****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Education FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HEE 686 001L1 EVALUATION IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Alexander, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 45.5 Required by my major 11 100.0 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 776 001S1 PROSEM MFT: GENDER & CULTURAL ISSUES IN MFT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botkin, Darla R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 3 42.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 16.7 50.0 16.7 16.7 2.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 787 001L1 SUPERVISED EXP PRACTICE OF MARRIAGE/FAM THERAPY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botkin, Darla R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 5 71.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 686 001L1 THEORY/METHS IN MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brock, Gregory W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 776 002S1 PROSEM MFT: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brock, Gregory W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 42.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 255 001L1 CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Devine, Carol ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 3.1 A 28 84.8 Sophomore 9 28.1 B 5 15.2 Junior 17 53.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 15.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 33.3 Studies Program 1 3.1 2 hours 17 51.5 Required by my major 20 62.5 3 hours 4 12.1 Other (e.g. elective) 11 34.4 4 - 5 hours 1 3.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 2.8 63.9 33.3 3.3 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 2.9 54.3 42.9 3.4 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 2.8 63.9 33.3 3.3 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 2.8 66.7 30.6 3.3 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 5.7 65.7 28.6 3.2 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 2.8 25.0 47.2 25.0 2.9 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 6.3 65.6 28.1 3.2 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 2.9 11.4 54.3 31.4 3.1 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 14.3 54.3 31.4 3.2 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 13.9 52.8 33.3 3.2 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 8.8 70.6 20.6 3.1 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 8.8 67.6 23.5 3.1 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 9.7 74.2 16.1 3.1 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 69.4 30.6 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 0.0 13.9 58.3 27.8 3.1 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 2.8 22.2 38.9 36.1 3.1 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 251 201L1 PERSONAL/FAMILY FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.8 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 2 9.5 B 6 28.6 Junior 9 42.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 38.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.8 Pass or Audit 3 14.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 61.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 19.0 Required by my major 6 28.6 3 hours 3 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 15 71.4 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 4.3 13.0 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 13.0 13.0 56.5 17.4 2.8 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 13.0 34.8 52.2 3.4 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 13.0 65.2 21.7 3.1 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 30.4 52.2 13.0 2.7 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 87.0 13.0 3.1 0.34 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 21.1 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 27.3 45.5 22.7 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 17.4 47.8 34.8 3.2 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 13.0 56.5 26.1 3.0 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 71.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 399 201L1 PRAC IN FAM STUDIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 2 50.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 25.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 75.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 4 100.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 486 201O1 FIELD EXPER IN FAMILY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 25.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 75.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 499 201O1 INTERNSHIP IN FAMILY LIFE EDUCATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 93.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 6.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 11 73.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 26.7 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 12 80.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 15 6.7 0.0 66.7 26.7 3.1 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 251 001L1 PERSONAL/FAMILY FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 15.6 A 8 18.2 Sophomore 15 33.3 B 22 50.0 Junior 11 24.4 C 14 31.8 Senior 12 26.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 28.9 Studies Program 1 2.3 2 hours 19 42.2 Required by my major 15 34.1 3 hours 8 17.8 Other (e.g. elective) 28 63.6 4 - 5 hours 3 6.7 6 - 7 hours 2 4.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 48 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 48 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 47 0.0 4.3 55.3 40.4 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 48 0.0 8.3 56.3 35.4 3.3 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 2.1 10.4 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 47 0.0 2.1 57.4 40.4 3.4 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 47 0.0 8.5 61.7 29.8 3.2 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 46 0.0 15.2 54.3 30.4 3.2 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 48 0.0 4.2 39.6 56.3 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 48 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 45 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 48 0.0 0.0 39.6 60.4 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 0.0 12.5 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 48 0.0 0.0 52.1 47.9 3.5 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 0.0 2.2 62.2 35.6 3.3 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 45 0.0 2.2 62.2 35.6 3.3 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 2.2 0.0 58.7 39.1 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 4.3 10.9 45.7 39.1 3.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 47 0.0 2.1 53.2 44.7 3.4 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 47 0.0 2.1 31.9 66.0 3.6 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 149 Number of forms scanned = 50 Number of forms with at least one student response = 48 Percent completed = 32.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 304 201L1 PERSONAL AND FAMILY RISK MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 10.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 10.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 4 40.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 40.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 3 30.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 70.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 0.0 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 563 001L1 FAMILIES, LEGISLATION & PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 35.7 Sophomore 1 3.6 B 12 42.9 Junior 13 46.4 C 6 21.4 Senior 12 42.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 7.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 21.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 46.4 Required by my major 19 67.9 3 hours 8 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 9 32.1 4 - 5 hours 1 3.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 3.4 27.6 69.0 3.7 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 3.4 0.0 44.8 51.7 3.4 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 3.4 31.0 65.5 3.6 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 3.4 31.0 62.1 3.5 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 3.4 34.5 62.1 3.6 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 3.4 6.9 31.0 58.6 3.4 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 3.4 24.1 72.4 3.7 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 17.2 82.8 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 27.6 72.4 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 3.4 20.7 75.9 3.7 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 3.4 31.0 65.5 3.6 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 3.4 27.6 69.0 3.7 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 6.9 31.0 62.1 3.6 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 6.9 31.0 62.1 3.6 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 3.4 34.5 62.1 3.6 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 10.3 37.9 51.7 3.4 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 6.9 48.3 44.8 3.4 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 3.4 13.8 82.8 3.8 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 82.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 659 001L1 ADVANCED CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Grisham-Brown, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 91.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 8.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 8 66.7 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 33.3 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 0.0 46.2 46.2 3.3 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 7.7 84.6 3.8 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 554 201L1 WORKING WITH PARENTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hallam, Rena ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 54.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 41.9 Junior 9 28.1 C 1 3.2 Senior 19 59.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 9.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.1 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 25.0 Studies Program 1 3.1 2 hours 14 43.8 Required by my major 27 84.4 3 hours 6 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 4 12.5 4 - 5 hours 4 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 62.9 37.1 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 3.0 18.2 45.5 33.3 3.1 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 14.3 51.4 31.4 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 5.7 5.7 54.3 34.3 3.