****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 700 001S1 SPEC PROBLEMS IN HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Albisetti, James C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 12.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 12.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 25.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 4 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 001L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 30.0 A 1 10.0 Sophomore 3 30.0 B 8 80.0 Junior 4 40.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 9 90.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 1 10.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 2.6 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 18.2 18.2 54.5 9.1 2.5 0.93 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 10.0 0.0 90.0 0.0 2.8 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 45.5 9.1 27.3 18.2 2.2 1.25 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 20.0 20.0 50.0 10.0 2.5 0.97 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 45.5 27.3 18.2 2.5 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 11 27.3 27.3 36.4 9.1 2.3 1.01 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 70.0 30.0 0.0 2.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 70.0 30.0 0.0 2.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 2.6 0.81 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 18.2 54.5 9.1 18.2 2.3 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 18.2 36.4 18.2 27.3 2.5 1.13 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 36.4 18.2 18.2 27.3 2.4 1.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 57.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 003L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 50.0 A 1 25.0 Sophomore 2 50.0 B 3 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 25.0 Studies Program 1 33.3 2 hours 2 50.0 Required by my major 1 33.3 3 hours 1 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 33.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 80.0 0.0 20.0 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 16.7 33.3 16.7 33.3 2.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 30.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 005L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 75.0 A 2 25.0 Sophomore 1 12.5 B 6 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 25.0 Studies Program 7 87.5 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 12.5 25.0 12.5 50.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 25.0 12.5 37.5 25.0 2.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 12.5 12.5 25.0 50.0 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 16.7 16.7 0.0 66.7 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 12.5 0.0 37.5 50.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 25.0 0.0 12.5 62.5 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 006L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 71.4 A 1 7.7 Sophomore 3 21.4 B 9 69.2 Junior 1 7.1 C 2 15.4 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 7.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 12 85.7 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 23.1 46.2 30.8 3.1 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 21.4 42.9 28.6 2.9 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 30.8 61.5 7.7 2.8 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 007L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 50.0 A 3 18.8 Sophomore 4 25.0 B 7 43.8 Junior 1 6.3 C 6 37.5 Senior 3 18.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 37.5 Studies Program 14 87.5 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 1 6.3 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 5.9 17.6 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 11.8 35.3 47.1 5.9 2.5 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 5.9 29.4 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 29.4 52.9 17.6 2.9 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 5.9 11.8 58.8 23.5 3.0 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 5.9 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 18.8 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 42.9 50.0 7.1 2.6 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 12.5 75.0 6.3 2.8 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 12.5 6.3 75.0 6.3 2.8 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 1.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 9.1 27.3 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 94.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 008L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 44.4 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 4 44.4 B 4 44.4 Junior 1 11.1 C 2 22.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 44.4 Studies Program 7 87.5 2 hours 5 55.6 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 10.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 3.1 1.10 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 20.0 30.0 50.0 3.3 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 11.1 22.2 11.1 55.6 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 10 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.94 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 009L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 83.3 A 1 16.7 Sophomore 1 16.7 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 33.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 16.7 Studies Program 4 66.7 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 57.1 28.6 14.3 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 38.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 010L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 50.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 2 33.3 B 2 33.3 Junior 1 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 16.7 Studies Program 5 83.3 2 hours 2 33.3 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 14.3 0.0 14.3 71.4 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 28.6 14.3 28.6 28.6 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 36.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 011L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowman, Shearer Davis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 66.7 A 4 44.4 Sophomore 2 22.2 B 5 55.6 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 44.4 Studies Program 8 88.9 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 1 11.1 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 33.3 22.2 44.4 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 47.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 240 001L1 HISTORY OF KENTUCKY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Campbell, Tracy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 61.9 Sophomore 1 4.5 B 7 33.3 Junior 5 22.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 16 72.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 33.3 Studies Program 1 4.8 2 hours 10 47.6 Required by my major 11 52.4 3 hours 2 9.5 Other (e.g. elective) 9 42.9 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 4.0 24.0 72.0 3.7 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 67.