 214 23.4 C 28 3.0 Senior 537 58.8 D 1 0.1 Graduate 70 7.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 3 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 11 1.2 Pass or Audit 11 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 389 42.6 Studies Program 18 2.0 2 hours 302 33.0 Required by my major 716 78.1 3 hours 144 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 183 20.0 4 - 5 hours 65 7.1 6 - 7 hours 10 1.1 8 or more hours 4 0.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 996 0.2 1.0 42.8 56.0 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 937 3.9 13.3 47.5 35.2 3.1 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 940 1.1 5.3 50.3 43.3 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 976 0.8 4.5 45.6 49.1 3.4 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 987 0.4 3.7 43.7 52.2 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 947 1.2 4.5 46.3 48.0 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 984 0.8 4.1 41.1 54.1 3.5 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 887 1.4 11.4 47.8 39.5 3.3 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 996 1.0 7.0 36.6 55.3 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 996 0.2 1.5 30.2 68.1 3.7 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 918 0.3 1.3 38.8 59.6 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 992 0.5 2.5 38.7 58.3 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 990 2.7 9.6 36.1 51.6 3.4 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 995 0.5 2.2 34.5 62.8 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 913 1.1 6.8 51.4 40.7 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 976 0.7 5.1 51.1 43.0 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 951 0.8 9.4 51.5 38.3 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 994 0.5 2.6 48.6 48.3 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 981 2.3 15.4 44.0 38.2 3.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 993 1.4 7.6 40.5 50.6 3.4 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 989 2.0 7.3 28.0 62.7 3.5 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 18.2 9.1 72.7 3.5 0.82 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 15 0.0 6.7 20.0 73.3 3.7 0.62 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 31. Developed abil to conduct research 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1619 Number of forms scanned = 1005 Number of forms with at least one student response = 999 Percent completed = 61.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics DEPARTMENT = Accounting SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 0.7 A 383 38.8 Sophomore 289 29.0 B 384 38.9 Junior 310 31.2 C 193 19.6 Senior 323 32.5 D 13 1.3 Graduate 45 4.5 E/Fail 4 0.4 Professional 2 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 19 1.9 Pass or Audit 10 1.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 173 17.4 Studies Program 10 1.0 2 hours 300 30.2 Required by my major 852 86.0 3 hours 278 28.0 Other (e.g. elective) 129 13.0 4 - 5 hours 164 16.5 6 - 7 hours 47 4.7 8 or more hours 30 3.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,057 0.3 1.8 50.6 47.3 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,003 2.9 11.7 51.2 34.2 3.2 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,033 1.5 6.3 50.0 42.1 3.3 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,038 2.1 7.8 51.0 39.1 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,053 1.9 4.7 49.4 44.1 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,003 1.5 4.7 50.6 43.2 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,043 0.3 2.1 44.0 53.6 3.5 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 929 5.1 23.3 45.0 26.7 2.9 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,053 4.1 14.2 43.9 37.9 3.2 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,055 0.4 1.5 38.8 59.3 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 980 0.8 2.6 51.0 45.6 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,050 2.2 6.2 47.7 43.9 3.3 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,047 8.1 20.0 42.3 29.6 2.9 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 1,049 4.4 13.3 39.3 43.1 3.2 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 831 2.2 15.4 59.8 22.6 3.0 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,032 1.7 8.8 57.8 31.6 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,026 2.2 10.3 55.9 31.5 3.2 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,048 2.3 5.7 56.4 35.6 3.3 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,029 9.4 28.7 41.8 20.1 2.7 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,048 4.9 14.7 46.1 34.4 3.1 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,045 5.6 14.3 34.2 46.0 3.2 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 11.1 11.1 66.7 11.1 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 1752 Number of forms scanned = 1094 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1058 Percent completed = 60.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 39 86.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 13.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 45 95.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 4.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 2.1 2 hours 5 10.9 Required by my major 21 44.7 3 hours 13 28.3 Other (e.g. elective) 25 53.2 4 - 5 hours 13 28.3 6 - 7 hours 10 21.7 8 or more hours 5 10.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 50 0.0 4.0 18.0 78.0 3.7 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 48 0.0 4.2 27.1 68.8 3.6 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 0.0 2.2 37.8 60.0 3.6 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 48 0.0 6.3 39.6 54.2 3.5 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 2.4 2.4 33.3 61.9 3.5 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 44 0.0 2.3 45.5 52.3 3.5 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 50 0.0 6.0 38.0 56.0 3.5 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 50 0.0 0.0 14.0 86.0 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 49 0.0 2.0 26.5 71.4 3.7 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 50 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 49 0.0 4.1 24.5 71.4 3.7 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 50 0.0 4.0 22.0 74.0 3.7 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 48 0.0 2.1 27.1 70.8 3.7 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 44 0.0 6.8 38.6 54.5 3.5 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 49 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 50 0.0 6.0 32.0 62.0 3.6 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 50 0.0 4.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 50 0.0 4.0 22.0 74.0 3.7 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 35 5.7 5.7 42.9 45.7 3.3 0.83 29. Students free to express opinions 40 0.0 2.5 22.5 75.0 3.7 0.51 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 40 0.0 2.5 32.5 65.0 3.6 0.54 31. Developed abil to conduct research 32 0.0 6.3 34.4 59.4 3.5 0.62 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 58 Number of forms scanned = 57 Number of forms with at least one student response = 50 Percent completed = 86.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 316 21.7 A 834 58.0 Sophomore 440 30.2 B 514 35.7 Junior 342 23.4 C 79 5.5 Senior 352 24.1 D 4 0.3 Graduate 6 0.4 E/Fail 2 0.1 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.1 Pass or Audit 6 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 463 31.9 Studies Program 723 50.5 2 hours 475 32.7 Required by my major 536 37.5 3 hours 302 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 172 12.0 4 - 5 hours 152 10.5 6 - 7 hours 32 2.2 8 or more hours 28 1.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,627 0.6 1.4 41.4 56.6 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,610 4.9 11.4 45.9 37.8 3.2 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,617 3.3 8.3 49.0 39.4 3.2 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,405 2.1 6.5 46.5 45.0 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,624 3.0 7.3 44.5 45.3 3.3 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,623 1.8 7.8 45.7 44.8 3.3 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,627 1.5 5.5 44.1 48.9 3.4 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,619 1.4 6.6 44.4 47.6 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,628 1.3 6.9 39.9 52.0 3.4 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,629 0.6 1.1 34.9 63.4 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 1,495 0.7 3.2 45.3 50.8 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,620 1.0 3.6 40.6 54.8 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,617 4.4 13.6 37.7 44.3 3.2 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 1,620 1.0 3.1 35.7 60.2 3.6 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,554 1.5 6.8 50.8 41.0 3.3 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,573 2.4 8.6 50.0 39.0 3.3 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,488 2.7 14.5 47.8 34.9 3.2 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,608 1.7 3.4 51.3 43.6 3.4 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,581 7.2 24.8 38.6 29.4 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,618 3.6 10.9 41.7 43.7 3.3 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,617 2.9 7.6 28.5 61.0 3.