|
By
George
Lewis

To
read the draft policy and comment on it, go to www.uky.edu/FAIT/SRA.
The task force will accept comments through Monday,
Dec. 9.
|
Lexington,
Ky. (Dec. 3, 2002) -- A
University of Kentucky Presidential task force is
seeking comments from members of the campus community
regarding a policy that will act as a guide for determining
and implementing procedures affecting computer security
and resource allocation at UK. To read the draft policy
and comment on it, go to www.uky.edu/FAIT/SRA.
The task force will accept comments through Monday,
Dec. 9.
"We
have a serious and growing security threat, almost
all of which originates outside the University,"
said Bob Tannenbaum, chairman of the Task Force on
Computer Security and Resource Allocation, which UK
President Lee T. Todd Jr. formed in June.
Tannenbaum
said incidents of computer-security breaches are reported
each week at the university. Generally, he said, these
result in virus- or Trojan-infected computers on campus
networks. The compromised computers are discovered
attacking other computers, advertising storage space
for hijackers, or scanning UK networks for information
on networked resources, he said.
"We
need to take protective action of various kinds,"
Tannenbaum said. "The policy, when approved,
will serve as a guide for the university's information
technology professionals as they respond to these
security problems."
Regarding
resource allocation issues, Tannenbaum said, "A
considerable volume of our Internet bandwidth is being
taken up by peer-to-peer file exchange traffic. At
times, this has consumed more than half of the bandwidth
we have available."
But regulating
exchanges such as these is not simple, as the task
force members learned while attempting to set forth
principles that balance the rights and privacy of
individual users with the responsibilities of the
university to provide resources in support of its
educational, research and service mission. Also at
issue are technological, security and legal problems
posed by certain uses and misuses of network, storage
and computing resources.
The draft
policy contains a clearly delineated appeals process
to be followed by members of the university community
who feel negatively affected by actions taken by the
university under the policy and resulting guidelines.
|