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 207 001L1 HIS OF MODERN LATIN AMERICA, 1810 TO PRESENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chassen-Lopez, Francie R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 26.7 A 15 50.0 Sophomore 1 3.3 B 13 43.3 Junior 13 43.3 C 2 6.7 Senior 8 26.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 43.3 Studies Program 9 29.0 2 hours 8 26.7 Required by my major 12 38.7 3 hours 6 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 32.3 4 - 5 hours 3 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 0.0 60.6 39.4 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 9.4 40.6 50.0 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 3.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 3.0 3.0 48.5 45.5 3.4 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 3.0 54.5 42.4 3.4 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 6.3 59.4 34.4 3.3 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 3.2 19.4 48.4 29.0 3.0 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 6.1 6.1 57.6 30.3 3.1 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 6.1 51.5 42.4 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 3.0 3.0 48.5 45.5 3.4 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 3.0 3.0 39.4 54.5 3.5 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 3.0 39.4 57.6 3.5 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 9.7 48.4 41.9 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 17.2 48.3 34.5 3.2 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 3.0 9.1 42.4 45.5 3.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 3.0 0.0 45.5 51.5 3.5 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 3.0 6.1 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 11.1 0.0 66.7 22.2 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 107 002L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 50.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 1 16.7 B 3 60.0 Junior 1 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 50.0 Studies Program 5 83.3 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 107 004L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 41.7 A 3 27.3 Sophomore 2 16.7 B 7 63.6 Junior 3 25.0 C 1 9.1 Senior 2 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 16.7 Studies Program 10 83.3 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 2 16.7 3 hours 7 58.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 20.0 66.7 6.7 2.7 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 20.0 33.3 46.7 3.3 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 107 005L1 WEST CULT: SCI & TECH II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 14.3 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 5 35.7 B 8 57.1 Junior 4 28.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 21.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 57.1 Studies Program 10 71.4 2 hours 6 42.9 Required by my major 3 21.4 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 35.3 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 27.8 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 0.0 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 11.1 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 17.6 11.8 52.9 17.6 2.7 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 22.2 38.9 38.9 3.2 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 584 001L1 HEALTH & DISEASE IN U.S. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 45.0 Sophomore 3 13.6 B 10 50.0 Junior 4 18.2 C 1 5.0 Senior 13 59.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 9.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 14.3 Studies Program 7 33.3 2 hours 5 23.8 Required by my major 6 28.6 3 hours 3 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 38.1 4 - 5 hours 7 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 9.5 8 or more hours 1 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 3.7 59.3 37.0 3.3 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 7.4 55.6 37.0 3.3 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 15.4 42.3 42.3 3.3 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 3.7 3.7 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 14.8 40.7 44.4 3.3 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 7.4 63.0 29.6 3.2 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 0.0 70.8 29.2 3.3 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 3.7 3.7 29.6 63.0 3.5 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 87.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 615 001S1 HIS SCI & MED THRU RENAI INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eastwood, Bruce S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 71.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 42.9 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 4 57.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 579 001L1 HISTORY OF THE NEW SOUTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eller, Ronald D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 46.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 38.5 Junior 1 7.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 53.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 38.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 15.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 15.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 23.1 Required by my major 5 38.5 3 hours 7 53.8 Other (e.g. elective) 8 61.5 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 60.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 712 001S1 SEM AMER HIS 1865-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Eller, Ronald D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 25.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 75.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 6 100.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 526 001L1 EURO SINCE WORLD WAR II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Furlough, Ellen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 38.1 Sophomore 1 4.8 B 11 52.4 Junior 4 19.0 C 1 4.8 Senior 8 38.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 38.1 E/Fail 1 4.8 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 28.6 Required by my major 13 61.9 3 hours 9 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 8 38.1 4 - 5 hours 5 23.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 13.6 31.8 54.5 3.4 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 9.1 22.7 27.3 40.9 3.0 1.02 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 4.8 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 0.0 33.3 61.9 3.5 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 9.1 9.1 31.8 50.0 3.2 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 230 001L1 HELLENISTIC WORLD & ROME TO DEATH OF CONSTANTINE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gargola, ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.0 A 14 70.0 Sophomore 7 35.0 B 5 25.0 Junior 5 25.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 6 30.