Laboratory 1 Report Chemosynthesis

Name Section

Hypothesis/ Introduction

Given the conditions of primitive earth, such as a reducing atmosphere, energy from ultraviolet radiation, and the presence of H2, methane, ammonia, water, and formaldehyde simple biological monomers such as amino acids could have been formed. These simple monomers with the addition of heat energy, such as from volcanic activity could then form polymers such as polypeptides.

Data and Observations:

Part A Chromatography Results: If there is no stain there is no R.F. value.

Distance to solvent front from baseline (mm)

Compound

Stain(s) color

Distance migrated(mm)

R.F Value

H2CO3

     

NH4OH

     

Glucose

     

Glycine

     

Aspartic Acid

     

Proline

     

Experimental*

     
       
       
       

* May have more than one amino acid.

B. Polymer Synthesis: Polypeptides

Biuret Test Results

Tube

Observations

Blank

 

Experimental

 

Conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab Report 2 Biochemistry of Milk Parts I &II

Name Section

Introduction (Hypothesis)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data and Observations:

A. Analysis of Fraction 1

Sudan IV Test Results

Tube

Observations

Control H2O

 

Fraction 1

 

Thin Layer Chromatogram Drawing

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biuret Test Results:

Fraction

Blank

F2

F3

F4

F5

Dialysate

Sac

Contents

Color

           

 

 

 

Carbohydrate Analysis

Color

Blank

F2

F3

F4

F5

Dialysate

Sac Contents

Benedicts

           

 

Barfoeds

           

 

 

Chromatography Results:

Distance to solvent Front (mm)

Substance

Distance Migrated(mm)

RF Value

Alanine

   

Aspartic Acid

   

Lysine

   

Proline

   

Histidine

   

Methionie

   

F2 Digest

   

F2 Control

   

F3 Digest

   

F3 Control

   

 

 

 

 

Conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab Report 3 Enzymes and Enzyme Kinetics

Name Section

Hypothesis/Introduction

Amylase is a digestive enzyme that breaks bonds in starch to form glucose. It is found in a wide variety of organisms from bacteria, to humans. Since amylase is protein enzyme it should behave in a predictable way to pH, temperature, enzyme concentration in relation to substrate concentration as other enzymes that are proteins. In addition it should also have an optimal pH and temperature based on its protein properties and the organism that utilizes it.

Data and Observations:

Effects of Enzyme Concentration

Concentration

Time to endpoint

Reaction Rate

(1/time to endpoint)

10%

   

5%

   

2%

   

1%

   

Effects of Temperature on reaction Rate of Amylase at a Concentration of %

Temperature ( ° C)

Time to Endpoint

Reaction Rate

(1/time to endpoint)

0

Too slow to measure

Close to 0

10

   

2? Room temp

   

37

   

50

   

100

Never (why?)

0

Effects of pH on Reaction Rate of Amylase at a concentration of %

pH of buffer

Time to endpoint

Reaction Rate

( 1/time to endpoint)

3.4

   

5.0

   

6.8

   

8.0

   

Attached: 3 Graphs of the above three tables with the y-axis reaction rate and the x-axis is graph: 1. enzyme concentration, 2. Temperature, and 3. pH.

Conclusions:

 

Enzyme Inhibition: The Effects of Malonate on Succinyldehydrogenase

Introduction/Hypothesis

During the Kreb's Cycle in cellular respiration the enzyme succinyl-dehrogenase converts succinate to fumarate and yields energy by converting FAD to FADH2. As in many enzymatic reactions there is feedback control and malonate is suspected to be an inhibitor of this reaction. Since it is similar in structure to fumerate, I postulate that it will act as a competitive inhibitor by binding to the active site on the enzyme. The reaction rate will be affected mainly by the concentrations of the substrate and the inhibitor. If it is a noncompetitive inhibitor the reaction rate would be most affected by enzyme and inhibitor concentration as it would be binding to a different site on the enzyme. To test this we will use isolated ruptured mitochondria from germinating peas, which have a large number of active mitochondria.

Data and Observations:

Tube

Pea

Extract

Succinate

Malonate

Phosphate Buffer

Dye

Description

1

None

2 ml

None

3 ml

1 ml

Blank control

2

1 ml

2 ml

None

2 ml

1 ml

Uninhibited control

3

1 ml

2 ml

2 ml

None

1 ml

Substrate = inhibitor

4

1 ml

2 ml

1 ml

1 ml

1 ml

Substrate > inhibitor

5

1ml

1 ml

2 ml

1 ml

1 ml

Substrate < inhibitor

6

1 ml

No additional

2 ml

2 ml

1 ml

No added substrate

Comparison of tube color: no blue to most blue. Tube # and time it went colorless min.

