Research Design
Home Up Contents Executive Summary Introductory Stories Emergent Themes Policy Issues Recommendations

Site Selection

Kentucky is a rural state.  Most policy decisions, however, are made in the metropolitan region of central Kentucky.  In contrast, our research was conducted in seven non-metropolitan, rural counties.  At the request of the DAEL, we also included a metropolitan county as an example of a “commuter” area, but were unable to collect interviews in that site.  Our data, therefore, includes the perspectives of individuals living in rural areas and may be different from the experiences and observations of practitioners who serve urban and suburban populations.  The US Department of Agriculture designates 98 of Kentucky’s 120 counties as rural; therefore, we believe that this study has much to add to our understanding of the state’s needs outside of metropolitan areas.  Table One identifies the regional and economic characteristics of Kentucky’s counties. 

 Table One: Site Selection Matrix

Economic Type

Western Kentucky

Central Kentucky

Eastern Kentucky

Farming

Breckenridge, Carlisle, McLean

Casey, Larue, Green, Robertson, Spencer, Washington

None

Mining

Hopkins, Livingston, Muhlenberg, Ohio, Union, Webster

None

Bell, Breathitt, Clay, Floyd, Harlan, Knott, Leslie, Letcher, Magoffin, Martin, Perry, Pike

Manufacturing

Allen, Ballard, Barren, Butler, Graves, Grayson, Hancock, Logan, Marshall, Monroe, Simpson, Todd

Anderson, Boyle, Carroll, Harrison, Mason, Mercer, Nelson, Nicholas, Russell, Shelby, Taylor, Wayne

None

Government

Edmonson, Hardin, Lyon

Franklin, McCreary

Elliott, Menifee, Owsley, Rowan, Wolfe

Services

McCracken

Pulaski, Trimble

Johnson, Lawrence, Lee, Whitley

Nonspecialized

Caldwell, Calloway, Crittenden, Fulton, Hickman, Meade, Trigg, Warren,

Adair, Bath, Bracken, Clinton, Cumberland, Garrard, Hart, Henry, Lincoln, Marion, Metcalfe, Owen, Rockcastle,

Estill, Fleming, Jackson, Knox, Laurel, Lewis, Montgomery, Morgan, Powell

Metropolitan

Christian, Henderson, Daviess,

Bullitt, Jefferson, Oldham, Fayette, Jessamine, Madison, Woodford, Scott, Clark, Bourbon, Boone, Kenton, Campbell, Grant, Pendleton, Gallatin

Boyd, Carter, Greenup,

The seven rural sites were chosen based on economic profiles defined by the USDA.  Our goal was to choose sites with diverse economic bases.  Three of the counties studied were identified as mining counties, two were manufacturing, and two were non-specialized (indicating a variety of economic influences or, in the case of economically distressed counties, a lack of a strong economic influence).  Both of the non-specialized counties are located in eastern Kentucky.  The Appalachian Regional Commission defines one of these counties as distressed and the other as in transition out of economic distress.  Economic distress is defined as falling below national averages in income, educational achievement, and employment.  As stated above, an eighth metropolitan site located adjacent to an urban center was also studied.  The eight sites were chosen to represent geographic diversity across the state including three western counties (west of Louisville), two central counties, and three counties in eastern Kentucky.

Next


Send mail to jjensen@pop.uky.edu with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: April 16, 2000