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 5.7 62.9 31.4 3.3 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 2.9 14.3 51.4 31.4 3.1 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 65.7 34.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 8.6 57.1 34.3 3.3 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 2.9 11.4 54.3 31.4 3.1 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 2.9 42.9 54.3 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 3.1 62.5 34.4 3.3 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 2.9 2.9 57.1 37.1 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 2.9 22.9 45.7 28.6 3.0 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 2.9 51.4 45.7 3.4 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 5.7 62.9 31.4 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 2.9 8.8 55.9 32.4 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 3.1 12.5 53.1 31.3 3.1 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 11.4 57.1 31.4 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 6.1 18.2 42.4 33.3 3.0 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 5.7 14.3 54.3 25.7 3.0 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 2.9 11.8 52.9 32.4 3.1 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 94.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 557 001L1 INFANT DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hallam, Rena ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 63.6 Sophomore 3 13.6 B 6 27.3 Junior 9 40.9 C 2 9.1 Senior 9 40.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.5 Studies Program 2 9.1 2 hours 9 40.9 Required by my major 18 81.8 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.1 4 - 5 hours 5 22.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 13.6 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 71.4 23.8 3.2 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 85.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 668 001L1 ALLOCATION-FAM RESOURCES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hayhoe, Celia ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 90.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 10.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 36.4 Studies Program 2 20.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 6 60.0 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 8.3 8.3 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.90 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 350 401L1 CURR PLAN EARLY CHILD ED INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Manno, Charlotte ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 2 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 77.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 9 100.0 3 hours 5 55.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 660 001L1 AGING AND FAMILY VALUES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = McCulloch, Bethany J. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 61.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 38.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 13 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 4 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 11 84.6 4 - 5 hours 5 38.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 360 001L1 INTRO FAM INTERVEN: WORK W/FAMILIES & INDIVID INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Michaels, Marcia ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 52.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 47.8 Junior 10 43.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 56.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 21.7 Studies Program 1 4.3 2 hours 12 52.2 Required by my major 22 95.7 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 3.8 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 78.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 253 001L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY: DEVELOP BEHAVIOR AND ATTITUDES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nolan, Bill ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 8.6 A 16 45.7 Sophomore 13 37.1 B 19 54.3 Junior 13 37.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 37.1 Studies Program 4 11.4 2 hours 14 40.0 Required by my major 15 42.9 3 hours 5 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 16 45.7 4 - 5 hours 2 5.7 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 2.4 0.0 38.1 59.5 3.5 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 2.4 4.8 52.4 40.5 3.3 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 2.4 9.5 47.6 40.5 3.3 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 2.4 0.0 40.5 57.1 3.5 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 2.4 2.4 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 2.4 0.0 45.2 52.4 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 2.4 2.4 54.8 40.5 3.3 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 5.0 25.0 45.0 25.0 2.9 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 2.4 0.0 31.0 66.7 3.6 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 42 2.4 0.0 26.2 71.4 3.7 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 37 5.4 5.4 40.5 48.6 3.3 0.82 12. Satisfact answered class questions 42 2.4 0.0 33.3 64.3 3.6 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 4.8 2.4 28.6 64.3 3.5 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 41 4.9 12.2 36.6 46.3 3.2 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 2.6 5.1 51.3 41.0 3.3 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 5.3 2.6 44.7 47.4 3.3 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 2.9 5.7 42.9 48.6 3.4 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 2.4 2.4 39.0 56.1 3.5 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 2.5 7.5 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 0.0 4.8 23.8 71.4 3.7 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 84 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 475 201L1 SP TOPS IN IFDE: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nolan, Bill ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 86.4 Sophomore 2 9.1 B 3 13.6 Junior 1 4.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 19 86.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 81.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 9.1 Required by my major 3 13.6 3 hours 2 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 19 86.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 31.8 59.1 3.5 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 8.7 91.3 3.9 0.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 88.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 390 001L1 INTRO TO RESEARCH IN FAM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Malley, Angela ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 31.6 Sophomore 1 5.3 B 12 63.2 Junior 6 31.6 C 1 5.3 Senior 12 63.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 31.6 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 18 94.7 3 hours 3 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 10.0 25.0 40.0 25.0 2.8 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 20.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 5.0 0.0 55.0 40.0 3.3 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 5.0 15.0 55.0 25.0 3.0 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 20.0 55.0 20.0 2.9 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 5.0 0.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.76 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 5.0 5.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.81 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 10.0 35.0 40.0 15.0 2.6 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 5.0 55.0 35.0 3.2 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 5.0 0.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 36.8 47.4 5.3 2.5 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 5.0 15.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 60.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 544 001L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN AMER CHILDREN & FAMILIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Malley, Angela ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 22 56.4 Sophomore 1 2.6 B 17 43.6 Junior 12 30.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 22 56.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 10.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 15.4 Studies Program 1 2.6 2 hours 24 61.5 Required by my major 33 84.6 3 hours 8 20.5 Other (e.g. elective) 5 12.8 4 - 5 hours 1 2.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 46 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 4.3 23.9 58.7 13.0 2.8 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 47 0.0 8.5 63.8 27.7 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 47 0.0 6.4 53.2 40.4 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 47 0.0 0.0 61.7 38.3 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 47 0.0 14.9 53.2 31.9 3.2 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 47 0.0 6.4 57.4 36.2 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 47 2.1 12.8 63.8 21.3 3.0 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 47 4.3 4.3 55.3 36.2 3.2 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 47 0.0 0.0 48.9 51.1 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 41 2.4 2.4 58.5 36.6 3.3 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 47 2.1 0.0 55.3 42.6 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 47 4.3 10.6 55.3 29.8 3.1 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 47 0.0 2.1 51.1 46.8 3.4 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 2.2 39.1 58.7 3.6 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 44 0.0 4.5 65.9 29.5 3.3 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 45 0.0 4.4 51.1 44.4 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 2.2 11.1 55.6 31.1 3.2 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 47 2.1 12.8 46.8 38.3 3.2 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 47 2.1 12.8 51.1 34.0 3.2 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 47 Percent completed = 85.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 554 001L1 WORKING WITH PARENTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Malley, Angela ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 79.