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 442 7.7 21.9 49.1 21.3 2.8 0.85 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 639 3.6 11.0 56.5 29.0 3.1 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 637 4.9 10.0 54.6 30.5 3.1 0.77 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 221 4.1 13.1 48.0 34.8 3.1 0.79 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 191 4.7 12.0 47.6 35.6 3.1 0.81 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 108 0.0 3.7 50.0 46.3 3.4 0.57 28. Guided student report preparation 107 0.9 3.7 43.9 51.4 3.5 0.62 29. Students free to express opinions 108 0.0 3.7 38.0 58.3 3.5 0.57 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 104 2.9 6.7 42.3 48.1 3.4 0.74 31. Developed abil to conduct research 97 5.2 10.3 43.3 41.2 3.2 0.83 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 54 1.9 5.6 53.7 38.9 3.3 0.66 33. Amount of work appropriate 55 7.3 5.5 40.0 47.3 3.3 0.87 34. Instructor explained expectations 55 1.8 3.6 52.7 41.8 3.3 0.64 35. Instructor helped with my problems 54 1.9 3.7 53.7 40.7 3.3 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 47 2.1 6.4 46.8 44.7 3.3 0.70 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 2091 Number of forms scanned = 1644 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1635 Percent completed = 78.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Library and Information Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.3 A 209 67.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 93 30.2 Junior 9 2.9 C 6 1.9 Senior 31 9.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 266 84.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 6 1.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 4.8 Studies Program 6 1.9 2 hours 65 20.9 Required by my major 165 53.1 3 hours 81 26.0 Other (e.g. elective) 140 45.0 4 - 5 hours 95 30.5 6 - 7 hours 33 10.6 8 or more hours 22 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 334 0.0 0.0 38.0 62.0 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 311 1.3 11.3 44.7 42.8 3.3 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 334 0.0 3.0 48.2 48.8 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 277 0.7 4.3 46.9 48.0 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 333 0.3 1.8 47.7 50.2 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 333 0.0 3.3 46.8 49.8 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 334 0.6 3.6 47.0 48.8 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 328 0.3 7.6 50.9 41.2 3.3 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 334 0.3 9.6 43.4 46.7 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 334 0.0 1.2 26.3 72.5 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 306 0.3 1.0 44.1 54.6 3.5 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 334 0.3 2.7 42.2 54.8 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 331 0.3 9.7 42.3 47.7 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 333 0.3 4.2 39.9 55.6 3.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 276 0.0 5.4 52.5 42.0 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 329 0.0 5.2 46.5 48.3 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 310 0.0 6.8 52.9 40.3 3.3 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 335 0.0 1.5 46.3 52.2 3.5 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 326 1.8 16.0 41.4 40.8 3.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 332 0.3 7.8 35.2 56.6 3.5 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 330 0.3 7.9 29.7 62.1 3.5 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 389 Number of forms scanned = 375 Number of forms with at least one student response = 336 Percent completed = 86.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Sch of Journalism & Telecomm SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 63 7.6 A 393 48.0 Sophomore 128 15.4 B 344 42.1 Junior 203 24.5 C 70 8.6 Senior 434 52.3 D 8 1.0 Graduate 1 0.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.1 Pass or Audit 3 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 191 23.2 Studies Program 12 1.5 2 hours 243 29.6 Required by my major 598 72.5 3 hours 204 24.8 Other (e.g. elective) 215 26.1 4 - 5 hours 119 14.5 6 - 7 hours 34 4.1 8 or more hours 31 3.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 927 0.2 2.3 49.6 47.9 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 794 3.4 10.3 49.5 36.8 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 921 1.0 5.5 50.6 42.9 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 853 0.8 8.6 48.1 42.6 3.3 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 918 1.9 8.3 48.4 41.5 3.3 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 918 1.1 3.6 53.3 42.0 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 915 3.5 4.8 49.5 42.2 3.3 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 901 1.6 9.4 46.4 42.6 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 926 3.6 9.2 43.4 43.8 3.3 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 927 0.6 1.3 33.8 64.3 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 881 0.9 1.8 45.5 51.8 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 920 1.3 5.4 44.9 48.4 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 923 5.3 12.1 39.4 43.1 3.2 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 921 2.5 7.7 42.7 47.1 3.3 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 820 2.2 7.8 53.0 37.0 3.2 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 874 1.9 7.4 49.4 41.2 3.3 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 846 2.0 11.3 48.3 38.3 3.2 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 916 1.9 4.3 47.9 46.0 3.4 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 901 5.5 16.1 41.3 37.1 3.1 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 924 2.6 11.9 38.9 46.6 3.3 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 921 4.2 10.7 30.8 54.2 3.3 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 32 0.0 12.5 59.4 28.1 3.2 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 35 0.0 11.4 62.9 25.7 3.1 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 35 0.0 2.9 62.9 34.3 3.3 0.53 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 26 0.0 11.5 50.0 38.5 3.3 0.67 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 28. Guided student report preparation 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 29. Students free to express opinions 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 31. Developed abil to conduct research 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 33. Amount of work appropriate 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 34. Instructor explained expectations 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 35. Instructor helped with my problems 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1301 Number of forms scanned = 940 Number of forms with at least one student response = 933 Percent completed = 71.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 75 82.4 Sophomore 9 9.7 B 14 15.4 Junior 17 18.3 C 1 1.1 Senior 15 16.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 52 55.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 33 36.7 Studies Program 6 6.6 2 hours 24 26.7 Required by my major 51 56.0 3 hours 18 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 34 37.4 4 - 5 hours 10 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 5 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 107 0.0 0.9 40.2 58.9 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 100 0.0 4.0 53.0 43.0 3.4 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 104 1.0 1.0 51.9 46.2 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 79 0.0 2.5 51.9 45.6 3.4 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 100 0.0 4.0 46.0 50.0 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 106 1.9 2.8 42.5 52.8 3.5 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 96 0.0 1.0 46.9 52.1 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 95 0.0 1.1 49.5 49.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 107 0.0 3.7 34.6 61.7 3.6 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 107 0.0 1.9 33.6 64.5 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 105 0.0 1.0 34.3 64.8 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 106 0.0 0.0 35.8 64.2 3.6 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 107 0.0 5.6 41.1 53.3 3.5 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 107 0.0 1.9 34.6 63.6 3.6 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 104 1.0 1.0 38.5 59.6 3.6 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 104 0.0 2.9 41.3 55.8 3.5 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 103 0.0 3.9 47.6 48.5 3.4 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 106 0.0 0.9 45.3 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 106 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 106 0.0 0.9 41.5 57.5 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 106 0.0 1.9 30.2 67.9 3.7 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 31. Developed abil to conduct research 11 9.1 0.0 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.93 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 169 Number of forms scanned = 110 Number of forms with at least one student response = 107 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Administration and Supervision SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 107 89.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 9.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 0.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 102 84.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 18 14.9 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.8 Pass or Audit 1 0.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 14.0 Studies Program 8 6.7 2 hours 27 22.3 Required by my major 99 83.2 3 hours 31 25.6 Other (e.g. elective) 12 10.1 4 - 5 hours 24 19.8 6 - 7 hours 17 14.0 8 or more hours 5 4.