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 25.0 Studies Program 11 55.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 5 25.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 20.0 4 - 5 hours 4 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 26.1 69.6 3.7 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 23.8 71.4 3.7 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 26.1 69.6 3.7 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 27.3 36.4 36.4 3.1 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 8.7 21.7 69.6 3.6 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 67.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 712 002S1 SEM AMER HIS 1865-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = HAMILTON, DAVID E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 50.0 8 or more hours 1 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 80.0 0.0 20.0 2.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 55.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 002L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harling, Philip R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 29.4 A 8 50.0 Sophomore 10 58.8 B 7 43.8 Junior 1 5.9 C 1 6.3 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 6 35.3 2 hours 3 18.8 Required by my major 9 52.9 3 hours 6 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 18.2 27.3 36.4 18.2 2.5 1.04 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 5.9 23.5 52.9 17.6 2.8 0.81 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 44.4 33.3 16.7 2.6 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 003L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harling, Philip R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 18.8 A 9 56.3 Sophomore 8 50.0 B 6 37.5 Junior 5 31.3 C 1 6.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 2 13.3 2 hours 7 43.8 Required by my major 12 80.0 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 23.1 46.2 23.1 2.8 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 12.5 31.3 50.0 3.3 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 2.8 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 18.8 37.5 43.8 3.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 18.8 18.8 62.5 3.4 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 004L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harling, Philip R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 27.3 A 7 63.6 Sophomore 5 45.5 B 4 36.4 Junior 2 18.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 6 54.5 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 4 36.4 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 37.5 0.0 50.0 12.5 2.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 9 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 005L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harling, Philip R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 50.0 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 5 35.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 14.3 Senior 3 21.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 14.3 Studies Program 8 57.1 2 hours 8 57.1 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 1 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 4 28.6 4 - 5 hours 3 21.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 20.0 10.0 60.0 10.0 2.6 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 38.5 53.8 7.7 2.7 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 105 007L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harling, Philip R. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 70.0 A 2 20.0 Sophomore 2 20.0 B 8 80.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 30.0 Studies Program 6 60.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 58.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 109 201L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hodges, Robert C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 55.6 A 3 30.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 60.0 Junior 1 11.1 C 1 10.0 Senior 3 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 9 90.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 11.1 11.1 66.7 11.1 2.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.94 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 27.3 36.4 27.3 2.8 0.98. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 45.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 500 001L1 PRE-CLASSICAL & CLASS GR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holle, Bruce F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 52.9 Junior 5 29.4 C 2 11.8 Senior 10 58.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 11.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 13 76.5 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 23.5 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 68.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 001L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 82.4 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 56.3 Junior 2 11.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 68.8 Studies Program 12 70.6 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 4 23.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 26.3 57.9 10.5 2.7 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 83.3 5.6 2.9 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 10.5 63.2 21.1 3.0 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 68.4 15.8 3.0 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 19 26.3 42.1 31.6 0.0 2.1 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 22.2 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 16.7 77.8 5.6 2.9 0.47 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 15.8 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 0.34 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 0.34 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 002L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 75.0 A 1 25.0 Sophomore 1 25.0 B 2 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 25.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 25.0 Studies Program 4 100.0 2 hours 1 25.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 2.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 25.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 003L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 92.3 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 4 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 8.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 30.8 Studies Program 13 100.0 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 15.8 78.9 3.7 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 21.1 15.8 63.2 3.4 0.84 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 21.1 73.7 3.7 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 10.5 26.3 57.9 3.4 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 17 11.8 23.5 35.3 29.4 2.8 1.01 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 26.3 31.6 31.6 2.8 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 11.1 27.8 61.1 3.5 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 004L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 50.0 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 5 41.7 B 5 41.