|
University of Kentucky Discovery Seminar Program DSP 110 Civil Liberties
Prof. Robert S. Tannenbaum
To download a pdf version of the syllabus, click here. (Please note that the pdf version of the syllabus may not be updated during the semester. For the latest version, you should rely on the html version below.)
Dr. Robert S. Tannenbaum Undergraduate Instructional Assistant:
Course Description This course is an introduction to and overview of the basic civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, various state constitutions, and rulings of federal and state courts. We will consider those rights that are commonly thought to be our civil liberties, the history of their recognition as principles of law and civil behavior, how their interpretation has evolved over the life of our nation, key legislation and legal decisions that have shaped their interpretation and application, and recent and current cases in which these rights may play a determining role. We also will explore relevant social and political issues, to consider the implications of these civil liberties for our society. The course will consist of seminar/discussions of the principles, ideas, and issues raised by readings, videos, guest lecturers, and field trips. All students will be expected to complete all reading assignments before class meetings, to be active participants in each class discussion, to keep a journal of their reactions to and concerns regarding the issues before the class, to lead class discussions at least once during the course, and to complete a final project. Each student will be required to participate in a ride-along with a Lexington Police patrol. If the docket of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals or of the Federal District Court allows, students will be required to go on a field trip to the court to attend arguments in a case that raises significant civil liberties issues.
Objectives By the completion of the seminar, you should be able to: • Demonstrate increased skill in writing short scholarly reports and papers
Reading Assignments Most reading assignments will be from the course textbooks: 1. Glasser, Ira. Visions of Liberty: The Bill of Rights for all Americans. NY: Arcade Publishing, 1991. Please note: this book is out of print. If the bookstore cannot obtain copies, there are many used copies available quite inexpensively via Amazon.Com. This is an extremely important book for the course, so please be sure to get a copy one way or another. (You should note that this book was published in both hard and soft cover. The hard cover version has better illustrations, but they both have the same text.) 2. Meador, Daniel John. American Courts (2nd Edition). St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1991. 3. Lapidus, Lenora, Emily Martin, and Namita Luthra. The Rights of Women: The Authoritative ACLU Guide to Women’s Rights (4th Edition). ACLU, New York. 2009. (This book is scheduled for release April 1, 2009. I am trying to obtain advance copies for members of this class.) Further reading assignments from other sources, such as court decisions and relevant documents, will be made during the course. These readings will be handed out or, more likely, be posted on the course web site: <http://www.uky.edu/~rst/dsp110>. Several such readings are listed in this syllabus. Your Responsibilities It is your responsibility to finish all of the assigned readings before the class meetings at which they will be discussed. It is also your responsibility to acquaint yourself with the “Key Cases” noted for each class meeting before the class (you do not have to read the entire decision, but you must study the case “syllabus” to learn the basics of the case and the decision). I will not be lecturing on the material or repeating details. We will be discussing the concepts and their implications. In order for you to take an active and meaningful part in the discussion, you must have read and understood the material first. To assist you with your reading comprehension, I have prepared a “participation/study guide” that you will be required to complete in duplicate for each assignment. You will turn in one copy at the beginning of the class (which will contribute to your participation grade), and keep the second copy for your use during the discussion. You should note, as explained below, that a large portion of your grade depends upon your active participation in and contribution to these discussions. In your journal, you will be expected to comment critically on the readings, and these comments will count as part of your participation grade. Even if you already have an e-mail account with another service provider, you must use your UK e-mail account for all e-mail and submission of assignments. You are responsible for checking your e-mail on a regular basis. A communication from me via e-mail will be considered the same as one delivered orally or in writing in class. That is, you are expected to have read what has been transmitted and taken the necessary action. You must submit all written assignments in electronic form, via e-mail. The written portions of all assignments, including your journal entries, must be completed in Microsoft Word (latest version) and included as an attachment to the e-mail. If you have to use another application program in the completion of an assignment, it is your responsibility to ensure that the submitted project is readable by me on my computer in Word. You may submit a paper copy of an assignment to ensure that it is readable and/or to include any special materials (e.g., a photocopy of a relevant document that is not readily available electronically).