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 16.7 Junior 8 33.3 C 1 4.2 Senior 14 58.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 30.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 43.5 Required by my major 18 75.0 3 hours 4 17.4 Other (e.g. elective) 6 25.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 7.4 59.3 33.3 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 7.4 33.3 48.1 11.1 2.6 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 3.7 18.5 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 11.5 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 7.4 11.1 51.9 29.6 3.0 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 3.7 25.9 48.1 22.2 2.9 0.80 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 18.5 55.6 25.9 3.1 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 14.8 14.8 44.4 25.9 2.8 1.00 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 14.8 29.6 40.7 14.8 2.6 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 3.7 0.0 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 3.7 14.8 59.3 22.2 3.0 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 14.8 22.2 48.1 14.8 2.6 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 27 7.4 3.7 66.7 22.2 3.0 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 68.0 24.0 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 3.8 26.9 50.0 19.2 2.8 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 3.8 23.1 57.7 15.4 2.8 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 18.5 63.0 18.5 3.0 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 7.7 30.8 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 11.1 25.9 48.1 14.8 2.7 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 22.2 22.2 48.1 7.4 2.4 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 690 201L1 FAM/DEV RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Malley, Angela ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 41.7 41.7 16.7 2.8 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 54.5 27.3 18.2 2.6 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 16.7 41.7 33.3 8.3 2.3 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 16.7 8.3 50.0 25.0 2.8 1.03 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 8.3 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.90 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 16.7 41.7 25.0 16.7 2.4 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 8.3 50.0 25.0 16.7 2.5 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 41.7 33.3 16.7 2.6 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 555 001L1 FOSTERING COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Routt, Mary L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 93.3 Sophomore 1 6.7 B 1 6.7 Junior 4 26.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 6.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 13.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 60.0 Required by my major 13 86.7 3 hours 1 6.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 0.0 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 252 001L1 INTRODUCTION TO FAMILY SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Smith, Donna S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 99 59.3 A 70 42.2 Sophomore 40 24.0 B 85 51.2 Junior 16 9.6 C 11 6.6 Senior 12 7.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 90 54.2 Studies Program 107 64.5 2 hours 39 23.5 Required by my major 20 12.0 3 hours 29 17.5 Other (e.g. elective) 39 23.5 4 - 5 hours 6 3.6 6 - 7 hours 1 0.6 8 or more hours 1 0.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 176 0.0 0.6 43.8 55.7 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 176 1.7 7.4 46.6 44.3 3.3 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 168 0.6 7.7 51.8 39.9 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 176 2.8 8.0 48.3 40.9 3.3 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 175 0.6 7.4 47.4 44.6 3.4 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 170 0.0 4.1 55.9 40.0 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 173 0.0 2.9 59.0 38.2 3.4 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 163 4.3 12.9 54.0 28.8 3.1 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 176 0.6 3.4 40.3 55.7 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 176 0.6 1.1 31.8 66.5 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 150 0.0 2.7 51.3 46.0 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 175 1.7 1.1 50.3 46.9 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 176 1.7 9.7 31.3 57.4 3.4 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 176 0.0 5.1 34.7 60.2 3.6 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 174 1.1 2.9 50.6 45.4 3.4 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 167 1.2 7.8 55.1 35.9 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 164 1.2 8.5 53.7 36.6 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 174 1.1 2.3 46.6 50.0 3.5 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 171 4.1 16.4 45.6 33.9 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 173 1.2 8.1 31.8 59.0 3.5 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 173 1.7 3.5 28.9 65.9 3.6 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 22 0.0 22.7 59.1 18.2 3.0 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 30 0.0 10.0 66.7 23.3 3.1 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 29 0.0 10.3 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 296 Number of forms scanned = 179 Number of forms with at least one student response = 177 Percent completed = 59.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 401 001L1 NORMAL FAM DEVELOPMENT AND PROCESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Smith, Donna S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 25.0 Junior 2 16.7 C 1 8.3 Senior 10 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 54.5 Required by my major 10 83.3 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 16.7 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Human Env Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HES 400 001L1 CONCEPTS HES:INTEGR/APPL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Glass-Lamb, Tracey ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 92.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 8.0 Junior 1 4.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 24 96.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 22 88.0 Studies Program 1 4.0 2 hours 2 8.0 Required by my major 24 96.0 3 hours 1 4.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 7.4 3.7 48.1 40.7 3.2 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 6.9 10.3 44.8 37.9 3.1 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 5.3 5.3 52.6 36.8 3.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 3.6 3.6 53.6 39.3 3.3 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 6.9 51.7 37.9 3.2 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 6.9 10.3 51.7 31.0 3.1 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 10.3 51.7 37.9 3.3 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 26 3.8 19.2 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 13.8 48.3 34.5 3.1 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 10.7 14.3 53.6 21.4 2.9 0.89 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 10.7 14.3 53.6 21.4 2.9 0.89 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 14.3 14.3 50.0 21.4 2.8 0.96 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 14.3 7.1 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.93 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 21.4 14.3 42.9 21.4 2.6 1.06 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 24.1 17.2 34.5 24.1 2.6 1.12 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 10.3 10.3 48.3 31.0 3.0 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 96.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Human Env Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HES 400 401L1 CONCEPTS HES:INTEGR/APPL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Glass-Lamb, Tracey ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 25.0 Junior 1 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 91.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 58.3 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 61.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Human Env Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HES 400 402L1 CONCEPTS HES:INTEGR/APPL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Glass-Lamb, Tracey ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 100.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 27.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Human Env Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HES 100 002L1 INTRO TO PROFESS IN HES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rey-Barreau, Joseph A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 19.4 A 25 83.3 Sophomore 10 32.3 B 2 6.7 Junior 10 32.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 16.1 D 1 3.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 6.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 23 76.7 Studies Program 1 3.2 2 hours 6 20.0 Required by my major 29 93.5 3 hours 1 3.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 2.9 0.0 51.4 45.7 3.4 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 20.0 0.0 0.0 80.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 8.6 11.4 48.6 31.4 3.0 0.89 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 2.9 2.9 42.9 51.4 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 2.9 2.9 42.9 51.4 3.4 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 2.9 0.0 51.4 45.7 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 26.5 41.2 29.4 3.0 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 5.7 2.9 51.4 40.0 3.3 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 5.7 0.0 37.1 57.1 3.5 0.78 11. Was available for consultation 30 3.3 3.3 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 2.9 0.0 40.0 57.1 3.5 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 5.7 5.7 42.9 45.7 3.3 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 35 2.9 0.0 42.9 54.3 3.5 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 3.1 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 6.1 6.1 54.5 33.3 3.2 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 6.1 6.1 45.5 42.4 3.2 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 6.1 6.1 42.4 45.5 3.3 0.84 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 6.1 21.2 48.5 24.2 2.9 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 11.4 22.9 42.9 22.9 2.8 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 8.6 22.9 68.6 3.6 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 68.