Appendix C
Home Up Contents Executive Summary Introductory Stories Emergent Themes Policy Issues Recommendations

Quantitative Results

Motivation to Attend Adult Education

        Participants’ were probed regarding their motivation to attend adult education programs.  Responses were coded into five categories: (1) attending for financial or job-related reasons, (2) attending purely for the sake of learning, (3) attending for family-related reasons, and (4) no indication of any motivation to attend. One participant indicated that it would be socially desirable to attend adult education classes; however, that participant was not included in this set of analyses.

        There were no differences in motivation to attend adult education by county (c2 (18) = 21.87, NS), age (F (3, 70) = 2.42, NS), years of schooling (F (3, 71) = 0.30, NS), number of children (F (3, 72) = 0.22, NS), marital status (c2 (3) = 5.76, NS), home ownership (c2 (3) = 2.65, NS), and whether or not respondents were KTAP recipients (c2 (3) = 2.27, NS), whether or not friends or family members have attended adult education programs (c2 (3) = 0.51, NS),  and whether or not the county was a low or high-unemployment county (c2 (3) = 0.93, NS).

        Current employment status was broken down into three categories: employed full-time, unemployed, or other (part-time employment, job placement, self-employed, etc.).  Current employment status was unrelated to motivation (c2 (6) = 4.57, NS), and was unrelated to having had friends or relatives who attended adult education programs (c2 (2) = 1.37, NS).

        There were gender differences in motivation to attend adult education programs, (c2 (3) = 9.63 p<.05). Females (73.3%) were more likely than males (26.7%) to indicate that they were motivated to attend for family-related reasons, whereas males (76.2%) were more likely than females (23.8%) to indicate that they were motivated to attend merely for the sake of learning. In addition, males (61.1%) were somewhat more likely than females (38.9%) to report being motivated to attend for job-related purposes.

        Participants also were asked about deterrents to participation. Responses were coded into six categories: (1) job-related time constraints, (2) child-related time constraints, (3) other types of time constraints, (4) cost or transportation issues, (5) confidence, and (6) no or other reasons.

        Deterrents were unrelated to county (c2 (30) = 26.07, NS), marital status (c2 (5) = 5.95, NS), home ownership (c2 (5) = 6.29, NS), number of children (F (5, 71) = 1.67, NS), age (F (5, 69) = 1.08, NS), or years of schooling, (F (5, 70) = 0.72, NS), and whether or not the county was a low or high-unemployment county (c2 (5) = 2.40, NS).

        Deterrents were related to gender, (c2 (5) = 14.87, p<.01). Job-related time constraints were more typical for males (78.9%) than for females (21.1%), whereas child-related constraints were more typical for females (90%) than for males (10%). Concerns about confidence were more typical for males (66.7%) than for females (33.3%).

        Deterrents also were related to whether or not participants received KTAP (c2 (5) = 15.47, p<.01). Cost and transportation were greater deterrents for KTAP recipients (75%) than for non-recipients (25%), whereas job-related time constraints were greater concerns for non-recipients (84.2%) than for recipients (15.8%). 

Back


Send mail to jjensen@pop.uky.edu with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: April 16, 2000