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 25.0 Studies Program 10 90.9 2 hours 6 50.0 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 15.4 7.7 46.2 30.8 2.9 1.04 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 12 16.7 50.0 16.7 16.7 2.3 0.98 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.81 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 65.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 005L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 66.7 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 1 16.7 C 1 14.3 Senior 1 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 3 42.9 2 hours 3 42.9 Required by my major 3 42.9 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 40.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 006L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 66.7 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 3 33.3 B 4 44.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 7 77.8 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 1 11.1 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 10 10.0 70.0 0.0 20.0 2.3 0.95 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 54.5 45.5 0.0 2.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 55.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 007L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 83.3 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 1 16.7 B 4 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 33.3 Studies Program 5 83.3 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 4 66.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 41.7 33.3 25.0 2.8 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 54.5 27.3 18.2 2.6 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 008L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 50.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 3 50.0 B 4 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 83.3 2 hours 5 83.3 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 12.5 12.5 62.5 12.5 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 16.7 50.0 33.3 0.0 2.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 12.5 0.0 87.5 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 40.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 009L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 61.5 A 7 53.8 Sophomore 2 15.4 B 6 46.2 Junior 3 23.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 38.5 Studies Program 11 84.6 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 1 7.7 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 12.5 12.5 62.5 12.5 2.8 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 6.3 12.5 62.5 18.8 2.9 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 18.8 25.0 56.3 3.4 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 42.9 35.7 21.4 2.8 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 6.3 6.3 56.3 31.3 3.1 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 28.6 42.9 21.4 2.8 0.89 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 6.3 0.0 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 31.3 50.0 18.8 2.9 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 12.5 18.8 68.8 3.6 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 6.7 0.0 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.80 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 010L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 100.0 A 1 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 66.7 Studies Program 2 66.7 2 hours 1 33.3 Required by my major 1 33.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 25.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 013L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 62.5 A 3 20.0 Sophomore 5 31.3 B 10 66.7 Junior 1 6.3 C 2 13.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 53.3 Studies Program 14 87.5 2 hours 4 26.7 Required by my major 1 6.3 3 hours 2 13.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 26.3 52.6 15.8 2.8 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 21.1 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 5.6 5.6 61.1 27.8 3.1 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 18 16.7 22.2 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.92 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 5.6 22.2 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 10.5 63.2 21.1 3.0 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 31.6 42.1 21.1 2.8 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 15.8 5.3 63.2 15.8 2.8 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 15.8 42.1 36.8 3.1 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 30.8 61.5 0.0 2.5 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 014L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 64.3 A 3 21.4 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 10 71.4 Junior 1 7.1 C 1 7.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 57.1 Studies Program 10 71.4 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 3 21.4 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 11.1 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 5.9 17.6 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 23.5 64.7 11.8 2.9 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 3.2 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 11.1 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 38.9 55.6 5.6 2.7 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 29.4 52.9 11.8 2.7 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 27.8 44.4 27.8 3.0 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 015L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 54.5 A 5 45.5 Sophomore 3 27.3 B 6 54.5 Junior 1 9.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 45.5 Studies Program 10 90.9 2 hours 4 36.4 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 35.3 41.2 23.5 2.9 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 29.4 35.3 35.3 3.1 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 016L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 80.0 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 2 20.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 22.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 60.0 Studies Program 10 100.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 13.3 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 33.3 40.0 26.7 2.9 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 46.2 38.5 7.7 2.5 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 26.7 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 20.0 73.3 3.7 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 017L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 86.7 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 1 6.7 B 6 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 18.8 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 15 93.8 2 hours 8 50.