SPRING 20001 THEORY WORKBOOK

Table of Contents


General Contexts

Intrapersonal Communication (Persuasion)

Interpersonal Communication

Small Group Communication

Organizational Communication

Intercultural Communication

Mass Communication
 

Applied Contexts

Health Communication

Instructional Communication
 
 

Honors Capstone Home Page

Last updated February 14, 2001

HONORS:  COMMUNICATION CAPSTONE
SPRING 2001 THEORY WORKBOOK

SMALL GROUP CONTEXT
Click Here to Go Back to Small Group Context Page

FUNCTIONAL PERSPECTIVE 

Explanation of Theory: Functional Perspective claims that there are four functions for effective decision making which include an analysis of the problem, goal setting, identification of alternatives, and an evaluation of positive and negative characteristics, all of which are equally important. 

Theorists: Randy Hirokawa & Dennis Gouran 

Date: 1983

Primary Article: Gouran, Dennis & Hirokawa, R. "The Role of Communication in Decision-Making Groups: A Functional Perspective," in Mary Mander (ed.) Communications in Transition, Praeger, NY, 1983, pp. 168-185.
 

Model: Can be found on page 287 in Theories of Human Communication by Littlejohn 

Individual Interpretations: I believe that this theory is very good in guiding groups through different types of communication. The theory stresses all four functions as being important, which they are.

Metatheoretical Assumptions:

Ontological Assumptions: This theory is very deterministic in that the groups follow a linear pattern along four steps, not necessarily inputing their own thoughts.
 

Epistemological Assumptions: This theory is based on one truth. There is a system that groups will follow
 

Axiological Assumptions: This theory is value-neutral because there is a four- step system that groups follow to rationalize their communication, regardless of their original values.
 

Critique: There are many political and social factors, which are not accounted for in this theory. These will inevitably play a role in group communication, therefore inhibiting the group process. People like to do things the way they always have been (historical function) & a discussion of those who aren¹t present, but are involved (institutional function). 
 

Ideas and Implications:

- By following the four functions, effective decision can be made.

- The functions do not need to be prioritized because they are all important to fulfilling group needs.

- There are some losses due to the process of group decision making. 

- Promotive communication keeps the group moving along, yet some members can be disruptive or even counteractive.

- Most of the research on this theory has been some in a controlled setting. 

Example: When a group gets together in one of the classes here at UK, one of their first assignments is usually to form a peer evaluation form. The process that they go through to determine what is important to them could very easily follow along these four functions so that the group can reach their common goals. 
 
 

Relevant Research:

    Gouran, D., Hirokawa, R., Julian, K., & Leatham, G., "The Evolution & Current Status of the Functional Perspective on Communication in Decision-Making & Problem Solving Groups," in Communication Yearbook, 16, Stanley Deetz (ed.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1993, pp. 573-600.

    Hirokawa, R., "Group Communication & Decision-Making Performance: A Continued Test of the Functional Perspective," Human Communication Research, Vol. 14, 1988, pp. 487-515. 

    Hirokawa, R., "Functional Approaches to the Study of Group Discussion," Small Group Research, Vol. 25, 1994, pp. 542-550. 

    Stohl, C. & Holmes, M. " A Functional Perspective for Bona Fide Groups," Communication Yearbook, 16, 1993, pp. 601-614. 

Other Communication Scholars who have done work on this theory: Dirk Scheerhorn, Cynthia Stohl, Michael Holmes, and Kelly Julian. 
 
 

Location in Eight (8) Primary Communication Theory Textbooks:

    Anderson, R. & Ross, V. (1998). Questions of Communication: A practical introduction to theory (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin¹s Press, not in.
     Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D.C. (1998). Understanding communication theory: The communicative forces for human action. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, p. 227-229

    Griffin, E. (2000). A first look at communication theory (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, p. 211-222.

    Griffin, E. (1997). A first look at communication theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 247-258. 

    Infante, D. A., Rancer, A.S., & Womack, D. F. (1997). Building communication theory (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, not in. 

    Littlejohn, S.W. (1999). Theories of human communication (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, p. 286-287. 

    West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2000). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, not in. 

    Wood, J. T. (1997). Communication theories in action: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, not in.