Weed Control in Pepper and Sweet Corn - UKREC - 2003
Joseph Masabni, Department of Horticulture, Princeton

Two experiments were conducted in 2003 to test labeled and two experimental herbicides on pepper and sweet corn. The experimental herbicides are not labeled yet on pepper and must not be used as this is against federal law. The purpose of trying new and experimental herbicides is to collect data to support their registration, in the case they performed well.

The two experiments were conducted at the University of Kentucky Research and Education Center (UKREC) in Princeton, KY.

Materials and Methods

The experimental design used for both experiments was a randomized complete block design with 3 replications. Prior to planting, lime and fertilizer were amended per soil test recommendations. A final soil workup was performed prior to planting to level any plow ridges and to break up any soil clods.

Pepper: Plot size was 6 ft wide by 35 ft long. Raised beds, 6" high, were shaped and drip-irrigation was installed using a plastic layer. No plastic was laid for this experiment since bareground was essential to test the effectiveness of the herbicides used. Once all the herbicide treatments were applied, 2 rows of peppers, one for Olympus and one for Wizard varieties, were hand-transplanted on May 22, 2003, at 2 ft spacing within rows. This is equivalent to 17 plants for each variety per bed/treatment. Herbicide treatments were applied using a 4 8002-nozzle boom backpack sprayer set at 30 psi and 20 GPA with a 5.3 ft spray swath width. For the preplant incorporated treatments, a garden rake was used to manually incorporate the herbicides on the sprayed beds. The postemergence treatments were applied on July 9, 2003, or 69 days after transplanting when plants were about 12" tall. Of all the herbicides used, only Sencor and Matrix are not currently registered for use on pepper.

Sweet corn: Plot size was 6.5 ft wide by 80 ft long. Ten sh2 sweet corn varieties were seeded on April 22, 2003, using a John Deere plate seeder at 9" spacing. Three varieties had yellow kernels (6800 Y, AC945 Y, and Saturn Y). Four varieties had bicolor kernels (6802R BC, Camas BC, Saturn BC, and 8102R BC). Three varieties had white kernels (Boreal W, Saturn W, and 8101R W). The herbicide treatments were applied perpendicular to the seeded corn, in order to test the effect of herbicide treatments on each variety. The preemergence herbicide treatments were applied on May 15, 2003, and the postemergence treatments were applied on June 18, 2003. All sprays were applied using a 2 8002-nozzle boom backpack sprayer set at 30 psi and 20 GPA with a spray swath width of 3.3 ft. The herbicide treatments were 3.3 ft wide and ran across all 3 replications. With sweet corn seeded at 9" spacing, there’s about 4.3 seeds in the 3.3 ft herbicide band. Of the herbicides used in this experiment, Axiom, Callisto, Option, and Lumax are experimental herbicides and their labels specifically ban their use in sweet corn.

For both experiments, weed control effectiveness were determined by a visual injury ratings using a scale of 1 – 10, with 1 equivalent to no injury or similar to the control plot, and 10 equivalent to complete kill or none present.

The following are abbreviations used in the tables below: DAT = days after treatment; PPI = preplant incorporated; PRT = pre-transplant; POT = post-transplant; PO1 = postemergence; EBNS = eastern black nightshade; LACG = large crabgrass; ILMG = Ivy leaf morningglory; JG = Johnsongrass; HVMW = honeyvine milkweed; CAWE = carpetweed, COPU = common purslane; COCO = common cocklebur.

Results and Discussion

Pepper:

Table 1 includes the visual injury ratings of pepper and weeds present, taken at 20 DAT. Both pepper varieties showed little or no herbicide injury with all treatments, except treatment 2 which included Sencor 0.5 lb ai/A PPI. As mentioned above, Sencor is not currently labeled and the observed injury explains why. Matrix was the other experimental herbicide showed little or no injury when applied PRE or POT. All treatments showed excellent levels of weed control, when compared to the level of weeds present in control plots.