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 126 0.8 1.6 39.7 57.9 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 111 0.9 7.2 38.7 53.2 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 123 3.3 5.7 40.7 50.4 3.4 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 44 4.5 2.3 45.5 47.7 3.4 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 114 1.8 0.9 43.9 53.5 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 123 2.4 3.3 42.3 52.0 3.4 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 113 0.9 2.7 45.1 51.3 3.5 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 108 0.0 4.6 42.6 52.8 3.5 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 126 4.8 10.3 31.7 53.2 3.3 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 126 1.6 4.8 31.0 62.7 3.5 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 119 0.8 1.7 32.8 64.7 3.6 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 125 0.8 7.2 29.6 62.4 3.5 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 124 4.8 6.5 31.5 57.3 3.4 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 125 0.0 5.6 29.6 64.8 3.6 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 116 1.7 4.3 37.1 56.9 3.5 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 124 4.8 3.2 35.5 56.5 3.4 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 125 4.0 5.6 40.8 49.6 3.4 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 126 3.2 7.1 28.6 61.1 3.5 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 126 4.8 11.1 33.3 50.8 3.3 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 126 4.8 9.5 23.0 62.7 3.4 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 125 6.4 8.8 21.6 63.2 3.4 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 9 11.1 77.8 0.0 0.0 11.1 2.2 . 38. Question 38 9 11.1 77.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 39. Question 39 10 10.0 70.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 2.5 1.35 40. Question 40 10 10.0 10.0 60.0 0.0 20.0 3.1 1.20 41. Question 41 11 54.5 27.3 0.0 9.1 9.1 1.9 1.38 42. Question 42 11 9.1 36.4 36.4 9.1 9.1 2.7 1.10 43. Question 43 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 36.4 9.1 3.5 0.82 44. Question 44 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 3.8 . 45. Question 45 8 12.5 50.0 12.5 12.5 12.5 2.6 . 46. Question 46 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 3.6 . 47. Question 47 8 12.5 75.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 48. Question 48 8 37.5 37.5 12.5 12.5 0.0 2.0 . 49. Question 49 8 0.0 37.5 12.5 37.5 12.5 3.3 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 138 Number of forms scanned = 130 Number of forms with at least one student response = 126 Percent completed = 91.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Curriculum and Instruction SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 437 87.4 Sophomore 1 0.2 B 60 12.0 Junior 36 7.1 C 2 0.4 Senior 289 57.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 161 31.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 7 1.4 I 0 0.0 Other 11 2.2 Pass or Audit 1 0.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 76 15.1 Studies Program 17 3.4 2 hours 163 32.5 Required by my major 408 81.9 3 hours 138 27.5 Other (e.g. elective) 73 14.7 4 - 5 hours 85 16.9 6 - 7 hours 24 4.8 8 or more hours 16 3.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 516 0.0 3.7 28.9 67.4 3.6 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 505 3.8 6.1 29.7 60.4 3.5 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 518 1.4 7.7 27.6 63.3 3.5 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 376 0.3 2.7 25.8 71.3 3.7 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 511 2.7 5.9 27.0 64.4 3.5 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 515 0.8 3.5 32.8 62.9 3.6 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 503 1.2 6.6 28.6 63.6 3.5 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 502 1.4 6.8 27.1 64.7 3.6 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 518 2.1 9.1 25.7 63.1 3.5 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 518 0.8 2.5 20.8 75.9 3.7 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 481 1.0 2.7 27.7 68.6 3.6 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 518 1.0 7.1 26.1 65.8 3.6 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 513 2.1 7.4 25.9 64.5 3.5 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 514 1.0 1.6 22.6 74.9 3.7 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 492 0.8 3.9 35.4 60.0 3.5 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 507 1.2 6.3 31.2 61.3 3.5 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 504 1.4 7.5 32.1 58.9 3.5 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 511 1.2 5.3 29.4 64.2 3.6 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 508 2.4 10.2 27.6 59.8 3.4 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 514 3.3 9.3 23.0 64.4 3.5 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 510 3.1 10.2 19.0 67.6 3.5 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 15.4 0.0 30.8 53.8 3.2 1.09 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 7.1 14.3 21.4 57.1 3.3 0.99 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 8.3 8.3 16.7 66.7 3.4 1.00 28. Guided student report preparation 11 18.2 0.0 18.2 63.6 3.3 1.19 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 18.2 0.0 9.1 72.7 3.4 1.21 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 20.0 0.0 30.0 50.0 3.1 1.20 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 621 Number of forms scanned = 525 Number of forms with at least one student response = 520 Percent completed = 83.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Educational and Counseling Psych. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 1.2 A 405 69.3 Sophomore 121 20.5 B 148 25.3 Junior 92 15.6 C 17 2.9 Senior 47 8.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 313 53.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.3 I 6 1.0 Other 8 1.4 Pass or Audit 8 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 94 16.1 Studies Program 12 2.1 2 hours 163 27.9 Required by my major 442 76.1 3 hours 154 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 127 21.9 4 - 5 hours 112 19.1 6 - 7 hours 31 5.3 8 or more hours 31 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 626 0.3 3.4 35.9 60.4 3.6 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 601 3.8 7.8 47.8 40.6 3.3 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 612 0.5 2.9 41.8 54.7 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 427 1.6 8.2 39.3 50.8 3.4 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 599 0.5 2.2 41.9 55.4 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 623 0.8 3.7 45.6 49.9 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 603 2.0 6.6 37.0 54.4 3.4 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 595 1.3 5.9 40.8 51.9 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 623 1.3 6.4 36.9 55.4 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 624 0.2 0.8 29.0 70.0 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 580 0.3 1.9 40.2 57.6 3.6 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 624 0.8 2.9 36.2 60.1 3.6 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 622 1.6 9.6 39.7 49.0 3.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 623 1.0 2.4 29.7 66.9 3.6 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 576 0.5 1.9 46.9 50.7 3.5 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 613 0.8 4.1 44.4 50.7 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 596 1.3 5.9 47.0 45.8 3.4 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 619 0.6 2.3 39.1 58.0 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 606 3.6 14.9 39.9 41.6 3.2 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 622 0.6 7.2 36.0 56.1 3.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 621 1.8 8.4 27.7 62.2 3.5 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 29. Students free to express opinions 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 31. Developed abil to conduct research 18 5.6 5.6 50.0 38.9 3.2 0.81 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 739 Number of forms scanned = 630 Number of forms with at least one student response = 626 Percent completed = 84.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Educational Policy Studies & Eval SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 1.2 A 185 76.8 Sophomore 42 17.0 B 42 17.4 Junior 54 21.9 C 10 4.1 Senior 30 12.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 110 44.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 5 2.0 I 2 0.8 Other 3 1.2 Pass or Audit 2 0.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 30 12.3 Studies Program 3 1.2 2 hours 53 21.7 Required by my major 159 64.9 3 hours 65 26.6 Other (e.g. elective) 83 33.9 4 - 5 hours 60 24.6 6 - 7 hours 21 8.6 8 or more hours 15 6.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 264 0.8 3.4 35.2 60.6 3.6 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 259 4.2 10.8 38.6 46.3 3.3 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 260 0.8 6.9 37.3 55.0 3.5 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 187 1.6 3.2 38.5 56.7 3.5 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 260 1.5 6.9 30.0 61.5 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 261 1.1 4.6 34.9 59.4 3.5 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 263 0.4 0.8 32.7 66.2 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 261 1.5 6.1 31.4 60.9 3.5 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 264 1.5 8.0 31.1 59.5 3.5 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 264 0.8 2.7 19.7 76.9 3.7 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 246 0.0 1.6 29.7 68.7 3.7 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 263 0.0 4.2 25.9 70.0 3.7 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 264 1.9 9.5 29.5 59.1 3.5 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 262 0.0 3.4 20.6 76.0 3.7 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 249 0.4 1.6 42.2 55.8 3.5 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 262 0.8 5.0 38.5 55.7 3.5 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 245 1.2 10.2 36.7 51.8 3.4 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 264 1.1 3.4 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 262 3.4 14.1 36.6 45.8 3.2 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 263 2.7 11.4 27.8 58.2 3.4 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 262 3.4 8.4 18.3 69.8 3.5 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 6.7 0.0 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 30 0.0 6.7 30.0 63.3 3.6 0.63 28. Guided student report preparation 31 0.0 3.2 32.3 64.5 3.6 0.56 29. Students free to express opinions 34 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 34 0.0 0.0 20.6 79.4 3.8 0.41 31. Developed abil to conduct research 31 0.0 3.2 35.5 61.3 3.6 0.56 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 8 12.5 62.5 0.0 12.5 12.5 2.5 . 38. Question 38 8 12.5 50.0 12.5 12.5 12.5 2.6 . 39. Question 39 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 4.7 . 40. Question 40 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 25.0 12.5 3.1 . 41. Question 41 7 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 0.0 3.0 . 42. Question 42 7 14.3 14.3 0.0 42.9 28.6 3.6 . 43. Question 43 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 3.9 . 44. Question 44 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 14.3 14.3 3.1 . 45. Question 45 7 28.6 71.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 . 46. Question 46 7 14.3 28.6 14.3 42.9 0.0 2.9 . 47. Question 47 7 42.9 57.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 . 48. Question 48 7 42.9 28.6 14.3 14.3 0.0 2.0 . 49. Question 49 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 3.9 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 334 Number of forms scanned = 279 Number of forms with at least one student response = 264 Percent completed = 79.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Kinesiology and Health Promotion SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 123 12.3 A 717 71.9 Sophomore 143 14.3 B 210 21.1 Junior 226 22.6 C 32 3.2 Senior 409 40.9 D 2 0.2 Graduate 88 8.8 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 6 0.6 I 0 0.0 Other 5 0.5 Pass or Audit 35 3.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 628 63.0 Studies Program 10 1.0 2 hours 193 19.4 Required by my major 539 54.2 3 hours 116 11.6 Other (e.g. elective) 445 44.8 4 - 5 hours 40 4.0 6 - 7 hours 9 0.9 8 or more hours 11 1.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,088 0.4 2.0 44.0 53.6 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 822 4.9 9.7 46.1 39.3 3.2 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,006 2.2 4.6 51.7 41.6 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,046 1.8 3.5 45.5 49.1 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,076 1.3 3.0 45.4 50.4 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,049 1.0 3.7 47.0 48.3 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,067 0.9 5.3 45.0 48.7 3.4 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,020 1.5 8.2 47.5 42.7 3.3 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,085 1.0 3.6 43.9 51.5 3.5 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,090 0.3 1.7 36.9 61.2 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 1,005 0.4 3.2 45.5 50.9 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,085 0.8 2.8 41.3 55.1 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,081 1.9 6.6 41.3 50.3 3.4 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 1,085 0.7 1.8 37.7 59.8 3.6 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 919 1.4 6.3 51.3 41.0 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 951 1.3 6.5 48.9 43.3 3.3 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 917 1.7 8.1 48.4 41.8 3.3 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,049 0.7 2.2 47.9 49.3 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,006 3.1 12.3 42.6 41.9 3.2 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,073 1.3 6.4 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,071 1.4 5.9 29.9 62.8 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 56 0.0 5.4 46.4 48.2 3.4 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 59 0.0 3.4 49.2 47.5 3.4 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 55 0.0 3.6 49.1 47.3 3.4 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 52 3.8 5.8 44.2 46.2 3.3 0.76 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 46 2.2 4.3 39.1 54.3 3.5 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 46 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.50 28. Guided student report preparation 42 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.49 29. Students free to express opinions 45 0.0 2.2 37.8 60.0 3.6 0.54 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 43 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.49 31. Developed abil to conduct research 40 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 107 0.0 1.9 39.3 58.9 3.6 0.53 33. Amount of work appropriate 108 0.0 0.0 34.3 65.7 3.7 0.48 34. Instructor explained expectations 107 0.0 1.9 35.5 62.6 3.6 0.53 35. Instructor helped with my problems 104 0.0 4.8 29.8 65.4 3.6 0.58 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 105 0.0 3.8 36.2 60.0 3.6 0.57 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1460 Number of forms scanned = 1133 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1101 Percent completed = 75.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education DEPARTMENT = Special Educ and Rehab Counseling SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.3 A 218 73.4 Sophomore 39 12.9 B 72 24.2 Junior 67 22.2 C 6 2.0 Senior 88 29.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 99 32.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 3 1.0 I 1 0.3 Other 5 1.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 63 20.9 Studies Program 6 2.0 2 hours 73 24.3 Required by my major 271 90.0 3 hours 77 25.6 Other (e.g. elective) 24 8.0 4 - 5 hours 48 15.9 6 - 7 hours 20 6.6 8 or more hours 20 6.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 322 1.2 3.7 32.3 62.7 3.6 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 254 5.1 9.1 49.2 36.6 3.2 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 318 2.8 7.5 37.1 52.5 3.4 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 274 4.7 4.7 33.9 56.6 3.4 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 318 2.2 5.7 34.3 57.9 3.5 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 317 1.6 8.2 36.6 53.6 3.4 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 319 1.6 5.6 32.9 59.9 3.5 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 319 3.8 7.2 32.6 56.4 3.4 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 320 4.7 8.8 27.2 59.4 3.4 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 320 1.3 3.1 22.8 72.8 3.7 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 302 1.7 6.6 30.1 61.6 3.5 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 321 5.0 6.5 23.7 64.8 3.5 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 321 6.2 7.5 29.3 57.0 3.4 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 319 2.8 2.8 28.2 66.1 3.6 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 297 1.7 4.4 36.7 57.2 3.5 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 315 3.8 4.4 37.5 54.3 3.4 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 305 3.3 7.2 35.4 54.1 3.4 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 315 3.8 3.5 34.9 57.8 3.5 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 314 5.1 12.1 36.3 46.5 3.2 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 321 5.3 8.4 25.5 60.7 3.4 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 320 6.9 6.9 21.6 64.7 3.4 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 8.3 16.7 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.90 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 33.3 25.0 41.7 3.1 0.90 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 0.94 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 10.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 2.8 1.03 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 12.5 37.5 12.5 37.5 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 37.5 25.0 37.5 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 10 20.0 10.0 20.0 50.0 3.0 1.25 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 30.0 10.0 60.0 3.3 0.95 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 359 Number of forms scanned = 329 Number of forms with at least one student response = 322 Percent completed = 89.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Civil Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 33 4.2 A 367 46.7 Sophomore 30 3.8 B 327 41.6 Junior 152 19.1 C 85 10.8 Senior 492 62.0 D 4 0.5 Graduate 86 10.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 122 15.4 Studies Program 5 0.6 2 hours 174 22.0 Required by my major 645 81.4 3 hours 204 25.8 Other (e.g. elective) 142 17.9 4 - 5 hours 183 23.1 6 - 7 hours 72 9.1 8 or more hours 37 4.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 831 0.8 3.1 64.7 31.3 3.3 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 807 9.9 16.6 50.4 23.0 2.9 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 829 1.1 6.5 62.5 29.9 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 786 1.8 9.4 61.5 27.4 3.1 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 827 1.6 7.9 61.9 28.7 3.2 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 830 2.2 6.4 63.4 28.1 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 827 1.0 8.6 62.6 27.8 3.2 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 815 4.0 22.0 54.5 19.5 2.9 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 835 4.7 13.1 55.7 26.6 3.0 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 832 0.1 1.4 45.0 53.5 3.5 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 786 0.9 6.6 57.6 34.9 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 829 0.7 7.5 59.0 32.8 3.2 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 819 6.3 17.3 50.5 25.8 3.0 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 826 2.5 12.7 55.2 29.5 3.1 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 694 3.5 11.0 66.3 19.3 3.0 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 813 2.0 5.4 66.3 26.3 3.2 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 819 2.0 5.9 66.4 25.8 3.2 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 824 1.8 5.0 64.3 28.9 3.2 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 811 7.8 27.3 46.6 18.4 2.8 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 827 3.6 15.1 50.7 30.6 3.1 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 828 5.0 13.2 43.7 38.2 3.2 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 33.3 22.2 44.4 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 29. Students free to express opinions 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 31. Developed abil to conduct research 18 5.6 5.6 50.0 38.9 3.2 0.81 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 82 1.2 4.9 64.6 29.3 3.2 0.59 33. Amount of work appropriate 81 16.0 21.0 48.1 14.8 2.6 0.93 34. Instructor explained expectations 81 1.2 9.9 61.7 27.2 3.1 0.63 35. Instructor helped with my problems 79 0.0 12.7 59.5 27.8 3.2 0.62 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 81 3.7 7.4 67.9 21.0 3.1 0.66 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 954 Number of forms scanned = 849 Number of forms with at least one student response = 838 Percent completed = 87.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Chemical & Materials Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 1.7 A 103 43.6 Sophomore 13 5.5 B 94 39.8 Junior 62 26.3 C 36 15.3 Senior 123 52.1 D 2 0.8 Graduate 34 14.4 E/Fail 1 0.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 22 9.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 38 16.2 Required by my major 206 88.0 3 hours 58 24.8 Other (e.g. elective) 28 12.0 4 - 5 hours 64 27.4 6 - 7 hours 27 11.5 8 or more hours 25 10.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 245 0.8 1.2 60.0 38.0 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 221 5.0 17.6 50.2 27.1 3.0 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 243 0.4 4.9 59.7 35.0 3.3 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 236 0.4 5.5 58.5 35.6 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 242 1.7 7.0 54.1 37.2 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 245 1.6 6.5 57.1 34.7 3.2 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 239 0.4 7.5 52.7 39.3 3.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 234 4.3 16.7 50.4 28.6 3.0 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 246 0.8 11.8 53.3 34.1 3.2 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 246 0.4 0.4 36.2 63.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 238 0.8 5.9 40.3 52.9 3.5 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 245 0.4 5.3 51.8 42.4 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 246 5.7 13.0 49.2 32.1 3.1 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 244 1.6 10.2 53.3 34.8 3.2 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 184 2.7 10.3 65.8 21.2 3.1 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 241 0.4 2.9 62.2 34.4 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 244 0.4 4.5 58.6 36.5 3.3 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 246 1.6 3.3 58.9 36.2 3.3 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 238 7.6 20.6 51.3 20.6 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 246 2.8 11.8 51.2 34.1 3.2 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 246 2.4 8.5 46.7 42.3 3.3 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 186 0.0 6.5 24.2 44.6 24.7 3.9 0.86 38. Question 38 189 0.0 3.2 20.1 48.1 28.6 4.0 0.79 39. Question 39 186 0.0 6.5 25.8 41.9 25.8 3.9 0.87 40. Question 40 159 0.0 3.8 17.6 47.2 31.4 4.1 0.80 41. Question 41 140 0.0 3.6 20.7 54.3 21.4 3.9 0.75 42. Question 42 118 0.0 6.8 32.2 42.4 18.6 3.7 0.84 43. Question 43 84 0.0 6.0 25.0 53.6 15.5 3.8 0.78 44. Question 44 52 0.0 1.9 21.2 50.0 26.9 4.0 0.75 45. Question 45 47 0.0 4.3 21.3 40.4 34.0 4.0 0.86 46. Question 46 27 0.0 3.7 3.7 66.7 25.9 4.1 0.66 47. Question 47 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.5 . 48. Question 48 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.5 . 49. Question 49 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.5 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 290 Number of forms scanned = 247 Number of forms with at least one student response = 246 Percent completed = 84.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Computer Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 184 16.2 A 634 56.0 Sophomore 291 25.5 B 370 32.7 Junior 189 16.6 C 98 8.7 Senior 222 19.5 D 13 1.1 Graduate 223 19.6 E/Fail 2 0.2 Professional 4 0.4 I 0 0.0 Other 26 2.3 Pass or Audit 15 1.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 161 14.1 Studies Program 89 7.8 2 hours 245 21.5 Required by my major 799 70.5 3 hours 263 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 246 21.7 4 - 5 hours 217 19.1 6 - 7 hours 106 9.3 8 or more hours 146 12.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,291 1.5 6.7 58.3 33.5 3.2 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,275 5.0 12.8 52.5 29.6 3.1 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,294 2.9 7.4 55.0 34.7 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,268 2.8 9.4 55.1 32.7 3.2 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,297 2.5 6.7 56.9 33.8 3.2 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,291 3.0 8.1 55.5 33.4 3.2 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,295 4.6 9.9 51.4 34.1 3.1 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,254 5.0 19.9 48.5 26.6 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,294 4.4 15.8 50.0 29.8 3.1 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,298 1.0 3.2 49.7 46.1 3.4 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 1,184 1.9 4.9 56.2 37.1 3.3 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,289 1.7 7.9 55.4 35.0 3.2 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,274 7.8 20.3 45.1 26.8 2.9 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 1,274 4.6 16.1 49.4 30.0 3.0 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,016 4.0 15.9 55.5 24.5 3.0 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,245 2.5 9.0 60.3 28.2 3.1 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,248 2.7 8.8 59.8 28.7 3.1 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,282 2.3 6.2 59.9 31.7 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,260 7.6 23.6 43.8 25.0 2.9 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,290 5.5 16.1 48.1 30.2 3.0 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,282 5.7 16.5 44.2 33.5 3.1 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 132 4.5 3.8 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.75 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 131 6.1 4.6 49.6 39.7 3.2 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 116 5.2 1.7 50.9 42.2 3.3 0.75 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 101 5.0 5.9 51.5 37.6 3.2 0.77 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 100 6.0 2.0 53.0 39.0 3.3 0.77 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 72 1.4 5.6 52.8 40.3 3.3 0.65 28. Guided student report preparation 69 1.4 4.3 53.6 40.6 3.3 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 71 1.4 1.4 56.3 40.8 3.4 0.59 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 71 2.8 2.8 52.1 42.3 3.3 0.67 31. Developed abil to conduct research 69 2.9 4.3 55.1 37.7 3.3 0.68 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 181 4.4 8.3 55.8 31.5 3.1 0.75 33. Amount of work appropriate 179 8.9 13.4 48.6 29.1 3.0 0.89 34. Instructor explained expectations 182 2.7 11.5 55.5 30.2 3.1 0.72 35. Instructor helped with my problems 175 4.0 8.0 52.6 35.4 3.2 0.75 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 160 3.1 10.0 54.4 32.5 3.2 0.73 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 2462 Number of forms scanned = 1339 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1314 Percent completed = 53.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Electrical Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.2 A 299 49.7 Sophomore 71 11.8 B 232 38.5 Junior 122 20.2 C 61 10.1 Senior 318 52.6 D 8 1.3 Graduate 88 14.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.3 Pass or Audit 2 0.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 45 7.4 Studies Program 14 2.3 2 hours 104 17.2 Required by my major 491 81.6 3 hours 177 29.3 Other (e.g. elective) 97 16.1 4 - 5 hours 146 24.1 6 - 7 hours 74 12.2 8 or more hours 59 9.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 636 0.9 2.8 52.5 43.7 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 582 6.5 11.3 52.2 29.9 3.1 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 627 2.2 6.7 49.9 41.1 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 579 4.1 6.6 45.4 43.9 3.3 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 629 2.4 8.1 46.1 43.4 3.3 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 625 2.4 6.6 51.5 39.5 3.3 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 626 3.0 10.4 44.2 42.3 3.3 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 609 6.4 18.9 48.3 26.4 2.9 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 637 4.4 10.7 43.8 41.1 3.2 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 636 1.4 4.1 34.9 59.6 3.5 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 596 1.7 4.5 42.6 51.2 3.4 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 635 1.7 7.6 43.8 46.9 3.4 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 633 5.5 14.5 43.9 36.0 3.