Tube

1

2

3

4

5

6

Color when 1st tube had no blue

Darkest Blue Blank Control

         

Conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab Report 4 Cells and Transport

Name Section .

Introduction and Hypothesis

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data and Observations

A. Diffusion Rates

Solute

Molecular Weight

Distance Moved mm

Diffusion Rate mm/day

K2Cr2O

249.19

   

Methylene Blue

319.87

   

Congo Red

696.66

   

Observations

 

B. Osmosis (Water 1 ml/gram)

Tube Sugar Conc.

Initial Weight grams

Final Weight grams

Notes about volume changes

5%

 

     

10%

 

     

20%

 

     

40%

 

     

0%

 

     

 

 

C. Movement Across a Semipermeable Membrane

Outside the Sac Inside the Sac

Time (min)

Eosin

Starch

Cl-

SO4-

5

     

NA

10

     

NA

20

       

Conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab Report 5 Respiration

Name Section .

Introduction/ Hypotheses:

A. Oxygen Consumption in Plants and Animals

 

 

B. Effect of Substrate on Respiration in Yeast

 

 

Data and Observations:

A. Oxygen Consumption in Plants & Animals

Oxygen Reading in ppm at time (min)

Organism

Weight

Grams

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

                         
                         
                         
                         
                         

Total Oxygen Consumption

Organism

Total O2 in 20 min

O2 consumed/ gram body weight

Other observations

       
       
       
       
       

Conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B. The Effect of Substrate on Respiration in Yeast

Data & Observations:

Level of Fluid in tube (mm)

Time (min)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0

NC

             

10

NC

             

20

NC

             

30

NC

             

40

NC

             

50

NC

             

60

NC

             

Notes

Sugar

H2O

Glu

Fru

Gal

NS*

Lac

Malt

Suc

*NutriSweet

tI-tj Tube Change in Volume vtI - vtj (mm)

Time Period min

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0-10

               

10-20

               

20-30

               

30-40

               

40-50

               

50-60

               

Total 0-60

               
 

Water

glu

fru

gal

NS

malt

lac

Suc

Conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab Report 6 Photosynthesis

Name Section .

Introduction/ Hypothesis

The absorption spectrum of photosynthetic pigments should demonstrate the actual wavelengths (nm) of light utilized by the chloroplasts during photosynthesis. This should be verified by the actual action spectrum using live chloroplasts and an indicator dye that is reduced by H+ ions during the light reactions of photosynthesis.

A. Data and Observations: Absorption Spectrum Analysis

1. Observations on the Four Pigments:

(color and movement during chromatography )

2. Spectrum Analysis of the Four Pigments

Absorbence

Wavelength (nm)

Chlorophyll a

Chlorophyll b

Xanthophyll

b Carotene

420

       

440

       

460

       

480

       

500

       

520

       

540

       

560

       

580

       

600

       

620

       

640

       

680

       

700

       
         

See Attached graph of absorbence spectrum data (y-axis = absorbence, x-axis = wavelength (nm) )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B. Action Spectrum Analysis of Living Isolated Chloroplasts

(The light filter only lets light of that wavelength to pass through to the

chloroplasts)

Light Filter

Observations: Dye Reduction

Red

 

Blue

 

Yellow

Dye was reduced but not to the extent that it was in full light, red, and blue light

Green

 

Full Light

 

Foil Covered

No Light

 

 

Conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab Report Module 11 Natural Genetic Engineering

Name Section .

Introduction/ Hypothesis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data and Observations:

Genetic Engineering Data Table (Number and appearance of colonies)

Nutrient Agar Only Control

Nutrient Agar + chloramphenicol

Nutrient Agar + Rifampicin

Nutrient Agar + Chloamphnicol & Rifampicin

Donor Ht 99

 

     

Recipient J-53 R

 

     

Mating Mixture after 4 Hours

     

Mating Mixture after 6 hours

     

 

Conclusions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Modules 9 & 10 Lab Reports Drosophila Genetics I & II

Name Section .

Introduction/Hypothesis:

With its four large chromosomes and quick generation time Drosophila melanogaster should be a very useful organism for genetic studies. Our research will show that given recessive mutations for monohybrid, dihybrid, sex linked and autosomal linkage will behave as a good model for genetic research. By using a known marker we should be able to determine which chromosome a recessive allele is on. The traits we have chosen are: autosomal monohybrid , autosomal dihybrid , sex linked . In addition we will be determining which chromosome our autosomal mutation is on. We further believe that black body and vestigial wings are possibly linked. Analysis of crosses should illustrate this and tell us how many map units they are part. Data will be analyzed using the standard Chi- Square Test (X2).