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Human Env Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HES 100 401L1 INTRO TO PROFESS IN HES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Scott, Ruth Ann ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 9.8 A 37 90.2 Sophomore 8 19.5 B 1 2.4 Junior 14 34.1 C 1 2.4 Senior 11 26.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 9.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 4.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 30 76.9 Studies Program 4 9.8 2 hours 6 15.4 Required by my major 32 78.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 12.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 0.0 38.6 61.4 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 9.5 40.5 50.0 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 4.5 4.5 34.1 56.8 3.4 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 2.6 38.5 59.0 3.6 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 2.3 4.5 45.5 47.7 3.4 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 2.3 2.3 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 42 0.0 4.8 54.8 40.5 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 2.3 44.2 53.5 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 4.5 15.9 45.5 34.1 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 44 0.0 4.5 43.2 52.3 3.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 43 0.0 14.0 55.8 30.2 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 42 2.4 11.9 54.8 31.0 3.1 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 2.4 11.9 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 0.0 9.5 40.5 50.0 3.4 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 7.3 19.5 41.5 31.7 3.0 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 4.5 13.6 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 43 2.3 7.0 41.9 48.8 3.4 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 97.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. -Human Env Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HES 100 001L1 INTRO TO PROFESS IN HES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wesley, Myrna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 20.5 A 42 95.5 Sophomore 17 38.6 B 2 4.5 Junior 12 27.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 13.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 34 77.3 Studies Program 2 4.7 2 hours 6 13.6 Required by my major 35 81.4 3 hours 4 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 14.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 2.3 9.1 52.3 36.4 3.2 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 11.6 18.6 53.5 16.3 2.7 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 2.3 2.3 51.2 44.2 3.4 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 2.3 18.6 51.2 27.9 3.0 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 12.5 20.0 47.5 20.0 2.8 0.93 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 2.3 30.2 44.2 23.3 2.9 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 2.3 63.6 34.1 3.3 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 35 0.0 2.9 71.4 25.7 3.2 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 2.4 68.3 29.3 3.3 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 27.9 18.6 34.9 18.6 2.4 1.10 14. Encouraged class participation 44 2.3 13.6 56.8 27.3 3.1 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 41 2.4 17.1 56.1 24.4 3.0 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 9.8 26.8 46.3 17.1 2.7 0.87 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 7.7 33.3 43.6 15.4 2.7 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 0.0 11.6 67.4 20.9 3.1 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 43 20.9 27.9 32.6 18.6 2.5 1.03 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 27.3 31.8 34.1 6.8 2.2 0.93 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 4.5 27.3 52.3 15.9 2.8 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 89.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 114 001L1 INTRO TO MERCHANDISING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anderson, Joan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 17.9 A 28 71.8 Sophomore 16 41.0 B 9 23.1 Junior 9 23.1 C 1 2.6 Senior 7 17.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 35.9 Studies Program 3 7.7 2 hours 15 38.5 Required by my major 25 64.1 3 hours 6 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 11 28.2 4 - 5 hours 3 7.7 6 - 7 hours 1 2.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 43 0.0 0.0 23.3 76.7 3.8 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 0.0 9.3 41.9 48.8 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 0.0 22.5 77.5 3.8 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 43 0.0 2.3 25.6 72.1 3.7 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 0.0 26.2 73.8 3.7 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 0.0 32.6 67.4 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 43 0.0 7.0 37.2 55.8 3.5 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 0.0 0.0 37.2 62.8 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 43 0.0 0.0 14.0 86.0 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 41 0.0 0.0 29.3 70.7 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 0.0 20.9 79.1 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 0.0 0.0 32.6 67.4 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 43 0.0 0.0 27.9 72.1 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 0.0 0.0 48.7 51.3 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 43 0.0 2.3 51.2 46.5 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 40 0.0 5.0 52.5 42.5 3.4 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 0.0 0.0 34.9 65.1 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 43 0.0 9.3 34.9 55.8 3.5 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 0.0 2.4 38.1 59.5 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 43 Number of forms with at least one student response = 43 Percent completed = 71.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 525 001L1 ECONOMICS OF THE APPAREL AND TEXTILE INDUSTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anderson, Joan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 53.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 46.9 Junior 10 31.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 22 68.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 40.6 Required by my major 29 90.6 3 hours 10 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 9.4 4 - 5 hours 5 15.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 3.1 0.0 28.1 68.8 3.6 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 6.3 53.1 40.6 3.3 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 3.1 0.0 40.6 56.3 3.5 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 3.1 3.1 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 12.5 40.6 46.9 3.3 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 6.9 55.2 34.5 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 3.1 0.0 37.5 59.4 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 3.1 25.0 71.9 3.7 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 0.0 3.3 60.0 36.7 3.3 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 3.3 63.3 33.3 3.3 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 3.2 6.5 54.8 35.5 3.2 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 3.2 25.8 71.0 3.7 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DMT 121 001A2 TEXTILES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = BAKER, MARJORIS ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 9 69.2 B 5 41.7 Junior 2 15.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 15.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 75.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 13 100.0 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 14.3 7.1 50.0 28.6 2.9 1.00 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 14.3 35.7 42.9 3.1 0.95 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 14.3 28.6 35.7 21.4 2.6 1.01 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 14.3 28.6 35.7 21.4 2.6 1.01 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 28.6 28.6 28.6 14.3 2.3 1.07 11. Was available for consultation 11 27.3 0.0 54.5 18.2 2.6 1.12 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 28.6 14.3 35.7 21.4 2.5 1.16 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 21.4 50.0 14.3 14.3 2.2 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 12.5 25.0 25.0 37.5 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 15.4 7.7 46.2 30.8 2.9 1.04 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 20.0 10.0 30.0 40.0 2.9 1.20 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 14.3 7.1 50.0 28.6 2.9 1.00 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 14.3 57.1 14.3 14.3 2.3 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 21.4 14.3 35.7 28.6 2.7 1.14 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 28.6 14.3 35.7 21.4 2.5 1.16. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DMT 121 002A2 TEXTILES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = BAKER, MARJORIS ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 8.3 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 4 33.3 B 4 33.3 Junior 6 50.0 C 1 8.3 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 75.0 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 11 91.7 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 13.3 26.7 46.7 13.3 2.6 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 13.3 20.0 53.3 13.3 2.7 0.90 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 46.7 40.0 13.3 2.7 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 2.9 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 40.0 53.3 6.7 2.7 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 2.8 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 28.6 28.6 35.7 7.1 2.2 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 88.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DMT 232 001O1 APPAREL PRODUCT STUDIO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baker, Marjorie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 33.3 Junior 4 33.3 C 1 8.3 Senior 8 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 6 50.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 50.0 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 5 41.