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 620 2.4 13.1 49.2 35.3 3.2 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 467 3.0 10.7 55.9 30.4 3.1 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 627 2.1 6.9 54.4 36.7 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 629 1.9 6.5 54.7 36.9 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 632 2.1 5.7 54.4 37.8 3.3 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 618 5.8 20.7 44.7 28.8 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 630 4.3 13.2 42.5 40.0 3.2 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 625 5.9 12.0 34.9 47.2 3.2 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 10.5 5.3 31.6 52.6 3.3 0.99 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 77 0.0 6.5 54.5 39.0 3.3 0.59 33. Amount of work appropriate 75 10.7 5.3 49.3 34.7 3.1 0.91 34. Instructor explained expectations 74 2.7 6.8 50.0 40.5 3.3 0.71 35. Instructor helped with my problems 75 1.3 8.0 48.0 42.7 3.3 0.68 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 75 4.0 10.7 46.7 38.7 3.2 0.79 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 311 1.6 1.6 24.1 36.0 36.7 4.0 0.90 38. Question 38 313 2.2 2.9 26.5 38.7 29.7 3.9 0.93 39. Question 39 311 1.9 4.2 27.3 39.5 27.0 3.9 0.93 40. Question 40 296 4.7 9.8 28.4 34.5 22.6 3.6 1.08 41. Question 41 273 2.6 7.7 27.5 35.9 26.4 3.8 1.01 42. Question 42 209 2.4 7.2 34.0 33.5 23.0 3.7 0.99 43. Question 43 145 3.4 4.8 31.7 42.1 17.9 3.7 0.94 44. Question 44 147 3.4 4.8 33.3 39.5 19.0 3.7 0.95 45. Question 45 101 2.0 5.9 34.7 40.6 16.8 3.6 0.90 46. Question 46 50 0.0 6.0 24.0 52.0 18.0 3.8 0.80 47. Question 47 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 4.0 0.65 48. Question 48 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 33.3 46.7 4.2 0.94 49. Question 49 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 876 Number of forms scanned = 656 Number of forms with at least one student response = 649 Percent completed = 74.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. - Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 95.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 5.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.0 Studies Program 2 10.0 2 hours 3 15.0 Required by my major 8 40.0 3 hours 6 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 50.0 4 - 5 hours 7 35.0 6 - 7 hours 3 15.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 22 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Mechanical Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 48 5.4 A 473 53.9 Sophomore 67 7.5 B 299 34.1 Junior 232 26.1 C 95 10.8 Senior 455 51.2 D 9 1.0 Graduate 84 9.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.2 Pass or Audit 1 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 104 11.8 Studies Program 13 1.5 2 hours 130 14.7 Required by my major 763 86.0 3 hours 205 23.2 Other (e.g. elective) 111 12.5 4 - 5 hours 255 28.8 6 - 7 hours 107 12.1 8 or more hours 84 9.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 975 0.8 3.2 66.5 29.5 3.2 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 904 8.3 18.0 49.4 24.2 2.9 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 949 1.4 6.6 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 885 1.4 6.8 59.9 32.0 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 952 2.2 8.2 57.0 32.6 3.2 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 947 2.4 7.1 58.5 32.0 3.2 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 928 4.4 13.9 53.0 28.7 3.1 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 909 6.1 24.6 49.3 20.0 2.8 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 973 5.1 11.5 53.8 29.6 3.1 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 973 0.7 2.0 44.6 52.7 3.5 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 913 1.4 6.1 56.0 36.5 3.3 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 962 2.2 6.0 57.6 34.2 3.2 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 963 5.2 16.9 54.0 23.9 3.0 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 954 2.1 14.6 58.0 25.4 3.1 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 695 3.2 13.2 64.9 18.7 3.0 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 946 1.5 6.9 63.7 27.9 3.2 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 948 2.0 6.9 62.9 28.3 3.2 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 956 1.9 4.9 63.9 29.3 3.2 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 942 7.0 25.2 50.8 17.0 2.8 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 960 3.9 12.9 52.6 30.6 3.1 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 958 5.8 12.6 39.9 41.6 3.2 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 6.3 12.5 31.3 50.0 3.3 0.93 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 8.3 8.3 25.0 58.3 3.3 0.98 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 40.0 10.0 50.0 3.1 0.99 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 10.0 10.0 30.0 50.0 3.2 1.03 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 9 0.0 55.6 0.0 44.4 2.9 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 622 1.1 4.8 21.2 52.7 20.1 3.9 0.83 38. Question 38 621 1.4 5.0 21.3 51.4 20.9 3.9 0.86 39. Question 39 621 1.8 5.6 22.5 45.9 24.2 3.9 0.91 40. Question 40 590 1.5 6.6 22.0 47.3 22.5 3.8 0.90 41. Question 41 570 1.9 6.8 24.2 47.5 19.5 3.8 0.91 42. Question 42 435 0.9 5.3 23.0 49.0 21.8 3.9 0.85 43. Question 43 378 2.1 5.0 22.5 50.8 19.6 3.8 0.88 44. Question 44 304 1.3 4.9 21.4 52.0 20.4 3.9 0.84 45. Question 45 208 2.4 3.8 18.3 53.4 22.1 3.9 0.87 46. Question 46 143 2.8 6.3 20.3 51.0 19.6 3.8 0.93 47. Question 47 87 2.3 2.3 23.0 44.8 27.6 3.9 0.90 48. Question 48 46 0.0 4.3 17.4 50.0 28.3 4.0 0.80 49. Question 49 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 3.8 0.83 Number of forms preslugged = at least 1393 Number of forms scanned = 989 Number of forms with at least one student response = 981 Percent completed = 70.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering DEPARTMENT = Mining Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 36 58.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 21 33.9 Junior 18 28.6 C 5 8.1 Senior 37 58.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 12.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 19.0 Studies Program 1 1.6 2 hours 10 15.9 Required by my major 59 93.7 3 hours 23 36.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 4.8 4 - 5 hours 11 17.5 6 - 7 hours 4 6.3 8 or more hours 3 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 67 0.0 7.5 70.1 22.4 3.1 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 7.7 10.3 61.5 20.5 2.9 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 67 3.0 9.0 61.2 26.9 3.1 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 60 11.7 18.3 41.7 28.3 2.9 0.96 5. Grading was fair and consistent 66 6.1 10.6 53.0 30.3 3.1 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 67 0.0 1.5 67.2 31.3 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 67 0.0 0.0 68.7 31.3 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 67 4.5 11.9 62.7 20.9 3.0 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 67 3.0 17.9 55.2 23.9 3.0 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 67 0.0 3.0 56.7 40.3 3.4 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 64 1.6 9.4 56.3 32.8 3.2 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 0.0 7.5 64.2 28.4 3.2 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 66 9.1 27.3 51.5 12.1 2.7 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 66 1.5 6.1 68.2 24.2 3.2 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 51 5.9 13.7 62.7 17.6 2.9 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 66 0.0 6.1 68.2 25.8 3.2 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 65 0.0 10.8 61.5 27.7 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 66 0.0 13.6 60.6 25.8 3.1 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 65 9.2 43.1 35.4 12.3 2.5 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 67 7.5 22.4 44.8 25.4 2.9 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 67 3.0 22.4 47.8 26.9 3.0 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 29 6.9 6.9 65.5 20.7 3.0 0.76 33. Amount of work appropriate 29 6.9 13.8 62.1 17.2 2.9 0.77 34. Instructor explained expectations 29 3.4 20.7 65.5 10.3 2.8 0.66 35. Instructor helped with my problems 28 3.6 21.4 60.7 14.3 2.9 0.71 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 29 6.9 20.7 55.2 17.2 2.8 0.80 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 4.4 . 38. Question 38 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 4.3 . 39. Question 39 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 4.4 . 40. Question 40 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 4.3 . 41. Question 41 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 4.1 . 42. Question 42 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 4.1 . 43. Question 43 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 4.4 . 44. Question 44 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 4.2 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 70 Number of forms scanned = 67 Number of forms with at least one student response = 67 Percent completed = 95.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 45.5 Required by my major 11 100.0 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 111 16.7 A 378 56.9 Sophomore 88 13.2 B 237 35.7 Junior 145 21.8 C 37 5.6 Senior 221 33.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 96 14.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 4 0.6 Pass or Audit 12 1.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 219 33.0 Studies Program 124 18.7 2 hours 218 32.9 Required by my major 353 53.2 3 hours 121 18.3 Other (e.g. elective) 186 28.1 4 - 5 hours 56 8.4 6 - 7 hours 12 1.8 8 or more hours 37 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 724 0.1 0.8 47.5 51.