Data and Observations:

I. Sex Linkage

Mutation P1 Female X wild type male Date mated:

F1 Observed data combined counts from the entire section. Date counted:

Phenotypes

Number of Males

Number of Females

Total Flies Counted

Wild type

     

 

 

     

Grand Total

     

Expected phenotypic ratio: .

Expected Number of Flies based on total flies observed

Phenotype

Males

Females

Wild

0

 
   

0

Chi- Square Results

Degrees of freedom = 1

X2 =

Probability =

 

 

 

F2 Generation Sex Linked Data Counts F1 female X F2 Male Date mated:

Observed Data Entire Section's Counts Date Counted:

Phenotype

Males

Females

Wild

   
     

Total

   

Expected phenotypic ratio: .

Expected Number of Flies Based on Total F2 Counts

Phenotype

Males

Females

Wild

   
     

Chi Square Analysis Results:

Degrees of Freedom . X2 = .Probability = .

II. Data Monohybrid Inheritance

Mutation P1 Female X Wild Male Date mated:

F1 Generation expected and observed phenotypic ratios: all wild

F2 Generation Counts Monohybrid F1 female X F1 male Date mated:

Observed F2 Data Entire Section's Counts Date counted:

Phenotype

Total

Wild

 
   

Grand Total

 

Expected phenotypic ratio: .

Expected Number Based on F2 Counts

Phenotype

Total

Wild

 
   

Chi Square Analysis Results:

Degrees of Freedom = 1 X2 = Probability = .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

III. Data Dihybrid Inheritance

Mutations P1 Female X wild type male Date mated:

F1 female X F1 male Date mated: F1 phenotypes all wild

Observed F2 Generation Data Dihybrid Section's Counts Date counted:

Phenotype

Total

Wild

 
   
   
   

Grand Total

 

Expected phenotypic ratio: .

Expected number of Flies Based on Total F2 Counts

Phenotype

Total

Wild

 
   
   
   

Chi Square Analysis results:

Degrees of Freedom = X2 = . Probability = .

 

IV. Marker Determination of the Location of the Autosomal Monohybrid Mutation

B- .

Phenotypic Counts F1 Data from P1 Virgin female X marker male

Phenotype

Males

Females

Total

Curly Dichaete

     

Curly Stubble

     

Plum Dichaete

     

Plum Stubble

     

Phenotypes of F1 male .X virgin mutant female .

Date mated: .

F2 Phenotypic Data Section's Counts

Phenotype

# Counted (sex is not important)

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Only people with a mutation on the 4th chromosome will have 8 phenotypes.

V. Data Autosomal Linkage of Black Body and Vestigial Wings

Number of Flies Per Phenotype

Lab Group

wild

Black: vestigial

Vestigial

Black

1

       

2

       

3

       

4

       

5

       

6

       

7

       

Grand total

       

% of total

       

Number Expected without Crossing Over Based on actual totals

Number

Wild

Black Vestigial

Vestigial

Black

     

0

0

% recombinants . Estimated Map Distance .

 

Conclusions: Modules 9 & 10 Drosophila Genetics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab Report Module 12 Human DNA Fingerprinting of an Alu Insertion in TPA- 25

Introduction/Hypothesis ( Should deal the genotypic and allelic frequencies of the presence or absence of the Alu TPA-25 insertion in your small section population and the entire larger population of Bio 151 and their comparison to the expected frequencies. Affect of size on Hardy- Weinberg calculations. Expected genotypic frequencies for the U.S. are as follows: homozygous present (+/+) 20.25%, heterozygous (+/-) 49.50%, and homozygous absent (-/-) 30.25%.)

 

 

Data and Observations: Number of Individuals

Section

Total Overall

Homozygous (+.+)

Heterozygous (+,-)

Homozygous (-,-)

001

       

002

       

003

       

004

       

005

       

006

       

007

       

008

       

009

       

010

       

011

       

012

       

013

       

014

       

401

       

402

       

Grant Total

       

Expected frequencies of the Alu genotypes: +/+ = 0.2025, +/- = 0.4950, and -/- = 0.3025.

The Results of Calculations of the Genotypic Frequencies of Alu Insertion

Genotype

Your Section

Entire Bio 151 Population

+/+ Homozygous

   

+/- Heterozygous

   

-/- Homozygous

   

 

 

 

 

The Results of Calculating the Allelic Frequencies

Allele

Your Section

Entire Bio 151 Population

Present (+)

   

Absent (-)

   

Genetic Frequency Data and Chi Square Results

 

Observed your section

Expected Your Section

Observed All of Bio 151

Expected All of Bio 151

Homozygous (+/+)

       

Heterozygous (+/-)

       

Homozygous (-/-)

       

Degrees of Freedom

       

X2 Value

       

Probability

       

 

 

 

Conclusions: