Teaching Evaluations Fall 1995

Introduction to Morality and Society (2 sections) LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1995 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 006L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.0 A 7 35.0 Sophomore 8 40.0 B 12 60.0 Junior 6 30.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 3 15.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 5.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.0 Studies Program 15 75.0 2 hours 8 40.0 Required by my major 4 20.0 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 4 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 70.8 29.2 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 29.2 70.8 0.0 2.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 13.0 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 17.4 34.8 47.8 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 39.1 43.5 17.4 2.8 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall quality of the course 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.71 Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1995 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 007L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 47.4 A 4 21.1 Sophomore 5 26.3 B 12 63.2 Junior 4 21.1 C 3 15.8 Senior 1 5.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 21.1 Studies Program 15 78.9 2 hours 3 15.8 Required by my major 1 5.3 3 hours 6 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 4 21.1 6 - 7 hours 2 10.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 9.5 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 23.8 52.4 23.8 3.0 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 5.0 40.0 55.0 0.0 2.5 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 38.1 47.6 14.3 2.8 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 19.0 38.1 42.9 3.2 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 21.1 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 33.3 33.3 28.6 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall quality of the course 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67

1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1995 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 401L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.3 A 2 12.5 Sophomore 2 12.5 B 14 87.5 Junior 6 37.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 43.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 7 43.8 Required by my major 1 6.7 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 20.0 4 - 5 hours 5 31.3 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 27.8 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 11.8 17.6 52.9 17.6 2.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall quality of the course 17 5.9 5.9 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18