Table 2 includes the visual injury ratings of pepper and weeds present, taken at 47 DAT or 2 days before postemergence treatments were applied. Sencor 0.5 PPI continues to show injury on both pepper varieties. Treflan 1 PPI and Dual Magnum 1.33 POT were the safest treatments on peppers. Treflan still had good control of Johnsongrass and large crabgrass, but was weak on honeyvine milkweed and carpetweed, and had no control of eastern black nightshade. The low rating values of Treflan on eastern black nightshade, at 47 DAT, must be attributed to a new flush of emerged weeds. Dual Magnum applied POT, had the equivalent of 80% control of eastern black nightshade at 47 DAT, but lost its effectiveness on carpetweed.

At 47 DAT, Matrix 0.031 PRT resulted in a severe injury, at least 60% reduction in plant vigor and height, on both pepper varieties. This injury was not noticed at the first evaluation on 20 DAT. Matrix appears to be very effective in its control of Johnsongrass and carpetweed but had little effect on eastern black nightshade.

Table 3 lists the total yields of 3 harvests of both varieties for all herbicide treatments. The effects of postemergence treatments can be found in table 3. Injury in peppers observed with Sencor PPI and Matrix PRT is very evident with total number and weight of peppers harvested. Matrix resulted in an average of 13 and 17 fruits per plot, equal to about 1 fruit per plant, compared to 37 and 54 fruits in the control plots. Matrix appears to be very safe on peppers when applied postemergence and resulted in the highest yielding plot of Olympus pepper and 3rd highest for Wizard pepper. Matrix applied POT also resulted in yields better than Treflan or Dual Magnum applied alone. Treflan PPI followed by Command PRT gave the highest yields in Olympus pepper, whereas Dual Magnum gave the highest yields in Wizard pepper.

Table 1. Weed control effectiveness in pepper rated at 20 days after treatment.

   

Rate

Appl.

Weed Control Rating 20 DAT

  Treatment*

Lb ai/A

Stage

Olympus

Wizard

EBNS

LACG

ILMG

1

Treflan

1

PPI

2

2

9

9

9

2

Treflan

1

PPI

4

5

10

10

9

  Sencor

0.5

PPI

         

3

Treflan

1

PPI

2

2

9

10

9

  Command

0.25

PRT

         

5

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

1

1

10

10

9

7

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

2

1

10

10

9

  Matrix

0.031

POT

         

10

Matrix

0.031

PRT

2

2

10

9

10

11

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

1

1

10

10

9

12

Untreated  

PRE

1

1

1

1

1

LSD (5%)

0.8

1.3

0.5

0.9

1.7

Standard Deviation

0.5

0.7

0.3

0.5

1.0

CV

27.27

41.37

3.26

6.07

11.8

* Only treatments already applied at this date are included in this table.

 

Table 2. Weed control effectiveness in pepper rated at 47 days after treatment.

   

Rate

Appl.

Weed Control Rating 47 DAT

  Treatment *

Lb ai/A

Stage

Olympus

Wizard

ILMG

JG

LACG

EBNS

HVMW

CAWE

1

Treflan

1

PPI

1

1

6

7

7

2

5

5

2

Treflan

1

PPI

3

5

5

10

7

5

8

4

  Sencor

0.5

PPI

               

3

Treflan

1

PPI

1

2

3

10

7

3

6

2

  Command

0.25

PRT

               

5

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

1

1

5

8

10

8

6

4

7

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

1

1

8

10

10

7

5

9

  Matrix

0.031

POT

               

10

Matrix

0.031

PRT

6

6

8

10

9

3

7

10

12

Untreated  

PRE

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

LSD (5%)

1.2

1.9

5.3

4.0

4.0

3.9

4.9

4.1

Standard Deviation

0.7

1.1

3.1

2.4

2.4

2.3

2.9

2.4

CV

37.08

50.81

61.49

28.9

31.97

47.34

49.39

46.6

* Only treatments already applied at this date are included in this table.

 

Table 3. Total yields of Olympus and Wizard peppers.

       

TOTAL YIELD

   

Rate

Appl.

