INTRODUCTION TO KNOWLEDGE AND REALITY
1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 100 001L1 INTRO PHI:KNOWL/REALITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 54.5 A 4 18.2 Sophomore 8 36.4 B 16 72.7 Junior 1 4.5 C 2 9.1 Senior 1 4.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 31.8 Studies Program 14 66.7 2 hours 9 40.9 Required by my major 3 14.3 3 hours 4 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 4 19.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 0.0 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 0.0 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 12.5 33.3 54.2 3.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 17.4 56.5 26.1 3.1 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 36.4 40.9 18.2 2.7 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 4.2 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 4.3 13.0 82.6 3.8 0.52 Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 77.4 % 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 100 003L1 INTRO PHI:KNOWL/REALITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 60.0 A 5 20.0 Sophomore 7 28.0 B 18 72.0 Junior 2 8.0 C 2 8.0 Senior 1 4.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 32.0 Studies Program 13 54.2 2 hours 5 20.0 Required by my major 3 12.5 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 33.3 4 - 5 hours 4 16.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 3.7 66.7 29.6 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 7.4 44.4 48.1 3.4 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 7.4 63.0 29.6 3.2 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 14.8 85.2 3.9 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 14.8 44.4 40.7 3.3 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 3.7 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 3.7 37.0 37.0 22.2 2.8 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 87.1 %
PHILOSOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS IN KNOWLEDGE AND REALITY:
PERSONAL IDENTITY
1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 550 001L1 PHI PROBS KNOWL/REALITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 1 20.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 20.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 20.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 %