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 13.3 0.0 66.7 20.0 2.9 0.88 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 20.0 20.0 53.3 6.7 2.5 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 13.3 26.7 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 33.3 20.0 46.7 0.0 2.1 0.92 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 26.7 20.0 53.3 0.0 2.3 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 13.3 20.0 66.7 0.0 2.5 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 13.3 46.7 40.0 0.0 2.3 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 13.3 33.3 53.3 0.0 2.4 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 33.3 50.0 8.3 2.6 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 2.8 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 20.0 26.7 40.0 13.3 2.5 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 13.3 46.7 33.3 6.7 2.3 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 13.3 46.7 33.3 6.7 2.3 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 356 001O1 INTERIOR DESIGN STUDIO 2 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beert, Daniel ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 69.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 30.8 Junior 11 84.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 15.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 13 100.0 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 4 30.8 8 or more hours 4 30.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 6.7 46.7 46.7 0.0 2.4 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 10.0 40.0 50.0 0.0 2.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 21.4 28.6 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 81.8 18.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 44.4 22.2 33.3 0.0 1.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 13.3 13.3 66.7 6.7 2.7 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 13.3 20.0 46.7 20.0 2.7 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 85.7 7.1 3.0 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 6.7 26.7 53.3 13.3 2.7 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 40.0 53.3 0.0 2.5 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 13.3 46.7 40.0 0.0 2.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 46.7 40.0 6.7 2.5 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 93.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 367 001L1 COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beert, Daniel ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 88.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 11.1 Junior 5 55.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 22.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 6 66.7 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 3 33.3 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 18.2 27.3 54.5 0.0 2.4 0.81 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 9.1 0.0 81.8 9.1 2.9 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 44.4 44.4 11.1 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 55.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 142 001L1 HISTORY & THEORY OF INTERIOR DESIGN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carll-White, Allison ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 30.4 A 22 32.4 Sophomore 29 42.0 B 34 50.0 Junior 13 18.8 C 10 14.7 Senior 6 8.7 D 1 1.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 24 34.8 Studies Program 27 39.1 2 hours 19 27.5 Required by my major 33 47.8 3 hours 17 24.6 Other (e.g. elective) 9 13.0 4 - 5 hours 7 10.1 6 - 7 hours 1 1.4 8 or more hours 1 1.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 78 0.0 2.6 65.4 32.1 3.3 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 77 15.6 24.7 50.6 9.1 2.5 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 73 8.2 13.7 64.4 13.7 2.8 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 78 0.0 7.7 56.4 35.9 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 78 1.3 6.4 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 74 1.4 4.1 70.3 24.3 3.2 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 77 0.0 5.2 67.5 27.3 3.2 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 64 3.1 31.3 56.3 9.4 2.7 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 77 2.6 6.5 53.2 37.7 3.3 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 77 0.0 2.6 44.2 53.2 3.5 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 67 0.0 4.5 55.2 40.3 3.4 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 76 0.0 6.6 53.9 39.5 3.3 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 77 5.2 11.7 53.2 29.9 3.1 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 71 5.6 23.9 59.2 11.3 2.8 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 58 0.0 10.3 70.7 19.0 3.1 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 72 1.4 13.9 68.1 16.7 3.0 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 60 1.7 30.0 55.0 13.3 2.8 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 76 1.3 2.6 65.8 30.3 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 74 5.4 20.3 52.7 21.6 2.9 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 74 4.1 16.2 45.9 33.8 3.1 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 74 2.7 18.9 41.9 36.5 3.1 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 6.3 25.0 68.8 0.0 2.6 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 22 4.5 9.1 77.3 9.1 2.9 0.61 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.0 2.9 0.29 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 100 Number of forms scanned = 83 Number of forms with at least one student response = 78 Percent completed = 78.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 558 001O1 INTERIOR DESIGN STUDIO 4 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carll-White, Allison ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 18.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 72.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 9.1 Senior 9 81.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 18.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 9.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 81.8 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 10 90.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 2.6 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 10.0 10.0 80.0 0.0 2.7 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 0.0 77.8 11.1 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DMT 247 001L1 DRESS AND CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carr, Chad ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 11.1 A 32 91.4 Sophomore 11 30.6 B 1 2.9 Junior 15 41.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 13.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 5.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 58.3 Studies Program 18 50.0 2 hours 8 22.2 Required by my major 11 30.6 3 hours 5 13.9 Other (e.g. elective) 7 19.4 4 - 5 hours 1 2.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 43 0.0 0.0 37.2 62.8 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 43 0.0 4.7 37.2 58.1 3.5 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 0.0 7.0 41.9 51.2 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 0.0 0.0 34.9 65.1 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 43 0.0 0.0 32.6 67.4 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 0.0 0.0 34.9 65.1 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 0.0 11.9 42.9 45.2 3.3 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 0.0 4.7 39.5 55.8 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 43 0.0 9.3 48.8 41.9 3.3 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 44.1 55.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 7.0 32.6 60.5 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 0.0 11.9 38.1 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 43 0.0 2.3 34.9 62.8 3.6 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 41 0.0 2.4 41.5 56.1 3.5 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 12.5 45.0 42.5 3.3 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 2.9 28.6 28.6 40.0 3.1 0.91 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 2.4 46.3 51.2 3.5 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 2.4 26.8 36.6 34.1 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 0.0 12.2 31.7 56.1 3.4 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 5.0 2.5 32.5 60.0 3.5 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 43 Number of forms with at least one student response = 43 Percent completed = 89.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DMT 247 401L1 DRESS AND CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carr, Chad ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 29.0 A 28 90.3 Sophomore 7 22.6 B 2 6.5 Junior 9 29.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 19.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 64.5 Studies Program 16 51.6 2 hours 9 29.0 Required by my major 7 22.6 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 25.8 4 - 5 hours 2 6.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 0.0 3.0 24.2 72.7 3.7 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 6.1 36.4 57.6 3.5 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 3.0 21.2 75.8 3.7 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 3.0 24.2 72.7 3.7 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 3.0 33.3 63.6 3.6 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 21.2 78.8 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 3.1 25.0 37.5 34.4 3.0 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 6.1 12.1 30.3 51.5 3.3 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 3.0 18.2 42.4 36.4 3.1 0.82 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 13.3 43.3 43.3 3.3 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 3.0 6.1 39.4 51.5 3.4 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 9.1 12.1 33.3 45.5 3.2 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 3.0 36.4 60.6 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 6.3 40.6 53.1 3.5 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 6.3 6.3 46.9 40.6 3.2 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 10.3 20.7 34.5 34.5 2.9 1.00 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 3.1 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 12.5 28.1 25.0 34.4 2.8 1.06 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 0.0 24.2 30.3 45.5 3.2 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 6.1 15.2 27.3 51.5 3.2 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 11.1 33.3 33.3 22.2 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 71.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DMT 237 001L1 VISUAL DESIGN IN DRESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Coleman, Vivian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 17.4 A 13 56.5 Sophomore 7 30.4 B 10 43.5 Junior 9 39.