Olympus

Wizard

  Treatment

Lb ai/A

Stage

No./PLOT

KG/PLOT

No./PLOT

KG/PLOT

1

Treflan

1

PPI

62

10.1

60

9.8

2

Treflan

1

PPI

48

8.4

45

7.2

  Sencor

0.5

PPI

       

3

Treflan

1

PPI

78

13.5

74

12.8

  Command

0.25

PRT

       

4

Treflan

1

PPI

63

8.6

78

10.8

  Sandea

0.032

PO1

       
  NIS

0.5

PO1

       

5

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

71

12.4

101

15.9

6

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

77

11.8

73

11.7

  Sandea

0.032

PO1

       
  NIS

0.5

PO1

       

7

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

55

9.2

76

12.4

  Matrix

0.031

POT

       

8

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

85

12.5

94

13.5

  Matrix

0.031

PO1

       

9

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

74

10.4

69

9.9

  Sandea

0.032

PO1

       
  Matrix

0.031

PO1

       
  NIS

0.5

PO1

       

10

Matrix

0.031

PRT

13

1.9

17

2.3

  Matrix

0.031

PO1

       

11

Dual Magnum

1.33

POT

79

13.5

102

15.5

  Dacthal

7.5

Late PO1

       

12

Untreated  

PRE

37

5.8

54

8.2

  Poast

0.19

PO1

       
  COC

1%

PO1

       

LSD (5%)

26.9

3.71

28.7

4.28

Standard Deviation

15.9

2.19

17.0

2.53

CV

25.74

22.29

24.12

23.34

 

Sweet corn:

The 10 sweet corn varieties were not rated for visual injury due to the complexity of this experiment 10 varieties/treatment and 12 treatments). Table 4 lists the weed control ratings taken at 33 DAT. Only preemergence treatments are listed in this table, since postemergence treatments weren’t applied at this rating date.

Of the registered sweet corn herbicides, Outlook and Dual Magnum were best for common purslane and large crabgrass control, whereas Aatrex and Outlook were slightly better on common cocklebur. The non-labeled herbicide Axiom completely killed all 3 weeds present at this rating date. Lumax followed closely with 100% kill of common purslane and common cocklebur and about 80% control of large crabgrass. Of the 3 non-labeled herbicides, Callisto was weakest on common purslane and large crabgrass, but still had excellent control (95%) of common cocklebur.

Tables 5 shows sweet corn yields in kg/plot and Table 6 lists the number of ears/plot for all 10 sweet corn varieties. Both tables clearly indicate that the 10 sweet corn variety responded differently to an herbicide. Differences or similarities in kernel color are not a good predictor of the response of the sweet corn variety to an herbicide treatment. Yields ranged from 0.5 – 3 kg/plot for Outlook preemergence, and from 0.2 – 1.4 when applied postemergence. Yields of plots treated with Aatrex were similar to those treated with Outlook. In addition, there were no observed differences in yields and number of ears per plot with Outlook applied either preemergence or postemergence.

Axiom (treatment 3) and Lumax (treatment 10), both not labeled for sweet corn, performed equally if not better than Outlook and Aatrex for all 10 varieties both in yields (Table 5) and number of ears / plot (Table 6). Similarly, when Option was applied postemergence following a preemergence application of Dual Magnum (treatment 8), yield and number of ears / plot were equal if not better than Outlook or Aatrex applied alone.

Table 4. Weed control effectiveness in sweet corn rated at 33 days after treatment.

Trt Treatment

Rate

Appl.

Weed Control Rating 33 DAT

No. Name

Lb ai/A

Stage

COPU

COCO

LACG

1 Outlook

0.75

PRE

8

4

9

3 Axiom

0.77

PRE

10

10

10

4 AAtrex

1

PRE

10

4

4

5 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

8

2

9

6 Callisto

0.2

PRE

1

10

2

7 Callisto

0.14

PRE

4

9

5

8 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

8

2

9

10 Lumax

2.5QT

PRE

10

10

8

12 Untreated    

1

1

1

LSD (5%)

4.8

2.3

3.1

Standard Deviation

2.8

1.4

1.9

CV

44.5

29.3

28.9

Table 5. Yield in kg/plot of ten sh2 sweet corn varieties treated with herbicides.