Assignments
Grading Unless otherwise explicitly stated by me, all work must be the original product of your efforts, and all materials quoted or derived from others must be properly credited. You should refer to the Students Rights and Responsibilities code (especially section 6.3.0) for a discussion of the University’s policies regarding academic integrity. The code can be found on-line at: http://www.uky.edu/StudentAffairs/Code/. Grading will be based on active participation in the course and on the quality of the assignments you complete. Your grade will be based upon four general categories:
5. Extra Credit
The maximum total points available during the semester is 500, awarded as shown below:
Grades will be awarded as follows:
Topics This course is intended to introduce students to the basic civil liberties of persons in the United States through readings, discussions, videos, guests, debates, in-class exercises, journals, and field trips. From the first days of the Constitution, there has been a tension between democracy — that is, the rule of the majority — and individual freedoms. Majority (or “super majority”) rule is the basis of most of the Constitution. However, many people realized that it was also essential to provide for the rights of individuals. Hence, the Bill of Rights was appended to the original document. The point of conflict between the rule of the majority and the rights of individuals is the essence of civil liberties. The interpretation of the Constitution and what it dictates at this point of conflict is the responsibility of the courts. There has always been a philosophical difference of opinion between those who insist that the Constitution is to be interpreted only in terms of exactly what it says (“strict constructionists”) and those who believe that the Constitution is a “living, breathing” document that should be read in terms of the principles it sets out and that those principles should be extrapolated to the present. We will explore civil liberties with this difference of opinion in mind. The planned topics include, but may not be limited to: • Definitions of “freedom,” “liberty,” and “civil liberties”
Course Schedule All written assignments (other than journals) are due electronically at the beginning of class on the day indicated; assignments may be turned in early. So that we can accommodate timely discussions of important current events, this schedule should be understood to be somewhat tentative. Because this is a seminar concerning civil liberties and because there are often important civil liberties issues that arise without too much advance warning, we will have to be flexible concerning when (and even whether) we cover all of the topics listed above. In addition, if a member of the class brings a particularly interesting or important news report or article to class, we may not have sufficient time remaining after discussing it to complete the previously scheduled subject. Changes to the schedule will be announced as far in advance as possible in class, on the class Web site <http://www.uky.edu/~rst/DSP110>, and by e-mail. It is your responsibility to keep up-to-date on any changes to the schedule and related assignments. Even if the schedule changes, you will still be required to participate in the seminar and to keep and submit your journal entries and other assignments on time. 1/15 Introduction; class expectations; Pre-class assignment on a contemporary civil liberties issue due; Reading: Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Last day to inform me in writing of an intended absence for a major religious holiday.) 1/20 Presidential Inauguration. Class will not meet. 1/22 The birth of civil liberties — History prior to the Bill of Rights; Reading: Glasser, pp. 1-61 1/26 First journal entry due 1/27 Creating the Bill of Rights and the philosophy underlying civil liberties (the essence of civil liberties is at the point of conflict between majority rule and individual freedoms); Reading: Constitution of the United States 1/29 Court systems in the United States; Reading: Meador, pp. 1-77; Extra credit opportunity: view the ACLU Freedom File on The Supreme Court and write a brief review 2/2 Second journal entry due 2/3 First amendment — Freedom of speech and assembly; Boyd County High School Gay-Straight Alliance; Readings: Glasser, pp. 100-151; Key Cases: Boyd County court documents (I), Second 6th Circuit Morrison decision; Morrison Petition for Certiorari; Extra credit opportunity: view the ACLU Freedom File on Youth Speak and/or the Freedom File on Dissent and write a brief review 2/5 First amendment — Religious freedom and non-establishment clauses; Kentucky Ten Commandments Cases; Readings: Glasser, pp. 62-99; Key Cases: McCreary County v. ACLU of KY (2005), Stone v. Graham (1980); Guest: David Friedman, General Counsel, ACLU of Kentucky; Extra credit opportunity: view the ACLU Freedom File on Religious Freedom and write a brief review 2/10 First amendment — Freedom of the press; Key Cases: NY Times v. Sullivan (1964), NY Times v. US (1971), Virginia v. Black (2003); Assignment 1 due 2/12 Second amendment — Right to keep and bear arms; Gun control; Readings: Bogus, Carl T. Chapter 1 of The Second Amendment in Law and History, New York: The New Press, 2000, to be distributed in class; Key Case: District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) 2/16 Third journal entry due 2/17 Fourth amendment — Unreasonable search and seizure; Reading: Glasser, pp. 152-179 2/19 Fifth amendment — Self-incrimination; Key Cases: Miranda v Arizona (1966), Rhode Island v Innis (1980), Miller v Fenton (1986), Brewer v. Williams (1977) 2/23 Fourth journal entry due 2/24 The role of police; Field trip to Lexington Police headquarters; Guest: Lt. James Curless; Arrange for your ride-along with a police patrol. This is a required field trip and will entail more time than the usual course meeting. You will need to leave campus by 3:30 and will not be back until close to 6. 2/26 Fifth amendment — Grand jury and double jeopardy; Readings: Grand Jury Indictment versus Prosecution by Information (click here for a pdf version); Double Jeopardy 3/3 Fifth amendment (and fourteenth amendment) — Due process of law; Readings: Due Process of Law (I); Due Process of Law (II); Definition of Due Process of Law (I); Definition of Due Process of Law (II); Assignment 2 due 3/5 Sixth amendment — Right to confront witnesses; speedy, public trial by jury in criminal cases; and the right to counsel; Key Case: Gideon v. Wainwright (1963); Extra credit opportunity: read Lewis, Anthony, Gideon’s Trumpet. New York: Vintage Books, 1966. and write a brief review. This is a long book. A brief review of only a part of the book may be worth up to 5 extra credit points; a longer review, after having read the entire book, may be worth up to 20 extra credit points. 3/9 Fifth journal entry due; Midterm of the semester: you are entitled to a mid-semester grade in each of your courses. 3/10 Field trip to meet and visit with Hon. John Rogers, Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, and to hear oral arguments before the Court. This trip is a required part of the course. We will leave at 11 AM and return in the evening. You should note that a class field trip constitutes an automatic excuse for missing another class. However, you will have to make arrangements to make up any work you miss in other courses you may have on Tuesday. I will be happy to write a letter for you to your other professor(s). Docket for our visit; Case materials: Lindsley; Sybrandt I; Sybrandt II; Sybrandt III; Osborn I; Osborn II; Osborn III; Osborn IV; Kincade 3/12 Class will not meet 3/16 Sixth journal entry due 3/24 Eighth amendment — Cruel and unusual punishment, conditions of confinement (prison conditions), and evolving standards of decency; Reading: Newman, Graeme, Just and Painful, Chapter 9 “Cruel and Unusual?” New York: The Free Press, 1985; Wittes, Benjamin, “What is ‘Cruel and Unusual’?” Policy Review, No. 134, December 2005 & January 2006, Hoover Institution, Stanford University; Key case: Robinson v. California (1962) 3/26 Eighth amendment — Death penalty; Key Cases: Furman v. Georgia (1972); Gregg v. Georgia (1976) 3/31 Eighth amendment — Death penalty; Readings: Turow, "To Kill or Not To Kill," New Yorker, January 6, 2003, pp. 40-47; Beckman, Mary. “Crime, Culpability, and the Adolescent Brain.” Science, July 30, 2004. Vol. 305. pp. 596-599; Toobin, Jeffrey, “Death in Georgia,” New Yorker, February 4, 2008, pp. 32-37 (all three articles available on-line); Guest: Carl Wedekind, retired attorney, anti-death penalty lobbyist and author; Extra credit opportunity: read Carl Wedekind's book: Politics Religion and Death, Memoir of a Lobbyist, Louisville: Kentucky Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, 2006, (on reserve in the Law Library) and write a brief review. This is a long book. A brief review of only a part of the book may be worth up to 5 extra credit points; a longer review,after having read the entire book, may be worth up to 20 extra credit points; Assignment 3 due 4/2 Fourteenth amendment — Due process and equal protection; Reading: Rights Guaranteed: Due Process of Law; Key Case: In Re Slaughter-House Cases (1872) 4/3 Last day to withdraw from courses 4/6 Seventh journal entry due 4/7 Racial equality — Early history and school desegregation, housing, employment, accommodations, etc.; Reading: Glasser, pp. 180-227; Extra credit opportunity: view the ACLU Freedom File on Racial Profiling and write a brief review 4/9 Right to privacy; Key Cases: Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), Roe v. Wade (1973), Washington v. Glucksberg (1997); Extra credit opportunity: read Alderman, Ellen and Caroline Kennedy. The Right to Privacy. New York: Vantage Books. 1997, and write a review. This is a long book. A brief review of only a part of the book may be worth up to 5 extra credit points; a longer review, after having read the entire book, may be worth up to 20 extra credit points. 4/13 Eighth journal entry due 4/14 Roe v. Wade and reproductive freedom; Readings: Lapidus et al., pp. ??; Leland, John, “Under Din of Abortion Debate, an Experience Shared Quietly” New York Times, September 18, 2005. (Article available on-line); Key Cases: Roe v. Wade (1973), Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989), Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992); Guest: Derek Selznick, Director ACLU of Kentucky Reproductive Freedom Project 4/16 Women’s rights — Nineteenth amendment; Readings: Glasser, pp. 240-252; Lapidus et al., pp. ??, Stanton, The Declaration of Sentiments; Extra credit opportunity: view the ACLU Freedom File on Women's Rights and write a brief review 4/21 Women’s and children’s rights — Sexual harassment, discrimination, etc.; Reading: Lapidus et al., pp. ??; Guest: Kathy Stein, Attorney and Kentucky State Senator 4/23 Rights of GLBT persons — Same sex marriage, employment and housing discrimination, etc.; Readings: TBA; Guest: Prof. Lucinda Ramberg, UK Anthropology Department; Extra credit opportunity: view the ACLU Freedom File on Gay and Lesbian Rights and write a brief review 4/28 Oral presentations of final projects 4/29 Special extra credit opportunity: Showcase of undergraduate scholars, 4 PM - 7 PM, Student Center, Harris Grand Ballroom, attend and write a brief review 4/30 Oral presentations of final projects; Final written project due to me by 5:30 PM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||