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 5.3 5.3 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.81 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 10.5 10.5 63.2 15.8 2.8 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 21.1 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 31.6 57.9 10.5 2.8 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 27.8 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 21.1 63.2 10.5 2.8 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 19 21.1 42.1 31.6 5.3 2.2 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 5.9 23.5 58.8 11.8 2.8 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 5.9 17.6 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 41.2 47.1 5.9 2.5 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 0.0 73.7 21.1 3.1 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 42.1 36.8 10.5 2.5 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 6.7 20.0 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 018L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 16 80.0 A 11 55.0 Sophomore 1 5.0 B 9 45.0 Junior 3 15.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 40.0 Studies Program 14 77.8 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 2 11.1 3 hours 5 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 4.8 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 9.5 9.5 52.4 28.6 3.0 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 14.3 9.5 47.6 28.6 2.9 1.00 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 10.0 55.0 30.0 3.1 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 14.3 42.9 38.1 3.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 10.5 42.1 42.1 3.2 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 95.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 019L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 70.0 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 2 20.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 40.0 Studies Program 9 90.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 1 10.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 13.3 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 12.5 6.3 56.3 25.0 2.9 0.93 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 6.3 0.0 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 6.3 25.0 25.0 43.8 3.1 1.00 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 1.03 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 12.5 12.5 43.8 31.3 2.9 1.00 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 6.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 6.3 0.0 62.5 31.3 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 6.3 0.0 31.3 62.5 3.5 0.82 11. Was available for consultation 16 12.5 0.0 62.5 25.0 3.0 0.89 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 6.3 6.3 56.3 31.3 3.1 0.81 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 12.5 43.8 37.5 3.1 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 16 12.5 18.8 43.8 25.0 2.8 0.98 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 6.7 0.0 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 6.3 18.8 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.85 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 21.4 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 6.3 0.0 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 26.7 53.3 13.3 2.7 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 0.0 62.5 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 8.3 16.7 25.0 50.0 3.2 1.03 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 020L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 81.3 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 2 12.5 B 10 62.5 Junior 1 6.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 6.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 37.5 Studies Program 15 93.8 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 1 6.3 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 10.0 30.0 45.0 15.0 2.7 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 20.0 60.0 15.0 2.9 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 5.0 20.0 65.0 10.0 2.8 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 15.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 25.0 60.0 15.0 2.9 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 10.0 15.0 60.0 15.0 2.8 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 19 21.1 31.6 42.1 5.3 2.3 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 10.0 15.0 65.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 10.0 75.0 10.0 2.9 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 30.0 55.0 10.0 2.7 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 5.0 10.0 65.0 20.0 3.0 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 25.0 55.0 15.0 2.8 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 2.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 2.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 50.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 573 001L1 AMER CONSTITUTIONAL HIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ireland, Robert M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 45.7 Sophomore 3 8.3 B 13 37.1 Junior 18 50.0 C 5 14.3 Senior 12 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 5.6 Pass or Audit 1 2.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 17.1 Studies Program 5 13.9 2 hours 8 22.9 Required by my major 16 44.4 3 hours 8 22.9 Other (e.g. elective) 15 41.7 4 - 5 hours 6 17.1 6 - 7 hours 3 8.6 8 or more hours 4 11.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 28.2 71.8 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 3.1 37.5 59.4 3.6 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 0.0 21.6 78.4 3.8 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 7.9 31.6 60.5 3.5 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 0.0 5.1 38.5 56.4 3.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 0.0 2.6 21.1 76.3 3.7 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 0.0 7.9 42.1 50.0 3.4 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 2.6 25.6 71.8 3.7 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 2.9 41.2 55.9 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 2.6 28.2 69.2 3.7 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 0.0 12.8 15.4 71.8 3.6 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 39 2.6 2.6 17.9 76.9 3.7 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 8.8 47.1 44.1 3.4 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 2.6 39.5 57.9 3.6 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 8.6 40.0 51.4 3.4 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 2.6 36.8 60.5 3.6 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 13.5 32.4 54.1 3.4 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 0.0 7.9 34.2 57.9 3.5 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 10.8 13.5 75.7 3.6 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 69 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 56.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 650 002S1 RDGS SPEC TOPS HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kern, Kathi ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 33.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 66.