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 13.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 17.4 Studies Program 1 4.3 2 hours 9 39.1 Required by my major 18 78.3 3 hours 7 30.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 17.4 4 - 5 hours 3 13.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 4.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 0.0 56.0 40.0 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 4.0 8.0 36.0 52.0 3.4 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 4.0 20.0 48.0 28.0 3.0 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 4.0 24.0 40.0 32.0 3.0 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 4.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 24 8.3 4.2 54.2 33.3 3.1 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 4.0 0.0 36.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 12.0 40.0 48.0 3.4 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 12.0 44.0 44.0 3.3 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 8.0 0.0 36.0 56.0 3.4 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 56.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 234 001L1 HUMAN FACTORS OF DESIGN THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dickson, Ann A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 51.2 Sophomore 15 35.7 B 19 46.3 Junior 17 40.5 C 1 2.4 Senior 9 21.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 22.0 Studies Program 2 4.9 2 hours 12 29.3 Required by my major 38 92.7 3 hours 13 31.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.4 4 - 5 hours 6 14.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 2.3 2.3 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 31.8 36.4 29.5 2.3 2.0 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 44 6.8 11.4 68.2 13.6 2.9 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 2.7 8.1 81.1 8.1 2.9 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 43 20.9 25.6 44.2 9.3 2.4 0.93 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 2.3 11.6 79.1 7.0 2.9 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 32.6 48.8 14.0 4.7 1.9 0.81 8. Graded assignments included comments 43 18.6 25.6 48.8 7.0 2.4 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 4.7 30.2 55.8 9.3 2.7 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 2.3 52.3 45.5 3.4 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 40 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 44 2.3 13.6 68.2 15.9 3.0 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 11.4 29.5 47.7 11.4 2.6 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 44 4.5 9.1 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 44 2.3 13.6 65.9 18.2 3.0 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 44 2.3 6.8 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 9.8 39.0 46.3 4.9 2.5 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 7.0 34.9 51.2 7.0 2.6 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 11.9 28.6 47.6 11.9 2.6 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 53 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 83.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 120 001L1 TEXTILES FOR CONSUMERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Easter, Elizabeth P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 9.3 A 22 50.0 Sophomore 17 39.5 B 18 40.9 Junior 19 44.2 C 4 9.1 Senior 3 7.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 20.5 Studies Program 1 2.3 2 hours 15 34.1 Required by my major 35 81.4 3 hours 14 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 7 16.3 4 - 5 hours 6 13.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 46 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 2.2 6.5 56.5 34.8 3.2 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 2.3 7.0 58.1 32.6 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 46 0.0 4.3 54.3 41.3 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 46 2.2 2.2 50.0 45.7 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 4.7 9.3 37.2 48.8 3.3 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 0.0 6.5 45.7 47.8 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 20.6 55.9 20.6 2.9 2.1 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 46 4.3 6.5 54.3 34.8 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 46 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 34 8.8 20.6 52.9 17.6 2.8 0.84 12. Satisfact answered class questions 46 2.2 6.5 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 46 6.5 28.3 56.5 8.7 2.7 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 43 11.6 32.6 44.2 11.6 2.6 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 3.1 21.9 62.5 12.5 2.8 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 2.5 17.5 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 6.3 28.1 56.3 9.4 2.7 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 2.2 8.7 60.9 28.3 3.2 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 8.9 42.2 44.4 4.4 2.4 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 46 2.2 10.9 50.0 37.0 3.2 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 46 6.5 15.2 50.0 28.3 3.0 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 47 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 46 Percent completed = 97.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 515 001L1 SPECIFICATION & EVAL OF TEXTILES AND APPAREL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Easter, Elizabeth P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 20.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 45.8 Junior 7 29.2 C 8 33.3 Senior 17 70.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.2 Studies Program 1 4.2 2 hours 1 4.2 Required by my major 23 95.8 3 hours 6 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 7 29.2 6 - 7 hours 4 16.7 8 or more hours 5 20.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 76.0 20.0 3.2 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 0.0 92.3 3.8 3.0 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 42.3 50.0 7.7 2.7 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 7.7 42.3 46.2 3.8 2.5 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 3.8 11.5 80.8 3.8 2.8 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 4.0 24.0 68.0 4.0 2.7 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 11.5 42.3 46.2 0.0 2.3 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 7.7 19.2 69.2 3.8 2.7 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 24 4.2 37.5 54.2 4.2 2.6 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 23.1 30.8 38.5 7.7 2.3 0.93 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 23.1 53.8 15.4 7.7 2.1 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 26 11.5 34.6 46.2 7.7 2.5 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 18.2 18.2 54.5 9.1 2.5 0.91 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 16.7 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 27.3 59.1 13.6 2.9 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 8.0 76.0 16.0 3.1 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 16.0 56.0 20.0 8.0 2.2 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 46.2 34.6 15.4 2.6 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 42.3 34.6 19.2 3.8 1.8 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 254 001O1 COLOR THEORY AND APPLICATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goss, Clifford R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 100.0 Sophomore 2 18.2 B 0 0.0 Junior 4 36.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 36.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 4 36.4 8 or more hours 3 27.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DMT 151 001O1 CREATIVE DESIGN FOUNDTNS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lindberg, Laurie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 50.0 A 10 83.3 Sophomore 4 33.3 B 2 16.7 Junior 2 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 41.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = DMT 151 002O1 CREATIVE DESIGN FOUNDTNS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lindberg, Laurie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 50.0 A 7 70.0 Sophomore 4 40.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 10.0 Required by my major 10 100.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 30.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 18.2 36.4 36.4 3.0 1.00 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 10.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 3.1 1.10 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 244 001L1 HISTORY & THEORY OF 20TH CENTURY DESIGN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rey-Barreau, Joseph A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 6.9 A 21 77.8 Sophomore 15 51.7 B 6 22.2 Junior 10 34.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 6.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 37.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 41.4 Required by my major 27 96.4 3 hours 5 17.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.6 4 - 5 hours 1 3.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 43.3 56.7 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 6.7 36.7 56.7 3.5 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 10.3 37.9 51.7 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 0.0 31.0 69.0 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 69.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 359 001L1 SP TOP IDMT: 3D EXPLOR IN INT DES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rothgeb, Terry D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 15.4 A 8 61.5 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 4 30.8 Junior 6 46.2 C 1 7.7 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 41.7 3 hours 5 38.5 Other (e.g. elective) 7 58.3 4 - 5 hours 7 53.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 45.5 45.5 9.1 2.6 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 45.5 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 38.5 38.5 23.1 2.8 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 38.5 15.4 46.2 3.1 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 490 001O1 INTERNSHIP INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rothgeb, Terry D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 14.3 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 85.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 7 100.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 558 002O1 INTERIOR DESIGN STUDIO 4 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rothgeb, Terry D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 16.