Mexico!
las reformas in the Cardenas era 1934-1940
1. Three major points to be considered with respect to the reforms:
i.
Social & economic reforms: the specifics
Agrarian
reform:
Land
redistribution
reading Bazant
Massive
government infrastructure investment:
1940-1980: 90% of agricultural investment in north,
10% in south
images: irrigation districts
Parastatals:
e.g., Diconsa,
CONASUPO: state-run food manufacturing industries
INMECAFE:
national coffee parastatal
Resource reform: Expropriacion petrolero:
National ownership of resources, e.g. oil, subsurface deposits, shorelines
images: oil deposits, refining zones
Industrial reform:
Nationalized infrastructure:
Electric grid
Railways/roads
image: railway development
Summary 1980: nationalized & quasi-state industries:
Tourism: Private-Public ventures
Petroleum industry
Banking/finance
Nuclear power
Agricultural products and markets
food distribution and manufacturing
Mining (lead, gold, silver)
electric power grid
irrigation districts
Television: nationally owned TV
ii. Political reforms: The making of a party
Lázaro Cárdenas & the political consolidation:
1932-1940
the sexenio: political struggle and caudismo
replaced by 6-year rotations
presidentialism: tremendous power placed in
presidency (or is it?)
four cornerstones of the Mexican state:
i. workers: CTM (Confederación de Trabajadores
Mexicanos)
ii. peasants: CNC (Confederación Nacional de
Campesinos)
iii. women: jefes de manzana, urban neighborhood
associations
iv. industrial bourgeoisie:
Obregón
·
reforms off to a slow
start
·
Obregón wants to profit
·
afraid of U.S. imperialism
·
most reforms in southern
Mexico
·
picks Calles not
Vasconcelos, educational reformer (socialist education)
Calles
Cárdenas
reforms party
revitalizes social reforms
reconstitutes military
Corporatism: The Mexican state governs through the
Œfour cornerstones¹ NOT through elections
Patron-Client ties (also called patronage or
clientalism): pyramidal structures where economic benefits are distributed in
return for political support
Mexican State
Peasants Workers Block committees Industrialists
National
Leaders
regional
leaders regional
leaders
regional leaders
local members local
members local
members
Bureaucratic authoritarianism: a phenomena throughout Latin America and
elsewhere‹State bureaucracies exercise tremendous influence over economy and
society through distribution of assets, loan monies, permits, and expertise
3. Contradictions of the Porfiriado are resolved, yet
new contradictions result
i. Problem of effective demand (underconsumption): Under
the Porfiriado most people were too poor to consume,
state becomes major consumer (of investments, capital)
for industrial and infrastructure production
Œlabor elite¹ of petroleum, industrial and state
bureaucratic producers with relatively high salaries stimulates consumption
ii. Problem of low agricultural productivity:
resolved through land distribution, irrigation and agro-industrialization
iii. Problem of lack of investment: the Mexican state
underpins investment in infrastructure and industrial production
iv. Political problem: revolution created by
disenfranchised persons, the extensive corporatist and economic enfranchisement
ends political opposition in the short-term
New contradictions:
i. consumption: a growing number of Mexicans are left out
of economic growth
ii. Peasants get marginal lands + low investment in
Southern Mexico leads to national inequities
iii. Investments are politicized, currency is
overvalued, investments do not yield sufficient returns, oil-dependence
backfires
iv. The Mexican state turns away from corporate
structures as these same structures become less robust, new Mexican politics
takes place outside traditional corporatist structures