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 4 66.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 33.3 50.0 0.0 16.7 2.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 33.3 16.7 16.7 33.3 2.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 105 401L1 HIS EUR MID 17 CENT-PRES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = King, David V ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 26.3 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 4 21.1 B 9 47.4 Junior 3 15.8 C 3 15.8 Senior 5 26.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 10.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 36.8 Studies Program 8 42.1 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 7 36.8 3 hours 6 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 21.1 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 0.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 5.0 65.0 15.0 15.0 2.4 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 2.9 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 30.0 55.0 15.0 2.9 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 401L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Mcintire, Anthony A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 55.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 5 25.0 B 8 42.1 Junior 2 10.0 C 4 21.1 Senior 2 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 30.0 Studies Program 17 89.5 2 hours 10 50.0 Required by my major 2 10.5 3 hours 3 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 4.3 8.7 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 4.5 4.5 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 4.5 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 15.8 10.5 47.4 26.3 2.8 1.01 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 22.7 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 4.5 9.1 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 13.6 22.7 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 23.8 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 14.3 61.9 23.8 3.1 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 45.5 27.3 13.6 2.4 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 9.5 28.6 38.1 23.8 2.8 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 9.5 33.3 33.3 23.8 2.7 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 33.3 22.2 44.4 0.0 2.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 316 003S1 JR SEM: HIS METHOD & LIT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 45.5 Sophomore 1 9.1 B 6 54.5 Junior 8 72.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 18.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 18.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 20.0 30.0 50.0 3.3 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 18.2 18.2 63.6 3.5 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 462 001L1 NEW REPUBLIC, 1789-1820 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 60.0 Sophomore 1 4.0 B 10 40.0 Junior 7 28.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 17 68.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 24.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 32.0 Required by my major 19 76.0 3 hours 5 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 24.0 4 - 5 hours 6 24.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 0.0 20.7 79.3 3.8 0.41 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 0.0 27.6 72.4 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.9 0.31 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 0.0 13.8 86.2 3.9 0.35 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 3.4 37.9 58.6 3.6 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 0.0 17.2 82.8 3.8 0.38 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 10.3 89.7 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 0.0 17.2 82.8 3.8 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 0.0 20.7 79.3 3.8 0.41 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 17.2 82.8 3.8 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 3.6 14.3 82.1 3.8 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 3.4 10.3 27.6 58.6 3.4 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 0.0 20.7 79.3 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 0.0 6.9 93.1 3.9 0.26. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 69.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 568 001L1 NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORY: THE EAST INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nichols, David A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 25.0 Junior 2 13.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 6.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 46.7 Required by my major 14 93.3 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 2 13.3 6 - 7 hours 2 13.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 58.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 546 001L1 THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Olster, D M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 58.8 Sophomore 2 11.8 B 6 35.3 Junior 4 23.5 C 1 5.9 Senior 9 52.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 11.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 13 76.5 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 17.6 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 3 17.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 5.3 0.0 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.76 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 0.0 42.1 52.6 3.4 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 0.0 61.1 33.3 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 11.1 0.0 44.4 44.4 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 0.0 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 10.5 52.6 31.6 3.1 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 5.3 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.81 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 0.0 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 10.5 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 5.3 31.6 57.9 3.4 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 6.7 20.0 33.3 40.0 3.1 0.96 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 11.1 38.9 44.4 3.2 0.88 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 15.8 42.1 36.8 3.1 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 5.3 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 21.1 73.7 3.7 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 286 001L1 HIS OF RUSSIA SINCE 1825 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.6 A 5 27.8 Sophomore 6 33.3 B 13 72.2 Junior 5 27.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 27.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 2 11.1 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 11 61.1 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 27.8 4 - 5 hours 6 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 20.0 75.0 3.7 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 15.0 50.