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 8.3 Senior 12 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 11 91.7 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 8 66.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 18.2 54.5 27.3 0.0 2.1 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 50.0 41.7 8.3 2.6 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 54.5 27.3 9.1 2.4 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 359 002L1 SP TOP IDMT: PROBLEM SOLVING IN MERCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wickliffe, Vanessa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 55.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 16 44.4 Junior 6 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 30 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 25.0 Studies Program 3 8.3 2 hours 17 47.2 Required by my major 27 75.0 3 hours 8 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 6 16.7 4 - 5 hours 2 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 0.0 0.0 55.3 44.7 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 2.6 5.3 52.6 39.5 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 2.6 55.3 42.1 3.4 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 2.6 10.5 47.4 39.5 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 34.2 65.8 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 2.6 44.7 52.6 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 2.6 5.3 50.0 42.1 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 38 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 2.7 0.0 62.2 35.1 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 2.9 2.9 50.0 44.1 3.4 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 2.6 0.0 55.3 42.1 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 2.6 13.2 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 2.6 5.3 57.9 34.2 3.2 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 2.6 5.3 36.8 55.3 3.4 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 64.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Int Design, Merchandising, & Text FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = DMT 559 201L1 SP TOPS IDMT: INTER- NATIONAL MERCHANDISING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wickliffe, Vanessa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 88.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 55.6 Studies Program 1 11.1 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 6 66.7 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 22.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 31.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HMT 210 001L1 HOTEL ROOMS DIVISION MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Desmond ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 3 20.0 B 7 43.8 Junior 7 46.7 C 4 25.0 Senior 5 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 1 6.3 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 13 81.3 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 11.8 11.8 76.5 0.0 2.6 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 17.6 35.3 47.1 0.0 2.3 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 23.1 69.2 0.0 2.6 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 17.6 41.2 35.3 5.9 2.3 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 23.5 29.4 47.1 0.0 2.2 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 18.2 18.2 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 23.5 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 12.5 43.8 43.8 0.0 2.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 11.8 29.4 58.8 0.0 2.5 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 17 5.9 17.6 76.5 0.0 2.7 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 5.9 23.5 64.7 5.9 2.7 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 12.5 37.5 50.0 0.0 2.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 17 11.8 5.9 82.4 0.0 2.7 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 6.7 6.7 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 6.3 25.0 68.8 0.0 2.6 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 12.5 18.8 62.5 6.3 2.6 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 88.2 5.9 3.0 0.35 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 12.5 43.8 37.5 6.3 2.4 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 17.6 35.3 41.2 5.9 2.4 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 23.5 35.3 41.2 0.0 2.2 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 68.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HMT 270 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF TRAVEL AND TOURISM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Desmond ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 6.7 Sophomore 2 13.3 B 11 73.3 Junior 5 33.3 C 1 6.7 Senior 8 53.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 13.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 53.3 Studies Program 1 6.7 2 hours 4 26.7 Required by my major 10 66.7 3 hours 2 13.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 26.7 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 6.3 12.5 75.0 6.3 2.8 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 12.5 31.3 56.3 0.0 2.4 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 30.0 30.0 40.0 0.0 2.1 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 18.8 31.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 12.5 25.0 62.5 0.0 2.5 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 7.7 15.4 76.9 0.0 2.7 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 43.8 56.3 0.0 2.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 6.3 12.5 81.3 0.0 2.8 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 6.3 6.3 87.5 0.0 2.8 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 37.5 56.3 0.0 2.5 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 12.5 81.3 0.0 2.8 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 16.7 8.3 75.0 0.0 2.6 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 14.3 21.4 64.3 0.0 2.5 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 13.3 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 31.3 56.3 6.3 2.6 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 12.5 31.3 56.3 0.0 2.4 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 18.8 25.0 56.3 0.0 2.4 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 61.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HMT 345 001L1 INFO TECHNOLOGY IN HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ham, Seonok ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 63.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 27.3 Junior 2 18.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 81.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 9.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 45.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 36.4 Required by my major 9 81.8 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 18.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 15.4 0.0 38.5 46.2 3.2 1.07 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = NFS 204 001L1 PRINS - FOOD PREPARATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cook-Newell, Margaret E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 73.1 Sophomore 3 11.1 B 5 19.2 Junior 15 55.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 7.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 51.9 Studies Program 1 3.7 2 hours 8 29.6 Required by my major 22 81.5 3 hours 3 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 4 14.8 4 - 5 hours 2 7.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 6.5 71.0 22.6 3.2 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 6.5 64.5 29.0 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 6.5 67.7 25.8 3.2 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 9.7 67.7 22.6 3.1 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 3.2 9.7 64.5 22.6 3.1 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 6.7 46.7 33.3 13.3 2.5 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 2.9 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 9.7 58.1 32.3 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 32.3 67.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 3.8 0.0 76.9 19.2 3.1 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 0.0 79.3 20.7 3.2 0.41 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 6.9 72.4 20.7 3.1 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 77.4 22.6 3.2 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 6.5 64.5 29.0 3.2 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 3.2 3.2 67.7 25.8 3.2 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 3.2 0.0 35.5 61.3 3.5 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 33. Amount of work appropriate 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 34. Instructor explained expectations 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 35. Instructor helped with my problems 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 96.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = NFS 212 001L1 INTRODUCTORY NUTRITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cook-Newell, Margaret E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 7.7 A 24 92.3 Sophomore 12 46.2 B 2 7.7 Junior 9 34.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 11.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 46.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 38.5 Required by my major 22 84.6 3 hours 2 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 15.4 4 - 5 hours 2 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 12.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 7.4 44.4 48.1 3.4 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 3.7 22.2 74.1 3.7 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 67.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = NFS 241 001L1 FOOD SERVICE SANITATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cook-Newell, Margaret E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 1.9 A 51 100.0 Sophomore 12 23.1 B 0 0.0 Junior 23 44.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 16 30.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 36 69.2 Studies Program 2 3.8 2 hours 11 21.2 Required by my major 50 96.2 3 hours 5 9.