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 659 2.6 9.0 51.1 37.3 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 704 0.9 6.5 52.8 39.8 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 626 1.4 5.4 48.7 44.4 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 692 1.0 4.8 48.7 45.5 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 698 0.4 5.4 52.7 41.4 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 682 0.9 5.3 56.2 37.7 3.3 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 654 2.3 10.4 52.9 34.4 3.2 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 718 1.9 6.5 43.2 48.3 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 721 0.6 1.1 33.1 65.2 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 649 0.9 2.5 47.0 49.6 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 719 1.3 2.6 44.6 51.5 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 715 2.4 10.6 39.2 47.8 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 721 0.6 3.6 43.1 52.7 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 683 0.4 4.4 53.9 41.3 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 693 1.0 5.9 52.8 40.3 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 673 1.2 7.3 54.4 37.1 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 711 0.8 3.0 48.9 47.3 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 697 2.9 13.5 45.1 38.6 3.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 722 1.2 8.9 38.0 51.9 3.4 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 720 2.1 7.4 32.4 58.2 3.5 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 33 0.0 18.2 51.5 30.3 3.1 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 44 2.3 9.1 56.8 31.8 3.2 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 42 0.0 7.1 54.8 38.1 3.3 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1089 Number of forms scanned = 742 Number of forms with at least one student response = 727 Percent completed = 66.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Human Env Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 20 12.6 A 142 89.9 Sophomore 35 22.0 B 10 6.3 Junior 39 24.5 C 1 0.6 Senior 61 38.4 D 1 0.6 Graduate 4 2.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 4 2.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 119 76.3 Studies Program 9 5.7 2 hours 27 17.3 Required by my major 136 86.1 3 hours 7 4.5 Other (e.g. elective) 13 8.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 1.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 170 1.2 2.4 49.4 47.1 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 72 4.2 4.2 48.6 43.1 3.3 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 167 6.0 11.4 49.1 33.5 3.1 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 68 2.9 4.4 50.0 42.6 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 164 0.6 0.6 47.6 51.2 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 169 2.4 3.0 45.6 49.1 3.4 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 163 1.8 6.1 47.2 44.8 3.3 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 159 4.4 14.5 46.5 34.6 3.1 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 170 3.5 11.2 47.6 37.6 3.2 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 171 1.8 2.9 45.6 49.7 3.4 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 149 1.3 6.0 55.0 37.6 3.3 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 167 0.6 1.8 51.5 46.1 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 169 10.7 13.0 42.6 33.7 3.0 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 171 1.8 7.0 46.2 45.0 3.3 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 161 2.5 11.2 54.0 32.3 3.2 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 163 6.1 14.1 50.9 28.8 3.0 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 161 6.2 14.9 46.6 32.3 3.0 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 165 3.6 7.9 51.5 37.0 3.2 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 163 12.3 19.6 42.3 25.8 2.8 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 171 14.6 20.5 40.9 24.0 2.7 0.98 21. Overall quality of teaching 170 3.5 12.4 40.0 44.1 3.2 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 215 Number of forms scanned = 171 Number of forms with at least one student response = 171 Percent completed = 79.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 65 11.5 A 332 59.4 Sophomore 153 27.1 B 191 34.2 Junior 172 30.5 C 29 5.2 Senior 168 29.8 D 1 0.2 Graduate 5 0.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.2 Pass or Audit 6 1.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 154 27.4 Studies Program 77 13.7 2 hours 150 26.6 Required by my major 407 72.5 3 hours 107 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 77 13.7 4 - 5 hours 76 13.5 6 - 7 hours 23 4.1 8 or more hours 53 9.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 612 1.5 4.2 50.3 44.0 3.4 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 564 6.2 11.2 47.0 35.6 3.1 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 595 2.4 8.1 54.1 35.5 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 531 1.5 6.2 49.5 42.7 3.3 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 591 3.6 10.5 44.5 41.5 3.2 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 602 2.5 5.3 53.5 38.7 3.3 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 593 5.7 12.1 42.0 40.1 3.2 0.85 8. Graded assignments included comments 560 6.6 20.2 45.7 27.5 2.9 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 612 3.8 11.3 46.1 38.9 3.2 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 612 1.3 4.6 37.1 57.0 3.5 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 553 1.8 6.1 49.0 43.0 3.3 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 608 2.6 8.4 44.6 44.4 3.3 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 607 4.9 15.7 43.7 35.7 3.1 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 594 2.9 10.9 43.3 42.9 3.3 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 518 1.4 7.7 54.8 36.1 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 579 1.7 8.3 58.5 31.4 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 524 1.9 15.1 52.9 30.2 3.1 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 604 1.2 4.5 55.1 39.2 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 590 5.1 24.1 43.4 27.5 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 604 3.1 17.1 41.9 37.9 3.1 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 599 7.0 14.7 34.4 43.9 3.2 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 40 5.0 22.5 57.5 15.0 2.8 0.75 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 58 5.2 10.3 63.8 20.7 3.0 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 51 0.0 11.8 62.7 25.5 3.1 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 43 0.0 4.7 51.2 44.2 3.4 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 31 0.0 6.5 61.3 32.3 3.3 0.58 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 9.1 0.0 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.77 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 786 Number of forms scanned = 642 Number of forms with at least one student response = 621 Percent completed = 79.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 1.9 A 214 69.9 Sophomore 44 14.1 B 71 23.2 Junior 91 29.2 C 13 4.2 Senior 142 45.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 29 9.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 8 2.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 117 37.5 Studies Program 14 4.5 2 hours 80 25.6 Required by my major 256 82.1 3 hours 58 18.6 Other (e.g. elective) 42 13.5 4 - 5 hours 28 9.0 6 - 7 hours 6 1.9 8 or more hours 23 7.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 353 2.5 2.0 43.3 52.1 3.5 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 303 3.0 9.9 45.5 41.6 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 328 1.2 5.5 46.6 46.6 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 320 1.9 6.3 44.7 47.2 3.4 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 335 2.4 5.1 39.4 53.1 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 332 1.8 3.9 44.3 50.0 3.4 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 325 2.2 16.3 40.6 40.9 3.2 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 318 2.5 11.0 45.6 40.9 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 347 1.7 6.9 38.9 52.4 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 351 0.3 0.9 31.9 67.0 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 341 1.5 3.2 37.5 57.8 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 350 2.0 2.9 38.6 56.6 3.5 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 347 1.7 7.5 42.9 47.8 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 346 1.2 4.0 39.6 55.2 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 295 1.4 6.4 51.2 41.0 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 333 0.9 5.4 52.6 41.1 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 323 1.2 9.0 48.6 41.2 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 349 0.3 1.7 49.6 48.4 3.5 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 340 3.2 13.5 42.9 40.3 3.2 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 344 3.5 6.7 45.6 44.2 3.3 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 343 4.1 7.0 30.3 58.6 3.4 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 28. Guided student report preparation 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 29. Students free to express opinions 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 31. Developed abil to conduct research 14 0.0 7.1 7.1 85.7 3.8 0.58 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 33 0.0 6.1 54.5 39.4 3.3 0.60 33. Amount of work appropriate 32 0.0 9.4 50.0 40.6 3.3 0.64 34. Instructor explained expectations 33 0.0 6.1 57.6 36.4 3.3 0.59 35. Instructor helped with my problems 33 3.0 18.2 42.4 36.4 3.1 0.82 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 30 0.0 16.7 53.3 30.0 3.1 0.68 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 549 Number of forms scanned = 362 Number of forms with at least one student response = 357 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Law DEPARTMENT = Law SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 60.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 40.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 4 80.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 60.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 11 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 45.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Diplomacy & International Commerc SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 52.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 47.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 90.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 5.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 38.1 3 hours 3 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 13 61.9 4 - 5 hours 8 38.1 6 - 7 hours 6 28.6 8 or more hours 4 19.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 8.0 24.0 68.0 3.6 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 3.4 24.1 72.4 3.7 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 3.4 37.9 58.6 3.6 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 3.7 14.8 81.5 3.8 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 7.4 11.1 81.5 3.7 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 7.4 92.6 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 3.7 18.5 77.8 3.7 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 3.7 33.3 63.0 3.6 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 3.6 39.3 57.1 3.5 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 3.4 17.2 79.3 3.8 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 3.4 10.3 82.8 3.7 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 46 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School DEPARTMENT = Public Administration SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.7 A 95 65.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 49 33.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 142 95.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 5 3.4 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.7 Pass or Audit 2 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 7.5 Studies Program 8 5.6 2 hours 32 21.8 Required by my major 111 77.1 3 hours 41 27.9 Other (e.g. elective) 25 17.4 4 - 5 hours 46 31.3 6 - 7 hours 12 8.2 8 or more hours 5 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 162 0.0 3.1 42.0 54.9 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 145 2.8 9.0 51.0 37.2 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 159 1.3 5.7 53.5 39.6 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 128 1.6 5.5 44.5 48.4 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 156 0.6 6.4 48.1 44.9 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 161 1.9 6.2 46.6 45.3 3.4 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 160 0.0 6.3 43.1 50.6 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 159 1.3 7.5 50.9 40.3 3.3 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 159 2.5 8.8 52.8 35.8 3.2 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 161 0.6 3.1 29.2 67.1 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 151 2.0 4.0 49.0 45.0 3.4 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 160 0.6 5.6 48.1 45.6 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 160 1.9 13.1 44.4 40.6 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 158 1.9 3.8 47.5 46.8 3.4 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 142 0.7 4.2 59.2 35.9 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 160 0.6 8.1 39.4 51.9 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 158 0.6 7.6 45.6 46.2 3.4 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 160 0.6 4.4 45.0 50.0 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 157 4.5 15.3 47.8 32.5 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 161 4.3 8.1 41.0 46.6 3.3 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 161 4.3 9.3 32.9 53.4 3.4 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 28. Guided student report preparation 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 29. Students free to express opinions 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 31. Developed abil to conduct research 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 185 Number of forms scanned = 168 Number of forms with at least one student response = 162 Percent completed = 87.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Military Science DEPARTMENT = ROTC SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 25.0 A 49 81.7 Sophomore 16 26.7 B 7 11.7 Junior 19 31.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.7 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 5.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 35.0 Studies Program 2 3.3 2 hours 15 25.0 Required by my major 2 3.3 3 hours 15 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 56 93.3 4 - 5 hours 3 5.0 6 - 7 hours 1 1.7 8 or more hours 5 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 65 1.5 1.5 27.7 69.2 3.6 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 0.0 2.3 36.4 61.4 3.6 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 57 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 63 0.0 1.6 30.2 68.3 3.7 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 66 0.0 1.5 27.3 71.2 3.7 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 60 0.0 1.7 28.3 70.0 3.7 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 61 1.6 0.0 27.9 70.5 3.7 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 60 1.7 0.0 31.7 66.7 3.6 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 67 1.5 1.5 26.9 70.1 3.7 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 67 1.5 0.0 22.4 76.1 3.7 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 65 0.0 0.0 24.6 75.4 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 1.5 1.5 25.4 71.6 3.7 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 67 3.0 3.0 23.9 70.1 3.6 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 67 0.0 1.5 23.9 74.6 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 63 1.6 0.0 31.7 66.7 3.6 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 67 0.0 1.5 29.9 68.7 3.7 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 67 0.0 3.0 29.9 67.2 3.6 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 67 0.0 1.5 28.4 70.1 3.7 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 65 0.0 3.1 32.3 64.6 3.6 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 65 0.0 4.6 27.7 67.7 3.6 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 65 3.1 1.5 18.5 76.9 3.7 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 0.0 88.9 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 33. Amount of work appropriate 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 34. Instructor explained expectations 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 35. Instructor helped with my problems 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 99 Number of forms scanned = 67 Number of forms with at least one student response = 67 Percent completed = 67.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 2.4 A 669 74.3 Sophomore 30 3.3 B 205 22.8 Junior 132 14.4 C 21 2.3 Senior 184 20.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 532 58.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.1 I 3 0.3 Other 13 1.4 Pass or Audit 2 0.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 162 17.9 Studies Program 44 4.9 2 hours 199 22.0 Required by my major 682 75.8 3 hours 166 18.4 Other (e.g. elective) 174 19.3 4 - 5 hours 132 14.6 6 - 7 hours 44 4.9 8 or more hours 200 22.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 952 0.9 3.3 36.0 59.8 3.5 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 671 2.2 8.2 41.7 47.8 3.4 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 924 1.2 3.4 45.6 49.9 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 628 1.9 4.6 40.3 53.2 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 918 2.2 4.8 39.4 53.6 3.4 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 931 1.1 4.1 41.0 53.8 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 928 1.1 2.6 40.6 55.7 3.5 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 929 1.4 4.8 39.3 54.5 3.5 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 953 2.5 6.9 36.1 54.5 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 955 0.7 1.4 28.3 69.6 3.7 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 899 0.7 2.1 38.3 59.0 3.6 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 954 0.9 3.8 32.2 63.1 3.6 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 951 2.5 6.3 34.0 57.2 3.5 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 957 0.7 1.9 29.6 67.8 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 914 0.8 2.1 42.6 54.6 3.5 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 942 1.0 4.1 40.8 54.1 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 930 1.2 5.7 43.3 49.8 3.4 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 952 1.2 3.2 38.3 57.4 3.5 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 937 2.3 9.1 39.6 49.0 3.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 954 2.4 7.1 30.2 60.3 3.5 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 953 3.5 7.1 22.5 66.9 3.5 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 55 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 63 0.0 0.0 34.9 65.1 3.7 0.48 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 62 1.6 0.0 32.3 66.1 3.6 0.58 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 49 0.0 4.1 28.6 67.3 3.6 0.57 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 50 2.0 2.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.64 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 90 3.3 10.0 32.2 54.4 3.4 0.80 28. Guided student report preparation 92 4.3 8.7 25.0 62.0 3.4 0.83 29. Students free to express opinions 100 1.0 1.0 23.0 75.0 3.7 0.53 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 98 4.1 6.1 27.6 62.2 3.5 0.79 31. Developed abil to conduct research 85 3.5 12.9 37.6 45.9 3.3 0.82 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 33. Amount of work appropriate 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 34. Instructor explained expectations 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 35. Instructor helped with my problems 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1124 Number of forms scanned = 961 Number of forms with at least one student response = 960 Percent completed = 85.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************