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 5.0 5.0 90.0 3.9 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 15.8 78.9 3.7 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 3.8 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 15.0 5.0 75.0 3.5 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 3.8 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 535 001L1 RUSSIA IN 20TH CENTURY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.3 A 4 26.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 66.7 Junior 3 18.8 C 1 6.7 Senior 11 68.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 6.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 12.5 Required by my major 12 75.0 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 25.0 4 - 5 hours 6 37.5 6 - 7 hours 2 12.5 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 22.2 72.2 3.7 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 11.1 16.7 72.2 3.6 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 16.7 22.2 61.1 3.4 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 650 004S1 RDGS SPEC TOPS HISTORY: MODERN RUSSIAN HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Petrone, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 87.5 E/Fail 1 12.5 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 62.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 37.5 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 2 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 14.3 0.0 14.3 71.4 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 595 001L1 STUDIES IN HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pringle, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 1 5.6 B 10 55.6 Junior 4 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 27.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 38.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.6 Pass or Audit 1 5.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 16.7 Required by my major 6 33.3 3 hours 7 38.9 Other (e.g. elective) 12 66.7 4 - 5 hours 4 22.2 6 - 7 hours 3 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 470 001L1 HONORS SEM HISTORICAL METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rowland, Daniel B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 35.7 Junior 4 28.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 71.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 12 85.7 3 hours 6 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 2 14.3 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 0.0 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 0.0 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 75.0 3.7 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 93.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 460 001L1 COLONIAL AMERICA TO 1763 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Smith, Daniel B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 40.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 45.5 Junior 4 18.2 C 3 13.6 Senior 18 81.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 50.0 Required by my major 17 77.3 3 hours 6 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 22.7 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 12.5 58.3 29.2 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 77.3 18.2 3.1 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 16.7 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 30.4 60.9 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 63.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 630 001S1 RDGS AMER HIS: COLON ERA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Smith, Daniel B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 316 001S1 JR SEM: HIS METHOD & LIT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Smith, Gerald L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 14.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 3 42.9 C 2 28.6 Senior 4 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 46.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 109 025L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 73 59.8 A 29 24.2 Sophomore 36 29.5 B 70 58.3 Junior 9 7.4 C 19 15.8 Senior 3 2.5 D 2 1.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 36 29.5 Studies Program 99 81.8 2 hours 44 36.1 Required by my major 16 13.2 3 hours 21 17.2 Other (e.g. elective) 6 5.0 4 - 5 hours 15 12.3 6 - 7 hours 6 4.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 132 0.8 0.0 52.3 47.0 3.5 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 130 0.8 4.6 52.3 42.3 3.4 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 132 2.3 11.4 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 132 0.0 5.3 50.0 44.7 3.4 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 131 6.9 14.5 44.3 34.4 3.1 0.87 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 131 0.8 13.0 51.9 34.4 3.2 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 130 7.7 30.8 36.9 24.6 2.8 0.91 8. Graded assignments included comments 131 2.3 10.7 49.6 37.4 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 131 0.0 6.1 28.2 65.6 3.6 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 132 0.8 1.5 14.4 83.3 3.8 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 109 0.0 6.4 42.2 51.4 3.4 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 124 0.8 2.4 44.4 52.4 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 130 0.8 5.4 31.5 62.3 3.6 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 119 4.2 18.5 36.1 41.2 3.1 0.87 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 117 1.7 6.8 58.1 33.3 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 119 1.7 9.2 58.0 31.1 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 104 1.9 18.3 51.0 28.8 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 125 1.6 4.0 53.6 40.8 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 127 4.7 18.9 43.3 33.1 3.0 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 128 0.0 13.3 39.8 46.9 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 129 0.8 7.0 10.9 81.4 3.7 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 43 2.3 18.6 51.2 27.9 3.0 0.75 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 62 1.6 16.1 50.0 32.3 3.1 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 69 2.9 8.7 50.7 37.7 3.2 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 27 3.7 14.8 55.6 25.9 3.0 0.76 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 26 3.8 7.7 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.73 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 23 8.7 34.8 43.5 13.0 2.6 0.84 33. Amount of work appropriate 24 0.0 12.5 70.8 16.7 3.0 0.55 34. Instructor explained expectations 24 20.8 16.7 45.8 16.7 2.6 1.02 35. Instructor helped with my problems 23 13.0 21.7 43.5 21.7 2.7 0.96 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 14 21.4 14.3 50.0 14.3 2.6 1.02 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 288 Number of forms scanned = 135 Number of forms with at least one student response = 133 Percent completed = 46.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 465 001L1 EMER OF MOD AM 1877-1917 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Summers, Mark W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 45.2 Sophomore 3 7.1 B 19 45.2 Junior 17 40.5 C 2 4.8 Senior 18 42.