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 55 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 56 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 55 0.0 1.8 47.3 50.9 3.5 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 56 0.0 0.0 44.6 55.4 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 56 0.0 0.0 48.2 51.8 3.5 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 56 1.8 1.8 48.2 48.2 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 56 3.6 21.4 44.6 30.4 3.0 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 55 1.8 12.7 56.4 29.1 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 56 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 56 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 54 0.0 0.0 42.6 57.4 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 56 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 55 0.0 5.5 50.9 43.6 3.4 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 56 0.0 7.1 44.6 48.2 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 0.0 9.6 59.6 30.8 3.2 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 50 0.0 14.0 56.0 30.0 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 56 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 5.8 23.1 44.2 26.9 2.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 55 1.8 7.3 58.2 32.7 3.2 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 54 0.0 3.7 40.7 55.6 3.5 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 68 Number of forms scanned = 59 Number of forms with at least one student response = 57 Percent completed = 83.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = NFS 342 001L1 QUANTITY FOOD PRODUCTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cook-Newell, Margaret E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 88.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 22.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 7 87.5 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 2.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 44.4 55.6 0.0 2.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 20.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = NFS 342 002L1 QUANTITY FOOD PRODUCTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cook-Newell, Margaret E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 6 54.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 45.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 54.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 11 100.0 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 23.1 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 23.1 30.8 46.2 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = NFS 510 001L2 ADVANCED NUTRITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forsythe, Hazel W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 69.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 27.6 Junior 8 26.7 C 1 3.4 Senior 21 70.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 36.7 Required by my major 26 86.7 3 hours 10 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 13.3 4 - 5 hours 6 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 1 3.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 8.0 28.0 32.0 32.0 2.9 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 3.0 21.2 75.8 3.7 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 2.9 26.5 70.6 3.7 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 3.0 12.1 84.8 3.8 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 3.0 18.2 78.8 3.8 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 0.0 3.0 18.2 78.8 3.8 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 3.0 24.2 72.7 3.7 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 0.0 24.2 75.8 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 7.4 37.0 55.6 3.5 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 9.1 33.3 57.6 3.5 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 9.4 40.6 50.0 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 2.9 38.2 58.8 3.6 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 0.0 5.9 38.2 55.9 3.5 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 0.0 3.0 36.4 60.6 3.6 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 0.0 3.0 12.1 84.8 3.8 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 82.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = NFS 511 001L1 THERAPEUTIC NUTRITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gaetke, Lisa M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 28.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 17 68.0 Junior 5 18.5 C 1 4.0 Senior 22 81.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 25.9 Required by my major 26 96.3 3 hours 14 51.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.7 4 - 5 hours 4 14.8 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 6.9 27.6 65.5 3.6 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 0.0 19.4 80.6 3.8 0.40 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 3.2 0.0 25.8 71.0 3.6 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 3.2 22.6 74.2 3.7 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 0.0 22.6 77.4 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 9.7 90.3 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 16.1 83.9 3.8 0.37 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 0.0 16.1 83.9 3.8 0.37 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 3.2 19.4 77.4 3.7 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 3.4 31.0 65.5 3.6 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 3.7 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 3.2 22.6 74.2 3.7 0.53 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 3.4 24.1 72.4 3.7 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 0.0 20.7 79.3 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 86.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = NFS 810 001O1 THERAPEUTIC NUTRITION: PRACTICUM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gaetke, Lisa M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 30.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 69.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 10 83.3 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 11 91.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 7.7 84.6 3.8 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = NFS 408G001S1 SEM IN FOOD & NUTRITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Stephenson, Tammy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 75.0 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 11 91.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = NFS 101 001L1 HUMAN NUTRITION AND WELLNESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Vivian, Beverly ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 10.0 A 12 38.7 Sophomore 10 33.3 B 11 35.5 Junior 8 26.7 C 5 16.1 Senior 9 30.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 9.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 50.0 Studies Program 5 16.1 2 hours 9 30.0 Required by my major 12 38.7 3 hours 4 13.3 Other (e.g. elective) 14 45.2 4 - 5 hours 2 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 48.7 51.3 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 38 0.0 2.6 57.9 39.5 3.4 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 8.8 47.1 44.1 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 0.0 2.6 53.8 43.6 3.4 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 2.9 47.1 50.0 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 5.4 5.4 48.6 40.5 3.2 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 5.9 5.9 50.0 38.2 3.2 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 0.0 7.9 44.7 47.4 3.4 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 2.6 39.5 57.9 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 2.6 52.6 44.7 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 2.6 57.9 39.5 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 2.6 7.7 51.3 38.5 3.3 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 5.4 62.2 32.4 3.3 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 6.5 61.3 32.3 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 2.9 64.7 32.4 3.3 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 16.1 48.4 35.5 3.2 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 5.4 10.8 51.4 32.4 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 8.3 61.1 30.6 3.2 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 8.6 54.3 37.1 3.3 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 151 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 26.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = NFS 101 202L1 HUMAN NUTRITION AND WELLNESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Vivian, Beverly ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 2 28.6 B 4 57.1 Junior 2 28.6 C 1 14.3 Senior 3 42.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 42.9 Studies Program 1 14.3 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = NFS 480 001O1 DIETETICS PRE-PROFESS PRACTICE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wesley, Myrna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 25.0 Required by my major 4 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 25.0 8 or more hours 1 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 50.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 2.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 4 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 2.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 60.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 1.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 50.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 2.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 50.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 2.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Nutrition and Food Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = NFS 818 001L1 EVAL DIETETIC PRACTICES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Wesley, Myrna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 30.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 69.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 7.7 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 11 84.6 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 6 46.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 8.3 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 7.7 0.0 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.80 11. Was available for consultation 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 7.7 15.4 46.2 30.8 3.0 0.91 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 7.7 30.8 53.8 3.3 0.95 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 15.4 46.2 30.8 3.0 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 15.4 15.4 38.5 30.8 2.8 1.07 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 38.5 7.7 46.2 2.9 1.12. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************