1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT                                         Page 1
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS
COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences                DEPARTMENT = Philosophy
FACULTY TYPE = Faculty
COURSE = PHI 100 006L1   INTRO PHI:KNOWL/REALITY
INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian

                            SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION

Classification    Number    Percent           Expected grade      Number    Percent
Freshman              13      72.2             A                       6      35.3
Sophomore              2      11.1             B                      11      64.7
Junior                 2      11.1             C                       0       0.0
Senior                 1       5.6             D                       0       0.0
Graduate               0       0.0             E/Fail                  0       0.0
Professional           0       0.0             I                       0       0.0
Other                  0       0.0             Pass or Audit           0       0.0

Reason for taking course    Number    Percent         Hrs/week spent    Number    Percent
Required by University                                1 hour or less         3      16.7
    Studies Program              12      70.6          2 hours               10      55.6
Required by my major             2      11.8          3 hours                4      22.2
Other (e.g. elective)            3      17.6          4 - 5 hours            0       0.0
                                                       6 - 7 hours            1       5.6
                                                       8 or more hours        0       0.0

                                                  %                      %   
                                              Strongly     %      %   Strongly
                                           N  Disagree Disagree Agree  Agree   Mean  SD
                                                  (1)     (2)    (3)    (4)
SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS
1. Outlined course material and grading     21    0.0    0.0   42.9   57.1    3.6  0.51
2. Textbook contributed to understandin     20    0.0   10.0   60.0   30.0    3.2  0.62
3. Suppl read & assign helped understan     20    0.0    5.0   55.0   40.0    3.4  0.59
4. Exams reflected what was taught          21    0.0    4.8   47.6   47.6    3.4  0.60
5. Grading was fair and consistent          21    0.0    4.8   66.7   28.6    3.2  0.54
6. Assignments were distributed evenly      19    0.0    5.3   42.1   52.6    3.5  0.61
7. Graded assignments returned promptly     20    5.0    0.0   55.0   40.0    3.3  0.73
8. Graded assignments included comments     19    0.0    5.3   42.1   52.6    3.5  0.61

SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS
9. Presented material effectively           21    0.0    4.8   28.6   66.7    3.6  0.59
10. Had good knowledge of subject matte     21    0.0    0.0   19.0   81.0    3.8  0.40
11. Was available for consultation          20    0.0    0.0   45.0   55.0    3.6  0.51
12. Satisfact answered class questions      21    0.0    0.0   38.1   61.9    3.6  0.50
13. Stimulated interest of the subject      21    4.8    4.8   23.8   66.7    3.5  0.81
14. Encouraged class participation          21    0.0    0.0   28.6   71.4    3.7  0.46

SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES
15. Learned respect different viewpoint     20    0.0    0.0   35.0   65.0    3.7  0.49
16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate       20    0.0    0.0   40.0   60.0    3.6  0.50
17. Course helped abil to solve problem     18    5.6    5.6   61.1   27.8    3.1  0.76
18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin.     20    0.0    0.0   45.0   55.0    3.6  0.51
19. Course stimulated me to read furthe     21    9.5    9.5   57.1   23.8    3.0  0.86


                                                    %      %      %      %   
                                           N      Poor   Fair   Good Excellent Mean  SD
                                                   (1)    (2)    (3)    (4)
SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS
20. Overall value of the course             20    0.0   15.0   30.0   55.0    3.4  0.75
21. Overall quality of teaching             20    0.0    5.0   10.0   85.0    3.8  0.52



1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT                                         Page 1
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS
COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences                DEPARTMENT = Philosophy
FACULTY TYPE = Faculty
COURSE = PHI 100 008L1   INTRO PHI:KNOWL/REALITY
INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian

                            SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION

Classification    Number    Percent           Expected grade      Number    Percent
Freshman              15      71.4             A                       5      26.3
Sophomore              4      19.0             B                      11      57.9
Junior                 2       9.5             C                       3      15.8
Senior                 0       0.0             D                       0       0.0
Graduate               0       0.0             E/Fail                  0       0.0
Professional           0       0.0             I                       0       0.0
Other                  0       0.0             Pass or Audit           0       0.0

Reason for taking course    Number    Percent         Hrs/week spent    Number    Percent
Required by University                                1 hour or less         7      33.3
    Studies Program              13      61.9          2 hours                6      28.6
Required by my major             2       9.5          3 hours                2       9.5
Other (e.g. elective)            6      28.6          4 - 5 hours            4      19.0
                                                       6 - 7 hours            2       9.5
                                                       8 or more hours        0       0.0

                                                  %                      %   
                                              Strongly     %      %   Strongly
                                           N  Disagree Disagree Agree  Agree   Mean  SD
                                                  (1)     (2)    (3)    (4)
SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS
1. Outlined course material and grading     21    0.0    0.0   28.6   71.4    3.7  0.46
2. Textbook contributed to understandin     21    4.8    4.8   61.9   28.6    3.1  0.73
3. Suppl read & assign helped understan     21    0.0    9.5   47.6   42.9    3.3  0.66
4. Exams reflected what was taught          21    0.0    9.5   42.9   47.6    3.4  0.67
5. Grading was fair and consistent          21    0.0    0.0   57.1   42.9    3.4  0.51
6. Assignments were distributed evenly      21    0.0    0.0   47.6   52.4    3.5  0.51
7. Graded assignments returned promptly     21    0.0    4.8   57.1   38.1    3.3  0.58
8. Graded assignments included comments     21    0.0   28.6   52.4   19.0    2.9  0.70

SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS
9. Presented material effectively           21    0.0    4.8   47.6   47.6    3.4  0.60
10. Had good knowledge of subject matte     21    0.0    0.0   28.6   71.4    3.7  0.46
11. Was available for consultation          20    0.0    0.0   60.0   40.0    3.4  0.50
12. Satisfact answered class questions      21    0.0    9.5   42.9   47.6    3.4  0.67
13. Stimulated interest of the subject      21    9.5    4.8   47.6   38.1    3.1  0.91
14. Encouraged class participation          20    0.0    5.0   30.0   65.0    3.6  0.60

SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES
15. Learned respect different viewpoint     21    0.0   14.3   42.9   42.9    3.3  0.72
16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate       21    0.0   14.3   42.9   42.9    3.3  0.72
17. Course helped abil to solve problem     15    0.0   20.0   66.7   13.3    2.9  0.59
18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin.     21    0.0    4.8   52.4   42.9    3.4  0.59
19. Course stimulated me to read furthe     21    4.8   23.8   38.1   33.3    3.0  0.89


                                                    %      %      %      %   
                                           N      Poor   Fair   Good Excellent Mean  SD
                                                   (1)    (2)    (3)    (4)
SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS
20. Overall value of the course             21    0.0    9.5   52.4   38.1    3.3  0.64
21. Overall quality of teaching             21    0.0   14.3   38.1   47.6    3.3  0.73


1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT                                         Page 1
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS
COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences                DEPARTMENT = Philosophy
FACULTY TYPE = Faculty
COURSE = PHI 575 001L1   PHILOSOPHY OF MIND
INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Perring, Christian

                            SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION

Classification    Number    Percent           Expected grade      Number    Percent
Freshman               0       0.0             A                       5      45.5
Sophomore              2      18.2             B                       5      45.5
Junior                 1       9.1             C                       1       9.1
Senior                 5      45.5             D                       0       0.0
Graduate               3      27.3             E/Fail                  0       0.0
Professional           0       0.0             I                       0       0.0
Other                  0       0.0             Pass or Audit           0       0.0

Reason for taking course    Number    Percent         Hrs/week spent    Number    Percent
Required by University                                1 hour or less         1       9.1
    Studies Program               0       0.0          2 hours                5      45.5
Required by my major             4      36.4          3 hours                1       9.1
Other (e.g. elective)            7      63.6          4 - 5 hours            1       9.1
                                                       6 - 7 hours            3      27.3
                                                       8 or more hours        0       0.0

                                                  %                      %   
                                              Strongly     %      %   Strongly
                                           N  Disagree Disagree Agree  Agree   Mean  SD
                                                  (1)     (2)    (3)    (4)
SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS
1. Outlined course material and grading     11    0.0    0.0   81.8   18.2    3.2  0.40
2. Textbook contributed to understandin     10    0.0   10.0   90.0    0.0    2.9  0.32
3. Suppl read & assign helped understan     10    0.0    0.0   90.0   10.0    3.1  0.32
4. Exams reflected what was taught           3    0.0    0.0  100.0    0.0    3.0   . 
5. Grading was fair and consistent          10    0.0    0.0   90.0   10.0    3.1  0.32
6. Assignments were distributed evenly      11    0.0    0.0   72.7   27.3    3.3  0.47
7. Graded assignments returned promptly     10    0.0    0.0   90.0   10.0    3.1  0.32
8. Graded assignments included comments     10    0.0    0.0   50.0   50.0    3.5  0.53

SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS
9. Presented material effectively           11    0.0   18.2   72.7    9.1    2.9  0.54
10. Had good knowledge of subject matte     11    0.0    0.0   54.5   45.5    3.5  0.52
11. Was available for consultation          11    0.0    0.0   54.5   45.5    3.5  0.52
12. Satisfact answered class questions      11    0.0   18.2   63.6   18.2    3.0  0.63
13. Stimulated interest of the subject      11    0.0    0.0   54.5   45.5    3.5  0.52
14. Encouraged class participation          11    0.0    0.0   36.4   63.6    3.6  0.50

SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES
15. Learned respect different viewpoint     11    0.0    0.0   72.7   27.3    3.3  0.47
16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate       10    0.0    0.0   70.0   30.0    3.3  0.48
17. Course helped abil to solve problem      7    0.0   14.3   71.4   14.3    3.0   . 
18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin.     11    0.0    9.1   63.6   27.3    3.2  0.60
19. Course stimulated me to read furthe     11    0.0    0.0   63.6   36.4    3.4  0.50


                                                    %      %      %      %   
                                           N      Poor   Fair   Good Excellent Mean  SD
                                                   (1)    (2)    (3)    (4)
SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS
20. Overall value of the course             11    0.0    0.0   54.5   45.5    3.5  0.52
21. Overall quality of teaching             11    0.0    9.1   63.6   27.3    3.2  0.60