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 9.5 Pass or Audit 2 4.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 12.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 41.5 Required by my major 30 71.4 3 hours 16 39.0 Other (e.g. elective) 12 28.6 4 - 5 hours 3 7.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 43 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 43 0.0 0.0 37.2 62.8 3.6 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 0.0 40.5 59.5 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 2.4 9.8 43.9 43.9 3.3 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 41 0.0 0.0 34.1 65.9 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 0.0 2.3 23.3 74.4 3.7 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 43 0.0 0.0 9.3 90.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 42 0.0 0.0 26.2 73.8 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 0.0 4.7 23.3 72.1 3.7 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 42 0.0 7.1 33.3 59.5 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 0.0 5.1 48.7 46.2 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 0.0 2.4 38.1 59.5 3.6 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 0.0 7.1 38.1 54.8 3.5 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 0.0 2.3 23.3 74.4 3.7 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 43 0.0 0.0 7.0 93.0 3.9 0.26. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 43 Percent completed = 72.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 001L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 41.2 A 7 41.2 Sophomore 8 47.1 B 7 41.2 Junior 1 5.9 C 3 17.6 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 35.3 Studies Program 9 52.9 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 5 29.4 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 17.6 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 47.1 35.3 17.6 2.7 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 5.9 41.2 35.3 17.6 2.6 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 14 14.3 50.0 21.4 14.3 2.4 0.93 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 17.6 58.8 23.5 3.1 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 33.3 41.7 25.0 2.9 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 17.6 35.3 29.4 17.6 2.5 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 41.2 35.3 23.5 2.8 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 23.5 17.6 29.4 29.4 2.6 1.17. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 28.6 14.3 28.6 28.6 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 104 002L1 HIS EUR THRU MID-17 CENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 62.5 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 2 12.5 B 8 50.0 Junior 2 12.5 C 1 6.3 Senior 1 6.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 11 68.8 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 5 31.3 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 31.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 5.0 15.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 25.0 45.0 25.0 2.9 0.85 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 20.0 45.0 35.0 3.2 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 5.3 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 10.5 63.2 21.1 3.0 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 25.0 15.0 30.0 30.0 2.7 1.18 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 14 7.1 14.3 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.92 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 20.0 25.0 25.0 30.0 2.7 1.14 14. Encouraged class participation 17 29.4 29.4 23.5 17.6 2.3 1.10 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 5.9 29.4 41.2 23.5 2.8 0.88 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 16.7 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 6.7 40.0 40.0 13.3 2.6 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 16.7 22.2 44.4 16.7 2.6 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 10.5 15.8 52.6 21.1 2.8 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 10.5 36.8 21.1 31.6 2.7 1.05. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.92 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 8.3 0.0 75.0 16.7 3.0 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 271 001L1 LATER MIDDLE AGES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 16.7 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 5 27.8 B 10 55.6 Junior 5 27.8 C 1 5.6 Senior 4 22.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 22.2 Studies Program 5 29.4 2 hours 3 16.7 Required by my major 6 35.3 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 35.3 4 - 5 hours 5 27.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 5.3 5.3 89.5 3.8 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 5.9 0.0 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 11.8 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 20.0 30.0 45.0 3.2 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 15.0 45.0 40.0 3.3 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 46.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 511 001L1 MEDIEVAL CIVILIZATION II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Taylor, Nathaniel Lane ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 53.3 Junior 2 13.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 20.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.7 Pass or Audit 1 6.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 26.7 Required by my major 8 53.3 3 hours 6 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 46.7 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 64.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 316 002S1 JR SEM: HIS METHOD & LIT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whitlock, Tammy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 10.0 Junior 4 40.0 C 2 20.0 Senior 6 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 3 hours 5 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 2 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 11.1 33.3 33.3 22.2 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 0.0 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 30.0 50.0 3.3 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 68.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2001 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 554 001L1 BRITISH HIST 1815-1901 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Whitlock, Tammy ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 54.5 Sophomore 1 4.8 B 9 40.9 Junior 5 23.8 C 1 4.5 Senior 14 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 13.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 9.1 Required by my major 15 71.4 3 hours 14 63.6 Other (e.g. elective) 6 28.6 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 18.2 36.4 40.9 3.1 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 43.8 31.3 3.1 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 23.8 28.6 42.9 3.1 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 9.1 31.8 59.1 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 68.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************