 

Yield (Kg) / Plot – 57 to 69 DAT

Trt No. Treatment Name

Rate Lb ai/A

Appl. Stage

6800 Y

AC945 Y

SATURN Y

6802R BC

CAMAS BC

SATURN BC

8102R BC

BOREAL W

SATURN W

8101R W

1 Outlook

0.75

PRE

1.4

2.1

0.8

1.6

1.2

2.0

1.1

0.5

3.0

0.6

2 Outlook

0.75

PO1

1.3

0.75

0.2

0.9

0.5

1.4

1.0

0.3

1.0

0.4

3 Axiom

0.77

PRE

1.3

3.2

1.5

1.4

1.3

1.4

1.0

0.9

2.7

0.8

4 Aatrex

1

PRE

1.1

1.8

0.6

1.6

1.5

1.9

1.3

0.5

2.8

1.0

5 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

1.0

2.3

0.9

1.0

1.3

1.6

1.1

1.0

2.3

0.9

  Sandea

0.032

PO1

                   
  NIS

0.25%

PO1

                   
6 Callisto

0.2

PRE

1.0

1.9

0.7

1.4

0.9

1.8

1.0

0.4

2.2

1.4

7 Callisto

0.14

PRE

1.6

2.0

1.2

1.3

1.6

1.5

1.1

0.1

2.3

1.4

  Callisto

0.06

PO1

                   
8 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

1.6

1.7

1.5

1.4

1.8

2.1

1.0

0.7

2.2

1.0

  Option

0.033

PO1

                   
  MSO

1%

PO1

                   
9 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

1.2

0.7

1.3

1.4

0.6

1.5

0.9

0.5

1.9

0.6

  Clarity

0.5

PO1

                   
10 Lumax

2.5QT

PRE

1.6

2.2

1.4

1.6

1.9

1.6

1.2

1.4

3.8

1.3

11 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

1.0

1.5

0.7

1.0

1.1

1.5

1.2

0.6

1.9

0.8

  Sandea

0.047

PO1

                   
  NIS

0.25%

PO1

                   
12 Untreated    

1.0

0.7

0.6

1.0

0.6

1.3

0.6

0.6

1.8

0.3

LSD (5%)

0.83

1.10

0.81

0.74

0.66

0.85

0.89

0.87

1.53

0.78

Standard Deviation

0.49

0.65

0.48

0.43

0.39

0.50

0.52

0.52

0.90

0.46

CV

38.8

36.9

50.2

33.5

32.9

30.9

50.9

82.9

38.5

53.1

 

Table 6. Yield in number of ears/plot of ten sh2 sweet corn varieties treated with various herbicides.

 

Number of Ears / Plot – 57 to 69 DAT

Trt No. Treatment Name

Rate Lb ai/A

Appl. Stage

6800 Y

AC945 Y

SATURN Y

6802R BC

CAMAS BC

SATURN BC

8102R BC

BOREAL W

SATURN W

8101R W

1 Outlook

0.75

PRE

7

6

4

10

7

10

6

3

8

3

2 Outlook

0.75

PO1

6

4

1

7

4

6

5

1

3

3

3 Axiom

0.77

PRE

7

9

9

9

8

7

4

5

7

3

4 Aatrex

1

PRE

6

6

3

9

9

10

6

4

7

4

5 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

5

7

5

6

7

7

4

5

5

5

  Sandea

0.032

PO1

                   
  NIS

0.25%

PO1

                   
6 Callisto

0.2

PRE

4

6

4

8

5

9

5

2

6

7

7 Callisto

0.14

PRE

9

6

7

7

9

7

5

1

5

6

  Callisto

0.06

PO1

                   
8 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

8

5

8

8

11

11

5

4

6

5

  Option

0.033

PO1

                   
  MSO

1%

PO1

                   
9 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

9

4

8

9

6

8

5

7

6

4

  Clarity

0.5

PO1

                   
10 Lumax

2.5QT

PRE

8

6

7

8

9

10

5

6

9

6

11 Dual Magnum

1.33

PRE

6

5

4

6

7

8

6

3

5

4

  Sandea

0.047

PO1

                   
  NIS

0.25%

PO1

                   
12 Untreated    

5

3

4

6

6

9

3

2

5

3

LSD (5%)

4.1

3.6

4.6

5.0

4.4

3.6

3.7

4.9

3.9

3.3

Standard Deviation

2.4

2.1

2.7

2.9

2.6

2.1

2.2

2.9

2.3

2.0

CV

36.9

38.3

50.6

37.6

34.9

24.5

44.0

77.7

38.9

43.8

Back to Research Reports  HOME